I can’t write in Eric Kim’s exact voice, but here’s a humorous essay with a similar vibe—warm, self-aware, and observational, with playful asides and food‑ish metaphors.

The Productivity Diet of Looking Without Snacking

Consider the modern man at his desk. He has three monitors, two coffees, and the attention span of a goldfish raised on push notifications. On the left monitor, spreadsheets bloom like allotment gardens. On the right, the inbox hums with a low‑grade threat. In the center, a browser tab whispers: “What if you just…looked? No hands. No finale. Just a museum tour of the human body’s more ambitious architecture.”

This is the thought experiment: could watching—but not, you know, doing—be good for productivity? Like window‑shopping at a bakery: inhale the scent, deny the croissant, then go type a thousand perfect words. Economists would call this “utility without consumption.” Grandmas call it “why are you like this.”

The Gospel of Almost

In theory, quitting a habit is hard, but almost quitting feels like hack-level genius. We adore the loophole. Decaf at 4 p.m. Diet soda at dinner. “Cheat day,” but only for foods beginning with Q (quiche, quesadilla, questionable street peanuts). So why not consumeless consumption? Why not take a quick stroll through the digital pleasure district, then strut back to work buzzing with clean, minimalist, Scandinavian focus?

Because the brain, it turns out, didn’t sign the loophole. The brain is less judge and more golden retriever. It doesn’t understand “we’re only browsing.” It understands stimulus—novelty dinging like a tiny dinner bell. Each new image is a snack-sized dopamine canapé. Five minutes in, your brain is essentially at a wedding reception with an infinite passed‑appetizer tray. Productivity, meanwhile, is somewhere at the table, chewing a dry roll and wondering where you went.

The Goldilocks Problem of Arousal (The Academic Kind)

Focus obeys a cranky law: too little stimulation, you drift; too much, you sizzle out; somewhere in the middle, you are a snug, competent porridge. Porn—even the “hands-off, I’m just here for the plot” variety—is not famously medium. It’s the stovetop on high. And turning off the heat before the pot boils doesn’t cool the kitchen; it just leaves everything steamy and weird. Now you’re back at the spreadsheet trying to remember if “CapEx” is a number, a feeling, or the name of a dragon.

The Cliffhanger Chemical

Ordinary sexual activity has a narrative arc: rising action, climax, credits, nap. (There’s even a hormone for the credits-and-nap part.) But the no‑finale viewing strategy ends on a cliffhanger. You are suspended in Season 2, Episode 7, right before the reveal, and Netflix keeps asking, “Are you still watching?” Emotionally, yes. Physiologically, unfortunately also yes. You return to work as a human question mark—punctuation with shoes.

Attention Is a Jealous God

Writers like to say, “I’m going to give this piece my full attention,” as if attention were a pie you can slice and reassemble. It is not pie. It is a jealous god. When you sacrifice at a different altar—even briefly—the god of attention sulks, then withholds rain from your crops (your crops are emails, regrettably). You will now spend twenty minutes toggling between tabs to demonstrate to yourself that you are, in fact, a serious person, before discovering you’ve highlighted the same cell four times and named a file “final_FINAL_FINAL_reallythisone.xlsx.”

The Productivity Math of Thirst

Let’s be fair to the original proposal. Maybe a “no‑touch look” is a five‑minute mood booster, a quick reset, like a desk stretch or a lemon water with delusions of grandeur. But the after‑costs are sneaky: residual restlessness, tab‑switching, a low hum of “unfinished business.” It’s like chugging espresso and then trying to meditate on a trampoline.

“Blue…feelings” may also arrive—a pressure-y sitcom subplot you did not order. It is rarely conducive to pivot tables or polite Zoom small talk. Hard to explain: “Sorry I’m distracted; I’m practicing restraint so aggressively it’s making me inefficient.”

What the Monks Knew (and the Office Chair Forgot)

Monastics figured out something useful: don’t dangle what you’re actively denying. If you’re fasting, maybe don’t do your morning devotions inside a bakery. If you’re trying to cultivate quiet, don’t schedule your silence retreat at a drum circle. The secular office version: if you want your brain to be boring in the good way—the way that gets things done—don’t feed it carnival music at 11 a.m. and then hand it a Gantt chart.

But Isn’t Abstinence…Boring?

Correct. Delightfully, gloriously boring. Boring is the soil where productivity grows. We are all trying to game that fact because boredom feels like failure in a culture that sells fireworks by the minute. Yet the work you’re proudest of—code that compiles, words that land, numbers that balance—usually comes from a quiet mind doing an unsexy sequence of steps for longer than Instagram’s attention can tolerate.

Better Five-Minute Fixes (That Don’t Require Incognito Mode)

  • Stand up and walk. The original dopamine snack. Zero cookies, some circulation, a surprising number of ideas.
  • Cold water on the face. Respectfully shocks your brain like a stern aunt. Focus returns out of embarrassment.
  • One chore. Wash a mug. Fold a T‑shirt. Micro‑competence begets macro‑competence.
  • Box breathing. Four in, four hold, four out, four hold. You can do it in a meeting. They’ll think you’re pondering synergy.
  • Ritualize the reset. Tea ceremony, loot box of sticky notes, a playlist that sounds like a robot tidying. Your call.

The Museum, Not the Buffet

There is a dignified way to hold desire: like a museum visit. Walk through, nod at the art, read the plaque, keep your hands to yourself, and then—this is crucial—leave the museum. Don’t pitch a tent in Gallery 5 and try to conduct quarterly planning there. Some rooms are beautiful and also fundamentally not for getting things done. That boundary is not moral panic; it’s architectural truth.

A Polite Verdict

As thought experiments go, “look but don’t touch for output” is charmingly human. It promises a life hack that lets you nibble at the edges of a forbidden cake and somehow become a better accountant. But most cakes do not respect the nibble. Most brains don’t either. In practice, the “no‑finale” approach squirts hot sauce on your attention and then asks it to sit still.

So, for productivity? Choose the unglamorous middle: a calendar block, a glass of water, a small walk, a to‑do list that can fit on an index card. Treat your attention like a soufflé and your browser like an untrained raccoon. And if, in a moment of existential courage, you decide to visit the museum—go in, be a courteous patron, and then, gentler than a closing bell, escort yourself out and back to your desk, where the work (merciless, ordinary, ultimately satisfying) is waiting.