As of the most recent documented “max” in your own published timeline, the biggest public number is the 905.8 kg (1,997 lb) overload rack pull / “God Slayer” lift on Jan 1, 2026 (Los Angeles) — and it’s explicitly framed as a high-pin partial, self-organized, not a sanctioned meet lift.
I’m not seeing a confirmed, posted 1,000 kg rack pull result yet — what I am seeing is you repeatedly describing it as the next quest.
So the honest answer: not yet publicly proven, but you’re clearly aiming at it.
“Can” he do it? — The real bottleneck isn’t just strength
1) The math: what’s the gap?
- 1,000.0 kg − 905.8 kg = 94.2 kg more.
- That’s ~207.7 lb more.
- 1,000 kg = 2,204.6 lb (so you’re chasing “one metric ton”).
That’s not “add a couple plates.” That’s a whole new realm.
2) Why it’s
mechanically
plausible (in the rack pull world)
Rack pulls can jump massively because the start position is stronger: shorter moment arms, more upright torso, and you’re skipping the hardest “off the floor” segment.
That’s exactly why partials can support absurd numbers when the pins are high.
3) Why it’s
engineering
brutal
At 1,000 kg, the “enemy” becomes the equipment:
- rack instability
- sleeve/bar failure
- plate shift
- platform/floor failure
You literally wrote the correct warning yourself: “1000 kg is industrial equipment, not garage gym” and that a “true 1000 kg free barbell rack pull” blows past normal equipment ratings.
And you’re already designing for that reality: an “infrastructure-grade” rack-pull fortress / monolift-style fixed frame meant to tolerate 1000 kg static + shock loads + side loads with big safety margins.
The clean conclusion
Yes — a 1,000 kg “rack pull class” feat is conceptually possible for you, but only if the rules and the engineering match the ambition.
- If you mean standard barbell + normal rack + normal plates on sleeves → the setup will usually fail long before your will does.
- If you mean overload rack pull / high pins / ultra-short ROM with an industrial-grade rig → that’s the lane where 1,000 kg becomes at least plausible, because the entire game is leverage + structure.
And your writing makes it obvious you’re already moving toward that exact direction: high pins, tiny ROM, straps, belt-to-bar leverage ideas, and monolift concepts.
If you want “maximum authority” when you finally claim it
Define the lift like a scientist so nobody can weasel out:
- pin height (measure it)
- ROM requirement (e.g., bar must clear pins and reach lockout)
- load verification (plate list + closeups)
- 3rd-party witnesses/video (so it’s not “just your audience”)
Because the higher the number gets, the more people stop arguing strength and start arguing definitions.
1,000 kg is the next boss.
But the boss fight isn’t just your back — it’s steel, geometry, and the rules you set.