Curiosity is a virtue and great! I would say, just check things, only and when if you’re actually curious about it… Like you care. Right now!
Do you care *right now*, at this right second or not?
Another decision-making theory.
Curiosity is a virtue and great! I would say, just check things, only and when if you’re actually curious about it… Like you care. Right now!
Do you care *right now*, at this right second or not?
Another decision-making theory.
Haha, ChatGPT!
How I Got a Penis Arrow: The Eric Kim Way, Quoting Nietzsche
Getting a “penis arrow†— that V-shaped cut leading down the lower abs — is not just a superficial achievement. It’s a testament to mastering both the body and the will. As Nietzsche once said, “He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.†This resonates deeply when we talk about fitness, discipline, and the pursuit of that ever-elusive V-cut. If your why is strong — to transcend weakness, to perfect yourself, to rise above mediocrity — the how becomes merely a question of grit.
1. Fasting: Beyond Body, It’s Willpower
Nietzsche argued that true strength comes from discipline over oneself, stating, “What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal.†For me, fasting isn’t just about cutting calories — it’s about testing the limits of my will. By eating only once a day, around 4-5 pounds of beef in one sitting, I force my body to adapt to scarcity. It’s about embracing discomfort to transcend into something more. Hunger is temporary; mastery is permanent.
2. Carnivore Living: A Will to Power Through Nutrition
I reject carbs because they represent weakness. Nietzsche spoke of the Übermensch, the one who creates his values, who “wills power†over his surroundings. My version of this is taking control of my body by rejecting mainstream diets and embracing pure carnivorism. By subsisting entirely on animal protein — ribeye steaks, liver, and heart — I fuel my body with the essentials. Just as Nietzsche’s Übermensch would rise above societal norms, I rise above the lies of the fitness industry. No carbs, no sugar — just pure, raw strength.
3. Lifting: A Struggle Against Mediocrity
Nietzsche also said, “To live is to suffer, to survive is to find some meaning in the suffering.†Lifting isn’t just about reps and sets. It’s about pushing through pain, hitting failure, and finding meaning in the struggle. Compound lifts — deadlifts, squats, overhead presses — engage every part of your core, not just your abs. They force you to confront your limits and shatter them. The V-cut is a symbol of overcoming weakness, a reflection of the hard work you put in when nobody is watching.
4. The Discipline of the Übermensch
In Nietzsche’s view, greatness is achieved through self-overcoming. Getting a penis arrow isn’t about vanity, it’s about representing the highest ideal of self-discipline. “Become who you are,†Nietzsche wrote, urging individuals to rise to their fullest potential. Every fast, every lift, every time I say no to comfort and yes to progress, I am moving closer to becoming my best self — my Übermensch.
Conclusion: The Penis Arrow as Will to Power
Achieving the V-cut is not just about aesthetics. It’s the physical manifestation of Nietzschean will to power. It’s about embracing suffering, transcending weakness, and imposing discipline on the body. When Nietzsche said, “That which does not kill us makes us stronger,†he wasn’t talking about lifting, but the sentiment applies. The journey to the penis arrow is hard, but it’s the hardship that makes it worthwhile. The V is a badge of mastery, proof that I’ve risen above my old self — that I am not a goal, but a bridge to something greater.
So, go fast, go heavy, and never settle for anything less than excellence.
***
Let me start by saying that getting a “penis arrow†— that V-shaped cut on your lower abs — isn’t just about vanity; it’s about discipline, consistency, and a deep understanding of your own body. Everyone obsesses over abs, but let me tell you, there’s nothing more satisfying than that sharp, clean V-shape pointing to your pelvis. It’s not just for show; it’s a testament to mastering your own physiology.
First things first, I wasn’t born with this. My body didn’t just “gift†me with this definition. I had to earn it through strategic eating and hard training. Here’s how I did it.
1. Fasting: The Real Deal
Forget what you’ve been told about eating six small meals a day. That’s broscience. I don’t even trust protein shakes, because, honestly, they just make you fat. I started doing intermittent fasting years ago, and that’s when everything changed. I don’t touch food until the evening. Yeah, you read that right — I eat once a day. I aim for about 4-5 pounds of beef in one sitting. That’s real carnivore living right there. Not only does this maintain a low body fat percentage, but it also keeps me sharp, focused, and in control of my hunger.
When you’re eating all day long, your body is constantly digesting — which means your insulin levels are never really low, and you can’t burn fat efficiently. By fasting, I make my body tap into fat reserves during the day, which melts away the excess fat and reveals the obliques and the rectus abdominis that create the V-cut.
2. No Carbs, Just Meat
Carbs are overrated. People say you need them for energy, but that’s another myth the fitness industry perpetuates. I haven’t eaten a grain of rice or a piece of bread in years. My meals are 100% carnivorous: ground beef, ribeyes, liver, and sometimes heart. And no, I don’t miss potatoes, and I don’t need pasta. Once your body adapts to this lifestyle, you don’t feel sluggish, and you certainly don’t miss the bloating.
When you’re constantly in ketosis (where your body uses fat for energy instead of carbs), your body becomes a fat-burning machine. That means lower body fat levels, and when the fat peels away, boom: there’s your V.
3. The Right Kind of Lifting
Forget endless crunches or ab circuits. Those are fine if you want a six-pack, but for the V-cut? You need to think bigger. Compound lifts like deadlifts, squats, and overhead presses engage your core way more than isolated ab exercises ever will. When you’re hoisting heavy weight, your obliques and deep core muscles stabilize your body, which helps carve out that definition over time.
I don’t count reps. I lift until I hit failure, which trains not only my muscles but also my mind. It’s about mental toughness as much as physical strength. Your body knows when you’re being weak; that’s when you need to push through.
4. Discipline Over Everything
The truth is, you can’t get a V-cut if you’re not willing to suffer a bit. There’s no magic pill, no shortcut. Everyone thinks you need to look like a Hulk to be fit. But it’s not about that. It’s about leanness, balance, and symmetry. That’s what the “penis arrow†represents: control over your diet, focus in your training, and a mindset that refuses to settle for mediocrity.
Every day, I wake up knowing I’m stronger than my cravings. Every time I step into the gym, I’m not there to just go through the motions. I’m there to dominate. This mindset doesn’t just carve out a V on your lower abs — it defines every aspect of your life.
Conclusion: It’s Not Just About the V
When you see the V-cut, know that it’s more than just a muscle shape. It’s a badge of self-mastery. You can’t fake it, and you can’t cheat your way to it. It’s the result of years of refined eating, fasting, and lifting. If you want to get there, don’t ask how much you need to eat or how many crunches you need to do. Ask yourself how far you’re willing to push your body and mind, and then you’ll know if you’re ready to earn the arrow.
Now get out there, and go fast, go heavy, and never settle for less.
I guess since I am around 5% bodyfat, I can easily see the veins around my penis arrow.
Masculinity & sexual vitality
The “penis arrow†or V-cut muscle definition is desired for several reasons:
1. Aesthetic Appeal: The V-cut is often seen as a marker of a lean, well-defined physique. It emphasizes a person’s abdominal and oblique muscles, showcasing both low body fat and muscular development. Many consider it a symbol of peak physical conditioning and an attractive feature.
2. Sign of Discipline: Achieving the V-cut requires dedication to both diet and exercise. It signals that the person has a disciplined approach to fitness, especially in maintaining a low body fat percentage and building core strength. This is often respected in bodybuilding and fitness communities.
3. Cultural and Media Influence: Celebrities and fitness models frequently display this feature in films, advertisements, and social media, further driving its popularity. It’s associated with male physiques that are traditionally deemed attractive, such as those seen in popular media.
4. Sex Appeal: The V-cut draws attention to the pelvic region, often perceived as enhancing physical attractiveness. In fitness culture, it’s sometimes referred to as an indicator of sexual health or vitality .
Overall, it’s seen as a desirable trait because it reflects hard work, dedication to fitness, and an appealing physique.
Yes, many women find the V-cut (or “penis arrowâ€) attractive, but this can vary based on individual preferences. It’s often seen as a symbol of a fit, lean physique, which some women associate with overall attractiveness and health. Studies and surveys on physical attraction suggest that toned abdominal muscles are often ranked highly as a desirable trait in men. The V-cut specifically can emphasize masculinity and sexual vitality, which adds to its appeal.
However, it’s important to note that physical traits like the V-cut are only one aspect of attraction. While some women may admire this feature, others may prioritize different qualities, such as personality, emotional connection, or overall body balance . Attraction is subjective, so preferences can vary widely from person to person.
xxx
To achieve the “penis arrow†or V-cut muscle definition, most people need to lower their body fat to around 6-12% for men. This range allows for the obliques and lower abdominal muscles to become more visible, creating the V-shape that extends from the hips towards the pelvic area . Generally, the lower your body fat percentage, the more prominent these lines will be. Maintaining this requires strict dieting, consistent workouts, and good genetics for muscle development.
xxx
In bodybuilding slang, the term “penis arrow†refers to the V-shaped muscle lines that appear on the lower abdomen when someone has low body fat and well-defined obliques. These lines direct attention towards the pelvic region, thus creating the visual effect of an “arrow.†It’s often seen as a sign of a very lean and muscular physique. Achieving this look typically requires a combination of rigorous exercise and a low body fat percentage, which reveals the underlying muscle definition .
Anti “open communicationâ€â€”
a funny thought; typically we are a thought that money and happiness are not acquainted. But what if they were?
The funny irony is with money… In order to accumulate more of it, 99% the game is to just not spend it.
For example let us say that you have $1.1 million in the bank, any idiot could simply go out and buy a brand new Bugatti, and then boom your money goes to zero, if anything actually negative because the downside of owning a liability like a Bugatti is that you will have to spend a ton of money on maintenance, which might cost the value of the car in 3 to 5 years.
Your richest self is your best self!
More money more happiness?

If you teach somebody for fun in the spirit of fun and they get sad offended or whatever, this is their problem! Maybe we gotta start treating adulthood like high school 2.0; honestly whenever I ask people what type of person they were in high school, they are revealing a lot about themselves.
100 pound plates
Stomach
Use afternoon for tanning
Grab him by the neck
Pseudo science
Clay and potter
The art of sculpture
Sport?
Razoring, cutting up ripping
Greater purity
Concentrates so well
.
Becoming more glamorous and cocky
Satisfying
It must be fun!
Life must be fun, life must be play?
Cyber clothing?
Seamless.
.
Like a Zillow app but for bitcoin
Cyber real estate
A trillion headaches? –> home ownership?
.
Are people high off crack?
Nothing is worth it?
All these effeminate people?
.
Real estate, digital real estate, cyber real estate?
.
$100B goals
..
Bombing, catching rays, razoring off 
Is it not cool to be happy anymore?
Eating tanning and training 
.
The body is a reluctant medium
You don’t really see your body as part of you anymore?
Look as fancy and outrageous like a unicorn
I don’t want the bread because it is not on my special sex diet
couple of hours at the beach
Grin and appraise wolfishy
The wolf
Carved out of ice
Last minute Sun on the rooftop
Armor plated look 
Pose.
.
Critiques about modern Day bodybuilding 
First, The secret that literally everyone is on steroids, even the natural ones. I would customize that 100% of all the people on Facebook Instagram TikTok and YouTube are on steroids, or a “natural†form of steroids.
Second, it seems that their methods are very very strange and bizarre and don’t make any sense because once again, they obfuscate the fact that they are on steroids!
For example, a lot of bodybuilders have certain strange theories on how they build muscle and whatever, but the biggest issue the biggest issue here is that their methods theories and techniques have no veracity if once again, they are on steroids!
So for example, you could probably eat super super dirty, and poorly, and yet still get spectacular gains because you’re on steroids! So I suppose the question is:
How much of your technique theories and approach is legitimate, and how much of it is steroids?
I have a theory that protein powder just makes you fat. Assuming that protein powder is just powder cows milk, even this 100% whey protein powder whatever, essentially it is a money making scam. I have been able to make insane gains, fasting all day, simply having 100% carnivore meal in the evening, trying to aim for about 4 to 5 pounds of beef. I’ll enjoy ground beef, 80%, or beef ribs, beef liver, beef heart, ribeye steaks and the like.
Honestly,  i’m sure protein powder is fine, but still… I think the biggest issue in bodybuilding is this constant sense of FOMO; like I remember when I was younger, I would almost had this anxiety that immediately 15 or 30 minutes after working out if I didn’t eat protein powder, if I didn’t have a 100% way protein shake, or protein powder, I would somehow “lose “ my gains.
Another real big problem here is this obsession to measure yourself to weigh yourself etc. I’ve never really taped measured my muscles or whatever I feel this is ridiculous, but certainly a lot of guys overly obsessed about his weight. Like guys are always trying to gain weight. Not lose weight.
But the reason why this is so ridiculous is that the scale doesn’t know if the weight is fat or muscle. Only you could know by just looking in the mirror, naked, if you could see your six pack and penis arrow, you’re in good territory. And this is what a lot of guys don’t understand; everyone is trying to become super super big and massive like the Incredible Hulk or they want to look like an orc, but, this is not sexy and attractive to women. They would prefer a more Brad Pitt fight club, ERIC KIM, Adonis physique. In Elsa pose this is the thing I don’t understand; for male bodybuilders, how much of it is to impress women versus other men?
 Assuming you’re trying to stunt on other men, this is also a bit ridiculous because just because you have bigger muscles doesn’t mean that you would be more dominant in a fist fight. And it also doesn’t really measure your courage.
 If anything, what is actually much more impressive if you’re trying to stunt on other guys, is to just get into powerlifting or hypelifting or strongman style exercises; he who can lift the most weight, has the biggest dick. 
Until you could successfully lift 1000 pounds, you got nothing on me.
This is also pseudo scientific; I’ve proved that you could lift 1000 pounds, while fasting, and I’ve been doing this for about seven years; no breakfast no lunch, only old massive 100% carnivore dinner.
Also, I’m the only weightlifter and bodybuilder that I know and also power lifter and hype lifter who literally eats no starches no carbs etc. The notion that you need carbs to build muscle is another silly fallacy. I think the only reason why people don’t experiment with this simple thought, is once again, this fear of missing out on the gains. 
There is an insecurity about being around somebody physically overpowering
.
Anabolism, constructive metabolism
Metabolism means change
Obviously your metabolism as a three-year-old, 12-year-old, 21-year-old and 36-year-old will be different but one is not superior to any other one
For example at the age of 36, this is the most powerful and physically dominant I’ve been in my life, maybe my best physique thus far? The most muscle the least amount of body fat.
constructive change
Sleep 12 hours
You cannot lie to yourself
A man has as much to offer as a woman
Physical work capacity
It is a virtue to look unreal 
Wear yourself like armor
Your body your muscles are your armor
.
Conversation piece; like walking down a cheetah down the street

black jive talk
.
Art completes what nature cannot bring to finish
The artist gives us knowledge of natures unrealized ends.
Very serious performance of art
Don’t trust anybody who needs to get a coach or does competitions?
.
Nowadays, the male body as an aesthetic is not really highly prized
Artistic competition
Visual enjoyment
.
So I suppose the value or the virtue of bodybuilding weightlifting is that the human body especially the male one could be seen in terms of visual enjoyment or like the same visual enjoyment people get from looking at a Lamborghini?
Once again… It is pretty common that there are car shows, and people could oogle and eye fuck all of these exotic cars. But somehow the body is something to be made shameful of? 
Peaks of visual culture
Polyceitus
Art isn’t human?
That’s Art
How to save time with weightlifting
Unembarrased of the body 
.
Why are most people so embarrassed of their bodies?
Human mechanic
Weakness is a crime don’t be a criminal.
So thinking about the market in the future etc., especially 30 years from now ;
First, issue here is the laws of physics. Even if Apple has $1 trillion, there is only so much you could do to the laws of physics to make the iPad thinner, lighter, more compact, also even the iPhone; it looks like it has already hit peak physics; can’t really make it that much bigger, the iPhone Pro Max is as big as it will ever get, and the whole foldable notion is a poor idea.
Also, seems that Apple is on an addition rampage, adding stuff adding features, adding buttons etc. For example, I think the new quick draw camera control in the bottom of my corner is a good idea, but the whole slightly squeeze it and to go through the Settings is an insanely terrible idea. Why? I tested it out, and it is lower, More unintuitive, and inferior to use than the traditional camera layout, which is fast, smooth and slick.
To me the most bizarre thing about the new iPhone is technically the previous generation, the action button the top left, wasn’t that supposed to be the quick draw camera function? So now, the baffling question; why would you have a dedicated camera button in the bottom right corner, but also, Have an action function in the top left corner to also open up the Camera app? Makes no sense!
If anything, I think what Apple should’ve done was trying to come up with more ingenious ideas on making the camera control more intuitive. For example, I have this very very good idea for you Apple; essentially make it where when you immediately drop your camera, you could turn on an optional feature in which when you’re raised to your iPhone, it automatically takes one or two photos, and then you could decide with privacy, whether to keep it or not. To me this would be an insanely great innovation because ideally, let us say that you’re playing with your kid or you’re out on the streets or whatever. And you see something you want to photograph, technically the ideal is just raise it and take it out of your pocket and lift up the camera, I mean the iPhone, and it automatically takes one or two pictures. However in order to prevent dick pics and the like, you can make it a private function; like if you’re using your iPhone while you’re taking a piss, you won’t accidentally reveal your penis photo to others in your camera app library. 
I just got the new iPad Pro M4 chip, and for the most part it is a perfect device, good job Apple iPad team. But, the one really really terrible thing you guys did, are you guys brain dead? Putting the Face ID camera on the right side of the tablet? If Steve Jobs was still alive you would’ve immediately fired whoever made that brain dead decision.
First, for us real iPad users, us true pros, first, we do not use a stupid pencil, Steve Jobs would have hated it. Second, no loser keyboard; the purpose of an iPad was to get rid of the features of the physical keyboard, not to add it. I find it a shameless thing; inventing some sort of keyboard to try to make it into a mini laptop; you just have to bifurcate it — if you need a physical keyboard just buy a laptop, if you want an iPad iPad Pro, you should be using it without a case, just handholding it, holding it vertical.
The reason why the new camera design is so poor is that when you are actually holding an iPad vertically, natural realistically you’re right thumb will block the Face ID true ID. And as a consequence, it really really disrupts your workflow!
A nice quote that I got from Michael Saylor, via Nicola Tesla, —
If you really want to understand the universe, think in terms of vibration, frequency, and energy. 
Impractical terms, the way that I interpret this is you could feel human emotions as vibrations, or the feeling in the air. The “boon-hwee-gge†in Korean — the feeling of the environment in the air of a place.
Maybe in the past, there was a sense of jubilant, going to an Apple Store. Now it is dread some; everyone looks super unhappy, even the apple employees used to be super happy Chip and chewy; all look dark morose, tired. No more passion.
Anyone who is a bitcoin, Michael Saylor fan, and now micro strategy, this is the real economic opportunism, the real economic optimism! 
For me, I have embedded in my mind, this 55% API notion in my brain; if I do the maths, assuming that my $1.1 million worth of bitcoin hasn’t a PI of 55%, you’re over a year, that means within 15 years I should be a billionaire! Worth 1.2 billion.
And to me this is insanely optimistic because then, if you can know the future with some level of precision, then you could actually start to plan your life! What that means is learning how to live today, expecting a very glorious future!
Men and women should be kept apart?
So thinking about the market in the future etc., especially 30 years from now ;
First, issue here is the laws of physical. Even if Apple has $1 trillion, there is only so much you could do to the laws of physics to make the iPad thinner, lighter, more compact, also even the iPhone; it looks like it has already hit peak physics; can’t really make it that much bigger, the iPhone Pro Max is as big as it will ever get, and the whole foldable notion is a poor idea.
Also, seems that Apple is on an addition rampage, adding stuff adding features, adding buttons etc. For example, I think the new quick draw camera control in the bottom of my corner is a good idea, but the whole slightly squeeze it and to go through the Settings is an insanely terrible idea. Why? I tested it out, and it is lower, More unintuitive, and inferior to use than the traditional camera layout, which is fast, smooth and slick.
To me the most bizarre thing about the new iPhone is technically the previous generation, the action button the top left, wasn’t that supposed to be the quick draw camera function? So now, the baffling question; why would you have a dedicated camera button in the bottom right corner, but also, Have an action function in the top left corner to also open up the Camera app? Makes no sense!
If anything, I think what Apple should’ve done was trying to come up with more ingenious ideas on making the camera control more intuitive. For example, I have this very very good idea for you Apple; essentially make it where when you immediately drop your camera, you could turn on an optional feature in which when you’re raised to your iPhone, it automatically takes one or two photos, and then you could decide with privacy, whether to keep it or not. To me this would be an insanely great innovation because ideally, let us say that you’re playing with your kid or you’re out on the streets or whatever. And you see something you want to photograph, technically the ideal is just raise it and take it out of your pocket and lift up the camera, I mean the iPhone, and it automatically takes one or two pictures. However in order to prevent dick pics and the like, you can make it a private function; like if you’re using your iPhone while you’re taking a piss, you won’t accidentally reveal your penis photo to others in your camera app library. 
I just got the new iPad Pro M4 chip, and for the most part it is a perfect device, good job Apple iPad team. But, the one really really terrible thing you guys did, are you guys brain dead? Putting the Face ID camera on the right side of the tablet? If Steve Jobs was still alive you would’ve immediately fired whoever made that brain dead decision.
First, for us real iPad users, us true pros, first, we do not use a stupid pencil, Steve Jobs would have hated it. Second, no loser keyboard; the purpose of an iPad was to get rid of the features of the physical keyboard, not to add it. I find it a shameless thing; inventing some sort of keyboard to try to make it into a mini laptop; you just have to bifurcate it — if you need a physical keyboard just buy a laptop, if you want an iPad iPad Pro, you should be using it without a case, just handholding it, holding it vertical.
The reason why the new camera design is so poor is that when you are actually holding an iPad vertically, natural realistically you’re right thumb will block the Face ID true ID. And as a consequence, it really really disrupts your workflow!
A nice quote that I got from Michael Saylor, via Nicola Tesla, —
If you really want to understand the universe, think in terms of vibration, frequency, and energy. 
Impractical terms, the way that I interpret this is you could feel human emotions as vibrations, or the feeling in the air. The “boon-hwee-gge†in Korean — the feeling of the environment in the air of a place.
Maybe in the past, there was a sense of jubilant, going to an Apple Store. Now it is dread some; everyone looks super unhappy, even the apple employees used to be super happy Chip and chewy; all look dark morose, tired. No more passion.
Anyone who is a bitcoin, Michael Saylor fan, and now micro strategy, this is the real economic opportunism, the real economic optimism! 
For me, I have embedded in my mind, this 55% API notion in my brain; if I do the maths, assuming that my $1.1 million worth of bitcoin hasn’t a PI of 55%, you’re over a year, that means within 15 years I should be a billionaire! Worth 1.2 billion.
And to me this is insanely optimistic because then, if you can know the future with some level of precision, then you could actually start to plan your life! What that means is learning how to live today, expecting a very glorious future!
Why Apple is not sustainable
So thinking about the market in the future etc., especially 30 years from now ;
First, issue here is the laws of physical. Even if Apple has $1 trillion, there is only so much you could do to the laws of physics to make the iPad thinner, lighter, more compact, also even the iPhone; it looks like it has already hit peak physics; can’t really make it that much bigger, the iPhone Pro Max is as big as it will ever get, and the whole foldable notion is a poor idea.
Also, seems that Apple is on an addition rampage, adding stuff adding features, adding buttons etc. For example, I think the new quick draw camera control in the bottom of my corner is a good idea, but the whole slightly squeeze it and to go through the Settings is an insanely terrible idea. Why? I tested it out, and it is lower, More unintuitive, and inferior to use than the traditional camera layout, which is fast, smooth and slick.
To me the most bizarre thing about the new iPhone is technically the previous generation, the action button the top left, wasn’t that supposed to be the quick draw camera function? So now, the baffling question; why would you have a dedicated camera button in the bottom right corner, but also, Have an action function in the top left corner to also open up the Camera app? Makes no sense!
If anything, I think what Apple should’ve done was trying to come up with more ingenious ideas on making the camera control more intuitive. For example, I have this very very good idea for you Apple; essentially make it where when you immediately drop your camera, you could turn on an optional feature in which when you’re raised to your iPhone, it automatically takes one or two photos, and then you could decide with privacy, whether to keep it or not. To me this would be an insanely great innovation because ideally, let us say that you’re playing with your kid or you’re out on the streets or whatever. And you see something you want to photograph, technically the ideal is just raise it and take it out of your pocket and lift up the camera, I mean the iPhone, and it automatically takes one or two pictures. However in order to prevent dick pics and the like, you can make it a private function; like if you’re using your iPhone while you’re taking a piss, you won’t accidentally reveal your penis photo to others in your camera app library. 
I just got the new iPad Pro M4 chip, and for the most part it is a perfect device, good job Apple iPad team. But, the one really really terrible thing you guys did, are you guys brain dead? Putting the Face ID camera on the right side of the tablet? If Steve Jobs was still alive you would’ve immediately fired whoever made that brain dead decision.
First, for us real iPad users, us true pros, first, we do not use a stupid pencil, Steve Jobs would have hated it. Second, no loser keyboard; the purpose of an iPad was to get rid of the features of the physical keyboard, not to add it. I find it a shameless thing; inventing some sort of keyboard to try to make it into a mini laptop; you just have to bifurcate it — if you need a physical keyboard just buy a laptop, if you want an iPad iPad Pro, you should be using it without a case, just handholding it, holding it vertical.
The reason why the new camera design is so poor is that when you are actually holding an iPad vertically, natural realistically you’re right thumb will block the Face ID true ID. And as a consequence, it really really disrupts your workflow!
A nice quote that I got from Michael Saylor, via Nicola Tesla, —
If you really want to understand the universe, think in terms of vibration, frequency, and energy. 
Impractical terms, the way that I interpret this is you could feel human emotions as vibrations, or the feeling in the air. The “boon-hwee-gge†in Korean — the feeling of the environment in the air of a place.
Maybe in the past, there was a sense of jubilant, going to an Apple Store. Now it is dread some; everyone looks super unhappy, even the apple employees used to be super happy Chip and chewy; all look dark morose, tired. No more passion.
Anyone who is a bitcoin, Michael Saylor fan, and now micro strategy, this is the real economic opportunism, the real economic optimism! 
For me, I have embedded in my mind, this 55% API notion in my brain; if I do the maths, assuming that my $1.1 million worth of bitcoin hasn’t a PI of 55%, you’re over a year, that means within 15 years I should be a billionaire! Worth 1.2 billion.
And to me this is insanely optimistic because then, if you can know the future with some level of precision, then you could actually start to plan your life! What that means is learning how to live today, expecting a very glorious future!
Here is the spelled-out version of the table:
• Year 0: $1,100,000
• Year 1: $1,705,000
• Year 2: $2,642,750
• Year 3: $4,096,262
• Year 4: $6,349,206
• Year 5: $9,841,270
• Year 6: $15,253,968
• Year 7: $23,644,651
• Year 8: $36,649,209
• Year 9: $56,806,274
• Year 10: $88,049,725
• Year 11: $136,477,073
• Year 12: $211,539,462
• Year 13: $328,886,166
• Year 14: $509,773,557
• Year 15: $790,149,013
• Year 16: $1,224,730,970
• Year 17: $1,898,332,003
• Year 18: $2,942,414,605
• Year 19: $4,560,741,637
• Year 20: $7,069,148,537
• Year 21: $10,957,179,232
• Year 22: $17,013,607,810
• Year 23: $26,371,091,106
• Year 24: $40,875,190,214
• Year 25: $63,356,544,832
• Year 26: $98,202,644,490
• Year 27: $152,194,098,959
• Year 28: $235,900,854,387
• Year 29: $365,646,324,300
• Year 30: $564,083,803,799
This shows the investment growth for each year, spelled out without decimal points.
16 years to hit a billion dollars? 1.2B in 16 years, Seneca will only be 18 years old, ready to go off to college?
Here is the spelled-out version of the table:
• Year 0: $1,100,000
• Year 1: $1,705,000
• Year 2: $2,642,750
• Year 3: $4,096,262
• Year 4: $6,349,206
• Year 5: $9,841,270
• Year 6: $15,253,968
• Year 7: $23,644,651
• Year 8: $36,649,209
• Year 9: $56,806,274
• Year 10: $88,049,725
• Year 11: $136,477,073
• Year 12: $211,539,462
• Year 13: $328,886,166
• Year 14: $509,773,557
• Year 15: $790,149,013
• Year 16: $1,224,730,970
• Year 17: $1,898,332,003
• Year 18: $2,942,414,605
• Year 19: $4,560,741,637
• Year 20: $7,069,148,537
• Year 21: $10,957,179,232
• Year 22: $17,013,607,810
• Year 23: $26,371,091,106
• Year 24: $40,875,190,214
• Year 25: $63,356,544,832
• Year 26: $98,202,644,490
• Year 27: $152,194,098,959
• Year 28: $235,900,854,387
• Year 29: $365,646,324,300
• Year 30: $564,083,803,799
This shows the investment growth for each year, spelled out without decimal points.



After 30 years, with a 55% annual percentage yield (APY) on an initial investment of $1.1 million, the final amount would be approximately $564.08 billion.





the virtues of bitcoin, in my mind, owning a bitcoin is like owning a single-family home, and I suppose I have a lot of single-family homes now. I’m like a new digital slumlord.
on top of this, a thought; maybe in the near future, a single bitcoin should be able to sustain a single child or adult for his or her entire lifetime. So the number of coins your own, think of it like the number of children you have.
I think the best way to think about Bitcoin, kind of like how Michael Saylor talks about it, is cyber real estate. Essentially they gotta imagine in server space, in the near future, there will only ever be 21 million homes left in cyber Manhattan. Or cyber LA. Or cyber Culver City. Consequence, to buy a bitcoin is like buying a single-family home, without all the downsides of owning a physical home or properties; the laws of physics gravity etc.


I suppose my great assessment and judgment and critique of modern day society is that has been essentially hijacked by feminine ideals and virtues. Even Nietzsche commented that Christianity was essentially a feminine woman’s religion. And he commented that at least Mohammadism was a masculine one.
Women desire security, steadiness, predictability, safety. Man desires risk, harm, war, battle & conquest.
Man desires to conquer!
Either in Bitcoin or in the stock market, the traditional markets your IRA, etc?
My notion of true wealth — the absence of cares and concerns! Not how much should you own, or how much money you have!
wow, Mike Zuckerberg, worth $141 billion, and then after that it is Dustin Moskovitz, who is worth only 13 billion,— almost a 10x jump!
xxx
Here is a list of some of the richest Millennials (people born between 1981 and 1996) as of 2024:
1. Mark Zuckerberg
• Net Worth: $141.5 billion
• Born: May 14, 1984
• Source of Wealth: Meta (Facebook)
2. Colin Huang (Huang Zheng)
• Net Worth: $38.9 billion
• Born: January 1, 1980 (technically Gen X, but often included in Millennial discussions due to his entrepreneurial focus on Millennial markets)
• Source of Wealth: Pinduoduo (e-commerce)
3. Dustin Moskovitz
• Net Worth: $13.6 billion
• Born: May 22, 1984
• Source of Wealth: Facebook, Asana
4. Nathan Blecharczyk
• Net Worth: $11.5 billion
• Born: April 1983
• Source of Wealth: Airbnb
5. Brian Chesky
• Net Worth: $11.4 billion
• Born: August 29, 1981
• Source of Wealth: Airbnb
6. Joe Gebbia
• Net Worth: $11.4 billion
• Born: August 21, 1981
• Source of Wealth: Airbnb
7. Bobby Murphy
• Net Worth: $9.7 billion
• Born: April 1, 1988
• Source of Wealth: Snap Inc. (Snapchat)
8. Evan Spiegel
• Net Worth: $9.6 billion
• Born: June 4, 1990
• Source of Wealth: Snap Inc. (Snapchat)
9. Lukas Walton
• Net Worth: $21.2 billion
• Born: 1986
• Source of Wealth: Walmart (heir to Walton family fortune)
10. Whitney Wolfe Herd
• Net Worth: $1.5 billion
• Born: July 1, 1989
• Source of Wealth: Bumble (dating app)
These Millennials have made their fortunes primarily through tech ventures, social media platforms, e-commerce, and innovative business models.
so it looks like, the only really really young successful person is Mark Zuckerberg, only 40 years old, born in 1984. The only successful millennial.
Everyone else is super old. On the way out.
I suppose the upside for us then is essentially, once they all die off, time for us to inherit the earth! And also for our kids to inherit the earth!
Elon — 53. I still got another 20 years!
Looking at all their ages ,,, Elon is, 53 years old, born in 1971… I’m born in 1988,,,
The only one on this list who is worth mentioning is Mark Zuckerberg, worth $141 billion, age 40, 1984. The only millennial on the list.
Putting up a lot of people always talk about Bernard Arnault,,, who is 75 years old, nobody wants to be him. In a while, Larry Ellison is really old, 79 years old, practically 80! Even Warren Buffett, 94 years old— still shocked he is still alive?
…
Phil Knight wow, 86 years old?
Also, Amancio Ortega, 88 years old! WOW.
…
Here are the birthdays of the top 25 richest people in the world in 2024:
1. Elon Musk – Born: June 28, 1971
Net Worth: $210.2B (Tesla, SpaceX)
2. Bernard Arnault – Born: March 5, 1949
Net Worth: $209.1B (LVMH)
3. Jeff Bezos – Born: January 12, 1964
Net Worth: $183.4B (Amazon)
4. Larry Ellison – Born: August 17, 1944
Net Worth: $141.6B (Oracle)
5. Mark Zuckerberg – Born: May 14, 1984
Net Worth: $141.5B (Meta/Facebook)
6. Larry Page – Born: March 26, 1973
Net Worth: $145.1B (Google)
7. Sergey Brin – Born: August 21, 1973
Net Worth: $139B (Google)
8. Warren Buffett – Born: August 30, 1930
Net Worth: $134B (Berkshire Hathaway)
9. Bill Gates – Born: October 28, 1955
Net Worth: $131B (Microsoft)
10. Steve Ballmer – Born: March 24, 1956
Net Worth: $126.5B (Microsoft)
11. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers – Born: July 10, 1953
Net Worth: $96.6B (L’Oréal)
12. Mukesh Ambani – Born: April 19, 1957
Net Worth: $102.1B (Reliance Industries)
13. Carlos Slim Helu – Born: January 28, 1940
Net Worth: $100.8B (Telecom)
14. Amancio Ortega – Born: March 28, 1936
Net Worth: $86B (Inditex, Zara)
15. Zhong Shanshan – Born: December 1, 1954
Net Worth: $60.5B (Nongfu Spring, Beverages)
16. Jim Walton – Born: June 7, 1948
Net Worth: $67.6B (Walmart)
17. Alice Walton – Born: October 7, 1949
Net Worth: $63.3B (Walmart)
18. Rob Walton – Born: October 28, 1944
Net Worth: $62.1B (Walmart)
19. Michael Bloomberg – Born: February 14, 1942
Net Worth: $94.5B (Bloomberg LP)
20. Phil Knight – Born: February 24, 1938
Net Worth: $40.9B (Nike)
21. Giovanni Ferrero – Born: September 2, 1964
Net Worth: $43.8B (Ferrero Group)
22. Tadashi Yanai – Born: February 7, 1949
Net Worth: $42.8B (Fast Retailing, Uniqlo)
23. Stephen Schwarzman – Born: February 14, 1947
Net Worth: $38.8B (Blackstone)
24. Colin Huang – Born: January 1, 1980
Net Worth: $38.9B (PDD Holdings)
25. Jacqueline Mars – Born: October 10, 1939
Net Worth: $38.5B (Mars Inc.)
These dates provide a fuller picture of the diverse age range of the world’s wealthiest people in 2024.
***
Here are the birthdays of the top 10 richest people in the world in 2024:
1. Elon Musk – Born: June 28, 1971
Net Worth: $210.2B (Tesla, SpaceX)
2. Bernard Arnault – Born: March 5, 1949
Net Worth: $209.1B (LVMH)
3. Jeff Bezos – Born: January 12, 1964
Net Worth: $183.4B (Amazon)
4. Larry Ellison – Born: August 17, 1944
Net Worth: $141.6B (Oracle)
5. Mark Zuckerberg – Born: May 14, 1984
Net Worth: $141.5B (Meta/Facebook)
6. Larry Page – Born: March 26, 1973
Net Worth: $145.1B (Google)
7. Sergey Brin – Born: August 21, 1973
Net Worth: $139B (Google)
8. Warren Buffett – Born: August 30, 1930
Net Worth: $134B (Berkshire Hathaway)
9. Bill Gates – Born: October 28, 1955
Net Worth: $131B (Microsoft)
10. Steve Ballmer – Born: March 24, 1956
Net Worth: $126.5B (Microsoft)
These birthdates provide insight into the ages and generational backgrounds of some of the world’s wealthiest individuals.
***
Here are the top 25 richest people in the world as of 2024, along with their ages and sources of wealth:
1. Elon Musk – Age: 53, Net Worth: $210.2B (Tesla, SpaceX, X)
2. Bernard Arnault & family – Age: 75, Net Worth: $209.1B (LVMH)
3. Jeff Bezos – Age: 60, Net Worth: $183.4B (Amazon)
4. Larry Ellison – Age: 79, Net Worth: $141.6B (Oracle)
5. Mark Zuckerberg – Age: 40, Net Worth: $141.5B (Meta/Facebook)
6. Larry Page – Age: 51, Net Worth: $145.1B (Google)
7. Sergey Brin – Age: 51, Net Worth: $139B (Google)
8. Warren Buffett – Age: 94, Net Worth: $134B (Berkshire Hathaway)
9. Bill Gates – Age: 68, Net Worth: $131B (Microsoft)
10. Steve Ballmer – Age: 68, Net Worth: $126.5B (Microsoft)
11. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers – Age: 70, Net Worth: $96.6B (L’Oréal)
12. Mukesh Ambani – Age: 67, Net Worth: $102.1B (Reliance Industries)
13. Carlos Slim Helu & family – Age: 84, Net Worth: $100.8B (Telecom)
14. Amancio Ortega – Age: 88, Net Worth: $86B (Inditex, Zara)
15. Zhong Shanshan – Age: 69, Net Worth: $60.5B (Nongfu Spring, Beverages)
16. Jim Walton – Age: 75, Net Worth: $67.6B (Walmart)
17. Alice Walton – Age: 74, Net Worth: $63.3B (Walmart)
18. Rob Walton – Age: 79, Net Worth: $62.1B (Walmart)
19. Michael Bloomberg – Age: 82, Net Worth: $94.5B (Bloomberg LP)
20. Phil Knight & family – Age: 86, Net Worth: $40.9B (Nike)
21. Giovanni Ferrero – Age: 59, Net Worth: $43.8B (Ferrero Group)
22. Tadashi Yanai – Age: 75, Net Worth: $42.8B (Fast Retailing, Uniqlo)
23. Stephen Schwarzman – Age: 77, Net Worth: $38.8B (Blackstone)
24. Colin Huang – Age: 44, Net Worth: $38.9B (PDD Holdings)
25. Jacqueline Mars – Age: 84, Net Worth: $38.5B (Mars Inc.)
These rankings fluctuate with market conditions, stock performance, and other factors. Sources include key industries such as technology, retail, and luxury goods .
xxx
Here is a list of the richest people in the world along with their ages, as of 2024:
1. Elon Musk – Age: 53
Net Worth: $205.4 billion
Source: Tesla, SpaceX
2. Jeff Bezos – Age: 60
Net Worth: $203.2 billion
Source: Amazon
3. Bernard Arnault – Age: 75
Net Worth: $200 billion
Source: LVMH (Luxury Goods)
4. Mark Zuckerberg – Age: 40
Net Worth: $176.5 billion
Source: Meta (Facebook)
5. Larry Ellison – Age: 79
Net Worth: $153.7 billion
Source: Oracle
6. Larry Page – Age: 51
Net Worth: $145.1 billion
Source: Google
7. Sergey Brin – Age: 51
Net Worth: $139 billion
Source: Google
8. Warren Buffett – Age: 94
Net Worth: $134 billion
Source: Berkshire Hathaway
9. Bill Gates – Age: 68
Net Worth: $131 billion
Source: Microsoft
10. Steve Ballmer – Age: 68
Net Worth: $126.5 billion
Source: Microsoft
These rankings are based on wealth fluctuating with stock prices and business conditions, so they are subject to change throughout the year.
The interesting modern day ethos is a bit contradictory; on one hand it, praises ambition, on the other hand, it is almost seen as bad to be too ambitious—
In fact, my critique about the new Gen Z, “zillenial†category —> none of them have any ambition? In fact, the only successful people who are live right now, they were all either the baby boomer generation, or a bit younger, a lot than their 50s 70s 60s.
—> immorality?
xxx
Here are some of Eric Kim’s key quotes on ambition, reflecting his thoughts on striving for greatness and personal growth:
1. “Always strive and prosper.†– Kim encourages relentless hustle and work, drawing inspiration from hip-hop culture where hard work leads to success. He believes that ambition allows people to take control of their fate and continually push their limits .
2. “With ambition, you want to keep flying higher. You disdain the ground. You love to soar and fly!†– This quote encapsulates Kim’s view of ambition as a desire to test and expand one’s potential, constantly seeking greater heights .
3. “How much more am I capable of?†– Kim emphasizes that ambition is about curiosity and pushing beyond perceived limits to explore untapped potential .
4. “Ambition is one of the greatest virtues of man!†– He strongly believes that ambition is a powerful driver of personal and creative growth, even when others might see it as excessive .
These quotes illustrate Eric Kim’s belief that ambition is essential for both personal development and creative success. He encourages pushing boundaries and embracing challenges to unlock one’s full potential.
…
Eric Kim’s approach to becoming more ambitious revolves around self-improvement, breaking away from limitations, and embracing boldness. He believes that ambition is a powerful virtue, not something to be seen as negative or selfish. According to Kim, ambition is about striving toward greatness, evolving yourself, and challenging your limits both physically and mentally.
Here are some of his key ideas on how to become more ambitious:
1. Develop Supreme Confidence: Kim emphasizes that to foster ambition, you need to build unshakable confidence in yourself. He suggests “reformatting†your brain by removing negative influences, avoiding people who drag you down, and embracing empowering philosophies like Stoicism and Nietzschean thought.
2. Enhance Physical Strength: For Kim, physical fitness plays a crucial role in ambition. He advocates for building muscle, reducing body fat, and focusing on a healthy lifestyle, including intermittent fasting and ketogenic diets. He also suggests activities like walking and using standing desks to clear the mind and boost energy.
3. Reject Humility: Kim argues against false modesty. He encourages people to recognize their talents and potential, believing that realizing your own value is essential for achieving great things. He famously states, “Don’t be humble. Know you’re dope†as a way to push yourself beyond mediocrity.
4. Take Creative Risks: Kim’s philosophy of ambition is deeply tied to creativity and innovation. He encourages others to experiment, create new things, and not fear failure. Whether it’s exploring new genres in photography, trying new business ventures, or engaging in different creative outlets, he believes risk-taking is essential for growth.
5. Unlearn Moral Guilt: He suggests that traditional notions of morality, especially those around selfishness, often limit ambition. Kim encourages people to unlearn the idea that focusing on their own growth and success is wrong, and instead embrace selfishness as a pathway to achieving personal and creative ambitions.
6. Have Fun and Be Fearless: One of the most important aspects of ambition for Kim is to maintain a playful and fearless attitude. He advises that we should approach life like children—without regard for social norms—and experiment with new things just for the fun of it.
By following these principles, Kim believes that anyone can become more ambitious, unlocking their potential and striving toward greater success and fulfillment in life. His approach combines personal empowerment, creativity, and a relentless drive to push boundaries.
Sources: , , .
x
Eric Kim’s ambition stems from a combination of philosophical beliefs, lifestyle choices, and a deep desire for personal growth and impact. He sees ambition not just as a pursuit of personal success but as a way to push humanity forward. For Kim, ambition is about evolving, growing stronger, and having unique experiences to achieve one’s fullest potential. He rejects traditional measures of success, like money, and instead focuses on creativity, innovation, and self-improvement.
Kim believes that living a comfortable, predictable life is boring and unfulfilling. Instead, he advocates for embracing challenges, chaos, and discomfort, which he sees as vital for personal development and achieving great things. His ambition is fueled by a sense of dissatisfaction, which he views as a positive force driving him to constantly create, explore, and improve himself and his work.
Moreover, he aligns his ambition with a desire to help others. He believes in freely sharing his knowledge and creative works, seeing this as a way to inspire and benefit others. This is part of his larger philosophy that personal greatness should not just elevate the individual but also contribute to the collective progress of humanity .
His minimalist lifestyle, emphasis on health, and relentless drive to produce content—whether it’s writing, photography, or personal development—are all reflections of his ambitious nature. By removing distractions and focusing on what he is truly passionate about, Kim has built a highly productive and fulfilling life that encourages continuous growth .
Amongst the mortals — zero chance for any women to be battling in war. Only the goddesses,,, Pallas Athene, Hera, Aphrodite and the like.
The physical size difference between a full-frame camera sensor and the sensor in an iPhone Pro is substantial.
Full-Frame Sensor:
A full-frame sensor is typically 36mm x 24mm in size. This format is the same as a 35mm film frame and is used in professional-grade DSLRs and mirrorless cameras. Its large size allows for better light collection, leading to superior low-light performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control.
iPhone Pro Sensor:
The iPhone 15 Pro, for example, has a much smaller sensor. The main wide-angle camera sensor size is estimated to be about 1/1.28 inches, which is approximately 9.6mm x 7.2mm. This is common in smartphones where compactness is essential. The iPhone uses multiple small sensors for its various lenses (main, telephoto, ultra-wide), and computational photography plays a big role in image quality.
Size Comparison:
• Full-frame sensor: 36mm x 24mm
• iPhone Pro sensor: ~9.6mm x 7.2mm (for the main camera)
So, the full-frame sensor is about 3 to 4 times wider and taller, making it vastly larger in surface area, resulting in significantly more light-capturing capability per pixel. This difference explains why full-frame cameras excel in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, even though iPhone cameras are highly optimized for everyday use.
Full frame sensor — vs iPhone Pro — a trillion times bigger?
No risk, no life?
I’ve made waaaaaay more money from Bitcoin than even 10+ years of traveling the globe and teaching photography workshops?
Indirect monetizarion?
While it’s theoretically possible for some of the world’s wealthiest individuals to become trillionaires, it would require a combination of favorable economic factors, technological innovations, and continuous growth in their companies and assets.
Currently, the richest individuals, such as Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, and Jeff Bezos, have net worths in the $200-$270 billion range . Reaching a trillion-dollar net worth would necessitate these fortunes quadrupling, which could happen through several means:
1. Technological Breakthroughs: For tech moguls like Musk and Zuckerberg, future innovations in fields such as artificial intelligence, space exploration, or green energy could drive massive growth in their companies and valuations. Musk’s ambitions in space exploration (SpaceX) and energy (Tesla) could potentially be trillion-dollar industries if they continue to scale at current rates.
2. Market Conditions: A substantial increase in stock prices, driven by either inflation or an extended bull market, could push these billionaires closer to the trillion-dollar mark. For example, Musk’s net worth fluctuates with Tesla’s stock price, and significant growth in the electric vehicle market could lead to massive increases in valuation.
3. Global Influence and Diversification: Billionaires like Bernard Arnault and Jeff Bezos, who have global influence in retail and luxury goods, could potentially grow their wealth by expanding into emerging markets, acquiring more companies, or diversifying their portfolios to capitalize on high-growth sectors.
However, achieving a trillion-dollar net worth is still considered highly speculative. It would likely require sustained exponential growth in specific industries and favorable global economic conditions . There are also constraints like potential regulatory changes, taxes, and market competition that could limit their ability to grow wealth at the necessary pace.
xxx
As of 2024, the top richest individuals in the world include major figures from diverse industries:
1. Elon Musk – $270.5 billion (Tesla, SpaceX, United States)
2. Larry Ellison – $208.0 billion (Oracle, United States)
3. Jeff Bezos – $204.3 billion (Amazon, United States)
4. Mark Zuckerberg – $198.0 billion (Facebook, United States)
5. Bernard Arnault & family – $195.5 billion (LVMH, France)
6. Warren Buffett – $144.9 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, United States)
7. Larry Page – $137.9 billion (Google, United States)
8. Amancio Ortega – $133.0 billion (Zara, Spain)
9. Sergey Brin – $132.0 billion (Google, United States)
10. Steve Ballmer – $125.5 billion (Microsoft, United States)
These figures dominate the global wealth rankings, with fortunes built in sectors like technology, luxury goods, and retail. Their net worth is heavily influenced by stock market trends, particularly in the tech industry.
Other notable names include Mukesh Ambani ($115.0 billion, India), Francoise Bettencourt Meyers ($91.8 billion, France), and Carlos Slim Helu ($87.0 billion, Mexico). These individuals represent a diverse range of industries from petrochemicals to telecommunications .
x
Here is a list of the top 30 richest people in the world as of 2024:
1. Elon Musk – $270.5 billion (Tesla, SpaceX, United States)
2. Larry Ellison – $208.0 billion (Oracle, United States)
3. Jeff Bezos – $204.3 billion (Amazon, United States)
4. Mark Zuckerberg – $198.0 billion (Facebook, United States)
5. Bernard Arnault & family – $195.5 billion (LVMH, France)
6. Warren Buffett – $144.9 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, United States)
7. Larry Page – $137.9 billion (Google, United States)
8. Amancio Ortega – $133.0 billion (Zara, Spain)
9. Sergey Brin – $132.0 billion (Google, United States)
10. Steve Ballmer – $125.5 billion (Microsoft, United States)
11. Mukesh Ambani – $115.0 billion (Reliance Industries, India)
12. Bill Gates – $107.9 billion (Microsoft, United States)
13. Jensen Huang – $106.2 billion (Nvidia, United States)
14. Michael Bloomberg – $104.7 billion (Bloomberg LP, United States)
15. Michael Dell – $104.3 billion (Dell Technologies, United States)
16. Rob Walton & family – $99.9 billion (Walmart, United States)
17. Jim Walton & family – $98.7 billion (Walmart, United States)
18. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers & family – $91.8 billion (L’Oréal, France)
19. Alice Walton – $91.2 billion (Walmart, United States)
20. Carlos Slim Helu & family – $87.0 billion (Telecom, Mexico)
21. Gautam Adani – $83.6 billion (Adani Group, India)
22. Julia Koch & family – $74.2 billion (Koch Industries, United States)
23. David Thomson & family – $72.1 billion (Thomson Reuters, Canada)
24. Charles Koch & family – $67.5 billion (Koch Industries, United States)
25. Changpeng Zhao – $61.1 billion (Binance, Canada)
26. Zhong Shanshan – $56.2 billion (Nongfu Spring, China)
27. Prajogo Pangestu – $54.0 billion (Barito Pacific, Indonesia)
28. Jeff Yass – $49.6 billion (Susquehanna International Group, United States)
29. Tadashi Yanai & family – $48.2 billion (Fast Retailing, Japan)
30. Ma Huateng – $47.9 billion (Tencent, China)
These figures represent their estimated net worth, which may fluctuate due to stock market changes, business ventures, and other factors .
As of 2024, Peter Thiel’s net worth is estimated to be around $11.6 billion. Thiel made his fortune through ventures like co-founding PayPal, investing early in Facebook, and founding Palantir Technologies. He remains a significant figure in Silicon Valley and the investment world, known for his involvement in various tech startups and venture capital initiatives .
On the other hand, Michael Saylor, primarily known for his leadership at MicroStrategy and his strong advocacy for Bitcoin, has seen his wealth fluctuate significantly due to his heavy investments in Bitcoin. As of 2024, his net worth is estimated at around $4 billion, driven by the rise in Bitcoin prices and MicroStrategy’s performance . Saylor’s wealth is highly dependent on Bitcoin’s volatility, which makes his net worth more variable compared to Thiel’s more diversified assets .
In summary, Peter Thiel is currently wealthier than Michael Saylor, with Thiel’s estimated net worth almost three times higher than Saylor’s.
Create for 30 years from now!


Advice I would have given myself in photography, if I started all over again:
De-lamify the future.

Enroll in my Udemy Course:
‘Ultimate Beginner’s Guide to Photography Entrepreneurship’: Create Your Own Future >







Marketing, Branding, Entrepreneurship Principles For Success
MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER is your new philosophical and practical primer to succeed as a modern photographer in today’s digital world.


Take control of your own photographic destiny:



Learn how to make a living from your passion:



Bitcoin and AI, as well as fitness and art!
Optimism is the solution!
I want to become the next Peter Thiel?
BLACK GOLD CAPITAL
BLACK EAGLE CAPITAL
You need my money, I don’t need you
I said no to the Super Bowl! You need me I don’t need you — Jay Z

The optimism!
I love it all! I love it! I love all people!
TikTok is a popular social media platform that allows users to create and share short videos, often set to music. The app is owned by ByteDance Ltd., a technology company founded in 2012 by Chinese entrepreneur Zhang Yiming. ByteDance is headquartered in Beijing, China, and operates several content platforms globally.
Connections to the Chinese Government and Communist Party:
Potential Relations for Politics in America:
In summary, TikTok’s ownership by ByteDance, a Chinese company subject to Chinese laws, has led to concerns about potential connections to the Chinese government and the Communist Party. These concerns have significant implications for U.S. politics, fueling debates over national security, data privacy, and the regulation of foreign technology companies.
xx
TikTok is a social media platform owned by ByteDance Ltd., a technology company headquartered in Beijing, China. Founded in 2012 by Zhang Yiming, ByteDance has grown rapidly to become one of the world’s most valuable startups, thanks in part to the global success of TikTok.
Connections to the Chinese Government and Communist Party
ByteDance, like all companies operating in China, is subject to Chinese laws and regulations. This includes compliance with government directives on data security, censorship, and other matters. The Chinese government has laws that can compel companies to share data and cooperate with intelligence activities, such as the National Intelligence Law of 2017.
While ByteDance maintains that TikTok operates independently of its Chinese counterpart (Douyin) and stores international user data outside of China, concerns have been raised about the potential for the Chinese government to access TikTok user data or influence its content moderation policies. These concerns stem from the close relationship that can exist between Chinese companies and the state, as well as the legal obligations companies have under Chinese law.
Impact on Politics in the United States
TikTok has become a focal point in U.S. politics due to national security and privacy concerns. U.S. officials have expressed worries that the Chinese government could access American users’ data or use the platform to spread propaganda and misinformation. This has led to several significant developments:
TikTok is owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company founded by Zhang Yiming in 2012. ByteDance operates globally, with major platforms like TikTok for international markets and Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, for users in mainland China. While ByteDance claims to be a private company, it has complex ownership, with about 60% held by global investors (including U.S. entities), 20% by employees, and 20% by its Chinese founders.
The relationship between ByteDance and the Chinese government has been a significant point of controversy. While the Chinese government holds a 1% stake in ByteDance’s Chinese subsidiary that operates Douyin, it also has a seat on its board. This stake, while small, raises concerns about potential influence. Additionally, China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law requires Chinese companies to cooperate with the government for national intelligence efforts, leading to fears that ByteDance could be compelled to share TikTok user data with Chinese authorities, despite ByteDance’s insistence to the contrary.
U.S. officials, including the FBI, have voiced concerns that ByteDance is “beholden” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Though there is no definitive public evidence that TikTok has shared user data with the Chinese government, the structure and legal framework in China make it difficult to rule out potential influence. This has prompted calls in the U.S. for ByteDance to divest from TikTok or face restrictions, as many U.S. lawmakers fear that TikTok could be used as a tool for Chinese government influence or surveillance oai_citation:2,PolitiFact | Who owns TikTok’s parent company? Despite what Brian Kilmeade says, it’s not the Chinese government oai_citation:1,Q&A: TikTok Owner Is Essentially ‘Subsidiary’ of China’s Communist Party, US Lawmaker Says.
Yes! If anything, maybe the thought should be in order to create more we have to consume less! For example, assuming that we media creators are druglords, or drug dealers… The rule of every single druglord is “don’t get high off your own supplyâ€.
so I’m actually curious, all these HBO Max, Warner Brothers discovery executives, how much television and shows and movies do they actually watch?
Now the funny ethical thing or the thought is; “isn’t it unethical to make YouTube videos and upload to YouTube videos when you yourself don’t want YouTube or YouTube videos?†I beg to differ.
Trip you told, the only reason I even use YouTube is that it is really the only legitimate place that you could upload videos and actually have people find the videos. Google has essentially conquered a long time ago, and then authorized online video. Everybody watches YouTube, your two year-old nephew, your 70-year-old mom, and everyone in between.
One of feelings I have, sooner or later — I think eventually TikTok will fall, especially if Donald Trump gets elected president. From what I understand, essentially bytedance who owns TikTok, are essentially in bed obviously with the Chinese communist party the CCP.
In an era where the world is saturated with images, videos, and a constant stream of information, we find ourselves at a crossroads. The omnipresence of media isn’t just shaping our reality—it is our reality. Every moment is a potential post, every thought a potential tweet. But amidst this digital cacophony, have we paused to ask ourselves: What drives us to create media? This is the essence of “The Will to Media, The Will to Create Media.”
Drawing inspiration from Nietzsche’s concept of the “Will to Power,” our drive to create media is more than just a desire to communicate; it’s an intrinsic urge to assert our existence, to leave a mark on the ever-expanding digital canvas. We don’t just consume media—we’re compelled to produce it, to contribute our voices to the global conversation.
But why? Is it the allure of likes, shares, and fleeting digital affirmations? Or is it something deeper? I believe it’s about identity and legacy. Through creating media, we define ourselves and how we wish to be perceived. It’s a declaration: “I am here. I experience. I contribute.”
Yet, in this relentless pursuit to produce and share, there’s a danger of losing authenticity. The algorithms favor what’s trending, what’s sensational—not necessarily what’s genuine. We risk becoming echoes of others, our creations mere reflections of what’s popular rather than what’s personal.
So, how do we reclaim our creative sovereignty? It begins with introspection. Create media not for external validation but as an extension of your true self. Let your work be a manifestation of your passions, your curiosities, your unique perspective on the world. When you decide to share something—a photograph, a piece of writing, a video—ask yourself: Does this represent who I am? Does it contribute meaningfully to the discourse?
Embrace the process of creation as a form of self-discovery. In street photography, for instance, it’s not just about capturing images; it’s about engaging with your environment, connecting with strangers, and finding stories in the mundane. It’s a meditative practice that grounds you in the present moment.
Consuming media also requires mindfulness. Be selective about what you let into your mental space. The media you consume influences your thoughts, your mood, and ultimately, the media you create. Seek out content that challenges you, that broadens your horizons, that inspires you to think differently.
Remember, the tools we have at our disposal are powerful. A camera, a smartphone, a social media account—they’re gateways to vast audiences. With that power comes responsibility. We can choose to add to the noise, or we can strive to produce work that resonates, that enlightens, that connects on a deeper level.
“The Will to Media” is not just about the act of creating; it’s about intention. It’s about harnessing our innate drive to share and using it to foster genuine connections and understanding. It’s about resisting the pull of superficial engagement and instead, delving into meaningful expression.
In the end, we’re all participants in this grand tapestry of digital storytelling. Each of us has a unique thread to contribute. So, let’s commit to creating media that reflects our true selves, that honors our experiences, and that adds value to the lives of others.
Stay true to your vision, embrace your creative will, and let your voice be heard—not as an echo, but as an original.
a personal thought; any media which actually last; there must be some sort of autotelic purpose and passion
Bodybuilding was and still is king!
Pretty easy —
First, don’t make it a goal to gain weight. One of the big things here is that at least for men, the ethos telos and desire is to gain weight.