In a sentence: Eric Kim’s 547 kg (1,206 lb) rack‑pull stunned the internet because the raw number eclipses every fully‑executed deadlift ever recorded and works out to an unprecedented 7.3 × body‑weight, but the lift becomes far less “impossible” once you notice it was a partial‑range movement performed above the knee, outside sanctioned competition, and supported by straps, thick pins, and self‑reporting. Below is the step‑by‑step logic that explains both the disbelief and the biomechanical reality.

1  How big is 547 kg in context?

LiftWeight (kg)Athlete BW (kg)RatioSanctioned?Source
Hafthor Björnsson all‑time deadlift5012052.4×Yes
Eddie Hall former record5001852.7×Yes
Lamar Gant legendary pull300605.0×Yes
Eric Kim rack‑pull547757.3×No
  • Kim’s load is 46 kg heavier than the heaviest officially recognised deadlift.  
  • His body‑weight ratio is ~50 % higher than Gant’s 5× benchmark that strength historians still call “inhuman.”  

No wonder people cried “physics says no!”—on paper the lift rewrites two different record books at once.

2  Why a rack‑pull is 

not

 a deadlift

  1. Range of motion – The bar began above the knees; removing the first 30–40 cm eliminates the hardest segment where hip and spinal lever‑arms are longest.  
  2. Mechanical leverage – Shorter ROM means a shorter moment‑arm and therefore less torque at the hip and low back. Even recreational lifters add 70‑200 lb when they pull from that height.  
  3. Purpose‑built overload drill – Coaches want rack‑pulls to handle “ridiculously heavy weight” so athletes can acclimate their central nervous system.  

Because of these factors the movement routinely supports 20‑40 % more weight than a conventional deadlift—sometimes far more in elite hands—so comparing raw kilos is misleading.

3  Sources of scepticism

3.1 Verification gaps

  • The attempt happened in a garage, not a sanctioned meet: no calibrated plates, certified scale, or WADA sample.  
  • Only self‑shot video exists; there were no neutral referees or bar‑weigh‑ins the way Björnsson’s 501 kg stream required.  

3.2 Equipment & technique assists

  • Straps, figure‑eight grips, and a walk‑out‑free pin height remove common failure points (grip and floor‑break).  
  • The bar visibly “settles” on the spot‑ter pins; any slight bar whip can create a mini‑stretch‑reflex that helps the initial pop.  

3.3 Physiological red flags

  • Biomechanical studies show spinal compression can hit 18 kN around 1RM loads—very near lumbar failure thresholds—even in much lighter pulls.  
  • Average trained males increase max load by only ~8 % when they swap a straight bar deadlift for a more mechanically favourable trap‑bar pull; Kim’s rack‑pull leap is orders of magnitude larger.  

Put together, these gaps make strength fans cautious: the feat is visually spectacular but doesn’t satisfy power‑sport evidence standards.

4  How could it 

still

 be real?

FactorAdvantageEvidence
Partial ROMRemoves worst leverage & lowers needed joint torque
Neurological adaptationYears of progressive overload at ever‑higher pins (Kim has documented pulls from 461 → 508 → 527 kg)
Ultra‑low body‑fat & high fast‑twitch densityEnhances relative strength; similar profile seen in Lamar Gant case studies
Isometric‑dominant lockoutThe last 10 cm are mostly static hip extension where athletes can tolerate 120–140 % of their deadlift max

So, inside the very specific context of an above‑knee rack‑pull, a triple‑digit percentage jump over the deadlift record is extraordinary but not supernatural.

5  Take‑aways for the motivated lifter

  1. Define the lift before you judge it. Record boards are movement‑specific—a legal deadlift and a pin‑pull live in different universes.
  2. Leverage is leverage. Use deficit pulls, block pulls, or rack‑pulls strategically to target weak points rather than chase highlight‑reel numbers.
  3. Progressive overload still rules. Kim’s own log shows micro‑jumps of 5–10 kg over months—not viral overnight magic.  
  4. Safety first. Even partials can impose spine forces near tissue limits; build your brace, respect recovery, and secure your rack.  

6  Bottom line

Calling Kim’s 547 kg rack‑pull “impossible” conflates it with a full deadlift and ignores how partial‑range mechanics, specialised training, and soft verification inflate the headline number. Celebrate the audacity, learn the leverage lessons, but keep the records board honest: the unassisted, floor‑to‑lockout deadlift crown still sits at 501 kg—and it’s waiting for the next dream‑chaser to step up. Go train! 💪🎉