















Some random funny thoughts:
OK… Let us apply to dogs, different breeds of dogs. For example, certainly a canine or pitbull would be a much better and ferocious fighter than a pug or a hotdog wiener dog.
But the funny thing is I think all breeds of dogs could pro generate with one another, irregardless of breed? 
Also certainly with human beings, there are some families which are naturally taller, some families which are naturally shorter. And certainly there has been some sort of genetic diversification on the planet and beyond, especially when it comes a different parts of the planet.
For example, certain places certain humans have more bodily hair, possibly to dissipate the heat. Other places, darker pigments to fight off the sun. It makes sense, if your family genetic heritage is from sub-Saharan Africa, logically the human body will produce more pigment to fight off the sun then if your genetic heritage was from northern Sweden, in which during the winter time you might only get 30 minutes of sun.
I’m starting to feel more and more… Maybe other people, they’re just a different breed than me. For example, I think of myself kind of like a canine, a K9 attack police dog, and everyone else is just a wiener dog? Or annoying poodles?
And so then… When other people try to punk me around, I have zero tolerance for it.
For example, let us say that you were a ferocious fighting dog, and there’s a random annoying poodle that starts barking at you! Or tries to bully you around? How would you respond? Obviously you would just want the damn poodle to shut up! 
In my mind, I see myself like an Achilles. I see myself like the most handsome, powerful, dominant, ultra being out there. And perhaps it is precisely my oversized ego is where I get my power.
 I think there are a lot of sissy philosophers and thinkers who somehow think that ego is a bad thing. I think this is not the case. Your ego is almost like your balls and your testicles… would you castrate yourself because sometimes it makes you too angry– having big balls and a lot of testosterone is almost like overpower.
For example, we think about Dragon Ball Z, Goku going super Saiyan etc.… Obviously you want the golden flaming flowing hair,  and the ultra power of going super Saiyan! But let us say that with the ability to go super Saiyan, there were also some downsides like sometimes you cannot tolerate the power? Would you sacrifice it? Of course not!
Kind of like a raging river, Niagara Falls; with the point be to simply cut it off … or wouldn’t a more intelligent strategy to be to harness it like putting a water electricity damn thing on it, harness the hydropower, not to cut it off?
And this is my critique about modern day times, it seems like a lot of people are trying to do is to castrate the source, rather than channel that energy for positive constructive good things!
For example, the ego should be something augmented, amplified and magnified, but also concurrent channeled in such a way which could be empowering and useful for others?
So can we use the ego in a constructive or positive way?
First, a non-competitive spirit… Just complement everybody you see! Even if somebody is taller, more good looking, handsomer, richer, more successful, buffer than you! When you see somebody with a great physique, the correct strategy is to compliment them and acknowledge them!
Second, two harness and channel your ego and your energy and your physiological power towards riding, producing text, making videos, podcasts etc.… Sharing ideas, irregardless of how unethical they may seem.
If anything… I’m starting to think more and more, the only interesting ideas are the unethical ones. Or the ones which are shunned by mainstream modern day society.
To me, the only good ideas are the bad ones. When an idea seems right, and it seems to make sense, typically it is bad and or wrong.
When it comes to values, there is no written wrong, there are simply authentic to yourself, or not.
For example, my values and beliefs in open source, entrepreneurship, impartment through photography are true. Why? I grew up poor, single working mom waiting tables at Japanese sushi restaurant for nearly 20 years, and also almost went homeless twice. A lot of your own personal narrative forms who you are.
As a consequence, I think the idea is not too shroud who you are, your own personality etc., but rather to magnify it!
For example, I’m a very inquisitive, curious person, and I’d like to chop it up! I like to be friendly!
Funny enough… I tried to be friendly to everybody, but people who are standoffish, or bizarro, they react to me in very bizarre ways. But should I suddenly shut down my friendly personality because other guy is a cowardly poodle? No!
Ever since I was a kid, what was my great gift? Being a great entertainer! I am literally the most entertaining person that I know, I’ve only met maybe two people in the flesh who outperformed me.
Maybe it is a form of social conquest, trolling around, having fun etc.! Maybe it is that I seek to be the biggest dick in the room? 
But it’s supposed to question is, why do I care? Why do I care to be the biggest dick in the room?
Not sure? Maybe the desire to dominate is in my DNA? 
Whether you like it or not, I’ll stream the photographer, especially young ones are disciples of ERIC KIM. How and why? I essentially created a metaphorical Bible or textbook or encyclopedia and ultimate resource for anything revolving around street photography. Why?
It was always my number one goal to be the number one street photographer on Google, to become number one in street photography. As a consequence, my laser like eyes and focus was insanely simple; do everything I could to become number one on Google for street photography. And the strategy was very very simple, create the most in-depth articles blog posts and information for everything street photography! It took me nearly a decade, but I did it! After that, other domains to conquer.
But the funny thing is in today’s world… certainly Google is relevant, but now that ChatGPT is coming out with their own search engine, which is in my opinion at least 1000 X more intelligent, google should be scared, very scared. 
Obviously it will be ChatGPT and AI, open AI.
Let us consider… AI and cars. Besides the vanity object, the ideal is for your car to be 100% self driving, and this is where Tesla is a great bet; one should think of Tesla like artificial intelligence company with wheels.
Because the truth is, if you compare the ride quality of any Tesla car and any Toyota, the Toyota is superior and almost every single shape and form, besides speed. A Tesla is very very uncomfortable, the springs are too harsh, the ride quality is inferior to even my 2010 Prius!
For example, if you wanted a car with the ultimate ride comfort, you would probably purchase a Lexus vehicle, or maybe a Mercedes? 
But anyways, the really intelligent strategy is to purchase the cheapest base level Tesla car, with the most basic options, and just purchase auto pilot. I think auto pilot for about $8000 is the best deal of all time; it is like having your own personal driving slave that doesn’t need to be fed, paid, never gets tired, is always ready.
Even the new Google pixel that comes with the new pro Gemini AI… If your life runs on Gmail, it is kind of the game changer.
Even Apple is lagging behind in artificial intelligence, the new Apple Intelligence looks pretty lame. Super smart that the Apple team decided to integrate with open AI to integrate ChatGPT into her services; if you can’t beat them, join them. 
Rather than Apple trying to create a ChatGPT copycat, simply to integrate or offer ChatGPT services on the iPhone is the smart way.
I guess Google has had a bit of a headstart; she was in the AI game for a very long time. And this is where Google to pivot to focus on AI is a good idea. 
In a brave New World of ChatGPT, AI etc.… What is the purpose or the significance of humans?
 the first step is to transfer all of the tedious tasks from humans to ChatGPT. Or AI.
For example, the greatest innovation of TurboTax is having that new AI that automatically has you categorize all of your expenses. Oh my god, this was literally the most hateful thing about doing my taxes, having to categorize all of my different deductions.  But now, what would otherwise take me about eight hours, takes me about eight seconds when you connect TurboTax with your bank accounts.
And this is where the future of things become interesting; all these things in the past which we had to do inefficiently slowly and begrudgingly… we should just let AI do it, and we humans do more meaningful things. 
I think this is the future; let AI be the new slave, and you, the flesh bound human being, you do the human creative work!
ChatGPT is one quadrillion times more productive than you. This is a big deal. Why?
What that means is that the purpose of us humans is not productivity. We can finally unchain ourselves from the leashes of this ridiculous notion of productivity. 
The gods, who live at ease. 
You fools, the point of life is not to give fellatio to hard things, hard lives, etc. We should be like Zeus, with the mighty thunderbolt, the gods lived in supreme ease.
This is also the funny thing is that when a lot of people retire, make a bunch of money or whatever they are lost… they don’t know how to embrace or live a life of ease; they’re still trying to grind their nose against the grinder, because for their whole life, that is what their life was? 
I would say emulate the gods of the Iliad, ancient Greece. Read the new Iliad translation by Emily Wilson, I purchased it in the iBooks store, reading on my iPad Pro and I love it!
I suppose that the primary thing here to consider is the ethos of human humanity, reasons of living etc.
I think for too long, the whole ethos of humanity was to maximize productivity, income income earning potential, money and capital and capitalism etc.… But once again, if bitcoin, AI and ChatGPT can do it better than you, by 1 billion fold,,, what is your new life ethos?
Assuming that you’re a big contractor, and you’re building a new skyscraper or commercial real estate or whatever, what is the goal? To create income producing property, and to eventually coup a profit?
However the great issue here is the cost to capital; the startup costs and the initial investment is too high! As a consequence, let us say that you invested $1 billion to build this new commercial real estate… You eventually have to find all these tenants to sign a lease, occupy it, pay the lease or the rent, and maybe in 20 or 30 years you can make a positive profit? 
Assuming that bitcoin is digital capital, digital land, digital real estate… The cost of capital is practically zero, you just have to sit and vest, I can almost guarantee you that you have a 0% risk over 30 years. And I can almost guarantee you with 100% clarity that bitcoin will go up in the next 30 years. 
I also like the notion of bitcoin being digital real estate because nobody checks their home price on Zillow 10 times a day, reacting to short term increases or decreases or volatility.
It is a feature, not a bug!
First, you could trade bitcoin 24/7, 365, every millisecond. 
Let us consider how insane this is… It is the year 2024, we live in the future, and traditional markets are closed on the weekends? This is 1 trillion times bizarre.
Assuming that the real world was like a science fiction film… Can you Which economic trading doesn’t happen on the weekends?
So this is why bitcoin is so volatile and always goes up and down, almost randomly because it is always trading! I wonder if the volatility of other assets and stocks are a lot less because simply you can’t trade it on the weekends.
I’m pretty sure that almost 99.9% of men, assuming that they have an iPhone, probably watches porn every single day, almost 100% certain at least once a week or once a month etc. Or better yet, if you want to see whether your friend watches porn or not, ask to see his laptop, and to see whether they have a torrenting or VPN application installed on their MacBook laptop– utorrent, Trasmission etc.
Or, if they have the brave browser on their phone, Google Chrome incognito etc.
Almost every single person I know who works in tech, knows how to program or code whatever, all use pirate bay.
Anyways, once again another bizarre thing; one would never watch pornography which is centered around ideas, souls, personalities, etc. It is always the flesh, the human body!
Why did it in modern day times, we are trying to deny the human body, and trying to promote instead, one’s “personality†and “mind†and “soul‖ ?
“ I will never service that man’s bedâ€
Helen, the Godlike woman
Aphrodite, who loves smiles
The ever smiling Aphrodite
Warlike
Roasted fat
Dreadful carnage
Spoke winged words
Unhurried
Where are all the beautiful men?
Porn can only revolve the human body ,,, the female one, not the male one.
Certainly not the “mind†or the “soul†or even one’s “personality�
Live at ease
Immortal sleep
Never ages or decays
Rumor burned
Cunning
Don’t be frightened like coward or peasant
Sacker of cities
Shirt
Magnified their pain
Athena — fight forever
Diomedes master of the war cry
Terror in war
His bright helm flashing
Breathing aggression
The god of tears and war
Dog face
Pitiless bronze
The bronze blade took their strength
Spear that casts long shadows
Breasts to stir desire
Why do breasts stir desire?
Not in the physical realm but the cyber or digital realm —
Eric Kim has shared several insights and reflections on Jeff Bezos, often using quotes to emphasize lessons he’s learned. Some of the key quotes and ideas Kim has attributed to or discussed about Bezos include:
These quotes illustrate how Kim has internalized and adapted Bezos’s business philosophies into broader life lessons, applying them to both his personal growth and creative endeavors.
Eric Kim has extensively reflected on the lessons and philosophies of Jeff Bezos, particularly through his writings on Bezos’s book Invent and Wander and other sources. Kim draws inspiration from Bezos’s ability to endure significant challenges, such as Amazon’s stock plummeting during the dot-com bubble, and highlights Bezos’s long-term vision and strategic thinking. He also admires Bezos’s “Day One†mentality, which emphasizes staying hungry and avoiding complacency by treating every day as the first day of a startup.
Kim also appreciates Bezos’s unconventional parenting style, which reflects a broader philosophy of fostering resourcefulness and resilience from a young age. He emphasizes the importance of creating long-term value, being bold rather than timid, and continuously innovating to avoid being outpaced by competitors. These principles are seen as crucial not just in business but also in personal growth and creative pursuits.
In summary, Kim sees Bezos not just as a business leader, but as someone whose life principles can be applied broadly to achieve success and fulfillment in various aspects of life oai_citation:3,Eric Kim on Jeff Bezos book notes invent and wander – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Lessons I’ve Learned from Jeff Bezos Invent and Wander Book – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,7 Lessons Jeff Bezos Can Teach You – ERIC KIM.
Eric Kim has referenced the quote “Your margin is my opportunity,” which is originally attributed to Jeff Bezos, in various contexts on his blog. Kim admires Bezos’s strategic thinking and often discusses how this philosophy can be applied beyond just business margins. For Kim, the phrase also reflects a mindset of seeking opportunities where others see obstacles, whether in business, photography, or personal growth. He emphasizes that where there is inefficiency or complacency, there lies a chance to innovate and create something better.
In his writings, Kim often explores how this approach aligns with broader life strategies, encouraging his readers to adopt a mentality that looks for possibilities in every situation, not just in competitive markets but in personal and creative endeavors as well oai_citation:2,JEFF BEZOS IS HIGHLY UNDERRATED. – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,Your margin is my opportunity – ERIC KIM.
The phrase “Your margin is my opportunity” is often attributed to Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon. It encapsulates the idea that in competitive markets, the inefficiencies or excessive profits of one company present opportunities for others to enter the market, undercut prices, or innovate in a way that captures market share.
In essence, it reflects a mindset focused on exploiting the gaps left by competitors. If a company is operating with large profit margins, it suggests that there might be room for someone else to offer a similar product or service at a lower cost or with added value, thereby seizing the opportunity to attract customers.
This approach has been a key aspect of Amazon’s strategy over the years, as the company consistently seeks to disrupt industries by finding and capitalizing on the inefficiencies of established players.
The true mensch stoic way—
Something I have been meaning to write or create or do is like some sort of book, ebook, pamphlet, or introductory primer to stoicism. I really think that stoicism is probably one of the most useful and philosophical models to live normal every day real life. Yet, I haven’t really found a good instructional guide on it, especially when I was self teaching it to myself.
Consider this a practical primer, cutting through the BS:
Stoicism, stoic, the stoa in ancient Greece– essentially the stoa was like some sort of portico, patio, pillar, outside, essentially a spot where guys would just hang out, talk shop, talk philosophy, etc.  
I think about the show “Hey Arnold†in which I was raised with… the notion of “stoop kid“, the notion of a stoop is that in a lot of cities, especially the east coast in New York, you have this little stoop or porch, stairs that go outside your front door… and you could just hang out there, engage in social and neighborhood life etc.
One of my happiest moments was when I was living in Providence Rhode Island, and then COVID-19 hit. Everything was closed, besides the park. I can still go to the park, hang out, workout, do chin ups– I learned how to do muscle ups, more bodyweight calisthenics stuff, and also… I had a lot of fun with this “rock toss“ challenge and workout… in the middle of the park was a huge ass rock and huge ass stone, and every single day I would go there pick it up, and then eventually work out with it; throwing it around for fun, doing overhead presses with it, clean and jerks, squats, and eventually I would just throw it around for fun. Funny enough it might have been the most fit I was in my life… this was the true “functional†fitness.
The inspiration — Hector lifting an insanely massive stone (barely 2 strong men could lift it)… using it to break down the door of the ships of the other side.
Anyways, the reason why that period of covid was so good is that it was in the middle of beautiful Providence Rhode Island summer, so nice and bright and warm and lovely… and one of the good things was going to the park was like an open forum, a new anatheum for a lot of really cool guys to come, hang out, talk shop, go topless and shirtless, workout and hang out.
I met some really interesting people during that period of time. I met some guys who were really cool. For example, one guy I met was in the US military Navy, I think he was training to be a Navy seal or Delta force or something. Another guy in some sort of ROTC training, another cool guy from the hood, and also I would say I probably met half a dozen friendly drug dealers there. And of course a lot of people who believed in conspiracy theories; really friendly, a little weird, but overall good guys.
Anyways, one of the biggest benefits of hanging out at that outdoor park, open air, nothing but green grass, the beautiful sun and the fitness equipment was that I think having this sort of open air environment is actually very conducive to socializing, thinking and thought, and pro social behavior. My theory about a lot of modern day antisocial behavior has to do with the structures which enclose us. For example, almost universally most guys at the gym are extremely antisocial. Why? My theory is that because most gyms have closed, cramped narrow ceilings, and do not have access to natural light, or outside space.
Cramped indoor spaces promote antisocial behavior.
The only good gym I went to which was interesting was the golds gym in Venice, which has this really big outdoor workout area. I think this is much more natural and more fun and better; to be able to work out directly outside outdoors, with your shirt off.
Stoics, stoicism — it was originally I think codified by this guy named Zeno, and over time he picked up some followers. Essentially the whole thing happened organically; Zeno would first share his thinking on philosophy ethics and pragmatic ways to deal with other people and the downsides of life, he built a following, and then his followers would propagate the thoughts and start their own little schools of thoughts, their own little stoic clubs.
Would I like about stoicism is how loosey goosey it is. It is kind of like zen, or taoism… it is not really quantified as a religion, or a strict moral order. In fact, a lot of the ancients stoics would meditate on random stuff like cosmology, natural sciences like Seneca, how volcanoes worked or whatever. I think nowadays in today’s world, we focus primarily on the pragmatic side; how to deal with fear, uncertainty, downsides etc.
I think I might’ve first learned about stoicism from Nassim Taleb and his ANTIFRAGILE book. I was curious, and my curiosity went to deep. To quote NASSIM TALEB and the Venetian saying “The ocean goes deeper, the deeper you wade into it.â€
I literally consumed every single book I could find on stoicism, even the obscure ones. Funny enough, a lot of the stoic thinkers tried to claim other philosophers as being stoic, like Seneca did with Diogenes the cynic. 
Cynic, cynicism, actually comes from the word canine, the dog. Diogenes was considered the “dog†philosopher, first used as a pejorative, but ultimately Diogenes reappropriated that title for fun! He saw dogs as tough, almost like wild wolves, rather than seeing them as a negative thing.
Even Achilles when he was raging against king Agamemnon, he called him “dog faced“ as a heaping insult.
First, Seneca. Seneca the younger, his dad was called Seneca the elder.
In fact, this is such a big deal because Cindy and I named our first son, Seneca, directly after the stoic philosopher. This is true soul in the game; if you name your kid after your favorite philosopher, certainly it is a sign that you really liked that philosopher, or found them impactful.
The reason why I really like Seneca the stoic philosopher is because he had real connections to real reality. What that means is he wasn’t just on the sidelines; he actually existed in the real world, engaged in real politics, was even advisor to the emperor Nero, the bad one, who eventually low-key coerced Seneca to commit suicide, in a manly, dignified manner.
I think this was because maybe… there was actually a plan to overthrow Nero, and essentially Nero found out. 
I really like Seneca because his writing is accessible, practical and pragmatic, and interesting.
A lot of thinkers tend to lack connections to real reality, I have no tolerance for boring philosophers to talk about metaphysics, which is things which are not physical. Like thoughts ideas, the universe, electricity and energy, strange phenomenon and conspiracy theories on ghosts, “energy†whatever.
For a long time, I would hear the term “metaphysics†being thrown around, and I had zero idea what it actually meant. 
Meta– on top of. Or nestled within.
Physics — the physical, physical phenomenon like gravity, first principles.
The reason why metaphysics philosophers tend to be a bunch of losers is that they are all weak and anemic, nerds or geeks or weaklings who seem to have some sort of physiological degeneracy, which encourages them to opine or talk or think about impractical things, superficial things.
Personally speaking, I think philosophy must be practical. 
Practical, praxis, practice — to do!
I have a very funny ideal; the general idea is that your body looks like a demigod, and your physiology is out of control. The general idea is one must be tall, strong, highly muscular, low body fat percentage, I’m not exactly sure what my body fat percentage is, but maybe it’s around 5%.
Also, physical fitness is critical to any stoic. My ideal is to walk 50 miles a day, eat 20 pounds of meat like Milo of Croton a day. And also, abstinence from silly things like media, alcohol, drugs, marijuana etc.
Trust no thinker who does drugs!
Even our best friend Nietzsche said that coffee was bad, because it would make people dark and gloomy. He encouraged 100% cocoa powder instead. 
Simple technique:
First, look at a picture or a portrait or a full body shot, ideally topless of the artist, philosopher or thinker or individual… then judge their thoughts later.
Why? My theory is this: the thoughts of an individual is hugely affected by their bodily physiology.
For example, an extreme example: if somebody is locked inside a solitary confinement cell, and not permitted to go outside for years, but, he had a pen and pad and would jot down some thoughts… Would be the quality of these thoughts? Certainly dark and morose.
In today’s world, why does it matter, what is the significance of stoicism, etc.?
First and foremost, I think we are living in a troubling time, especially with the advent of modern day internet based media and advertising. I think 99% of what is propagated on the internet is fear mongering, and what is hate? Hate is just fear.
The first thought on stoicism is that it is just fear conquering. What I discovered about street photography, is that 99% of it is conquering your fears. Conquering your fears of upsetting other people, getting in some sort of verbal or physical altercation etc. In fact my bread and butter workshop is my conquering your fears and street photography workshop, the workshop which is still interesting to me even after a decade.
Why is this so important? I think it is rooted in almost everything; conquering your fears is rooted in entrepreneurship, innovation, risktaking and real life.
Even my speculation in crypto. 99.9% of crypto speculation is just balls. Having the balls to make big bets, and when things go south, knowing how to master your emotions.
A simple extra I have is this: just imagine it will all go down to zero.
It was useful because when I was in college, my sophomore year I got really into trading stocks, and I eventually lost my whole life savings, maybe around $3500 USD, and some bad penny stock which I actually misread the financials… the whole time I thought the company was making a profit, but actually it was taking a loss. I actually didn’t know that if profits are written in parentheses, it means a loss.
It was funny because my initial start as an investor was back in high school, I bought some Adobe stock when I was a high school junior, and also some mutual funds, which both went up after about 4-5 years.
Also I remember in elementary school computer class, when I was in the sixth grade in Bayside Queens, there was some sort of stock stimulation trading game, and actually it was funny… the kids who made the most money and were the most successful just put 100% of everything into Apple, note this is when we were only 12 years old, and I was born in 1988.
Funny enough, it seems that stoicism actually plays well with capitalism. Why? According to modern day capitalist thinking, the best way to approach life is to be objective, strong, stoic, unemotional, logical and rational.
Also, with modern day media there is so much fear mongering in the news, about some sort of global armageddon, global financial ruin, etc. I call it “fear pornâ€.
Therefore stoicism as a mindset is useful to think and position your mind in such a way that you could consider that life is all upside, no downside.
In fact, if I could summarize stoicism in one sentence, it is that life is all upside, no downside. Inspired by NASSIM TALEB.
So, is stoicism useful to you if you’re a man or a woman? Does it matter?
The good thing is I think it could apply to both sexes. Conquering sexism and social pressures is useful if you’re woman, and also if you’re a man.
Also, gender is social. Lot of the expectations set on us by society is socialized and gamed to a certain degree.
First, we got to unchain ourselves from modern day ethics and morality. I believe that all modern day philosophy and thinking and ethics and religion is bad.
For example, the notion of turning the other cheek is a patently bad one. Why did Jesus turn his cheek? It is because he lacked on army.
Also, philosophically I think we should put no trust in Socrates. I thought which has puzzled me for a long time was this “Why was Socrates so ugly?
Monster in face, monster in soul.
I think Socrates was a degenerate, and he lacked any sort of real power. Therefore he turned logic and rationality into his terrorizing weapon (via Nietzsche). Back in the day, you didn’t need logic or rationality to have things your way, you simply was able to dictate that which you wanted to pause it, because you had a military force behind you. Just think about Machiavelli and IL PRINCIPE– the reality of being a mercurial prince, king, and military leader is hard, stoic, “immoralâ€. But ultimately it all comes down to war, conquest, the military.
Trust nobody who uses rationality or logic as their tyrannizing weapon. 
In fact, I believe that all should have the body and strength of some sort of super soldier. Essentially look like all the guys from the movie 300, this is our ideal.
Demigod physique. 
And this is the true courage of Kanye West; he literally put everything on the line, and even lost his spouse and I think maybe his kids? All for the sake of revealing inequities. 
“I throw these Maybach keys fucking c’est la vie! I know that we the new slaves.â€ï¿¼- Ye
The fun thing about stoicism is that you could just make it up as you go, devise your own strategies and whatever.
“Fucking c’est la vie!†My favorite Kanye West line.
Essentially the general idea is that in life, one should not take things too seriously. Laughter is golden, I forget the philosopher who was called the laughing philosopher… Democritus?; better to laugh about the follies of human beings rather than to be dark and morose about it.
Also, thoughts from the Odyssey; if you look far enough  into the future, everything becomes comedic and hilarious.
So when you’re in some sort of bad situation, just think to yourself “Perhaps one day, 20 or 30 years from now… I will look back at this and just laugh!†It will just be humorous.
Honestly, laughter, and kind of being able to joke about things might be the best way to live life and deal with setbacks. 
Problems in modern day life:
A funny thing I have learned is that when you call something something, it isn’t that.
For example, if someone calls something a “luxury carâ€, it ain’t. For example, a true modern day luxury car is maybe a Tesla, but Tesla never calls itself a luxury car. Also the ultimate luxury technology company is probably Apple… but Apple is very intelligent and not calling themselves a luxury brand.
A pro tip is when it comes to websites, read the alternative text, the header text, the stuff that shows up in the tab of your browser window. If the website, the automotive retailer tries to market themselves as a “luxury†brand, typically it is actually a sign that it isn’t a luxury brand it isn’t luxury brand.
Thought: what are some good examples of true luxury brands which don’t overly calls itself luxury? 
In someways, we can think and consider stoicism as our new luxury. In fact, having luxury, luxury of mind and soul… and luxury of freedom of speech, isn’t this the ultimate luxury?
When somebody asked Diogenes the cynic; “What is the best human goodâ€? He said “Freedom of speech, speaking your mind, having the power to see whatever is on your mind.â€
In fact, my current joy is becoming more and more free talking, and free riding. What that means is this; I’m ain’t going to censor myself no more, even if I might be politically incorrect insensitive or whatever. 
Also, I would prefer to speak my mind and seriously hurt the feelings of others, rather than soften it for the sake of the other person. 

Similarly speaking, when people call themselves “influencersâ€, they are not influencers.
Ultimately I think we should think of stoicism just like having another tool inside our tool kit. For example, if you’re a chef, you’re going to have different knives for different purposes. If you’re going to cut a big piece of meat, you probably want a big ass meat cutting knife, not something you would use to slice an apple with. Similarly speaking, if you’re going to scoop out the insides of an avocado, better to use a spoon rather than using a fork, or a knife. 
I think the problem is when some people get too into stoicism (I prefer writing stoicism with a lowercase), they think that everything needs to be consistent, and must fit into this nice little neat box of what is considered “stoicism“. This is a bad line of thinking… let us consider that Marcus Aurelius never even mentioned stoicism in his writings, his collections of thoughts, which we moderns call THE MEDITATIONS… it was just essentially his personal diary, to help him conquer his own personal fears and thoughts, I don’t think he ever intended it to be published publicly. I think he just wrote it to himself as self therapy. And I think the only stoic philosopher he even mentions is maybe Epictetus.
For myself, I just come out with certain to work out thoughts and techniques because it helps me, and when I find these tricks or techniques or secret hacks or cheat codes… My passion is to simply share it with others. 
And ultimately, things are ever in flux and evolving and changing and adapting.
For example, I’ve discovered the quality of my thinking is different when I am in Culver City Los Angeles, compared to being in the boring suburbs of Orange County.
Also depending on my social environments… my stoic thoughts are different when I am in a gym, vs just working out by myself in my parking spot in the back of my apartment.
Also, the quality of my thoughts is different when living with family members or other people versus just living with myself Cindy and Seneca.
Assuming you’re not growing your own vegetables and living in the middle of nowhere… you probably have some interaction with other human beings. As long as you have an iPhone, an Android phone, a smartphone, a 4G or 5G internet connection, wifi, a laptop, have to buy groceries somewhere… you’re still going to have to interact with other human beings.
And this is good. There is no other greater joy than other human beings.
In fact, modern-day society is strange because in someways, the ethos is to be antisocial and to be cowardly. But in fact, the best way to think about things is that real life is interaction with other human beings, and social conquest. One can imagine a lot of modern day entrepreneurship as simply a big dick swinging contest. He who is the most masculine confident tall and strong and stoic shall win.
Assume that everyone is mentally insane: Have you ever been out in public, and you see some sort of crackhead or strange homeless person who acts radically, smells terrible, and is obviously mentally ill? Do you hate them for it? When they say something weird to you… do you take it personally? No. Why? They are crazy. Perhaps we should just adopt this stoic mindset towards other people; some people are actually physiologically ill, mentally unwell… don’t trust the opinion of nobody.
A lot of people are trying to actually deal with their own inner demons: For example, becoming the successful photographer and street photographer I am today… I’ve dealt with some individuals who would say anonymous bad things about me, and later I found out that their mom just died or something. I cannot imagine what it feels like losing a mother… therefore if somebody spew some hate on me because something bad happened to them, I’m not gonna take it personally.
Self-flagellation: I think a lot of people who are sick, mentally or physiologically self flagellate themselves. Essentially the way that they deal with other people or themselves is some sort of metaphorical self-flagellation.
For example… you know those strange individuals who have the whip and whip themselves, and inflict pain on themselves? I think some people do this metaphorically to themselves and others.
You just want to stay away from them.
My personal theory on fear is that a lot of it is tied to morality and ethics. I think the general idea is not necessarily that we are afraid of anything… I think the true fear is that we’re afraid that we are some sort of bad evil unethical immoral person.
For example in street photography, the general ethical thought is that it is immoral to take a photo of somebody without their permission, because there is some sort of it inherent evil behind it. Is this true? No. Taking photos and not really a big deal.
I think it is because some people are just overly sensitive, which once again comes from some sort of physiological weakness.
For example, if you’re a weightlifter who could lift 1000 pounds, assuming you’re not taking any steroids or anything… are small things going to bother you? No. But let us assume that you are a skinny fat man, all you do is drink alcohol and smoke marijuana and watch Netflix, and you spent too much time on Reddit… you are 40% body fat, and have never lifted in your life. And also your testosterone is low and you never go outside. Certainly the quality of your thoughts is going to be different than if you’re a happy gay monster, lifting weights outside in the direct sun, laughing and having fun. 
In fact, I’ve actually personally discovered that the reason why a lot of people hate me is because I am so happy jovial and gay. They are secretly suspicious or envious of me? 
Probably one of my worst experiences was this jarring transition; I was super happy insanely happy being in Vietnam in 2017; with a beautiful weather, the beautiful light, the happy people the great amenities etc.… and then that winter Cindy and I went to Europe, in Marseille Berlin and Prague, and maybe London… seriously the worst winter of my life. Why? I wonder if so much miserable feelings and thoughts simply comes from the darkness and lack of light. a lot of Europe is actually quite miserable; dark, unhygienic, morose.
Even Nietzsche had a thought about Schopenhauer; How much of these emo European philosophers came from the fact that it was just complaining about the cold weather in Germany etc.?

For myself, my ideal weather is Southeast Asia; I love being in Phnom Penh Cambodia, Vietnam etc. In the states, am I the only one who loves living in Los Angeles? Dr. Dre and Kendrick Lamar said that LA was the best for women weed and weather… I would definitely say the biggest upside of living in Los Angeles is the light, the sunlight. It actually does get quite cold here, but usually most reliably even in December during the winter time, the sun will always come up. As long as there is bright sunny light, I will be happy. And I think maybe for myself, considering that I am a photographer, and photography means painting with light… light for me is critical.
I also wonder how much of it is a physiological thing and a genetic trait; for example I could even recall being a young child, and my mom telling me that the most critical thing in finding a home or an apartment was light and natural light. Even now… 90% of my happiness comes from being able to have access to natural light, ideally floor to ceiling windows facing directly the sun, having some sort of modern temperature regulated apartment and home. Even living in our tiny studio minimalistic luxury apartment in Providence Rhode Island, where it was always 75° warm and cozy, and not frigid and damp and cold and dark and humid… I was always good. But moving to an older house, where it always felt damp and cold… this literally lowered my happiness by 1000%.
Therefore, if you’re feeling miserable sad or whatever… I say spend three months living in Hanoi or Saigon in Vietnam, or go to Phnom Penh Cambodia. I wonder if 90% of peoples misery is simply due to the weather.
â€Better to be a gay monster than a sentimental bore!†– Fernandino Galliani, via Nietzsche
My stoic ideal is somebody who is happy, gay, smiling, no headphones or AirPods on, no sunglasses on, no hat, no facial hair, no baggy oversized clothing, no tint in their car. Somebody who makes great eye contact, laughs, stands up upright, jokes, and fools around. Like an overgrown child.
Also, lift weights at least once every day, ideally in the direct sun. Just buy some weightlifting equipment on Titan.fitness, I like the farmers carry handles, the Olympic loadable dumbbell, and also the Texas power squat bar. Just buy some cheap weights, and or buy a heavy 400 pound sandbag, and just have fun throwing it around.
A true stoic should look something like Hercules or Achilles. Or like ERIC KIM; I have the aesthetic and the physique of Brad Pitt in FIGHT CLUB except with a lot more muscle. Like my friend Soren says, the Adonis physique and proportions.
I think a real stoic is sexy, happy and fun. Who doesn’t take life too seriously; and think of everything like a fun game. A real stoic would be joyful and cheery like three-year-old child without any adulteration from the outside world.
I don’t like talking with or hanging out with adults, uninteresting.
At what point or age do people become so emo?
Typically, highschoolers are very optimistic. Even college students. But I think at least in maybe college in high school nowadays… the bad trend is towards “over concernâ€, about the world the planet ethics animals etc.
I find a lot of this thinking superficial, performative, and uncritical. I think “animal rights“, “saving the planet†is this new pseudo world religion; which is just capitalism 3.0. I find the whole pet industry the whole dog industry to be insanely bizarre, and I trust nobody who talks about “saving the planet“ who owns an iPhone, owns any sort of car, or has an Amazon prime subscription. Certainly not any vegans.
Animals are animals. They are lower on the hierarchy and totem pole on earth. Man is the apex predator, the apex bully and the apex tyrant.
Should we care for animals or “animal rights� No. Animals are our slaves.
If you consider even dogs and pets… they are essentially our emotional slaves. People talk a lot about the virtuosity of dogs being loyal or whatever… and giving you unconditional love. This seems like some sort of emotional slavery.
The only dogs I respect are some sort of canine dogs, some sort of attack or defense dogs, or hunting dogs. For example, John Wick 3; Halle Barry and her dogs. An animal should either be a weapon, or nothing.
Essentially it looks like men no longer have a backbone. No more spine.
I trust nobody who owns a dog.
Let us not forget; they call it dog ownership, or “owning a petâ€. There is no more concept of “human ownership, or “owning a human.â€ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼
What is the end goal of humanity? To me it is towards entrepreneurship, innovation, art and aesthetics, philosophy etc. Design.
Stoicism should be considered a tool which could aid you in these things.
For example, I think 99% of entrepreneurship is courage. Stoicism could help you with that.
I also think with design, great design is also 99% courage, having the courage to attempt something that won’t sell or be received well… stoicism is all about practical courage. The only designers with courage include Steve Jobs, Jony Ive, Elon Musk, Kanye West. 
Also, weightlifting. To attempt to lift a certain weight you have never attempted before takes great courage. For example, me atlas lifting 1000 pounds; that is 10 plates and a 25 on each side, this is true stoic training. Why? The fear of injury is what holds most people back; if you had successfully conquered this fear and not injured yourself, this is pure stoic bliss.
I think the only and the only proper way to lift weights is one repetition maximum training. That is; what is the maximum amount of weight you’re able to successfully lift or move, even half an inch?
To me, the courage is the success. Even if you had the courage to attempt it… that is what is considered success. 
Simple exercises to do include the atlas lift, innovated by ERIC KIM, or a one repetition max rack pull.
Or, a high trap bar deadlift, heavy Farmer’s walks, or heavy sandbag carries. Or even a simple thing you could do is go to the park or to the local nature center, find the biggest rock there and just see if you could pick it up.
If you’re interested in stoicism, and have had some interesting thoughts on stoicism, one of the most noble things you could do is start your own blog. I think blogs are 1000 times more effective than publishing some sort of static printed book; I think the problem in today’s world is that everyone is seeking some sort of legitimacy by being picked up by some sort of legitimate publisher and getting “published“, and seeing your printed book at Barnes & Noble whatever.
I say it is better to be open source, free and permissionless, decentralized. Just publish your thoughts and book as a free PDF, and just host it on dropbox, Google Drive, or your own web server. Share the link freely, and also just publish the raw text as a big blog post. 
Even Sam Bankman-Fried wisely thought; 99.9% of books could just be summarized as big blog posts.
Don’t trust any modern day published book which isn’t free, because… there is some sort of hidden clout chasing somewhere. 
Even one of the worst compromises that led to the demise of Ray Dalio was the fact that he took his Principles book, which was essentially a free ebook PDF on his website, and then took it off, because I think he got a book deal with Simon and Schuster. After he did that, he lost my respect.
If you’re already independently wealthy, and you don’t crowd source your self-esteem… why would you need to externally validate yourself by getting some sort of constipated publisher and annoying editor?
Editors are bad.
Start your own blog and start blogging your own thoughts on stoic philosophy, and even start a YouTube channel and start vlogging on it. My generalized thought is simple: if your thought your idea your blog post your video or whatever could even impact the life of one other human being on planet earth… it is worth it.
ERIC
What is the secret to the maximum amount of happiness in life? The maximum amount of danger. (Nietzsche).
ERIC
FIN

Become invincible:

Learn from the master stoics:
Yes, in The Iliad, organ meats are indeed consumed. The Homeric epics, including The Iliad, often depict detailed scenes of sacrifice and feasting. After an animal is sacrificed to the gods, the inner organs, particularly the liver, heart, and kidneys, are often roasted and consumed first. These parts of the animal were considered especially sacred and were sometimes offered to the gods or consumed by the participants in the sacrifice before the rest of the meat was cooked and eaten.
This practice reflects the ancient Greek ritual of animal sacrifice, where specific parts of the animal were designated for certain purposes, including offerings to the gods and consumption by humans.
How to lift like CIA:





















Add more extreme contrast to your life:
Man is black, woman is white? 
I’m starting to think that if we apply the black-and-white art photography aesthetic to real life, maybe the idea of “preserving the midtones“ is a bit boring.
The general notion of crushing the blacks is when you’re processing or post processing your photos, you dragged the black slider all the way to 100, and you also crank up the contrast to 100.
Aesthetically, I think this makes for much more striking and interesting images.
First, midtones are boring. Almost universally, the more you increase the contrast of something or the photos, the better.
For example, even when we design our homes. What is the best way to design a home? Very very simple, use white and black accents.
For example in my eyes, the ideal home exterior paint color is not a matte black, but rather, a pure clean white, with black trimming.
Also, with cars… I think we’ve discovered is the apex is both a shiny white with shiny black accents — gloss, not matte.
I think matte, matte black, the whole matte aesthetic is centered around jet stealth fighters, which desire to escape enemy detection. So typically when you try to matte black your car and murder it out… aesthetic you’re going for stealth bomber, or jet fighter aesthetic?
But the irony that I find… nobody would ever matte black or murder out their Prius, to escape detection from the police or the other party. We typically do it to our sports cars, our Teslas, etc. 
Put the strange inconsistency I see here is on one hand, we want to be seen and to show up, on the other hand, we want to be fake low-key, and be “humble�
A few years back, the song HUMBLE by Kendrick Lamar went triple maxi viral. It was the most viral song of all time, maybe even more viral than the recent “They Not Like Us†song.
The song was very bizarre to me. Because I’m not sure what Kendrick was really trying to say. Two interpretations —
But the weird inconsistency in modern day life is we are centered around Christian Jesus ethics, or some sort of quaker Protestant morality which is centered around notion of humility, being humble, close to the ground etc. This is why you will never ever ever meet a rich person in America called themselves rich, they will call themselves “fortunate“, or “luckyâ€ï¿¼ï¿¼.
Also another bizarre thing in the world of bodybuilding… you almost never ever ever see bodybuilders proud to flex unabashedly, like Arnold in the documentary Pumping Iron, back in the day. It is very uncommon for you to see self-confident men at the gym, working out topless, in booty shorts, 3 inch short shorts, flexing their muscles in the mirror, not trying to hide it etc.
The big issue with the typical bodybuilder is that they are trying to become dominant, but be humble about it? Really weird?
Add more extreme contrast to your life:
Man is black, woman is white? 
I’m starting to think that if we apply the black-and-white art photography aesthetic to real life, maybe the idea of “preserving the midtones“ is a bit boring.
The general notion of crushing the blacks is when you’re processing or post processing your photos, you dragged the black slider all the way to 100, and you also crank up the contrast to 100.
Aesthetically, I think this makes for much more striking and interesting images.
First, midtones are boring. Almost universally, the more you increase the contrast of something or the photos, the better.
For example, even when we design our homes. What is the best way to design a home? Very very simple, use white and black accents.
For example in my eyes, the ideal home exterior paint color is not a matte black, but rather, a pure clean white, with black trimming.
Also, with cars… I think we’ve discovered is the apex is both a shiny white with shiny black accents — gloss, not matte.
I think matte, matte black, the whole matte aesthetic is centered around jet stealth fighters, which desire to escape enemy detection. So typically when you try to matte black your car and murder it out… aesthetic you’re going for stealth bomber, or jet fighter aesthetic?
But the irony that I find… nobody would ever matte black or murder out their Prius, to escape detection from the police or the other party. We typically do it to our sports cars, our Teslas, etc. 
Put the strange inconsistency I see here is on one hand, we want to be seen and to show up, on the other hand, we want to be fake low-key, and be “humble�
A few years back, the song HUMBLE by Kendrick Lamar went triple maxi viral. It was the most viral song of all time, maybe even more viral than the recent “They Not Like Us†song.
The song was very bizarre to me. Because I’m not sure what Kendrick was really trying to say. Two interpretations —
But the weird inconsistency in modern day life is we are centered around Christian Jesus ethics, or some sort of quaker Protestant morality which is centered around notion of humility, being humble, close to the ground etc. This is why you will never ever ever meet a rich person in America called themselves rich, they will call themselves “fortunate“, or “luckyâ€ï¿¼ï¿¼.
Also another bizarre thing in the world of bodybuilding… you almost never ever ever see bodybuilders proud to flex unabashedly, like Arnold in the documentary Pumping Iron, back in the day. It is very uncommon for you to see self-confident men at the gym, working out topless, in booty shorts, 3 inch short shorts, flexing their muscles in the mirror, not trying to hide it etc.
The big issue with the typical bodybuilder is that they are trying to become dominant, but be humble about it? Really weird?
I am currently reading the Iliad by Emily Wilson, I am always always happy to see a new translation or a fresh take on the classic.
Anyways, also an interesting thought… I like the idea of reading a female woman translate the most manly literature of all time. I think the problem when I was talking to my friend Kelly, is that traditionally in the past, it was a bunch of impotent old men who would translate great classics like the Iliad or the Odyssey, using their own fake impotent machismo, to translate it.
For example, a lot of the misogyny, misogynistic language from 100 years ago or so, was actually very inaccurate.
Anyways, something worth noting is how artful, succinct, beautiful, and unlike English ancient Greek was. In fact, I definitely want to get Seneca on the classics, get him into Latin and ancient Greek, and mathematics like NASSIM TALEB recommended.
If you think about it long enough, what are the least harmful majors which exist? Classics, math, physics.
Classics is almost like the superior form of sociology, physical theory, it is the pillar of the humanities. Either classics or history.
Math, it will never hurt nobody. There are simple binary rules of math, it is either right or wrong, but then again the problem with a lot of mathematicians math teachers or people who are too into math, they seek some sort of rationality behind real life, society and people… but the true wise man knows that humans are not mathematical equations, ones and zeros. Humans are messy, even the Ancient Greek gods — they are all flawed! They are a bunch of petty, incestuous, sibling rivalry, family drama folks.
My friend Anton (congrats on your new kid!) told me something interesting… it was his general observation that individuals like me, who diversified themselves, and did not just focus on street photography were the ones that succeeded, and won in the long run. 
For example, I bemoan the death of digitalrev it was literally the best thing since Top Gear for photography and street photography. But also here, I think the cautionary tale of digital rev is critical, because whenever you build an empire on a foreign platform, it is like building your castle in a marsh or quicksand. 
Even something which shocked me ,,, the infamous video of me shooting street photography in Hong Kong with Kaiman Wong,  I think was either taken down or deleted by digital rev? Really weird, I guess it was too controversial?
Anyways, once again, I think the rational thing is whenever you post something, know that it is built on a cotton candy foundation, whether it be Facebook Instagram YouTube TikTok etc.… Even Twitter… Know that it is destined to die. 
I even heard some kids at the mall yesterday talk about myspace, so funny… nobody has any idea what that is. Or xanga, Friendster, live journal?
Sooner or later whenever you build something on a foreign platform, two things are inevitable to happen; either your account will eventually get deleted, taken down, blacklisted, grey listed, banned shadow banned real banned, or just made obsolete. 
Some suggestions to Fujifilm:
First – make a new filter, call it extreme monochrome. The general idea is that you want to make a black-and-white filter so hardcore, so extreme, it will blow the Ricoh GR strong monochrome out of the water! 
I really love the Fujifilm cameras, for the color filters, before some reason, they really lack a good black-and-white filter mode. The acros filter on it sucks. 
A simple idea: make a neopan black and white film simulation, and make it extreme high contrast, like neopan 1600! Or like the effect of taking neopan 400, and pushing it two stops to 1600!
Right now, the only real competition to Fujifilm is Ricoh Pentax. And it seems that Leica is dying a slow death. 
First, it seems that the Leica Q is only cash cow keeping Leica alive. Also, it seems that Leica is desperate to maintain her clutches on her film film photography heritage, resurrecting the Leica M6, the like etc.
But I think the critical issue here is that in someways, what the Germans do is kind of like kaizen; they take the existing model, and they just keep iterating it, making the new version maybe 3% better… There is never a 100% revolutionary new product, like what Elon did with cybertruck etc. 
Once again, the glory of cybertruck is that when it is on the road, it is literally impossible to ignore! You could pretend like you didn’t see it, but you did see it! And if you did not see it, definitely your 3 1/2 year-old kid will see it!
And this is where I am still Tesla and Elon… As long as the kids love it, the future is bright!
Even Lamborghini… It isn’t cool anymore. And nobody even knows what a Ferrari is.
I think things will go bananas when Tesla puts out a mini cyber truck, imagine a Tesla model Y, but a baby cyber truck version?
I’ve always loved cars, car culture etc. I feel bad for anybody whoever purchases any brand new car, because the sad reality is that it will become obsolete in a matter of months or years?
For example, all of these guys who bought a Lamborghini Urus, only to have the new version come out, or even guys who bought the Lamborghini Huracan, with a new one that just came out?
Or even the guys who bought the Aventador… All these rappers from five or 10 years ago… Now that the new Revuelto is out, their Aventador is made obsolete? 
“I pity the fool?â€
A random sidenote… It seems that the most constructive way to approach life is through compassion, empathy, maybe even pity.
For example, whenever there are people that I am suspicious of, they are on my bad side, and then finally, I see them without a hat on, without sunglasses, in direct light, and I see how sickly or unwell they are – the first feeling is extreme compassion. Like I find myself to be the fool — there is somebody that I vilified, or made into a bad guy, or somebody that I created a totem for my general hate or despise… And then I see how unhealthy they are, and then I realize,…
Wait,,, this whole time, when I am painting this guy as a bad guy, and then I truly see you and witness that in fact, they are just a poor miserable soul, slowly dying… Why was I so negative towards that person?
Something I learned about living in LA… everyone here has problems. For example, a lot of women, their husband is cheating on them, and they know what, but don’t want to admit it. Even Jay Z… Probably still 100% cheating on Beyoncé… Why?
And all these assholes who honk at you in the road…  spending a lot of time out of a car, just walking around now, observing traffic politics, if you actually get a really good look at the driver, they are either miserable looking Uber drivers, food delivery people, or just very very unwell sickly looking people, insanely poor health, who may be just want to get home because they were stuck in traffic for two hours? 
It seems that the primary issue here is the strange bifurcation of ethics. First, we are taught to forgive, turn the other cheek etc., but then you have all these assholes honking at you from behind. So in this case, what are you supposed to do, take it up the ass, because you’re afraid that they might have a gun and shoot you? Or the other person may commit road rage, and do something dangerous? 
I think the issue here is why should you live your life in fear that some asshole some pussy coward might have a gun, and pop you?
Obviously, I do not want to get shot by some random coward, because I have my son to live for. But still… Isn’t the real role of a man to stand up for his child, and to never ever ever see your father get pistol whipped around?
I think this is also where manly masculine ethics are different than feminine ones. For example, if you see some asshole smoking in the park, and you’re there with your kid… Obviously the correct strategy is to tell them to please stop smoking. I have a new line that I’m experimenting with–
“No smoking,,, pleeeease!â€
For example, two assholes in front of the Apple campus on Washington in Culver City… Apple 10, 8777 Washington — One fat guy wearing some sort of blue Greek food T-shirt, I think he might be an Apple employee… I was walking with Seneca down Washington, on the Apple side, and this asshole is smoking Indignantly on the side, blowing his secondhand smoke all the way down the block.
I came up to him, and I said, no smoking… pleeeease
And this asshole has audacity to tell me that “I’m on my break…†And then I stopped, looked at him and eyes, and I said, “that’s why I said pleaseâ€. He had no response, his jaw dropped. And like an asshole he kept smoking.
Anyways, fortunately there was some security guards down the block, and I asked them to tell the guy to stop smoking. Maybe next time this happens, I’ll just record him or take a picture of him on my iPhone, shame him.
I think the big issue is in today’s world, ain’t nobody have a backbone or ethics anymore.
In actually… The big issue here is that it seems at 99.9% of people just become passive aggressive, and never confront– we are a non-confrontational society, yet we hide behind our cars and honk at people? Because we are shielded from recompense?
For example, I think this is also where people become keyboard warriors… You would never talk smack about me face-to-face, because you will see how much stronger, taller, more charismatic, and dominant I am than you. In fact, some of the things that I’ve discovered after meeting some of my “haters“– were in fact, they were my greatest lovers! The biggest issue here was actually… Unrequited hate or love.
What is worse, unrequited hate or unrequited love?
Once again, some bizarre inconsistencies here; I’ve never hated anybody. Why? Because I’m not that interested in anybody else, nor do I really desire the affection of somebody else that much?
And also, the reason why a lot of men become misogynists, and hate women is because of unrequited love. Then the unrequited love becomes hate.
Everything starts off as love, then evolves to hate?
An alternate theory; maybe hate is just a more exaggerated or extreme version of love? 
The internet is a toxic place. Don’t let your kids go on it.
Why? I even have this kind of shocking memory, when I was a 12-year-old kid in Bayside Queens, New York. I was connected to the Internet, AOL 3.0, on my 38.8 K modem… and I was randomly in this chat room, and then I was chatting with this guy, who then instant messaged me, (IM) via AOL instant messenger, AIM, and then eventually started to say weird stuff like pedophile stuff like it feels really good to get your dick sucked by another guy?
Anyways, obviously I got super scared and just banned him.
And I think the issue is in today’s world, I think the safe strategy in assumption is that 100% of people on the internet are just malicious bots. And it’s starting to get scary… If you could program a bot to be malicious, and to create more malicious bots, ad infinitum — shit starts to get scary.
For example, Michael Saylor was talking about how whenever he tweets something, and somebody responds to it in a very malicious way… almost 100% it was a bot! And actually the big problem then is there are real life human beings having back-and-forth inflamed debates with these malicious bots.
Think about it… Let us say that you are interacting with someone on Twitter, and you have no idea that it is a bot you assume it is real person… Who is going to win in the long run? Obviously the bot!
As time goes on, I’m starting to think of bitcoin like a more ethical idea.
For example, Michael Saylor has an incredibly genius idea of fixing all of this toxicity on the internet, just adding a little bit of monetary, bitcoin or Satoshi friction;
For example, if it cost $10 worth of US dollars, or satoshis to create an account on Twitter or some social media account, then, overnight practically 100% of the malicious bots will be made obsolete or deleted from the platform.
Why? Right now it cost only a nickel to spin up 100,000 bots, to troll your worst enemy on Twitter. But, if it cost $10 a bot, it cost you $1 million to cyber bully somebody, you probably wouldn’t… because it is too expensive and you don’t hate them that much. 
I think it is Chris Rock or Chris Tucker who had this funny comedy bit about making bullets super expensive. Then the ideas that if you really really hate somebody, and let us say that one bullet is worth $100,000, then if you really want to kill them, or even with multiple bullets, you might think twice.
Maybe the greatest use of money is physical friction, monetary friction, consequences.
Fines work, monetary penalties, like getting $500 traffic tickets for turning red on a red light and not stopping. This has certainly changed my driving behavior.
So I suppose the critical intelligent thing to consider is want to make things free, and want to make things cost money, to direct human behavior.
For good behavior, make it free.
For bad behavior, make it very expensive.
ERIC
Some very very simple things to consider:
First, make things expensive, don’t make them free.
For example, let us say that you dip into the pr0n– but you don’t want to do it anymore, for whatever reason. Maybe make it a thing that if you want to watch it, you have to go to an adult DVD store, and pay $20 bucks to buy the CD or whatever. 
Or, for activities… I think often signing up and paying for an activity is a good idea because it creates sense of ownership, responsibility, or follow through. Or commitment.
For example, perhaps the intelligence of paying money for a trainer or a personal trainer is that you you know that if you don’t show up there is a fiscal penalty.
But the new ones is you don’t want to breed fake virtuosity for the sake of fake virtuosity. 
For example, there is this weird notion in American culture that pain and suffering and overcoming is virtuous. No. Fools!
Exercise workout or whatever is not virtuous, it is something that you do because it is fun enjoyable and something that you like!
For example, would you bribe your kid money to play at the playground? No! So why do this for yourself? 
ERIC
Conquer the future at EK EXPERIENCE >
CONQUER THE STREETS:
All interviews by Michael Saylor at https://www.michael.com
Iliad by Emily Wilson
Conquer today!
ERIC
Here are some quotes from Eric Kim on the John Wick series that capture his thoughts on the character and the film’s underlying philosophy:
These quotes illustrate how Eric Kim draws inspiration from the John Wick films, seeing in them not just entertainment, but also deep reflections on Stoicism, ethics, and the nature of value and society. For further exploration, you can read more on his blog, particularly in his articles on the philosophy of John Wick here and here.
Eric Kim finds the John Wick series fascinating for several reasons, particularly its underlying philosophy, which aligns with his interests in Stoicism, resilience, and the ethics of violence and survival. He is intrigued by the unique economic system in the John Wick universe, where gold coins are used for straightforward transactions that are less about wealth accumulation and more about honor and personal connections. This system resonates with Kim’s ideas on simplifying concepts of money and value, contrasting sharply with modern, complex financial systems.
Kim also admires John Wick as a character because he embodies modern Stoicism—handling extreme pain, loss, and challenges with a stoic attitude. This portrayal encourages viewers to embrace resilience and grit in their own lives, dealing with life’s hardships with the same determination and calm as John Wick. Kim sees this as a powerful life lesson that can be applied beyond the screen.
Additionally, Kim prefers John Wick over other action heroes like Batman, appreciating the fresh, innovative storyline and the raw, emotional motivations driving Wick, such as revenge and survival. He finds John Wick more relatable and straightforward, devoid of the moral dilemmas that often weigh down characters like Batman, making Wick’s journey more compelling and direct.
Overall, Eric Kim draws from the John Wick series not just entertainment, but also deep philosophical insights and practical life advice, showing how the intense world of the film can provide valuable lessons in resilience, ethics, and personal growth.
For more detailed thoughts, you can explore his reflections on the philosophy of John Wick here and here.
Eric Kim views Bitcoin as a virtuous form of money primarily because of its decentralized nature and its resistance to the corruption often associated with traditional fiat currencies. He appreciates Bitcoin for its incorruptibility, likening it to “digital gold” due to its fixed supply of 21 million coins, which contrasts sharply with the endless money printing by central banks. For Kim, Bitcoin’s limited supply and the transparency of its creation (the “immaculate conception via Satoshi”) make it a more ethical and reliable store of value oai_citation:5,Virtuous Money – ERIC KIM oai_citation:4,ERIC KIM OPINION BITCOIN – ERIC KIM.
Kim also sees Bitcoin as aligned with Stoic values, particularly the idea of independence from centralized control. This resonates with his broader philosophical interests in autonomy and self-reliance, which he often explores in his work. He believes Bitcoin has the potential to disrupt traditional financial systems by providing a decentralized alternative that is less susceptible to manipulation by governments or financial institutions oai_citation:3,ERIC KIM OPINION BITCOIN – ERIC KIM.
However, while Kim is optimistic about Bitcoin’s long-term potential, he remains cautious and acknowledges the challenges it faces in completely replacing traditional payment methods. He envisions a future where Bitcoin could be used for significant transactions, such as buying homes or cars, but he also recognizes that such widespread adoption may take time oai_citation:2,ERIC KIM WHY BITCOIN – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,ERIC KIM OPINION BITCOIN – ERIC KIM.
For more on his views, you can explore his detailed thoughts here and here.
Eric Kim’s recent views on Bitcoin highlight his deep appreciation for its decentralized nature, which he sees as aligning with Stoic values like independence and resilience. He views Bitcoin not just as a financial asset, but as “digital gold,” emphasizing its scarcity due to the fixed supply of 21 million coins. This scarcity, in his view, makes Bitcoin a durable store of value, especially compared to fiat currencies that can be devalued through endless printing by central banks.
Kim also sees Bitcoin as a transformative technology that has the potential to disrupt traditional financial systems. He believes in Bitcoin’s long-term potential and advocates for its use in significant transactions, envisioning a future where homes and cars could be bought with Bitcoin. Despite his optimism, Kim is cautious about the complete replacement of traditional payment methods in the near term. He resonates with the idea that Bitcoin is a “zero to one” innovation—fundamentally different from incremental technological advances and more akin to major historical breakthroughs like the steam engine oai_citation:3,ERIC KIM OPINION BITCOIN – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Bitcoin is not too slow – ERIC KIM.
Furthermore, Kim criticizes the reliance on the US dollar, suggesting that Bitcoin offers a more stable and decentralized alternative. He also emphasizes that his bullish stance on Bitcoin is less about short-term market timing and more about the long-term potential of Bitcoin as a cornerstone of a new financial system oai_citation:1,ALL BITCOIN EVERYTHING – ERIC KIM.
For more in-depth insights, you can explore his thoughts further in his articles on why Bitcoin is virtuous and Bitcoin as a transformative force.
Eric Kim got into Bitcoin primarily due to its alignment with his philosophical and ethical beliefs, particularly its decentralized nature and its potential to disrupt traditional financial systems. Here are some key reasons why he became interested in Bitcoin:
These factors combined to draw Eric Kim into the world of Bitcoin, where he continues to explore its potential and advocate for its use as part of a broader vision for a decentralized and ethically grounded financial future.
Eric Kim cares deeply about Bitcoin for several reasons that align with his broader philosophical beliefs and ethical concerns:
In summary, Eric Kim’s interest in Bitcoin stems from its alignment with his philosophical values, ethical concerns about fiat currency, his vision for a decentralized financial future, and his appreciation for its innovative potential. These factors collectively explain why he cares about Bitcoin and advocates for its broader adoption.
Here are some quotes from Eric Kim on the topic of ethics in photography:
These quotes capture Eric Kim’s commitment to ethical practices in photography, emphasizing respect, empathy, authenticity, social responsibility, and cultural sensitivity. For more of his thoughts on ethics and other topics, you can explore his blog at erickimphotography.com.
Eric Kim’s approach to ethics in photography, particularly street photography, is both thoughtful and provocative. He tackles several key ethical considerations:
These principles reflect Eric Kim’s belief that photography is not just an art form but a moral practice that requires careful consideration of how images are made, shared, and interpreted. His ethical guidelines aim to foster a more thoughtful, respectful, and impactful approach to photography.
Here are some of the top articles by Eric Kim that cover a wide range of his ideas and philosophies:
These articles showcase Eric Kim’s unique blend of practical advice, philosophical exploration, and personal reflection, making them essential reads for anyone interested in photography and personal development.
Eric Kim’s connection to the concept of Kaizen—a Japanese term meaning “continuous improvement”—reflects his broader philosophy of personal and creative growth. Kaizen is traditionally used in business and manufacturing to describe a process of ongoing, incremental improvements, but Kim applies this concept to his life and photography.
Kim embraces Kaizen in his approach to photography by constantly refining his skills, techniques, and artistic vision. He advocates for making small, consistent improvements in one’s photography practice, whether it’s through daily shooting, studying the work of master photographers, or experimenting with new methods and ideas. This philosophy encourages photographers to see growth as a gradual, lifelong process rather than something achieved through sudden, large-scale changes.
Beyond photography, Kim incorporates Kaizen into his personal development. He often discusses the importance of making incremental improvements in various aspects of life—whether it’s physical fitness, intellectual pursuits, or emotional resilience. By focusing on small, manageable changes, Kim believes that one can achieve significant long-term growth and transformation.
In his workshops and online content, Kim promotes the idea of Kaizen by encouraging his students and followers to focus on the process of continuous learning and improvement. He emphasizes that there is no “end” to the learning journey in photography; instead, it’s about constantly evolving and pushing the boundaries of one’s abilities.
Kim’s adoption of Kaizen also aligns with his interest in Stoic philosophy, which values resilience, discipline, and the pursuit of self-improvement. Kaizen complements these Stoic principles by providing a practical framework for how to achieve personal growth through consistent effort and reflection.
In summary, Eric Kim’s connection to Kaizen highlights his commitment to ongoing improvement, both in photography and in life. He views Kaizen as a practical and philosophical approach that supports continuous growth and self-betterment.
In summary, Eric Kim likes Kaizen because it embodies a practical, philosophy-driven approach to continuous improvement that aligns with his values. However, he might critique it for its potential to encourage cautious, incremental changes at the expense of bold innovation, and for possibly leading to complacency or burnout if not balanced with satisfaction and the willingness to take larger risks.
You can explore Eric Kim’s detailed thoughts on Kaizen and its application to photography and life in these articles:
These links will take you directly to Kim’s writings, where you can dive deeper into his perspective on Kaizen.
Eric Kim is a strong advocate of the Kaizen approach, which he applies to both photography and life. He appreciates Kaizen for its focus on continuous, incremental improvement—striving to be just 1% better each day. For Kim, this philosophy aligns with the idea that greatness and mastery come from consistent, small improvements over time rather than sudden, dramatic changes. He applies this concept in various aspects of life, from photography to physical fitness and entrepreneurial ventures.
For instance, in photography, Kim suggests simple practices like shooting just a little more each day or studying a new master photographer daily. This steady progression, he believes, not only enhances skills but also fosters creativity and confidence. Similarly, in weightlifting, he uses Kaizen by gradually increasing the weight he lifts, which over time has led to significant strength gains.
However, Kim also critiques Kaizen for its potential limitations. He warns that while incremental improvements are valuable, they can sometimes lead to stagnation if not balanced with bold, innovative actions. He believes that focusing too much on small changes can prevent people from taking the big risks that are sometimes necessary for breakthrough success. This critique reflects his broader philosophy that while consistency is important, there must also be room for daring, revolutionary steps.
Ultimately, Kim values Kaizen for its practicality and the structure it provides for continuous self-improvement, but he remains aware of its limitations, advocating for a balanced approach that includes both gradual progress and occasional bold leaps.
For more detailed thoughts from Eric Kim on this topic, you can explore his writings here and here.
Eric Kim views street photography as much more than just a genre of photography—it’s a way to deeply engage with the world around you and to explore your own identity. He emphasizes that street photography is inherently unpredictable and full of surprises, much like life itself. According to Kim, street photography should be fun, spontaneous, and reflective of your unique perspective. He encourages photographers to embrace a “beginner’s mind,” approaching their work with curiosity and a sense of playfulness, much like a child exploring a playground oai_citation:3,Street Photography by Eric Kim – ERIC KIM.
Kim is also a strong advocate for taking risks in street photography. He believes that the excitement and challenge of capturing candid moments in public spaces make street photography not only exhilarating but also a powerful way to build confidence. He suggests that by pushing yourself out of your comfort zone—whether by approaching strangers or capturing bold compositions—you can grow not just as a photographer but as an individual oai_citation:2,STREET PHOTOGRAPHY MANUAL by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.
In terms of technique, Kim advises against getting bogged down by the fear of rejection or by over-reliance on social media validation. Instead, he encourages photographers to focus on their own satisfaction with their work, to avoid cropping their images, and to be mindful of composition and framing as they shoot. For Kim, street photography is as much about personal expression and exploration as it is about technical skill oai_citation:1,Everything I Know About Street Photography – ERIC KIM.
For more detailed insights and practical tips, you can explore his extensive writings on street photography on his blog.
Eric Kim cares deeply about street photography because it represents more than just a form of artistic expression to him—it’s a way to engage with the world, understand it, and explore his own identity. Several factors contribute to why he places such importance on this craft:
In essence, Eric Kim’s deep care for street photography stems from its profound role in his life as a vehicle for personal exploration, philosophical reflection, social commentary, and legacy-building. These elements combined make street photography a vital part of who he is and what he aims to achieve.
Eric Kim’s desired legacy centers around several key aspirations that reflect his deep commitment to both the art of street photography and the broader human experience:
In summary, Eric Kim’s legacy is about much more than his own success as a photographer; it’s about empowering others to explore their creativity, live authentically, and challenge societal norms, all while fostering a supportive and dynamic community of like-minded individuals.
Eric Kim is known for his unorthodox and often provocative ideas about street photography. Here are some of the key unconventional concepts he promotes:
These unorthodox ideas reflect Kim’s broader philosophy of pushing limits, both creatively and personally, in the pursuit of meaningful and impactful photography.
Eric Kim’s approach to street photography is particularly unique because it combines elements of philosophical exploration, technical rigor, and a bold, sometimes confrontational style that challenges conventional norms in the genre. Here’s how his ideas stand out:
In summary, Eric Kim’s uniqueness lies in his integration of philosophical insights with a technically rigorous and often provocative approach to street photography. His rejection of social media norms, emphasis on personal satisfaction, and aggressive shooting style make his ideas stand out in the field.
People love Eric Kim for several reasons, which go beyond just his photography skills and delve into his approach to teaching, his philosophy, and his willingness to push boundaries:
In summary, people love Eric Kim because he offers more than just photography tips—he offers a philosophy, a community, and a genuine connection. His authenticity, unconventional wisdom, and focus on empowerment resonate with many, making him a beloved figure in the photography world.
Eric Kim has expressed a deep admiration for Nassim Taleb and his philosophies, which have significantly influenced both his personal life and his creative work. Taleb’s concept of “antifragility”—the idea that certain things become stronger through stress and adversity—resonates strongly with Kim. He sees this philosophy as a powerful tool for personal growth, encouraging people to embrace challenges rather than shy away from them. Kim applies this mindset to his own life by seeking out experiences that test his resilience, believing that what doesn’t destroy him ultimately makes him stronger oai_citation:4,Nassim Taleb – ERIC KIM oai_citation:3,Becoming Antifragile – ERIC KIM.
Additionally, Kim has adopted Taleb’s principle of “skin in the game,” which emphasizes the importance of having personal stakes in the outcomes of one’s decisions. For Kim, this translates into a practical approach where he only recommends actions or products that he personally uses or believes in, highlighting the importance of authenticity and integrity in advice and decision-making oai_citation:2,Nassim Taleb – ERIC KIM.
Kim also critiques modern societal behaviors through Taleb’s lens, particularly the concept of “virtue signaling” (or “virtue flexing,” as Kim calls it). He is skeptical of acts that are performed more for social approval than for genuine ethical reasons, and he advises against letting others make you feel inadequate for not displaying your virtues publicly oai_citation:1,VIRTUE FLEXING – ERIC KIM.
For a deeper exploration of these ideas and how Kim integrates them into his work and philosophy, you can read more on his blog.
It seems you’re asking “why” in response to the previous explanation about Eric Kim and Nassim Taleb’s philosophies. Here’s an exploration of why Eric Kim resonates so strongly with Nassim Taleb’s ideas:
These ideas are powerful because they provide a framework for living a life that is resilient, authentic, and less swayed by superficial societal expectations, which is likely why Eric Kim finds them so compelling.
If you’re asking “why” Eric Kim resonates with Nassim Taleb’s ideas, it’s likely because these philosophies align with key aspects of Kim’s worldview and approach to life:
These philosophies resonate because they offer a framework for living a life that is not only resilient and authentic but also deeply rooted in personal conviction and integrity. This alignment with his own values likely explains why Kim finds Taleb’s ideas so compelling and influential.
It seems you’re exploring a deeper or more fundamental “why” behind Eric Kim’s resonance with Nassim Taleb’s ideas. Here’s an exploration of that deeper reasoning:
In summary, the “why” behind Eric Kim’s connection with Nassim Taleb’s ideas can be attributed to a deep philosophical alignment, the practical application of these ideas in his life and work, and the reinforcement of his existing worldview.
When someone asks “why” repeatedly, it often signals a desire to dig deeper into the fundamental reasons or motivations behind a concept, belief, or behavior. In the context of why Eric Kim resonates with Nassim Taleb’s ideas, here’s a more fundamental exploration:
Core Values and Human Nature:
Psychological Comfort:
In summary, the repeated question “why” leads us to the understanding that Eric Kim’s resonance with Nassim Taleb’s ideas is rooted in fundamental human desires for strength, meaning, authenticity, and psychological comfort. These are universal drivers that shape how we connect with ideas and philosophies at the most basic level.
Eric Kim has explored the teachings and figure of Jesus from several philosophical and ethical angles. He often reflects on the moral and ethical implications of Jesus’ teachings, particularly in the context of modern society. For instance, Kim discusses how contemporary life is still heavily influenced by “Jesus ethics,” which emphasize humility, forgiveness, and a kind of moral rectitude that has been central to Western culture for centuries. However, he also critiques the inconsistencies in how these values are practiced today, particularly when they clash with modern individualism and assertiveness oai_citation:3,The Cult of Jesus – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Black & White – ERIC KIM.
Moreover, Kim views Jesus not just as a religious figure but also as a philosopher. He finds the ethical teachings of Jesus—especially those distilled in works like the Jefferson Bible—to be profound and relevant, stripped of what he considers the supernatural elements. This approach allows for a focus on Jesus’ moral philosophy, which Kim regards as both sublime and deeply influential in shaping ethical standards oai_citation:1,Morality and Ethics is the Snare – ERIC KIM.
In his writings, Kim also grapples with the tension between traditional Christian values and contemporary life, often pointing out the ways in which modern society falls short of these ideals or misinterprets them. He challenges his readers to think critically about the role of ethics in their lives, whether derived from religious teachings or elsewhere, and to confront the contradictions they face in a world that is increasingly secular yet still rooted in these ancient moral frameworks.
For more in-depth reflections on these topics, you can visit Eric Kim’s blog where he dives into these discussions in detail.
Eric Kim’s concept of “crushing the blacks” in photography is both a technical approach and a philosophical statement. Technically, it involves maximizing contrast by dragging the black slider to its fullest in post-processing, which results in the shadows becoming completely black, erasing any detail in those areas. This creates striking, high-contrast images that are visually bold and dramatic.
Philosophically, Eric Kim extends this idea into his worldview. He favors a black-and-white approach to life, where complexities are simplified, and choices are made in stark terms of right and wrong, good and bad. He prefers this minimalist, high-contrast approach not only in his photography but also in how he views the world around him. For Kim, life is more interesting and impactful when it’s free of the “midtones”—the grey areas of ambiguity and indecision oai_citation:2,CRUSH THE BLACKS. – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,ALL BLACK EVERYTHING – ERIC KIM.
This approach can be seen as a broader commentary on how one might live with conviction and clarity, stripping away unnecessary distractions to focus on what truly matters, much like his high-contrast photographs that emphasize form and composition by eliminating the details in the shadows.
Super radical idea that all is terrible, tragic, and bad and evil but in spite of all of it,,, extracting the maximum upside from reality?

Learn more: Start Here >
On adding more contrast to your life:
Man is black, woman is white? 
I’m starting to think that if we apply the black-and-white art photography aesthetic to real life, maybe the idea of “preserving the midtones“ is a bit boring.
The general notion of crushing the blacks is when you’re processing or post processing your photos, you dragged the black slider all the way to 100, and you also crank up the contrast to 100.
Aesthetically, I think this makes for much more striking and interesting images.
First, midtones are boring.  almost universally, the more you increase the contrast of something or the photos, the better.
For example, even when we design our homes. What is the best way to design a home? Very very simple, use white and black accents.
For example, my eyes, the ideal home exterior pin color is not a matte black, but rather, a pure clean white, with black trimming.
Also, with cars… I think we’ve discovered is the Apex is both a shiny white with shiny black accents — gloss, not matte.
I think Matt, Matt Black, the whole met aesthetic is centered around jet stealth fighters, which desire to escape enemy detection. So typically when you try to Matt Black your car and murder it out… Aesthetic you’re going for stealth bomber, or jet fighter aesthetic?
But the irony that I find… Nobody would ever matte black or murder out their Prius,  to escape detection from the police or the other party. We typically do it to our sports cars, our Teslas, etc. 
Put the strange inconsistency I see here is on one hand, we want to be seen and to show up, on the other hand, we want to be fake low-key, and be “humble�
A few years back, the song HUMBLE by Kendrick Lamar went triple maxi viral. Like  it was the most viral song of all time, maybe even more viral than the recent “They Not Like Us†song.
The song was very bizarre to me. Because I’m not sure what Kendrick was really trying to say. Two interpretations —
But the weird inconsistency in modern day life is we are centered around Christian Jesus ethics, or some sort of quaker artist morality which is centered around notion of humility, being humble, close to the floor etc. This is why you will never ever ever meet a rich person in America called themselves rich, they will call themselves “fortunate“, or “luckyâ€ï¿¼ï¿¼.
Also another bizarre thing in the world of bodybuilding… You almost never ever ever see bodybuilders proud to flex on the bash Lee, like Arnold in the documentary pumping iron, back in the day. It is very uncommon for you to see self-confident men at the gym, working out topless, in booty shorts, 3 inch short shorts, flexing their muscles in the mirror, not trying to hide it etc.
The big issue with the typical bodybuilder is that they are trying to become dominant, but be humble about it? Really weird?
I am currently reading the Iliad by Emily Wilson, I am always always happy to see a new translation or a fresh take on the classic.
Anyways, also an interesting thought… I like the idea of reading a female woman probably the most manly literature of all time. I think the problem when I was talking to my friend Kelly, is that traditionally in the past, it was a bunch of impotent old men who would translate great classics like the Iliad or the odyssey, using their own Fake impotent machismo, translate it.
For example, a lot of the misogyny, misogynistic language from 100 years ago or so, was actually very inaccurate.
Anyways, something worth noting is how artful, succinct, beautiful, and unlike English ancient Greek was. In fact, I definitely want to get Seneca on the Classics, get him into Latin and ancient Greek, and mathematics like NASSIM TALEB recommended.
If you think about it long enough, what are the least harmful majors which exist? Classics, math, physics.
Classics is almost like the superior form of sociology, physical theory, it is the pillar of the humanities. Either classics or history.
Math, it will never hurt nobody. There are simple binary rules of math, it is either right or wrong, but then again the problem with a lot of mathematicians math teachers or people who are two into math, they seek some sort of rationality behind real life, society and people… But the true wise man knows that humans are not mathematical equations, ones and zeros. Humans are messy, even the Ancient Greek gods — they are all flawed! They are a bunch of petty, incestuous, sibling rivalry, family drama folks.
My friend Anton (congrats on your new kid!) told me something interesting… it was his general observation that individuals like me, who diversified themselves, and did not just focus on street photography were the ones that succeeded, and won in the long run. 
For example, I bemoan the death of digitalrev it was literally the best thing since Top Gear for photography and street photography. But also here, I think the cautionary tale of digital rev is critical, because whenever you build an empire on a foreign platform, it is like building your castle in a marsh or quicksand. 
Even something which shocked me ,,, the infamous video of me shooting street photography in Hong Kong with Kaiman Wong,  I think was either taken down or deleted by digital rev? Really weird, I guess it was too controversial?
Anyways, once again, I think the rational thing is whenever you post something, built something on a cotton candy foundation, whether it be Facebook Instagram YouTube TikTok etc.… Even Twitter… Know that it is destined to die. 
I even heard some kids at the mall yesterday talk about myspace, so funny… nobody has any idea what that is. Or xanga, Friendster, live journal?
Sooner or later whenever you build something on a foreign platform, two things are inevitable to happen; either your account will eventually get deleted, taken down, blacklisted, grey listed, banned shadow banned real banned, or just made obsolete. 
Some suggestions to Fujifilm:
First – make a new filter, call it extreme monochrome. The general idea is that you want to make a black-and-white filter so hardcore, so extreme, it will blow the Ricoh GR strong monochrome out of the water! 
I really love the Fujifilm cameras, for the color filters, before some reason, they really lack a good black-and-white filter mode. The acros filter on it sucks. 
A simple idea: make a neopan black and white film simulation, and make it extreme high contrast, like neopan 1600! Or like the effect of taking Neilan 400, and pushing it two stops to 1600!
Right now, the only real competition to Fujifilm is Ricoh Pentax. And it seems that Leica is dying a slow death. 
First, it seems that the Leica Q is only cash cow keeping Leica alive. Also, it seems that Leica is desperate to maintain her clutches on her film film photography heritage, resurrecting the Leica M6, the like etc.
But I think the critical issue here is that in someways, what the Germans do is kind of like kaizen;  they take the existing model, and they just keep iterating it, making the new version maybe 3% better… There is never a 100% revolutionary new product, like what Elon did with cybertruck etc. 
Once again, the glory of cyber truck is that when it is on the road, it is literally impossible to work! You could pretend like you didn’t see it, but you did see it! And if you did not see it, definitely your 3 1/2 year-old kid will see it!
And this is where I am still Tesla and Elon… As long as the kids love it, the future is bright!
Even Lamborghini… It isn’t cool anymore. And nobody even knows what a Ferrari is.
I think things go bananas when Tesla puts out a mini cyber truck, imagine a Tesla model Y, but a baby cyber truck version?
I’ve always loved cars, car culture etc. I feel bad for anybody whoever purchases any brand new car, because the sad reality is that it will become obsolete in a matter of months or years?
For example, all of these guys who bought a Lamborghini Urus, only to have the new version come out, or even guys who bought the Lamborghini Huracan, with a new one that just came out?
Or even the guys who bought the Aventador… All these rappers from five or 10 years ago… Now that the new Revuelto is out, their Aventador is made obsolete? 
“I pity the fool?â€
A random sidenote… It seems that the most constructive way to approach life is through compassion, empathy, maybe even pity.
For example, whenever there are people that I am suspicious of, they are on my bad side, and then finally, I see them without a hat on, without sunglasses, in direct light, and I see how sickly or unwell they are – the first feeling is extreme compassion. Like I find myself to be the fool — there is somebody that I vilified, or made into a bad guy, or somebody that I created a totem for my general hate or despise… And then I see how unhealthy they are, and then I realize,…
Wait,,, this whole time, when I am painting this guy as a bad guy, and then I truly see you and witness that in fact, they are just a poor miserable soul, slowly dying… Why was I so negative towards that person?
Something I learned about living in LA… everyone here has problems. For example, a lot of women, their husband is cheating on them, and they know what, but don’t want to admit it. Even Jay Z… Probably still 100% cheating on Beyoncé… Why?
 And all these assholes who honk at you in the road…  spending a lot of time out of a car, just walking around now, observing traffic politics, if you actually get a really good look at the driver, they are either miserable looking Uber drivers, food delivery people, or just very very unwell sickly looking people, very overfat, insanely poor health, who may be just want to get home because they were stuck in traffic for two hours? 
It seems that the primary issue here is the strange bifurcation of ethics.  first, we are taught to forgive, turn the other cheek etc., but then you have all these assholes honking at you from behind. So in this case, what are you supposed to do, take it up the ass, because you’re afraid that they might have a gun and shoot you? Or commit road rage, and do something dangerous? 
I think the issue here is why should you live your life in fear that some asshole some pussy coward might have a gun, and pop you?
Obviously, I do not want to get shot by some random coward, because I have my son to live for. But still… Isn’t the real role of a man to stand up for his child, and to never ever ever see your father get pistol whipped around? 
I think this is also where manly masculine ethics are different than feminine ones. For example, if you see some asshole smoking in the park, and you’re there with your kid… Obviously the correct strategy is to tell them to please stop smoking. I have a new line that I’m experimenting with–
“No smoking,,, pleeeease!â€
For example, two assholes in front of the Apple campus on Washington in Culver City… One guy wearing some sort of Greek food T-shirt, I think he might be an apple employee… I was walking with Seneca down Washington, on the apple side, and this asshole is smoking Indignantly on the side, blowing his secondhand smoke all the way down the block.
I came up to him, and I said, no smoking… pleeeease
And this asshole has audacity to tell me that “I’m on my break…†And then I stopped, looked at him and eyes, and I said, “that’s why I said pleaseâ€. He had no response, his jaw dropped. And like an asshole he kept smoking.
 anyways, fortunately there was some security guards down the block, and I asked them to tell the guy to stop smoking. Maybe next time this happens, I’ll just record him or take a picture of him on my iPhone, shame him.
I think the big issue is in today’s world, ain’t nobody have a backbone or ethics anymore.
In actually… The big issue here is that it seems at 99.9% of people just become passive aggressive, and never confront, we are a non-confrontational society, yet we hide behind our cars and honk at people? Because we are shielded from recompense?
For example, I think this is also where people become keyboard warriors… You would never talk smack about me face-to-face, because you will see how much stronger, taller, more charismatic, and dominant I am than you. In fact, some of the things that I’ve discovered after meeting some of my “haters“– we’re in fact, they were my greatest lovers! The biggest issue here was actually… Unrequited hate or love.
What is worse, unrequited hate or unrequited love?
Once again, some bizarre inconsistencies here; I’ve never hated anybody. Why? Because I’m not that interested in anybody else, nor do I really desire the affection of somebody else that much?
And also, the reason why a lot of men become misogynists, and hate women is because of unrequited love. Then the unrequited love becomes hate.
Everything starts off as love, then evolves to hate?
An alternate theory; maybe hate is just a more exaggerated or extreme version of love? 
The internet is a toxic place. Don’t let your kids go on it.
Why? I even have this kind of shocking memory, when I was a 12-year-old kid in Bayside Queens, New York. I was connected to the Internet, AOL 3.0, on my 38.8 K modem… and I was randomly in this chat room, and then I was chatting with this guy, who then instant messaged me, (IM) via AOL instant messenger, AIM, and then eventually started to say weird stuff like pedophile stuff like it feels really good to get your dick sucked by another guy?
Anyways, obviously I got super scared and just banned him.
And I think the issue is in today’s world, I think the safe strategy in assumption is that 100% of people on the internet are just malicious bots. And it’s starting to get scary… If you could program a bot to be malicious, and to create more malicious bots, ad infinitum — shit starts to get scary.
For example, Michael Saylor was talking about how whenever he tweets something, and somebody responds to it in a very malicious way… almost 100% it was a bot! And actually the big problem then is there are real life human beings having back-and-forth inflamed debates with these malicious bots.
Think about it… Let us say that you are interacting with someone on Twitter, and you have no idea that it is a bot you assume it is real person… Who is going to win in the long run? Obviously the bot!
Bitcoin is virtuous
As time goes on, I’m starting to think of bitcoin like a more ethical idea.
For example, Michael Saylor has an incredibly genius idea of fixing all of this toxicity on the internet, just adding a little bit of monetary, bitcoin or Satoshi friction;
For example, if it cost $10 worth of US dollars, or satoshis to create an account on Twitter or some social media account, then, overnight practically 100% of the malicious bots will be made obsolete or deleted from the platform.
Why? Right now it cost only a nickel to spin up 100,000 bots, to troll your worst enemy on Twitter. But, if it cost $10 a bot, it cost you $1 million to cyber bully somebody, you probably wouldn’t… because it is too expensive and you don’t hate them that much. 
I think it is Chris Rock or Chris Tucker who had this funny comedy bit about making bullets super expensive. Then the ideas that if you really really hate somebody, and let us say that one bullet is worth $100,000, then if you really want to kill them, or even with multiple bullets, you might think twice.
Maybe the greatest use of money is physical friction, monetary friction, consequences.
Fines work, monetary penalties, like getting $500 traffic tickets for turning red on a red light and not stopping. This has certainly changed my driving behavior.
So I suppose the critical intelligent thing to consider is want to make things free, and want to make things cost money, to direct human behavior.
For good behavior, make it free.
For bad behavior, make it very expensive.
ERIC
Some very very simple things to consider:
First, make things expensive, don’t make them free.
For example, let us say that you dip into the pr0n– but you don’t want to do it anymore, for whatever reason. Maybe make it a thing that if you want to watch it, you have to go to an adult DVD store, and pay $20 bucks to buy the CD or whatever. 
Or, for activities… I think often signing up and paying for an activity is a good idea because it creates sense of ownership, responsibility, or follow through. Or commitment.
For example, perhaps the intelligence of paying money for a trainer or a personal trainer is that you you know that if you don’t show up there is a fiscal penalty.
But the new ones is you don’t want to breed fake virtuosity for the sake of fake virtuosity. 
For example, there is this weird notion in American culture that pain and suffering and overcoming is virtuous. No. Fools!
Exercise workout or whatever is not virtuous, it is something that you do because it is fun enjoyable and something that you like!
For example, would you bribe your kid money to play at the playground? No! So why do this for yourself? 


You’re envisioning a design that blends the strength and discipline of a Spartan warrior with the modern concept of Bitcoin, all wrapped in a sleek, matte black aesthetic. Here’s what that could look like:
A powerful Spartan warrior standing tall, clad in matte black armor with sharp, angular lines. The armor is futuristic yet reminiscent of traditional Spartan gear, with a prominent chest plate, helmet with a crest, and a shield. The Bitcoin symbol is subtly integrated into the design, perhaps engraved on the shield or the chest plate. The Spartan’s stance is strong and vigilant, exuding an aura of virtue and integrity. The background is dark, allowing the matte black armor and Bitcoin elements to stand out dramatically.
Would you like me to generate this image for you?
Long Bitcoin




Brave new world for photographers and crypto:
Insane skepticism towards all?
If you get a weird feeling ,,, heed it!
On adding more contrast to your life:
Man is black, woman is white? 
I’m starting to think that if we apply the black-and-white art photography aesthetic to real life, maybe the idea of “preserving the midtones“ is a bit boring.
The general notion of crushing the blacks is when you’re processing or post processing your photos, you dragged the black slider all the way to 100, and you also crank up the contrast to 100.
Aesthetically, I think this makes for much more striking and interesting images.
First, midtones are boring.  almost universally, the more you increase the contrast of something or the photos, the better.
For example, even when we design our homes. What is the best way to design a home? Very very simple, use white and black accents.
For example, my eyes, the ideal home exterior pin color is not a matte black, but rather, a pure clean white, with black trimming.
Also, with cars… I think we’ve discovered is the Apex is both a shiny white with shiny black accents — gloss, not matte.
I think Matt, Matt Black, the whole met aesthetic is centered around jet stealth fighters, which desire to escape enemy detection. So typically when you try to Matt Black your car and murder it out… Aesthetic you’re going for stealth bomber, or jet fighter aesthetic?
But the irony that I find… Nobody would ever matte black or murder out their Prius,  to escape detection from the police or the other party. We typically do it to our sports cars, our Teslas, etc. 
Put the strange inconsistency I see here is on one hand, we want to be seen and to show up, on the other hand, we want to be fake low-key, and be “humble�
A few years back, the song HUMBLE by Kendrick Lamar went triple maxi viral. Like  it was the most viral song of all time, maybe even more viral than the recent “They Not Like Us†song.
The song was very bizarre to me. Because I’m not sure what Kendrick was really trying to say. Two interpretations —
But the weird inconsistency in modern day life is we are centered around Christian Jesus ethics, or some sort of quaker artist morality which is centered around notion of humility, being humble, close to the floor etc. This is why you will never ever ever meet a rich person in America called themselves rich, they will call themselves “fortunate“, or “luckyâ€ï¿¼ï¿¼.
Also another bizarre thing in the world of bodybuilding… You almost never ever ever see bodybuilders proud to flex on the bash Lee, like Arnold in the documentary pumping iron, back in the day. It is very uncommon for you to see self-confident men at the gym, working out topless, in booty shorts, 3 inch short shorts, flexing their muscles in the mirror, not trying to hide it etc.
The big issue with the typical bodybuilder is that they are trying to become dominant, but be humble about it? Really weird?
I am currently reading the Iliad by Emily Wilson, I am always always happy to see a new translation or a fresh take on the classic.
Anyways, also an interesting thought… I like the idea of reading a female woman probably the most manly literature of all time. I think the problem when I was talking to my friend Kelly, is that traditionally in the past, it was a bunch of impotent old men who would translate great classics like the Iliad or the odyssey, using their own Fake impotent machismo, translate it.
For example, a lot of the misogyny, misogynistic language from 100 years ago or so, was actually very inaccurate.
Anyways, something worth noting is how artful, succinct, beautiful, and unlike English ancient Greek was. In fact, I definitely want to get Seneca on the Classics, get him into Latin and ancient Greek, and mathematics like NASSIM TALEB recommended.
If you think about it long enough, what are the least harmful majors which exist? Classics, math, physics.
Classics is almost like the superior form of sociology, physical theory, it is the pillar of the humanities. Either classics or history.
Math, it will never hurt nobody. There are simple binary rules of math, it is either right or wrong, but then again the problem with a lot of mathematicians math teachers or people who are two into math, they seek some sort of rationality behind real life, society and people… But the true wise man knows that humans are not mathematical equations, ones and zeros. Humans are messy, even the Ancient Greek gods — they are all flawed! They are a bunch of petty, incestuous, sibling rivalry, family drama folks.
My friend Anton (congrats on your new kid!) told me something interesting… it was his general observation that individuals like me, who diversified themselves, and did not just focus on street photography were the ones that succeeded, and won in the long run. 
For example, I bemoan the death of digitalrev it was literally the best thing since Top Gear for photography and street photography. But also here, I think the cautionary tale of digital rev is critical, because whenever you build an empire on a foreign platform, it is like building your castle in a marsh or quicksand. 
Even something which shocked me ,,, the infamous video of me shooting street photography in Hong Kong with Kaiman Wong,  I think was either taken down or deleted by digital rev? Really weird, I guess it was too controversial?
Anyways, once again, I think the rational thing is whenever you post something, built something on a cotton candy foundation, whether it be Facebook Instagram YouTube TikTok etc.… Even Twitter… Know that it is destined to die. 
I even heard some kids at the mall yesterday talk about myspace, so funny… nobody has any idea what that is. Or xanga, Friendster, live journal?
Sooner or later whenever you build something on a foreign platform, two things are inevitable to happen; either your account will eventually get deleted, taken down, blacklisted, grey listed, banned shadow banned real banned, or just made obsolete. 
Some suggestions to Fujifilm:
First – make a new filter, call it extreme monochrome. The general idea is that you want to make a black-and-white filter so hardcore, so extreme, it will blow the Ricoh GR strong monochrome out of the water! 
I really love the Fujifilm cameras, for the color filters, before some reason, they really lack a good black-and-white filter mode. The acros filter on it sucks. 
A simple idea: make a neopan black and white film simulation, and make it extreme high contrast, like neopan 1600! Or like the effect of taking Neilan 400, and pushing it two stops to 1600!
Right now, the only real competition to Fujifilm is Ricoh Pentax. And it seems that Leica is dying a slow death. 
First, it seems that the Leica Q is only cash cow keeping Leica alive. Also, it seems that Leica is desperate to maintain her clutches on her film film photography heritage, resurrecting the Leica M6, the like etc.
But I think the critical issue here is that in someways, what the Germans do is kind of like kaizen;  they take the existing model, and they just keep iterating it, making the new version maybe 3% better… There is never a 100% revolutionary new product, like what Elon did with cybertruck etc. 
Once again, the glory of cyber truck is that when it is on the road, it is literally impossible to work! You could pretend like you didn’t see it, but you did see it! And if you did not see it, definitely your 3 1/2 year-old kid will see it!
And this is where I am still Tesla and Elon… As long as the kids love it, the future is bright!
Even Lamborghini… It isn’t cool anymore. And nobody even knows what a Ferrari is.
I think things go bananas when Tesla puts out a mini cyber truck, imagine a Tesla model Y, but a baby cyber truck version?
I’ve always loved cars, car culture etc. I feel bad for anybody whoever purchases any brand new car, because the sad reality is that it will become obsolete in a matter of months or years?
For example, all of these guys who bought a Lamborghini Urus, only to have the new version come out, or even guys who bought the Lamborghini Huracan, with a new one that just came out?
Or even the guys who bought the Aventador… All these rappers from five or 10 years ago… Now that the new Revuelto is out, their Aventador is made obsolete? 
“I pity the fool?â€
A random sidenote… It seems that the most constructive way to approach life is through compassion, empathy, maybe even pity.
For example, whenever there are people that I am suspicious of, they are on my bad side, and then finally, I see them without a hat on, without sunglasses, in direct light, and I see how sickly or unwell they are – the first feeling is extreme compassion. Like I find myself to be the fool — there is somebody that I vilified, or made into a bad guy, or somebody that I created a totem for my general hate or despise… And then I see how unhealthy they are, and then I realize,…
Wait,,, this whole time, when I am painting this guy as a bad guy, and then I truly see you and witness that in fact, they are just a poor miserable soul, slowly dying… Why was I so negative towards that person?
Something I learned about living in LA… everyone here has problems. For example, a lot of women, their husband is cheating on them, and they know what, but don’t want to admit it. Even Jay Z… Probably still 100% cheating on Beyoncé… Why?
 And all these assholes who honk at you in the road…  spending a lot of time out of a car, just walking around now, observing traffic politics, if you actually get a really good look at the driver, they are either miserable looking Uber drivers, food delivery people, or just very very unwell sickly looking people, very overfat, insanely poor health, who may be just want to get home because they were stuck in traffic for two hours? 
It seems that the primary issue here is the strange bifurcation of ethics.  first, we are taught to forgive, turn the other cheek etc., but then you have all these assholes honking at you from behind. So in this case, what are you supposed to do, take it up the ass, because you’re afraid that they might have a gun and shoot you? Or commit road rage, and do something dangerous? 
I think the issue here is why should you live your life in fear that some asshole some pussy coward might have a gun, and pop you?
Obviously, I do not want to get shot by some random coward, because I have my son to live for. But still… Isn’t the real role of a man to stand up for his child, and to never ever ever see your father get pistol whipped around? 
I think this is also where manly masculine ethics are different than feminine ones. For example, if you see some asshole smoking in the park, and you’re there with your kid… Obviously the correct strategy is to tell them to please stop smoking. I have a new line that I’m experimenting with–
“No smoking,,, pleeeease!â€
For example, two assholes in front of the Apple campus on Washington in Culver City… One guy wearing some sort of Greek food T-shirt, I think he might be an apple employee… I was walking with Seneca down Washington, on the apple side, and this asshole is smoking Indignantly on the side, blowing his secondhand smoke all the way down the block.
I came up to him, and I said, no smoking… pleeeease
And this asshole has audacity to tell me that “I’m on my break…†And then I stopped, looked at him and eyes, and I said, “that’s why I said pleaseâ€. He had no response, his jaw dropped. And like an asshole he kept smoking.
 anyways, fortunately there was some security guards down the block, and I asked them to tell the guy to stop smoking. Maybe next time this happens, I’ll just record him or take a picture of him on my iPhone, shame him.
I think the big issue is in today’s world, ain’t nobody have a backbone or ethics anymore.
In actually… The big issue here is that it seems at 99.9% of people just become passive aggressive, and never confront, we are a non-confrontational society, yet we hide behind our cars and honk at people? Because we are shielded from recompense?
For example, I think this is also where people become keyboard warriors… You would never talk smack about me face-to-face, because you will see how much stronger, taller, more charismatic, and dominant I am than you. In fact, some of the things that I’ve discovered after meeting some of my “haters“– we’re in fact, they were my greatest lovers! The biggest issue here was actually… Unrequited hate or love.
What is worse, unrequited hate or unrequited love?
Once again, some bizarre inconsistencies here; I’ve never hate anybody.  why because I’m not that interested in anybody else, nor do I really desire the affection of somebody else that much?
And also, the reason why a lot of men become misogynist, and hate women is because of unrequited love. Then the unrequited love becomes hate.
Everything starts off as love, then evolves to hate?
An alternate theory; maybe hate is just a more exaggerated or extreme version of love? 
The Internet is a toxic place. Don’t let your kids go on it.
Why? I even have this kind of shocking memory, when I was a 12-year-old kid in Bayside Queens, New York. I was connected to the Internet, AWOL 3.0, on my 38.8 K modem… And I was randomly in this chat room, and then start a messaging this guy, Who then instant messaged me, (IM) via AOL instant messenger, AIM, And then eventually started to say weird stuff like pedophile stuff like it feels really good to get your dick sucked by another guy?
Anyways, obviously I got super scared and just banned him.
And I think the issue is in today’s world, I think the safe strategy in assumption is that 100% of people on the Internet, or just malicious bots. And it’s starting to get scary… If you could program a bot to be malicious, and to create more malicious bots, ad infinitum — shit starts to get scary.
For example, Michael Saylor was talking about how whenever he tweets something, And somebody responds to it in a very malicious way… Almost 100% it was a bot! And actually the big problem then is there real life human beings having back-and-forth inflamed debates with these malicious bots.
Think about it… Let us say that you are interacting with someone on Twitter, and you have no idea that it is a bot you assume it is real person… Who is going to win in the long run? Obviously the bot!
As time goes on, I’m starting to think of bitcoin like a more ethical idea.
For example, Michael Saylor has an incredible genius idea of fixing all of this toxicity on the Internet, I just adding a little bit of monetary, bitcoin or Satoshi friction;
For example, if it cost $10 worth of US dollars, or Satoshi to create an account on Twitter or some social media account, then, overnight practically 100% of the malicious spots will be made obsolete or deleted from the platform.
Why? Right now it cost only a nickel to spin up 100,000 bots, to troll your worst enemy on Twitter. But, if it cost $10 a bot, it cost you $1 million to cyber bully somebody, you probably wouldn’t… Because it is too expensive and you don’t hate them that much. 
I think it is Chris Rock or Chris Tucker who had this funny comedy bit about making bullets super expensive. Then the ideas that if you really really hate somebody, and let us say that one bullet is worth $100,000, then if you really want to kill them, or even with multiple bullets, you might think twice.
Maybe the greatest use of money is physical friction, monetary friction, consequences.
Fines work, monetary penalties, like getting $500 traffic tickets for turning red on a red light and not doing. Certainly has changed my driving behavior.
So I suppose the critical intelligent thing to consider is want to make things free, and want to make things cost money, to direct human behavior.
For good behavior, make it free.
For bad behavior, make it very expensive.
ERIC
Some very very simple things to consider:
First, make things expensive, don’t make them free.
For example, let us say that you dip into the pr0n– but you don’t want to do it anymore, for whatever reason. Maybe make it a thing that if you want to watch it, you have to go to an adult DVD store, and pay $20 bucks to buy the CD or whatever. 
Or, for activities… I think often signing up and paying for an activity is a good idea because it creates sense of ownership, responsibility, or follow through. Or commitment.
For example, perhaps the intelligence of paying money for a trainer or a personal trainer is that you you know that if you don’t show up there is a fiscal penalty.
But the new ones is you don’t want to breed fake virtuosity for the sake of fake virtuosity. 
For example, there is this weird notion in American culture that pain and suffering and overcoming is virtuous. No. Fools!
Exercise workout or whatever is not virtuous, it is something that you do because it is fun enjoyable and something that you like!
For example, would you bribe your kid money to play at the playground? No! So why do this for yourself? 
What is the least harmful?
Weed is bad for your brain?
Protect others from ruin?
Destructive thoughts
The salt gray water
Looking across the endless sea
The high God of thunder
The dim saltwater
Don’t conceal your feelings?
.
Ask your mother for help!
.
The gods who live at ease
Zeus loves the thunderbolt
The noble Ethiopians
The pavement of bronze
 
Always be suspicious of everybody?
Man become more man, more masculine
Woman becomes more woman, more feminine
Man becomes blacker, woman becomes whiter?
Built to inspire?
Life is too short *NOT* to inspire others?
Compassion, empathy and pity — maybe these are virtues like Jesus taught us?
Note — how the Leica Q is the cash cow for Leica, and also the Ricoh GR, and Fujifilm X100 cameras
The second something bores you… Switch it up!
Take it back to the moment where I got my first canon power shot point and shoot digital camera, with a 1.3 megapixel sensor, and also, the ability to instantly review photos on the LCD screen, instantly?
Point and shoot cameras are the way!
I bought every V12 engine, wish I could take it back to the beginning. – JAY Z
Just start from where you started off,,, again!
A fresh, carte blanche mind
Maybe we have to add more friction and physics to the world of the Internet,
.
What is a good ghetto solution? 
A thought and observation… the ultimate point is to win or to succeed at something.
For example, the very very bizarre thing in the world of weightlifting, bodybuilding, powerlifting, strongman, etc. is this notion of cheating. For example, when I first did the atlas lift and broke the gym bro universe, and also with my impressive rack pulls, everyone was just scratching their heads, confused… and asking themselves “What just happened?â€
For example, there’s a school of what I call, “form Nazisâ€, is in which people try to get you to lift a weight or perform a certain lift the way they think is virtuous, and when you do it contrary, you’re “cheatingâ€.
First, it doesn’t matter.
Only fools with fragile egos compete.
For example, AI, ChatGPT, and now the new Google Gemini on the android pixel phones… Kind of the game changer… The ability to quickly summarize and sift through your Gmail of 100,000 unread emails? Finally the game changer?
For example the insane intelligence of a sun hat, with a wide brim in front, and the neck protection thing in the back.
Then who?
Davinci — what is *POSSIBLE*?
What’s magic?
35-40% value of USD
.
MELTING ice cube
Human capital
12% cost to capital
.
Crypto gold
God Money
.
2014– hasn’t been hacked
Property
$60B of Satoshi 1M coins in that wallet
$10B cannot hack it.
…
Entrepreneur is very positive in America
.
Economic Engineer ***
Physics, metallurgy chemistry, aeronautics
.
Water cannot go up hill
Standard Oil
.
Clean engineering experts
Branded food
Safe to eat
Expensive or cheap inputs?
.
Economic adventurer —
The winner is only 1?
Master practical economics ***!
Don’t trust no books
.
Entrepreneurship is real?
People aren’t robots and machines
Politics, sociology. Economics.
Competition
.
The laws of physics
You cannot cheat physics
.
Airplane aluminum
Steel doesn’t fly
.
Distort social norms
.
Casting a spell and protect your identity?
The spell?
.
Conservative, mass?
You can’t go from 200 pounds to 200,000 pounds
.
Wizards don’t use keyboards,,, they talk to it?
We don’t use the keyboard anymore!
Don’t skeuomorphism — re-imagine it
.
Technology fails until it succeeds
.
Arthur C Clarke
Magic !
1998 –> IPO
Science fiction
Technology and magic
…
Winston Churchill?
.
Save?
.
.
Death by 1000 cuts
.
Funny thing, it seems that a lot of people desire to be in some sort of high-powered sports car, hyper car, truck etc.… But technically if you’re just standing next to them or the vehicle, you’re in a dominant position. 
For example, I think the reason why people tell you to sit down watch and take a seat, it’s actually because they want to be in a more dominant position than you.
For example, if you are a presidential candidate, have you ever seen a presidential candidate do a debate or speech while sitting? No! They stand!
This is also where modern day education is so… Why do you get kids to sit down? It is probably the worst position for them to be in? Is actually for them to be standing… Walking around, outside outdoors, in the agora etc. 
Ideal would be actually a bunch of people standing, outside in the direct elements, or at least in the shad or whatever… And everyone is standing in a circle, and there is a little speech of peptalk, etc.
Also, today’s brave New World of voice dictation and modern technology, there is no real reason to use a keyboard anymore, or even write down things pen and pad. 
For example, we are brainwashed into thinking that Penn and Pat is virtuous, but when is the last time you had to fill out a form long hand? In fact, I have more difficulty and annoyances having to figure out how to fill out PDF form, and how to edit a PDF form, rather than Figuring out how to do long hand stuff.
Michael Saylor said something interesting, in which whenever you watch sci-fi films, you never see somebody just busted out an iPhone and type it out with your thumbs. No. They talk to Jarvis, or voice dictate it. Think about how Tony Stark interacts and engages with Jarvis his personal computer and AI, he never touches a keyboard! He stands, does the zooming and enhancing with the floating holographic screen, and what he does is talk to it! Kind of like what we could do right now with ChatGPT.
This is why Apple putting a keyboard on the iPad is the worst diss you could do to the soul of Steve Jobs. Or even worse, that’s stupid Apple stylus, even more shameless the Apple Pencil “pro� Come on guys didn’t you know that Steve Jobs intended the iPad to be used without a keyboard, and for it to be used to draw with your finger, not a stupid overpriced device which will get outdated in a season or two?
Just ride the metro — I love the metro E line (haha, for ERIC line)—













































Why? Eyes plugged to their iPhones, also ears plugged into AirPods!
What *should* streets of the future look like? Or sidewalks of the future?