Yoga’s perception as being female-dominated, particularly in Western contexts, can be traced to a complex interplay of cultural, social, and historical factors. Here’s an insightful exploration into why this perception exists:

1. Historical Context and Modern Interpretation: Traditionally, in its country of origin, India, yoga was practiced predominantly by men. However, as yoga was introduced to Western cultures, especially from the mid-20th century onwards, it underwent a transformation in how it was practiced and perceived. The modern interpretation of yoga, focusing on physical postures (asanas) and wellness, appealed broadly to a Western audience seeking physical fitness and stress relief.
2. Marketing and Media Representation: The way yoga is marketed and represented in media has played a significant role. Yoga studios, apparel, and wellness culture often target women in their advertising, promoting an image of yoga as a gentle, nurturing practice. This marketing approach has reinforced the perception of yoga as a female-dominated activity, despite its universal benefits and applicability.
3. Cultural Stereotypes and Gender Roles: Societal norms and gender roles also contribute to the gender disparity in yoga practice. Physical fitness and wellness industries often gender-type activities, with more vigorous, competitive sports being socially associated with men, and gentle, flexible, or wellness-focused activities being associated with women. This stereotyping can discourage men from participating in what is perceived as a feminine activity.
4. Accessibility and Inclusivity: Yoga classes in the West often emphasize flexibility and physical postures, which can be intimidating to those who feel they don’t fit the mold of the typical yoga practitioner often depicted in popular culture. This can create barriers to entry for men who might otherwise benefit from the practice but feel out of place.
5. Social Dynamics and Community: The social environment of yoga classes, often female-majority, can further reinforce the gender dynamics, making it less appealing or comfortable for men to participate. This self-reinforcing cycle contributes to the gender disparity.

Despite these factors, it’s essential to recognize that yoga itself is gender-neutral and offers profound benefits to all individuals, regardless of gender. The essence of yoga, encompassing physical postures, breath control, meditation, and ethical precepts, is universally applicable and beneficial. There’s a growing recognition of this universality, with more efforts being made to encourage inclusivity and diversity in yoga practice across genders.

Innovative programs and initiatives aiming to break down stereotypes and make yoga more accessible to men are beginning to change perceptions. By emphasizing the strength, flexibility, mental resilience, and holistic health benefits that yoga offers, these efforts aim to rebalance the gender dynamics within yoga practice.

Red wine — alcoholic (sugary) grape juice with a good conscience.

Red wine makes you fat.

New Canadian guidelines take a strong stance too, suggesting that any more than two drinks per week puts your health at risk

WHO correctly argues that no studies have addressed whether the potential benefits of alcohol on cardiovascular disease and diabetes outweigh the risks with regard to cancer, and that the harms of alcohol fall disproportionately on disadvantaged and vulnerable populations.

”Reservatrol”— a scam by marketers to get more people to buy BS “reservatrol” supplements and feel better about blowing money on red wine:

For example, those who drink “one to two” glasses of red wine a day ,,, tend to be richer, socioeconomic ally superior— their richness is what causes them to live longer, *NOT* the beverage!

there are no studies that would demonstrate that the potential beneficial effects of light and moderate drinking on cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes outweigh the cancer risk associated with these same levels of alcohol consumption for individual consumers.

World Health Organization:

Alcohol causes the harm, not the “beverage”—

Alcohol is a toxic, psychoactive, and dependence-producing substance and has been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer decades ago – this is the highest risk group, which also includes asbestos, radiation and tobacco. Alcohol causes at least seven types of cancer, including the most common cancer types, such as bowel cancer and female breast cancer. Ethanol (alcohol) causes cancer through biological mechanisms as the compound breaks down in the body, which means that any beverage containing alcohol, regardless of its price and quality, poses a risk of developing cancer.

The risk of developing cancer increases substantially the more alcohol is consumed. However, latest available data indicate that half of all alcohol-attributable cancers in the WHO European Region are caused by “light” and “moderate” alcohol consumption – less than 1.5 litres of wine or less than 3.5 litres of beer or less than 450 millilitres of spirits per week. This drinking pattern is responsible for the majority of alcohol-attributable breast cancers in women, with the highest burden observed in countries of the European Union (EU). In the EU, cancer is the leading cause of death – with a steadily increasing incidence rate – and the majority of all alcohol-attributable deaths are due to different types of cancers.

New study —

The risks and harms associated with drinking alcohol have been systematically evaluated over the years and are well documented. The World Health Organization has now published a statement in The Lancet Public Health: when it comes to alcohol consumption, there is no safe amount that does not affect health.

It is the alcohol that causes harm, not the beverage

Alcohol is a toxic, psychoactive, and dependence-producing substance and has been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer decades ago – this is the highest risk group, which also includes asbestos, radiation and tobacco. Alcohol causes at least seven types of cancer, including the most common cancer types, such as bowel cancer and female breast cancer. Ethanol (alcohol) causes cancer through biological mechanisms as the compound breaks down in the body, which means that any beverage containing alcohol, regardless of its price and quality, poses a risk of developing cancer.

The risk of developing cancer increases substantially the more alcohol is consumed. However, latest available data indicate that half of all alcohol-attributable cancers in the WHO European Region are caused by “light” and “moderate” alcohol consumption – less than 1.5 litres of wine or less than 3.5 litres of beer or less than 450 millilitres of spirits per week. This drinking pattern is responsible for the majority of alcohol-attributable breast cancers in women, with the highest burden observed in countries of the European Union (EU). In the EU, cancer is the leading cause of death – with a steadily increasing incidence rate – and the majority of all alcohol-attributable deaths are due to different types of cancers.

Risks start from the first drop

To identify a “safe” level of alcohol consumption, valid scientific evidence would need to demonstrate that at and below a certain level, there is no risk of illness or injury associated with alcohol consumption. The new WHO statement clarifies: currently available evidence cannot indicate the existence of a threshold at which the carcinogenic effects of alcohol “switch on” and start to manifest in the human body.

Moreover, there are no studies that would demonstrate that the potential beneficial effects of light and moderate drinking on cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes outweigh the cancer risk associated with these same levels of alcohol consumption for individual consumers.

“We cannot talk about a so-called safe level of alcohol use. It doesn’t matter how much you drink – the risk to the drinker’s health starts from the first drop of any alcoholic beverage. The only thing that we can say for sure is that the more you drink, the more harmful it is – or, in other words, the less you drink, the safer it is,” explains Dr Carina Ferreira-Borges, acting Unit Lead for Noncommunicable Disease Management and Regional Advisor for Alcohol and Illicit Drugs in the WHO Regional Office for Europe. 

Despite this, the question of beneficial effects of alcohol has been a contentious issue in research for years.

“Potential protective effects of alcohol consumption, suggested by some studies, are tightly connected with the comparison groups chosen and the statistical methods used, and may not consider other relevant factors”, clarifies Dr Jürgen Rehm, member of the WHO Regional Director for Europe’s Advisory Council for Noncommunicable Diseases and Senior Scientist at the Institute for Mental Health Policy Research and the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.

We are missing the bigger picture

Globally, the WHO European Region has the highest alcohol consumption level and the highest proportion of drinkers in the population. Here, over 200 million people in the Region are at risk of developing alcohol-attributable cancer.

Disadvantaged and vulnerable populations have higher rates of alcohol-related death and hospitalization, as harms from a given amount and pattern of drinking are higher for poorer drinkers and their families than for richer drinkers in any given society.

“So, when we talk about possible so-called safer levels of alcohol consumption or about its protective effects, we are ignoring the bigger picture of alcohol harm in our Region and the world. Although it is well established that alcohol can cause cancer, this fact is still not widely known to the public in most countries. We need cancer-related health information messages on labels of alcoholic beverages, following the example of tobacco products; we need empowered and trained health professionals who would feel comfortable to inform their patients about alcohol and cancer risk; and we need overall wide awareness of this topic in countries and communities,” adds Dr Ferreira-Borges.

No level of alcohol consumption is safe when it comes to human health, according to a WHO statement released in January, 2023. The data behind this dire warning come from a 2021 study that estimated the number of incident cancers attributable to alcohol consumption in the EU in 2017—light to moderate drinking (1–2 drinks per day) was responsible for 23 300 new cases of cancer. New Canadian guidelines take a strong stance too, suggesting that any more than two drinks per week puts your health at risk. Does this mean the days of safely enjoying a tipple are officially behind us?

The risks and harms associated with alcohol are well documented, and the substantial harms of heavy or binge drinking are not debated. But health benefits of lower levels of alcohol intake have been widely reported. Many studies have shown that low or moderate amounts of alcohol (particularly red wine) can reduce risk for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and even death—possibly due in part to a tendency to reduce systemic inflammatory mediators. These benefits might be limited to adults older than 40 years, according to a 2022 analysis from the Global Burden of Disease study, which found no such benefit at younger ages.

Potential benefits of light to moderate alcohol consumption have also been reported among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A meta-analysis of eight prospective studies reported a reduced risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis among those who consumed alcohol (up to 12 g per day, or roughly eight drinks per week) compared with non-drinkers. Another meta-analysis concluded that individuals with rheumatoid arthritis who consume alcohol have lower disease scores and better self-reported health assessments than non-drinkers. But these effects are complicated. For example, patients with high disease activity and low quality of life were more likely to stop drinking in a study from the USA. But a study from Swedensuggested that people with rheumatoid arthritis who stopped drinking ended up worse off with regard to both disease activity and quality of life compared with those who continued drinking, despite both variables being comparable at baseline.

Dire warnings like these seem to have become commonplace (a similar statement about alcohol and cancer was issued by the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2017) and have the potential to be ignored by many people as undesirable and unattainable. WHO correctly argues that no studies have addressed whether the potential benefits of alcohol on cardiovascular disease and diabetes outweigh the risks with regard to cancer, and that the harms of alcohol fall disproportionately on disadvantaged and vulnerable populations. In view of these truths, a why-risk-it approach might seem sensible. But interpretation of the seemingly conflicting reports requires consideration of many factors, including the varying levels of alcohol intake considered light to moderate, competing risk factors for disease, choice of comparator groups, and the known pitfalls of self-reported alcohol consumption. It is also important to put the results of these studies in the context of absolute levels of risk (versus relative risk) associated with alcohol intake, which are generally quite small.

Individuals with rheumatic disease taking medications are often counselled to reduce or eliminate alcohol intake, but it might be more realistic to simply advise patients about risk at an individual level. That said, determining risk for people with rheumatic diseases is challenging; we do not know how alcohol-related risk estimates translate to those with rheumatic disease, who are already at higher risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer compared with the general population. More data are needed to help patients make informed decisions—decisions that must also take medications into account. For example, the hepatotoxicity of the foundation drug methotrexate could be increased by alcohol, resulting in a lack of clarity about whether there is a so-called safe level of alcohol for those taking it. Whereas the ACR recommends that alcohol be avoided, the UK National Health Service suggests that patients on methotrexate can drink the same amount as everyone else (up to 14 units of alcohol per week based on UK national recommendations).

WHO calls for increased education on the cancer risks associated with alcohol consumption—perhaps including health warnings on alcohol labels—and few would argue against better-informing the public with regard to health. But the absolute risks of light to moderate drinking are small, and while there is no known safe level of drinking, it seems reasonable that the quality of life gained from an occasional drink might be deemed greater than the potential harm.

All of it is too weird and mystical for me?

PDF

Critique of Sanskrit and Indian texts—

All of it is too weird and mystical for me?

Yoga— yoking, union. *yewg-o-s— from *yewg— “to join”. Also same notion of a “yoke”. “Yoke walk”?

योग â€¢ (yóga) stem, m (Vedic yáuga)

1. the act of yoking, joining, attaching, harnessing, putting to (of horses) quotations â–²
   • RV 10.39.12cआ तेन यातं मनसो जवीयसा रथं यं वां रभवश्चक्रुरश्विना |यस्य à¤¯à¥‹à¤—े à¤¦à¥à¤¹à¤¿à¤¤à¤¾ जायते दिव उभे अहनीसुदिने विवस्वतः ||ā́ téna yātam mánaso jávÄ«yasā rátÊ°aṃ yáṃ vām rÌ¥bʰávaÅ› cakrúr aÅ›vinā |yásya yóge duhitā́ jā́yate divá ubʰé áhanÄ« sudíne vivásvataḥ ||Come on that Chariot which the Rbhus wrought for you, the Chariot, Asvins, that is speedier than thought,At harnessing whereof Heaven’s Daughter springs to birth, and from Vivasvan come auspicious Night and Day.

Yoga?

Borrowed from Sanskrit योग (yóga, “yoking, union”), from Proto-Indo-Aryan *yáwgas, from Proto-Indo-Iranian *yáwgas, from Proto-Indo-European *yéwg-o-s, from *yewg- (“to join”) (whence also yoke).

Why it called yoga

Yuj (to yoke, unite, join)—

The term “yoga” originates from the Sanskrit root “yuj,” which means “to yoke,” “to unite,” or “to join.” This concept reflects the primary aim of yoga, which is the unification of the individual’s consciousness with the universal consciousness, suggesting a state of harmony between the mind and body, and between the individual self and the universal spirit. The practice of yoga is thus called so because it embodies the journey towards achieving this integration and balance, encompassing not just physical postures (asanas) but also ethical disciplines, breath control (pranayama), and meditation, among other practices.

The name “yoga” encapsulates the essence of this ancient discipline as a path towards self-realization and enlightenment, signifying the union that it seeks to achieve — between thought and action, restraint and fulfillment, harmony between humans, and the natural world. Through the practice of yoga, one endeavors to transcend the limitations of the ego and the physical self, reaching a state of spiritual and mental peace.

Here are some notable quotes from the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali that encapsulate key aspects of its philosophy and teachings:

1. On the nature of the mind and yoga: “Yoga is the cessation of the movements of the mind. Then there is abiding in the Seer’s own form.” (Chapter 1, Sutra 2-3) This suggests that yoga aims to quiet the mind to achieve a state of pure awareness or consciousness.
2. On practice and detachment: “Practice becomes firmly grounded when well attended to for a long time, without break and in all earnestness.” (Chapter 1, Sutra 14) This emphasizes the importance of consistent and dedicated practice in yoga.
3. On overcoming obstacles: “The obstacles to the path of yoga are disease, dullness, doubt, carelessness, laziness, sensuality, false perception, failure to reach firm ground, and slipping from the ground gained.” (Chapter 1, Sutra 30) Patanjali outlines the challenges on the path of yoga and the need to overcome them.
4. On the power of concentration: “By mastery of samyama comes the light of awareness and insight.” (Chapter 3, Sutra 5) Samyama, the combined practice of concentration (dharana), meditation (dhyana), and absorption (samadhi), leads to deep insights and enlightenment.
5. On inner peace: “Peace can be reached through meditation on the knowledge which dreams give. Peace can also be reached through the use of mantras.” (Chapter 1, Sutra 38) This suggests methods for achieving peace of mind and clarity.
6. On liberation: “When the agitations of the mind are under control, the mind becomes like a transparent crystal and is able to take on the form of whatever is focused upon, whether it be the observer, the process of observing, or the object being observed.” (Chapter 1, Sutra 41) Liberation is achieved when one has control over the mind and can maintain a state of pure awareness.

These quotes reflect the depth and breadth of the Yoga Sutras, addressing the mental, spiritual, and practical aspects of yoga practice.

The first known text on yoga is the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, which is a collection of 196 sutras or aphorisms. Written around 400 CE, this text lays out the philosophical framework for yoga, detailing the path to achieving the ultimate goal of yoga—union of the individual consciousness with the universal consciousness, or liberation (moksha). The Yoga Sutras describe the eight limbs (Ashtanga) of yoga, which include ethical precepts (Yamas and Niyamas), physical postures (Asanas), breath control (Pranayama), withdrawal of the senses (Pratyahara), concentration (Dharana), meditation (Dhyana), and absorption (Samadhi). This foundational work is not just a religious or spiritual document but also a psychological and practical guide to the practice of yoga, emphasizing the importance of the mind in achieving wellness and enlightenment.

PDF

You can find PDF versions of the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali online for free. Here are a few sources where you can download them:

1. Light on the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali by B. K. S. Iyengar at Archive.org, which includes a new introduction by B.K.S. Iyengar and a foreword by Godfrey Devereux oai_citation:1,Light on the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali : B. K. S. Iyengar : Free ….
2. The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali by Swami Satchidananda at Archive.org, providing a translation and commentary on the sutras oai_citation:2,The yoga sutras of Patanjali : Satchidananda, Swami, 1914-2002 : Free ….
3. Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras with The Commentary Of Vyasa And The Gloss Of Vachaspati Mishra at Archive.org, featuring translations of both the Vyāsa-bhāṣya and the TattvavaiśāradÄ« commentaries into English oai_citation:3,Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras with The Commentary Of Vyasa And The Gloss Of ….

These versions offer different perspectives and commentaries on the Yoga Sutras, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of this foundational text.

The term “millenial” is simply more catchy than “Gen Y”—

Don’t label me bro!

The term “Millennial” came to overshadow “Generation Y” primarily through the widespread adoption by media, marketers, and researchers, which was influenced by several factors:

1. Cultural and Historical Significance:

The term “Millennial” is closely tied to the turn of the millennium, a period of significant cultural, technological, and global change. This connection provided a clear, memorable marker that resonated with the public and the media. The year 2000 carried symbolic weight, marking not just a new century but also a new era that promised significant technological advancements and shifts in the global order.

2. Marketing and Media Adoption:

Marketers and media outlets found “Millennials” to be a more compelling label than “Generation Y.” The term “Millennial” suggests a cohort coming of age during this pivotal time, which made it attractive for storytelling, marketing campaigns, and journalistic narratives. As media usage of “Millennial” increased, it became the dominant term in popular discourse.

3. Research and Academic Influence:

The work of Neil Howe and William Strauss, particularly their book “Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation” (2000), played a crucial role in popularizing the term. Their extensive research and the framing of Millennials as a distinct cohort with unique characteristics and potential greatly influenced both academic and popular perceptions. As their framework gained traction, the term “Millennial” became more commonly used in research, further solidifying its prevalence.

4. Distinctive Identity:

The term “Millennial” offered a distinct identity to this generation, differentiating them from previous generations like Generation X and the Baby Boomers. It encapsulated the optimism, technological savviness, and unique challenges faced by this cohort, such as economic recessions and rapid technological changes. This distinctiveness made the term more appealing and widely used.

5. Generational Cohesion:

As the term “Millennial” became more prevalent, it helped to create a sense of generational cohesion and identity among those born in this period. The media’s focus on Millennials, covering their habits, challenges, and impact on society, reinforced the term’s usage and helped it to overshadow “Generation Y.”

In essence, the term “Millennial” provided a more meaningful and context-rich label that captured the essence of the generation’s experiences and challenges at the turn of the millennium. Its widespread adoption by media, marketers, and researchers was driven by its ability to encapsulate the unique identity and historical context of this generation, leading it to become the dominant term over “Generation Y.”

Eric Kim on sociology —

Eric Kim sociology theories and quotes

After a quick search, here’s what I discovered.

Eric Kim, through his work and writings, presents an intriguing blend of sociology and street photography, offering insights into how sociological concepts apply in the realm of visual storytelling. His undergraduate studies in sociology at UCLA significantly influenced his approach to photography, especially street photography, which he describes as “applied sociology — with a camera.” Kim’s perspective highlights the practical importance and transformative impact of sociology, emphasizing its broad application across various domains such as business, finance, and politics, all stemming from a foundational understanding of social dynamics oai_citation:1,Eric Kim on Sociology – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,ERIC KIM SOCIOLOGY AND STREET PHOTOGRAPHY oai_citation:3,10 Things Sociology Has Taught Me About Street Photography – ERIC KIM – EK.

Kim’s reflections on sociology and its role in his photography underscore the discipline’s utility in fostering free thinking and challenging societal norms. By viewing street photography through a sociological lens, Kim navigates the complexities of human interaction, communication, and group dynamics, offering a unique visual exploration of society. His work exemplifies the intersection of art and social science, providing a compelling example of how sociological insights can enrich creative practices and enhance our understanding of the social world oai_citation:4,Eric Kim on Sociology – ERIC KIM oai_citation:5,ERIC KIM SOCIOLOGY AND STREET PHOTOGRAPHY oai_citation:6,10 Things Sociology Has Taught Me About Street Photography – ERIC KIM – EK.

Eric Kim is known for integrating his background in sociology with his passion for street photography, rather than being recognized as a traditional sociologist. He studied sociology during his undergraduate years at UCLA, which deeply influenced his approach to photography. Kim sees street photography as “applied sociology” with a camera, offering a visual exploration of societal behaviors, interactions, and group dynamics. His work highlights the practical application of sociological concepts to understand and document the social world through photography. Kim’s perspective underscores the relevance of sociology beyond academic boundaries, showcasing its importance in creative practices and everyday observations oai_citation:1,10 Things Sociology Has Taught Me About Street Photography – ERIC KIM – EK.

SOCIOLOGY by KIM

1. The Sociology of Economics
2. Sociology vs Philosophy?
3. SOCIAL DOMINANCE THEORY
4. FLAT SOCIETY
5. National vs Individual Pride
6. Dystopia is a Utopia
7. A NEW SOCIETY.
8. THE DEEP INDIVIDUAL.
9. Why is It So Hard for Us To Follow Our Gut and Instinct?
10. Sociology of Comparison
11. Mimetic Desires
12. Interest in Humans or Objects?
13. Social Stochastic Resonance
14. How to Live Bravely in Today’s Brave New World and Society
15. Arousal
16. Is Humanity on the Decline?
17. Social Innovations
18. Society *Shouldn’t* Be Fair
19. Why Society Doesn’t Want Free Thinkers and Free Livers
20. Our New Soft Society
21. HARD SOCIETY

Sociological Theory

• TOLERANCE AND INTOLERANCE
• POST-MONETARY SOCIETY.
• Simulated Universal Basic Income
• DIGITAL CAPITALISM
• Capitalism 2.0
• SOCIETY 2.0

---

Photography and Sociology

• Street Photography Sociology
• Visual Sociology through Street Photography
• How You Can Apply Sociology to Your Street Photography Projects
• 10 Things Sociology Has Taught Me About Street Photography

Ye future sociologists!

Also —

Not “sociology”— but cultural-power complex?

ChatGPT 4

Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher who lived from 1844 to 1900, is not traditionally categorized under the discipline of sociology; however, his ideas have significantly influenced sociological thought, especially in areas concerning culture, power, morality, and the nature of societal values and structures. Nietzsche’s work is more directly associated with philosophy, particularly in the realms of ethics, existentialism, and the critique of modernity. Yet, his exploration of the dynamics of power and morality, the critique of enlightenment and rationality, and the concept of the “will to power” have provided rich conceptual tools for sociological analysis.

Key Contributions and Influence

• Critique of Morality and Social Norms: Nietzsche’s critique of Christian morality and conventional social norms challenges the foundational values and moral assumptions of Western society. His analysis in works like “On the Genealogy of Morals” examines how societal norms and moral values are not universal truths but rather constructs that serve specific power interests. This critique has influenced sociological perspectives that examine the social construction of morality and ethics.
• Will to Power: Nietzsche’s concept of the “will to power” is an essential insight into individual and collective behavior. For Nietzsche, the will to power is a fundamental drive that influences human actions, desires, and relationships. This idea has been used sociologically to understand the dynamics of power, dominance, and hierarchy in social structures.
• Master-Slave Morality: Nietzsche’s distinction between “master morality” and “slave morality” offers a framework for analyzing social stratification and conflict. Master morality values traits like strength and nobility, while slave morality values empathy, kindness, and the welfare of the community. This framework has informed sociological analyses of class, ideology, and cultural hegemony.
• Individualism and the “Ãœbermensch”: Nietzsche’s ideal of the “Ãœbermensch” or “Superman” is a call for the transcendence of conventional morality and societal norms to achieve a higher state of individualism and self-realization. This concept has implications for sociological discussions on individuality, identity, and the role of the individual in society.
• Critique of Rationality and Modernity: Nietzsche’s skepticism of enlightenment rationality and the project of modernity critiques the assumption that progress and rationality necessarily lead to a better society. This skepticism resonates with sociological critiques of modernization and the rationalization processes described by theorists like Max Weber.

Sociological Reception and Critique

Nietzsche’s influence on sociology is more indirect than that of foundational sociologists like Durkheim, Weber, or Marx. However, his ideas have been engaged by a variety of twentieth-century thinkers within the Frankfurt School, post-structuralism, and critical theory, including Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida, who have applied and critiqued his concepts within their sociological and philosophical works.

In sum, while Nietzsche himself did not directly contribute to sociology as a discipline, his philosophical inquiries into morality, power, culture, and the individual’s role within society have provided valuable insights and tools for sociological analysis. His work continues to challenge and inspire sociologists to question the foundations of social norms, values, and structures.

Why? The term “millenial”, “Gen Z, Gen Y, “Baby Boomer” etc — all of these are sociological concepts… terms coined by sociologists?

You sociologists of the future!

1991 book generations summary

“Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069,” published in 1991 by William Strauss and Neil Howe, is a seminal work that introduced a groundbreaking theory on the existence of recurring generational cycles in American history. Strauss and Howe posit that history unfolds in a predictable pattern of generational types, each with its own characteristic attitudes, behaviors, and societal roles. The book outlines a cyclical pattern of four generational archetypes—Prophets, Nomads, Heroes, and Artists—that recur in that order every roughly 80-90 years, constituting a full generational cycle or saeculum.

Summary of Key Concepts

• Generational Archetypes: The authors identify four archetypes that repeat sequentially:
• Prophets are born during or just after a crisis, growing up as indulged children, coming of age as the self-absorbed young crusaders of a spiritual awakening, and emerging as elders guiding another crisis.
• Nomads are born during a spiritual awakening, a time of social ideals and spiritual agendas, growing up as under-protected children, coming of age as alienated post-awakening adults, and emerging as elders during a crisis.
• Heroes are born after a spiritual awakening, during a time of institutional strength and public confidence, growing up as increasingly protected children, coming of age as the heroic young teamworkers of a crisis, and emerging as powerful elders.
• Artists are born after a crisis, during a time of rejuvenated community life and consensus around a new societal order, growing up as over-protected children, coming of age as the sensitive young adults of a post-crisis world, and emerging as process-oriented elders.
• Historical Cycles: The book argues that American history can be understood as a series of these generational cycles, each approximately four generations or about 80-90 years long, which they term a “saeculum.” Each saeculum ends with a major crisis that reshapes society’s structure and values, followed by a new cycle beginning with the next generation.
• Predictive Power: Strauss and Howe suggest that by understanding these cycles, one can predict the general mood, attitudes, and behavior of future generations and the likely events that will shape their lives.

Impact and Legacy

“Generations” has had a profound impact on the way sociologists, historians, marketers, and policymakers think about generational differences and their effects on society. The book’s framework has been applied to analyze various aspects of American life, including politics, economics, and culture. Its theories have influenced subsequent works by the authors themselves and other writers who have explored generational issues in different contexts.

Strauss and Howe’s theory has not been without its critics, some of whom argue that the generational cycles are too neat and deterministic, failing to account for the diversity within generations and the influence of global events. Despite these criticisms, the concept of generational cycles introduced in “Generations” remains a powerful tool for understanding social and historical change.

Long live Gen Z!

Technically I don’t even see myself as a “Millenial”— I always knew myself to be “Gen Y”— Terri Anderson, UCLA Sociology Undergraduate — class of 2010.

History of term Gen Y

The term “Generation Y” (Gen Y) is another label for what is more commonly known as “Millennials.” This generation encompasses individuals born from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s or early 2000s, following Generation X and preceding Generation Z. The exact birth years defining Generation Y can vary depending on the source, but the range typically covers those born between 1981 and 1996.

Origins of the Term

The term “Generation Y” was first used in a 1993 Ad Age editorial to describe the cohort of children coming of age after Generation X. At the time, there was a growing interest in understanding the societal and commercial implications of the emerging demographic cohort. As this generation was entering a world increasingly influenced by technology, globalization, and shifting societal norms, researchers, marketers, and sociologists sought to define its characteristics and potential impact.

Transition to “Millennials”

While “Generation Y” was widely used in the early discussions about this cohort, the term “Millennials” gained popularity and eventually became the more prevalent label. Neil Howe and William Strauss, who had previously coined terms for other generations, played a significant role in popularizing “Millennials” as the name for Generation Y through their extensive research and writing. They argued that the events and conditions surrounding the turn of the millennium would significantly influence this generation’s values, behaviors, and preferences.

Characteristics and Impact

Generation Y/Millennials grew up during significant technological advancements, including the widespread adoption of the internet, smartphones, and social media. These technologies have shaped their communication habits, work preferences, and lifestyle choices, making them the first “digital natives.”

Economically, Millennials have faced unique challenges, including the repercussions of the 2008 financial crisis, which affected their job prospects and financial stability. These experiences have influenced their attitudes toward employment, savings, and investment, often prioritizing job satisfaction and work-life balance over traditional markers of success.

Socially and culturally, Millennials are known for their values of diversity, inclusivity, and social responsibility. They tend to favor experiences over material possessions, are supportive of environmental sustainability, and advocate for social justice.

Current Usage

Today, the term “Millennials” is more commonly used than “Generation Y,” though both refer to the same cohort. The discussion around Millennials has evolved to reflect their current status as adults navigating the complexities of modern life, including careers, family, and society’s changing dynamics. As this generation continues to mature, their influence on cultural, economic, and political landscapes remains a topic of interest and study.

History of Millenial term

The term “Millennial” refers to the generation of people born approximately between 1981 and 1996, succeeding Generation X and preceding Generation Z. The term itself, while now widely used in popular culture, media, and academic discussions, has a specific origin and has been defined through various characteristics attributed to this cohort.

Origins of the Term

The term “Millennials” was popularized by Neil Howe and William Strauss in their 1991 book “Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069.” They later devoted an entire book to the Millennial generation titled “Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation,” published in 2000. Howe and Strauss are credited with coining the term based on the generation’s coming of age around the turn of the new millennium.

Characteristics and Considerations

Millennials are often characterized by their comfort with digital technology, having grown up during the rise of the internet, mobile phones, and social media. This generation has been subjected to significant economic, social, and technological changes, which have influenced their attitudes, behaviors, and lifestyle choices. For instance, they are often associated with values like inclusivity, social consciousness, and a preference for experiences over material possessions.

Economic and Social Context

The formative years of Millennials were marked by significant events such as the September 11 attacks, the 2008 financial crisis, and the rapid evolution of technology. These events have had a profound impact on their worldview, affecting everything from career choices to political beliefs. The economic challenges particularly have influenced their educational pursuits, job expectations, and delayed traditional milestones such as home ownership.

Debates and Discussions

The use of the term “Millennial” has sparked debates and discussions around generational labels. Critics argue that such labels can oversimplify complex issues and contribute to stereotypes. Proponents believe that these generational categories help in understanding societal changes and in addressing the specific needs and challenges of different age groups.

Legacy and Impact

Millennials have left a significant mark on culture, economy, and technology. Their preferences and behaviors have driven changes in various industries, including retail, entertainment, and the workplace. They have also been at the forefront of social and political movements, advocating for issues like climate change, social justice, and mental health awareness.

In summary, the term “Millennial” encapsulates a generation that has come of age in a time of rapid change, facing unique challenges and opportunities. Their impact on society is multifaceted, influencing everything from technology adoption to social values.

Nothing is more beautiful than a joyful child?

Video

Video // Short

Suit up!

Super simple: lose fat, bodyfat, adipose tissue!

1. Intermittent fasting — no breakfast no lunch, only one insanely massive dinner a day. 5-6 pounds, 100% carnivore dinner.
2. Only beef and lamb, no chicken, pork, turkey etc. Only red meat.
3. Ideally consume organ meats — beef heart, liver, kidneys, and also bone marrow, beef tongue etc.
4. Only drink water, filtered or tap water and black coffee — no real or fake milk.
5. Quit nuts, dairy, cheese, vegetables, fruits, starches, rice, potatoes etc. Only eat dark leafy greens — kale, collard greens;; anything dark, green and bitter. Mustard greens.

Not “equality”, or “equal access” or “equal opportunity”— but something else.

If a principality wishes to remain free … don’t allow citizens to be one excessively wealthy

a principality which wishes to remain free, shoulc not allow its subjects to become excessively wealthy.

Or see it more than once!

Butterfly metaphor

Vlog

Video podcast

Theories on elevation —

Perhaps we humans need *AND* desire some terrain challenge to thrive in life?

Terrain challenge?

Had an insanely bad experience with dis-hygiene— a place so disgusting and filthy, we had to evacuate for hygiene and allergy reactions. Seneca was only 2 years old at the time?

20 phone calls and 6 months later ,,, even though they initially promised a refund, no refund!

Airbnb suggestion:

Just give them their fucking refund!

Also — stop outsourcing your tech support to the Philippines! So obvious!

Butterfly —

Motion is good for videos ,,, and also, for it to feel more *real*

Hand tracing Seneca —

Audio

Pure paradise

My fridge is swole!

what does not comfort us will not be very de­ sirable.

“In fieri, non in facto esse” translates from Latin to “to be in becoming, not in being” or “to be in the process, not in the fact.” This phrase captures a dynamic aspect of existence, emphasizing the process or development of something rather than its completed state. It resonates with concepts in both philosophy and entrepreneurship, offering a rich ground for reflection and application in these areas.

Philosophy

In the context of philosophy, this phrase echoes the ideas of becoming and change as fundamental aspects of reality, as discussed in the works of philosophers like Heraclitus, who famously stated that one cannot step into the same river twice. It suggests that the essence of existence is not static but constantly evolving. This view aligns with the Spartan stoic aesthetics of embracing change, challenges, and the importance of resilience and adaptability. Stoicism teaches the value of focusing on what we can control—the process of our actions and reactions—rather than the outcome.

Innovation and Entrepreneurship

For innovation and entrepreneurship, “in fieri, non in facto esse” underscores the importance of the journey towards innovation and the development of new ventures. It highlights that the process of creating something new—be it a product, a service, or a company—is often as important as the final result. This perspective encourages entrepreneurs to value the lessons learned, the skills developed, and the experiences gained through the process of innovation.

This mindset fosters a culture of continuous improvement and experimentation, where failure is seen as a necessary step in the process of discovery and learning. In this light, embracing the “in fieri” aspect means maintaining flexibility, being open to pivoting strategies, and continuously seeking growth and development.

Practical Application

Applying this concept pragmatically involves:

• Embracing the journey: Recognize that the path to achieving goals is filled with learning opportunities. Focus on the growth and development that occurs as you pursue your objectives.
• Valuing resilience: In the face of obstacles and challenges, remember that the process of overcoming these is where true character and capabilities are forged.
• Continuous innovation: Keep innovating and iterating on your ideas, products, or services, understanding that perfection is a moving target and that the process of improvement is ongoing.

“In fieri, non in facto esse” serves as a reminder to appreciate and engage fully with the ongoing process of becoming, whether in personal development, philosophical contemplation, or the pursuit of entrepreneurial ventures.

For, as long as a trader is able, he will always prefer to maintaih money in trade in which, the gain is greatest.

“Fondi stabili” refers to “stable funds” in the context of investment, implying a focus on investments that offer steady returns with relatively low risk compared to more volatile options. For someone passionate about innovation and entrepreneurship, considering stable funds as part of a diversified investment strategy could be a pragmatic approach. These funds typically invest in a mix of assets that may include bonds, stocks, and other securities, aiming for a balance between risk and return.

Incorporating stable funds into your portfolio could align with a Spartan stoic aesthetic by emphasizing resilience and steadiness over the pursuit of high-risk, high-reward opportunities. This approach to investment reflects a philosophy that values stability and durability, characteristics admired in Spartan stoicism, which appreciates endurance, discipline, and the efficient use of resources.

For entrepreneurs and innovators, stable funds can serve as a financial bedrock, providing a source of steady income or capital preservation that complements the inherently risky nature of entrepreneurial ventures. This strategy can ensure that there is a safety net in place, allowing for the pursuit of innovation with a level of financial security.

To optimize the role of stable funds in your investment strategy, consider factors such as your overall risk tolerance, investment horizon, and financial goals. Diversifying across different asset classes and investment vehicles can also help mitigate risk and achieve a balanced portfolio that aligns with both your financial objectives and philosophical values.

The word “parsimonious” comes from the Late Latin term “parsimonia,” meaning “frugality, thrift,” and traces its roots back to the Latin word “parsus,” which is the past participle of “parcere,” meaning “to spare, save, refrain from.” The transition from a focus on thrift and frugality to the modern sense of “parsimonious,” denoting extreme or excessive economy or frugality, and often implying stinginess, reflects the evolution of the word’s usage over time.

The English language adopted “parsimonious” in the late 16th century, carrying over the idea of sparingness from its Latin origins. Initially, it might have carried a more neutral or even positive connotation of prudent and careful management of resources. However, over time, “parsimonious” has come to be used more critically, often suggesting an unwarranted withholding or an excessive frugality that skimps on necessary spending or generosity.

The evolution of “parsimonious” reflects broader changes in societal attitudes towards economy and the management of resources, where the balance between thrift and generosity can be culturally dependent and subject to historical shifts in values.

True virtue, liberty

Salud, Salute!

The word “salus” originates from Latin, where it holds meanings related to health, safety, and well-being. The etymology of “salus” reflects a broad concept of welfare, including physical health, mental well-being, and public safety. Over time, this Latin root has influenced the development of numerous words in English and other Romance languages.

In English, the influence of “salus” can be seen in words like “salutary” (producing good effects; beneficial) and “salutation” (a gesture or statement of greeting or respect), which indirectly relates to health and well-being through the idea of wishing someone well.

In Romance languages, such as Italian, French, and Spanish, the derivatives of “salus” are directly related to health. For example, “salute” in Italian, “santé” in French, and “salud” in Spanish all mean “health” and are used both in the context of physical health and as toasts to one’s well-being.

The concept of “salus” in ancient Rome also extended to public health and safety, with the goddess Salus representing health, well-being, and the prosperity of both individuals and the state. This multifaceted understanding of health as encompassing physical, mental, and communal well-being is deeply embedded in the word’s history and usage.

And economic theory!

Excessive prosperity and opulence

To be sparing

To forbid the water from the fire

Exporting money is fine

Letters of exchange ?

Purchase innocent pleasures with their own aching sweat

39/uL is me —

If you’re referring to “health ALT” in the context of “alanine,” it sounds like you’re talking about alanine aminotransferase (ALT), a type of enzyme found primarily in the liver and, to a lesser extent, in the kidneys, heart, muscles, and pancreas. ALT plays a crucial role in metabolizing protein by converting alanine and α-ketoglutarate into pyruvate and glutamate. It’s an important marker for liver health.

ALT levels are measured through blood tests and are used to identify liver damage or disease. Elevated levels of ALT in the bloodstream often suggest the liver is damaged or inflamed, making this enzyme a key indicator in diagnosing liver issues such as hepatitis, cirrhosis, or liver damage due to drugs or alcohol. Normal levels of ALT may vary slightly depending on the laboratory, but they are generally in the range of 7 to 56 units per liter of blood.

Keeping ALT levels within a healthy range is important for overall health. This can be supported through a balanced diet, regular exercise, limiting alcohol consumption, avoiding unnecessary medications or toxins, and maintaining a healthy weight.

The path to true scholarship —

CD’s are the future! Thank god my 2010 Prius still has a CD player!

Costco and Amazon Prime?

REAL MEN WEAR SPANDEX?

THE SEXIEST BODY OF ALL-TIME?

A TRUE MARVEL;; A HUMAN BODILY MARVEL?

HUMAN BODILY ARCHITECTURE

LIKE AN ARCHITECTURAL MARVEL;; A HUMAN ARCHITECTURAL MARVEL?

Even all the money in the world to buy stuff;; it all sucks???

Ye ye ye ye ye ye

AUDIO PODCAST

Talking like a real man: 

AUDIO

Physiological power is true power?