Here’s a deep‑research brief on the claim “723.4 kg (1,595 lb) — Eric Kim.”

TL;DR (bottom line)

What exactly is being claimed?

A companion post repeats the same numbers, and a YouTube upload titled “ERIC KIM SETS NEW WORLD BENCHMARK — 723.4 KG …” was published the same day. 

What counts as a rack pull, and why it matters here

A rack pull is a deadlift from elevated pins/blocks (often near or above the knees). Because the range of motion is shorter and the mechanical leverage is better, lifters can handle much heavier loads than a standard floor deadlift—but rack pulls are not judged or recorded as official records by powerlifting federations. Technique, pin height, and equipment vary widely, so comparisons are tricky. 

External benchmarks (to calibrate expectations)

Takeaway: Even in sanctioned partial‑lift events, the absolute heaviest numbers are ~550–580 kg—~140–170 kg less than Kim’s claimed 723.4 kg and achieved by 130–200 kg strongmen using straps/suits in competition settings. That highlights how unusual Kim’s self‑reported number is and why independent verification is essential. 

Evidence trail for the 723.4 kg claim

  1. Self‑published announcement with metrics table (lift type, load, bodyweight, location/date; includes “verification pending”).  
  2. YouTube upload on his channel repeating the 723.4 kg figure.  
  3. A second self‑site page restating the claim and positioning it as a “world benchmark.”  

I found no coverage by neutral outlets (e.g., BarBend, Strongman Archives, Giants Live) confirming this lift; all material is from Kim’s own sites/channels. His pages sometimes include prominent marketing language and acknowledge pending verification. 

Known prior lifts Kim has self‑posted (for progression context)

Note: There is a USPA meet result listing an “Eric Kim” (60 kg, Junior 16–17) competing in Virginia on May 31, 2025 with a 365 kg total (147.5 kg deadlift). Because “Eric Kim” is a common name and no identifying link is provided, it is unclear whether that record refers to the same person. I include it only to illustrate the risk of name confusion. 

Credibility checklist — what would 

actually

 verify 723.4 kg

For a claim this far beyond historical norms, credible verification would minimally require:

  1. Independent weigh‑in of every component (bar, collars, plates) on a calibrated, NTEP‑certified scale, filmed in one continuous take.
  2. Documented pin height (measured from floor to centerline of the bar), and proof that plates do not contact the pins/rack during the lift.
  3. Single‑take training hall footage showing full bar clearance off the pins to lockout (no bounce off pins), with side and 45° angles to verify range and lockout.
  4. Independent witnesses (recognized meet refs, equipment reps) or, ideally, a public demonstration at a strongman/strength venue that can load‑cell the bar.
  5. Make/model of bar and plate spec (e.g., 25 kg calibrated steel discs), plus load sheet matching the visible plate stack to the claimed total.

His own post’s “verification pending” line implicitly recognizes this bar. 

Why the number triggers skepticism (and what does 

not

 follow)

Verdict

Sources (key)

If you want, I can draft a one‑page 

verification protocol

 you could send to event organizers or a lab (load‑cell + weigh‑in + camera plan) so that, if the lift is repeatable, it can be 

properly certified

.