audio https://erickimphotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Modular-.m4a
truth
wow
wow
The new frontier.
is key
Introduction
Hexagons and octagons are both polygons, but they differ in fundamental ways that influence their geometric properties, structural uses, symbolic meanings, and aesthetic applications. A hexagon has six sides and six angles, while an octagon has eight sides and angles. These simple numeric differences lead to unique characteristics: for example, each interior angle of a regular hexagon is 120°, and each of a regular octagon is 135° . Such distinctions make the hexagon one of only three regular shapes that tile a flat plane without gaps, whereas the octagon cannot tile alone (requiring squares to fill the gaps) . Beyond geometry, these shapes have found very different roles in nature and design. Hexagons famously appear in honeycomb patterns built by bees for optimal strength and space usage, while octagons are seen in man-made symbols like stop signs and in architecture such as eight-sided buildings and domes. Culturally, the hexagon often symbolizes harmony or integration (as in the interlocking triangles of a six-pointed star), whereas the octagon can represent renewal or protection (seen in religious and spiritual iconography). The comparison table below summarizes key properties and examples of each shape:
| Aspect | Hexagon (6 sides) | Octagon (8 sides) |
| Geometry | 6 sides; interior angles 120° each (sum 720°) . Symmetric with 6-fold rotation and 6 mirror axes (regular form). Area (regular) = $\tfrac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}a^2$ . | 8 sides; interior angles 135° each (sum 1080°) . Symmetric with 8-fold rotation and 8 mirror axes (regular form). Area (regular) = $2(1+\sqrt{2})a^2$ . |
| Tessellation | Tiles the plane by itself (one of only 3 regular tessellations, along with equilateral triangles and squares) . Three hexagons meet neatly at each vertex (120° × 3 = 360°) . | Cannot tessellate alone (135° × 2 = 270°, ×3 = 405° > 360°). Regular octagons leave gaps; however, they tessellate in a semi-regular pattern when alternated with squares (4-8-8 arrangement around vertices) . |
| Structural Uses | Ubiquitous in nature: honeycomb cells are hexagonal for maximum area & strength with minimal material . Hexagonal patterns also appear in basalt columns (e.g. Giant’s Causeway) and snowflakes (hexagonal crystal symmetry). Engineering uses hexagon grids for strength-to-weight efficiency (e.g. honeycomb cores in aircraft) . | Rarer in nature; mostly a human-centric shape. Used in architecture and engineering for shape transitions and stability – e.g. octagonal floor plans for towers, domes, and historic structures (many baptisteries, pagodas, and the Dome of the Rock shrine use an octagonal base) . Recognizable in signage (the stop sign’s octagon shape warns drivers) and some structures (e.g. Octagon House designs for efficient interiors). |
| Symbolism | Often represents harmony, union, and strength in unity. The hexagon’s six points can be seen as two interlocking triangles (upright and inverted) symbolizing the fusion of opposites (spiritual and material) . The honeycomb hexagon further embodies community and cooperation, as many small cells work together for a stronger whole . In sacred geometry, six is a number of balance and cosmic order. | Often symbolizes renewal, transition, and protection. In Christian numerology the octagon (eight) stands for rebirth or a new beginning (the “eighth day” after the seven days of Creation) , hence octagonal baptismal fonts and churches. In Chinese Feng Shui, the octagonal Bagua represents harmony and is used as a protective symbol, uniting the circle (heaven) and square (earth) . Octagons also represent the eight directions and balance in some spiritual frameworks. |
| Design & Aesthetics | Common in tiling, art, and modern design for a sleek, technical look. Hexagon tiles are popular in flooring and mosaics (their perfect tiling creates visually pleasing, seamless patterns). Many logos and tech designs use hexagons to evoke stability and connectivity (the shape conveys strength and reliability ). In games and graphics, hexagonal grids are favored for their efficient, circular-like adjacency. | An eye-catching shape used when uniqueness is desired. The stop sign is an iconic design using an octagon for instant recognition . Octagonal motifs appear in decorative tiling (often alongside squares) for a classic look (seen in some Victorian floor patterns). In architecture, octagons provide visual interest – e.g. gazebos, domes, and towers with octagonal plans have faceted, almost round aesthetics. The UFC “Octagon” fighting ring and certain brand logos (like umbrella or cross-like designs) use octagonal shapes to stand out. |
(Table: Side-by-side comparison of hexagon and octagon properties, uses, and symbolism.)
1. Geometric Characteristics of Hexagon vs Octagon
Sides and Angles: By definition, a hexagon has 6 sides and an octagon has 8. In a regular hexagon (all sides and angles equal), each interior angle is 120°, since the six angles must sum to $ (6-2)\times 180° = 720°$ . In a regular octagon, each interior angle is 135° (sum of $1080°$ for all eight) . The hexagon’s smaller interior angle means it “turns” more sharply at each vertex, whereas the octagon’s larger angle makes it closer to a circle in shape. Both shapes are highly symmetric: a regular hexagon has 6-fold rotational symmetry and 6 reflection axes, while a regular octagon has 8-fold rotational symmetry and 8 reflection axes, reflecting their equal sides and angles.
Area Formulas: The area of a regular polygon can be computed from its side length a. For a regular hexagon, one convenient formula is:
\[ A_{\hexagon} = \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}\,a^2, \]
which comes from splitting it into six equilateral triangles . For a regular octagon:
\[ A_{\octagon} = 2(1+\sqrt{2})\,a^2, \]
a formula which can be derived by dividing the octagon into simpler shapes or using trigonometry . In numeric terms, $2(1+\sqrt2)\approx 4.828$, so a regular octagon has about 4.828 times the area of a unit square with the same side length a, whereas a hexagon has $2.598$ times that area (since $3\sqrt3/2 \approx 2.598$). These formulas assume a flat shape; in practical use (like tiling or material usage), the hexagon tends to be very efficient, offering a high area for a given perimeter – a trait it nearly shares with the circle.
Tessellation Behavior: One of the starkest geometric differences is in how these shapes tessellate (tile) a flat surface. A regular hexagon tessellates perfectly by itself: three hexagons meet at each point, their 120° angles adding up to 360°, filling the plane with no gaps . This is famously seen in honeycomb lattices and hexagonal floor tiles. In fact, only three regular polygons can tessellate alone: the equilateral triangle, square, and hexagon . By contrast, a regular octagon cannot tessellate alone; placing octagons edge to edge leaves gaps because 135° × 2 = 270° and 135° × 3 = 405°, overshooting the full 360° around a point. The gaps can be filled by another shape – specifically, a square (90°) can complement two octagons (2×135° = 270°; plus 90° = 360°). This combination yields a well-known semi-regular tiling: an octagon-square checkerboard pattern often used in masonry and tiling . In such a truncated square tiling (denoted 4-8-8), each vertex is surrounded by one square and two octagons . Visually, this pattern looks like an eight-sided star or a lattice of octagons connected by small squares, and it has been used in decorative floor designs for centuries. Regular octagons alone, however, will either overlap or leave holes if you try to pack them on a flat plane .
Illustration of Tiling Differences: The contrast in tiling ability stems from their interior angles. The hexagon’s 120° allows exactly six around a point in a honeycomb fashion (3 hexagons meeting at each vertex, since $3 \times 120° = 360°$) . Hexagonal honeycomb cells built by honeybees, illustrating the hexagon’s efficient tiling in nature. Bees exploit this property by constructing hexagonal prisms in their comb, which pack perfectly with no wasted space. Octagons, with 135° corners, can only meet in pairs (2×135° = 270°) before exceeding the planar circle; inserting a square (90°) completes the 360° (since $135+135+90 = 360$). This yields the octagon-square tiling seen in some classic tile floors (octagons connected by small square tiles). In summary, hexagons excel at filling space uniformly, whereas octagons need a partner shape to do so.
Other Geometric Traits: Both shapes can be inscribed in circles and circumscribed around circles (they are cyclic polygons). The circumcircle (circle through all vertices) of a regular hexagon has the same radius as the hexagon’s side length , a special property unique to hexagons: effectively, a regular hexagon fits perfectly in a circle with its vertices equally spaced (every 60° around the circle). An octagon’s circumradius is larger than its side (about $1.3065$ times the side length for a regular octagon). The hexagon can also be viewed as six equilateral triangles pieced together , whereas an octagon can be thought of as a square with its corners cut off (indeed, a regular octagon is sometimes described as a truncated square) . This “cutting off” interpretation helps visualize its geometry: starting from a square and slicing off the 4 corners yields an octagon (the removed corners are 45-45-90 triangles). As a result, an octagon is more circular than a square, which is why architects use octagons to transition between a square base and a round dome (more on this in the Structural section).
2. Structural and Engineering Uses
Despite being flat shapes, the hexagon and octagon manifest in very different ways when it comes to structures, engineering, and natural forms. Their inherent geometrical strengths lend themselves to certain applications:
In summary, hexagons shine in scenarios requiring efficient, repetitive packing and load distribution (beehives, grids, reinforcement cores, fasteners), whereas octagons are chosen to impart a blend of circular spread with rectilinear ease of construction (buildings, signs, transitional forms). Each shape’s structural use plays to its geometric strengths – the hexagon’s tiling perfection and the octagon’s intermediate geometry between circle and square.
3. Symbolism and Cultural Meanings
Beyond their physical uses, hexagons and octagons carry rich symbolic connotations in various cultures, religions, and systems of thought:
In essence, the hexagon’s symbolism gravitates towards unity, harmony, and the strength of interconnected parts, while the octagon’s symbolism touches on renewal, totality (all directions), and spiritual safety or completion. Both shapes have been used deliberately in religious art and architecture to convey these ideas – whether it’s a floor tile pattern imbued with meaning or the very layout of a sacred building.
4. Aesthetic and Design Relevance
Both hexagons and octagons have distinct visual appeals that designers, artists, and architects leverage for aesthetic effect:
In summary, hexagons are beloved in design for their ability to create cohesive patterns and connote modern, networked concepts, whereas octagons are used more sparingly to signal prominence, tradition, or spiritual wholeness. Each shape carries its geometric DNA into the visual language: the hexagon brings a hive of connections, and the octagon brings a halo of significance.
The Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem – an iconic octagonal structure topped with a circular dome. Octagons in architecture often symbolize a union of earth and heaven (square and circle), and provide a visually pleasing, balanced form .
Conclusion
In comparing the hexagon and octagon across geometry, structure, symbolism, and design, we see that each shape has its own “personality.” The hexagon is a master of efficiency – it perfectly fills space, distributes forces evenly, and epitomizes the idea of strength in unity (from bee colonies to carbon nanotubes). Culturally it resonates with themes of harmony and integration, and aesthetically it offers clean, repeating beauty that designers harness for modern appeal. The octagon, on the other hand, is a symbol of transition and completeness – bridging squares to circles in architecture, marking stops and sacred spaces, symbolizing renewal and totality in spiritual contexts. It does not fill space by itself, but perhaps that is fitting: octagons stand alone or with complements to mark something special. Visually, they command attention and convey solidity and balance.
Ultimately, both shapes demonstrate how geometry is far from an abstract concept; it influences everything from how a beehive is built to how we design our cities and sacred structures, and even how we communicate ideas of cosmic order or social warning. Whether it’s the six-sided efficiency of the hexagon or the eight-sided significance of the octagon, these polygons are more than mere shapes – they are foundational patterns woven into the fabric of our natural world and human culture.
Sources: The information in this comparison has been drawn from a variety of references, including mathematical resources (for geometry and tiling properties) , engineering and nature studies (for honeycomb and structural uses) , cultural and historical analyses (for symbolism in Christianity and Feng Shui) , and design insights (for usage in signage and logos) , among others, to ensure a well-rounded and up-to-date comparison. Each shape’s entry in Encyclopedia Britannica, Wikipedia, and specialized texts on sacred geometry and architecture provided detailed context for their unique roles and meanings . This comprehensive look showcases how a simple difference in the number of sides can lead to a wide divergence in functionality and symbolism for these two polygons.
Staring at my Prius Lamborghini this morning… The truth of the matter is, it’s probably like the coolest car of all time. The other day I pulled up to curb and there was a little boy who ran and screamed super loud, wow great car!
I think the reason why this was so important to me was, the hilarious thing is this kid who’s like maybe seven years old, probably has no idea about cars in terms of how expensive some are and some are not. Yet he had the personal intelligence of knowing, that my car, with the insanely high visibility 3M wrap, which kind of looks like a combination of hyena meets cheetah meets glitch in the matrix, he obviously knew it was cool.
A lot of people have been asking me about the car, and the truth the matter is, I think the best way to think about it is this like infinite work in progress, it is essentially my personal art car.
The truth is, ever since I was like 15 years old and I got my drivers permit, I’ve actually always been into cars. For me the car has always been a symbol of freedom, pride, performance and more.
What else? To be an American, is all about your car. When you’re out in the streets or in public, nobody has any idea how many bitcoins you own, or how many square foot your house is. Cars are interesting because at the same time, they are insanely superficial, and also, insanely important to society.
For example, Elon Musk who is like probably the greatest innovator and entrepreneur of all time, hit the head on the nail, and knowing that what America wanted and desired and secretly lusted after,,, was like an insanely bold brand new innovative new thought and approached to cars.
The truth is, a car especially a tesla vehicle or any sort of electric car, is probably the worst “investment“, on the planet.  I speak the truth because, I have never spent more than $2500 USD on a car in my whole adult life and I 37 years old. And I’m also the richest person I know, the most wealthy and the most successful person I know, in real life in terms of how poor I grew up, my mom filing for bankruptcy twice, as a result of my dad gambling away the rent money an idea that I learned is, some thoughts like a dozen times, and also, almost becoming homeless twice as well.
I think from an early age, I suppose the upside is that it actually really really taught me some important things about life, money finances, life on the planet etc.
So the first thought is, just do the math. Even as a kid I was able to do this very very simply, essentially… Chelating things from a simple mathematical equation. Like for example if you’re earning $25 an hour as a security guard, you could do the math on how much that $90,000 hellcat is going to run you.
Or even if you’re like a tech employee, making $500,000 a year, but you’re leasing your whole life, and your 2 1/2 kids in your 2 1/2 dogs are all going to private school, and you have outstanding loans from Harvard business school or whatever… And you have some sort of kid you are paying child support for, once again… Do the math, you should know what you can afford and not.
I think the really big idea is, especially after being in Cambodia for like six months and coming back, I think I kind of know the true price of things. And at this point, I’m very reticent to spend money on anything. 
I’ll give you a first example with clothes. There is at least a 10 X markup on clothes, sometimes 50 X to 100 X.
Those cool designer jeans which cost you $200? Maybe a cost like five bucks in Cambodia. Those $700 Balenciaga’s? Maybe seven dollars in a factory in Italy, being made by mainland Chinese people, but in a factory somewhere in the outskirts of Italy.
I think once again cars are like the worst investment of all time because once again… At this point, getting some sort of like secondhand vehicle, a hand me down or some sort of like Prius… Is like by far the best deal on the planet.
For example, I even had this funny idea of a new business idea of just taking old 2010 Priuses, rebranding and re-badging them, and re-upgrading them, with the newest components, maybe throw on some Lamborghini doors, and some gangsta 3M wrap, air edition, and just sell them for a profit as art cars.
In fact, this is what Andy Warhol, and also, Roy Lichtenstein did ,,, for BMW. When you mark something as art, essentially the price on it is infinite.