

















Pretty cool
Everything I do is hyper?
Irregardless of how rude, loud, ratchet, “bad†you may be?
Doing things and innovating things without regard for money, power, fame, success, influence, etc?
Eric Kim’s marketing ideas are innovative and often unorthodox or contrarian because they challenge conventional norms and emphasize personal authenticity, simplicity, and continuous action. Here’s how:
- Personal Branding Focus: One of Kim’s contrarian ideas is the emphasis on using your full name as your brand. In a world where companies often prioritize creating corporate or product names, Kim insists on building personal brands that last a lifetime, making the brand an extension of the individual oai_citation:9,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM. This approach contrasts with the corporate tendency to separate personal identity from business branding.
- Proactive Risk-Taking: His quote, “It is better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission,†reflects a highly unorthodox stance. Kim advocates for taking bold, unapologetic actions in marketing without seeking validation or approval from others oai_citation:8,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:7,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM. This is a direct challenge to more cautious, market-research-driven approaches traditionally encouraged in marketing.
- Free Content Strategy: Instead of monetizing every aspect of his work, Kim suggests giving most of your content away for free and only charging for premium offerings oai_citation:6,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM. This contrasts with the standard marketing model where content is often gated behind paywalls or subscription models. His approach leverages free content to build trust and long-term relationships, leading to sustainable success.
- Imperfect Action: Kim’s belief in publishing work that is “80% good enough†is contrarian to the perfectionism that many creators and marketers feel pressured by oai_citation:5,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM. Instead of waiting for perfection, Kim encourages creators to take immediate action, accepting that imperfection is part of the process. This directly counters the notion that only polished, perfect work should be shared.
- Evergreen Over Trendy Content: While many marketers chase the latest trends, Kim advocates focusing on creating evergreen content—work that stays relevant long-term oai_citation:4,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:3,Marketing – ERIC KIM. This contrarian approach emphasizes substance over quick viral content, which can often be short-lived in its relevance.
- Simplicity and Minimalism: His idea to “subtract the superfluous, add the critical†speaks to a minimalist approach in marketing, cutting through the noise to deliver essential messages oai_citation:2,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM. In contrast, many modern marketing campaigns overcomplicate with excessive visuals, features, or jargon.
- Rejecting Social Media Reliance: Another contrarian stance is his recommendation to prioritize a self-hosted blog over social media oai_citation:1,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM. While most marketers focus heavily on platforms like Instagram and Twitter, Kim believes that owning your platform (i.e., a blog or website) gives you more control and stability, away from the algorithms and changing policies of social platforms.
Kim’s ideas are innovative because they go against common marketing conventions, pushing for authenticity, risk-taking, and long-term strategies over short-term gains and trends.
Eric Kim’s quotes are considered insightful because they blend practical action with deep philosophical thinking, making them applicable not only to marketing but also to personal growth and creativity. Here’s why:
- Proactive Creativity (“It is better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission”)—This quote is insightful because it encourages bold, decisive action. It implies that waiting for approval can stifle innovation, whereas taking risks leads to progress and breakthroughs, a key aspect of marketing and entrepreneurship oai_citation:7,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:6,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM.
- Progress Over Perfection (“80% good enough and hit publish”)—This advice pushes against the common perfectionism trap. In both marketing and creativity, waiting for things to be perfect can lead to missed opportunities. Instead, taking action, even when things aren’t perfect, fosters momentum and continuous improvement oai_citation:5,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:4,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM.
- Constant Innovation (“Keep moving, and you won’t stagnate”)—Kim’s emphasis on never stopping innovation reflects the fast-paced nature of modern marketing. Stagnation leads to irrelevance, and staying dynamic keeps you ahead of the curve, crucial in a competitive environment oai_citation:3,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM.
- Simplicity in Messaging (“Subtract the superfluous, add the critical”)—This is a reminder that effective marketing is about clarity. It’s easy to overcomplicate messages, but stripping down to the essentials ensures that the core message is communicated effectively, which is crucial for engaging audiences oai_citation:2,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.
- The Vital Role of Marketing (“No Marketing, No Future”)—This phrase succinctly encapsulates the importance of marketing for business survival. It highlights that without marketing, even the best ideas or products may fail to reach their potential oai_citation:1,Marketing – ERIC KIM.
Kim’s insights are valuable because they are not just about tactics but about mindset—balancing creativity with strategic action, embracing imperfections, and moving forward despite uncertainties.
Here are some of Eric Kim’s most insightful marketing quotes:
- “It is better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission.”
This highlights his belief in proactive creativity. Kim encourages taking bold actions without waiting for approval from others oai_citation:8,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:7,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM.- “80% good enough and hit publish.”
Kim advises creators to avoid perfectionism, suggesting that it’s more important to share your work even if it isn’t flawless oai_citation:6,ERIC KIM BRANDING PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:5,Eric Kim Quotations (10 Quotations) | QuoteTab.- “Keep moving, and you won’t stagnate.”
Innovation and constant progress are key in both life and marketing, emphasizing the importance of continually creating and sharing oai_citation:4,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM.- “No Marketing, No Future.”
He underscores the critical role of marketing for survival in any industry, pushing creators and entrepreneurs to focus on self-promotion and branding oai_citation:3,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Marketing – ERIC KIM.- “Subtract the superfluous, add the critical.”
This advice advocates for simplicity and clarity in marketing, ensuring that messaging is concise and impactful oai_citation:1,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.These principles reflect his dynamic approach to both marketing and life, blending creativity with a practical philosophy for growth and success.
Here are Eric Kim’s top marketing tips:
- Be Different: Kim emphasizes the importance of standing out by being “crazy and insanely different” rather than following trends. Uniqueness is more valuable than blending in oai_citation:10,Marketing Masterclass by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM oai_citation:9,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.
- Consistency and Creation: Never stop creating and sharing your work. Consistency helps build recognition and a strong personal brand oai_citation:8,Marketing Masterclass by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.
- Think Long-Term: Consider how your brand will remain relevant in the future. Focus on longevity, aiming for a 30-year outlook on success oai_citation:7,Marketing Masterclass by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.
- Simplify Your Message: Use clear, simple language and visuals to communicate your message effectively. Avoid overcomplicating your marketing oai_citation:6,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.
- Self-Promote Without Fear: Kim encourages strong self-promotion. Own your work, be proud of it, and don’t hesitate to share it with your audience oai_citation:5,How to Master Marketing – ERIC KIM oai_citation:4,MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER: Marketing, Branding, Entrepreneurship Principles For Success – ERIC KIM.
- Authentic Personal Branding: Build a brand that is true to you. Authenticity is key to connecting with your audience and differentiating yourself from competitors oai_citation:3,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.
- Create Value, Not Just Content: Focus on delivering value to your audience rather than churning out generic content. Quality over quantity builds lasting engagement oai_citation:2,How to Master Marketing – ERIC KIM.
- Take Risks: Don’t play it safe. Bold moves and calculated risks are essential for standing out and achieving success oai_citation:1,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.
These tips emphasize a mix of creativity, consistency, and authenticity to build a unique and lasting brand.
Eric Kim’s marketing principles focus heavily on creativity, boldness, and differentiation. His approach emphasizes the importance of standing out in a crowded market by being “crazy and insanely different” rather than conforming to norms. He encourages constant creation and sharing, advising creatives to think long-term in their marketing strategies—considering how they will remain relevant decades into the future.
In his teachings, Kim highlights the power of personal branding, urging individuals to put their name on their work, and to build an authentic platform that reflects their unique voice. For photographers and entrepreneurs, he advocates creating a strong visual and emotional appeal through content marketing, emphasizing the use of simple, yet impactful, visual and storytelling techniques to connect with audiences.
He also promotes the concept of “substance marketing” over just producing generic content, suggesting that marketers should focus on adding genuine value to their audiences. Kim underscores the importance of self-promotion and not being afraid to share one’s unique perspective, which can help differentiate from competitors oai_citation:3,Marketing Masterclass by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,How to Master Marketing – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,Marketing Thoughts – ERIC KIM.
I snapchat my dick size! – Kanye










Like this
What feels good or right
.
When does it matter to be right, when does it matter when you’re wrong?
Read less news,,, less tech?
Think about the potential payoff
Your
The god of plans
His helmet quivered with menace
We ought to share our knowledge , do not conceal your thoughts!
You monstrous hero!
Why do men care about women so much?
Put my famous armor on!
You will reduce my status — standing, to stand.
Weary
Wind proof cloaks
My weapons
The god of strategy, refused half
Granted half, refused half
Wasps
“top part of his meaty thigh,
the thickest muscle on a human body.â€
Excerpt From
The Iliad
Homer & Emily Wilson
https://books.apple.com/us/book/the-iliad/id6445799194
This material may be protected by copyright.
Top of meaty thigh, thickest muscle on a human body
.
Strong broad shoulders
Their flowing tunics
Leap out with all of your weapons
.
Other deathless gods
.
It is OK to tease, joke, other people
Obey, obeyed.
Obey your wife?
Conflict, which devours human hearts
.
A lion killing a brave Red Bull
.
Go in search of evil 
Would you send your first born son, you’re only son, to war and potentially die? Obviously not!
.
Be strong, brave, and urge the others On!
Death veiled his eyes and blocked his nose

Pull out both the weapon and the life
.
Just throw up the peace sign 
Peace!
.
Peace, be peaceful, when it comes to potentially life for death, or bodily harm.
War should be seen as more of a metaphorical thing… In the context of art ideas etc.?
Once again, no guns or knives or weapons etc.
Deweaponize men & society.
Also, it does seem that at this point, war, warfare should only be done in the digital realm, in which there is no deaths for human beings or bodies.
All death, is bad death.
.
Deep distress, did not protect him
.
Strike, attack… Maybe this is the whole ethos of one rep Max?
One rep Max lifting, not “powerlifting“.
.
.
Sarpedon, the son of Zeus was killed
His winged words 
Unearthly screams
Sinister night
Achilles, breaker of men.
Deep grief
Cruel darkness
**
Don’t trust women

.
The only woman you should care about is your wife 
Not even your own mother! Let alone your grandmother
.
Do what is best for your own wife and kit
Taunt
Foal, folly
War needs hands
There is no time to talk we must fight
fight?
.
Black hole, avoid black holes or tar tar pits
it’s OK to make people feel uncomfortable 
.
Fill your ears with beeswax
On the front lines yourself
What are we not permitted to do in today’s world? To strike. 
I’ll give you some examples:
First, everything is about defense, self-defense etc. For example… You can never strike first, or hit first.
For example, in Star Wars… The whole issue with Han Solo was,
Are you allowed to shoot first?
So for example… Let us say that if you think about the art of war, Machiavelli’s ethics – according to them… Striking first can be virtuous, and the smart strategy… If you knew with 100% foresight that if you waited too long, the other person would shoot you. 
For example, let us think about the ethics of guns and gun defense. Let us say that once again, you knew with 100% certainty that in 30 seconds, the guy would pop out a pistol and shoot and kill you. And let us assume that you also have a pistol Concealed… And you have an option to shoot and kill or maim him first…  or at least shoot him in the balls. Before he kills you.
Now the issue here is when you are in such a high adrenaline situation… Human actors we are not rational. And this is where you hear all the stories of these people first shooting an African-American kid, who just had a Coca-Cola can in his pocket or whatever.
Now, some issues:  
First, anybody who owns a gun, a “self-defense†weapon… Truth be told, I think they are secretly itching to use it. They’re almost looking for a reason to use it.
I’ll give example… Let us see that you are the police, and you live in Irvine California. Come on… You’re just looking for a reason to use all of your high-powered weaponry.
I’ll give you another ridiculous example… A few weeks ago, I was in Santa Monica… And I saw this maybe 16-year-old Latino kid was sagging pants, running away from about a highly muscular 6 foot two police officer, and after they tackled the kid, handcuff him, there’s about five or six police SUVs that pull up?
I suppose in Santa Monica… It is not very dangerous. I’m not sure if this kid pickpocketed somebody, or did something… But, the response was very overcompensation, unnecessarily heavy-handed.
OK… Some unorthodox ethics.
First, I think there needs to be engaged thing. Like for example if the kids are young teenagers, or obviously maybe sub 21 years old… You give them a free pass.
I think the issue is it looks like the man is in his 30s or 40s… This is where you give them no mercy?
I think men do not understand is that no death of their child is ever justified… Even if the child was in the wrong.
I think the issue is with pistols, firearms, and 9 mm guns, Glocks, whatever…  there is an asymmetry. For example you could be a 99 pound skinny fat loser, with even a basic pistol, and immediately killed somebody who is 6 foot two and looks like Thor. Assuming that the other guy doesn’t have a gun.
And I suppose the difficult ethics here is it is kind of impossible to ascertain whether someone else has a gun or not.
Now some issues:
First, there are some people who have guns, some people who do not have guns. How do you know? 
First, think about the neighborhood. If you’re driving through Compton, Watts, Inglewood, South Central LA… Assume that everyone has a gun. However, if you are in Beverly Hills, Brentwood or even Culver City… Assume that nobody has a gun.
At least in America, typically rich people do not really carry guns or self-defense weapons. I find that from a sociological perspective, gun owners tend to be from lower class, middle America, strange people in the Midwest, who “homesteadâ€, listen to Fox News, and too much Donald Trump rhetoric. Typically liberals, left-leaning people, rich people… Don’t even think about guns? I suppose the nuances if you are rich “white-sican†in Mexico City driving the convertible Lamborghini… They probably have a self-defense gun.
I suppose the upside of a Japan or South Korea is that nobody has guns, I think even knives are rare.
The upside is whenever you watch these South Korean or maybe even Japanese yakuza movies… Typically they don’t have guns, but samurai blades and swords, sashimi blades etc. 
I would actually prefer a world in which we assumed with 100% certainty that nobody had any guns, knives, and weapons, and if you ever gone to an argument with somebody, it would come down to like a UFC, MMA, boxing style thing…
You solve it, with your fists, your legs, your naked body.
Theory… Maybe it was all about confirming that the other person did not have a weapon on them?
Once again… I think that ethical thing here is–
Weapons are unethical because they give you an asymmetric advantage, whereas defense or armor is virtuous.
 For example, don’t be a pussy and try to get yourself a gun. My better suggestion is if you really are concerned about your life… Buy a bulletproof vest or Kevlar equipment instead.
I think one of the great things I am very proud about my 60 pound weight vest, is that certainly at least in a fistfight… I will win. If somebody tries to punch me in the chest, it will likely shatter their hand. 
Also… It might repel, or at least reduce the impact, if somebody shot me with a gun, assuming that the bullet did not go through the in-between areas?
Funny enough, if you were a drug dealer or you lived in a very dangerous neighborhood or whatever, funny enough it seems that cyber truck might be your best bet. It might be the only mainstream bulletproof armored vehicle?
I mean the real optimal strategy is just don’t live in a dangerous area. But then again at the same time, you don’t want to live in Irvine California. The castrated society. 
I think we men… Perhaps what we men desire is to become a champion, some sort of hero. 
But wouldn’t it be a better idea that you become a hero, just with your fists, and your body? And your legs?
I’ve met a lot of people who play American football, or played American football, and 0% of the time they ever think or wonder whether I played or not. I think it is just a low-key racism… We assume that Asian guys are weak and effeminate, and we never see Asian American guys in the NFL, and as a consequence… we think of Asian guys as the weaker race.
Whenever somebody calls me Bruce Lee, I appreciate it and take the compliment, but the same time, I get a bit annoyed… Because truth be told, I don’t really care for Bruce Lee at all. I didn’t grow up to Bruce Lee movies, I grew up to Arnold Schwarzenegger! I grew up to Terminator, Rocky, Rambo etc.
The problem with Bruce Lee was he was too skinny, not enough muscle. And it seems that Bruce Lee… he was more of a magician, witchcraft and voodoo.
My critique about martial arts, karate, stuff like that is if he comes almost like a secret weapon, some sort of strange mistresses, rather than raw, pure power, pure muscle.
For me… I would prefer to look like Arnold in his prime. Yet, he was on steroids and openly admits it.
Therefore, the biggest issue we have been is here or all these guys on steroids, propagating a false vision of reality, and you have all these young impressionable teenagers, striving to become like Arnold?
I think the strange thought is we are always taught that to become someone else’s virtuous, and to become yourself is viceful or a sin?
For example, we are always told to become like Jesus… But why is Ever says that you should become yourself? We are taught that being evil, bad,, but don’t realize that Jesus was a bad ass… And often aggressive, like when he busted out the whips, and whipped out the oxen from the Jewish temple, and said out loud “ do not sell wares inside my father home!â€
Pontius Pilate was a real historical figure, and Jesus of Nazareth also was. I told you with 100%  certainty that in fact, Jesus was a real human being, a real man, 100% real… A real flesh bound, physics space, biological human being man… That is assume that all the stories in his miracles were metaphors. In fact, the good thing about being Roman Catholic is that we believe in metaphor, not literals– this is where the protestants and “sola scriptura†get it wrong.
Even Catholics, we think of God as more of a metaphorical figure. Not a literal one.
We also look at the miracles of Jesus Christ, Jesus of Nazareth, Almost from a more secular perspective. Also con substantiation, Eucharist, tribute told everyone knows it is a bit of a metaphor. I don’t think anyone really really really 100% think that when the priest rings the bell, and puts his hands over the unleavened bread, that is actually really does literally and physically become the flesh of Jesus Christ. Any stories about the Eucharist turning into blood, do not trust people without sound judgment.
Anyways, I think Jesus Christ is an interesting individual because his morals and ethics were so radical and revolutionary at the time — to turn the other cheek  a bit of a nonsense.   But my suspicion; if we think about Jesus like Gondi or whatever… How much of Jesus is teaching were based on the fact that he did not have an army that could overtake the Roman Empire, if we magically gave Jesus 1000,000 centurions, would he have behaved or acted differently?
The reason why it is not good to watch any Disney movies, or Marvel movies, Batman or Superman, or the like is most of these stories and concepts, alter ego etc.… Either come from Stan Lee, or other guys who were either raised Jewish American, protestant, Christian, certainly American… Which has strange notions of a savior complex.
For example even the movie at this, saying that you are “the special‖ if you think about all traditional movies in America they are all seeking a Jesus figure, like Neo from the matrix, etc. And let us not forget that Warner brothers discovery which owns all the intellectual property of the matrix and beyond,  they just keep rehashing the same concept, ad Infinitum.
I think humans, we have a difficult time dealing with complexity, we want simple straightforward answers. Poison example, if you’re Christian in America, the goal is to be like Jesus. But why would you be like Jesus and you own a gun?  Would Jesus have owned a gun? No! He didn’t even have armor!
I’ll give you an example… John Wick. Everyone universally likes John Wick, even women, even people who are anti-guns. Even I love John Wick!
Yet, in real life,  I am very anti-gun. Not out of any sort of virtue signaling, but rather, I just really think it is the cowardly, weakling, pussy strategy. I really think that the true manly thing to do is once again, fist fights. Not even knives, or having a nail file.
Maybe this is where boxing, Wrestling, or MMA, the UFC is virtuous.? Even American football? Or rugby? But once again… The reason why I advise against any sort of high school or collegiate sports is that there will be at least one or two guys on steroids, without anyone knowing it. or they having low-key steroids, which is “cortisol shots “, to “heal†“injuries†. Anabolic steroids, are often prescribed to heal an injury, and this is how they are fake Weaponized.
Your favorite CrossFitter, your favorite  calisthenics guy, your favorite water polo player, whatever. Assume that 100% of people are on steroids, whether real or fake steroids.
I think I figured it out… The whole issue is about records, world records, or personal records. If there is a drive to shatter records,  there will eventually be some sort of steroid or fake steroid use. Because biologically, if you want somebody to deadlift 2000 pounds or whatever,  I doubt it is physically possible, unless you inject your asshole with all the steroids on the planet.
So whenever you’re walking around you see a dude who is much buffer than you, assume that he is just on steroids. And as a consequence you don’t really complain about it or feel bad about it… If they want to become impotent and not have kids and have their balls become marshmallows, so be it.
So I think the critical issue here is once again… Everyone is about show, performance, the real world etc.
However, if we think about Achilles and the like…  it wasn’t about competition that they sought, simply, revenge. 
A simple way not to get scammed in Los Angeles: assume that everyone is lying and bullshitting. Because you might be  right, 1 out of 99 times, and it might save your life? 
So also I thought about life… To play defense — is to be maximally critical and suspicious of everybody. But obviously do it in the spirit of Jesus! 
Trust nobody who is employed, doesn’t matter if they are employed by YouTube, Apple Amazon Facebook etc.… As long as they are not self owned, a sole proprietor, or independently wealthy… They cannot really speak their mind. 
Also, the reason you should not trust people on YouTube is that as long as they get advertising revenue from the videos, they also cannot really speak their minds.
So I’m starting to think… Rather than thinking about goals, life goals etc.… Perhaps a better way to approach life is to think about your life like a telos, a certain purpose life direction etc. 
For example… It was my life goal to atlas lift 1000 pounds. But now that I achieved it and hit it, then… Now, I no longer have a drive to do this anymore?
And also truth be told, I’m a type of person that I want to please everybody. I think I get it from my mom.
But anyways, trying to please other people, or to live a life in which you never offend anybody… Not possible. Especially if you want to be successful.
You can’t cheat physics? Or biology?
Lords could cheat peasants in various ways during the feudal era, often taking advantage of their power and the peasants’ dependence. Here are some common methods:
In these ways, lords could exploit their power to cheat peasants, who had little recourse or ability to challenge the injustice.
The feudal system was a way of organizing society that existed in Europe during the Middle Ages (around the 9th to 15th centuries). It was based on a hierarchy, with kings and nobles at the top and peasants at the bottom. Here’s how it worked:
- King: At the top of the system was the king, who owned all the land in the country. The king couldn’t manage it all, so he divided it into large sections and gave pieces of it to nobles in exchange for loyalty and military support.
- Nobles/Lords: These were wealthy landowners, like barons or dukes, who controlled large areas of land. In return for the land, they promised to support the king, especially by providing knights and soldiers.
- Knights: Below the lords were the knights. They were warriors who served the nobles and protected their land. In return, knights were often given smaller pieces of land, called fiefs.
- Peasants/Serfs: At the bottom were the peasants or serfs. They worked the land and produced food. In return, they were allowed to live on the land and received protection from the knights. However, they had to give a portion of their crops to the lord as rent.
In short, the feudal system was based on an exchange of land for loyalty, protection, and services, with everyone having a specific role in society.
Lords and crown officials .,.escheat people to claim property.
You can’t cheat Bitcoin
escheat (es+cheat)— landowner dies without heir, goes back to the lord.
eachete— escheoir, to fall out, happen by chance,,, excadere
The word “cheat” has an interesting etymology and historical evolution. It originates from a much older and more formal term but has since come to refer to dishonesty and trickery.
Etymology:
- From “Escheat”: The word “cheat” has its roots in the Middle English word eschete (from Anglo-French eschete), which originally referred to property or assets that reverted to a lord or the crown when a person died without heirs. The word eschete itself came from the Old French verb escheoir, meaning “to fall out” or “happen by chance,” which derived from the Latin excadere, meaning “to fall out.”
- Legal and Feudal Meaning: In the feudal system, escheat was a legal term referring to the process where land would revert to the lord or the crown if a landholder died without a legal heir. It was essentially a claim to property when there was no one left to inherit it. The term escheat was primarily used in a formal, legal sense, with no negative connotation.
Evolution into “Cheat”:
- Corruption of the Term: Over time, the term escheat began to be associated with fraud and wrongful appropriation, particularly as some lords or crown officials used their rights of escheat to unjustly claim property. By the 15th century, this misuse led to the word being applied more broadly to describe any kind of swindle or trickery. The term chete or cheat emerged from this context, referring to fraud or dishonest behavior.
- 1600s (Modern Meaning Solidified): By the 17th century, “cheat” was fully established in the English language as a word for deceitful actions, trickery, or dishonesty, especially in contexts where someone takes unfair advantage of another person. The legal connection to escheat had largely disappeared, and the word “cheat” began to be used in a much broader sense, covering various forms of fraud, scams, and dishonesty.
Contemporary Use:
Today, “cheat” refers to:
- Deceiving or tricking someone, often for personal gain.
- Breaking rules in games, sports, or exams to gain an advantage.
- Illegitimately accessing or bypassing systems, especially in computing or video games, to exploit vulnerabilities or shortcuts.
Thus, the term has evolved from a feudal legal process to describe dishonest actions in everyday life. The shift from its formal, neutral origins to a negative connotation shows how language changes with cultural and societal shifts over time.
The word “radical” comes from the Latin word radix, meaning “root.” Its earliest use in English dates back to the late 14th century, when it referred to something “relating to a root or origin.” Over time, the term’s meaning has evolved significantly, both in its literal and metaphorical senses.
Early Uses:
- Botanical and Medical Origins: The original use of “radical” was quite literal, often describing something fundamental or relating to the root, such as in botany (the root of a plant) or medicine (addressing the root cause of an illness). For example, in medicine, “radical” treatments were those that targeted the root of a disease, aiming for a complete cure.
Political and Social Shift:
- 18th Century (Political Sense): In the late 18th century, “radical” began to acquire its modern connotation of advocating for thorough and sweeping change. The term was used to describe political reformers in Britain who sought significant changes to the parliamentary system. These reformers were considered “radicals” because they wanted to address the root causes of social and political issues rather than just dealing with surface-level reforms.
- 19th Century (Political Movements): The term gained popularity throughout the 19th century, particularly during the Radical Reform Movement in Britain, which advocated for voting rights, more representative governance, and social reforms. Over time, “radical” came to describe any person or group pushing for profound political, social, or economic change.
20th Century and Beyond:
- Radical in Political Ideology: In the 20th century, “radical” became more commonly associated with left-wing political movements, though it can refer to any ideology that seeks to challenge the status quo. In contexts ranging from communism to anarchism, the term was used to describe individuals who aimed to overthrow existing power structures and establish new systems based on different values.
- Scientific Uses: In chemistry, “radical” also refers to a group of atoms acting together as a single unit, especially in reactions, where free radicals are highly reactive and fundamental to chemical processes.
Modern Usage:
Today, “radical” can carry both positive and negative connotations. It can be used to describe someone with extreme political views, someone who wants to address fundamental issues, or even someone whose ideas are innovative and unconventional.
The word retains its core meaning of being deeply transformative, whether referring to root causes, fundamental changes, or extreme ideas.
The really radical idea?
radix, root?
Problem solving
The cult of non-reality?
Just look at the players in real life,,, so weak
Too many fucking nerds?
Also —
It puts you in a Procrustean bed of “moves†and the laws and physics of the game, *NOT* reality?

Title: The Crypto Siege
Concept:
In a future where nations wage war through blockchain technology and digital assets, two powerful crypto-empires, the Trojans and the Greeks, engage in a high-tech conflict over control of the world’s most valuable digital treasure: The Iliad Protocol. This ancient, secure code, hidden within the first Bitcoin blockchain, grants control over the global economy, energy grids, and weapons systems.The Greeks, led by their ruthless hacker-commander Achilles, launch a brutal cyber-assault on the fortified network of Troy, a stronghold known for its unbreakable cryptography. However, Troy’s king, Priam, and his son Hector, command an army of digital warriors and defensive algorithms, determined to protect the Iliad Protocol.
As the two factions engage in a series of increasingly sophisticated cyber-skirmishes, martial combat spills into the physical world. Hackers fight from behind firewalls, drones and crypto-powered AIs clash in battlefields, and a final siege on Troy takes place—both in cyberspace and in reality.
The fate of digital sovereignty, freedom, and control over the future of wealth is at stake, but it will all come down to the untraceable nature of Achilles’ personal encryption key—the key that might turn the tides of the war.
Economics and warfare?
Ugly people hate the beautiful and want to tear them down?
To strike, dhwel, dwel— to fight, or to strike.
Yes, the word πόλεμος (pólemos), meaning “war,” is indeed used in Homer’s Iliad, which is one of the most famous epic poems about war in ancient Greek literature. The Iliad is centered on the events of the Trojan War, and as such, the term pólemos appears throughout the text to describe the overarching theme of battle and conflict between the Greeks and Trojans.
However, Homer often uses other related terms to describe battle, combat, and strife. For example:
- μάχη (machÄ“) means “battle” or “fight,” and is frequently used when referring to individual combat or a specific clash within the larger context of war.
- ἄÏης (arÄ“s) refers to warlike strife, and it is also the name of the Greek god of war, Ares.
In the Iliad, pólemos specifically refers to the larger concept of war as a whole, while other words like machē or ponos (toil or labor) are used to describe specific acts or events within the war.
Example from the Iliad:
In Book 6 of the Iliad, pólemos is used when Hector, the Trojan prince, speaks of the unending war that keeps him from staying with his family, emphasizing the relentless nature of the conflict.
Thus, pólemos is not only present but central to the narrative of the Iliad, framing the entire story around the destructive and all-encompassing nature of war.
The Greek equivalent of the Latin word “bellum” (meaning “war”) is “πόλεμος” (pólemos).
Etymology of Pólemos:
- Pólemos (πόλεμος) means “war” or “battle” in Ancient Greek and has deep roots in Indo-European languages. Its etymological origin is connected to the Proto-Indo-European root pelÉ™, meaning “to drive, thrust, or strike,” which gives it a similar sense of conflict and combat as the Latin bellum.
Usage in Greek:
- In Greek mythology, Pólemos was personified as a minor deity representing war, often mentioned alongside the more well-known god of war, Ares (ΆÏης).
- The term pólemos was frequently used in both historical and philosophical contexts. For example, the historian Thucydides wrote extensively about war in his account of the Peloponnesian War (Πόλεμος τῶν Πελοποννησίων), and Greek philosophers like Heraclitus famously said, “War (pólemos) is the father of all things,” indicating the central role of conflict in the cosmos and human society.
Related Terms:
- Polemic: From Greek polemikos (πολεμικός), meaning “warlike” or “hostile,” which in modern usage refers to a strong verbal or written argument.
- Hoplite: A heavily armed foot soldier in Ancient Greece, deriving from hoplon (ὅπλον), meaning “weapon,” which is closely associated with war.
In Greek culture, pólemos was as essential to their worldview as bellum was to the Romans, and it has similarly left its mark on modern language, particularly in terms relating to conflict and debate.
The word “bellum” in Latin means “war” and has an interesting etymological history. Its root, development, and usage reflect both linguistic evolution and the cultural importance of war in ancient times.
Etymology of Bellum:
- Proto-Indo-European Roots: The word bellum is thought to originate from the Proto-Indo-European root dʰwel- or dwel-, which means “to strike” or “fight.” This root emphasizes the concept of physical conflict or violent engagement, which underpins the word’s meaning in Latin.
- Shift in Form: While bellum is the Latin word for war, it is likely a later, softened form of the older Latin term duellum. Duellum is an archaic word that also means “war,” but it bears a closer resemblance to the Indo-European root dwel- (to strike). Over time, duellum evolved into bellum as the sounds changed for reasons of linguistic ease, a process known as disassimilation, where similar sounds become less alike in order to facilitate pronunciation.
- Historical Usage in Latin:
- Bellum was commonly used in the classical Latin of Ancient Rome, where war played a central role in society, governance, and expansion.
- Latin phrases such as bellum civile (civil war), bellum iustum (just war), and bellum gerere (to wage war) illustrate how central the concept of war was in Roman law, politics, and philosophy.
- Cicero, for example, often used the term in his writings on war and peace, discussing bellum as both a legal and moral concept.
Related Words:
Several Latin terms derived from bellum continue to have significance in modern languages:
- Bellicose: From Latin bellicosus, meaning “warlike” or “inclined to fight.”
- Belligerent: From Latin belliger, meaning “waging war” (from bellum + gerere, to wage).
- Rebellion: From the Latin rebellio, meaning “renewal of war” or “uprising” (from re- + bellum).
Influence on Modern Languages:
The word bellum has influenced various modern languages, particularly through legal and military terms derived from Latin. English, for instance, inherited many terms related to war from Latin via Old French, such as:
- Rebellion: From rebellio (as mentioned earlier).
- Belligerent: Through Middle French, meaning someone who is engaged in or ready for conflict.
Historical Context:
- In Roman culture, bellum was not only a practical concept but also a legal and moral one. The Romans had complex ideas about bellum iustum (just war), debating when wars were justified, how they should be conducted, and what the moral implications were.
- The word also featured prominently in Roman mythology and history, with Mars, the god of war, playing a central role in their pantheon. Military conflict and expansion were central to Roman identity, and terms related to war permeated both their language and their legal system.
Summary:
- Bellum originates from the Proto-Indo-European root dwel-, meaning “to strike” or “fight.”
- It is derived from an older form duellum, which later evolved into bellum due to linguistic shifts.
- The word played a central role in Roman culture, reflecting their focus on military conquest and the legalities of warfare.
- It has influenced many modern words related to war and conflict, particularly in English and other European languages.
The evolution of bellum reflects both its linguistic history and the centrality of warfare in Roman society and thought.
Bella, bellum— war!
The Latin words bellum (meaning “war”) and bella (meaning “wars” in the plural form) are directly connected as different grammatical forms of the same root word.
Connection Between Bellum and Bella:
- Bellum is the singular form of the Latin word for “war.”
- Bella is the plural form of bellum, meaning “wars.”
Latin nouns follow specific declension patterns, and bellum is a neuter noun in the second declension. Here’s a breakdown of the forms for bellum (war):
- Singular: bellum – war
- Plural: bella – wars
In Latin, nouns change their endings to indicate number (singular or plural) and case (the grammatical role the noun plays in the sentence). For bellum (second-declension neuter noun), the plural form is bella.
Examples of Usage:
- Bellum civile: Civil war (singular)
- Bella civilia: Civil wars (plural)
To clarify, this is entirely separate from the earlier discussion about bellus (meaning “beautiful”) and its derivatives. Despite the similar appearance of bellum and bella (wars) and bellus (beautiful), these words are etymologically unrelated.
In summary, bellum (war) and bella (wars) are grammatically related as singular and plural forms of the same Latin word for war.
Now people think that being antisocial and aloof is “cool�
The term “cool,” used in the sense of being socially desirable, calm, or fashionable, has an interesting evolution from its literal meaning of temperature to its modern slang usage. Here’s how it developed:
Etymology and Early Meaning:
The word “cool” comes from Old English col, meaning “moderately cold,” and has Germanic roots (Old High German kuoli). Its primary meaning referred to temperature, describing something neither hot nor warm but pleasantly cold.
Early Figurative Use (Pre-20th Century):
Even as early as the 14th century, “cool” began to be used metaphorically to describe emotional restraint or calmness. For example, people would describe someone who was “cool-headed” as being calm, composed, and unemotional. By the 17th century, “cool” could also describe someone emotionally detached or aloof, especially in situations that would typically provoke a reaction.
The Jazz Era (1930s–1940s):
The slang usage of “cool” as we understand it today began to develop in the early 20th century, particularly in African American communities. It was popularized in jazz culture in the 1940s, where “cool” came to signify a relaxed, composed demeanor. Musicians, especially in the bebop and later cool jazz movements, embodied this quality—remaining outwardly calm and unflustered, even while performing complex, fast-paced music. Jazz musicians like Lester Young are often credited with helping to spread this usage of “cool” as a sign of self-possession and understated confidence.
1950s and Beat Generation:
The term “cool” gained wider cultural significance in the 1950s, during which it became a core value of the burgeoning youth culture and the Beat Generation. Figures like Jack Kerouac and James Dean embodied the “cool” attitude: rebellious, disaffected, and anti-establishment, yet effortlessly confident and self-controlled. The idea of “cool” came to represent not only fashion or style but a way of being that rejected mainstream norms and embraced individualism.
1960s Counterculture:
In the 1960s, “cool” was further amplified by the counterculture movement, where it came to describe not just an attitude but a whole lifestyle. Being “cool” meant being aligned with progressive values, rejecting conformity, and embracing freedom, creativity, and experimentation. It also came to be associated with anti-authoritarianism, as the “cool” person was seen as someone who didn’t follow society’s rules and expectations.
1970s–1990s: Mainstream Popularity:
By the 1970s, “cool” was firmly established in mainstream American English, and it began to spread globally. In this period, the term expanded beyond its original countercultural associations and came to describe anything or anyone considered stylish, desirable, or trendy. It was used to describe not just people, but also objects, ideas, music, and fashion.
Modern Usage:
Today, “cool” remains one of the most widely recognized and used slang terms in English, though its meaning can vary depending on context. It continues to convey the idea of something fashionable or impressive, but it can also describe a calm or collected demeanor in stressful situations. The term has remained remarkably resilient, adapting to different generations and subcultures while retaining its core idea of effortless appeal and desirability.
Summary:
- Origin: Old English col (meaning moderately cold).
- Early Figurative Use: Describing emotional restraint and calmness.
- Jazz Era: Popularized in African American jazz culture to describe a calm, confident attitude.
- 1950s–1960s: Became a symbol of rebellion and individuality, popularized by the Beat Generation and counterculture movements.
- Modern Usage: Broadly applied to describe anything socially desirable, stylish, or impressive, as well as calmness and composure.
The evolution of “cool” from a word about temperature to a defining trait of social approval shows how language can shift dramatically over time, reflecting changes in cultural values and attitudes.
lama: crippled, weak limbed, lem- to crush or cripple
lame —
weak, soft, tired, break (hlemh)
Etymology and history as in not cool:
How did it evolve
The slang use of “lame” evolved through a process of metaphorical extension from its original meaning, which referred to physical impairment. Here’s a look at how that evolution took place:
1. Original Meaning (Pre-20th Century):
The word “lame” originally meant physically crippled, weak, or impaired in movement, and it was used to describe people or animals with a disability affecting their mobility. This meaning goes back to Old English (lama) and similar terms in Germanic languages.
2. Figurative Use (Early 20th Century):
As often happens in language, the word began to take on metaphorical meanings. By the early 20th century, “lame” was not only used for physical disability but also for situations or things that were seen as metaphorically “crippled” or lacking in some way. For instance, someone might describe an excuse, plan, or performance as “lame” if it was inadequate or insufficient.
3. Youth and Counterculture (1940s–1950s):
By the 1940s and 1950s, “lame” started appearing in American youth culture, particularly in teenage slang, to describe people who were socially inept, boring, or not “with it.” As post-war youth cultures grew, especially with the rise of rock ‘n’ roll and teen rebellion, the term began to apply more broadly to people or things that were perceived as unexciting or old-fashioned.
4. Pejorative Sense of Social Inadequacy (1960s–1980s):
During the 1960s and 1970s, “lame” became more firmly entrenched in popular culture to mean uncool, uninteresting, or socially awkward. It was used to describe people who didn’t fit into the dominant youth subcultures of the time, such as hippies, punks, or later on, skaters and hip-hop enthusiasts. This shift in meaning coincided with the broader cultural emphasis on “coolness” as a social value, and “lame” was the opposite of that.
5. Mainstream Usage (1990s–2000s):
By the 1990s, “lame” had become a common part of everyday speech, losing some of its strong pejorative tone and being used more casually to describe anything uncool, unimpressive, or disappointing. Its usage expanded to describe not only people but also ideas, behaviors, and objects.
6. Modern Usage:
Today, “lame” continues to be used in a casual sense to describe anything lacking in excitement, sophistication, or interest. However, its usage has declined somewhat as newer slang terms have emerged, and it can sometimes feel dated to younger generations. Additionally, because of increasing awareness around ableist language, the use of “lame” in its figurative sense has drawn criticism, as its origins in disability are seen as insensitive or inappropriate.
In summary, the evolution of “lame” from a term referring to physical impairment to a slang term for social or cultural inadequacy followed a typical path of figurative extension, driven largely by youth culture and changing societal values around what was considered “cool” or desirable.
The word “lame,” used in the sense of “not cool” or “uncool,” has a more recent history and differs from its more traditional meanings related to physical impairment.
Etymology:
The slang usage of “lame” originated in American English in the mid-20th century. It comes from the older definition of “lame,” which historically meant “crippled” or “disabled in movement,” derived from Old English lama, meaning “crippled, weak-limbed.” This word, in turn, comes from the Proto-Germanic lama- and the Proto-Indo-European lem-, meaning “to crush” or “cripple.”
Slang Development:
By the 1940s and 1950s, “lame” began to be used in a figurative, pejorative sense, implying something or someone was weak, inadequate, or disappointing. This negative connotation was eventually extended to describe anything uncool, socially inept, or undesirable. It was popularized in American youth culture, especially in the post-war era when slang was rapidly evolving.
The slang usage became more prominent in the latter half of the 20th century, particularly in the 1970s and 1980s, and is still widely understood today to describe someone or something as lacking style, excitement, or sophistication.
1,000 pound rack pull or deadlift?
Pretty cool!
What is super interesting and fascinating about car design is that it is ever evolving and changing… But human proportions, the human physique… Doesn’t seem to change too much?
The Farnese Hercules is a famous ancient Roman marble statue, one of the most renowned sculptures of antiquity. It depicts the mythological hero Hercules, standing in a moment of rest after completing his Twelve Labors. The figure is massive and muscular, embodying the ideals of strength and heroic perseverance.
Here are some notable aspects:
- Pose: Hercules leans on his club, which is draped with the skin of the Nemean lion (one of his Labors), with his right hand resting on the club and his head slightly bowed.
- Musculature: The sculpture is celebrated for its detailed and exaggerated musculature, representing idealized male strength.
- Symbolism: In his left hand, Hercules holds the golden apples of the Hesperides behind his back, symbolizing the completion of one of his final Labors.
Originally created in bronze by the Greek sculptor Lysippos in the 4th century BC, the marble copy was found in the Baths of Caracalla in Rome and is currently displayed in the Naples National Archaeological Museum. The Farnese Hercules greatly influenced Renaissance and Baroque art, admired for its anatomical perfection and scale.
In the context of Honda, “SI” stands for “Sport Injected.” It is a designation used for some of their sportier, performance-oriented models. The SI badge is commonly associated with Honda’s Civic lineup, indicating a higher-performance version of the car, typically with enhanced engine power, suspension, and other features aimed at improving driving dynamics.
BULLETPROOF SHOULDER TRAINING:
Being naive is a virtue!














Becoming the uber-street photographer:

ERIC KIM CHATGPT BOTS



Master street photography with STREET PHOTOGRAPHY STARTER KIT.

If you’re new to street photography, start here:


Push yourself out of your comfort zone with STREET NOTES: Mobile Edition.
STREET NOTES PAPER EDITION ON AMAZON >
Timeless wisdom from the masters of street photography.
Get started in street photography:
See all articles to conquer your fears >
Take your street photography to the next level:
Find deeper meaning in your street photography:
Learn how to shoot on the streets:
See all street photography tips and techniques >
In-depth guides on street photography:
The best equipment for street photography:
“He without a past has no future.”
Start here:
Classics never die:
Distilled information on street photography:
For more resources on photography, Start Here >
So ever since I was 16 years old, 18 years old, in college etc.… And beyond, I’ve always been really fascinated about this notion of “lifestyle‖ to me it is a pragmatic thing, a combination of pragmatics; being self-employed, being your own boss– funny enough, the notion of “entrepreneurâ€, wasn’t really even mainstream yet… 
Funny enough I still remember this notion of not wanting to “work for the man†ever since I was a highschooler, and the dream was… To get a high paying job like being a doctor lawyer, and this grand vision and making $100 an hour, just working for a few hours and then just chilling for the rest of the time.
It was quite formative to me, just make a bunch of money for the sake of making a bunch of money was never the goal. And also the desire to purchase property or home or whatever it was also not a virtue or concept instilled on me growing up. We always rented our whole lives… And on average we moved every one to two years, and therefore a consequence, the notion of warning a house wasn’t even a concept.
Also, still in high school, my sense of self pride was strong. I was so insanely proud, 1 million X proud that I was maybe the only person in my whole high school, or anyone I knew… Who actually worked hard for his own money, and bought his own first car! at the age of 15… I think paying $1000 or $1200 for my first car… A very sturdy and reliable 1991 Nissan Sentra SE — a four-door sedan car, five speed manual transmission. Pretty low miles, maybe $100,000 or so? Getting it from Kevin, one of my mom‘s clients at her old sushi restaurant, who was an autumn mechanic in Oakland. 
Anyways I had so much extreme pride to myself in my car. For a kid, the pride and joy of earning your own money and buying the thing you desire, was by far the most valuable thing. Not only that, but the pride that my car was a manual transmission… A five speed, and I had the ability to learn how to drive stick shift myself. Good memories of learning how to drive stick from my uncle Enzo, in the old Navy base in Alameda.
Anyways, I think maybe the problem in today’s world is we lack pride, self pride? And we tend to metric Kate our valor and self-worth via numbers, through 12 education to college and beyond.
For example, in school it is all about the grades, then your GPA, then your test scores, then the rank of your university, then the prestige of your job, then your salary, ones and zeros etc.
And then… When you become an adult, older maybe with kids or whatever, then becomes about your home price. Whether your house is worth 3.1 or $3.2 million, friends and family and random guests who check the proper value of your home on Zillow after the fact, rather than asking you directly.
Anyways, the reason why metrics are a poor measure of oneself is that if you are an 800 pound obese man, you cannot walk, but you are a trillionaire… And you own all the Rolls-Royce and Ferraris on the planet does that make you virtuous? I say no.
Things to be desired
Also, as a man… What is it that we desire?
For example, I think one of the critical issues here is that men, it looks like there is something I call the Shorty guy syndrome – that Shorty guys will always feel inept, inferior… Because obviously you’re standing and valor is based on your height.
The reason why this is not fair is that it is mostly genetic, and maybe what you were fed as a kid.
For example… My insane gratitude that I was born in America, and raised on eating nothing but meat, Galbi Korean short ribs, and rice. I didn’t eat a single vegetable until I went to college.
As a consequence, I became very very tall, I’m around 5 foot 11… And I think I’m 182 cm tall.
Apparently in America, the average height of a man is only 5 foot seven, 5 foot eight? Even most of the famous actors and celebrities see on television, even Mark Wahlberg I think is only 5‘7“ tall? 
As a consequence, a lot of these Shorty guys end up taking steroids are doing weird stuff to increase the size of their muscles, their biceps, the width of their body, because this is something that could actually be changed with steroids, lifting weights etc. However, you’ve been if you take all the steroids on the planet, and even if you’re a trillionaire, you cannot magically become 5 foot 7 to 6 foot 2.
Even something very shocking… I ChatGPT the height of Donald Trump, and I think he is 6 foot two? 
The reason why I think it is important and critical to search the height of men, whether politicians, fitness celebrities, influencers whatever… Is that whether you like it or not, the tall guys will end up typically have more self-confidence, whereas the short guys will always feel inferior somehow.
Fortunately for myself… I’ve never been insecure about my height. I always knew that I was tall, obviously there were guys were taller than me… But I know that I was still in the “tall†category. And in high school in college… I certainly knew the guys who were short, or on the shorter end.
I think Plato once said, it is impossible for there to be a beautiful small or short woman. She is very very small and short.
I think there is a genetic biased that we will always prefer taller individuals. In fact, why is it that all the super models are about 5 foot 10 and beyond? Because tallness is a virtue that we all desire!
And also apparently it is pretty common for there to be successful rich Shorty guys who want to marry 6 foot tall supermodels, because they desire their next generation of children to be a lot taller than them. Strategy. As a consequence, the optimization for men is to become maximally rich and successful, and attract the most beautiful tallest babe, and have Beautiful children with them.
George Clooney is a loser, nobody cares about him anymore.
I think the big issue here is that a lot of people, who watched too much media, movies TV shows whatever… End up getting these strange new virtues or desired outcomes.
For example, there is a strange notion of being the most interesting man alive, but, all you do is drink whiskey and hard liquor, brought out your beard, and have sex with beautiful younger babes?
Let us be frank ,,, any man, who is on his deathbed at the age of 90, no children no legacy no nothing… We always end up regretting it.
Let it say that you die, with your 20 bitcoin or so… Can you leave it behind to your dog? Obviously not.
Even the notion of creating your own charitable foundation seems a little bit superficial… I would put trust in any random administrative person to figure out how to allocate funds, seems that 80% of the funds of a foundation  it’s just staff overhead… Paying the staff in office space of these administrators, who just click around and push around paper.
So a very simple thought for us men… Have at least one kid before you die. It could be a girl or a boy, just not a dog.
In two days insanely degenerate world, is it possible for you to be anti-dogs?
I will make the argument that dogs are 10,000 hundred thousand times worse for the planet and the “carbon footprint“, than any child. 
First, there is a chance that your kid can be the one who invented the amazing machine which they really fixes all the climate issues on the planet. Imagine Elon Musk but on steroids. 
Second, it is common for dogs to poop in public, even if the dog owners are quite vigilant. You’ll never see a grown child poop in public, even on the public sidewalk.
Let us also consider that dogs, you had to buy all the strange dog products for dogs and pets and animals, whereas for children they could just eat adult food.
One of the critical issues here is that maybe 99.9% of fatalities, which could be prevented to a certain degree is based on driving. Whether somebody hits you and you die, or whether you hit somebody somebody else and you kill somebody, etc.
As a consequence, perhaps you don’t want to die, minimum lifestyle is the supreme lifestyle.
Sometimes people make the other decision of thinking about purchasing a “safe†car, to offset the chance of dying in a car accident. But the strategy is not a good one because rather than buying safety, the more intelligent strategy is just not jump into the car at the first time! 
Another foolish thing… We tend to try to buy solutions to our problems. This is the American way. 
But I suppose a greater thing to consider… Is it possible for there to be a global economy which is not dependent on purchasing, advertising and marketing? Possibly —
The reason why thinking about global, macro economics is not useful is that honestly, even if you became dictator the planet, and you had $100 trillion, whatever… It would be impossible for you to change the current global capitalistic market. Even if you had 100,000,000,000,000 times $100 trillion… You couldn’t do it.
This is where I advocate the simple local approach; change every day behaviors and tactics, rather than trying to change the planet.
A very interesting Taoist thought– to somehow think that the poor planet needs your help is a bit arrogant. The planet will be fine.
I think people who don’t go to church, don’t believe in God, don’t have a religion or whatever… they need some sort of new godhead, something to fasten their world beliefs to, etc. 
But what if I told you… With 100% certainty… That within 30 years there will be somebody who invented an ultra amazing magic machine which magically saves the planet forever? If that were the case… What would be the new direction of your life?
The virtues of riding the metro, the metro E line instead of driving
If you’re a single, older man without children or a son — you’re uninteresting
In the context of applying hypelifting to more tactical training, several types of exercises can align with the mental and physical demands of tactical environments. Here’s a breakdown of exercises and their potential adaptations:
1. Heavy Compound Lifts (Deadlifts, Squats, Bench Press)
- Purpose: These lifts build full-body strength, which is crucial for carrying heavy loads, dragging injured comrades, or quickly moving heavy objects during tactical operations.
- Tactical Application: Compound lifts mirror the need for explosive power and endurance in real-life scenarios, such as breaching, sprinting, and heavy lifting. The hypelifting approach of attempting near-maximal weights builds mental resilience—helping individuals stay calm under stress.
2. Sprints and Loaded Carries
- Purpose: Sprints, especially under load (e.g., carrying kettlebells or weighted vests), simulate the quick bursts of energy needed in tactical situations, such as evasion or pursuit.
- Tactical Application: Speed under load is essential for quick evacuations or getting to cover. The hypelifting mindset of pushing past limits can be applied to increasing both speed and stamina under weight.
3. Bodyweight Exercises Under Stress (Push-ups, Pull-ups, Dips)
- Purpose: Training with bodyweight exercises increases endurance and muscular endurance, crucial for climbing, pulling, or pushing oneself over obstacles.
- Tactical Application: These exercises, combined with a hypelifting mindset, encourage breaking past mental limits when fatigued. Tactical operators may have to perform high volumes of these exercises when under duress, so building mental fortitude while training them is key.
4. Functional Movements with Odd Objects (Sandbags, Logs, Rucks)
- Purpose: These objects mimic the irregular shapes and weights of gear, equipment, or injured personnel.
- Tactical Application: Training with awkward loads helps build the adaptability and strength necessary in unpredictable tactical environments. The intensity and raw emotion associated with hypelifting can mirror the mental stress experienced during real-world challenges.
5. Interval-Based Training (High-Intensity Interval Training – HIIT)
- Purpose: HIIT develops cardiovascular endurance and the ability to recover quickly from intense bursts of effort, essential for sustaining energy during missions.
- Tactical Application: Tactical operators need to switch quickly between high-effort and low-effort phases. The hypelifting mentality of pushing through mental barriers can be applied to each interval, mimicking the need to maintain focus during tactical situations.
6. Tactical Drills (Crawling, Obstacle Courses, Breaching Simulations)
- Purpose: These drills mimic real-world tactical movements and problem-solving under physical and mental strain.
- Tactical Application: Combining these drills with the hypelifting mindset—where the focus is on attempting the task, no matter the outcome—can help operators develop the psychological resilience needed for high-stress operations.
7. Mental Focus Drills
- Purpose: Exercises such as holding challenging static positions (planks, wall sits) or meditation while under physical stress train focus and calmness.
- Tactical Application: Tactical missions require not only physical readiness but extreme mental focus under stress. By combining these with hypelifting’s emotional intensity, the focus is placed on staying mentally resilient when it counts.
8. Combat and Self-Defense Training
- Purpose: Simulated hand-to-hand combat or self-defense drills are critical for any tactical situation where close-quarters combat is involved.
- Tactical Application: The raw energy generated in hypelifting can carry over to combat training, pushing individuals to engage with more intensity and resilience in physically and mentally demanding situations.
Incorporating the hypelifting mentality of embracing failure and pushing past perceived limits into these exercises could significantly enhance tactical readiness. The aim is not only physical success but building the mental toughness needed to operate under extreme pressure oai_citation:2,Search ERIC KIM hypelifting – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,ERIC KIM HYPELIFTING – ERIC KIM.
HYPELIFTING by Eric Kim, in context of tactical training ?
Eric Kim’s concept of HYPELIFTING is an innovative approach to weightlifting, primarily focusing on the mental and emotional aspects of lifting heavy weights, rather than just the physical outcome. In the context of tactical training, hypelifting could be seen as a way to build not only physical strength but also mental resilience and the ability to push through perceived limitations. This mindset can be essential in tactical environments where overcoming physical and mental barriers is critical.
Hypelifting involves psyching oneself up before attempting a weight that feels beyond your current capacity, often through loud vocalizations, self-slapping, or other adrenaline-boosting actions. The idea is to get into an intensely focused, high-energy state, much like preparing for battle, which can be paralleled to the focus and hype seen in tactical training. Tactical operators often train in scenarios requiring extreme focus, resilience, and mental fortitude, making hypelifting’s core principles applicable to preparing for high-stress situations.
Kim emphasizes that failure is irrelevant—what matters is the courage to attempt something audacious. This approach builds mental toughness, which is vital in tactical operations, where facing fear and pushing boundaries without fear of failure is crucial oai_citation:3,HYPELIFTING – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Search ERIC KIM hypelifting – ERIC KIM.
Additionally, Kim believes that hypelifting has broader benefits, such as increased confidence, productivity, and resilience, all qualities that transfer well into tactical training environments oai_citation:1,ERIC KIM HYPELIFTING – ERIC KIM.