Audio

Why Apple is not sustainable vlog

If you teach somebody for fun in the spirit of fun and they get sad offended or whatever, this is their problem! Maybe we gotta start treating adulthood like high school 2.0; honestly whenever I ask people what type of person they were in high school, they are revealing a lot about themselves.

100 pound plates

Stomach

Use afternoon for tanning

Grab him by the neck

Pseudo science

Clay and potter

The art of sculpture

Sport?

Razoring, cutting up ripping

Greater purity

Concentrates so well

.

Becoming more glamorous and cocky

Satisfying

It must be fun!

Life must be fun, life must be play?

Cyber clothing?

Seamless.

.

Like a Zillow app but for bitcoin

Cyber real estate

A trillion headaches? –> home ownership?

.

Are people high off crack?

Nothing is worth it?

All these effeminate people?

.

Real estate, digital real estate, cyber real estate?

.

$100B goals

..

Bombing, catching rays, razoring off 

Is it not cool to be happy anymore?

Eating tanning and training 

.

The body is a reluctant medium

You don’t really see your body as part of you anymore?

Look as fancy and outrageous like a unicorn

I don’t want the bread because it is not on my special sex diet

couple of hours at the beach

Grin and appraise wolfishy

The wolf

Carved out of ice

Last minute Sun on the rooftop

Armor plated look 

Pose.

.

Critiques about modern Day bodybuilding 

First, The secret that literally everyone is on steroids, even the natural ones. I would customize that 100% of all the people on Facebook Instagram TikTok and YouTube are on steroids, or a “natural” form of steroids.

Second, it seems that their methods are very very strange and bizarre and don’t make any sense because once again, they obfuscate the fact that they are on steroids!

For example, a lot of bodybuilders have certain strange theories on how they build muscle and whatever, but the biggest issue the biggest issue here is that their methods theories and techniques have no veracity if once again, they are on steroids!

So for example, you could probably eat super super dirty, and poorly, and yet still get spectacular gains because you’re on steroids! So I suppose the question is:

How much of your technique theories and approach is legitimate, and how much of it is steroids?

---

I don’t even trust protein powder

I have a theory that protein powder just makes you fat. Assuming that protein powder is just powder cows milk, even this 100% whey protein powder whatever, essentially it is a money making scam. I have been able to make insane gains, fasting all day, simply having 100% carnivore meal in the evening, trying to aim for about 4 to 5 pounds of beef. I’ll enjoy ground beef, 80%, or beef ribs, beef liver, beef heart, ribeye steaks and the like.

Honestly,  i’m sure protein powder is fine, but still… I think the biggest issue in bodybuilding is this constant sense of FOMO; like I remember when I was younger, I would almost had this anxiety that immediately 15 or 30 minutes after working out if I didn’t eat protein powder, if I didn’t have a 100% way protein shake, or protein powder, I would somehow “lose “ my gains.

Measurements

Another real big problem here is this obsession to measure yourself to weigh yourself etc. I’ve never really taped measured my muscles or whatever I feel this is ridiculous, but certainly a lot of guys overly obsessed about his weight. Like guys are always trying to gain weight. Not lose weight.

But the reason why this is so ridiculous is that the scale doesn’t know if the weight is fat or muscle. Only you could know by just looking in the mirror, naked, if you could see your six pack and penis arrow, you’re in good territory. And this is what a lot of guys don’t understand; everyone is trying to become super super big and massive like the Incredible Hulk or they want to look like an orc, but, this is not sexy and attractive to women. They would prefer a more Brad Pitt fight club, ERIC KIM, Adonis physique. In Elsa pose this is the thing I don’t understand; for male bodybuilders, how much of it is to impress women versus other men?

 Assuming you’re trying to stunt on other men, this is also a bit ridiculous because just because you have bigger muscles doesn’t mean that you would be more dominant in a fist fight. And it also doesn’t really measure your courage.

 If anything, what is actually much more impressive if you’re trying to stunt on other guys, is to just get into powerlifting or hypelifting or strongman style exercises; he who can lift the most weight, has the biggest dick. 

Big dick KIM

Until you could successfully lift 1000 pounds, you got nothing on me.

this myth of multiple small meals throughout a day

This is also pseudo scientific; I’ve proved that you could lift 1000 pounds, while fasting, and I’ve been doing this for about seven years; no breakfast no lunch, only old massive 100% carnivore dinner.

Also, I’m the only weightlifter and bodybuilder that I know and also power lifter and hype lifter who literally eats no starches no carbs etc. The notion that you need carbs to build muscle is another silly fallacy. I think the only reason why people don’t experiment with this simple thought, is once again, this fear of missing out on the gains. 

There is an insecurity about being around somebody physically overpowering

.

Anabolism, constructive metabolism

Metabolism means change

Obviously your metabolism as a three-year-old, 12-year-old, 21-year-old and 36-year-old will be different but one is not superior to any other one

For example at the age of 36, this is the most powerful and physically dominant I’ve been in my life, maybe my best physique thus far? The most muscle the least amount of body fat.

constructive change

Sleep 12 hours

Anabolic steroids

You cannot lie to yourself

A man has as much to offer as a woman

Physical work capacity

It is a virtue to look unreal 

Wear yourself like armor

Your body your muscles are your armor

.

Conversation piece; like walking down a cheetah down the street


black jive talk

.

Art completes what nature cannot bring to finish

The artist gives us knowledge of natures unrealized ends.

Very serious performance of art

Don’t trust anybody who needs to get a coach or does competitions?

.

Nowadays, the male body as an aesthetic is not really highly prized

Artistic competition

Visual enjoyment

.

So I suppose the value or the virtue of bodybuilding weightlifting is that the human body especially the male one could be seen in terms of visual enjoyment or like the same visual enjoyment people get from looking at a Lamborghini?

Once again… It is pretty common that there are car shows, and people could oogle and eye fuck all of these exotic cars. But somehow the body is something to be made shameful of? 

Peaks of visual culture

Polyceitus

Art isn’t human?

That’s Art

How to save time with weightlifting

Unembarrased of the body 

.

Why are most people so embarrassed of their bodies?

Human mechanic

Weakness is a crime don’t be a criminal.

Why Apple Is Not Sustainable

So thinking about the market in the future etc., especially 30 years from now ;

First, issue here is the laws of physics. Even if Apple has $1 trillion, there is only so much you could do to the laws of physics to make the iPad thinner, lighter, more compact, also even the iPhone; it looks like it has already hit peak physics; can’t really make it that much bigger, the iPhone Pro Max is as big as it will ever get, and the whole foldable notion is a poor idea.

Also, seems that Apple is on an addition rampage, adding stuff adding features, adding buttons etc. For example, I think the new quick draw camera control in the bottom of my corner is a good idea, but the whole slightly squeeze it and to go through the Settings is an insanely terrible idea. Why? I tested it out, and it is lower, More unintuitive, and inferior to use than the traditional camera layout, which is fast, smooth and slick.

To me the most bizarre thing about the new iPhone is technically the previous generation, the action button the top left, wasn’t that supposed to be the quick draw camera function? So now, the baffling question; why would you have a dedicated camera button in the bottom right corner, but also, Have an action function in the top left corner to also open up the Camera app? Makes no sense!

If anything, I think what Apple should’ve done was trying to come up with more ingenious ideas on making the camera control more intuitive. For example, I have this very very good idea for you Apple; essentially make it where when you immediately drop your camera, you could turn on an optional feature in which when you’re raised to your iPhone, it automatically takes one or two photos, and then you could decide with privacy, whether to keep it or not. To me this would be an insanely great innovation because ideally, let us say that you’re playing with your kid or you’re out on the streets or whatever. And you see something you want to photograph, technically the ideal is just raise it and take it out of your pocket and lift up the camera, I mean the iPhone, and it automatically takes one or two pictures. However in order to prevent dick pics and the like, you can make it a private function; like if you’re using your iPhone while you’re taking a piss, you won’t accidentally reveal your penis photo to others in your camera app library. 

Why innovation is dead at Apple 

I just got the new iPad Pro M4 chip, and for the most part it is a perfect device, good job Apple iPad team. But, the one really really terrible thing you guys did, are you guys brain dead? Putting the Face ID camera on the right side of the tablet? If Steve Jobs was still alive you would’ve immediately fired whoever made that brain dead decision.

First, for us real iPad users, us true pros, first, we do not use a stupid pencil, Steve Jobs would have hated it. Second, no loser keyboard; the purpose of an iPad was to get rid of the features of the physical keyboard, not to add it. I find it a shameless thing; inventing some sort of keyboard to try to make it into a mini laptop; you just have to bifurcate it — if you need a physical keyboard just buy a laptop, if you want an iPad iPad Pro, you should be using it without a case, just handholding it, holding it vertical.

The reason why the new camera design is so poor is that when you are actually holding an iPad vertically, natural realistically you’re right thumb will block the Face ID true ID. And as a consequence, it really really disrupts your workflow!

---

The vibes?

A nice quote that I got from Michael Saylor, via Nicola Tesla, —

If you really want to understand the universe, think in terms of vibration, frequency, and energy. 

Impractical terms, the way that I interpret this is you could feel human emotions as vibrations, or the feeling in the air. The “boon-hwee-gge” in Korean — the feeling of the environment in the air of a place.

Maybe in the past, there was a sense of jubilant, going to an Apple Store. Now it is dread some; everyone looks super unhappy, even the apple employees used to be super happy Chip and chewy; all look dark morose, tired. No more passion.

Where is the new passion?

Anyone who is a bitcoin, Michael Saylor fan, and now micro strategy, this is the real economic opportunism, the real economic optimism! 

For me, I have embedded in my mind, this 55% API notion in my brain; if I do the maths, assuming that my $1.1 million worth of bitcoin hasn’t a PI of 55%, you’re over a year, that means within 15 years I should be a billionaire! Worth 1.2 billion.

And to me this is insanely optimistic because then, if you can know the future with some level of precision, then you could actually start to plan your life! What that means is learning how to live today, expecting a very glorious future!

---

Men and women should be kept apart?

So thinking about the market in the future etc., especially 30 years from now ;

First, issue here is the laws of physical. Even if Apple has $1 trillion, there is only so much you could do to the laws of physics to make the iPad thinner, lighter, more compact, also even the iPhone; it looks like it has already hit peak physics; can’t really make it that much bigger, the iPhone Pro Max is as big as it will ever get, and the whole foldable notion is a poor idea.

Also, seems that Apple is on an addition rampage, adding stuff adding features, adding buttons etc. For example, I think the new quick draw camera control in the bottom of my corner is a good idea, but the whole slightly squeeze it and to go through the Settings is an insanely terrible idea. Why? I tested it out, and it is lower, More unintuitive, and inferior to use than the traditional camera layout, which is fast, smooth and slick.

To me the most bizarre thing about the new iPhone is technically the previous generation, the action button the top left, wasn’t that supposed to be the quick draw camera function? So now, the baffling question; why would you have a dedicated camera button in the bottom right corner, but also, Have an action function in the top left corner to also open up the Camera app? Makes no sense!

If anything, I think what Apple should’ve done was trying to come up with more ingenious ideas on making the camera control more intuitive. For example, I have this very very good idea for you Apple; essentially make it where when you immediately drop your camera, you could turn on an optional feature in which when you’re raised to your iPhone, it automatically takes one or two photos, and then you could decide with privacy, whether to keep it or not. To me this would be an insanely great innovation because ideally, let us say that you’re playing with your kid or you’re out on the streets or whatever. And you see something you want to photograph, technically the ideal is just raise it and take it out of your pocket and lift up the camera, I mean the iPhone, and it automatically takes one or two pictures. However in order to prevent dick pics and the like, you can make it a private function; like if you’re using your iPhone while you’re taking a piss, you won’t accidentally reveal your penis photo to others in your camera app library. 

Why innovation is dead at Apple 

I just got the new iPad Pro M4 chip, and for the most part it is a perfect device, good job Apple iPad team. But, the one really really terrible thing you guys did, are you guys brain dead? Putting the Face ID camera on the right side of the tablet? If Steve Jobs was still alive you would’ve immediately fired whoever made that brain dead decision.

First, for us real iPad users, us true pros, first, we do not use a stupid pencil, Steve Jobs would have hated it. Second, no loser keyboard; the purpose of an iPad was to get rid of the features of the physical keyboard, not to add it. I find it a shameless thing; inventing some sort of keyboard to try to make it into a mini laptop; you just have to bifurcate it — if you need a physical keyboard just buy a laptop, if you want an iPad iPad Pro, you should be using it without a case, just handholding it, holding it vertical.

The reason why the new camera design is so poor is that when you are actually holding an iPad vertically, natural realistically you’re right thumb will block the Face ID true ID. And as a consequence, it really really disrupts your workflow!

---

The vibes?

A nice quote that I got from Michael Saylor, via Nicola Tesla, —

If you really want to understand the universe, think in terms of vibration, frequency, and energy. 

Impractical terms, the way that I interpret this is you could feel human emotions as vibrations, or the feeling in the air. The “boon-hwee-gge” in Korean — the feeling of the environment in the air of a place.

Maybe in the past, there was a sense of jubilant, going to an Apple Store. Now it is dread some; everyone looks super unhappy, even the apple employees used to be super happy Chip and chewy; all look dark morose, tired. No more passion.

Where is the new passion?

Anyone who is a bitcoin, Michael Saylor fan, and now micro strategy, this is the real economic opportunism, the real economic optimism! 

For me, I have embedded in my mind, this 55% API notion in my brain; if I do the maths, assuming that my $1.1 million worth of bitcoin hasn’t a PI of 55%, you’re over a year, that means within 15 years I should be a billionaire! Worth 1.2 billion.

And to me this is insanely optimistic because then, if you can know the future with some level of precision, then you could actually start to plan your life! What that means is learning how to live today, expecting a very glorious future!

---

Audio

Why Apple is not sustainable

So thinking about the market in the future etc., especially 30 years from now ;

First, issue here is the laws of physical. Even if Apple has $1 trillion, there is only so much you could do to the laws of physics to make the iPad thinner, lighter, more compact, also even the iPhone; it looks like it has already hit peak physics; can’t really make it that much bigger, the iPhone Pro Max is as big as it will ever get, and the whole foldable notion is a poor idea.

Also, seems that Apple is on an addition rampage, adding stuff adding features, adding buttons etc. For example, I think the new quick draw camera control in the bottom of my corner is a good idea, but the whole slightly squeeze it and to go through the Settings is an insanely terrible idea. Why? I tested it out, and it is lower, More unintuitive, and inferior to use than the traditional camera layout, which is fast, smooth and slick.

To me the most bizarre thing about the new iPhone is technically the previous generation, the action button the top left, wasn’t that supposed to be the quick draw camera function? So now, the baffling question; why would you have a dedicated camera button in the bottom right corner, but also, Have an action function in the top left corner to also open up the Camera app? Makes no sense!

If anything, I think what Apple should’ve done was trying to come up with more ingenious ideas on making the camera control more intuitive. For example, I have this very very good idea for you Apple; essentially make it where when you immediately drop your camera, you could turn on an optional feature in which when you’re raised to your iPhone, it automatically takes one or two photos, and then you could decide with privacy, whether to keep it or not. To me this would be an insanely great innovation because ideally, let us say that you’re playing with your kid or you’re out on the streets or whatever. And you see something you want to photograph, technically the ideal is just raise it and take it out of your pocket and lift up the camera, I mean the iPhone, and it automatically takes one or two pictures. However in order to prevent dick pics and the like, you can make it a private function; like if you’re using your iPhone while you’re taking a piss, you won’t accidentally reveal your penis photo to others in your camera app library. 

Why innovation is dead at Apple 

I just got the new iPad Pro M4 chip, and for the most part it is a perfect device, good job Apple iPad team. But, the one really really terrible thing you guys did, are you guys brain dead? Putting the Face ID camera on the right side of the tablet? If Steve Jobs was still alive you would’ve immediately fired whoever made that brain dead decision.

First, for us real iPad users, us true pros, first, we do not use a stupid pencil, Steve Jobs would have hated it. Second, no loser keyboard; the purpose of an iPad was to get rid of the features of the physical keyboard, not to add it. I find it a shameless thing; inventing some sort of keyboard to try to make it into a mini laptop; you just have to bifurcate it — if you need a physical keyboard just buy a laptop, if you want an iPad iPad Pro, you should be using it without a case, just handholding it, holding it vertical.

The reason why the new camera design is so poor is that when you are actually holding an iPad vertically, natural realistically you’re right thumb will block the Face ID true ID. And as a consequence, it really really disrupts your workflow!

---

The vibes?

A nice quote that I got from Michael Saylor, via Nicola Tesla, —

If you really want to understand the universe, think in terms of vibration, frequency, and energy. 

Impractical terms, the way that I interpret this is you could feel human emotions as vibrations, or the feeling in the air. The “boon-hwee-gge” in Korean — the feeling of the environment in the air of a place.

Maybe in the past, there was a sense of jubilant, going to an Apple Store. Now it is dread some; everyone looks super unhappy, even the apple employees used to be super happy Chip and chewy; all look dark morose, tired. No more passion.

Where is the new passion?

Anyone who is a bitcoin, Michael Saylor fan, and now micro strategy, this is the real economic opportunism, the real economic optimism! 

For me, I have embedded in my mind, this 55% API notion in my brain; if I do the maths, assuming that my $1.1 million worth of bitcoin hasn’t a PI of 55%, you’re over a year, that means within 15 years I should be a billionaire! Worth 1.2 billion.

And to me this is insanely optimistic because then, if you can know the future with some level of precision, then you could actually start to plan your life! What that means is learning how to live today, expecting a very glorious future!

---

Here is the spelled-out version of the table:

• Year 0: $1,100,000

• Year 1: $1,705,000

• Year 2: $2,642,750

• Year 3: $4,096,262

• Year 4: $6,349,206

• Year 5: $9,841,270

• Year 6: $15,253,968

• Year 7: $23,644,651

• Year 8: $36,649,209

• Year 9: $56,806,274

• Year 10: $88,049,725

• Year 11: $136,477,073

• Year 12: $211,539,462

• Year 13: $328,886,166

• Year 14: $509,773,557

• Year 15: $790,149,013

• Year 16: $1,224,730,970

• Year 17: $1,898,332,003

• Year 18: $2,942,414,605

• Year 19: $4,560,741,637

• Year 20: $7,069,148,537

• Year 21: $10,957,179,232

• Year 22: $17,013,607,810

• Year 23: $26,371,091,106

• Year 24: $40,875,190,214

• Year 25: $63,356,544,832

• Year 26: $98,202,644,490

• Year 27: $152,194,098,959

• Year 28: $235,900,854,387

• Year 29: $365,646,324,300

• Year 30: $564,083,803,799

This shows the investment growth for each year, spelled out without decimal points.

16 years to hit a billion dollars? 1.2B in 16 years, Seneca will only be 18 years old, ready to go off to college?

Here is the spelled-out version of the table:

• Year 0: $1,100,000

• Year 1: $1,705,000

• Year 2: $2,642,750

• Year 3: $4,096,262

• Year 4: $6,349,206

• Year 5: $9,841,270

• Year 6: $15,253,968

• Year 7: $23,644,651

• Year 8: $36,649,209

• Year 9: $56,806,274

• Year 10: $88,049,725

• Year 11: $136,477,073

• Year 12: $211,539,462

• Year 13: $328,886,166

• Year 14: $509,773,557

• Year 15: $790,149,013

• Year 16: $1,224,730,970

• Year 17: $1,898,332,003

• Year 18: $2,942,414,605

• Year 19: $4,560,741,637

• Year 20: $7,069,148,537

• Year 21: $10,957,179,232

• Year 22: $17,013,607,810

• Year 23: $26,371,091,106

• Year 24: $40,875,190,214

• Year 25: $63,356,544,832

• Year 26: $98,202,644,490

• Year 27: $152,194,098,959

• Year 28: $235,900,854,387

• Year 29: $365,646,324,300

• Year 30: $564,083,803,799

This shows the investment growth for each year, spelled out without decimal points.

After 30 years, with a 55% annual percentage yield (APY) on an initial investment of $1.1 million, the final amount would be approximately $564.08 billion.

the virtues of bitcoin, in my mind, owning a bitcoin is like owning a single-family home, and I suppose I have a lot of single-family homes now. I’m like a new digital slumlord.

on top of this, a thought; maybe in the near future, a single bitcoin should be able to sustain a single child or adult for his or her entire lifetime. So the number of coins your own, think of it like the number of children you have.

I think the best way to think about Bitcoin, kind of like how Michael Saylor talks about it, is cyber real estate. Essentially they gotta imagine in server space, in the near future, there will only ever be 21 million homes left in cyber Manhattan. Or cyber LA. Or cyber Culver City. Consequence, to buy a bitcoin is like buying a single-family home, without all the downsides of owning a physical home or properties; the laws of physics gravity etc.

I suppose my great assessment and judgment and critique of modern day society is that has been essentially hijacked by feminine ideals and virtues. Even Nietzsche commented that Christianity was essentially a feminine woman’s religion. And he commented that at least Mohammadism was a masculine one.

Women desire security, steadiness, predictability, safety. Man desires risk, harm, war, battle & conquest.

Man desires to conquer!

Either in Bitcoin or in the stock market, the traditional markets your IRA, etc?

My notion of true wealth — the absence of cares and concerns! Not how much should you own, or how much money you have!

wow, Mike Zuckerberg, worth $141 billion, and then after that it is Dustin Moskovitz, who is worth only 13 billion,— almost a 10x jump!

xxx

Here is a list of some of the richest Millennials (people born between 1981 and 1996) as of 2024:

1. Mark Zuckerberg

• Net Worth: $141.5 billion

• Born: May 14, 1984

• Source of Wealth: Meta (Facebook)

2. Colin Huang (Huang Zheng)

• Net Worth: $38.9 billion

• Born: January 1, 1980 (technically Gen X, but often included in Millennial discussions due to his entrepreneurial focus on Millennial markets)

• Source of Wealth: Pinduoduo (e-commerce)

3. Dustin Moskovitz

• Net Worth: $13.6 billion

• Born: May 22, 1984

• Source of Wealth: Facebook, Asana

4. Nathan Blecharczyk

• Net Worth: $11.5 billion

• Born: April 1983

• Source of Wealth: Airbnb

5. Brian Chesky

• Net Worth: $11.4 billion

• Born: August 29, 1981

• Source of Wealth: Airbnb

6. Joe Gebbia

• Net Worth: $11.4 billion

• Born: August 21, 1981

• Source of Wealth: Airbnb

7. Bobby Murphy

• Net Worth: $9.7 billion

• Born: April 1, 1988

• Source of Wealth: Snap Inc. (Snapchat)

8. Evan Spiegel

• Net Worth: $9.6 billion

• Born: June 4, 1990

• Source of Wealth: Snap Inc. (Snapchat)

9. Lukas Walton

• Net Worth: $21.2 billion

• Born: 1986

• Source of Wealth: Walmart (heir to Walton family fortune)

10. Whitney Wolfe Herd

• Net Worth: $1.5 billion

• Born: July 1, 1989

• Source of Wealth: Bumble (dating app)

These Millennials have made their fortunes primarily through tech ventures, social media platforms, e-commerce, and innovative business models.

so it looks like, the only really really young successful person is Mark Zuckerberg, only 40 years old, born in 1984. The only successful millennial.

Everyone else is super old. On the way out.

I suppose the upside for us then is essentially, once they all die off, time for us to inherit the earth! And also for our kids to inherit the earth!

Elon — 53. I still got another 20 years!

Looking at all their ages ,,, Elon is, 53 years old, born in 1971… I’m born in 1988,,,

The only one on this list who is worth mentioning is Mark Zuckerberg, worth $141 billion, age 40, 1984. The only millennial on the list.

Putting up a lot of people always talk about Bernard Arnault,,, who is 75 years old, nobody wants to be him. In a while, Larry Ellison is really old, 79 years old, practically 80! Even Warren Buffett, 94 years old— still shocked he is still alive?

…

Phil Knight wow, 86 years old?

Also, Amancio Ortega, 88 years old! WOW.

…

Here are the birthdays of the top 25 richest people in the world in 2024:

1. Elon Musk – Born: June 28, 1971

Net Worth: $210.2B (Tesla, SpaceX)

2. Bernard Arnault – Born: March 5, 1949

Net Worth: $209.1B (LVMH)

3. Jeff Bezos – Born: January 12, 1964

Net Worth: $183.4B (Amazon)

4. Larry Ellison – Born: August 17, 1944

Net Worth: $141.6B (Oracle)

5. Mark Zuckerberg – Born: May 14, 1984

Net Worth: $141.5B (Meta/Facebook)

6. Larry Page – Born: March 26, 1973

Net Worth: $145.1B (Google)

7. Sergey Brin – Born: August 21, 1973

Net Worth: $139B (Google)

8. Warren Buffett – Born: August 30, 1930

Net Worth: $134B (Berkshire Hathaway)

9. Bill Gates – Born: October 28, 1955

Net Worth: $131B (Microsoft)

10. Steve Ballmer – Born: March 24, 1956

Net Worth: $126.5B (Microsoft)

11. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers – Born: July 10, 1953

Net Worth: $96.6B (L’Oréal)

12. Mukesh Ambani – Born: April 19, 1957

Net Worth: $102.1B (Reliance Industries)

13. Carlos Slim Helu – Born: January 28, 1940

Net Worth: $100.8B (Telecom)

14. Amancio Ortega – Born: March 28, 1936

Net Worth: $86B (Inditex, Zara)

15. Zhong Shanshan – Born: December 1, 1954

Net Worth: $60.5B (Nongfu Spring, Beverages)

16. Jim Walton – Born: June 7, 1948

Net Worth: $67.6B (Walmart)

17. Alice Walton – Born: October 7, 1949

Net Worth: $63.3B (Walmart)

18. Rob Walton – Born: October 28, 1944

Net Worth: $62.1B (Walmart)

19. Michael Bloomberg – Born: February 14, 1942

Net Worth: $94.5B (Bloomberg LP)

20. Phil Knight – Born: February 24, 1938

Net Worth: $40.9B (Nike)

21. Giovanni Ferrero – Born: September 2, 1964

Net Worth: $43.8B (Ferrero Group)

22. Tadashi Yanai – Born: February 7, 1949

Net Worth: $42.8B (Fast Retailing, Uniqlo)

23. Stephen Schwarzman – Born: February 14, 1947

Net Worth: $38.8B (Blackstone)

24. Colin Huang – Born: January 1, 1980

Net Worth: $38.9B (PDD Holdings)

25. Jacqueline Mars – Born: October 10, 1939

Net Worth: $38.5B (Mars Inc.)

These dates provide a fuller picture of the diverse age range of the world’s wealthiest people in 2024.

***

Here are the birthdays of the top 10 richest people in the world in 2024:

1. Elon Musk – Born: June 28, 1971

Net Worth: $210.2B (Tesla, SpaceX)

2. Bernard Arnault – Born: March 5, 1949

Net Worth: $209.1B (LVMH)

3. Jeff Bezos – Born: January 12, 1964

Net Worth: $183.4B (Amazon)

4. Larry Ellison – Born: August 17, 1944

Net Worth: $141.6B (Oracle)

5. Mark Zuckerberg – Born: May 14, 1984

Net Worth: $141.5B (Meta/Facebook)

6. Larry Page – Born: March 26, 1973

Net Worth: $145.1B (Google)

7. Sergey Brin – Born: August 21, 1973

Net Worth: $139B (Google)

8. Warren Buffett – Born: August 30, 1930

Net Worth: $134B (Berkshire Hathaway)

9. Bill Gates – Born: October 28, 1955

Net Worth: $131B (Microsoft)

10. Steve Ballmer – Born: March 24, 1956

Net Worth: $126.5B (Microsoft)

These birthdates provide insight into the ages and generational backgrounds of some of the world’s wealthiest individuals.

***

Here are the top 25 richest people in the world as of 2024, along with their ages and sources of wealth:

1. Elon Musk – Age: 53, Net Worth: $210.2B (Tesla, SpaceX, X)

2. Bernard Arnault & family – Age: 75, Net Worth: $209.1B (LVMH)

3. Jeff Bezos – Age: 60, Net Worth: $183.4B (Amazon)

4. Larry Ellison – Age: 79, Net Worth: $141.6B (Oracle)

5. Mark Zuckerberg – Age: 40, Net Worth: $141.5B (Meta/Facebook)

6. Larry Page – Age: 51, Net Worth: $145.1B (Google)

7. Sergey Brin – Age: 51, Net Worth: $139B (Google)

8. Warren Buffett – Age: 94, Net Worth: $134B (Berkshire Hathaway)

9. Bill Gates – Age: 68, Net Worth: $131B (Microsoft)

10. Steve Ballmer – Age: 68, Net Worth: $126.5B (Microsoft)

11. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers – Age: 70, Net Worth: $96.6B (L’Oréal)

12. Mukesh Ambani – Age: 67, Net Worth: $102.1B (Reliance Industries)

13. Carlos Slim Helu & family – Age: 84, Net Worth: $100.8B (Telecom)

14. Amancio Ortega – Age: 88, Net Worth: $86B (Inditex, Zara)

15. Zhong Shanshan – Age: 69, Net Worth: $60.5B (Nongfu Spring, Beverages)

16. Jim Walton – Age: 75, Net Worth: $67.6B (Walmart)

17. Alice Walton – Age: 74, Net Worth: $63.3B (Walmart)

18. Rob Walton – Age: 79, Net Worth: $62.1B (Walmart)

19. Michael Bloomberg – Age: 82, Net Worth: $94.5B (Bloomberg LP)

20. Phil Knight & family – Age: 86, Net Worth: $40.9B (Nike)

21. Giovanni Ferrero – Age: 59, Net Worth: $43.8B (Ferrero Group)

22. Tadashi Yanai – Age: 75, Net Worth: $42.8B (Fast Retailing, Uniqlo)

23. Stephen Schwarzman – Age: 77, Net Worth: $38.8B (Blackstone)

24. Colin Huang – Age: 44, Net Worth: $38.9B (PDD Holdings)

25. Jacqueline Mars – Age: 84, Net Worth: $38.5B (Mars Inc.)

These rankings fluctuate with market conditions, stock performance, and other factors. Sources include key industries such as technology, retail, and luxury goods    .

xxx

Here is a list of the richest people in the world along with their ages, as of 2024:

1. Elon Musk – Age: 53

Net Worth: $205.4 billion

Source: Tesla, SpaceX  

2. Jeff Bezos – Age: 60

Net Worth: $203.2 billion

Source: Amazon  

3. Bernard Arnault – Age: 75

Net Worth: $200 billion

Source: LVMH (Luxury Goods)  

4. Mark Zuckerberg – Age: 40

Net Worth: $176.5 billion

Source: Meta (Facebook)  

5. Larry Ellison – Age: 79

Net Worth: $153.7 billion

Source: Oracle  

6. Larry Page – Age: 51

Net Worth: $145.1 billion

Source: Google  

7. Sergey Brin – Age: 51

Net Worth: $139 billion

Source: Google  

8. Warren Buffett – Age: 94

Net Worth: $134 billion

Source: Berkshire Hathaway  

9. Bill Gates – Age: 68

Net Worth: $131 billion

Source: Microsoft  

10. Steve Ballmer – Age: 68

Net Worth: $126.5 billion

Source: Microsoft  

These rankings are based on wealth fluctuating with stock prices and business conditions, so they are subject to change throughout the year.

The interesting modern day ethos is a bit contradictory; on one hand it, praises ambition, on the other hand, it is almost seen as bad to be too ambitious—

In fact, my critique about the new Gen Z, “zillenial” category —> none of them have any ambition? In fact, the only successful people who are live right now, they were all either the baby boomer generation, or a bit younger, a lot than their 50s 70s 60s.

—> immorality?

xxx

Here are some of Eric Kim’s key quotes on ambition, reflecting his thoughts on striving for greatness and personal growth:

1. “Always strive and prosper.” – Kim encourages relentless hustle and work, drawing inspiration from hip-hop culture where hard work leads to success. He believes that ambition allows people to take control of their fate and continually push their limits .

2. “With ambition, you want to keep flying higher. You disdain the ground. You love to soar and fly!” – This quote encapsulates Kim’s view of ambition as a desire to test and expand one’s potential, constantly seeking greater heights .

3. “How much more am I capable of?” – Kim emphasizes that ambition is about curiosity and pushing beyond perceived limits to explore untapped potential  .

4. “Ambition is one of the greatest virtues of man!” – He strongly believes that ambition is a powerful driver of personal and creative growth, even when others might see it as excessive  .

These quotes illustrate Eric Kim’s belief that ambition is essential for both personal development and creative success. He encourages pushing boundaries and embracing challenges to unlock one’s full potential.

…

Eric Kim’s approach to becoming more ambitious revolves around self-improvement, breaking away from limitations, and embracing boldness. He believes that ambition is a powerful virtue, not something to be seen as negative or selfish. According to Kim, ambition is about striving toward greatness, evolving yourself, and challenging your limits both physically and mentally.

Here are some of his key ideas on how to become more ambitious:

1. Develop Supreme Confidence: Kim emphasizes that to foster ambition, you need to build unshakable confidence in yourself. He suggests “reformatting” your brain by removing negative influences, avoiding people who drag you down, and embracing empowering philosophies like Stoicism and Nietzschean thought.

2. Enhance Physical Strength: For Kim, physical fitness plays a crucial role in ambition. He advocates for building muscle, reducing body fat, and focusing on a healthy lifestyle, including intermittent fasting and ketogenic diets. He also suggests activities like walking and using standing desks to clear the mind and boost energy.

3. Reject Humility: Kim argues against false modesty. He encourages people to recognize their talents and potential, believing that realizing your own value is essential for achieving great things. He famously states, “Don’t be humble. Know you’re dope” as a way to push yourself beyond mediocrity.

4. Take Creative Risks: Kim’s philosophy of ambition is deeply tied to creativity and innovation. He encourages others to experiment, create new things, and not fear failure. Whether it’s exploring new genres in photography, trying new business ventures, or engaging in different creative outlets, he believes risk-taking is essential for growth.

5. Unlearn Moral Guilt: He suggests that traditional notions of morality, especially those around selfishness, often limit ambition. Kim encourages people to unlearn the idea that focusing on their own growth and success is wrong, and instead embrace selfishness as a pathway to achieving personal and creative ambitions.

6. Have Fun and Be Fearless: One of the most important aspects of ambition for Kim is to maintain a playful and fearless attitude. He advises that we should approach life like children—without regard for social norms—and experiment with new things just for the fun of it.

By following these principles, Kim believes that anyone can become more ambitious, unlocking their potential and striving toward greater success and fulfillment in life. His approach combines personal empowerment, creativity, and a relentless drive to push boundaries.

Sources:  ,  ,  .

x

Eric Kim’s ambition stems from a combination of philosophical beliefs, lifestyle choices, and a deep desire for personal growth and impact. He sees ambition not just as a pursuit of personal success but as a way to push humanity forward. For Kim, ambition is about evolving, growing stronger, and having unique experiences to achieve one’s fullest potential. He rejects traditional measures of success, like money, and instead focuses on creativity, innovation, and self-improvement.

Kim believes that living a comfortable, predictable life is boring and unfulfilling. Instead, he advocates for embracing challenges, chaos, and discomfort, which he sees as vital for personal development and achieving great things. His ambition is fueled by a sense of dissatisfaction, which he views as a positive force driving him to constantly create, explore, and improve himself and his work.

Moreover, he aligns his ambition with a desire to help others. He believes in freely sharing his knowledge and creative works, seeing this as a way to inspire and benefit others. This is part of his larger philosophy that personal greatness should not just elevate the individual but also contribute to the collective progress of humanity  .

His minimalist lifestyle, emphasis on health, and relentless drive to produce content—whether it’s writing, photography, or personal development—are all reflections of his ambitious nature. By removing distractions and focusing on what he is truly passionate about, Kim has built a highly productive and fulfilling life that encourages continuous growth .

Amongst the mortals — zero chance for any women to be battling in war. Only the goddesses,,, Pallas Athene, Hera, Aphrodite and the like.

The physical size difference between a full-frame camera sensor and the sensor in an iPhone Pro is substantial.

Full-Frame Sensor:

A full-frame sensor is typically 36mm x 24mm in size. This format is the same as a 35mm film frame and is used in professional-grade DSLRs and mirrorless cameras. Its large size allows for better light collection, leading to superior low-light performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control.

iPhone Pro Sensor:

The iPhone 15 Pro, for example, has a much smaller sensor. The main wide-angle camera sensor size is estimated to be about 1/1.28 inches, which is approximately 9.6mm x 7.2mm. This is common in smartphones where compactness is essential. The iPhone uses multiple small sensors for its various lenses (main, telephoto, ultra-wide), and computational photography plays a big role in image quality.

Size Comparison:

• Full-frame sensor: 36mm x 24mm

• iPhone Pro sensor: ~9.6mm x 7.2mm (for the main camera)

So, the full-frame sensor is about 3 to 4 times wider and taller, making it vastly larger in surface area, resulting in significantly more light-capturing capability per pixel. This difference explains why full-frame cameras excel in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, even though iPhone cameras are highly optimized for everyday use.

Full frame sensor — vs iPhone Pro — a trillion times bigger?

No risk, no life?

Black rock PDF

Black rock Bitcoin —>

Just wait 60 days

1. New iPad Pro M4 chip
2. New camera, LUMIX S9 & 26mm f8 manual focusing
3. Insane optimism about the future
4. Elon — $270B????

I’ve made waaaaaay more money from Bitcoin than even 10+ years of traveling the globe and teaching photography workshops?

Indirect monetizarion?

While it’s theoretically possible for some of the world’s wealthiest individuals to become trillionaires, it would require a combination of favorable economic factors, technological innovations, and continuous growth in their companies and assets.

Currently, the richest individuals, such as Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, and Jeff Bezos, have net worths in the $200-$270 billion range  . Reaching a trillion-dollar net worth would necessitate these fortunes quadrupling, which could happen through several means:

1. Technological Breakthroughs: For tech moguls like Musk and Zuckerberg, future innovations in fields such as artificial intelligence, space exploration, or green energy could drive massive growth in their companies and valuations. Musk’s ambitions in space exploration (SpaceX) and energy (Tesla) could potentially be trillion-dollar industries if they continue to scale at current rates.

2. Market Conditions: A substantial increase in stock prices, driven by either inflation or an extended bull market, could push these billionaires closer to the trillion-dollar mark. For example, Musk’s net worth fluctuates with Tesla’s stock price, and significant growth in the electric vehicle market could lead to massive increases in valuation.

3. Global Influence and Diversification: Billionaires like Bernard Arnault and Jeff Bezos, who have global influence in retail and luxury goods, could potentially grow their wealth by expanding into emerging markets, acquiring more companies, or diversifying their portfolios to capitalize on high-growth sectors.

However, achieving a trillion-dollar net worth is still considered highly speculative. It would likely require sustained exponential growth in specific industries and favorable global economic conditions  . There are also constraints like potential regulatory changes, taxes, and market competition that could limit their ability to grow wealth at the necessary pace.

xxx

As of 2024, the top richest individuals in the world include major figures from diverse industries:

1. Elon Musk – $270.5 billion (Tesla, SpaceX, United States)

2. Larry Ellison – $208.0 billion (Oracle, United States)

3. Jeff Bezos – $204.3 billion (Amazon, United States)

4. Mark Zuckerberg – $198.0 billion (Facebook, United States)

5. Bernard Arnault & family – $195.5 billion (LVMH, France)

6. Warren Buffett – $144.9 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, United States)

7. Larry Page – $137.9 billion (Google, United States)

8. Amancio Ortega – $133.0 billion (Zara, Spain)

9. Sergey Brin – $132.0 billion (Google, United States)

10. Steve Ballmer – $125.5 billion (Microsoft, United States)

These figures dominate the global wealth rankings, with fortunes built in sectors like technology, luxury goods, and retail. Their net worth is heavily influenced by stock market trends, particularly in the tech industry.

Other notable names include Mukesh Ambani ($115.0 billion, India), Francoise Bettencourt Meyers ($91.8 billion, France), and Carlos Slim Helu ($87.0 billion, Mexico). These individuals represent a diverse range of industries from petrochemicals to telecommunications   .

x

Here is a list of the top 30 richest people in the world as of 2024:

1. Elon Musk – $270.5 billion (Tesla, SpaceX, United States)

2. Larry Ellison – $208.0 billion (Oracle, United States)

3. Jeff Bezos – $204.3 billion (Amazon, United States)

4. Mark Zuckerberg – $198.0 billion (Facebook, United States)

5. Bernard Arnault & family – $195.5 billion (LVMH, France)

6. Warren Buffett – $144.9 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, United States)

7. Larry Page – $137.9 billion (Google, United States)

8. Amancio Ortega – $133.0 billion (Zara, Spain)

9. Sergey Brin – $132.0 billion (Google, United States)

10. Steve Ballmer – $125.5 billion (Microsoft, United States)

11. Mukesh Ambani – $115.0 billion (Reliance Industries, India)

12. Bill Gates – $107.9 billion (Microsoft, United States)

13. Jensen Huang – $106.2 billion (Nvidia, United States)

14. Michael Bloomberg – $104.7 billion (Bloomberg LP, United States)

15. Michael Dell – $104.3 billion (Dell Technologies, United States)

16. Rob Walton & family – $99.9 billion (Walmart, United States)

17. Jim Walton & family – $98.7 billion (Walmart, United States)

18. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers & family – $91.8 billion (L’Oréal, France)

19. Alice Walton – $91.2 billion (Walmart, United States)

20. Carlos Slim Helu & family – $87.0 billion (Telecom, Mexico)

21. Gautam Adani – $83.6 billion (Adani Group, India)

22. Julia Koch & family – $74.2 billion (Koch Industries, United States)

23. David Thomson & family – $72.1 billion (Thomson Reuters, Canada)

24. Charles Koch & family – $67.5 billion (Koch Industries, United States)

25. Changpeng Zhao – $61.1 billion (Binance, Canada)

26. Zhong Shanshan – $56.2 billion (Nongfu Spring, China)

27. Prajogo Pangestu – $54.0 billion (Barito Pacific, Indonesia)

28. Jeff Yass – $49.6 billion (Susquehanna International Group, United States)

29. Tadashi Yanai & family – $48.2 billion (Fast Retailing, Japan)

30. Ma Huateng – $47.9 billion (Tencent, China)

These figures represent their estimated net worth, which may fluctuate due to stock market changes, business ventures, and other factors   .

As of 2024, Peter Thiel’s net worth is estimated to be around $11.6 billion. Thiel made his fortune through ventures like co-founding PayPal, investing early in Facebook, and founding Palantir Technologies. He remains a significant figure in Silicon Valley and the investment world, known for his involvement in various tech startups and venture capital initiatives  .

On the other hand, Michael Saylor, primarily known for his leadership at MicroStrategy and his strong advocacy for Bitcoin, has seen his wealth fluctuate significantly due to his heavy investments in Bitcoin. As of 2024, his net worth is estimated at around $4 billion, driven by the rise in Bitcoin prices and MicroStrategy’s performance  . Saylor’s wealth is highly dependent on Bitcoin’s volatility, which makes his net worth more variable compared to Thiel’s more diversified assets .

In summary, Peter Thiel is currently wealthier than Michael Saylor, with Thiel’s estimated net worth almost three times higher than Saylor’s.

Create for 30 years from now!

How to Become a Photography Entrepreneur

1. How I Became a Street Photography Millionaire
2. OWN YOUR OWN CONTENT
3. How to Become a Professional Street Photographer
4. Professional Street Photographer
5. Create a New Industry
6. SELF HOSTED OR NOTHING.
7. TVE: TRANSACTIONAL VALUE UNLOCKED
8. THE BEST YOUTUBE SETTINGS

BECOME A PHOTOGRAPHY ENTREPRENEUR

Advice I would have given myself in photography, if I started all over again:

Until You Own Yourself You Can’t Be Free

De-lamify the future.

Photography Entrepreneurship 101 Presentation by ERIC KIM

---

ENTREPRENEURSHIP by KIM

Enroll in my Udemy Course:

‘Ultimate Beginner’s Guide to Photography Entrepreneurship’: Create Your Own Future >

---

Entrepreneurship Ideas

1. InstaSlaves
2. How to Become a Vlogger
3. How to Build Your Own Self Brand
4. SOLO MEDIA EMPIRE
5. TIME LEVERAGE.
6. How to Market Yourself in Photography
7. How to Become More Ambitious
8. Crypto Photography
9. In Praise of Email Newsletters
10. Propagate.
11. Make Your Own Street Photography Blog
12. Create the Information You Seek.
13. Content over Technology
14. How to Advertise Yourself as a Photographer
15. CREATIVE WAYS TO USE YOUTUBE
16. Photography Branding 101
17. BUILD YOURSELF.
18. Bet on Your Own Coin.
19. The Photographer Should Also Make His/Her Own Music?
20. Mix Your Photos and Videos
21. JUST PUBLISH IT.
22. EMPOWER OTHER PHOTOGRAPHERS.
23. BECOME OUTSIDE THE BOX
24. MOVE PEOPLE, MOVE PRODUCTS.
25. SOCIAL MEDIA IS FRAGILE.
26. Why Start a Photography Blog?
27. Once You FIRE (Financial Independence Retire Early), Then What?
28. THE FUTURE IS PDF
29. In Praise of Solo Photography Business Entrepreneurship
30. LONGEVITY, DURABILITY AND SUCCESS
31. Street Photography Philosophy Entrepreneurship
32. YOU ARE THE PLATFORM
33. JUST RISK IT.
34. DON’T OPTIMIZE FOR THE ALGORITHM
35. Scaleable Photography
36. What Does it Mean to Become a Successful Photographer?
37. 20 Photography Marketing, Branding, and Entrepreneurship Tips
38. Create Your Own Social Media
39. Individual Entrepreneurship
40. YOU ARE THE ICON.
41. BUILD!
42. What is Success in Photography?
43. EXTREME VISION
44. Publish Fearlessly
45. MAKE DOPE THINGS AND SHARE THEM WITH THE WORLD!
46. THE AMBITIOUS PHOTOGRAPHER.
47. PhotoLink
48. Real World Applications
49. You Are Your Own Ideal User
50. What is Your Creative Vision?
51. A More Dope, Prosperous Future for All Photographers
52. CREATION & DISTRIBUTION.
53. THE VALUE OF PHOTOS.
54. How to Maximize Your Impact as a Photographer
55. Why the World Needs More Bloggers
56. DOMAIN EXPERTISE.
57. The Joy of Speculation
58. MAKE A NAME FOR YOURSELF.
59. Propogate
60. Meaningful Advantage or Not?
61. PHOTO CREATOR.
62. NOW IS YOUR DECISIVE MOMENT.
63. I CANNOT BE IGNORED
64. Photography Blogs are Highly *UNDERRATED*
65. What is Your Competitive Advantage?
66. Why 4K?
67. Indirect Monetization
68. The Future of Innovation in Photography
69. Photography Innovation and Image Selection Idea: Let Google (YouTube) Suggested Thumbnail Pick Your Best Photo? 
70. How to Identify Your Competitive Advantage
71. In Praise of Insanely Fast Wifi
72. DIGITAL PUBLISHING IS KING.
73. The Stoic-Entrepreneurship Mindset
74. Marketing Tips for Photographers
75. STARK DIFFERENTIATION
76. MAXIMALIST
77. Visual Entrepreneurship
78. On Becoming a Full-Stack Visual Entrepreneur
79. Real Photographers Don’t Use Instagram
80. Brave New World of Blogging
81. Don’t Go to Photography School
82. Mass Success is a Failure?
83. How to Maximize Your Archimedes Lever in Life
84. Maximize Your Archimedes Lever
85. How to Create Value Out of Nothing
86. The Best Brand is No Brand
87. What Do We Entrepreneurs *Really* Want?
88. You Were Destined to Do Great Things
89. Just Share Your Photos on Your Own Blog
90. Your Blog is the Ultimate Form of Social Media
91. The Future of Websites and Blogs
92. Create a Company
93. Money Photography Project
94. WHY IT IS GOOD TO CHARGE MONEY FOR YOUR SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
95. Google and YouTube SEO (Search Engine Optimization) 101: How Would You Type It?
96. WHY RIGHT NOW IS THE BEST TIME FOR YOU TO START YOUR SIDE HUSTLE
97. Digital Photography is the Future
98. NEVER STOP EXPERIMENTING!
99. WHAT IS INNOVATION?
100. A Non-Ownership Future
101. CONTROL OVER MONEY
102. Economic Constraints Are Creative Constraints
103. Become a Sole-Proprietor
104. Entrepreneurship is a Mindset
105. How to Master Mac
106. The Future of Lifestyle
107. Necessity is the Mother of Innovation
108. Once We Have an Easy Life, Then What?
109. Why I Don’t Read Comments
110. YouTube SEO (Search Engine Optimization) for Photographers
111. How to Become a Self-Employed Photographer
112. How to Live Big With Little Money
113. Why Blogging, Vlogging and Internet Media is More Important than Ever
114. No Marketing, No Future
115. Photography Marketing 101
116. Google and YouTube are King
117. Why I’m So Suspicious of Everyone Online and on the Internet
118. How to Become More Notorious
119. Kaizen Approach to Blogging
120. How to Master Marketing
121. CREATE WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE SEE MANIFESTED IN THE WORLD!
122. Anti Silicon-Valley Thinking
123. Your Name
124. In Praise of WordPress
125. NEVER STOP POSTING
126. Your Future Portfolio is a Website
127. Infinite Runway
128. ERIC KIM ATTITUDE
129. Financial Independence as a Road to Freedom of Speech?
130. WHY OPEN SOURCE IS THE FUTURE
131. Just Post It.
132. Posts Are Products
133. Photography Entrepreneurship Ideas
134. YOU ARE KING.
135. You’re Always in BETA MODE
136. Build Your Own Media Empire
137. WHY I DON’T MONETIZE MY YOUTUBE VIDEOS
138. Why I Became an Entrepreneur
139. The Uber-Photographer
140. Create What You Would Like to See Manifested in the World
141. Create the Future
142. Entrepreneurship is Best During Uncertain Times
143. Photography Entrepreneurship 101 Presentation by ERIC KIM
144. Your Body is the Brand
145. Your Name is Your Brand
146. Create Your Own Social Media Platform
147. BUILD IT OR BUY IT?
148. Sell Yourself
149. Create New
150. Insta-Slaves
151. YOU CANNOT FAKE ENTHUSIASM
152. Why Hybrid is the Future
153. Don’t Censor Yourself
154. HOW I MASTERED MARKETING
155. ERIC KIM BLOGS
156. If Someone Offers You Help, You’re Stupid to *NOT* Take It.
157. SEEK GREAT, NOT PERFECT.
158. How I Became So Famous
159. Let Reality Mould Itself to You
160. ANTI ENTITLEMENT MENTALITY
161. Live Your Life as If You Were a Billionaire
162. HOW I THINK DIFFERENT
163. Impact, Influence, Reach: The Three Pillars of Marketing
164. ERIC KIM SCHOOL
165. Classicism.
166. MY PHILOSOPHY OF MONEY
167. Money is Movement
168. Elitism 2.0
169. Mass Market or Luxury Market?
170. Why You Must Market Yourself
171. Why You Must Start an Email Newsletter
172. How Laptops Can Change the World
173. What Do You Want to Become?
174. What is Really Holding You Back in Life?
175. Why I Write: Writing as Meta-Thinking
176. ADVERTISE YOURSELF
177. Use Your First and Last Name
178. How Blogging Can Change the World
179. In Praise of Liberty
180. How I Write in Markdown
181. How I Became So Influential on YouTube
182. REVERSE FLEX
183. What a Time to Be Alive in Today’s Brave New World of Photography
184. HOW TO DIFFERENTIATE YOURSELF FROM OTHERS
185. YOU CHOOSE YOU
186. My Life Photography Entrepreneurship Story
187. WHY I DON’T BELIEVE IN COLLABORATION
188. My Entrepreneurship Mindset
189. YOU’RE THE HERO IN THIS GAME OF LIFE
190. My Money Philosophy
191. Why Brand and Market Yourself?
192. PROFESSIONALISM IS FOR SUCKERS
193. Just Share What Works for You
194. How to Create Your Own Platform
195. Living in a Post Monetary Society
196. In Praise of Blogging
197. The Entrepreneurial Lifestyle is the Best Lifestyle
198. Algorithm Slavery
199. ANTI VIEWS
200. Entrepreneurship is The Goal
201. The Art of Blogging
202. IN PRAISE OF PURSUING YOUR PASSION
203. How to Make Great Titles
204. Sole Proprietorship
205. Just Build It.
206. VIA NEGATIVA
207. PROMOTE YOURSELF
208. Become a Full-Stack Entrepreneur
209. How to Entertain Others
210. My Experience Teaching My First Online Photography Creativity Workshop on Zoom
211. Humans Aren’t Lazy
212. One Shot.
213. THE BRAVE SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH
214. The Brave New COVID Lifestyle
215. Start Your Own Business
216. Minimum Viable Income ( MVI)
217. TRAINING.
218. WHY VIDEO?
219. How to Become Bolder
220. You’ve Always Already Been a Photography Entrepreneur!
221. The Future is All Digital Everything
222. Digital Sharecropping
223. DO IT FOR YOUR PAST AND FUTURE SELF
224. In Praise of Buffer and Redundancy
225. ASKING FOR PERMISSION IS FOR SUCKERS.
226. POST-MONETARY SOCIETY.
227. Advertise Your Own Stuff
228. THE FUTURE IS DIGITAL.
229. Simulated Universal Basic Income
230. Is Losing Followers a Good Thing?
231. How to Add to Economic Activity
232. DIGITAL CAPITALISM
233. MONEY IS MOVEMENT
234. Anything is Possible
235. BRAVE NEW WORLD OF DIGITAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
236. GENERATE
237. How to Profit from Calamity
238. Capitalism 2.0
239. WHY I’M SO PASSIONATE ABOUT INFORMATION
240. SOCIETY 2.0
241. PHOENIX ENTREPENEURSHIP
242. How to Make Art from Home
243. BUY YOURSELF
244. JUST BLOG IT.
245. MARKET YOURSELF
246. EXPENSIVE TALK
247. SOCIAL MEDIA SLAVERY
248. Who Are Your Ideal Followers?
249. Why I Blog, Vlog, and Log
250. Your Perspective is Irrefutable
251. What are Your Hidden Powers?
252. IMPACT MAXIMIZATION, not Profit Maximization
253. Our Desire to Maximize Impact and Change
254. 10 Rich Tips How to Make Money from Photography
255. Create What You Would Love to Consume
256. Publish is Pleasure
257. Retire Now
258. Do You Desire to Become the Best?
259. Solo Entrepreneurship
260. My Vision of Photography Entrepreneurship
261. PUT YOUR NAME ON IT
262. The Desire to Transcend Ourselves
263. MONEY THOUGHTS
264. How to Retire
265. Via Negativa Productivity
266. Why You Must Make Your Own Website
267. Individuals over Companies
268. Build Yourself
269. Success is Survival
270. Why You Shouldn’t Go to Photography or Art School
271. How to Differentiate Yourself as a Photographer
272. Surpass Yourself
     
273. Can You Handle Extreme Freedom?
274. Boutique or Mass Market?
275. Proof of Concept
276. Unified Field Theory for Photography
277. Build a Company You’d Never Sell
278. Play the Long Game
279. Entrepreneurship and Art
280. What is the Source of our Strength?
281. What’s the Future for Photography?
282. Full-Stack Visual Artist
283. Why Scale?
284. What is Your Unfair Advantage?
285. Substance Marketing
286. Share Your Dopeness with Others
287. Frugality is Freedom
288. Minimum Viable Product (MVP) for Entrepreneurship
289. Don’t Follow or Predict Trends, Start Your Own Trend!
290. If You’re Not Busy Growing, You’re Busy Dying
291. Entrepreneurship born from Superabundance, not Need/Necessity
292. Photography Entrepreneurship Philosophy
293. How to Master Marketing in Photography
294. Photography Entrepreneurship Tips and Ideas
295. Is Hustle Sufficient Unto Success?
296. Don’t do it for the money
297. DIGITAL MARXISM
298. Zen Entrepreneurship
299. BOLDER IS BETTER.
300. Streamers Shall Inherit the Earth

Photography Blogging

• Blogging is Public Meditations
• The Art of Blogging
• Give Me a Laptop and I Shall Move the World!
• The Future is Photography Blogging
• How to Become a GREAT Blogger
• If you can’t code, blog instead!
• Daily Blog of Activities
• How to Monetize a Blog Without Advertising
• How to Publish Yourself
• How to Blog
• The future of photography publishing is photography blogging.
• Why Become a Photography Blogger?
• Why You Must Become a Photography Blogger
• Why You Should Delete Your Instagram and Start Your Own Blog

Money

• How to Use Wealth
• To Become Rich, Don’t Go Broke
• Why Save Money?
• Less Money, Less Problems

Self-Empowerment

• Life is Too Short to Be Negative
• Why You Must Follow Your Passion in Life
• How to Conquer Shyness
• Don’t Ask for Permission
• Onto the Next One
• Why You Must Self-Promote Yourself
• Why You Must Conquer Your Fears in Life

Marketing and Branding

• Why You Must Become a Photography Blogger
• Why Blog?
• Why You Must Self-Promote Yourself
• Create Substance, Not Content
• Photography Marketing and Branding 101
• How to Master Marketing in Photography
• 10 Tips How to Become a More Famous Photographer

Entrepreneurship Lifestyle

• Why Hustle?
• Why Save Money?
• Ascetic is Sexy
• Why You Must Become Self-Employed
• How to Push Yourself Beyond the Limit
• Is Location Independence Overrated?

Entrepreneurship Mindset

• How to Get Discovered
• Financial Independence
• Disregard Success or Failure; Always Attempt More!
• In Praise of Stubbornness
• Success is Personal Bravery
• Why You Must Become an Entrepreneur
• How to Brand and Market Yourself as a Photographer
• How to Conquer Haters
• How to Accumulate Capital
• Why Be Different?
• How to Master Marketing in Photography
• Don’t Play it Safe
• Why Blog?
• How to Be a More Productive Photographer
• How to Hustle
• True Productivity
• What Can Only You Do?
• Love Risk
• What is Success?
• Fill a Vacuum
• Think Big
• What is Your Dream in Life?
• 8 Blogging Productivity Tips
• Why Be Normal?
• How Much Suffering Are You Willing to Endure to Achieve Your Dreams?

---

Photography Entrepreneurship 101

• Don’t Sit Still!
• Bitcoin for Photographers
• Don’t Be Timid
• Why Start Your Own Photography Blog?
• Fill a Void
• 1,000 True Followers: How to Build Your Own Niche in Photography
• Photography Entrepreneurship 101: Why You Must Start Your Own Email Newsletter
• TURBO CREATION: Why a Maxed-Out MacBook Laptop is the Best Investment You Can Make for Photography Entrepreneurship

Life and Productivity Hacks

• My Ultimate Productivity and Life Hacks
• Life/Productivity Hack: Write (Type on a phone) While Walking on a Dynamic Treadmill
• ERIC KIM Life, Creativity, and Productivity Hacks

How to Make a Living from Your Passion

• Digital Nomad Photographer
• Build Your Own Instagram!
• How to Be More Ambitious
• Do It Your Way
• How to Measure Your Progress as a Photography Entrepreneur + Come Up With New Ideas
• How to Make a Living From Your Passion in Photography

Put a Dent in the Universe.

• Fear Disguised as Reason
• Distraction is the Enemy
• Innovate for the Sake of Innovating!
• Reality is Malleable!
• Stoic Entrepreneurship
• Against Self-Preservation
• The Purpose of Life is to Make New Stuff!

How to Succeed as an Entrepreneur

• You Have No Limits.
• Calculated Risk-Taking
• Invest in Yourself
• The Secret of Happiness: Shoot for the Moon!
• Moonshot Thinking
• Why We Should all Be Photography Entrepreneurs
• Memento Mori Entrepreneurship
• Why it is Better to Beg For Forgiveness than Ask For Permission
• How to Become a Digital Nomad
• Why You Must Own Your Own Platform
• First Principle Thinking for Photography Entrepreneurs
• How I Became a Digital Nomad
• Better to Beg For Forgiveness than Ask For Permission!
• Spurn Pleasing Others!
• Create Your Own Niche
• How to Gain More Exposure For Your Photography
• Intense Focus
• How to Conquer Your Fears as an Entrepreneur
• Define Yourself
• Let Dissatisfaction Drive You Forward!
• It Doesn’t Matter if Someone Else Has Done it Before!
• How to Succeed as a Photography Entrepreneur: Be Extremely Resourceful
• Open Source Business Model in Photography Entrepreneurship
• Entrepreneurship 101: Growth and Innovation Over Self-Preservation
• How to Create Value as a Photography Entrepreneur
• Why Become a Photography Entrepreneur?
• Why You Must Ignore Nay-Sayers to Succeed in Entrepreneurship, Business, and Life

---

The Modern Photographer: Tips, Strategies, and Tactics to Thrive as a Visual Artist in the Digital Age

Marketing, Branding, Entrepreneurship Principles For Success

MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER is your new philosophical and practical primer to succeed as a modern photographer in today’s digital world.

• MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER KINDLE EDITION ON AMAZON
• SEE ALL PRODUCTS ON AMAZON

---

Business Mental Models

• How to Succeed as a Photography Entrepreneur: Be Extremely Resourceful
• Open Source Business Model in Photography Entrepreneurship
• Entrepreneurship 101: Growth and Innovation Over Self-Preservation

---

How to Monetize Your Photography

• Photography Entrepreneurship 101: INFLUENCE
• Should I Monetize My Passion for Photography?
• 10 Practical Photography Monetization Strategies: Pricing, Google SEO, & Entrepreneurship
• How to Make Money From Street Photography

---

Why Become a Photography Entrepreneur?

Take control of your own photographic destiny:

1. Photography Startup Manual
2. PHOTOGRAPHY ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANUAL
3. On Risk Taking and Entrepreneurship

---

THE MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER

• CREATIVE CAPITALISM
• How to Monetize Your Photography
• 5 Practical Photography Career Tips and Advice
• 10x Thinking
• How to Hustle as a Photographer
• How to Become Your Own Master Marketer
• The ‘T’ Technique of Success
• Go Ahead and Sell Out
• What is Your Unique Voice?
• Why You Must Self-Promote Yourself
• What is Your Unique Angle as a Photographer?
• Photography Content Marketing 101
• Why You Must Become Your Own Publisher
• The Art of Cross-Pollination in Photography

---

Photography Entrepreneurship Articles

• Why You Shouldn’t Trust Your Pictures to Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and Flickr
• How to Make Money From Your Photography
• Photography SEO and Blogging: How to Become Number One on Google
• Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Motivation
•  Now is the Best Time to Be a Photographer
• PRODUCERISM
• What Is The Value of a Picture?
• Your Photographic Labor is Not Free

PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOPS 101

• Chapter 1. How to Make a Photography Blog
• Chapter 2. How to Price Yourself
• Chapter 3. How to Find Your Market
• Chapter 4. Why Teach Workshops?
• Chapter 5. How to Build Trust
• Chapter 6. How to Market Yourself
• Chapter 7: Why Should Someone Attend Your Workshop?

---

KEYS TO SUCCESS

• Why You Must Be a “Personality” in Order to Succeed
• THRIVE OR DIE.
• Impatience is a Virtue
• Create Your Own Category
• HOW TO DREAM BIG.
• Will Not or Cannot?
• Why Not?
• How to Think BIG
• How to Stay Ahead of the Curve
• How to Invest in Yourself
• The Two Camera Rule
• MEANINGFUL DIFFERENTIATION
• Advice For College Students
• How to Thrive in Uncertain Times
• CANNIBALIZE YOURSELF.
• DO AND GROW RICH
• Does Fear of Punishment Hold You Back?
• HOW TO GET MORE FOLLOWERS
• How to Innovate
• How to Build Your Own Empire
• YOU ARE ENTITLED TO HARD WORK.
• PICK YOURSELF.
• OWN YOUR PLATFORM
• 10 KEYS TO SUCCESS

Table of Contents

Learn how to make a living from your passion:

• Preface. BRAVE NEW WORLD OF PHOTOGRAPHY
• Chapter 1. How to Create Value
• Chapter 2. ZEN CAPITALISM
• Chapter 3. Scarcity
• Chapter 4. How to Brand Yourself
• Chapter 5. How to Build a True Following
• Chapter 6. The Blueprint to Success in Photography
• Chapter 7. HOW TO BE BOLD
• Chapter 8. How to Sell Out
• Chapter 9. GO AGAINST THE GRAIN
• Chapter 10. EXTREME ABUNDANCE
• Chapter 11. Photography Experience Economy
• Chapter 12. Why You Should Make Money for Your Photography
• Chapter 13. How to Become a Famous Photographer

---

Photography Business 101

• Practical Photography Business Advice

How to Make Money with Photography

• How to Charge More Money in Your Photography
• Why You Should Not Pursue Photography as Career
• Can Photography Make You Rich?
• How I Earn $200,000+ a Year From Photography
• How to earn $10,000 a month as a photographer
• Why you must be an expensive photographer

Photography Marketing 101

• Why Have More Followers?
• Why You Should Do Photography Work For Free
• How I Became an Internet Famous Photographer
• Photography Blogging Ideas
• Why You Should Promote Your Own Name
• How to Build a Following
• How to Stand Out as a Photographer.
• HOW TO GO VIRAL AS A PHOTOGRAPHER.
• How to Master Marketing
• How to Sell Yourself

---

How to Hustle.

• Entrepreneurial Advice to My 18 Year Old Self
• How to Become Insanely Productive.
• 5 Lessons From Hesiod on Hustling

Entrepreneurial Principles

• It is Better to Beg For Forgiveness Than Ask For Permission
• The Free Way to Become Rich
• JUST DO IT.
• 7 Steps: How to Make a Living From Your Passion
• How to Do What You Love for a Living
• How to Create an MVP (Minimum Viable Product)
• How to Fail Big
• How to Invest in Yourself
• How to Be Bold in Photography and Life
• Mission: Cover Your Rent and Food
• 1,000 True Fans
• The “10x Principle”: The Only Difference Between “Success” and “Failure”
• Make More Value Not Money
• We Live in a Photo Utopia

How to be a Full-time Photographer

• How to Make a Living From Photography
• The 3 Principles of Making Money With Photography
• Advice for Aspiring Full-Time Photographers
• Don’t Go Into Debt For Your Photography
• How to Brand Yourself as a Photographer
• Trust: The Most Important Thing You Need to Succeed as a Photographer

Photography Blogging

• How to become rich from photography blogging
• How to Make a Living with Blogging
• 50 Blogging Tips For Beginners
• How to Start Your Own Photography Blog
• A Photographer’s Guide to SEO, Blogging, and Social Media

How to Teach Photography

• How to Become a Photography Teacher
• How to Teach a Street Photography Class
• Why I Teach Street Photography Workshops

Social Media

• Why I Deleted My Instagram
• The Social Media Blackbook for Photographers
• Why Do You Need More Likes or Followers?
• Instagram is Going to Be the Next Facebook
• Don’t Trust “Free” Photography Social Networks

How to Save Money

• How Cindy Saved Us $150,000+
• The Free Way to Become Rich

START HERE >

MONEY 101

1. Just Follow the Money
2. My Money Philosophy
3. Eternal fame and glory over money
4. The Trillion Dollar Question: How to Make Money on the Internet Without Advertising?
5. Entrepreneurship that Doesn’t Involve Money-Making?
6. Money Ain’t Real
7. Making Money for Fun, Not to Get Rich
8. Why Money?

Bitcoin and AI, as well as fitness and art!

Optimism is the solution!

I want to become the next Peter Thiel?

BLACK GOLD CAPITAL

BLACK EAGLE CAPITAL

You need my money, I don’t need you

I said no to the Super Bowl! You need me I don’t need you — Jay Z

Economics by KIM

1. How to FIRE (Financial Independence Retire Early)
2. How to *Save* a Million Dollars
3. Increase Value
4. MAYBE IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO BUY HIGH
5. Banks Are the True Menace to Society
6. THE PROMISE OF FUTURE MONOPOLY PROFITS?
7. High gas prices are good
8. What is Capitalism?
9. Pride in What You Paid For
10. On Making Money from Nothing
11. Save Money Towards What Ends?
12. No Regret Investment

The optimism!

I love it all! I love it! I love all people!

TikTok is a popular social media platform that allows users to create and share short videos, often set to music. The app is owned by ByteDance Ltd., a technology company founded in 2012 by Chinese entrepreneur Zhang Yiming. ByteDance is headquartered in Beijing, China, and operates several content platforms globally.

Connections to the Chinese Government and Communist Party:

• Legal Obligations: Like all companies operating in China, ByteDance is subject to Chinese laws and regulations. This includes the National Intelligence Law of 2017, which can compel organizations to assist in intelligence gathering.
• Data Security Concerns: There have been widespread concerns that the Chinese government could access TikTok’s user data. TikTok has repeatedly denied sharing data with the Chinese government and has taken steps to distance its operations from China. For example, TikTok stores international user data on servers outside of China, specifically in the United States and Singapore.
• Corporate Governance: ByteDance has a Communist Party committee within the company, which is common among large Chinese firms. This committee can influence company decisions, aligning them with national interests.

Potential Relations for Politics in America:

• National Security Concerns: U.S. officials and lawmakers have expressed fears that TikTok could be used for espionage or influence operations by the Chinese government. Concerns include data privacy, surveillance, and the potential for content manipulation to spread propaganda or misinformation.
• Legislative Actions: Several bills have been introduced in Congress aiming to restrict or ban TikTok in the United States. Some states have already banned the app on government devices. In March 2023, the Biden administration demanded that ByteDance divest its stake in TikTok or face a possible nationwide ban.
• TikTok’s Response: TikTok has undertaken efforts to alleviate these concerns, such as Project Texas, which aims to store U.S. user data on American soil through a partnership with Oracle. The company has also increased transparency by allowing audits of its algorithms and content moderation policies.
• Diplomatic Tensions: The TikTok controversy is part of broader U.S.-China tensions involving trade, technology, and security. Actions taken against TikTok could impact diplomatic relations and have economic repercussions for both countries.
• Public Opinion and Legal Challenges: A ban could face legal challenges on grounds of free speech and could be unpopular among the app’s millions of U.S. users. TikTok has launched public relations campaigns to showcase its commitment to user privacy and security.

In summary, TikTok’s ownership by ByteDance, a Chinese company subject to Chinese laws, has led to concerns about potential connections to the Chinese government and the Communist Party. These concerns have significant implications for U.S. politics, fueling debates over national security, data privacy, and the regulation of foreign technology companies.

xx

TikTok is a social media platform owned by ByteDance Ltd., a technology company headquartered in Beijing, China. Founded in 2012 by Zhang Yiming, ByteDance has grown rapidly to become one of the world’s most valuable startups, thanks in part to the global success of TikTok.

Connections to the Chinese Government and Communist Party

ByteDance, like all companies operating in China, is subject to Chinese laws and regulations. This includes compliance with government directives on data security, censorship, and other matters. The Chinese government has laws that can compel companies to share data and cooperate with intelligence activities, such as the National Intelligence Law of 2017.

While ByteDance maintains that TikTok operates independently of its Chinese counterpart (Douyin) and stores international user data outside of China, concerns have been raised about the potential for the Chinese government to access TikTok user data or influence its content moderation policies. These concerns stem from the close relationship that can exist between Chinese companies and the state, as well as the legal obligations companies have under Chinese law.

Impact on Politics in the United States

TikTok has become a focal point in U.S. politics due to national security and privacy concerns. U.S. officials have expressed worries that the Chinese government could access American users’ data or use the platform to spread propaganda and misinformation. This has led to several significant developments:

1. Federal Actions: In August 2020, former President Donald Trump issued executive orders aimed at banning TikTok in the United States or forcing the sale of its U.S. operations to an American company. These actions were challenged in court and eventually revoked by President Joe Biden in June 2021, who ordered a security review of foreign-owned apps instead.
2. Legislative Proposals: Various bills have been introduced in Congress to address the perceived risks associated with TikTok. Proposals have ranged from banning the app on government devices to broader measures that could restrict its operation in the U.S.
3. State-Level Restrictions: Multiple U.S. states have taken action to ban TikTok on government-issued devices, citing security concerns.
4. Public Hearings: In March 2023, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified before Congress to address lawmakers’ questions about data privacy, security practices, and the company’s relationship with the Chinese government

TikTok is owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company founded by Zhang Yiming in 2012. ByteDance operates globally, with major platforms like TikTok for international markets and Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, for users in mainland China. While ByteDance claims to be a private company, it has complex ownership, with about 60% held by global investors (including U.S. entities), 20% by employees, and 20% by its Chinese founders.

The relationship between ByteDance and the Chinese government has been a significant point of controversy. While the Chinese government holds a 1% stake in ByteDance’s Chinese subsidiary that operates Douyin, it also has a seat on its board. This stake, while small, raises concerns about potential influence. Additionally, China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law requires Chinese companies to cooperate with the government for national intelligence efforts, leading to fears that ByteDance could be compelled to share TikTok user data with Chinese authorities, despite ByteDance’s insistence to the contrary.

U.S. officials, including the FBI, have voiced concerns that ByteDance is “beholden” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Though there is no definitive public evidence that TikTok has shared user data with the Chinese government, the structure and legal framework in China make it difficult to rule out potential influence. This has prompted calls in the U.S. for ByteDance to divest from TikTok or face restrictions, as many U.S. lawmakers fear that TikTok could be used as a tool for Chinese government influence or surveillance oai_citation:2,PolitiFact | Who owns TikTok’s parent company? Despite what Brian Kilmeade says, it’s not the Chinese government oai_citation:1,Q&A: TikTok Owner Is Essentially ‘Subsidiary’ of China’s Communist Party, US Lawmaker Says.

Yes! If anything, maybe the thought should be in order to create more we have to consume less! For example, assuming that we media creators are druglords, or drug dealers… The rule of every single druglord is “don’t get high off your own supply”.

so I’m actually curious, all these HBO Max, Warner Brothers discovery executives, how much television and shows and movies do they actually watch?

Now the funny ethical thing or the thought is; “isn’t it unethical to make YouTube videos and upload to YouTube videos when you yourself don’t want YouTube or YouTube videos?” I beg to differ.

Trip you told, the only reason I even use YouTube is that it is really the only legitimate place that you could upload videos and actually have people find the videos. Google has essentially conquered a long time ago, and then authorized online video. Everybody watches YouTube, your two year-old nephew, your 70-year-old mom, and everyone in between.

One of feelings I have, sooner or later — I think eventually TikTok will fall, especially if Donald Trump gets elected president. From what I understand, essentially bytedance who owns TikTok, are essentially in bed obviously with the Chinese communist party the CCP.

In an era where the world is saturated with images, videos, and a constant stream of information, we find ourselves at a crossroads. The omnipresence of media isn’t just shaping our reality—it is our reality. Every moment is a potential post, every thought a potential tweet. But amidst this digital cacophony, have we paused to ask ourselves: What drives us to create media? This is the essence of “The Will to Media, The Will to Create Media.”

Drawing inspiration from Nietzsche’s concept of the “Will to Power,” our drive to create media is more than just a desire to communicate; it’s an intrinsic urge to assert our existence, to leave a mark on the ever-expanding digital canvas. We don’t just consume media—we’re compelled to produce it, to contribute our voices to the global conversation.

But why? Is it the allure of likes, shares, and fleeting digital affirmations? Or is it something deeper? I believe it’s about identity and legacy. Through creating media, we define ourselves and how we wish to be perceived. It’s a declaration: “I am here. I experience. I contribute.”

Yet, in this relentless pursuit to produce and share, there’s a danger of losing authenticity. The algorithms favor what’s trending, what’s sensational—not necessarily what’s genuine. We risk becoming echoes of others, our creations mere reflections of what’s popular rather than what’s personal.

So, how do we reclaim our creative sovereignty? It begins with introspection. Create media not for external validation but as an extension of your true self. Let your work be a manifestation of your passions, your curiosities, your unique perspective on the world. When you decide to share something—a photograph, a piece of writing, a video—ask yourself: Does this represent who I am? Does it contribute meaningfully to the discourse?

Embrace the process of creation as a form of self-discovery. In street photography, for instance, it’s not just about capturing images; it’s about engaging with your environment, connecting with strangers, and finding stories in the mundane. It’s a meditative practice that grounds you in the present moment.

Consuming media also requires mindfulness. Be selective about what you let into your mental space. The media you consume influences your thoughts, your mood, and ultimately, the media you create. Seek out content that challenges you, that broadens your horizons, that inspires you to think differently.

Remember, the tools we have at our disposal are powerful. A camera, a smartphone, a social media account—they’re gateways to vast audiences. With that power comes responsibility. We can choose to add to the noise, or we can strive to produce work that resonates, that enlightens, that connects on a deeper level.

“The Will to Media” is not just about the act of creating; it’s about intention. It’s about harnessing our innate drive to share and using it to foster genuine connections and understanding. It’s about resisting the pull of superficial engagement and instead, delving into meaningful expression.

In the end, we’re all participants in this grand tapestry of digital storytelling. Each of us has a unique thread to contribute. So, let’s commit to creating media that reflects our true selves, that honors our experiences, and that adds value to the lives of others.

Stay true to your vision, embrace your creative will, and let your voice be heard—not as an echo, but as an original.

a personal thought; any media which actually last; there must be some sort of autotelic purpose and passion

Bodybuilding was and still is king!

Pretty easy —

First, don’t make it a goal to gain weight. One of the big things here is that at least for men, the ethos telos and desire is to gain weight.

All beta everything!

Tokenization — and moral posturing.

xxx

Language evolves over time, and terms that were once deemed appropriate or politically correct can become outdated or even offensive as societal understanding and sensitivities change. Here are some examples of words and phrases that fit this description:

1. “Oriental”

• Past Usage: Used to describe people or things from East Asia.
• Current View: Considered outdated and offensive when referring to people, as it objectifies and exoticizes Asian individuals. Preferred terms are “Asian” or specifying the country of origin, such as “Chinese” or “Japanese.”

1. “Negro”

• Past Usage: Commonly used in the early to mid-20th century to refer to African Americans; appeared in official contexts like the “United Negro College Fund.”
• Current View: Now regarded as outdated and offensive. Preferred terms are “Black,” “African American,” or specifying nationality when appropriate.

1. “Colored”

• Past Usage: Used to describe non-white individuals, particularly African Americans.
• Current View: Seen as antiquated and offensive. The term “people of color” is acceptable as a broad category for non-white individuals, but “colored” is not appropriate.

1. “Handicapped”

• Past Usage: A common term for individuals with disabilities.
• Current View: Considered insensitive as it emphasizes limitations. Preferred terms are “persons with disabilities” or “disabled individuals,” focusing on the person rather than the disability.

1. “Mentally Retarded”

• Past Usage: A clinical term used to describe individuals with intellectual disabilities.
• Current View: Now deemed offensive due to negative connotations and misuse as an insult. Preferred terms are “intellectually disabled” or “person with an intellectual disability.”

1. “Third World Countries”

• Past Usage: Referred to countries not aligned with NATO (First World) or the Communist Bloc (Second World) during the Cold War.
• Current View: Viewed as derogatory and misleading. Preferred terms are “developing countries,” “low-income countries,” or “Global South.”

1. “Eskimo”

• Past Usage: Used to describe Indigenous peoples of the Arctic regions.
• Current View: Considered offensive by some as it was a term imposed by outsiders. Preferred terms are “Inuit,” “Yupik,” or “Indigenous peoples of the Arctic,” depending on the specific group.

1. “Indian” (when referring to Indigenous peoples of the Americas)

• Past Usage: Commonly used due to historical misidentification by explorers.
• Current View: Can be confusing and is often replaced with “Native American,” “Indigenous,” or specific tribal names for clarity and respect.

1. “Homosexual”

• Past Usage: Clinical term for individuals attracted to the same sex.
• Current View: Sometimes viewed as outdated or carrying negative clinical implications. Preferred terms are “gay,” “lesbian,” or “queer,” depending on individual identity and preference.

1. “Transsexual”
   • Past Usage: Referred to individuals who have undergone medical procedures to align their physical sex with their gender identity.
   • Current View: Considered narrow and sometimes offensive. “Transgender” is the preferred, more inclusive term that encompasses a range of gender identities and experiences.
2. “Manpower”
   • Past Usage: Used to describe the workforce or labor pool.
   • Current View: Seen as gender-exclusive. Preferred terms are “workforce,” “staff,” or “personnel.”
3. “Chairman”
   • Past Usage: Title for the head of a meeting or organization.
   • Current View: Gender-specific and potentially exclusionary. Preferred terms are “chairperson” or simply “chair.”
4. “Mankind”
   • Past Usage: Referred to humanity as a whole.
   • Current View: Considered gender-exclusive. Preferred terms are “humankind,” “humanity,” or “people.”
5. “Ghetto”
   • Past Usage: Used to describe urban areas with a high concentration of minority residents.
   • Current View: Can carry negative stereotypes and implications. Preferred to describe areas by their actual names or as “underserved” or “under-resourced communities.”
6. “Illegal Alien”
   • Past Usage: Legal term for someone residing in a country unlawfully.
   • Current View: Considered dehumanizing. Preferred terms are “undocumented immigrant” or “unauthorized immigrant.”

Understanding the Shift

• Cultural Sensitivity: Increased awareness of how language affects marginalized groups has led to changes in preferred terminology.
• Focus on the Individual: Modern language trends emphasize person-first language (e.g., “person with a disability” rather than “disabled person”) to highlight individuality beyond a single characteristic.
• Avoiding Stereotypes: Terms that generalize or stereotype are being replaced with more precise language that respects diversity within groups.

Conclusion

Staying informed about the evolving nature of language is important for respectful communication. Using current, accepted terms helps promote inclusion and demonstrates cultural sensitivity. When in doubt, it’s considerate to ask individuals how they prefer to be identified or to consult reputable style guides and organizational guidelines.

The term “politically correct” has evolved significantly since its inception, reflecting changes in political and cultural landscapes.

Early Usage:

• 1930s-1940s: The phrase originated within Marxist-Leninist circles in the early 20th century. It was used to describe strict adherence to the Communist Party’s policies and ideology. Being “politically correct” meant aligning with the party line, often without question.

Mid-20th Century:

• 1960s-1970s: During the social and civil rights movements in the United States, the term began to surface in leftist and feminist contexts. It was sometimes used humorously or critically within progressive groups to highlight rigid or dogmatic attitudes.

Modern Usage:

• 1980s-1990s: The term entered mainstream discourse, especially in the United States and the United Kingdom. It was frequently used pejoratively by conservative commentators to criticize what they saw as excessive liberal emphasis on language and policies designed to avoid offending particular groups in society.
• Academic and Cultural Debates: Universities became focal points for discussions on political correctness, with debates over curriculum content, speech codes, and inclusive language. Critics argued that political correctness suppressed free speech and open debate, while supporters contended that it promoted respect and equity for marginalized communities.

21st Century Context:

• Ongoing Discussions: The term remains a contentious part of political and cultural dialogue. It is often invoked in debates over cancel culture, identity politics, and social justice movements. The rise of social media has amplified these discussions, with rapid dissemination of ideas and increased public engagement.

Global Perspective:

• While “politically correct” originated in Western contexts, similar concepts have appeared worldwide, reflecting universal tensions between tradition and progressive change.

Conclusion:

The evolution of “politically correct” mirrors broader societal shifts regarding language, power dynamics, and inclusivity. Initially a term denoting strict political adherence, it has become a symbol of the ongoing struggle to balance respectful discourse with freedom of expression. Understanding its history provides insight into contemporary debates over how societies negotiate differences and strive toward mutual respect.

“The Diversity Myth” in the Voice of Eric Kim, Quoting Peter Thiel

In The Diversity Myth, Peter Thiel challenges one of the most persistent narratives of modern academic and corporate culture: that diversity, in its many forms, is an unequivocal good. He argues that rather than promoting true intellectual diversity, institutions that emphasize diversity in terms of race, gender, and other identity markers often suppress the very ideals they claim to uphold. Instead of encouraging open dialogue and dissent, they create environments where conformity to a dominant ideology is expected.

Thiel’s thesis draws attention to a fundamental contradiction: in the pursuit of diversity, many institutions have become more homogenous in their thinking. “Far from fostering diversity of thought,” Thiel writes, “the culture of political correctness suppresses dissent, promoting a narrow orthodoxy.” This resonates with my own observations, where efforts to increase representation often lead to a narrowing of acceptable viewpoints.

As someone who has spent time in both academic settings and the corporate world, I’ve seen firsthand how the ideal of diversity can be co-opted to reinforce power structures rather than dismantle them. While the original intention may have been to bring new voices into the conversation, in practice, the outcome is often the opposite. New perspectives are sidelined if they don’t align with the prevailing ideological trends. Thiel’s critique of this system is not a dismissal of diversity as a concept but a call to recognize the complexity of the issue. He challenges us to ask: What kind of diversity do we truly value?

For Thiel, the real threat is not the diversity of backgrounds but the diversity of thought. By focusing too heavily on identity-based diversity, we risk losing sight of the intellectual diversity that once made academic institutions vibrant centers of debate and innovation. In his words, “The obsession with identity politics is crowding out the ability to ask the more difficult and less comfortable questions.” It’s here that The Diversity Myth finds its sharpest critique: a system designed to foster inclusivity has, paradoxically, become exclusive in its intellectual rigor.

Thiel’s broader philosophical argument is one that resonates with many in Silicon Valley, where the pursuit of disruptive innovation often clashes with the status quo. The diversity myth, in this context, is not just an issue in academia but a microcosm of a larger societal trend. The pressure to conform to a certain way of thinking, even in the name of progress, can stifle true creativity and innovation. And if we can’t challenge assumptions in the academic and corporate worlds, where does that leave us?

Ultimately, The Diversity Myth isn’t about rejecting the idea of diversity outright but about rethinking its implementation. Thiel’s message is clear: real diversity means allowing for a plurality of viewpoints, even—perhaps especially—those that make us uncomfortable. After all, it is in the contest of ideas, not the uniformity of opinion, that true progress is made.

Diversity is a term that has been celebrated, dissected, and at times, misconstrued in our modern discourse. As someone who has wandered through myriad streets across the globe, capturing faces and moments through my lens, I’ve often pondered what diversity truly means. Is it merely a mosaic of different colors and cultures, or is there something deeper we’re missing?

Peter Thiel once remarked, “The ideology of multiculturalism is a system of beliefs and attitudes that provides a simplified explanation of the world and a set of ready-made answers to its complex problems.” This quote resonates with me because it challenges us to look beyond the surface. Thiel suggests that sometimes, the pursuit of diversity becomes an end in itself, rather than a means to enrich our understanding.

In my travels, I’ve seen communities where diversity is organic—a natural tapestry woven over time. Conversely, I’ve also observed places where diversity feels orchestrated, almost as if it’s a checkbox on a societal to-do list. The difference between the two is palpable. Organic diversity fosters genuine connections and mutual respect, while forced diversity can sometimes lead to superficial interactions and unaddressed tensions.

Thiel also pointed out, “A focus on superficial diversity masks the real issues of inequality and injustice.” This statement prompts us to question whether we’re addressing the root causes of division or simply applying a veneer of diversity to conceal deeper problems. Are we celebrating diversity in a way that promotes inclusion and equality, or are we inadvertently perpetuating a myth that stalls true progress?

Photography has taught me that every individual has a story worth telling, a unique perspective shaped by personal experiences. Embracing diversity should mean valuing these stories and learning from them. It’s not about assembling a diverse group for the sake of appearances but about fostering an environment where different voices are heard and respected.

In reflecting on Thiel’s insights, it’s essential to recognize that critiquing the concept of diversity as it’s often presented doesn’t mean opposing diversity itself. Instead, it’s a call to engage with it more thoughtfully. We should strive to understand the complexities and challenges that come with fostering truly inclusive communities.

Ultimately, the myth of diversity lies in believing that mere representation is enough. True diversity goes beyond numbers; it’s about meaningful inclusion, open dialogue, and a genuine commitment to understanding one another. Let’s move past the myth and work towards a reality where diversity enriches our lives in profound and authentic ways.

One thing I’m starting to discover; sometimes you just gotta let things die. To try to preserve the old forever seems like a bad idea.

so what is the biggest issue here? There is a cult of the past, the cult of nostalgia, the weird idea that somehow the past was superior than the present? And even more weird… This strange idea that the past was supreme, and there is no possible way that the future could be superior to the past.

Optimism can only be fed on the flames that the future will be more glorious prosperous than now! And an interesting quote from Peter Thiel; the definition of being middle class: not being certain whether your kids future will be better than yours.

Think about your past self, your past body, your past workflows as being positively inferior to what it is now?

“The Virtue of Letting Things Die”

I’m walking through a city I’ve been to a thousand times before, yet it feels different. The streets are familiar, the faces are not. Something’s shifted—not just in the world, but in me. It hits me then: some things must die for new things to emerge. This moment, this recognition, is part of the cycle. The virtue of letting things die is that it allows us to become who we are meant to be, unburdened by what no longer serves us.

We live in a world that worships preservation. We want to hold on to everything—memories, relationships, objects, identities—often far beyond their natural lifespan. But holding on too long can suffocate us. When we refuse to let things die, we become stagnant, trapped in the inertia of the past. Letting go, on the other hand, requires courage. It demands that we face the discomfort of change, that we embrace the unknown. Yet, this is where growth happens.

Photography teaches me this lesson every day. Each time I press the shutter, I am capturing a fleeting moment, a split-second that will never be again. Yet, I know that I can’t hold on to it forever. Even the photograph itself, as physical or digital as it may be, will eventually fade. And that’s okay. There’s beauty in that transience. If every moment lasted forever, none would be special. It’s precisely because things are temporary that they matter.

So, what is the virtue in letting things die?

First, it clears space. We often accumulate more than we need—physically, emotionally, mentally. Old habits, outdated beliefs, possessions, and even relationships can weigh us down. They pile up until we’re suffocating under the weight of what used to be. By letting them go, we create room for something new. I think of this often as I’m editing my work, sifting through hundreds of photos to find the ones that speak to me. It’s a process of elimination, of cutting away the excess to reveal the essential. Only by letting the rest die can the best shine through.

Second, letting things die allows us to evolve. We are not the same people we were ten years ago, or even yesterday. As we grow, the things that once served us—whether possessions, ideas, or relationships—may no longer align with who we’ve become. Clinging to them only keeps us stuck in a version of ourselves that no longer exists. To evolve, we must release what we’ve outgrown. The camera that once felt like an extension of my hand might now feel cumbersome. The creative approach that once worked for me may now stifle me. I must be willing to let these things go to explore new possibilities.

Finally, death is a form of renewal. Nature understands this intuitively. The trees shed their leaves in autumn, not out of loss, but out of necessity. They know that to bloom again in spring, they must first let go. We, too, must embrace this cycle in our lives. Letting things die is not about abandonment; it’s about renewal. It’s about trusting that something better will come if we have the strength to release what no longer fits.

I often ask myself: Am I holding on out of fear, or is there still life in this? It’s a question I ask when I’m considering whether to keep a project, continue a relationship, or hold onto an idea. The answer is usually clear. When something has run its course, it begins to feel heavy, a burden rather than a joy. That’s when I know it’s time to let go.

The virtue of letting things die is in the freedom it brings. It frees us to reinvent ourselves, to try new things, to grow in unexpected directions. It liberates us from the past so we can fully inhabit the present and create a future that reflects who we are becoming, not who we once were.

In the end, life is a series of cycles—beginnings and endings, births and deaths, holding on and letting go. To live fully is to embrace these cycles, to see the beauty in each phase, and to understand that sometimes, the greatest act of love is in letting something die.

Only then can we truly live.

Walking through the ever-shifting streets, my camera captures not just images but the transient essence of life itself. Each photograph is a testament to a moment that will never come again, a fragment of time destined to fade. In embracing this ephemerality, I’ve come to appreciate the virtue of letting things die.

We live in a world obsessed with preservation—archiving memories, hoarding possessions, clinging to outdated ideas. But what if the true beauty of life lies in its impermanence? Just as a tree sheds its leaves to make way for new growth, we too must let go of what no longer serves us.

Holding onto the past can be comforting, a safety net woven from familiar threads. I recall hoarding old cameras, worn notebooks filled with past musings, even relationships that had long run their course. These attachments became anchors, weighing me down, hindering my journey forward.

There’s a profound freedom in release. Letting things die isn’t about loss; it’s about transformation. It’s recognizing that every ending ushers in a new beginning. By allowing the old to fade, we create space for growth, for innovation, for unexpected joys that were previously unimaginable.

In photography, the most compelling images often emerge from moments of transition—the flicker between light and shadow, the split second before a smile fades. These instances are powerful precisely because they’re fleeting. They remind us that life’s richness comes from its constant evolution.

Embracing the virtue of letting things die also means confronting our fears. Change is unsettling; the unknown is daunting. But stagnation is a far greater peril. When we cling too tightly, we stifle our potential, imprisoning ourselves in the comfort of the familiar.

So how do we practice this virtue? Start small. Release a possession that no longer brings you joy. Challenge a long-held belief that may be limiting you. Allow a chapter of your life to close naturally, without forcing it to linger. Each act of letting go strengthens our ability to adapt, to thrive amidst change.

Ultimately, life’s beauty is amplified when we accept its transience. By letting things die, we honor the natural rhythms of existence. We learn to appreciate moments more deeply, love more fully, and live more authentically.

The next time you find yourself resisting an ending, remember: Every sunset paves the way for a new dawn. Trust in the cycle. Embrace the virtue of letting things die, and watch as your world transforms in ways you never thought possible.

The term “Bitcoin is black gold” is likely a metaphor comparing Bitcoin to oil, historically referred to as “black gold.” Just as oil transformed the global economy by becoming a critical energy source, Bitcoin is often seen as revolutionary in the financial world due to its potential as a decentralized digital asset. The comparison suggests that, like oil, Bitcoin has immense value and could drive future economic shifts, particularly as the digital and decentralized economy grows.

This metaphor can also hint at the energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining. Mining Bitcoin requires vast computational resources and electricity, much like how oil extraction consumes significant energy. Critics of Bitcoin often point out its environmental impact, linking it to fossil fuels, while supporters emphasize its potential as a long-term, transformative asset, much like oil in the 20th century.

Eric Kim, in his discussions, frequently refers to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” acknowledging its potential for long-term value and scarcity, similar to how gold has historically been viewed oai_citation:2,Eric Kim Bitcoin Strategy – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,Spartan Economics – ERIC KIM. The “black gold” phrase could take this further, linking Bitcoin to both its potential wealth-generating capacity and its energy demands.

Why Do We Refuse to Let Old Things Die?

I stroll through the city streets, camera in hand, capturing fleeting moments that vanish as quickly as they appear. The click of the shutter freezes time, preserves a fragment of reality that will never exist again. Yet, I find myself clinging to old photographs, outdated cameras, and memories of a world that has long since changed. Why do we refuse to let old things die?

Perhaps it’s nostalgia. We romanticize the past, painting it with hues warmer than reality ever was. The worn leather of a vintage camera, the crackle of a vinyl record, the scent of an old book—they transport us to moments where we felt something profound. They are touchstones of our personal histories, anchors in a sea of constant change.

But is our attachment to the old holding us back? By fixating on what was, do we hinder what could be? The world evolves, technology advances, and new opportunities arise. Clinging to the past can become a comfortable cage, preventing us from exploring uncharted territories.

I remember resisting the shift from analog to digital photography. The tactile process of developing film, the anticipation of unseen images—it was magical. But embracing digital didn’t erase that magic; it transformed it. It opened doors to new creative possibilities, new ways of seeing and sharing the world.

We fear letting go because it feels like losing a part of ourselves. But in reality, we are ever-changing. Just as we shed cells and grow new ones, our identities are not static. Holding onto old things can sometimes be an attempt to hold onto versions of ourselves that no longer exist.

Letting old things die doesn’t mean forgetting them. It means honoring their place in our journey while making space for growth. It’s about learning from the past without being imprisoned by it.

So, why do we refuse to let old things die? Maybe because change is uncomfortable. It requires effort, vulnerability, and the courage to face the unknown. But isn’t that where the most meaningful experiences lie?

Next time you find yourself gripping tightly to something old, ask yourself: Is this serving me, or am I serving it? Letting go can be freeing. It can be the first step toward something extraordinary.

Embrace the impermanence. Welcome the new. After all, life is a constant flow, and only by moving with it can we truly live.

Why Do We Refuse to Let Old Things Die?
In the voice of Eric Kim

Human beings are creatures of habit, and our attachment to the past is deeply rooted in our psyche. The refusal to let old things die—whether it’s a product, an idea, or even a way of living—stems from an innate fear of loss, change, and the uncertainty of the future. We cling to the familiar because it provides us with a sense of identity and security, a reassurance that the world, chaotic as it may be, still holds some constants.

Sentimentality and Fear of Loss

At the heart of this refusal lies sentimentality. We attach memories, emotions, and even our identity to objects, routines, and ideas that have served us in the past. The old book on the shelf, the outdated technology in our drawer, or even the traditions passed down through generations—these are more than just things. They are markers of our personal history. To discard them feels like severing a piece of ourselves.

But this clinging is not just about holding on to happy memories. It’s about fear. The fear of losing control, of venturing into the unknown. Letting old things die forces us to confront the possibility that what comes next may be less stable or less meaningful than what we have now. This is why societies cling to antiquated practices, why businesses resist innovation, and why people hold on to dysfunctional relationships: they fear the blank space that change leaves behind.

The Myth of Eternal Relevance

Another factor at play is the myth of eternal relevance. We believe that what worked in the past will continue to work indefinitely. If something was once good, then it must always be good, right? This is a fallacy, but a seductive one. In our refusal to let go, we try to impose permanence on things that were never designed to last forever.

Take the rise of Bitcoin. People cling to traditional forms of currency, despite the clear inefficiencies and corruption in centralized banking systems, because they have been conditioned to trust the old ways. Bitcoin is the future—“digital gold”—but it’s threatening to those who refuse to let the old system die. They hold onto fiat currencies as if they can remain untouched by inflation and economic manipulation oai_citation:5,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.

Minimalism and Letting Go

As an advocate for minimalism, I believe in the power of letting go. The more you hold onto things—whether material possessions or outdated beliefs—the more cluttered your life becomes. Spartan frugality, which I often talk about, isn’t just about saving money. It’s about freeing your mind from the noise and distractions of the past oai_citation:4,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM oai_citation:3,Spartan Economics – ERIC KIM. The same goes for outdated ideas. The longer we hold onto systems that no longer serve us, the more we stagnate.

This resistance to letting things die is why so many people feel trapped by materialism. They fill their lives with objects and distractions, fearing that without them, they will be empty. But what they don’t realize is that freedom comes when we allow the old to die. In my own life, I’ve found that simplicity—both in material terms and in the way I approach the world—allows me to focus on what truly matters: freedom and creative expression.

Innovation Requires Death

It’s ironic that many people celebrate innovation but refuse to acknowledge that it requires the death of the old. For something new to take root, the old must wither away. This is the natural order of things, both in life and in business. Yet, we resist this process. We want newness without sacrifice. We want progress without losing what came before. This is why companies continue to pour money into outdated technologies and why governments cling to policies that no longer make sense in a modern world.

The refusal to let old things die is why we see industries stagnate. We want disruption in theory, but in practice, we fear the consequences. Companies that innovate, like those in the crypto world or in cutting-edge technologies, often face resistance not because their ideas are flawed, but because the system they are trying to replace has grown too comfortable oai_citation:2,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,Eric Kim Bitcoin Strategy – ERIC KIM.

Conclusion: Embracing the Cycle of Life and Death

In the end, we must come to terms with the cyclical nature of life. Death is not an end, but a necessary precursor to growth. We refuse to let old things die because we fear that their death means the end of something valuable. But what we fail to see is that their death creates space for something new, something better. Just as winter gives way to spring, the end of one thing paves the way for the birth of something else.

In my philosophy, whether applied to photography, investing, or life in general, I’ve come to realize that the most important thing we can do is to let go. Let go of outdated beliefs, unnecessary possessions, and fear-driven attachments to the past. Only then can we truly embrace the future and all the possibilities it holds. Live light, live free, and let the old things die.

—Eric Kim

Ignore the opinions of others

Multi modal training, battle training, war training 

Here are some notable quotes from Eric Kim that highlight his unconventional investing philosophy:

1. “Money is a tool to buy freedom.”
   For Kim, financial success is not just about accumulating wealth but about gaining the freedom to focus on meaningful experiences and creativity. His investments are aimed at securing time and mental space rather than material luxuries oai_citation:6,The Investor Mindset Sprint | Section oai_citation:5,Episode 43 – Spiritual Integration in Your Portfolio with Eric Kim — Faith Driven Investor.
2. “Bitcoin is digital gold.”
   Kim views Bitcoin as a long-term store of value, similar to gold, due to its scarcity. He advocates for investing a small portion of savings in Bitcoin, with a mindset that it could go to zero but also has the potential for substantial returns oai_citation:4,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.
3. “Spartan frugality is essential for building wealth.”
   Emphasizing minimalism, Kim advises cutting unnecessary expenses and focusing on long-term investments. He believes in living a simple life to maximize savings and investment opportunities oai_citation:3,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Spartan Economics – ERIC KIM.
4. “Never stop innovating, never stop creating.”
   Reflecting his broader life philosophy, this quote underscores Kim’s belief in constant growth and creativity—values he applies to both his personal life and investment strategies oai_citation:1,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.

These quotes showcase his focus on long-term value, simplicity, and the integration of personal philosophies into his investment choices.

Eric Kim, founder of BLACK EAGLE Capital, employs a unique investment strategy shaped by his minimalist lifestyle and focus on long-term financial independence. His approach combines elements of extreme frugality, risk tolerance, and future-oriented investments.

1. Frugality and Minimalism: Kim emphasizes cutting unnecessary expenses and redirecting savings into high-potential assets, such as Bitcoin. He advocates living simply, avoiding luxury spending, and focusing on long-term value creation. For Kim, this frugality is not about deprivation but about creating financial freedom.
2. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency: A central component of Kim’s strategy is investing in Bitcoin, which he views as “digital gold.” He believes in the long-term appreciation of Bitcoin due to its scarcity and growing institutional acceptance. Kim advises a long-term mindset, encouraging investors to hold Bitcoin for decades rather than seeking short-term gains. He also warns against the volatility of cryptocurrency and maintains a cautious stance on altcoins.
3. Long-Term Investment Mindset: Kim’s philosophy revolves around patience and thinking in decades, particularly for speculative investments like Bitcoin. He sees Bitcoin as a hedge against traditional financial systems and projects that its value will rise as adoption increases globally.
4. Investing for Freedom: For Kim, the goal of investing is to achieve financial independence, which he defines as the ability to pursue meaningful work and experiences without being tethered to financial obligations. His investments are designed to free up time and mental energy for creative pursuits.

This philosophy aligns with his broader goals of financial autonomy and purpose-driven living, reflecting his belief in using money as a tool for long-term freedom rather than immediate material gains.

Eric Kim’s Investing Philosophy.