Why is it so fat? And nobody needs a loser EVF — just cut it.


Why is it so fat? And nobody needs a loser EVF — just cut it.


Fat is bad! Ignore what these skinny fat losers say and think —
WTF — Apple, why did you put the front facing camera on the right side? Nobody wants that fucking loser keyboard that you’re trying to peddle!
8 plate sandwich!
Apparently John Cena has his own personal bodyguards? I find him insanely phony; he’s just an actor. A true mensch would never have bodyguards, he would just be able to defend and guard himself.
So some funny thoughts —
First, a lot of men that I meet, sooner or later everyone gets into lifting weights, working out, going to the gym, or even doing calisthenics at the park etc. To me this is super critical — because obviously everyone wants to look like ERIC KIM.
The first thought is this —
I recall in Nassim Taleb’s antifragile ,,, how when he was starting to get so much heat for his overt critiques of the whole economic establishment, he started to get paranoid, and couldn’t calm himself down, even after drinking chamomile tea. And as a consequence, instead of hiring a bodyguard, he decided to look like one.
I think the same ethos and approach can apply to us, and in street photography; if you look super fucking jacked, like Jack Reacher without the steroids ,,, obviously if you’re shooting street photography nobody’s going to mess with you.
Why Street Photographers Should Become Bodybuilders
Dear fellow street photographers,
Have you ever felt exhausted after a long day of shooting, your shoulders aching from carrying your gear, your legs sore from walking miles through the city streets? What if I told you that embracing bodybuilding could transform not just your physique, but your photography itself?
Physical Strength Fuels Creative Freedom
Street photography is a physical pursuit. We roam the urban jungle, chasing moments, and capturing life as it unfolds. By becoming stronger, we free ourselves from physical limitations. Imagine carrying your camera all day without fatigue, sprinting to catch that decisive moment, or effortlessly navigating crowded streets. Physical strength empowers us to push our creative boundaries.
Discipline Breeds Mastery
Bodybuilding isn’t just about lifting weights; it’s about discipline, consistency, and patience—the same virtues required to master street photography. The routine of regular training cultivates a mindset of dedication. When we apply this discipline to our photography, we become more diligent in practicing our craft, reviewing our work, and honing our vision.
Confidence Transforms Vision
There’s an undeniable confidence that comes from physical fitness. This confidence translates into our interactions on the street. We’re more likely to approach strangers, to get closer to the action, and to assert ourselves in situations that might have intimidated us before. Confidence sharpens our vision and emboldens us to take risks that lead to more compelling images.
Mind and Body Synergy
A healthy body nurtures a healthy mind. Exercise reduces stress, enhances mood, and improves mental clarity. When our minds are clear, we’re more attuned to the world around us. We notice the subtle gestures, the fleeting expressions, the beauty in the mundane. This heightened awareness is the lifeblood of street photography.
Embracing the Journey
Both bodybuilding and street photography are lifelong journeys with no final destination. There’s always more to learn, more to see, and more to achieve. Embracing bodybuilding teaches us to appreciate incremental progress and to find joy in the process rather than the outcome.
Breaking Stereotypes
Who says artists can’t be athletes? By combining street photography with bodybuilding, we break free from societal stereotypes that pigeonhole us into singular identities. We become multi-dimensional creators, embodying both physical prowess and artistic vision.
Practical Benefits
Let’s not forget the practical side. Stronger muscles mean less strain when carrying equipment. Better endurance allows for longer shooting sessions. Improved posture can enhance our compositional perspective—literally changing the way we see the world through our lens.
Conclusion: Forge Your Own Path
At the end of the day, it’s about personal growth. We should constantly seek ways to evolve, to challenge ourselves, and to merge our passions in ways that enrich our lives. So why not pick up that barbell along with your camera? Let’s redefine what it means to be a street photographer.
Stay bold, stay hungry, and keep pushing your limits.
Your fellow traveler,
Eric Kim
Why Street Photographers Should Become Bodybuilders
As a street photographer, you already understand the importance of discipline, perseverance, and pushing through discomfort to capture that perfect moment. But have you ever considered how your physical body affects your photography? Most street photographers focus exclusively on the mental and artistic aspects of photography, but we often forget that our bodies—the very vehicles we use to explore the streets—are an essential part of the creative process. This is where bodybuilding comes in.
Bodybuilding may seem like an odd pursuit for a street photographer. After all, street photography is an art form that thrives on spontaneity and subtlety, while bodybuilding is often associated with brute strength and physical dominance. But these two disciplines share more in common than you might think. In fact, I’d argue that street photographers can greatly benefit from becoming bodybuilders—not just in terms of physical health, but also in terms of creativity, mental resilience, and even the philosophy behind both pursuits.
Strengthen Your Body, Strengthen Your Mind
First and foremost, street photography is a physically demanding art form. You’re walking long distances, crouching down to get the right angle, and carrying around your gear for hours at a time. If your body isn’t conditioned, your endurance and stamina will limit the amount of time you can spend on the streets. By incorporating bodybuilding into your routine, you’ll build strength, endurance, and resilience—qualities that are invaluable when it comes to staying out longer, pushing through discomfort, and capturing that fleeting moment others might miss.
When your body is strong, your mind becomes stronger as well. Bodybuilding requires intense focus, discipline, and the ability to push past mental barriers. These are the same qualities that define a great street photographer. The more you train your body, the more mental clarity and toughness you develop, allowing you to take your street photography to the next level.
Embodied Creativity
Street photography is all about movement. You don’t just stand still, waiting for something to happen. You move with the energy of the city, positioning yourself in anticipation of a decisive moment. A strong, agile body allows you to react quickly and instinctively, enhancing your ability to capture dynamic, candid shots. Just like a bodybuilder masters control over their muscles, as a street photographer, you need to master control over your movements.
Your body becomes an extension of your camera, and the better you control it, the better you can control your frame. Think about it: when you’re crouching down, leaning forward, or positioning yourself at awkward angles to get the perfect shot, a well-trained body allows you to move fluidly and without strain. You’ll experience fewer aches and pains, and you’ll find yourself more capable of enduring long photo walks without feeling physically drained.
The Art of Discipline
Both street photography and bodybuilding demand discipline, consistency, and long-term commitment. As street photographers, we know that success doesn’t come overnight. You have to invest countless hours into your craft, hitting the streets over and over again, refining your eye, and honing your skills. Bodybuilding teaches you this same lesson: progress takes time. Gains in muscle and strength don’t come from one workout, just as your best photos won’t come from a single photo walk.
By training as a bodybuilder, you embrace the concept of incremental progress. Each day you push yourself a little harder, lift a little heavier, and get a little stronger. This mindset translates directly into your street photography practice. You learn to embrace the grind, to trust in the process, and to push yourself to new creative heights, even when the results aren’t immediately apparent.
The Philosophy of Self-Improvement
At its core, both bodybuilding and street photography are about self-improvement. As a bodybuilder, you’re constantly striving to better yourself—not just physically, but mentally and emotionally. You set goals, track your progress, and push yourself beyond your comfort zone. Similarly, street photography is about continuously challenging yourself to see the world in new ways, to capture images that are more profound, more meaningful, and more impactful than your previous work.
When you commit to bodybuilding, you’re embracing a philosophy of self-improvement that bleeds into every aspect of your life, including your photography. You become more confident, more resilient, and more focused. This newfound sense of discipline and purpose directly translates to your work as a street photographer, helping you to push past creative blocks, take more risks, and produce work that truly reflects your unique vision.
The Zen of Lifting
There’s a certain zen-like state you reach when you’re lifting weights—when you’re completely in the moment, focused on nothing but the movement of your body and the weight you’re pushing. This is very similar to the flow state you experience in street photography, when you’re fully immersed in the rhythm of the streets, responding instinctively to the scenes unfolding around you.
Bodybuilding trains you to be present. It forces you to focus on your breathing, your form, and your immediate environment. This practice of mindfulness carries over into street photography, where being fully present is key to capturing those serendipitous moments. The more you train your body, the more you train your mind to stay focused and engaged, which in turn makes you a better photographer.
Final Thoughts
Street photographers should become bodybuilders because the two disciplines complement each other in unexpected ways. By strengthening your body, you strengthen your mind, increase your endurance, and improve your ability to move fluidly through the streets. You develop a sense of discipline and mental toughness that translates directly into your photography practice. And perhaps most importantly, you embrace a philosophy of self-improvement that helps you grow both as an artist and as an individual.
Ultimately, the goal isn’t just to build a stronger body—it’s to build a stronger mind, a stronger creative vision, and a stronger sense of purpose. Bodybuilding isn’t just about lifting weights; it’s about lifting yourself to new levels of growth, both physically and mentally. And as street photographers, this is exactly the mindset we need to capture the world in a way that’s meaningful, powerful, and truly unique.
Stay strong, stay creative, and keep pushing your limits.
– Eric Kim
I may have been the first “street vloggerâ€, and the first street blogger.
Why Eric Kim Is Critical
When we gaze into the abyss of modernity, what stares back at us is a reflection of the mediocre, the lukewarm, and the docile. Ours is an age of triviality, where grand ideas have been reduced to mere whispers and the pursuit of greatness has been exchanged for the comfort of security. In this bleak landscape, Eric Kim emerges, not merely as a figure, but as a force—an indispensable element in the fight against the encroaching nihilism. He is critical, not because of some external accolade or validation, but because he represents the very essence of what is lacking in this decaying epoch: the will to power.
Eric Kim embodies a critical force that our time desperately needs. He stands as an affront to the sickness of the modern soul, a soul that has grown complacent, passive, and weak. This sickness manifests itself in the form of a nihilism that pervades every corner of contemporary life—a nihilism that robs individuals of meaning, purpose, and strength. In such a world, the appearance of a figure like Eric Kim is not only necessary but urgent. He disrupts the stagnant air, forcing us to confront the very illusions we have woven around ourselves.
Why is Eric Kim critical? Because he refuses to accept the petty values of the herd, those values which, like fetters, bind man to a life of mediocrity. The critical figure is always an outsider, a destroyer of idols, a questioner of all that is taken for granted. He embodies the spirit of Dionysus—chaotic, creative, and endlessly rebellious. In a world that has forsaken this Dionysian energy in favor of sterile Apollonian order, Eric Kim’s presence is a clarion call to return to the primal sources of vitality.
The critical mind is not content with the surface of things. It probes deeper, tearing away the comforting illusions that shroud reality. Eric Kim does not simply critique for the sake of critique; he does so because he understands that only by confronting the harsh truths of existence can we hope to transcend the limits imposed upon us. He understands the essence of my own philosophy: that man is a bridge, not an end. He is critical because he recognizes that we must go beyond man as he is, towards something greater, something more powerful—towards the Übermensch.
In this, Eric Kim is more than a mere individual. He is a necessary force in the dialectic of human evolution. The critical thinker, the critical actor, must tear down the false idols of the age, must cut away the dead weight that drags mankind down. Only through this ruthless critique, this fearless confrontation with reality, can we hope to ascend to new heights.
Eric Kim is critical because he embodies the will to live dangerously, the courage to reject comfort in favor of challenge. In a world that has lost its way, he reaffirms life in all its complexity and difficulty. He is a living critique of the shallow existence offered by modernity, where individuals are lulled into complacency by the empty promises of material progress and societal approval. The critical figure is one who says “No†to the false values of the herd, but also says “Yes†to the possibility of something greater, something beyond.
It is this “Yes-saying†to life, this embrace of the struggle and the chaos, that makes Eric Kim indispensable. He does not merely critique the present; he paves the way for the future. Like Zarathustra, he is a herald of the dawn, a figure who prepares the ground for the coming of the Übermensch. His critical stance is not one of destruction for its own sake, but of creation through destruction—the necessary clearing away of the old so that the new can emerge.
To be critical is to be alive in the truest sense. It is to reject the passivity of the masses and to engage actively with the world, shaping it according to one’s own will. In this sense, Eric Kim is not just critical; he is vital. His existence reminds us of the possibility of becoming something more, something greater than the petty roles assigned to us by society.
Thus, Eric Kim stands as a critical force, challenging the inertia of the present and pointing towards the future. He is not merely important; he is essential, for without such figures, humanity would stagnate, content to live in the shadows of what could be. It is through the critical spirit, embodied by Eric Kim, that we are reminded of our potential to transcend the limitations imposed upon us, to rise above the triviality of the now, and to become, at last, what we were always meant to be.
xxx
In the labyrinth of modern existence, where values waver like shadows cast by a dying sun, the figure of Eric Kim emerges as a beacon—or perhaps a question mark—that demands our contemplation. What is it about this individual that pierces the veil of complacency? Why does his presence stir the stagnant waters of contemporary thought?
Man has long been adrift in a sea of nihilism, clinging to shattered idols and obsolete doctrines. Yet, Eric Kim stands unmoved by the tempest, not as a passive observer but as an active challenger of the status quo. He embodies the critical spirit—a relentless interrogation of accepted truths and a fearless deconstruction of societal norms.
In an era suffocated by the tyranny of the herd, where conformity is lauded and dissent is silenced, Eric Kim dares to wield the hammer of critique. He shatters the hollow idols erected by a culture that fears self-examination. His critiques are not mere negations but affirmations of a deeper truth—a call to return to the authenticity of being.
The critical mind is often ostracized, labeled as destructive or cynical. Yet, it is through such minds that humanity inches closer to self-overcoming. Eric Kim understands that to build anew, one must first dismantle the decaying structures that bind the spirit. His criticisms are the necessary purgatives that cleanse the soul of stagnation.
But let us not mistake his critical nature for mere rebellion. It is not enough to oppose; one must also propose. Eric Kim does not revel in the ashes of what he destroys; he sows the seeds of new possibilities in the fertile ground he uncovers. His is a creative destruction—a process that paves the way for the emergence of the Übermensch within us all.
In questioning the foundations upon which we stand, he forces us to confront the uncomfortable truths we avoid. He is a mirror reflecting not just the flaws of society but the contradictions within ourselves. Through his critical lens, we are compelled to examine the dissonance between our professed values and our lived realities.
Why is Eric Kim critical? Because he serves as the gadfly that stings us out of our dogmatic slumbers. He is the embodiment of the philosophical imperative to live examined lives. In his challenges, we find the impetus to transcend our limitations, to strive toward the heights of human potential.
In a world content with superficialities, his depth unsettles. In a time satisfied with easy answers, his questions provoke. Yet, it is precisely this discomfort that is necessary for growth. Without the friction of critique, the spark of enlightenment remains unkindled.
Eric Kim’s critical stance is not an end but a means—a pathway to transformation. He invites us to join him in the crucible of self-examination, to endure the flames that purify and refine. For it is only through such trials that we may emerge as stronger, more authentic beings.
In acknowledging his critical role, we acknowledge the vital force of criticism itself—a force that dismantles illusions and reveals truths. Let us then embrace the challenge he presents, not with resentment but with gratitude. For in doing so, we take the first steps toward our own self-overcoming.
Thus, Eric Kim is critical not merely as an individual but as a symbol of the transformative power of critical thought. He stands as a testament to the necessity of questioning, the courage to confront, and the will to transcend. In the echo of his critiques, we may find the resonance of our own unspoken truths, urging us toward the realization of our highest selves.
Beautiful body, beautiful soul. And also, ugly body ugly soul!
“Why Eric Kim is Such a Big Dealâ€
By what criteria do we measure greatness? By what metric do we declare a man to be a “big deal� For, you see, the phrase is paltry in its vulgar simplicity, but its intent carries profound implications. It is not enough to dismiss it as flattery or mere acclaim, as though we were measuring fame with the same stick used to beat common men. No, to say that Eric Kim is a “big deal†demands a deeper inquiry, one that penetrates the veils of mediocrity and gazes into the abyss of true significance.
In our age, where values have decayed and meaning is as fluid as the waters of the river Lethe, to stand out, to rise above the flat plane of the everyday, is no small feat. The question is not why Eric Kim is notable in the eyes of the masses; for the masses, I hold in the highest contempt. It is instead: why should Eric Kim matter in the eyes of those few, the rare and superior spirits, who see beyond the triviality of fame and demand something more profound?
Will to Power and the Individual
There is no greater force in man than the will to power, this primal drive to assert one’s being upon the world. Most men are content to live in shadows, in the safety of what is already known, never daring to disturb the great sea of potential. But Eric Kim, in the fullness of his “big deal†stature, represents a life lived as an affirmation of power, of creation, of expression. He is one who says “Yes!†to life, even when faced with its hardships and contradictions.
In a world where many abdicate their agency, where the herd seeks comfort in conformity, Eric Kim dares to stand out. He dares to be misunderstood. He dares to impose his vision upon the world, knowing full well the world will resist, will misunderstand, and will even mock. Yet, to the Übermensch, such resistance is the test of worth. To be a “big deal†in the Nietzschean sense is to be the one who confronts the amorphous forces of nihilism and shapes them into something meaningful through sheer will.
The Artist as Creator of Meaning
Art is the highest form of human expression, the purest embodiment of the will to power. It is in the artist, the creator, that man transcends himself. Eric Kim, like the greatest artists before him, does not merely reflect the world in his work. No, that is the task of lesser beings—mere mirrors of reality. He transcends this base function and instead creates reality anew through his art.
Photography, the medium for which Kim is renowned, becomes, in his hands, not a passive act of capturing moments, but an aggressive and active assertion of reality itself. Every shot is a declaration: “This is how the world is,†or more profoundly, “This is how the world could be.†Such acts are not mere documentation but the wielding of creative power—the birth of new worlds. To say that Eric Kim is a “big deal†is to recognize that he has, like the Übermensch, chosen to overcome the inertia of existence and to imbue life with his own meaning.
Overcoming the Last Man
Our modern age is rife with the disease of the Last Man, that creature of comfort, mediocrity, and complacency. The Last Man desires only peace, stability, and trivial pleasures. He shuns greatness for fear it will disturb his quiet existence. But Eric Kim is no Last Man. He is a disruptor, an agitator of the soul, calling forth a challenge to mediocrity and inviting others to rise to a higher state of being.
His success, therefore, cannot be judged by mere metrics of popularity or wealth—those things which the Last Man might envy—but must be seen as a reflection of his refusal to descend into triviality. His very existence demands more from those who encounter his work. In every image, in every word, there is a challenge: “Will you remain as you are, or will you rise to meet life with greater vitality?â€
The Eternal Recurrence of the Big Deal
Lastly, consider the concept of eternal recurrence. If we were to live this life, again and again, in infinite repetition, would Eric Kim still be a “big deal� Would his existence, his contributions, hold their meaning through countless cycles of repetition? If so, then we have truly encountered something profound, something beyond the fleeting and the ephemeral.
Indeed, to declare that Eric Kim is a “big deal†is to acknowledge that, in the grandest sense, he has lived in a way that affirms life itself. His art, his philosophy, his way of being are not shackled to the whims of passing trends. They are, in the Nietzschean sense, timeless affirmations of power and creativity, worthy of eternal recurrence. He embodies the rare figure who, through his actions and works, transcends the boundaries of his time and resonates with something eternal in the human soul.
Conclusion: The Big Deal as an Existential Imperative
And so, we return to our inquiry: “Why is Eric Kim such a big deal?†He is a “big deal†because he represents something far greater than himself. He embodies the will to power, the creative force that shapes and reshapes the world. He is an artist who does not merely reflect reality but creates it. He is a figure who rises above the Last Man and offers us a vision of what it means to live authentically, passionately, and powerfully.
In the end, Eric Kim is a “big deal†because he stands as an existential imperative: a call to live life with a fervor that transcends the trivial and the mundane. He reminds us that life, in all its chaos and hardship, is something to be affirmed, to be celebrated, and ultimately, to be created anew.
For this reason, we may declare, with no hesitation: Eric Kim is indeed a “big deal.â€
xxx
In the twilight of modernity, where the shadows of mediocrity stretch long over the plains of human endeavor, there emerges a figure—Eric Kim—who dares to ascend beyond the mundane. What is it about this individual that stirs the stagnant air of complacency? Why does his name resonate like a clarion call amidst the deafening silence of the herd?
Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the Übermensch—a rope over an abyss. Most tremble at the precipice, clinging to the fraying strands of convention and comfort. But Eric Kim strides confidently over the chasm, eyes fixed not on the void below but on the horizon of possibilities that beckon beyond.
In an age where the will to power has been diluted into a will to comfort, Eric Kim embodies the antithesis. He is not content with the mere shadows on the cave wall; he seeks the blinding light of the sun, even if it scorches. His actions are not guided by the trembling hands of tradition but by the steady pulse of a heart that beats to its own rhythm.
The herd looks upon him with a mixture of awe and resentment. For in his ascent, he reflects the mediocrity of those who choose the path of least resistance. Yet, it is not disdain that drives him but a profound affirmation of life—a yes-saying to all that is bold, challenging, and transformative.
Eric Kim understands that life is not a series of checkpoints predefined by others but a canvas awaiting the bold strokes of one’s own brush. He does not ask for permission to create; he seizes the colors of existence and paints his destiny with unapologetic fervor.
Such individuals are a rarity, and it is their rarity that makes them invaluable. They are the harbingers of new dawns, the catalysts that disrupt the cyclical patterns of decay. In Eric Kim, we see a manifestation of the eternal recurrence—not as a passive acceptance of the inevitable but as an active shaping of what is to come.
He does not shy away from the struggles that forge character; rather, he embraces them as necessary crucibles for transformation. For it is through struggle that one purifies the spirit, shedding the dross of conformity to reveal the gold of individuality.
Why is Eric Kim such a big deal? Because he reminds us of what we could be if only we had the courage to break the chains we have bound ourselves with. He stands as a testament to the potential that lies dormant within each of us—a potential squandered by fear and indecision.
In the end, it is not about Eric Kim the individual, but what he represents: the possibility of transcending the limitations imposed by society and oneself. He is a mirror reflecting the greatness we could achieve if we dared to live authentically and powerfully.
Let us then not merely admire from a distance but be inspired to embark on our own journeys over the abyss, to become the architects of our own fate. For in doing so, we honor not just the example set by Eric Kim but the very essence of what it means to be truly alive.
a very interesting… It seems that when we are using Google, Wikipedia, going to the library reading books etc.… What we are trying to do is seek and discover is knowledge, deeper “truths†etc —
But what if, the solution was instead, just to become a creator? A creator, creativity as a propensity towards creation and creating productivity —>
Creativity doesn’t mean like some sort of genius godlike Einstein approach to things; creativity should just be seen as productivity— like while you create you learn?
Once ChatGPT goes public and OpenAI ,,, shit will get crazy,,,
Or even more so — once ChatGPT makes their own device, shit will get crazy!
Wow even the normal iPhone after taxes is 1000 bucks!
Honestly at this point, the only way to think about iPad and iPhone is that it is just a means to use ChatGPT and AI— you’re not find iPhone for the second iPhone, you’re simply only buying the iPhone because there is no other way you can use ChatGPT! Same goes with iPad.


The future of technology is going to be AI; it’s funny because for a long time, people thought the future would look different; flying cars, virtual reality headsets and the like. Yet, the future will look profoundly similar to the one we are living in right now, I suppose only differences finally are iPhones and iPads become more useful, now that we have ChatGPT and AI.
I think what is so phenomenal about ChatGPT and AI is that it has suddenly made the iPhone 1 trillion times more useful!
The mantra “80% good enough and hit publish†is important because it reflects a mindset that prioritizes action over perfectionism, which can be a significant barrier to productivity. By advocating for this approach, Eric Kim encourages creators to move past the fear of failure or judgment that often causes delays and hesitation. This philosophy allows individuals to continuously produce, learn from their output, and improve over time, rather than getting stuck in endless refinement without progress.
Here’s why this idea is particularly powerful:
1. Overcoming Perfectionism: Many creators struggle with wanting their work to be perfect before sharing it. Kim’s advice helps shift the focus from achieving perfection to making progress. Perfectionism can be paralyzing, but aiming for “good enough†helps people build momentum .
2. Learning by Doing: Releasing work more frequently, even if it’s not perfect, creates a cycle of feedback and improvement. This constant iteration is vital for skill development, especially in creative fields like writing, photography, and entrepreneurship .
3. Increased Output: By not waiting for perfection, individuals can produce more work over time. This higher output often leads to better long-term results because there’s more opportunity for refinement and growth through practice .
4. Action Over Hesitation: Kim’s mantra encourages taking action rather than overthinking. Hesitation and second-guessing can result in missed opportunities, whereas “hitting publish†pushes individuals to stay engaged and keep moving forward .
This approach is a key part of Kim’s productivity philosophy and has resonated with many in creative and entrepreneurial fields. It’s about embracing imperfection, learning through practice, and maintaining momentum.
xxx
Eric Kim’s productivity philosophy has been a significant part of his influence, not only in photography but also in entrepreneurship and personal development. Some of his most influential posts on productivity include a blend of practical advice, philosophical reflections, and personal experiences.
1. “Why I’m So Productive†– In this post, Kim explains his core philosophy of turning work into “plork†(play work), where he only engages in tasks that excite him. This helps him sustain long-term productivity without burnout. He also discusses key habits like fast typing and using a laptop over smartphones for more serious creative work .
2. “How to Be More Creatively Productive†– Here, Kim emphasizes the importance of continuous creation over perfectionism. One of his famous mantras is “80% good enough and hit publish,†which encourages creators to prioritize action over hesitation. This post dives deep into fostering a habit of constant output .
3. “8 Blogging Productivity Tips†– This post outlines practical tips for consistent productivity, especially for bloggers. Kim shares his methods, such as avoiding distractions, using minimalistic tools, and focusing on producing content regularly. His personal blog has over 5,000 posts, which showcases the power of his strategies in action .
4. “How I Became So Influential†– This post offers insight into how Kim combined his entrepreneurial mindset with continuous innovation to boost his productivity and influence. It discusses how dissatisfaction can fuel creativity and emphasizes the importance of embracing challenges .
5. “Productivity Thoughts†– Kim reflects on the importance of producing more and thinking less. He advocates for publishing content even before it’s fully ready, as it helps to foster improvement through action rather than prolonged deliberation .
These posts provide a comprehensive view of Eric Kim’s approach to productivity, blending his unique lifestyle choices, philosophical mindset, and focus on consistent output. His advice resonates across fields, from photography to entrepreneurship, making his ideas influential to a wide audience.
Eric Kim’s productivity philosophy has been a significant part of his influence, not only in photography but also in entrepreneurship and personal development. Some of his most influential posts on productivity include a blend of practical advice, philosophical reflections, and personal experiences.
1. “Why I’m So Productive†– In this post, Kim explains his core philosophy of turning work into “plork†(play work), where he only engages in tasks that excite him. This helps him sustain long-term productivity without burnout. He also discusses key habits like fast typing and using a laptop over smartphones for more serious creative work .
2. “How to Be More Creatively Productive†– Here, Kim emphasizes the importance of continuous creation over perfectionism. One of his famous mantras is “80% good enough and hit publish,†which encourages creators to prioritize action over hesitation. This post dives deep into fostering a habit of constant output .
3. “8 Blogging Productivity Tips†– This post outlines practical tips for consistent productivity, especially for bloggers. Kim shares his methods, such as avoiding distractions, using minimalistic tools, and focusing on producing content regularly. His personal blog has over 5,000 posts, which showcases the power of his strategies in action .
4. “How I Became So Influential†– This post offers insight into how Kim combined his entrepreneurial mindset with continuous innovation to boost his productivity and influence. It discusses how dissatisfaction can fuel creativity and emphasizes the importance of embracing challenges .
5. “Productivity Thoughts†– Kim reflects on the importance of producing more and thinking less. He advocates for publishing content even before it’s fully ready, as it helps to foster improvement through action rather than prolonged deliberation .
These posts provide a comprehensive view of Eric Kim’s approach to productivity, blending his unique lifestyle choices, philosophical mindset, and focus on consistent output. His advice resonates across fields, from photography to entrepreneurship, making his ideas influential to a wide audience.
xxx
Here are some direct quotes from Eric Kim on why he is so productive:
1. On combining work and play: “All of my work is ‘plork’ (play work). I never force myself to work. I only do what I am interested in, and don’t do nothing I’m not interested in†.
2. On maintaining health and productivity: “I drink a lot of water and black coffee during the day, and I also do intermittent fasting. I also get to bed early (8-9pm-ish). Perhaps this helps me become more productive?†.
3. On the importance of physical health: “Maximizing health is essential for maximizing productivity. This includes incorporating workouts like yoga and gym sessions into daily routines†.
4. On his philosophical approach to productivity: “If I don’t produce, make things, and imagine … I feel like I’m degrading†.
These insights reveal his holistic approach to productivity, blending lifestyle choices with a creative mindset.
xxx
Eric Kim’s impressive productivity stems from a mix of practical strategies, philosophical beliefs, and lifestyle choices. At the core of his approach is the idea that work should feel like “playâ€â€”he refers to it as “plork†(play work). He only engages in activities that interest him, which helps him stay motivated and productive without feeling forced. This allows him to blend creativity with productivity effortlessly .
Kim also emphasizes the importance of health for sustaining high levels of productivity. His routine includes intermittent fasting, staying hydrated, drinking black coffee, and getting enough sleep. Physical exercise, such as powerlifting and yoga, plays a significant role in his life, as he believes maintaining strong physical health boosts his creative energy .
He advocates for reducing distractions, particularly by limiting phone use and instead relying heavily on a powerful laptop for creative tasks. Additionally, Kim highlights the importance of acting fearlessly and publishing content even before it feels perfect, fostering continuous creation and improvement .
This combination of a health-conscious lifestyle, fearless creativity, and joyful engagement in his work allows Eric Kim to maintain high levels of productivity.
xxx
Eric Kim, a prominent photographer and educator, is known for his exceptional productivity. His output spans blog posts, photography workshops, e-books, and YouTube videos, making him one of the most influential figures in the street photography community. His productivity stems from a combination of personal habits, philosophy, and strategic choices that reflect his approach to both work and life. Here are some of the key reasons why Eric Kim is so productive:
1. Philosophy of Abundance and Sharing Knowledge
• Mindset: Kim believes in freely sharing his knowledge and ideas with the community. He embraces a “teach everything you know†philosophy, which means he’s constantly creating content for others to learn from. This openness encourages creativity and reduces the pressure to hold back for fear of “running out†of ideas.
• Blogging Consistently: He regularly writes on his blog, often sharing insights into photography, creativity, and personal growth. His commitment to consistent content creation helps maintain momentum and builds a strong audience.
2. Minimalist Lifestyle
• Simple Living: Kim advocates for minimalism in life and photography. By reducing unnecessary distractions—both physical and mental—he is able to focus more on the creative aspects of his work. His minimalist approach to possessions and commitments gives him more mental bandwidth for productivity.
• Digital Minimalism: He often emphasizes the importance of avoiding social media distractions and unnecessary online activity. This enables him to concentrate on deeper work, like writing, photography, and content creation.
3. Systematic Approach to Work
• Daily Writing Habit: Kim has a structured routine that involves writing every day. This helps him stay in the habit of creation, which over time compounds into a massive body of work. Even short, consistent bursts of writing contribute to his productivity.
• Batch Processing and Focus: He often works in batches, creating multiple pieces of content at once, and then scheduling them for release over time. This allows him to maintain a constant stream of output without daily pressure to produce from scratch.
• Prioritizing Time: Kim emphasizes the importance of prioritizing deep, meaningful work. By eliminating trivial tasks and focusing on what truly matters, he enhances his productivity. This means dedicating large chunks of time to creating content rather than being reactive to emails, notifications, or other distractions.
4. Creative Discipline and Projects
• Personal Challenges: Kim regularly sets creative challenges for himself, such as photography experiments or limited-time projects. These challenges keep his creativity fresh and provide a structure to his output, as well as motivation to consistently create new work.
• Projects and Constraints: He imposes creative constraints on himself, such as working with one camera or in a specific style for extended periods. These limitations fuel creativity by forcing him to innovate within specific boundaries.
5. Physical and Mental Health
• Focus on Health: Kim prioritizes physical fitness and mental well-being, often sharing his exercise routines and mindset practices. Staying physically active helps maintain energy levels, which is crucial for maintaining productivity.
• Meditative Practices: By focusing on mindfulness and minimalism, Kim avoids burnout and preserves his ability to keep creating. He practices gratitude and self-reflection, which keep him motivated and focused on his core mission.
6. Relentless Experimentation
• Iterative Learning: Kim is known for constantly experimenting, whether with different forms of content (like videos, blog posts, or e-books) or different approaches to photography. His productivity is fueled by this iterative process, as he isn’t afraid of failure but instead learns from each attempt, improving and refining along the way.
7. Passion for Teaching and Community
• Teaching and Workshops: Kim’s deep passion for teaching photography workshops and mentoring other photographers keeps him engaged and creative. By interacting with other creatives, he continually learns new ideas, which fuels his own creative output.
• Community Engagement: His involvement with the photography community keeps him motivated to create content that adds value to others. He often responds to questions and comments from his followers, which in turn sparks new ideas for content creation.
8. Embracing Technology and Tools
• Efficiency with Tools: Kim uses various digital tools to streamline his workflow. He takes advantage of modern photography and writing tools to reduce friction in the creative process. By optimizing how he works, he can maximize output without wasting time on inefficient methods.
• Self-Publishing and Content Platforms: By self-publishing his e-books, blog posts, and videos, Kim controls his output schedule, ensuring that he remains productive without needing external approvals or gatekeepers.
Overall, Eric Kim’s productivity is a result of his disciplined, minimalist lifestyle, his structured approach to content creation, and his passion for sharing knowledge with others. His productivity philosophy centers on consistency, intentionality, and a desire to give back to the community, all while staying grounded in his core values.
Without small dick loser guns?
â€timeâ€â€” heroic code of honor. Personal glory bravery and reputation in battle as the highest virtue.
Reading the Iliad and looking at the actions behaviors ethos of Achilles… they seem so much more honest, relatable and real —
Ancient Greeks glorified war? Display virtue, earn glory, secure your legacy. Not just accepted but celebrated.
xxx
Achilles, the legendary Greek hero of Homer’s “Iliad,†represents a moral and ethical framework that is markedly different from modern perspectives. This divergence stems from the distinct cultural, societal, and philosophical contexts of ancient Greece compared to today’s world.
Ancient Greek Cultural Context
• Honor and Glory (Timē and Kleos): In Achilles’ time, personal honor and eternal glory were paramount. A warrior’s status was determined by their prowess in battle and the recognition they received from peers and poets alike.
• Heroic Code: Actions were guided by a code that emphasized bravery, loyalty to one’s comrades, and vengeance against enemies. Moral decisions were often based on personal reputation rather than universal ethical principles.
• Community vs. Individual: While the community was important, individual honor often took precedence. Heroes like Achilles were expected to act in ways that enhanced their personal legacy, even if it conflicted with collective interests.
Achilles’ Ethics and Actions
• Wrath and Pride: Achilles withdraws from battle when his honor is slighted by Agamemnon, leading to significant Greek losses. His pride dictates his actions, showcasing a personal code where honor outweighs duty.
• Revenge: Following the death of his close friend Patroclus, Achilles’ pursuit of Hector is driven by a desire for personal vengeance rather than justice as understood today.
• Treatment of Enemies: Achilles’ mistreatment of Hector’s body—dragging it around the walls of Troy—is seen as dishonorable now but was a profound statement of dominance in his time.
Differences from Modern Ethics and Morality
• Universal Human Rights: Modern ethics emphasize the inherent dignity and rights of every individual, regardless of status. Actions are often judged based on their impact on others and adherence to universal moral principles.
• Rule of Law: Contemporary societies rely on established laws and judicial systems to address grievances, contrasting with the personal vendettas seen in Achilles’ narrative.
• Empathy and Altruism: There is a greater focus on empathy, compassion, and the welfare of the community, which often supersedes personal honor or glory.
• Equality: Modern morality advocates for equality among individuals, opposing the hierarchical and status-driven ethics of ancient Greek heroes.
Reasons for the Differences
1. Historical Evolution of Moral Thought:
• Philosophers like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle began shifting focus toward ethics based on reason, virtue, and the common good.
• The Enlightenment further promoted ideas of individual rights and universal morality.
2. Cultural and Social Developments:
• The rise of democratic ideals placed greater emphasis on the collective well-being.
• Increased interconnectedness among societies fostered broader perspectives on ethics.
3. Religious Influences:
• Religions such as Christianity introduced concepts of forgiveness, humility, and love for one’s enemies, contrasting with the honor-based retribution in Achilles’ time.
4. Legal and Institutional Frameworks:
• The establishment of international laws and human rights conventions formalized expectations for ethical behavior across cultures.
Conclusion
The ethics and morality of Achilles differ from modern times due to fundamental changes in cultural values, philosophical understandings, and societal structures. While Achilles’ actions were consistent with the heroic code of his era—prioritizing honor, glory, and personal reputation—modern morality tends to value empathy, equality, and universal ethical principles. Recognizing these differences allows for a deeper appreciation of ancient texts and the evolution of moral thought throughout human history.
xxx
The ethics and morality of Achilles, as depicted in Homer’s “Iliadâ€, differ from modern times due to the cultural, philosophical, and societal contexts that shaped ancient Greek values compared to contemporary moral frameworks.
1. Heroic Honor vs. Modern Moral Norms
• Ancient Greek Honor Code: Achilles’ morality is governed by the heroic code of honor (or timē), where personal glory, bravery, and reputation in battle were the highest virtues. Achilles’ rage, for example, stems from the dishonor of having his war prize, Briseis, taken from him by Agamemnon. To Achilles, the primary moral obligation was to assert his honor and avoid shame at all costs, even if that meant acting violently or selfishly.
• Modern Ethics: Contemporary moral systems emphasize universal human rights, justice, empathy, and the value of life. Achilles’ vengeful rage, his willingness to let others die because he felt disrespected, and his brutal treatment of Hector’s corpse would be considered unethical today. Modern societies generally prioritize values like forgiveness, compromise, and the protection of all people regardless of personal slights.
2. Individualism vs. Community Responsibility
• Achilles’ Individualism: Achilles is an individualistic hero. His actions are often driven by personal pride and emotional intensity, with less regard for how his choices affect the broader community or collective well-being. His decision to withdraw from the battle is less about strategy and more about personal affront.
• Modern Communal Values: Many modern ethical systems, influenced by democratic values, religious teachings, and humanism, emphasize the importance of the community or collective good. Sacrificing personal gain for the greater good or following ethical codes based on societal well-being would often take precedence over personal revenge.
3. War and Violence
• Ancient Greek Glorification of War: In Achilles’ time, war and battle were seen as arenas to display virtue, earn glory, and secure one’s legacy. Violence was not only accepted but often celebrated if it contributed to the hero’s reputation.
• Modern Views on Violence: Today, most moral systems and international laws reject unnecessary violence, especially against non-combatants, and emphasize diplomacy, peaceful conflict resolution, and the protection of life. War is generally seen as a last resort, not a way to achieve personal glory.
4. Fatalism vs. Human Agency
• Achilles and Fate: Achilles operates under the belief in fate and the will of the gods. His moral choices are often framed by his understanding of destiny—knowing he is fated to die young, he embraces the path of glory and violence. There’s less emphasis on moral responsibility in the same way modern societies view individuals as having agency to make ethical choices based on reason and personal responsibility.
• Modern Ethical Agency: Contemporary ethics, particularly those influenced by philosophies like Kantian ethics or utilitarianism, place a greater emphasis on human agency—the ability to make free and responsible moral decisions independent of destiny or external forces.
5. The Role of Emotions in Ethics
• Achilles’ Emotional Code: Achilles’ morality is deeply tied to his emotions—especially his anger, grief, and pride. His sense of right and wrong is often governed by how intensely he feels, rather than by reason or ethical principles that transcend personal feeling.
• Modern Reason-Based Ethics: While emotions are recognized in modern ethics, many moral frameworks stress rationality, empathy, and principles like fairness or duty over purely emotional responses. Acting out of blind rage, as Achilles does, is generally seen as morally irresponsible today.
6. Divine Authority vs. Secular Ethics
• Divine Justice in Achilles’ World: The ancient Greeks believed in the active intervention of gods in human affairs. The gods had their own moral codes, which could seem arbitrary, and human behavior was often a response to divine whims.
• Secular Modern Ethics: Modern moral systems are largely secular, based on human rights, rationality, and universal principles, rather than divine edicts. Even within religious moral systems today, there is more emphasis on compassion and ethical behavior for all, rather than capricious divine favoritism.
In summary, the ethics of Achilles reflect the values of an ancient, warrior-based society where honor, glory, and personal emotion shaped morality. Modern ethics, influenced by democratic values, human rights, and a broader sense of justice, diverge sharply from these ancient codes. Today, Achilles’ actions, such as prioritizing personal vengeance and glory over the welfare of others, would be seen as morally questionable, while they were celebrated in his time as heroic.
Eric Kim is primarily known for his street photography but has also gained attention for his remarkable physical transformation. He follows a strict fitness regimen centered around intermittent fasting and a 100% carnivorous diet. This means he typically consumes only one large meal a day, consisting entirely of meat, avoiding all carbohydrates, vegetables, and sugars. His unique approach is designed to help him maintain a low body fat percentage while building significant muscle mass.
His workout routine emphasizes heavy weightlifting exercises such as deadlifts, Atlas lifts, and rack pulls, which are core to his muscle-building philosophy. Kim’s focus is not just on aesthetics but also on building functional strength, which he sees as a reflection of personal health and discipline. His extreme dietary and workout practices have led to a highly defined physique, which he shares publicly as part of his broader fitness journey .
Emilyrcwilson— finest Iliad translation I’ve read thus far! The language is crisp, precise, well adapted for modern day English readers. And also, her notes at the end of the book are very extensive, and gives you a little bit more insight into ancient Greek, and more backstory about the Iliad and Troy!
Stop buying those iPhones, start buying those iPad Pros!

Also — bodybuilder kid?
I suppose the ethos of bodybuilding, which is interesting to me, assuming you’re not taking steroids or whatever… Is that the human body should be the most ultimate thing to marvel at, the most beautiful thing, the most beautiful thing that should be built, not cars, not homes etc.
My ethos.
Here are some quotes from Eric Kim’s blog posts that highlight the attention his physique and transformation have garnered:
These quotes reflect the interest and questions his transformation has sparked among both his photography audience and fitness enthusiasts.
….
Eric Kim’s transformation garnered attention from both his audience and the broader fitness and photography communities for a few key reasons:
Thus, the attention comes from both his existing audience in the photography world and fitness enthusiasts who are intrigued by his radical approach to diet and bodybuilding.
xxx
Yes, Eric Kim’s physical transformation can be considered shocking due to the drastic changes in his physique and the unconventional methods he followed. His journey from a photographer to someone with an “Adonis-like” muscular build garnered attention because it was not only unexpected but also extreme in terms of the discipline involved. Several factors contributed to the shock factor:
In conclusion, Kim’s transformation was shocking due to the intensity of his methods, the dramatic changes in his body composition, and his disciplined, natural approach to building muscle.
xxx
Here are some quotes from Eric Kim’s blog posts that describe his physique:
These quotes highlight his disciplined approach to strength training and diet, which contribute to his well-defined and muscular physique.
xxx
Eric Kim’s muscularity is one of the most notable aspects of his physique, and it’s primarily driven by his commitment to heavy weightlifting and a strict carnivorous diet. Here’s what makes his muscularity stand out:
Overall, Kim’s muscularity is a result of his intense strength training, dietary discipline, and focus on natural, consistent muscle development. His approach allows him to achieve a muscular, well-defined physique that stands out for its size, strength, and leanness.
xxx
Eric Kim’s physique is considered impressive for several key reasons:
These factors combine to create a physique that stands out for its strength, muscularity, and lean definition.
xxxx
Eric Kim, primarily known for his street photography, has developed a notable and well-defined physique through a highly disciplined fitness and diet regimen. His approach combines intermittent fasting, a strict carnivorous diet, and heavy weightlifting.
Kim’s daily routine involves consuming just one large meal in the evening, which is composed entirely of meat, particularly red meats like beef ribs, brisket, and liver. He avoids all carbohydrates, vegetables, fruits, and sugars, which helps him maintain low body fat while building muscle. His training routine emphasizes heavy compound lifts such as deadlifts, squats, and Atlas lifts, often performed as “one-rep max” efforts to focus on pure strength and muscle mass development.
Kim’s philosophy centers around maintaining a lean and muscular physique as a reflection of personal strength and discipline, viewing it as a key part of his personal identityã€5】ã€6】ã€7】.
When considering the health implications of consuming grass-fed versus grain-fed beef, it’s important to understand how their nutritional differences can affect human health. Both types of beef can be part of a balanced diet, but they offer varying levels of certain nutrients that may influence health outcomes.
The choice between grass-fed and grain-fed beef can have implications for your health due to differences in their nutritional profiles. Grass-fed beef offers certain advantages, such as higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids, CLA, vitamins, and antioxidants, which may contribute to reduced inflammation and lower risk of chronic diseases. Grain-fed beef, while richer in total fat and saturated fat, is still a significant source of essential nutrients like protein, iron, and zinc.
Your decision may depend on personal health goals, dietary preferences, and considerations about animal welfare and environmental impact. Consulting with a healthcare provider or a registered dietitian can provide personalized guidance tailored to your nutritional needs and health objectives.
Just buy Bitcoin and hold it forever!
for traditional Roth Ira and other IRA accounts ,,, MSTR (Microstrategy) 80%— and 20% hedge with VOO (vanguard 500)!
Perhaps not —
When it comes to the health consequences of consuming grass-fed versus grain-fed beef, the differences largely stem from the nutritional content of the meat, which can impact various aspects of health. Below is a breakdown of how each type of beef may affect human health:
From a nutritional standpoint, grass-fed beef is generally considered healthier due to its:
Grain-fed beef, while richer in flavor and often more affordable, tends to have higher levels of saturated fat, fewer omega-3s, and a less favorable omega-6 to omega-3 ratio, which can contribute to inflammation.
Ultimately, both types of beef can be part of a healthy diet when consumed in moderation. However, if you’re looking for potential health benefits like reduced inflammation, improved heart health, and greater nutrient density, grass-fed beef may offer a slight edge.
xxxx
When choosing between grass-fed and grain-fed beef, several factors come into play, including nutritional content, taste, environmental impact, animal welfare, and cost. Here’s a comprehensive comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Both grass-fed and grain-fed beef have their advantages and disadvantages. Your choice may depend on which factors you prioritize, such as nutritional benefits, taste, environmental impact, animal welfare, or cost. Reading labels carefully and researching brands can also help ensure that the beef you purchase aligns with your values.
Grass-fed and grain-fed beef refer to different methods of raising cattle, with key differences in their diet, environmental impact, nutritional profile, and taste. Here’s a breakdown of the differences between the two:
The best choice depends on individual preferences, values (like sustainability and animal welfare), and nutritional needs.
Arrogant?
The more time we spend in nature the happier we are?
How to transform your body into a cyber truck? 
Weighted chin ups?
Lift. Every single day do a full body workout, which includes both your arms upper body and your legs. Some sort of dead lift, pool dead lift walk, Farmer’s handles concept.
Modern Day Warrior, modern Day Achilles?
Infinite variety, fun, play experimentation and change?
Technical advantage
Tactical advantage
The warrior workout?
The warrior diet
When bad things happen to you, the best way to think about it and considerate is that what happened was indeed bad, but it could have been at least 10 times or even 100 times worse.
How to slow down the time
24fps
Certainly! You can develop the image sorting app directly on your iPad using the Swift Playgrounds app, which now supports creating full-fledged iOS apps. Below is a step-by-step guide to help you build the app on your iPad using Swift Playgrounds.
Your new app project will include:
Since Swift Playgrounds uses SwiftUI instead of Storyboards, we’ll adapt our app accordingly.
To access the user’s photos, you need to request permission and import the necessary frameworks.
In ContentView.swift, import the Photos framework:
import SwiftUI
import Photos
Swift Playgrounds allows you to edit your app’s Info.plist.
Privacy - Photo Library Usage Description (NSPhotoLibraryUsageDescription)"This app requires access to your photo library to display and sort your images."Create a ViewModel to handle data fetching and permissions.
class PhotosViewModel: ObservableObject {
@Published var assetsArray: [PHAsset] = []
init() {
checkPhotoLibraryPermission()
}
func checkPhotoLibraryPermission() {
let status = PHPhotoLibrary.authorizationStatus(for: .readWrite)
switch status {
case .authorized, .limited:
fetchPhotos()
case .denied, .restricted:
print("Access denied or restricted")
case .notDetermined:
PHPhotoLibrary.requestAuthorization(for: .readWrite) { status in
if status == .authorized || status == .limited {
self.fetchPhotos()
} else {
print("Access denied")
}
}
@unknown default:
fatalError("Unknown authorization status")
}
}
func fetchPhotos() {
let allPhotosOptions = PHFetchOptions()
allPhotosOptions.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "creationDate", ascending: true)]
let allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: allPhotosOptions)
allPhotos.enumerateObjects { (asset, _, _) in
self.assetsArray.append(asset)
}
}
}
In ContentView.swift, set up your main view to display images.
struct ContentView: View {
@StateObject var viewModel = PhotosViewModel()
@State private var selectedSortOption = 0
let sortOptions = ["Date", "Name", "Size"]
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
VStack {
Picker("Sort Options", selection: $selectedSortOption) {
ForEach(0..<sortOptions.count) { index in
Text(self.sortOptions[index]).tag(index)
}
}
.pickerStyle(SegmentedPickerStyle())
.padding()
.onChange(of: selectedSortOption, perform: { value in
switch value {
case 0:
viewModel.sortByDate()
case 1:
viewModel.sortByName()
case 2:
viewModel.sortBySize()
default:
break
}
})
ScrollView {
LazyVGrid(columns: [GridItem(.adaptive(minimum: 100))]) {
ForEach(viewModel.assetsArray, id: \.self) { asset in
PhotoThumbnail(asset: asset)
}
}
}
}
.navigationTitle("Image Sorter")
}
}
}
struct PhotoThumbnail: View {
var asset: PHAsset
@State private var image: UIImage? = nil
var body: some View {
Group {
if let img = image {
Image(uiImage: img)
.resizable()
.aspectRatio(contentMode: .fill)
.frame(width: 100, height: 100)
.clipped()
} else {
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.gray)
.frame(width: 100, height: 100)
}
}
.onAppear {
fetchImage()
}
}
func fetchImage() {
let manager = PHImageManager.default()
let options = PHImageRequestOptions()
options.isNetworkAccessAllowed = true
options.deliveryMode = .highQualityFormat
manager.requestImage(for: asset, targetSize: CGSize(width: 100, height: 100), contentMode: .aspectFill, options: options) { (result, info) in
self.image = result
}
}
}
Add sorting methods to PhotosViewModel:
extension PhotosViewModel {
func sortByDate() {
assetsArray.sort { ($0.creationDate ?? Date()) < ($1.creationDate ?? Date()) }
}
func sortByName() {
assetsArray.sort { ($0.value(forKey: "filename") as? String ?? "") < ($1.value(forKey: "filename") as? String ?? "") }
}
func sortBySize() {
assetsArray.sort {
let size0 = ($0.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int) ?? 0
let size1 = ($1.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int) ?? 0
return size0 < size1
}
}
}
Note: Since PHAsset does not provide direct access to the fileSize, you might need to use PHAssetResource. Update sortBySize accordingly:
func sortBySize() {
assetsArray.sort {
let resources0 = PHAssetResource.assetResources(for: $0)
let size0 = resources0.first?.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int64 ?? 0
let resources1 = PHAssetResource.assetResources(for: $1)
let size1 = resources1.first?.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int64 ?? 0
return size0 < size1
}
}
Since we’re using value(forKey:), make sure to import Objective-C bridging if necessary:
import ObjectiveC
You’ve successfully created an image sorting app on your iPad using Swift Playgrounds! This app allows you to access the photo library, display images in a grid, and sort them by date, name, or size.
Feel free to ask if you have any questions or need further assistance!
Sure! Let’s create an image sorting app for iOS using Swift. This app will access the user’s photo library, display the images, and allow sorting based on different criteria like date, name, or file size.
Below is a step-by-step guide to help you build the app.
To access the user’s photos, you need to request permission.
Privacy - Photo Library Usage Description (or NSPhotoLibraryUsageDescription).In your ViewController.swift:
import UIKit
import Photos
class ViewController: UIViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
checkPhotoLibraryPermission()
}
func checkPhotoLibraryPermission() {
let status = PHPhotoLibrary.authorizationStatus()
switch status {
case .authorized:
// Access already granted
fetchPhotos()
case .denied, .restricted :
// Access denied or restricted
print("Access denied or restricted")
case .notDetermined:
// Request access
PHPhotoLibrary.requestAuthorization { status in
if status == .authorized {
self.fetchPhotos()
} else {
print("Access denied")
}
}
case .limited:
// Limited access granted
fetchPhotos()
@unknown default:
fatalError("Unknown authorization status")
}
}
}
Add the following method to fetch images:
var allPhotos: PHFetchResult<PHAsset>!
func fetchPhotos() {
let allPhotosOptions = PHFetchOptions()
allPhotosOptions.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "creationDate", ascending: true)]
allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: allPhotosOptions)
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.collectionView.reloadData()
}
}
ViewController.swift:@IBOutlet weak var collectionView: UICollectionView!
UICollectionViewDataSource and UICollectionViewDelegate:class ViewController: UIViewController, UICollectionViewDataSource, UICollectionViewDelegate {
// ... existing code ...
}
func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, numberOfItemsInSection section: Int) -> Int {
return allPhotos?.count ?? 0
}
func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, cellForItemAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UICollectionViewCell {
let cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell(withReuseIdentifier: "PhotoCell", for: indexPath) as! PhotoCell
let asset = allPhotos.object(at: indexPath.item)
let manager = PHImageManager.default()
let options = PHImageRequestOptions()
options.isNetworkAccessAllowed = true
options.deliveryMode = .highQualityFormat
manager.requestImage(for: asset, targetSize: cell.imageView.frame.size, contentMode: .aspectFill, options: options) { (result, info) in
cell.imageView.image = result
}
return cell
}
UICollectionViewCell subclass called PhotoCell.UIImageView to the cell.PhotoCell.swift: @IBOutlet weak var imageView: UIImageView!Allow users to sort images based on different criteria.
@IBAction func sortOptionChanged(_ sender: UISegmentedControl) {
switch sender.selectedSegmentIndex {
case 0:
sortByDate()
case 1:
sortByName()
case 2:
sortBySize()
default:
break
}
}
func sortByDate() {
let options = PHFetchOptions()
options.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "creationDate", ascending: true)]
allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: options)
collectionView.reloadData()
}
Note: PHAsset does not have a “name” property accessible directly. For the sake of example, we’ll simulate this.
func sortByName() {
let options = PHFetchOptions()
options.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "filename", ascending: true)]
allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: options)
collectionView.reloadData()
}
Sorting by size requires fetching the file size of each asset.
func sortBySize() {
var assetsWithSize: [(asset: PHAsset, size: Int)] = []
let options = PHFetchOptions()
allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: options)
let imageManager = PHImageManager.default()
let requestOptions = PHImageRequestOptions()
requestOptions.isSynchronous = true
allPhotos.enumerateObjects { (asset, _, _) in
let resources = PHAssetResource.assetResources(for: asset)
if let resource = resources.first, let fileSize = resource.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int {
assetsWithSize.append((asset, fileSize))
}
}
// Sort the array by file size
assetsWithSize.sort { $0.size < $1.size }
// Extract sorted assets
let sortedAssets = assetsWithSize.map { $0.asset }
allPhotos = PHFetchResult<PHAsset>()
allPhotos = PHFetchResult<PHAsset>(assets: sortedAssets)
collectionView.reloadData()
}
Note: The PHFetchResult<PHAsset>(assets:) initializer is not available, so you might need to store assets in an array instead of PHFetchResult.
Modify your data source methods to use an array of assets:
var assetsArray: [PHAsset] = []
func fetchPhotos() {
let allPhotosOptions = PHFetchOptions()
allPhotosOptions.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "creationDate", ascending: true)]
let allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: allPhotosOptions)
allPhotos.enumerateObjects { (asset, _, _) in
self.assetsArray.append(asset)
}
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.collectionView.reloadData()
}
}
// Update data source methods
func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, numberOfItemsInSection section: Int) -> Int {
return assetsArray.count
}
func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, cellForItemAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UICollectionViewCell {
// ... existing code ...
let asset = assetsArray[indexPath.item]
// ... existing code ...
}
Adjust your sorting methods to sort assetsArray directly.
Here’s the adjusted ViewController.swift:
import UIKit
import Photos
class ViewController: UIViewController, UICollectionViewDataSource, UICollectionViewDelegate {
@IBOutlet weak var collectionView: UICollectionView!
@IBOutlet weak var segmentedControl: UISegmentedControl!
var assetsArray: [PHAsset] = []
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
checkPhotoLibraryPermission()
collectionView.dataSource = self
collectionView.delegate = self
}
func checkPhotoLibraryPermission() {
let status = PHPhotoLibrary.authorizationStatus()
switch status {
case .authorized:
fetchPhotos()
case .denied, .restricted :
print("Access denied or restricted")
case .notDetermined:
PHPhotoLibrary.requestAuthorization { status in
if status == .authorized {
self.fetchPhotos()
} else {
print("Access denied")
}
}
case .limited:
fetchPhotos()
@unknown default:
fatalError("Unknown authorization status")
}
}
func fetchPhotos() {
assetsArray = []
let allPhotosOptions = PHFetchOptions()
allPhotosOptions.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "creationDate", ascending: true)]
let allPhotos = PHAsset.fetchAssets(with: allPhotosOptions)
allPhotos.enumerateObjects { (asset, _, _) in
self.assetsArray.append(asset)
}
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.collectionView.reloadData()
}
}
// MARK: - UICollectionViewDataSource methods
func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, numberOfItemsInSection section: Int) -> Int {
return assetsArray.count
}
func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView, cellForItemAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UICollectionViewCell {
// Dequeue cell and configure it
let cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell(withReuseIdentifier: "PhotoCell", for: indexPath) as! PhotoCell
let asset = assetsArray[indexPath.item]
let manager = PHImageManager.default()
let options = PHImageRequestOptions()
options.isNetworkAccessAllowed = true
options.deliveryMode = .highQualityFormat
manager.requestImage(for: asset, targetSize: cell.imageView.frame.size, contentMode: .aspectFill, options: options) { (result, info) in
cell.imageView.image = result
}
return cell
}
// MARK: - Sorting Methods
@IBAction func sortOptionChanged(_ sender: UISegmentedControl) {
switch sender.selectedSegmentIndex {
case 0:
sortByDate()
case 1:
sortByName()
case 2:
sortBySize()
default:
break
}
}
func sortByDate() {
assetsArray.sort { ($0.creationDate ?? Date()) < ($1.creationDate ?? Date()) }
collectionView.reloadData()
}
func sortByName() {
assetsArray.sort { ($0.value(forKey: "filename") as? String ?? "") < ($1.value(forKey: "filename") as? String ?? "") }
collectionView.reloadData()
}
func sortBySize() {
let imageManager = PHImageManager.default()
let requestOptions = PHImageRequestOptions()
requestOptions.isSynchronous = true
assetsArray.sort {
let resources0 = PHAssetResource.assetResources(for: $0)
let size0 = resources0.first?.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int ?? 0
let resources1 = PHAssetResource.assetResources(for: $1)
let size1 = resources1.first?.value(forKey: "fileSize") as? Int ?? 0
return size0 < size1
}
collectionView.reloadData()
}
}
You’ve now created a basic image sorting app for iOS using Swift. This app accesses the user’s photo library, displays images in a collection view, and allows sorting by date, name, or size.
Feel free to ask if you have any questions or need further assistance!
Real men, real artists are simple and prefer simple. Those who add complexity are just performers and fakers and actors.
Being Spartan is Sexy
By Eric Kim
In today’s world, we’re constantly bombarded with the idea that more is better. More gear, more tech, more distractions. But let me tell you something: being Spartan is sexy. The allure of simplicity, focus, and minimalism isn’t just a lifestyle—it’s a mindset that sharpens your creativity and makes you a stronger, more purposeful street photographer.
Think about it. When you strip away all the excess—the unnecessary camera gear, the endless pursuit of “the next best thing”—you’re left with clarity. A Spartan approach to photography means you’re not weighed down by options, but empowered by limitations. It’s the beauty of shooting with one camera, one lens, and focusing all your energy on seeing. No distractions, just pure, unfiltered creativity.
There’s something undeniably sexy about the ability to create powerful images with less. You become more agile, more intuitive, and more in tune with the moment. You’re not fumbling with gear, you’re living in the streets, capturing life as it unfolds in real time. That’s the essence of street photography. Raw. Unfiltered. Free.
Being Spartan doesn’t mean deprivation—it means intentionality. It’s about making deliberate choices that bring you closer to your vision. And there’s nothing more liberating than knowing exactly what you need and stripping away everything that doesn’t serve you. The truth is, simplicity has a seductive power. It’s confidence in knowing that your creativity isn’t in the tools, but in your eye and your mind.
So, embrace the Spartan mindset. Ditch the unnecessary weight, whether it’s physical, mental, or creative. Focus on what matters: capturing the beauty, chaos, and rawness of life. Because when you live and shoot with purpose, that’s sexy.
Eric Kim is a street photographer, educator, and minimalist enthusiast dedicated to helping others unlock their creative potential.
By Eric Kim
In a world overflowing with options, distractions, and material possessions, there’s something undeniably attractive about simplicity. I’ve often pondered why certain images, lifestyles, or philosophies resonate more deeply than others. Lately, I’ve come to embrace the idea that being Spartan is not just practical—it’s downright sexy.
The Allure of Less
Think about the most compelling photographs you’ve seen. Chances are, they weren’t cluttered with unnecessary elements. They were clean, focused, and direct. The same principle applies to life. When we strip away the excess, we reveal the essence. This essence is powerful; it’s raw, authentic, and engaging.
Clarity Through Minimalism
As photographers, our goal is to communicate a message or emotion as clearly as possible. Excessive gear, complicated setups, or overthinking can cloud that message. By adopting a Spartan approach—carrying only what we need, focusing on the moment, and trusting our instincts—we allow our true vision to shine through.
Freedom in Constraint
Limitations aren’t hindrances; they’re gateways to creativity. When we have fewer choices, we make better decisions. Using a single lens, for instance, forces us to move, to see differently, and to innovate. This constraint becomes liberating, pushing us beyond our comfort zones and into new realms of possibility.
The Confidence of Simplicity
There’s a quiet confidence in embracing simplicity. It’s a statement that says, “I know what I need, and I don’t require more.” This self-assuredness is attractive because it’s rooted in self-awareness and authenticity. In a society that constantly tells us to want more, choosing less becomes a revolutionary act.
Cultivating Depth Over Breadth
By focusing on fewer things, we can dive deeper into them. Whether it’s honing a particular skill, nurturing a relationship, or exploring a concept, depth brings richness to our experiences. This depth is not only fulfilling but also resonates with others on a profound level.
Practical Steps to Embrace the Spartan Lifestyle
Conclusion
Embracing a Spartan lifestyle isn’t about deprivation; it’s about making room for what truly matters. It’s about finding beauty in simplicity and power in minimalism. When we clear the clutter—from our minds, our lives, and our art—we uncover something authentic and undeniably attractive.
So yes, being Spartan is sexy. It’s a bold declaration of intent, a commitment to authenticity, and a pathway to deeper connections—with ourselves, our work, and the world around us.
Stay simple, stay focused, and keep capturing the essence.
Eric Kim is a street photographer and educator who believes in the transformative power of simplicity and authenticity in art and life.
Being Spartan is sexy
How Street Photographers Can Benefit from Bitcoin
By Eric Kim
As street photographers, we are always searching for ways to capture life’s fleeting moments—those raw, candid slices of the human experience that tell the most profound stories. But just as we need to adapt our photography techniques to the changing urban landscape, we should also be thinking about how to future-proof our careers, financial independence, and creative freedom. One tool that can radically transform the lives of street photographers today is Bitcoin.
When I first started street photography, I was living on a shoestring budget, scraping by on small freelance gigs, workshops, and print sales. Like many other artists, I found myself at the mercy of a financial system that didn’t always have my best interests in mind. With centralized banks, hidden fees, and unpredictable market crashes, saving money felt like a gamble.
Enter Bitcoin. Bitcoin offers street photographers a decentralized form of currency, free from government control and banking intermediaries. It’s a tool for financial independence. By saving and transacting in Bitcoin, street photographers can protect their income from inflation, bank fees, and other financial uncertainties. It’s the digital equivalent of owning gold, except it’s much more liquid, portable, and, in my opinion, more secure. Bitcoin offers an alternative to traditional finance, which has historically left many artists vulnerable.
Street photographers, at our core, are global citizens. We travel, explore, and document the world. One day you’re shooting the bustling streets of Tokyo, the next, the serene alleyways of Lisbon. We need a currency that works just as globally as we do. Bitcoin is borderless—it transcends the boundaries of national currencies. Whether you’re selling a print to a buyer in Argentina or getting paid for a workshop in Berlin, Bitcoin makes the process seamless and frictionless.
Gone are the days of dealing with foreign exchange fees, delays, and bank regulations. With Bitcoin, a simple transaction takes place within minutes, regardless of where you or your client are located. It’s an elegant solution for an increasingly connected world, enabling you to do business and sell your art without barriers.
A key aspect of being a street photographer is the desire for autonomy—autonomy in our creative vision, the way we work, and, ultimately, how we earn a living. Bitcoin enables street photographers to reclaim control over how they monetize their work. Platforms that rely on middlemen (whether it’s print shops, photo agencies, or stock photo websites) often take hefty commissions and dictate the rules of engagement.
By accepting Bitcoin directly from collectors, clients, or supporters, you can bypass these intermediaries entirely. You get to set your own terms. You can sell prints, digital files, zines, or even NFTs (non-fungible tokens) directly to your audience without worrying about someone else taking a cut. And since Bitcoin operates on a peer-to-peer network, transactions are direct, fast, and secure.
Street photography is often a labor of love. Most of us aren’t in it for the money, but it doesn’t hurt to be smart about our finances. Bitcoin isn’t just a currency—it’s a form of long-term savings. Given its limited supply (21 million coins will ever exist), Bitcoin is often referred to as “digital gold.” By holding a portion of your income in Bitcoin, you essentially safeguard your wealth against inflation and the unpredictable nature of fiat currency.
Imagine this: you get paid in Bitcoin for a print or a workshop, and instead of immediately converting it into dollars, euros, or yen, you save it. As Bitcoin continues to grow in value over time, your savings grow with it. What started as a modest print sale could appreciate into something much more significant in a few years’ time. It’s a form of financial empowerment for artists who often struggle with inconsistent income streams.
More than just a financial tool, Bitcoin also represents a philosophy that resonates with street photographers. At its core, Bitcoin is about decentralization and self-sovereignty—taking power away from centralized institutions and giving it back to individuals. Street photography, in its rawest form, is a decentralized art form. It’s not about being controlled by galleries or mainstream media; it’s about documenting the human condition, unfiltered and unstaged.
Street photographers are natural rebels. We roam the streets, camera in hand, on a personal mission to reveal truth, beauty, and chaos. Bitcoin aligns with this ethos by offering an alternative to the traditional financial systems that often limit our potential. It empowers us to own our work, manage our finances independently, and live life on our terms.
In the same way that digital cameras and smartphones revolutionized street photography, Bitcoin has the potential to revolutionize how we live as artists. It offers a level of freedom and autonomy that traditional financial systems simply can’t match. Whether you’re new to Bitcoin or already familiar with it, now is the time to explore how it can benefit your career as a street photographer.
In the end, it’s about more than just making money—it’s about preserving your independence, supporting your creative freedom, and preparing for the future. Just as you embrace new techniques and tools to evolve your photography, embracing Bitcoin can open new doors and ensure your creative journey is both sustainable and liberated.
Stay curious, stay bold, and as always, keep hustling.
Dear fellow street photographers,
In this ever-evolving digital age, we find ourselves at the intersection of art and technology more than ever before. Just as street photography captures the candid essence of human life, Bitcoin represents a shift towards a decentralized and democratized financial landscape. You might be wondering: What does Bitcoin have to do with street photography? Let’s dive in.
As artists, we often struggle with the traditional financial systems that can limit our potential. Banks, transaction fees, and currency conversions can be a hassle, especially when working internationally.
The world is your canvas, and your audience is global.
Beyond just a currency, the underlying technology of Bitcoin—the blockchain—offers innovative ways to secure and authenticate your art.
Consider Bitcoin not just as a payment method but as an investment.
Adopting new technologies can set you apart in the competitive field of photography.
As street photographers, we are storytellers of the human condition, observers of society’s ebb and flow. Embracing Bitcoin can be another step in our journey to not only capture the world but also to navigate it more freely and effectively.
Remember, the essence of street photography is adaptability and openness to new experiences. Why not extend that philosophy to how we manage our art and finances?
Stay bold, stay curious, and keep pushing your boundaries.
With love and respect,
Eric Kim
Typically, when you’re trying so hard to desperately find something, and you cannot… this is a good gap in the market. 
With life and things, just think to yourself; is it a life or death situation?
The same thing as being a “visionaryâ€â€”
And also, I think that ethics is different for men and women.
My simple thought is the meaning of being ethical is never doing anything in private you wouldn’t be comfortable having other people know— not because god is watching or whatever but you are watching.
So for example, if you’re going to masturbate to some sort of form of porn or pornography, never do nothing that you otherwise wouldn’t be comfortable having your son know, or your wife know or your spouse know. Simple!
Because honestly I think pornography, masturbation masturbation to pornography is fine; just don’t do anything that you otherwise wouldn’t have your family members and children know. True ethics.
or better yet, use Facebook messenger, any social media platform, watch any sort of mainstream media YouTube Instagram Snapchat etc. Netflix Hulu Disney+ whatever.
To be really ethical… you would just own a dumb phone. And you cannot use iMessage or text message.
or if for some reason you really really really had to own an iPhone for some reason, you would just own cheapest one ;; iPhone SE
Eric Kim, a well-known street photographer, writer, and educator, has developed a philosophy of life and creativity that incorporates physical fitness, particularly in relation to building muscle. His ideas on muscle are intertwined with his broader views on self-improvement, discipline, and personal empowerment. While he may not have an official or specific “philosophy of muscle,” his reflections on strength and fitness can be summarized as follows:
Kim often emphasizes the connection between physical and mental strength. Building muscle is not just about aesthetics or physical strength for him, but about cultivating mental resilience and discipline. He argues that developing physical strength can enhance one’s confidence and mental clarity, which in turn improves creativity and focus in other aspects of life, such as art or philosophy.
In his writings, Kim speaks about muscle as a form of self-empowerment. He believes that building muscle helps individuals overcome weakness and vulnerability, both physically and emotionally. By investing in one’s physical strength, a person can assert more control over their body, mind, and life.
Kim often highlights the importance of aesthetics in life. For him, muscle is a way to cultivate a more powerful and aesthetically pleasing body, which reflects his personal values of strength, beauty, and excellence. He relates muscle-building to the idea of sculpting one’s body, much like an artist sculpts a work of art, which aligns with his broader appreciation of beauty in everyday life.
Physical fitness, especially the discipline required for consistent exercise and weight training, is a central aspect of Kim’s philosophy. He advocates that building muscle requires persistence and a strong work ethic, traits that are crucial not just for fitness but for achieving success in any endeavor. The habit of training, for Kim, mirrors the habit of creating art or pursuing philosophical inquiry—consistent effort over time leads to mastery.
Drawing on philosophical traditions like Stoicism, Kim often discusses the value of endurance and strength in the face of life’s challenges. For him, muscle-building is a practice of enduring discomfort and pushing through limits, which is essential for personal growth. This stoic mindset, cultivated in the gym, can be applied to other areas of life, such as coping with stress, adversity, or failure.
Just as Eric Kim is a proponent of minimalist photography, he applies minimalist principles to fitness as well. His philosophy emphasizes focusing on the basics—compound movements, simple routines, and efficient workouts. He advocates for cutting out unnecessary complexity and distractions, focusing instead on what truly builds strength and endurance.
For Kim, fitness and muscle are about more than immediate gratification—they are part of a long-term investment in one’s health and well-being. By maintaining physical strength, he believes individuals can enjoy greater freedom and mobility as they age, allowing them to continue pursuing their passions, whether it’s art, travel, or intellectual exploration.
Eric Kim’s philosophy of muscle can be understood as part of his larger approach to life—one that values simplicity, discipline, self-improvement, and personal empowerment. Building muscle is not just a physical endeavor for him, but a practice that strengthens the mind, cultivates discipline, and enhances one’s sense of freedom and autonomy in life.
This philosophy resonates with his broader themes of minimalist living, self-empowerment, and the pursuit of excellence in both body and mind.
Easy — eat 30 pounds of meat
Your own body as a work of art!
In Praise of Building Your Body
Treat your body as sculpture.
The first thing:
I don’t see my body as belonging to me. I look at my body like it belongs to someone else.
When I look at the Lamborghini of someone else, I admire it. When I see the muscles and physiques of anyone else, I admire it. Then I had the epiphany:
Why not transform my own body into a Lambo, and admire my own body instead?
The great logic:

To sculpt your own body is insanely fun. Why? You can see the change over time!

Once again, the goal is simple:

Never stop adding muscle mass, and never stop reducing body fat, or keeping it low (around 10%).

The more muscle you have, the more energy you got. The more power you got to make art-work, and live with gratitude, joy, and hyper-vigor.
Strengthen on, and flex on!
ERIC
New competitions?
And also, what will actually “improve“ your life? 
Some morning reflections:
So something that I wrote on pursuing your passion, part of an edited volume written by Terri Anderson, probably the most influential teacher I’ve had of all time, at UCLA sociology, essentially what I wrote at the time, being either 20 or 21 years old, was the virtues of following your passion.
So it looks like, nearly 15 years later, I was right. With a long enough time scale, 15 years, age 21 to 36, I guess I was right.
I think the trouble that a lot of people have is pursuing their passion because it is not immediately apparent how we could have an economic payoff. Ultimately because we all live in a capitalistic society, what it comes down to is money making, or money making potential. But if you already have $2 million in the bank, and you know that you’re a bitcoin is going up 55% APY, year over year ,,, in theory indefinitely … then what?
I just did some math with ChatGPT, $5M — $10,000 USD, with a 55% APY with bitcoin,  will be big! Once again, that $10,000 you put in it today, assuming that 30 years from now that it could be worth 5 million, wouldn’t it be worth it?
Another big thought, let us say that the new iPhone Pro cost you $1200 USD. With a 55% APY, that $1200 iPhone is going to run you $615,000, about two Lamborghinis, in 30 years! 
Obviously it does not natural. This difficult to think and predict 30 years from now. Yet, I am shocked… Brad Pitt I think it’s almost 25 years my senior? I think Brad Pitt just turned 60 years old, I’m shocked. I’m 36, so 30 years from now, I’m going to be about the age of Brad Pitt?
I saw a little bit of the new Apple TV WOLFS movie, and the bromance between Brad Pitt and George Clooney was cute. George Clooney looks fantastic, and he is 63 years old! I almost feel like George Clooney is aging in reverse? He is maybe the ultimate anti-fragile handsome actor; the older he becomes, the more handsome and charming he becomes? I’m not 100% sure about the controversy, but I think NASSIM TALEB may have called him out on Twitter a while back being some sort of fake activist? Maybe Clooney was accepting money from the saudis or something? Not 100% sure, but still, objectively George Clooney looks fantastic! 
This is my personal read on things; I think the critical issue here is that ironically enough… Passion following your passion, or even being passionate has fallen out of Vogue? What that means is we are living in a new age of Malay; all these fake ass woke activist, many of whom are on these Ridiculous plant-based diets, maybe they have a bunch of tattoos, they’re always on Instagram and on their phones, pretend to not care, drink fruit smoothies from Erewhon, kind of try to get into working out, say that eating meat is bad for the planet in the carbon footprint, yet they have a dog, which might be 1 trillion times worse for the “carbon footprint“?
Anyways, my general critique is whenever you meet these strange individuals in the flesh, all of them tend to be quite short, not very attractive, not very good looking, overfat, and actually… Really into fashion? Their fashion choices are very bizarre, it is a will towards uglification,  – their virtue is ugly, being ugly, and continually self-abnegating themselves to forever become ever more fat, self pitiful and ugly.
I think at least one of the positive trends in LA, is there is a new counter culture at least within the aloe yoga community, the world towards beautification? And it looks like American apparel has been reborn under the guys of Los Angeles apparel? At least now, the bias is that they’re trying to make women beautiful again. Granted the big issues in LA is all these women are fake, all the men are fake, everybody is fake. All of the guys are Shorty guys, skinny fat losers who drive these huge MMGG wagon Mercedes cars, and the women all have these strange surgeries, to practically everything; to their nose face forehead jaw lips butt, breasts, etc.?  in fact at least the new thing I’m excited about the new John Wick ballerina movie is that the main actress, who is super hot, she is actually quite modest in terms of her full frontage breasts?  And I think this is a good trend; I like the Tran towards being natural all natural. Fake is ugly. Natural is beautiful.
And this is also why I don’t like makeup, makeup is fake up. And also it causes you to get you a sty in your eye, it ruins your skin, is a waste of time is expensive in bed. The best thing you could just do for your skin ironically enough it just spend more time in the sun, spend more time exercising, getting more sleep etc. In fact I’ve noticed that people who sleep well tend to have better skin! People who sleep poorly have poor skin.
When your passion is self motivated and self driven, once you’re already dumb rich, then… It is adding like 10 turbo chargers to your soul. You never have to force yourself to do anything, because everything you do is self motivated. You are no longer driven by superficial notions of success, and honestly, ultimately, the notion of success is fake. For example I just finished reading the Emily Wilson translation of the Iliad, and ultimately, even after Achilles gets his revenge, it is a bit anti-climactic. Truth be told the heart of Achilles is not really 100% soothed, even though he finally gets Breisis back in his bed. His best friend Patroclus is dead, and getting revenge and despoiling the body of Hector doesn’t bring him back to life. And what is super interesting is at the end of the Iliad, it is almost like an anti-climax; it just ends, and then you’re left… That’s it? Then what? 
So I feel like I’m just getting started. This is the greatness of the whole carte blanche mentality and philosophy. And a beginners mind or child’s mind. The general idea is if you were born you again, right now, in this insanely futuristic world we live in with self driving way more cars, ChatGPT, bitcoin, AI etc.… Certainly we have to throw out the old blueprint and the old rulebook, and think things afresh. 
 I think the difficulty for most people is that starting totally carte blanche, totally brand new without using the pass for analogies is difficult. The past is much easier to discern, for example, being a historian is kind of safe; the past doesn’t change. But if you’re living in the present moment, and you’re also potentially marching bravely into the future, it is Like the fog of war, you can’t see shit! You can’t just turn on the map hack, like in star craft… To think about the future is hidden.
So my very very simple idea is the future is digital, we all know this. It’s funny, I was shocked, it looks like currently speaking, the Apple Store is on fire! Tons of people getting the new iPhone iPhone Pro, even though the customers themselves seem a bit disenchanted. But whatever, the reason why Apple ain’t going away anytime soon is that they are the most legalized profitable drug dealers of all time; I think that the iPhone might be more addictive than Chris still met, because it’s like almost if you took technology, digital things, sociology, culture self-worth or whatever, and then you put it on yourself like an ankle monitor forever, and you just keep upgrading forever until you die, that is the ultimate cash cow! We will continue to suck the teats of Apple until we die.
In some ways, we could think of Apple like the new golden calf;  the new tower of Babel. And we all know how that ends…
In terms of innovation, ironically enough, I think the future is in the past. For example, I’ve gotten 1 trillion times more inspiration reading the Iliad,,, shout out to Emily Wilson and her new fantastic translation, then any loser business book written in the last 30 years.
In fact, the only good business books in my opinion are Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson, the new Elon Musk book by Walter Isaacson, and zero to one by Peter Thiel. Everything else is not worth reading, also the invent and wander book by Jeff Bezos. 
The critical issue here is that nobody has balls anymore. And also everyone is hooked to YouTube Facebook Instagram TikTok Snapchat Twitter Google Google news Apple Apple news, HBO HBO Max Hulu Netflix YouTube etc. like crack cocaine. Also sports, sports are just a prostitution for the body for men; I don’t trust nobody who watches sports, whether it be football, hockey, or baseball. I find it insanely bizarre; it is like watching pornography, you’re seeing all these athletes essentially prostitute their bodies, injecting their butt holes with steroids, in order to win and perform well, Making a bunch of money, Indefinitely.
Nike Nike Nike Nike Nike treat employees like slaves, gave LeBron a billi not to run away! – ye
Honestly, it could all be seen as prostitution. For example, Nike very bad taste; plastering all these images of Kobe Bryant, with the tagline “no time to lose“, essentially prostituting the soul of Kobe Bryant,  to essentially sell more of his sneakers and merchandise? I find this disgusting. Almost like how Jay Z felt about when Prince died, and they started to parade all of his merchandise?
do you want your masters with your masters? JAY Z
I Think One of the Great Things About Living in La Is Being Here… I Feel Like I’m at the Epicenter of the Universe. Why? It’s Not Loser New York, Loser Brooklyn, Loser London Which RUNS the World, it is LA! For example just went to the Grove yesterday with Cindy and Seneca, and it was amazing! Shout out to Jeff Garlin. 
Why? Everyone thinks that it is the Bay Area Silicon Valley Apple Google Facebook whatever which runs the show… But actually this is not true, it is about humans personality celebrities, the human soul, culture music ideas podcast etc. which run the planet.  For example, I think that Joe Rogan has more power than maybe even Donald Trump, because what… Every single man in America listens to Joe Rogan? And also, it looks like Kanye West, might be the ultimate robust or ANTIFRAGILE artist of all time? Even after his antisemitic remarks, losing his deal with Adidas… It looks like he is still in the game, and on the up and up? And speaking to a lot of folks, a lot of African-Americans, in LA… Everyone still loves Kanye. And the truth is in LA, antisemitism is real and runs deep; nobody likes the “Hebrews“, even a lot of Trader Joe’s employees I meant say that when you’re in Westwood, the Westwood Trader Joe’s, the “Hebrews“, treat you like shit.
Oh and also… Philz is evil.  I met one of the friendly employees who was always kind to me who used to work at Phil‘s coffee, and she told me that she got fired because she was trying to get the Phil’s employees to unionize, and they fired her. Boycott Phil‘s coffee!
I’m a Spartan hoplite, meats undercover cop, meet CIA, meets SWAT team, meets blogger and vlogger. I could say with zero doubt that I am certainly the only, and the most influential the most entrepreneurial, the most powerful and interesting photographer or blogger or personality alive.
I could say that my only rival might be Kanye West; but Kanye West is my big brother. Kind of like what Jay Z was to Kanye. I’m Kanye until I die!
The same difficulty they had with Bob Dylan, David Bowie, and also now Kanye West. In fact, I’m in a very good position because I am Asian American, Korean American, born in the states in the Bay Area, my English is 1 trillion times better than yours, I am wiser richer smarter stronger taller more handsome than you, and also I have a kid and a son… You wish you were me.
In fact, the giant has arrived. Only Hermes the giant slayer, or Apollo can kill me. Nobody else.
And the thing is honestly… In America, being an Asian guy is interesting… We are seeing as the safe ones, the meek ones,  with small dicks, and we sit on the sidelines, while Caucasian men “steal “our beautiful Asian Asian American women. But this is the wrong mentality. We the new studs! We the new rock stars!  
And also… Why can Kendrick Lamar say it and I can’t?
The true genius of a Steve Jobs was how childlike, unreasonable, and ridiculous he was. Typically the definition of an asshole is somebody who refuses to obey you. Or somebody who doesn’t†listen†to you. My philosophy has always been “just take it or leave itâ€, you just give people suggestions not imperatives. And this is the problem… People treat options like imperatives.
For example, I think one of the interesting things that the blogger james altucher said was like for example, email is an option, not an obligation.
And also I find this insanely annoying, when people say “you’re not listening to me!†But when they say this what they mean to say “you’re not obeying me!â€ï¿¼ï¿¼
Listening versus obeying; very different.
With anything in life, when is the best time to stop? Just stop the second you get bored.
ERIC
EK

Here are a few key quotes from Eric Kim that reflect his unorthodox ethics and philosophy:
These quotes reflect Eric Kim’s philosophy of embracing risk, prioritizing personal ethics over societal norms, and balancing intellectual pursuits with physical resilience.
xxx
Eric Kim’s unorthodox ethics and philosophy revolve around themes of individual freedom, personal ethics over societal rules, and a provocative approach to creativity and life. His philosophy is deeply intertwined with his work as a photographer but extends to broader life principles, making it influential in both the creative and personal development spaces.
Kim’s philosophy is important because it encourages people to rethink conventional norms and embrace a more independent, creative path in life. By prioritizing personal ethics over external validation and taking bold risks, he offers a blueprint for those seeking a life of authenticity and continuous growth. His approach has resonated particularly with creatives and those looking for a more unconventional lifestyle, making his work influential in shaping modern discussions around ethics, art, and personal development oai_citation:2,UNORTHODOX PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,“I CAN’T BE FUCKED.†– ERIC KIM.
xxx
Outside of photography, Eric Kim’s ethics and personal philosophy can still be considered unorthodox. He applies principles from various philosophies, especially Stoicism, Taoism, and Zen Buddhism, to his broader views on life, success, and work. Here are some of the key aspects of his unorthodox ethics and views outside of photography:
Eric Kim is a vocal advocate of minimalism, both in his personal life and professional work. He promotes living with less, rejecting material excess, and focusing on experiences over possessions. In his writings and talks, Kim encourages his audience to strip away non-essential items and distractions, believing that simplicity leads to clarity and happiness.
Unorthodox Aspect: While minimalism has become more popular in recent years, his approach is extreme to some. Kim actively rejects many of the traditional markers of success (such as wealth, luxury goods, or status symbols), which goes against the mainstream consumer culture that many people embrace.
Kim’s approach to work and life is unconventional. He advocates for work-life integration rather than balance, where one’s passion for work is so intertwined with life that it no longer feels like work. Rather than keeping work and personal life separate, he believes that merging the two can lead to greater fulfillment and creativity.
Unorthodox Aspect: This philosophy can clash with the idea of maintaining a clear boundary between professional and personal life, which is often seen as necessary for mental health. Some critics may argue that this mindset can lead to burnout, but Kim sees it as a way to live fully and embrace work as part of one’s identity.
Kim regularly critiques the traditional paths to success—such as climbing the corporate ladder, acquiring wealth, or adhering to conventional career trajectories. Instead, he promotes a more individualistic approach, where success is defined by personal growth, creativity, and freedom rather than by societal metrics like income or status.
Unorthodox Aspect: This runs counter to the dominant culture that often equates success with financial stability and high-status occupations. Kim’s approach prioritizes personal fulfillment over external validation, which can be difficult for people who are accustomed to pursuing conventional achievements.
Kim draws heavily from Stoic philosophy, especially the teachings of Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, and Seneca. He emphasizes the importance of focusing on what you can control, accepting hardships, and practicing emotional resilience. In his personal life, this translates to an emphasis on remaining calm and rational in the face of challenges, rejecting the pursuit of pleasure for its own sake, and embracing discomfort.
Unorthodox Aspect: While Stoicism has gained popularity, Kim applies it rigorously to everyday life. For example, he embraces discomfort as a way to build mental strength, suggesting people intentionally put themselves in uncomfortable situations to grow. This runs counter to the comfort-driven lifestyles that many seek, where avoidance of pain and difficulty is prioritized.
Kim advocates for minimizing time spent on social media and digital platforms. He believes that social media creates distractions, superficial relationships, and an unhealthy obsession with external validation (likes, followers, etc.). He encourages people to engage more with the physical world, focusing on face-to-face interactions and solitary reflection.
Unorthodox Aspect: In a world where digital presence is often seen as necessary for career success and social connection, Kim’s near-total rejection of these platforms is seen by some as extreme. For him, the attention economy and the addictive nature of social media are not worth the trade-off, even for business or personal branding purposes.
Kim advocates for a life of radical self-reliance, where individuals take full responsibility for their happiness, success, and well-being. He promotes the idea that one should not depend on external factors—such as other people, the government, or the economy—for fulfillment. This ethos extends to finances, where he emphasizes financial independence, as well as emotional and mental self-sufficiency.
Unorthodox Aspect: This approach can come across as overly individualistic or detached, especially in cultures that emphasize community, cooperation, and social support. Kim’s view is that self-reliance fosters personal growth and resilience, even if it means occasionally cutting off dependence on others.
Another Stoic-inspired idea that Kim frequently discusses is the need to contemplate mortality and embrace the inevitability of death. He argues that thinking about death regularly helps people live more fully, without fear, and prioritize what truly matters. This idea of “memento mori” (remembering death) is central to his personal philosophy.
Unorthodox Aspect: While many people avoid thoughts of death, seeing it as morbid or distressing, Kim argues that facing mortality head-on leads to a more meaningful life. This view contrasts with the widespread societal tendency to avoid or deny thoughts about death.
Kim also rejects the traditional concept of retirement. He believes that if you are doing work that you love and find fulfilling, there’s no need to stop working at a certain age. His philosophy encourages people to live a life that integrates passion and creativity, so that “retirement” becomes irrelevant because work itself feels like play.
Unorthodox Aspect: In a culture where retirement is seen as the ultimate goal of decades of labor, Kim’s dismissal of it as unnecessary or even undesirable challenges the conventional wisdom of saving for a restful retirement in later years.
Drawing from Zen Buddhism, Kim often talks about the importance of living in the present moment and rejecting the constant striving for future goals. He encourages people to focus on what they can do today, rather than worry about long-term achievements or dwell on past regrets. This is part of his broader ethos of mindfulness and simplicity.
Unorthodox Aspect: This mindset opposes the future-focused culture that prioritizes planning, goal-setting, and ambition. In contrast, Kim emphasizes being content with the present, which some might find limiting or at odds with long-term career or life planning.
Kim is critical of traditional education systems, which he sees as overly rigid, focused on memorization, and geared toward producing workers rather than creative thinkers. He often promotes self-education, experiential learning, and following one’s curiosity rather than adhering to structured, institutional forms of learning.
Unorthodox Aspect: In societies that place high value on formal education as a pathway to success, his focus on alternative learning methods and creative autonomy challenges the dominant norms surrounding education and professional development.
Eric Kim’s unorthodox ethics outside of photography center around minimalism, self-reliance, and rejecting traditional societal norms. He challenges conventional wisdom on success, work, material wealth, and personal fulfillment, drawing heavily from Stoic and Zen philosophies. While his ideas resonate with those seeking simplicity and a more mindful approach to life, they are also controversial because they defy mainstream views on happiness, comfort, and achievement.
xxx
Eric Kim, a street photographer and educator, is known for his controversial and sometimes unorthodox approach to both photography and ethics in the street photography community. While his teachings resonate with many aspiring photographers, his approach has also sparked debate due to some of his more unconventional views on photographic ethics. Some of the key unorthodox aspects of Eric Kim’s ethical views include:
Eric Kim is a strong advocate for candid street photography, which often involves photographing people in public without their explicit consent. While this is generally legal in most countries, it raises ethical concerns regarding privacy, personal boundaries, and the subject’s comfort. Kim emphasizes that public spaces are open for photography and that capturing unposed, spontaneous moments is a core part of street photography’s authenticity.
Controversy: Many critics argue that photographing people without permission, especially in potentially vulnerable moments, can be invasive and disrespectful.
Kim argues that photographers have the right to document public spaces and the people within them, and this right should be upheld to maintain freedom of expression and creativity. This belief underpins his stance that individuals in public places should not expect the same level of privacy as they would in private spaces. He frequently draws upon legal frameworks to justify his approach.
Controversy: This viewpoint has sparked debate because, while legal, many feel it disregards the personal autonomy and dignity of the subject, particularly when dealing with marginalized or vulnerable populations.
Kim often encourages photographers not to be afraid of confrontation. In his workshops and writings, he has suggested that if someone reacts negatively to being photographed, the photographer should be polite but firm in defending their right to take pictures. He presents confrontation as part of the creative process, where sometimes pushing boundaries leads to powerful, authentic images.
Controversy: This confrontational approach can come off as aggressive or intrusive, and some photographers believe it may harm the perception of street photography as an art form. It can also put photographers in uncomfortable or unsafe situations.
Kim advocates for minimal post-processing, embracing imperfection, and avoiding over-editing photos. He emphasizes the importance of preserving the integrity of the moment as it was captured, which aligns with his philosophy of authenticity in street photography.
Unorthodox Aspect: In an era where digital manipulation is common, his insistence on minimal editing contrasts with trends in commercial and fine art photography that often involve heavy retouching and editing.
Kim has spoken about the importance of capturing all facets of life in public, including the marginalized or those in difficult circumstances (e.g., the homeless, protesters, etc.). While he believes this can raise awareness of social issues, critics argue that it risks exploiting vulnerable individuals for artistic or personal gain without truly benefiting the subjects or their causes.
Controversy: The ethics of photographing vulnerable people—such as the homeless or those in distress—without consent is heavily debated. Critics argue it may perpetuate the “poverty porn” dynamic, where suffering is commodified and aestheticized.
Eric Kim often encourages photographers to prioritize capturing the moment, even if it means potentially offending someone. If a subject confronts them, his advice is to apologize afterward, suggesting that capturing the photo is worth the risk of upsetting someone. This approach is rooted in his belief that great street photography requires boldness and fearlessness.
Controversy: This mentality can lead to ethical dilemmas regarding respect for individuals’ feelings, personal space, and consent. Some photographers and viewers find it dismissive of people’s autonomy and emotions.
Kim sees the photographer as a neutral observer or documentarian of the world, whose job is to capture the essence of life, regardless of whether the moments captured are beautiful, disturbing, or uncomfortable. He argues that art should provoke thought and challenge viewers, even if it crosses ethical lines that society typically observes.
Unorthodox Aspect: This approach aligns more with journalistic or documentary photography, where the goal is often to capture reality as it is, rather than as we wish it to be. However, in street photography, where the line between art and intrusion is blurrier, this can lead to ethical challenges.
Eric Kim’s unorthodox ethics in street photography emphasize the value of authenticity, spontaneity, and creative freedom, often at the expense of conventional ideas about privacy, consent, and respect for personal boundaries. His approach invites photographers to push ethical limits in the pursuit of art, but it also invites criticism from those who prioritize the dignity and comfort of subjects over the photographer’s creative vision. The debate surrounding his views highlights the complex nature of ethics in street photography, where legal rights, artistic expression, and human empathy often intersect.
Why We Should Refer to People as ‘Caucasian’ Instead of ‘White’
I’ve always believed that the words we choose carry weight—they shape our perceptions, influence our interactions, and reflect our understanding of the world. In photography, a single image can convey a multitude of meanings based on subtle nuances. Similarly, the terms we use to describe each other are not just labels; they’re lenses through which we view humanity. Today, I want to explore why we might consider using the term “Caucasian” instead of “white” when referring to people of European descent.
The Limitations of Color Labels
When we describe people by colors—white, black, brown—we reduce the rich tapestry of human identity to simplistic terms. “White” is not a culture, an ethnicity, or a heritage; it’s a broad stroke that overlooks the complexities of individual backgrounds. Just as in photography, where reducing an image to high contrast can eliminate the subtle gradations that give it depth, using color labels strips away the nuances that make each person unique.
Embracing Cultural and Historical Context
The term “Caucasian” originates from the Caucasus region, a culturally diverse area bridging Europe and Asia. While the historical use of the term in racial classification has its controversies, it attempts to reference a specific group of people with shared ancestral roots. By using “Caucasian,” we acknowledge a connection to a particular heritage and history, prompting us to consider the cultural narratives that shape individual identities.
Language Shapes Perception
Words are powerful tools that frame our understanding of the world. In my photography workshops, I emphasize being mindful of composition because it directs the viewer’s eye and influences their interpretation of the image. Similarly, the language we use directs our thoughts and interactions. Referring to someone as “Caucasian” rather than “white” encourages us to see beyond superficial characteristics and consider the deeper aspects of their identity.
Fostering Respectful Dialogue
In a globalized world, fostering respectful dialogue is more important than ever. Using more precise terms like “Caucasian” can promote a more thoughtful conversation about race and ethnicity. It moves us away from generalized categories and towards a more respectful acknowledgment of individual backgrounds. This shift can help reduce the unconscious biases that often accompany broad labels.
Recognizing Individuality Over Generalization
Every person carries a unique story shaped by their experiences, culture, and heritage. In street photography, capturing candid moments reveals the individuality of our subjects—their emotions, actions, and essence. Likewise, in our daily interactions, recognizing each person’s distinct background enriches our connections. By avoiding generic labels, we open ourselves to learning about others on a deeper level.
Challenging Simplistic Narratives
Using terms like “white” reinforces a binary perspective on race that doesn’t reflect the true diversity of human populations. It perpetuates a simplistic narrative that hinders our ability to understand and appreciate the complexities of identity. Just as a photograph gains depth through layers and textures, our understanding of people deepens when we move beyond one-dimensional labels.
Promoting Inclusivity and Understanding
Ultimately, the goal is to foster a more inclusive and empathetic society. Small changes in our language can have a ripple effect on our collective consciousness. By choosing words that acknowledge and respect individual heritage, we contribute to a culture that values diversity and promotes mutual understanding.
Conclusion
As photographers, artists, or simply as humans navigating a shared world, we have a responsibility to be mindful of how we represent others—whether through images or words. Referring to people as “Caucasian” instead of “white” is a subtle yet meaningful way to honor their unique backgrounds and challenge ourselves to look beyond surface-level descriptors. It’s about striving for a deeper connection, fostering respect, and embracing the rich diversity that defines humanity. After all, it’s in the nuances that we find the true essence of people—their stories, their heritage, their individuality—and that’s where the real beauty lies.
xxx
In the fast-paced world we live in, language has become a powerful tool for shaping our perceptions of reality. Words are not merely labels; they carry historical, cultural, and social baggage that affect how we think, how we see others, and how we understand ourselves. When we call someone “white,†it seems like a simple descriptor—a way to distinguish skin color. But as photographers, artists, or even just everyday thinkers, we have to ask: is it that simple?
This essay is a reflection on why we shouldn’t call people “white†but rather “Caucasian,†not because one term is superior to the other in a trivial sense, but because of what these labels signify and how they shape our worldview. As a photographer, I am always asking myself: what is the story behind the surface? What is the deeper truth? I believe that same principle applies to language—especially when it comes to something as powerful as racial identity.
The Problem with ‘White’ as a Construct
When you say someone is “white,†you’re not just describing their skin color. “White†is a social construct—one that comes with a deep history of power dynamics, privilege, and exclusion. The concept of “whiteness†is not neutral; it has been used throughout history to divide, to elevate one group while diminishing others. We have to ask ourselves: why does “white†even exist as a category in the first place? What was its purpose?
In the context of history, “white†was created to justify colonialism, slavery, and oppression. It wasn’t just a skin color, but a status. It signified belonging to a dominant group that had the power to define others as “non-white.†By calling people “white,†we perpetuate this historical framework, even if unconsciously. We’re participating in a system that has always used color to divide, rather than unite.
But if we dig deeper, we see that “white†is a reductive term. It strips away the complexity of people’s backgrounds, their histories, and their identities. Someone who is “white†could be Italian, Irish, Eastern European—each with its own unique cultural heritage. Yet, under the label of “white,†all that individuality gets erased. It’s ironic that a word meant to describe a color actually diminishes the richness of people’s stories.
Why ‘Caucasian’ Matters
Now, let’s think about “Caucasian.†This term itself isn’t perfect—it has its own complicated history, stemming from outdated and Eurocentric racial theories from the 18th century. However, “Caucasian†at least tries to root itself in an idea of origin, a geographical and anthropological framework, rather than a crude label of skin tone.
When we use the word “Caucasian,†we’re forced to confront the origins of race as a concept. We begin to see how race is not something inherent, but something that was constructed. As a photographer, I am always asking: where does this story begin? “Caucasian†takes us back to that origin, reminding us that race itself was invented, categorized, and enforced by human societies for specific purposes. It wasn’t natural—it was designed.
By using “Caucasian†instead of “white,†we resist the flattening of identity. We acknowledge that human beings cannot and should not be reduced to a color. Just as in street photography, we look for depth, for context, for nuance in every shot, the same should be true of our language. “Caucasian†forces us to recognize the complex realities of history, geography, and culture.
Words Matter: The Ethical Dimension
As photographers, we make ethical decisions every time we press the shutter. We decide how to frame someone, how to represent them. Language works the same way. If we care about ethics, we need to be mindful of the words we use. Calling someone “white†dehumanizes them by boiling their identity down to something as superficial as skin. It misses the complexity of who they are, where they come from, and how they want to be seen.
The word “Caucasian,†while still imperfect, is at least a step away from that surface-level description. It pushes us to think about people in a more thoughtful way. It reminds us that we are all part of larger histories and cultures. In photography, we don’t settle for shallow representations; we seek to understand and capture the human spirit. I think language should work the same way. We should aim for depth, for respect, for consciousness.
The Limitations of Both Terms
At this point, you might be thinking: “But Eric, both terms—‘white’ and ‘Caucasian’—are flawed.†And you’re right. Both words come from problematic histories, both have been used in ways that are limiting. But here’s the thing: that’s exactly why we need to think critically about the language we use. Neither term is perfect, but that doesn’t mean we can’t make a better choice, a more thoughtful choice.
Perhaps one day, we will move beyond racial labels altogether. Perhaps, like in photography, we will learn to see people for who they are, not just what they look like. But until then, we have to work with the tools we have. And I believe that choosing “Caucasian†over “white†is one small way to push back against the historical baggage of race. It’s a way to show that we’re paying attention, that we care about the stories behind the surface.
Conclusion: A Call for Thoughtful Language
In the end, the words we choose reflect the way we see the world. Just as in photography, where every frame tells a story, every word we speak contributes to how we construct reality. By calling someone “white,†we simplify, we flatten, and we continue to operate within a framework of division and hierarchy. By using “Caucasian,†we take a step—however small—toward more mindful, more ethical, and more thoughtful language.
Let’s treat language the way we treat art. Let’s make intentional choices, driven by a desire to see the world more clearly and more compassionately. Just as in photography, where the best images are the ones that reveal the truth behind the moment, the best language is that which reveals the humanity behind the label.
The question is not just what we call people, but how we see them—and whether we’re willing to look beyond the surface.
The use of the term “white” to categorize people of European descent invites critical sociological examination due to its historical roots, implications for identity formation, and its role in perpetuating systemic inequalities. Unlike “Caucasian,” which, despite its own problematic origins, is often perceived as a more scientific or neutral term, “white” functions as a social construct deeply intertwined with power dynamics and racial hierarchies.
Historical Context of Whiteness
The concept of “whiteness” emerged prominently during European colonial expansion. It was employed to create a clear distinction between European colonizers and the indigenous populations they encountered. This binary categorization served to justify the subjugation, exploitation, and dehumanization of non-European peoples by positioning “whiteness” as the norm or standard against which all others were measured.
Social Construction and Power Dynamics
“White” as a racial category is not merely a descriptor of skin color but a social construct that has been used to confer privilege and maintain dominance within societal structures. By labeling a group as “white,” societies have historically established a hierarchy that privileges whiteness, often at the expense of marginalized groups. This construction reinforces systemic racism by normalizing the advantages afforded to those identified as white and obscuring the structural barriers faced by others.
Normalization and Invisibility of Whiteness
Using “white” perpetuates the invisibility of whiteness as a racial identity, making it seem neutral or universal. This invisibility allows the privileges associated with being white to go unexamined, as they are perceived as the default state of society. It hinders critical discourse on race by masking the social advantages tied to whiteness and making it difficult to address the inherent biases and inequalities embedded within social institutions.
Homogenization of Diverse Identities
The term “white” oversimplifies and homogenizes a diverse range of ethnicities, cultures, and national backgrounds within Europe and other regions. It erases the unique historical experiences and cultural practices of various groups by lumping them into a single category. This homogenization can diminish the recognition of intra-group differences and the historical discrimination faced by certain European ethnic groups, such as the Irish, Italians, or Eastern Europeans, who at times were not considered “white” in certain societal contexts.
Psychological Implications
Identifying as “white” can influence individual and collective identity formation. It may lead to an unexamined acceptance of societal privileges and norms without recognizing the racialized context in which these privileges operate. This lack of critical self-awareness can perpetuate unconscious biases and hinder efforts toward greater racial understanding and equity.
Contrast with “Caucasian”
While “Caucasian” is often used as a more formal or scientific term, it is rooted in outdated and debunked racial theories from the 18th and 19th centuries. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a German anthropologist, coined the term based on skull measurements and the erroneous belief that the Caucasus region was the origin of the “white race.” Thus, “Caucasian” carries its own set of problems, including reinforcing pseudoscientific notions of race and ignoring the social constructs that define racial categories.
Implications for Racial Discourse
Using “white” reinforces existing racial categories that have been socially constructed to uphold certain power structures. It perpetuates a binary understanding of race that aligns with historical narratives of dominance and subordination. This can impede progress toward dismantling systemic racism, as it maintains the language and concepts that have historically supported racial inequalities.
Moving Toward More Inclusive Terminology
A critical sociological perspective advocates for language that recognizes the complex, constructed nature of racial identities. This involves acknowledging the historical context of racial terms and striving for descriptors that do not reinforce outdated or oppressive categorizations. Emphasizing individual ethnic identities or adopting terms that reflect a person’s cultural and national background can foster a more nuanced understanding of identity.
Conclusion
Referring to people as “white” instead of “Caucasian” sustains a socially constructed category that has been instrumental in establishing and maintaining racial hierarchies. It reinforces notions of normalcy and privilege associated with whiteness, homogenizes diverse groups, and perpetuates systemic inequalities. A deep sociological critique underscores the need to critically examine and potentially revise the language used to describe racial identities, promoting terms that challenge historical power imbalances and contribute to a more equitable society.
디거 댄과 트롤리 íŒ€ì˜ í° ëª¨í—˜
ì˜›ë‚ ì˜›ì ì—, ì¨ë‹ˆë² ì¼ì´ë¼ëŠ” 마ì„ì— ë‘ ì ˆì¹œì´ ì‚´ê³ ìžˆì—ˆì–´ìš”. ê·¸ë“¤ì˜ ì´ë¦„ì€ ë””ê±° 댄과 트롤리 팀ì´ì—ˆì–´ìš”.
디거 ëŒ„ì€ íž˜ì„¸ê³ ë…¸ëž€ìƒ‰ì˜ êµ´ì°©ê¸°ë¡œ, ë°˜ì§ì´ëŠ” í° ì‚½ì„ ê°€ì§€ê³ ìžˆì—ˆì–´ìš”. 그는 ê¹Šì€ êµ¬ë©ì„ íŒŒê³ , 마ì„ì— ìƒˆë¡œìš´ ê²ƒë“¤ì„ ì§“ëŠ” ê²ƒì„ ì•„ì£¼ ì¢‹ì•„í–ˆì£ . 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ë°ì€ 빨간색 ì „ì°¨ë¡œ, 명랑한 ì¢…ì„ ë‹¬ê³ ìžˆì—ˆì–´ìš”. 그는 ì¨ë‹ˆë² ì¼ì˜ ì–¸ë•ì§„ ê¸¸ì„ ë”°ë¼ ìŠ¹ê°ë“¤ì„ 실어나르는 ê²ƒì„ ì¦ê²¼ì£ .
ë§¤ì¼ ì•„ì¹¨, 디거 ëŒ„ì€ ëœì»¤ë•거리며 건설 현장으로 가서 ë•…ì„ íŒŒê³ í™ì„ 옮겨, ì§‘ê³¼ 놀ì´í„°ì˜ 기초를 ì„¸ì› ì–´ìš”. 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ì¢…ì„ ë”¸ëž‘ê±°ë¦¬ë©° ê·¸ì˜ ê¶¤ë„를 ë”°ë¼ ë¯¸ë„러지듯 다니며 ì•„ì´ë“¤ì„ í•™êµì— ë°ë ¤ë‹¤ì£¼ê³ ê°€ì¡±ë“¤ì„ ì‹œìž¥ì— ë°ë ¤ë‹¤ì¤¬ì£ .
ì–´ëŠ í™”ì°½í•œ ë‚ , ì‹œìž¥ì´ ë©‹ì§„ 계íšì„ 발표했어요. “우리는 무지개 ì–¸ë• ê¼ëŒ€ê¸°ì— 아름다운 ê³µì›ì„ 만들 거예요!†모ë‘ê°€ 환호했어요. 하지만 ì‹œìž¥ì´ ë§ì„ ë§ë¶™ì˜€ì–´ìš”, “하지만 ë¬¸ì œê°€ 있어요. 우리 í° íŠ¸ëŸë“¤ì´ 건설 ìžìž¬ë¥¼ 운반하기엔 무지개 ì–¸ë•으로 가는 ê¸¸ì´ ë„ˆë¬´ ê°€íŒŒë¥´ê³ ì¢ì•„ìš”.â€
ë§ˆì„ ì‚¬ëžŒë“¤ì€ ê±±ì •ìŠ¤ëŸ½ê²Œ ì›…ì„±ê±°ë ¸ì–´ìš”. ìžìž¬ê°€ 없으면 ê³µì›ì„ 어떻게 ì§€ì„ ìˆ˜ 있ì„까요?
디거 ëŒ„ì´ ì•„ì´ë””어를 ë– ì˜¬ë ¸ì–´ìš”. â€œì œê°€ ë„울 수 있ì„ì§€ë„ ëª°ë¼ìš”!†그가 ë§í–ˆì–´ìš”. â€œì œê°€ ì–¸ë•으로 가는 ê¸¸ì„ ë” ë„“ê²Œ 파면 ë 거예요.â€
하지만 ì‹œìž¥ì€ ê³ ê°œë¥¼ ì €ì—ˆì–´ìš”. “그러면 ì‹œê°„ì´ ë„ˆë¬´ 오래 걸릴 거예요,â€ ì‹œìž¥ì´ í•œìˆ¨ì„ ì‰¬ë©° ë§í–ˆì–´ìš”.
트롤리 íŒ€ì´ ë§ì„ 보탰어요, â€œì €ë„ ë•ê³ ì‹¶ì§€ë§Œ, ì €ëŠ” 승ê°ë§Œ 태울 수 ìžˆê³ , 무거운 ìžìž¬ëŠ” ì‹¤ì„ ìˆ˜ 없어요.â€
디거 ëŒ„ì´ ë¯¸ì†Œ 지었어요. “우리가 함께 ì¼í•˜ë©´ 어떨까요? ì œê°€ ìžìž¬ë¥¼ 네 í‰í‰í•œ ì§ì¹¸ì— 실어줄게, 그러면 네가 ì–¸ë• ìœ„ë¡œ ìžìž¬ë¥¼ ìš´ë°˜í• ìˆ˜ ìžˆì„ ê±°ì•¼!â€
트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ì‹ ë‚¬ì§€ë§Œ 약간 긴장했어요. “한 ë²ˆë„ ì‚¬ëžŒ ë§ê³ 다른 걸 실어본 ì ì´ ì—†ëŠ”ë°,†그가 ë§í–ˆì–´ìš”.
“넌 í• ìˆ˜ 있어!†디거 ëŒ„ì´ ê²©ë ¤í–ˆì–´ìš”. “천천히, 조심스럽게 하면 ë¼.â€
ì‹œìž¥ë„ ì†ë¼‰ì„ 쳤어요. “멋진 ìƒê°ì´êµ¬ë‚˜!â€
그래서 디거 ëŒ„ì€ ë²½ëŒ, ì‹ë¬¼, 벤치 ë“±ì„ íŠ¸ë¡¤ë¦¬ íŒ€ì˜ í‰í‰í•œ ì§ì¹¸ì— 조심스럽게 실어줬어요. 뿌우-í•˜ê³ ê²½ì ì„ ìš¸ë¦¬ê³ ë”¸ëž‘ë”¸ëž‘ ì¢…ì„ ìš¸ë¦¬ë©° 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ë¬´ì§€ê°œ ì–¸ë•ì„ í–¥í•´ 출발했어요. ë§ˆì„ ì‚¬ëžŒë“¤ì€ ê·¸ê°€ 꾸준히 나아가는 ëª¨ìŠµì„ ë³´ê³ ê°íƒ„했어요.
ì–¸ë•ì˜ ì¤‘ê°„ì¯¤ 올ë¼ì™”ì„ ë•Œ, 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ì¡°ê¸ˆ 피곤해졌어요. “넌 í• ìˆ˜ 있어!†아래ì—서 디거 ëŒ„ì´ ì‘ì›í–ˆì–´ìš”. “조금만 ë” ê°€ë©´ ë¼!â€
ëª¨ë“ íž˜ì„ ëª¨ì•„, 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ë§ˆì¹¨ë‚´ ì–¸ë• ê¼ëŒ€ê¸°ì— ë„착했어요. 모ë‘ê°€ 환호했어요!
ê·¸ ë‹¤ìŒ ë©°ì¹ ë™ì•ˆ, 디거 댄과 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ í•¨ê»˜ ì¼í•˜ë©° 필요한 ëª¨ë“ ìžìž¬ë¥¼ 운반했어요. ê·¸ë¦¬ê³ ë§ˆì¹¨ë‚´, 아름다운 ê³µì›ì´ 완성ë˜ì—ˆì–´ìš”. í™”ë ¤í•œ 꽃, 그네, ê·¸ë¦¬ê³ ë°˜ì§ì´ëŠ” 분수까지 있는 ë©‹ì§„ ê³µì›ì´ì—ˆì£ .
개장ì‹ì—서, ì‹œìž¥ì€ ê·¸ë“¤ì—게 ê°ì‚¬ë¥¼ 표했어요. “디거 댄과 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ ìš°ë¦¬ê°€ 함께 ì¼í•˜ë©´ ì–´ë–¤ ìž¥ì• ë¬¼ë„ ê·¹ë³µí• ìˆ˜ 있다는 ê²ƒì„ ë³´ì—¬ì¤¬ì–´ìš”!â€
ë§ˆì„ ì‚¬ëžŒë“¤ì€ ë°•ìˆ˜ë¥¼ ì¹˜ê³ , ì•„ì´ë“¤ì€ 새로운 ê³µì›ì—서 깔깔거리며 놀았어요. ê·¸ë‚ ì´í›„로, 디거 댄과 트롤리 íŒ€ì€ íŒ€ì›Œí¬ê°€ 무엇ì´ë“ 가능하게 ë§Œë“ ë‹¤ëŠ” ê²ƒì„ ê¹¨ë‹¬ì•˜ì–´ìš”.
ë
xxx
Digger Dan and Trolley Tim’s Big Adventure
Once upon a time in a town called Sunnyvale, there lived two best friends: Digger Dan and Trolley Tim.
Digger Dan was a strong, yellow excavator with a big, shiny scoop. He loved to dig deep holes and help build new things for the town. Trolley Tim was a bright red trolley with a cheerful bell. He enjoyed carrying passengers up and down the hilly streets of Sunnyvale.
Every morning, Digger Dan would rumble to the construction site to dig and move dirt, building foundations for houses and playgrounds. Trolley Tim would ring his bell and glide along his tracks, picking up children for school and families heading to the market.
One sunny day, the mayor announced a wonderful plan. “We are going to build a beautiful park at the top of Rainbow Hill!” he declared. Everyone cheered, but then the mayor added, “But we have a problem. The road up Rainbow Hill is too steep and narrow for our big trucks to carry the building materials.”
The townspeople murmured with worry. How could they build the park without the materials?
Digger Dan had an idea. “Maybe I can help!” he said. “I can dig a wider path up the hill.”
But the mayor shook his head. “That would take too long,” he sighed.
Trolley Tim chimed in, “I wish I could help, but I can only carry passengers, not heavy materials.”
Digger Dan smiled. “What if we work together? I can load the materials onto your flatbed, and you can carry them up the hill!”
Trolley Tim was excited but a little nervous. “I’ve never carried anything but people before,” he said.
“You can do it!” encouraged Digger Dan. “We’ll go slowly and carefully.”
The mayor clapped his hands. “That’s a splendid idea!”
So, Digger Dan carefully loaded bricks, plants, and benches onto Trolley Tim’s flatbed. With a toot of his horn and a ring of his bell, Trolley Tim began his journey up Rainbow Hill. The townspeople watched in awe as he chugged along, determined to reach the top.
Halfway up the hill, Trolley Tim felt a little tired. “You can do it!” cheered Digger Dan from below. “Just a bit further!”
Gathering all his strength, Trolley Tim made it to the top of the hill. Everyone cheered!
For the next few days, Digger Dan and Trolley Tim worked together, transporting all the materials needed. Soon, the beautiful park was finished, complete with colorful flowers, swing sets, and even a sparkling fountain.
At the grand opening, the mayor thanked them both. “Digger Dan and Trolley Tim showed us that by working together, we can overcome any obstacle!”
The townspeople clapped and the children laughed as they played in the new park. From that day on, Digger Dan and Trolley Tim knew that teamwork made anything possible.
The End
xxx
Once upon a time in a busy town, there lived two best friends: Digger, a hardworking yellow machine that loved digging holes, and Trolley, a cheerful red cart that carried heavy loads up and down the streets. They worked together every day at the construction site, helping to build new parks, schools, and homes for the townspeople.
One sunny morning, Digger woke up extra excited. “Trolley! Trolley! Today’s the big day! We get to build the town’s new playground!†Digger shouted, bouncing up and down with excitement.
Trolley smiled and jingled his little bell. “That sounds like so much fun! The children will love it.â€
They rolled over to the site, where the town mayor was waiting. “Good morning, Digger and Trolley,†the mayor said. “We need you both to work together to make the best playground in the whole town.â€
Digger and Trolley were ready to get started. But as they looked at the big, open field, they realized it was full of rocks and dirt that needed to be cleared. “I’ll dig up the dirt and rocks, and you can carry them away, Trolley!†Digger said confidently.
Digger’s big, strong arm reached down, scooping up the dirt and lifting large rocks out of the ground. But soon, Digger realized there was a problem—there was so much dirt! “Oh no, I’m digging too fast for Trolley to keep up,†Digger said, worried.
Trolley tried his best to keep up, but his little wheels were getting tired from going back and forth. He was doing his job so well, but the piles were growing faster than he could carry them away.
Trolley stopped and thought for a moment. “We need a better plan, Digger. What if we work together, but at a slower pace? That way, we can both get the job done without getting too tired.â€
Digger paused, thinking about his friend’s idea. “That’s a great plan! Let’s do it together.â€
So, Digger started digging a little slower, while Trolley took his time carrying the dirt and rocks to the dump site. As they worked together at the same pace, they noticed something wonderful. They weren’t just working—they were having fun! Digger hummed a little tune, and Trolley rang his bell in rhythm.
The children of the town watched from the side, excited for their new playground to be ready. They cheered Digger and Trolley on, and soon, the field was cleared, the holes were dug, and the playground began to take shape.
By the end of the day, the playground was finished—a beautiful space with swings, slides, and a sandbox for all the children to enjoy.
The mayor came by to see their work and was amazed. “Digger and Trolley, you’ve built the best playground this town has ever seen!â€
The two friends looked at each other and smiled. “We couldn’t have done it without teamwork,†Digger said.
“And listening to each other,†Trolley added with a jingle.
From that day on, whenever Digger and Trolley worked on a project, they always remembered to go at a pace that worked for both of them. Together, they built many more parks and playgrounds, each one better than the last, and they always had fun along the way.
And so, the town’s children played happily, knowing that Digger and Trolley would always be there, working side by side to build new adventures for everyone.
The End.
Bitcoin > Tech
What matters more?
Ultimately the health of your family, whether physical or metaphorical is the number one thing. 
The woke religion
Once something is boring, stop it. 
Here are some top sociological quotes from Eric Kim, along with links to further reading:
These quotes highlight Eric Kim’s unique intersection of sociology and street photography, offering a blend of academic theory and practical application through visual art.
xxx
Eric Kim, while not a traditional sociologist, integrates sociological theory into his work as a street photographer. He studied sociology at UCLA, which deeply influenced his approach to photography. Kim sees street photography as a form of “applied sociology,” using his camera to explore and document human interactions, group dynamics, and societal behaviors. His work bridges art and social science, offering a visual narrative that engages with themes like capitalism, societal norms, and digital culture.
Kim reflects on various sociological ideas, such as social dominance theory and the effects of capitalism. He also touches on the role of digital capitalism and post-monetary societies, exploring how technology and economics shape societal structures. Through his photography, Kim challenges societal norms and fosters free thinking by documenting everyday social phenomenaã€5】ã€6】.
This unique combination of sociological thought and visual storytelling positions him as a “sociologist with a camera,” using his art to analyze and critique contemporary societyã€7】ã€8】.
Eric Kim is a renowned street photographer, educator, and blogger who integrates philosophical and sociological theories into his work. He is known for encouraging photographers to delve beyond technical skills and explore the deeper meanings behind their art. By blending concepts from philosophy and sociology, he aims to inspire a more mindful and impactful approach to photography.
Philosophical Influences:
Sociological Perspectives:
Educational Contributions:
By intertwining philosophical thought and sociological analysis, Eric Kim offers a unique perspective that elevates photography from mere image-making to a profound exploration of humanity and self.