Dump ETH! Buy Bitcoin! Vitalik sucks!
Sell Ethereum, Buy Bitcoin!
Dump ETH! Buy Bitcoin! Vitalik sucks!
Sell Ethereum, Buy Bitcoin!
Why MSTR, why microstrategy?
BTC YIELD, KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR—
it is always a good sign when a company is so innovative, so cutting edge, so revolutionary that they have to create their own new key performance indicators to indicate a great thing that is happening, so paradigm shifting that traditional metrics can’t even measure you.
#Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy. – Saylor Sept 18, 2020
Exponentially growing ever smarter faster and stronger,— i’m very impressed that Michael Saylor wrote this nearly 4 years ago?
â€We think that bitcoin could become the next strategic reserve asset†– Saylor
Assuming that you’re all in, 100% invested in bitcoin and micro strategies stock, the only news is really worth following or paying attention to is anything that Michael sailor says, or anything related to stuff that Michael Saylor post to Twitter or ex. To me this is kind of important because once again, it becomes a really really good filter; The news, which does measure market sentiment towards things, is political, and also invested.
my personal thought is too much information too much news is toxic. But, the news could be like medicine; the dosage is the Poison. Or the news can be like coffee or caffeine, having one or 2 cups in the morning first thing in the morning is good, but drinking 50 cups of coffee right before you try to sleep is bad.
Once again, a cup a day of coffee might and probably is good for you, but, 100,000 cups of coffee a day will kill you.
Treasury operations, delivering a bitcoin yield, and providing a net benefit of how much to something.
I think the same theory is if you creature your own treasury operation your own bitcoin treasury operation,
Strategic reserve asset:
Directly Bitcoin — don’t pay taxes.
Trump will pick up the strategic bitcoin reserve asset, maybe up to 1 million or beyond?
With kids, supervised is best!



Once you found the golden goose, the golden eggs, the orange goose the orange eggs, hoard them forever!
Because after all the riches in the world, you’re still going to want to do something!


Still certainly BITCOIN is the GOAT, but still will never knock my #1 true passion for photography!






















Start here:














“He without a past has no future.”
Start here:

Classics never die:
Like there’s not gonna be enough left or any left; and they will stop producing it or mining it,— won’t you still be wanting to get some now while you still can?
If somebody invented water, fire, running water electricity, wouldn’t you want to invest in it?
Buy Bitcoin while you still can!!!
Once in 100,000 year opportunity; the invention of bitcoin. Almost as exciting as like imagine the invention of gold? Or the invention of America?
At least 3x your money in the short run!





Possibly #1? Also assuming Bitcoin is the most valuable asset and thing in the human planet and universe!!!
BTC ,,, bitcoin, today’s Veterans Day the best day ever. This is insanity; it just spiked from a low of 78,000 of bitcoin, to now, practically $85,000 a bitcoin???

Jay Z goals — wouldn’t you have shares, coins, bitcoins whatever… Just keep writing it up to Mars and beyond!
Hmmm,,, seems the truth is bitcoin is connected with politics. Why? After Trump being elected… Bitcoin has essentially reached the stratosphere. And as much as I hate politics, I suppose as long as they own bitcoin, and stock in micro strategy stock, I have to participate.
Long Bitcoin




Brave new world for photographers and crypto:
Certainly! That’s an insightful question. The reason we use the same word “arm†for both our body part and for weapons lies in the historical evolution of the English language, where words from different origins have converged in spelling and pronunciation over time.
Different Origins of “Armâ€
1. “Arm†as a Body Part
• Old English “Earmâ€: The word for the limb comes from Old English “earmâ€, which traces back to the Proto-Germanic *armaz.
• Meaning: Refers to the upper limb of the human body used for tasks like lifting and holding.
2. “Arm†Meaning “Weaponâ€
• Latin “Armaâ€: The term for weapon comes from Latin “armaâ€, meaning “tools of war†or “weaponsâ€.
• Path into English:
• Old French “Armeâ€: The Latin “arma†entered Old French as “armeâ€.
• Middle English Adoption: From Old French, it entered Middle English, initially retaining the spelling “armeâ€.
• Meaning: Refers to weapons or implements used in combat.
Why Did Both Words Become “Arm†in English?
Simplification and Phonetic Changes
• Loss of End Vowels: In the transition from Old French to Middle English, the ending â€-e†in “arme†was often dropped in pronunciation, simplifying the word to “armâ€.
• Spelling Standardization: As English spelling became more standardized, both words settled on the spelling “arm†despite their different origins.
Convergence of Spelling
• Homographs: English has many words that are spelled the same but have different meanings and origins (e.g., “bat†the animal and “bat†used in sports).
• Language Evolution: Over time, words from different languages and roots can converge in spelling and pronunciation due to phonetic simplification and the natural evolution of language.
Influence of Language Contact
• Norman Conquest: The infusion of French words into English after the Norman Conquest in 1066 led to many French terms being anglicized.
• Adaptation Over Retention: English speakers often adapted borrowed words to fit English phonetics and morphology rather than retaining their original forms.
Why Not Use “Arma†or “Armam�
Phonetic and Grammatical Adaptation
• Language Borrowing Practices: English typically adapts foreign words to its own phonological and grammatical systems.
• Simplification: The Latin “arma†was plural and not suited to English singular noun usage without adaptation.
• Avoidance of Latin Plurals: English generally forms plurals by adding â€-s†or â€-esâ€, so retaining the Latin plural “arma†would be inconsistent.
Ease of Use
• Pronunciation: “Arm†is easier and quicker to say than “arma†or “armamâ€, contributing to its adoption.
• Consistency: Using “arm†for both meanings simplifies the language, and context usually makes the meaning clear.
Contextual Differentiation
• Disambiguation Through Context: In most cases, the meaning of “arm†is clear from the surrounding words and sentences.
• Examples:
• Body Part: “He broke his arm while playing football.â€
• Weapon: “They decided to arm themselves for protection.â€
Conclusion
• Historical Linguistic Evolution: The convergence of the two meanings of “arm†is a result of historical language change, borrowing, and simplification.
• Adaptation of Borrowed Words: English often modifies borrowed words, leading to overlaps in spelling and pronunciation.
• Natural Language Phenomenon: Homographs are common in English due to its diverse linguistic influences.
I hope this explanation clarifies why we use the same word “arm†for both our body part and weapons. Language evolution often leads to such interesting overlaps! If you have more questions about etymology or language, feel free to ask.
Certainly! I’d be happy to explain why the word “arm†is used to mean “weapon†in the context of terms like “firearmâ€.
Etymology of “Arm†as “Weaponâ€
The word “arm†in the sense of a weapon has a different origin from “arm†meaning the limb. Here’s how it developed:
Latin Roots
• Latin “Armaâ€: The term “arm†comes from the Latin word “armaâ€, which is the plural of “armumâ€. In Latin, “arma†means “tools of warâ€, “weaponsâ€, or “implements used in combatâ€.
• Adoption into Other Languages: This Latin term was adopted into Old French as “armeâ€, meaning “weaponâ€, and subsequently into Middle English.
Old French and Middle English
• Old French “Armeâ€: Used to denote weapons or tools used in warfare.
• Middle English Usage: The term “arme†entered Middle English, retaining its meaning related to weaponry.
Distinction from “Arm†as a Limb
• Different Origins: Although spelled the same in modern English, “arm†(limb) and “arm†(weapon) have different etymological paths.
• “Arm†(Limb):
• Old English: “Earmâ€, referring to the upper limb of the body.
• Proto-Germanic: “Armazâ€.
• Proto-Indo-European: “Ar-â€, meaning “to fit togetherâ€.
• “Arm†(Weapon):
• Latin: “Armaâ€, meaning weapons.
• Old French: “Armeâ€.
• Middle English: Adopted as “armeâ€, later becoming “armâ€.
Why “Arm†Means “Weaponâ€
• Association with Warfare: The term “arma†in Latin encompassed all tools and implements used in combat, not just weapons held in the arms.
• Extension of Meaning: Over time, “arms†came to represent weapons in general, and phrases like “taking up arms†meant to go to war.
• Collective Term: “Arms†is often used collectively to refer to all kinds of weapons and military equipment.
Examples in Modern English
• “Armed Forcesâ€: Military organizations equipped with weapons.
• “Small Armsâ€: Handheld firearms like pistols and rifles.
• “Armamentâ€: Military weapons and equipment.
• “Armoryâ€: A place where weapons are stored.
• “Disarmâ€: To take weapons away from someone.
Connection to “Firearmâ€
• Combining “Fire†and “Armâ€: When the technology of using gunpowder (fire) to propel projectiles was developed, the term “firearm†naturally combined “fire†(combustion) and “arm†(weapon) to describe this new class of weapons.
• Distinguishing from Other Weapons: The term helped distinguish these weapons from traditional “cold armsâ€, like swords and bows, which don’t rely on combustion.
Summary
• “Arm†in “firearm†comes from the Latin “armaâ€, meaning “weaponsâ€, not from the word for the human limb.
• Historical Usage: The use of “arm†to mean “weapon†has been consistent throughout history, rooted in Latin and carried through Old French to Middle English.
• Modern Understanding: Today, “arms†and related terms are commonly understood to refer to weapons and military equipment.
I hope this explanation clarifies why “arm†means “weapon†in terms like “firearmâ€! If you have more questions or need further details, feel free to ask.
Your physical arms —
Certainly! I’d be happy to delve into the etymology of the words “firepower†and “firearms†and clarify their meanings.
Etymology of “Firearmâ€
The term “firearm†is a compound word combining “fire†and “armâ€. Here’s a breakdown:
• Fire: Refers to the combustion process used to propel a projectile. In the context of weapons, it denotes the use of gunpowder or other explosive propellants that produce fire or combustion gases.
• Arm: Derives from the Latin word “armaâ€, meaning “tools of war†or “weaponsâ€. In English, “arms†has long been used to refer to weapons collectively.
So, “firearm†essentially means a weapon (“armâ€) that uses fire (combustion) to launch a projectile.
Clarification on Literal Meaning
• Not Literal Flames from Body Parts: The term does not imply that fire comes out of one’s physical arms (the limbs). Instead, “arm†in this context is a noun meaning “weaponâ€.
• Historical Context: Early firearms like muskets and cannons used gunpowder, which required ignition (fire) to propel bullets or cannonballs. Hence, they were distinguished from earlier weapons like swords or bows, which didn’t rely on combustion.
Etymology of “Firepowerâ€
The word “firepower†combines:
• Fire: Again, referring to the combustion process in weapons.
• Power: Denotes the capacity or ability to perform or act effectively.
“Firepower†refers to the amount of offensive capability a weapon or military unit possesses, especially in terms of the rate of fire, range, and destructive capacity.
Usage and Context
• Military Term: Originally used to describe the capability of military units, particularly regarding their weapons’ ability to deliver fire against an enemy.
• Modern Usage: Can refer to anything from individual weapons to the overall capability of a military force.
Summary
• “Firearmâ€: A weapon that fires projectiles through the combustion of gunpowder or another propellant. It does not mean fire emitting from one’s physical arms.
• “Firepowerâ€: A measure of the destructive capacity of a weapon or military force, based on factors like rate of fire and explosive capability.
Additional Notes
• Evolution of Language: The meanings of words can evolve, but in the case of “firearmâ€, it has consistently referred to weapons using combustion to discharge projectiles.
• Metaphorical Usage: While sometimes language can be metaphorical, in this case, there is no historical basis for interpreting “firearm†as fire coming out of human arms.
I hope this explanation clarifies the origins and meanings of “firepower†and “firearms†for you! If you have any more questions about language or history, feel free to ask.
if you think about it, without all of the rhetoric, the politics, a fire arm, like literally imagine your arms, but on fire, or if somehow your arms could produce fire. Or shoot out fire.
a lot of people like to hate on him, for him bragging, becoming so successful, Beyoncé’s wife, and then having kids with her, and then cheating on her, kissing and making up, and then cheating on her again.
I think what people don’t understand is Jay Z is from the projects, the Marcy Brooklyn projects, it is not nice there.
what is also very interesting about Jay-Z, is that he is super wise. To me true wisdom is true insight and wisdom but applied to real reality.
For example, one can philosophies about money and economics, and being grateful and being like a monk all you want… But, how much of this is this is the sour grapes fallacy?
I hate you because you’re so tall and handsome and rich and successful and muscular, and your drive all these Lamborghinis, and have so much cash in the bank, and you have all these beautiful women… And also beautiful children.
What some people will do is they will never admit this, and instead, secretly wish that they had all these material successes in the real world, and then secretly hate in spite people who have it, and then tried to teach people the exact opposite, saying that it is virtuous to be poor, to live an aesthetic lifestyle etc.
However, once again… It is very difficult to gauge genuineness here.
Even my beloved Thich Nhat Hanh — One of the most accessible Buddhist Zen monk practitioners of all time, he was exiled from his own country, from Vietnam and the communist, and I’m sure he had a lot of pent-up and resentment and anger towards the communists etc. so my skepticism then becomes, how much of this monk life lifestyle you adopt, simply because you like the political or the military force or the physical power or the manpower or the fire power to fight back?
JAY Z—
“I’m on that total fucking opposite!â€
don’t be a parasite, trying to siphon off the success or piggybacking off the labor of others.
to build something, however foolish and meat seem, in how long it might take, however much money labor effort skills tech technologies craftsman, paints, renovations, human time and labor and inside; just let them build it themselves and do their thing, and let them do their successes and gain their own successes.
my suggestion; be on the total fucking opposite!
Show me the capital!
So a very very big suggestion, also hugely practical; never ever ever do any sort of finances trades, money economic stuff or investing or financial stuff at night, when you are tired week, and you just had a massive food coma after feasting on glorious beef ribs and lamb. No. Only do it in the morning, after you had had your morning coffee, you’re starting to boot up, feel energized, and outside in the direct sun beautiful.
I think where we fail is when we plunge into stuff, before we are truly 100% ready; even an interesting thing I learned from Jeff Bezos, from his interview with Lex Friedman, is that actually, Jeff Bezos likes to “put around“, Which is interesting because he is one of the worlds richest most successful people of all time, and there’s this weird quote that somehow we have to force ourselves to quickly boot up in the morning, and quickly force ourselves to become productive, almost immediately?
so assuming that your full-time profession was essentially the markets, market research etc.… Then the true wise optimal strategy is to condition your body your soul your physiology your health food intake to maximize your money making potential?
impractical matters, this means giving yourself the access to the best, finest quality coffee on the planet, to maximize your physiological and mental performance, not drinking the cheap stuff, and I think this is actually another big one; optimizing your fitness exercise, your physiology you’re walking your time outdoors in the direct on whatever, you’re freedom, do you think more, to consider more, to become more.
Truth be told, politics is the ultimate entertainment. Why? Politics have to do with human beings human lives etc. I believe money, economics, even finances to be a bit more pure, as economics and money is kind of attached to human beings but kind of not. It is still based more on economic principles, technology, financial networks etc.
I think the critical issue with politics is that honestly it is all rhetoric, gravel housing. It is about political connections, back scratching, all of this dirty business.
But what if we can make politics fun again? The goal?
The past election cycle, when having to check all these boxes, having to do all this research literally gave me the worst headache in my life. Maybe trying to approach it from a blank slate, with more happiness joy freedom and fun; this might be the way?
We all tune into Twitter, social media or whatever for the newest news. But what if instead, maybe backed with bitcoin or the lightning network or satoshis you can create a more wonderful glorious social media?
Everywhere I look, everyone is seeking some sort of retro thing. But maybe this is all a bad strategies; to use the pass as an analogy for the future is a degeneration.
Rather, the more virtuous better strategy at hand is instead, to open arm hold and embrace the current, the present, the future. The general idea is instead, we have to think a modern, we have to think car wash, think classic, an ancient values, but perhaps modern day designs and approaches.
For example, I see all these people these really really old modified Integras, and I recall, back in the day, when I wanted a car like that. Now I look at these cars wow, they just seem and look stupid to me.
 so the first thought is actually, seeking some sort of past design, some sort of past thing, is a positively bad thing. Why? When you are too stuck in the past, you cannot start carte blanche, blank slate considering the future.
Even looking at houses and homes, the number one issue is that all these houses… Why are they so damn old? Literally built in the 20s, 50s, maybe 70s? I’ve never seen a house being sold on the market, it wouldn’t the construction was in the 90s, 2000s, or even 2020s?
This is where housing and houses in the housing market seems like such a scam; come on… It is year 2024, we are living so future, why are we still stuck in these old ass analogies of the past? Why not embrace the present and the future? 
Another reason maybe why it is not good to live by yourself in some sort of weird Homestead is that you end up feeling trapped?
to me , the ultimate goal is feeling freedom, openness, — pure open skies?
This is simply too exciting! I don’t want to miss out, even though it all might be really bad?
I have a theory; maybe in life, politics, other people, all the stuff like this, the truth is it is far more exciting and fun; a grand and great challenge, which I think if you seek excitement could be a great thing!
Maybe the problem is simply when people aren’t strong enough to handle it or a stomach it?
Society as one of the most sublime, amazing inventions of all time?
Dynamic Undulation
When it pertains to other people or their kids or whatever, just ignore it, but, being engaged if it applies to you or your kids. Or family or mom!
*
Coming up with your own economic theories and ideas without having to read the works of others ?
Think Ancient. 
To fully wrap a 2010 Toyota Prius in 3M’s Matte Black vinyl, you’ll need approximately 200 to 250 square feet of material. This estimate accounts for the vehicle’s size and includes extra material to accommodate for errors and complex areas like bumpers.
3M’s Matte Black vinyl wrap is typically sold in rolls that are 5 feet wide. For a full wrap, you would need a roll measuring between 40 to 50 feet in length (5 feet wide x 40-50 feet long), totaling 200 to 250 square feet.
The cost of 3M’s Matte Black vinyl wrap varies depending on the retailer and the length of the roll. For example, a 5ft x 25ft (125 sq ft) roll is priced at approximately $289.19, and a 5ft x 60ft (300 sq ft) roll is around $677.31.
Based on these prices, the material cost for wrapping your Prius would range from approximately $578.38 to $677.31, depending on the exact amount of vinyl purchased and the supplier’s pricing.
Please note that these estimates are for the vinyl material only and do not include additional supplies such as application tools or professional installation services.
Maybe there needs to be more people who philosophize about bitcoin, like bitcoin philosophers? 
Bitcoin and microstrategy stock for making money, but my prime interest is philosophy?
so what I believe to be so insanely innovative, and important about bitcoin is that it is truly the ultimate option. The ultimate access to everything; ultimate access to power, portability insight, world global economics, and also… The ultimate portable transferable, liquid asset on the planet
So let us consider, one of the grand is upsides of bitcoin is that you are not stuck to any sort of institution financial institution etc. You are censorship proof to anything, I’m not sure if this is really true, but I’ve heard stories of all of these controversial figures Losing their banking privileges, because like Kanye West said something anti-somatic anti-Jewish people or whatever. Not sure if this is really 100% true but it seems to be a common trope. The ultimate idea is with bitcoin you are censorship proof, nobody could censor you, for anything.
In fact, what I also love and appreciate about bitcoin is that it makes me free of politics. Certainly there are certain political events and happenings which do change things like for example Donald Trump becoming president but besides this, none of the real bitcoin news has really affected me at all; And even micro strategy micro strategy stock, Mike Saylor, because they are a publicly traded corporation based in America, certainly politics do matter a little bit… But still, given the micro strategy stock has about 250,000 bitcoin, nearly 10 X more than even the closest competitor which has only about 20,000, What does that means is with their ambitious $42 billion plan over the next three years to accumulate and acquire more bitcoin, becoming the first bitcoin treasury company, aptly titled â€BTC‖ and now that bitcoin has hit the record high of about $77,000 a Bitcoin, and because it will almost most likely indefinitely hit $78,000, 79,000, breaking 80,000, 90,000 100,000, 120,000, 122,000 etc.,  and then eventually hitting 1.2 million, 12 million, maybe even $77 million a bitcoin, – you don’t really need to follow the news very closely. Just rest and vest. 
My personal thought and strategy my personal bitcoin strategy, is have maybe at least like $150,000 worth of micro strategy stock, which is like your own piggy bank your own ATM machine, your own cash, your own US dollar cash cow hyper charger … and you could just draw upon your cash reserve assets whenever you would like. And just then store 90% of your other wealth directly into bitcoin via Coinbase.
so what I believe to be so insanely innovative, and important about bitcoin is that it is truly the ultimate option. The ultimate access to everything; ultimate access to power, portability insight, world global economics, and also… The ultimate portable transferable, liquid asset on the planet.
So let us consider, one of the grand is upsides of bitcoin is that you are not stuck to any sort of institution financial institution etc. You are censorship proof to anything, I’m not sure if this is really true, but I’ve heard stories of all of these controversial figures Losing their banking privileges, because like Kanye West said something anti-somatic anti-Jewish people or whatever. Not sure if this is really 100% true but it seems to be a common trope. The ultimate idea is with bitcoin you are censorship proof, nobody could censor you, for anything.
In fact, what I also love and appreciate about bitcoin is that it makes me free of politics. Certainly there are certain political events and happenings which do change things like for example Donald Trump becoming president but besides this, none of the real bitcoin news has really affected me at all; And even micro strategy micro strategy stock, Mike Saylor, because they are a publicly traded corporation based in America, certainly politics do matter a little bit… But still, given the micro strategy stock has about 250,000 bitcoin, nearly 10 X more than even the closest competitor which has only about 20,000, What does that means is with their ambitious $42 billion plan over the next three years to accumulate and acquire more bitcoin, becoming the first bitcoin treasury company, aptly titled â€BTC‖
on the country, I most believe that there is a stronger ethical imperative to spend more time to send the fuck out, to empty your mind soul brain and being, and spend more time thinking for yourself by yourself, without the noise of the outside world, even if they are correct?
I think there is 1 trillion times more wisdom in your own soul brain environment feet and gut then all of the smart trillionaire’s on the planet. You are the ultimate seat of intuition, all you need is some fresh air, the outside, your own 2 feet, The freedom of walking around, access to the direct sun etc., then you got it all.
I think the whole issue with the whole traditional key 12 educational system, and also the Judeo-Christian morals and ethics, even Islam, all of the Abraham fits, it is all dependent on some sort of authority figure a higher power or God or God head etc. Even the ancient Greeks did not accredited their own insights and wisdom to themselves, they would trust the muses.
But my simple intervention, why can’t we why don’t we just trust ourselves? Our own intuition, our own gut, etc.?
it is my personal belief that if we spent less time considering the opinions of others, and we just spent more time considering our own opinion, we might be 1 trillion times better off. There would be less issues in life, more happiness joy and thriving.
I believe one of my deep and great insights to be that actually in fact, to have your own thoughts into think on your own 2 feet is considered immoral, unethical, bad and evil. Why? No man is allowed to have his own legitimacy his own beliefs. Man is only permitted to have an opinion if he gives fellatio to some sort of other power or being or authority figure; man cannot be authority figure in himself.
even a lot of these strange figures who tried to start their own colts, because they have a hard time invoking their own authority, they will refer to some sort of supreme power or being; I find this to be ridiculous. Buddhists do it with Buddha, christians do it with Jesus and God, Catholics do it to the pope the Vatican, Jesus mother Mary Saint Paul Saint Peter all the apostles the holy Catholic Church, the communion Saints, the father son the Holy Spirit, people who follow Islam duet with Muhammad the prophet as well as Allah, economist do it with economic theory, money capital and the like, philosophers do it with quoting other philosophers from the past, an artist tried to legitimize themselves with skinny fat loser art critics.
Once again the issue here is it is considered unethical to have your own self-esteem. You are not permitted to own your own feeling or self estimate of yourself, you cannot metricate yourself, without somehow measuring your value or you’re worth what data statistics facts, dollars, ones and zeros, likes followers views etc.
You got 1 million views, I got $1 million dollars!
Options options options options options which ones should I pick?
I don’t need to own it, I could just visit it rent it borrow it try it out for the week or weekend!
I think this is also a big thing, we Americans we are so silly in our notion of “ownership“, we both believe that in order to gain legitimacy, we have to “own†the underlying asset.  but I was thinking about it… Never really kind of own anything, maybe besides bitcoin.
Why? So for example let us say that you own a single-family home property whatever, you don’t really 100% owned, you’re just borrowing it from the federal government, the local city government etc. And you’re paying a huge state tax fee local fee tax fee etc.
Also, vehicles automobiles cars etc., as long as you’re sooner or later taking some sort of public Road Highway, freeway etc., you don’t really 100% on your car either because you’re just kind of leasing the rights to use your vehicle on public roads, as long as you had to pay some sort of DMV fee and sticker, you never really 100% own your vehicle.
And also, you still have to pay car insurance, like forever. And once again, vehicle registration fees. Even the fees even though the fees are not super super high, you still gotta pay something.
I think also one of the soccer fallacies is that some people fall victim to this notion of somehow like you buy some sort of RV or truck or converted Mercedes sprinter van and you could somehow turn it into like a mobile house or a mobile RV, and then you could just finally become free travel through the states whatever, etc.… But still you’re kind of a slave because you still have to find somewhere to park at night, you often had to pay a fee to park somewhere, And also, more private things like you gotta pay for sanitation to plumb out your vehicle, you still need to buy food and stuff, etc. This is where I still think it is wiser to just rent an apartment and somewhere desirable where you could just walk everywhere because once again,Americans we were romanticize the idea other great American road trip and being on the road, but still… The ideal strategy is to spend like close to 0% of your time in a car or a vehicle, and you try to instead, spend about 100% of your time walking around outside in the direct light or the direct sun.
So the ideal goal is to find a place or a local or a city or neighborhood or area that you absolutely love like for me in Culver City, the arts district, and you could just 100% pedestrian walk yourself everywhere, just jump on the metro E line if you want, and just go on a drive if you want. 
And once again, location location location location location. I still cannot stress this enough; because of the laws of physics, Los Angeles, Los Angeles traffic; still the most intelligent strategy in life is to find the best location absolutely, in which you never have to drive more than five minutes a day. Or driving just becomes an optional thing; you could actually live a virtuous 100% pedestrian lifestyle.
So I think the biggest issue here is that walking is not really popular as a past time because it is difficult to monetize. Compare this instead of running or jogging or whatever, easy easy easy because you could sell these stupid overpriced $300 or $400 running sneakers, which are only for skinny fat losers. 
And also, I think maybe this is the reason why automobile cars are so sought after an American society; because our society almost close to 100% of it is still dependent on a car, only society in which nobody really owns a car is probably New York New York City or Brooklyn, or the main island; even the rich people don’t really own a car, they might have a private driver or they might just even take the metro, or just walk or even take an Uber. Which is even easier than coordinating a personal driver.
Even in San Francisco, sooner or later everyone kind of wants a car or a Tesla or something, or maybe a Waymo,  but the sense I have is nobody wants to live in San Francisco anymore, not the huge exodus out of the Bay Area, in fact more people I see in tech are settling in Los Angeles West Los Angeles, even my tech cousin Daniel just moved to the Sawtelle neighborhood. 
Sooner or later everybody ends up in LA.
So my very very simple suggestion is with life and everything in general, just get off of loser Instagram TikTok YouTube Spotify Twitter all of the social media services. Even I was randomly getting back into Twitter because there are lots of important financial news to stay updated there, and before Trump got elected, it was actually kind of necessary for me to do some research about his policies about bitcoin and crypto, because I am 100% all in on bitcoin. But still… Access to the information the news the truth, it is so toxic. Maybe it is better to be a little bit more poor, without the toxicity, rather than being richer with more toxicity. 
Better to be poorer, and less toxic rather than be richer and more toxic.