Bitcoin & Peace: How Hard‑Capped Digital Money Could Make War Harder to Wage

Below is the full, upbeat‑but‑detailed essay I drafted for you.  I kept the tone motivational while still grounding every claim in research and history.  Enjoy the read—and feel free to quote, remix or challenge any of it!

Bitcoin & Peace: How Hard‑Capped Digital Money Could Make War Harder to Wage

1  War Loves Easy Money

Modern wars almost never pay for themselves out of taxes alone—the political cost is too obvious.  Instead, governments historically turn to borrowing and the printing press once tax revenues and bond markets are tapped out.  A 2022 Riksbank review of conflicts from the American Revolution through Gulf War I finds that “major wars … often [ended] with the government turning to the money‑printing press,” resulting in large spikes of inflation.  World‑war scale conflicts are the textbook example.

2  Bitcoin Removes the Printing Press

Bitcoin is engineered so that no one—central bank, parliament, president or general—can create new units at will.  Its supply schedule is fixed in software and enforced by tens of thousands of independent nodes worldwide.  That’s why the Blocktrainer series bluntly concludes:

“Bitcoin can prevent deadly wars—first and foremost by making one of the main ways of financing war, the centralized expansion of the money supply, impossible.”

On a Bitcoin standard, a leader who wants to fight would have to 1) raise visible taxes or 2) borrow real BTC from savers—both far more transparent (and unpopular) than silently debasing a fiat currency.

3  “Make War Unaffordable” in Practice

Because every transaction is publicly auditable on‑chain, any large military outlay would leave a bright, traceable footprint.  Borrowing is still possible, but lenders part with hard, scarce money and will demand credible repayment plans—limiting war chests and shortening conflicts.

Historical analogy: King Charles VIII’s Italian campaign stalled when he had to borrow hard gold coins at 14 % interest, then hit a credit wall; the lack of easy‑to‑print money “prevented further attacks”.  Bitcoin replicates that hardness digitally and globally.

4  Property That Flees, Plunder That Fails

Michael Saylor points out that invaders once coveted land, gold or oil because those assets stayed put.  But Bitcoin can cross borders at light speed: threaten seizure and the owner can move coins to a multi‑sig wallet outside the war zone before the first tank rolls in.  Loot‑funded invasions become far less profitable.

5  Energy‑Based “Softwar” Instead of Kinetic War

U.S. Space Force officer Jason Lowery (in his Softwar thesis) argues that Bitcoin’s proof‑of‑work is an energy‑backed, non‑lethal contest for power projection.  Competing over hash‑rate consumes electricity, not lives, echoing Nikola Tesla’s 1935 vision of a “machine to make war impracticable” by channeling conflict into electricity races.

6  Commercial Peace, Turbo‑Charged

Classical liberal thinkers from Kant to modern “capitalist‑peace” scholars note that deep trade ties raise the economic cost of war and cultivate lobbying blocs against it.  Bitcoin is natively global: a Cambodian freelancer can be paid instantly by a Brazilian client without banks.  More cross‑border commerce → more shared incentive to cooperate.

7  Reality Check:  Bitcoin Isn’t a Silver Bullet

Crypto can finance good and bad actors.  Ukraine famously bought drones with donated crypto in 2022–23, while Russian smugglers also used stablecoins to skirt sanctions.  Hard money can still fund violence—it just can’t be conjured out of thin air.

Adoption curve.  As a 2025 LinkedIn analysis notes, convincing whole populations (and their militaries) to abandon fiat won’t happen overnight—but every percentage point of savings moving into Bitcoin tightens the leash on inflationary war finance.

8  Bottom Line (and a Burst of Optimism!)

  • Endless money equals endless war.
  • Hard‑capped, transparent money makes war politically, financially and logistically harder.
  • Bitcoin is the first tool that combines gold‑level scarcity with internet‑level portability.

Does that guarantee world peace?  No.  But it reshapes the incentives so that diplomacy, trade and innovation look far cheaper—and far more exciting—than rolling tanks.

“Make war unaffordable.”

Stack sats, stack peace. 🌟🚀

Stay inspired, keep questioning, and share these ideas widely.  Together we turn bright possibilities into reality!