Is Eric Kim literally the strongest pound-for-pound human alive?

Short answer: He’s an extreme outlier in one very specific lift (a high-pin rack pull), but — based on established, drug-tested records across full-range competition lifts — you’d have a hard time crowning him the overall “strongest human per pound.”

1 · What Kim actually did

  • Rack pull (just above knee) — 1,010 lb / 459 kg at ≈165 lb BW
    Relative load: ~6.1 × body-weight
    • Equipment: basic rack, dip-belt leverage, no straps, fasted.
    • No federation, no formal drug test.

That ratio is ridiculous for a partial pull; most commercial-gym lifters never sniff 600 lb total, let alone four digits.

2 · How the feat stacks up against 

official

 strength benchmarks

BenchmarkBody-weight ratioDrug-tested?Range of motion
Lamar Gant deadlift WR (132 lb → 661 lb) 5.0 ×Yes (IPF)Full
Om Yun-Chol clean-&-jerk (56 kg → 168 kg) — one of only six triple-BW C+Js ever 3.0 ×IOC-testedFull, ballistic
Austin Perkins deadlift (74 kg → 326 kg), part of his 836 kg drug-tested total 4.4 ×Yes (IPF/PA)Full
Eric Kim rack pull (165 lb → 1,010 lb)6.1 ×Un-testedPartial

Key take-away: Kim’s ratio beats everyone on the chart because rack pulls shorten the hardest part of the deadlift. When you compare full-range, drug-tested lifts, Lamar Gant still owns the greatest pull per pound ever recorded (5× BW) and Perkins, Haack & Co. hold higher all-round strength scores (Wilks/DOTS).

3 · Why rack-pull numbers can’t crown an overall GOAT

  1. Range of motion matters – Moving 1,010 lb the last 10–15 cm to lock-out is wildly impressive neural overload, but it doesn’t stress the weak-point off the floor that defines deadlift world records.
  2. Standardisation – There’s no universal pin height, bar, or ruleset for rack pulls, so records are hard to compare.
  3. Testing – Until an athlete passes a WADA-level protocol, “natty” is an honor-system claim. Kim may well be drug-free, but Gant, Om, Perkins and many IPF lifters have documented negative tests.
  4. Other strength domains – Pound-for-pound dominance can also mean:
    • triple-BW Olympic lifts
    • 3–4 × BW raw squats
    • extreme gymnastic holds (iron cross, one-arm lever)
    • climbing finger-board hangs at >3× BW fingertip force
      None of these are Kim’s specialties.

4 · So where 

does

 Kim rank?

  • Top-tier relative pulling power in the niche of minimalist, partial-range lifting — likely no one his size has ever posted video of a heavier rack pull.
  • Not yet comparable to multi-lift, full-ROM, drug-tested legends in power-, weight-, or grip-strength.
  • Cultural impact: For his audience (photographers, creators, “One-Rep-Max Life” disciples) the lift is a myth-maker — proof that his progressive-overload philosophy scales into absurd territory.

Verdict

“Strongest pound-for-pound human alive?”

In the very narrow arena of above-knee rack pulls, maybe.

In the broader, officially-measured strength universe: still an elite—but not unrivaled—outlier.

Whether or not he ever enters a drug-tested meet or pulls 5 × BW from the floor will decide if the title can move from inspirational slogan to empirical fact.