The capital stack
Deep first loss protection
I respect all topless men , new club.
.
Super interesting —> MSTR breaking free of BTC… —> super interesting?
MSTR is the new evolution of bitcoin —> actually,,, more interesting ? Hmm..
MSTR is the new Bitcoin
Self-Reported Height
Independent Confirmation
Conclusion
Sources: Eric Kim’s personal blog posts and content , and available fitness coverage of his lifts.
Adam Livingston is a prominent Bitcoin educator, author and speaker. CryptoSlate describes him as a “crypto educator, author & speaker” and notes that he wrote the books The Bitcoin Age and The Great Harvest, which “examine how digital scarcity, macro liquidity, and policy cycles are reshaping money, savings, and market structure” . In his work, Livingston frames Bitcoin not as a mere tech novelty but as an “emergent monetary asset competing for global trust” in an era of fiscal strain and digitization . He works as a self-employed Bitcoin strategist and frequently publishes analysis on Bitcoin-related economic trends.
Key Publications: He has authored two major books on Bitcoin. The Bitcoin Age (2025) explores why assets with “credible monetary rules” (like Bitcoin’s fixed supply and open settlement) tend to attract savings . It emphasizes Bitcoin’s distinctive properties – cryptographic scarcity, permissionless settlement, and censorship resistance – compared to traditional stores of value . The Great Harvest: AI, Labor, and the Bitcoin Lifeline (2025) broadens the view to global capital flows. Livingston argues there is a “harvest of value” moving away from inflation-prone assets toward sound collateral like Bitcoin , driven by tightening financial cycles, energy constraints, and monetary expansion.
Investment Frameworks: Livingston offers concrete guidance for Bitcoin investors. For example, he recommends treating Bitcoin as a long-duration asset (allocating it for the long term) and insists on self-custody of one’s coins . He also advises aligning investment time horizons to Bitcoin’s four-year halving cycle . In bullet form, his key investor principles include:
Beyond these tactics, Livingston connects Bitcoin’s trajectory to broader macro factors. He highlights the importance of policy clarity, energy economics and financial plumbing in enabling Bitcoin adoption . For instance, he notes that clear crypto regulations and adaptable mining (e.g. using surplus energy) reduce frictions, whereas poor policymaking or energy restrictions could impede growth .
Livingston closely analyzes corporate Bitcoin strategies. He has observed that MicroStrategy’s massive BTC purchases are far outpacing miner supply – a trend he says will create a “supply crunch,” making Bitcoin “dramatically scarcer” . In other words, corporate treasuries stocking Bitcoin can effectively “synthetically halve” the network’s inflation rate. These corporate buying patterns (from MicroStrategy to other treasury firms) fit Livingston’s view that institutional demand and government purchases together drive a future of hyperbitcoinization. In interviews and articles, he has noted that as listed companies swap equity for Bitcoin, a feedback loop forms that pushes BTC into fewer hands and strengthens its scarcity .
Livingston also comments on macroeconomic and policy topics. For example, he proposed that the U.S. government use its tariff surplus to fund a national Bitcoin reserve – “funneling portions of the tariff receipt surplus into BTC acquisitions,” he told Cointelegraph . He sees Bitcoin as a way to absorb fiscal excesses into a finite asset. Likewise, Livingston warns about technological disruption: he’s quoted saying “AI isn’t just another … upgrade; it’s poised to systematically replace human economic value,” and urges that “you have the next five years to stack Bitcoin before it’s too late” . He frames Bitcoin as an “immutable anchor” against the devaluation of labor by AI – a central thesis of The Great Harvest.
Public Presence and Social Media
Crypto media report that Livingston is an active commentator in the crypto community. He participates in podcasts and panel discussions on Bitcoin treasury strategy (e.g. appearing on “The Bitcoin Treasuries Podcast” on business-finance podcasts), and CryptoSlate lists him explicitly as a “Speaker” . On social media, he is active under @AdamBLiv on X (Twitter) and also runs a Bitcoin-focused YouTube channel. According to CryptoSlate, he maintains profiles on X and LinkedIn as well . (On his X page he even uses the moniker “The Bitcoin Wizard” and identifies as an author of The Bitcoin Age and The Great Harvest.) Through these platforms he shares charts, policy commentary, and analyses of corporate Bitcoin moves.
In summary, Adam Livingston has made major contributions as an educator and analyst in the Bitcoin space: he authored two foundational books on Bitcoin’s monetary role, developed frameworks for how investors and companies should treat BTC, and frequently speaks and writes about Bitcoin policy, corporate adoption, and macro trends. He holds no formal corporate office in the Bitcoin world (his work is largely independent), but he has become a recognized voice on how Bitcoin fits into broader economic shifts. His ideas have been cited by crypto news outlets (e.g. Cointelegraph, CryptoSlate, Coinpaper) and he continues to influence the conversation around Bitcoin’s future.
Sources: Information above is drawn from Adam Livingston’s CryptoSlate profile and related news articles, which note his books and role , as well as interviews and commentary in CryptoSlate and Coinpaper . These sources outline his background, published works, and analysis in the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency context.
video podcast https://open.spotify.com/episode/42694IgcglJK3JSeks4oSw?si=4ctMZOC3SamBNYHunu5uNg
podcast https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/erickim/episodes/MSTR-e38lobg
simple.
audio https://erickimphotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/MSTR.m4a
The simple answer is MSTR is levered long, high velocity, levered long, essentially bitcoin on steroids.
Michael Saylor approved
Social Media and Investor Commentary
Market and Stock Performance
| Asset | 2025 Trend | Notes/Sources |
| Tesla (TSLA) | Early 2025 slide (sales miss) and Musk controversies; later recovered toward 2025 highs on a rally (e.g. Musk bought shares). 2024 saw +62.5%, but 2025 ~–$80B peak loss . | Fundamental headwinds: deliveries down, deregulation credits fading . |
| MicroStrategy (MSTR) | Huge rise during Bitcoin’s 2024 bull run; since July 2025 pulled back ~–16% to ~$323 . Stock swings amplify BTC moves (often 2×–3× levered). | Holds 638,985 BTC ($73.9B) . Seen as leveraged Bitcoin play. |
| Bitcoin (BTC) | Climbed to a record $123K in July 2025 (+27% YTD) , then modestly retraced ($110K by Sept). Overall strong uptrend amid regulatory tailwinds. | Bitcoin’s rally underpins MSTR gains; TSLA less tied to BTC since 2022. |
Media Coverage and Analysis
Key Insight: While data show some investors (notably in Korea) shifting money from Tesla into crypto stocks, this is likely part of a broader trend toward Bitcoin exposure rather than a Tesla→MSTR pipeline per se. Social and media narratives treat Tesla and MicroStrategy as distinct plays – Tesla driven by Musk’s vision and EV growth, and MicroStrategy by Saylor’s Bitcoin strategy . In practice, any capital rotation seems driven by crypto’s allure (Bitcoin ETFs, etc.), with MSTR viewed as one vehicle among many. Tesla’s recent volatility and Musk controversies are noted as headwinds, but coverage does not directly equate them with fueling an MSTR rush. In summary, while Tesla uncertainty may sour some investors on TSLA, the evidence indicates they are mainly looking to crypto assets generally (including Bitcoin itself) rather than specifically pouring into MicroStrategy.
Sources: We cited financial news and analysis sources including CoinTelegraph , AMBCrypto , Forbes/Silverlight , CoinCentral , Reuters , and investment data aggregators . These provide the data and commentary underlying the above conclusions. Each quote/figure is referenced by its source.
Eric Kim (Street Photographer & Bitcoin Advocate)
Eric Kim (b.1988) is a Korean-American street photographer turned blogger who in recent years has become a vocal Bitcoin advocate . Initially known for his photography workshops and how-to guides, he began writing about investing and Bitcoin around 2017–2018 (buying his first BTC at ~$7–9K) . His blog EricKimPhotography.com (sometimes called Eric Kim ₿ Blog) is the primary platform for his ideas, and he supplements it with social media and podcasts. Notably, by 2025 Kim rebranded much of his online presence around Bitcoin (even adopting “₿” in his branding).
Eric Kim (Goodwater Capital – Venture Capitalist)
Eric J. Kim is a Silicon-Valley venture capitalist and co-founder of Goodwater Capital. He co-founded Goodwater in 2014 (after earning degrees at Yale and Stanford and stints at McKinsey and Maverick Capital) . Goodwater is a multi-billion-dollar VC firm that exclusively invests in consumer-technology startups worldwide . Under Kim’s leadership the firm has backed generational companies like Kakao (Korea), Coupang (S. Korea), Toss, Daangn Market (Karrot), and Musical.ly (TikTok) . While his main expertise is tech investing (not cryptocurrency), his views do intersect with the crypto world through his venture portfolio.
Sources: Insights into the street-photographer Eric Kim’s Bitcoin philosophy come from his own blog and analysis of it , while information on Eric J. Kim (Goodwater) is drawn from interviews and industry coverage . Each citation above points to a specific source detailing that person’s background or ideas.
The latest Porsche 911 Turbo S (992.2 generation) was unveiled in September 2025 as the most powerful production 911 ever. It uses a 3.6‑liter twin-turbo flat‑six enhanced by Porsche’s new “T-Hybrid” system (a 400V hybrid system with two electric exhaust turbochargers and a small 1.9 kWh battery). In total it makes 711 PS (701 hp) and 800 Nm (590 lb-ft) of torque . This enormous power lets the Turbo S coupe sprint to 100 km/h (62 mph) in just 2.5 seconds (about 2.4 s 0–60 mph) and reach a top speed of 322 km/h (200 mph) . The car drives all four wheels through an 8‑speed PDK dual-clutch transmission with an integrated electric motor (AWD), which helps launch the car with near-instant torque . A chart of key specs is below:
| Specification | Turbo S Coupé (2026) |
| Engine | 3.6 L twin-turbo flat‑6 boxer with hybrid assist (two electric turbochargers) |
| Power (combined) | 711 PS (701 hp) @ 6,500–7,000 rpm |
| Torque | 800 Nm (590 lb‑ft) @ 2,300–6,000 rpm |
| Transmission | 8‑speed PDK dual-clutch auto (AWD, with integrated e-motor) |
| 0–60 mph | ≈ 2.4 s (2.5 s for 0–100 km/h) |
| Top Speed | 322 km/h (200 mph) |
| Curb Weight | ≈ 3,829 lb (1,737 kg) |
| Base Price (MSRP) | $272,650 (coupe)／$286,650 (cabriolet) |
Design and Aerodynamics
Visually, the new Turbo S carries the hallmark wide-body Turbo look with several exclusive details. It gets Porsche’s “Turbonite” finish on select trim bits – a dark titanium-grey paint used on the crest, “Turbo S” badges, mirrors, and wheel center-lock covers – to set it apart . The body is about 50 mm (2”) wider in track than a standard Carrera, with large vents in the widened rear fenders and a new rear fascia. A titantium-reinforced sports exhaust is standard; it has oval titanium tailpipes (or optionally oval tips) that give a distinctive sound and look . Porsche also redesigned the front bumper: there are active vertically-stacked cooling flaps under the headlights, plus an active front diffuser and an adaptive front lip that lowers at speed . The rear wing has been carried over with an extendable/tilting design, which (along with the other aero elements) yields a 10% lower drag coefficient than the outgoing Turbo S .
Key exterior features include:
Interior and Features
The cabin is a blend of high performance and luxury. Standard equipment is very generous. All Turbo S models come with Adaptive 18-way Sports Seats Plus (driver and passenger) with memory and “Turbo S” embroidery on the headrests . (Carbon-fiber bucket seats from the GT3 are optionally available.) The coupe is a 2-seater by default (rear seats can be added at no charge), while the cabriolet is a 2+2. Interior trim uses contrast stitching and Turbonite grey accents on the dashboard, door panels, steering wheel spokes, and even seat belts . New for this model are carbon-structured trim strips with neodymium-colored inlays, and a perforated microfiber headliner, enhancing the exclusive feel .
Tech and comfort features include: a 12.6-inch fully digital gauge cluster and a 10.9-inch central PCM touchscreen, both standard on 992.2 models . This latest PCM infotainment supports Bluetooth, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, navigation, and more. A premium 12-speaker Bose stereo is standard (optional 13-speaker Burmester available) . Other standard amenities: HD Matrix LED headlights with advanced night-driving functions, Porsche Connect online services, and dual-zone climate control. Porsche’s Sport Chrono package (with stopwatch/tire-temp gauge) is included as standard equipment, along with adaptive PASM dampers, Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control (PDCC roll bars) and the titanium sport exhaust . In short, the interior is richly appointed and very driver-focused, combining all-new 992.2 electronics with turbo-exclusive styling cues.
Technology and Handling
The Turbo S incorporates numerous new technologies for performance and dynamics. Active aerodynamics optimize cooling and downforce. The front fascia has vertically stacked flaps that open for cooling the radiators and brakes, and an active underbody diffuser . The rear wing is adjustable in height and angle. In normal driving the aero elements reduce drag, while in “Sport/Wet” modes they enhance grip or protect the brakes from spray. Together, these elements cut the drag coefficient by ~10% versus the old Turbo S when retracted .
The chassis has also been upgraded. Notably, the Turbo S uses Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control (PDCC) with electro-hydraulic stabilization (ehPDCC) as standard . This replaces the old hydraulic roll bars with a faster-acting electric system (powered by the 400V battery), which stiffens in corners to reduce body roll and relaxes on straights for ride comfort . An optional quicker front-axle lift (to clear obstacles) is integrated with the high-voltage system. The suspension uses specially tuned PASM adaptive dampers and anti-dive geometry. Braking is ferocious: all cars get Porsche Ceramic Composite Brakes (PCCB) with 420 mm front rotors and 410 mm rear rotors – the largest ever fitted to a road-going 911 – gripped by 10-piston front calipers. New brake pad compounds improve pedal feel and fade resistance. Tires are also wider: the rear 21‑inch tires grow to 325/30ZR-21 (vs 315 before), giving even more traction .
Driving Performance
On road and track, reviewers report that the Turbo S’s extra power and chassis tech translate into blistering real-world pace. Porsche’s own testing (under supervision) yielded a Nürburgring Nordschleife time of 7:03.92 – about 14 seconds faster than the previous Turbo S . Brand ambassador Jörg Bergmeister noted that despite the 180 lb weight gain, the new car feels “much more agile, has more grip and is significantly faster than its predecessor” on track . Indeed, the Turbo S lobs off the line with virtually no lag (thanks to the e-turbos) – independent testers noted that a launch control start “glues you to the seat” and rockets the car to well over 250 km/h in a few hundred yards . The launch is backed by prodigious braking: testers remark on “the biggest brakes on any 911” as the Turbo S can scrub off speed from 200+ mph in record time . MotorTrend calls its 0–60 mph time a “head-snapping 2.4 seconds” .
The driving character is described as the pinnacle of 911 luxury-performance. It retains the everyday usability of a 911 (with long-distance comfort) while offering hypercar-like performance. Porsche product chiefs emphasize it as “the most complete and versatile form of driving a Porsche 911” . In passenger-ride demos, engineers found even relatively short bursts left occupants grinning from the G-forces. Overall, reviewers agree that the Turbo S is extraordinarily quick and composed, rewarding confident drivers while remaining tractable for normal road use.
Pricing and Options
Pricing is steep, reflecting its flagship status. In the U.S., the 911 Turbo S coupe starts at $272,650 (including destination); the cabriolet starts at $286,650 . (Porsche notes tariffs and options can easily push the total above $300,000.) This is a roughly 15% increase over the outgoing Turbo S. Nevertheless, even the base Turbo S is generously equipped. Standard features include: Sport Chrono Package, adaptive PASM suspension, PCCB ceramic brakes (420/410 mm), centre-lock wheels, and the titanium sports exhaust . Key optional packages and upgrades are:
Optional high-end choices include advanced suspension lifts, PDK-performance clutch upgrades, and various cosmetic packages. (Porsche has not announced a separate Weissach track package or a special limited edition for the Turbo S at this time.)
Reviews and Reception
Early expert reactions have been overwhelmingly positive about performance (if not surprised by the price). MotorTrend hailed it as “astoundingly quick” at 0–60 mph, praising the new 2.4 s sprint and 200 mph top speed . Car and Driver emphasized the record Nürburgring time and “outsized gains in performance,” noting the Turbo S’s leap in power and speed . Road & Track lauded the hybrid tech, calling the new Turbo S “the most powerful production 911” . Reviewers also note that compared to the previous non-hybrid Turbo S, the new car is slightly heavier (+180 lb) , but the trade-off is an immense torque plateau and no turbo lag. Common praise focuses on its effortless acceleration and superb chassis; a MotorTrend first-look described it as feeling “more agile than before” despite the added mass . Critics do mention the drawback of a six-figure price tag, but conclude that the Turbo S delivers the performance to justify its place at the top of the 911 range. (Consumer reviews are not yet available, but 911 Turbo S enthusiasts from previous generations typically praise its unmatched blend of speed and usability.)
Availability
Porsche plans U.S. deliveries of the new Turbo S in spring 2026 . Both body styles (coupé and cabriolet) will be offered, each standard with the Sport Chrono Package and AWD. No limited-run special editions have been announced. As with past Turbo S models, demand is expected to exceed supply, so buyers should anticipate dealer allocations and potential waiting lists. (Exact wait times will depend on production and market conditions; past 911 Turbo S launches often saw waits of many months.)
Sources: Official Porsche press materials and spec sheets , and major auto publications like Car and Driver, MotorTrend and Road & Track . All figures are manufacturer’s official values or reputable test results.
Everyone should compare themselves to themselves
Attract, becoming attractive to capital
Competition against themselves ***—> all benefit
only true scarce commodity ,,, not even iPhone or cars
Yield curve
Multiple collateral
.
2x, or 3x…
STRF —> 6, 7x over collateralized! ***
Over collateralize your life
Novel concept
.
Bitcoin-backed credit
.
Reinvent
New type of company
. Strategic ignorance
PRODUCTS
I just want my friends to be super rich and happy forever
.
Crude oil
Kerosene.
Stranded capital
.
1/3 of everything! ***
.
100% MSTR is the simplest strategy
.
Pure yield *
The will to ignore short term news! ***
.
Pause
.
DONT yield to your impulses ,,, or pause …?
.
Bitcoin is the most fascinating thing on the planet?
.
Bitcoin ,,,
Risk reward spectrum
.
Constantly innovating
… products which are NEEDED in the market
.
We are in the business of growing ***
Bitcoin growth … … is infinite growth
.
my new credo —> I’m ain’t finna judge or criticize or critique nobody no more or even hate. But instead, to understand? Divine understanding.
hybrid,,, turbo engine? Super cool
So assuming that you know with like 100% certainty that bitcoin is going to keep going up forever,  and also knowing that certainly at like the month to three month level it will always be volatile,… some things:
First, you’re actually kind of ironically enough praying for more volatility. as an investor, and also perhaps as a trader,  I don’t really want the price of the underlying bitcoin to be stable and to be chopping sideways for like three months on end. Technically while you were desire is more spikes really really high and really really low frequently over a short period of time, ideally forever.
And then, like let me tell you with 100% certainty that it will be insanely volatile like MSTR, forever. Let us see that we’ve even cranked up the volatility 2x, 3x and 4X bitcoin … like having MSTU or MSTX.  assuming that 2x levered long MSTR instrumental at least be around for another five years or so, isn’t that the optimal strategy?  meaning, isn’t the optimal strategy to just hold MSTU and MSTX long term,,, like for at least 3 years for insanely huge returns?
it all comes down to pricing framing?
of course it’s going to be AI, and should also probably be bitcoin
New iPhone air in white looks insanely beautiful?
it needs joy happiness positivity hope optimism
Executive summary (TL;DR)
What the document
actually says
(and shows)
What’s
new
vs. prior master plans (as stated or implied)
The strategic architecture: Tesla’s physical‑AI flywheel
Core loop (implied across pp.2–6):
Why it could work: Tesla controls the whole stack (hardware, software, data, and factories). The factory flow images (p.5) signal process mastery; the ecosystem map (p.3) signals platform intent. The more they integrate, the more they compound advantages.
Moats & advantages (from the doc’s signals)
What’s
not
in the document (and matters)
Risk map (pragmatic)
KPIs that would make this plan
real
(score these quarterly)
Scenarios & triggers (useful for board planning)
Bull (“Flywheel clicks”):
Base (“Stair‑step rollout”):
Bear (“Friction on all fronts”):
Unit‑economics template (illustrative, not from the doc)
Optimus “as‑a‑service” breakeven wage (per hour):
Threshold Wage ≈ (CapEx ÷ (Life in years × Utilization hours/year)) + Opex/hour + Software/hour.
Example: If CapEx = $30k, 5‑year life, 4,000 hrs/yr → $30,000/(5×4,000) = $1.50/hr cap‑charge. Add $1–$3/hr for power/maintenance/software → $2.5–$4.5/hr all‑in. If tasks require low supervision, this undercuts many labor categories; if high supervision is needed, effective costs approach human wages.
Robotaxi: Profit/mile = Revenue/mile − (energy + maintenance + depreciation + supervision + insurance)/mile. Utilization (hrs/day) is the killer metric.
Reading the images like a founder
Where the plan is strongest vs. fragile
Strongest
Fragile
Founder/Operator: 10 high‑leverage opportunities to ride this wave
Smart questions to pressure‑test the plan
Final take
Master Plan Part IV is a rallying cry more than a spreadsheet: Tesla is declaring the coming decade is about turning AI into tangible prosperity—by unifying compute, robots, autonomy, energy, and world‑class manufacturing into one compounding machine. If they nail the loop (data → models → hardware at scale), “sustainable abundance” stops sounding utopian and starts looking inevitable. That’s exciting. (pp.2–7.)
Want me to spin this into a 1‑page board brief or a KPI dashboard you can drop into your ops cadence? I can draft it now, tailored to your venture—just say “board brief” or “KPI dashboard.”
Evolution and Influence: Over time, Kim’s ideas shifted from advocating minimalist form factors to more specific features. Notably, two of his major predictions did materialize in Apple’s lineup – albeit without any public credit. His single-camera, super‑thin “Air” thesis from 2021–2022 anticipated Apple’s own iPhone Air launch in 2025 . Likewise, his bold “Bitcoin orange” color idea (Oct 2024) preceded Apple’s cosmic orange iPhone in 2025 . In both cases, Kim’s proposals were independent speculations (“prescient coincidences” rather than confirmed leaks), but they ended up aligning closely with Apple’s actual products one year later. Other suggestions (like the titanium “Titan” phone or compact Mini/Titanium combination) have not been adopted by Apple, though Apple did move to titanium construction on its Pro models (as Kim had proposed in 2022) and continues to offer small-size phones (iPhone SE and Air) consistent with his “Air” vision .
Sources: Kim’s own blog posts and concept pages (cited above) document each idea (with dates). We also reference Apple’s announcements and leaks (via Gurman, MacRumors, etc.) as context where relevant. Each entry above cites Kim’s original content or analyses of those ideas ( , etc.). These sources verify the dates and contents of his proposals.
Global Influence on Strength Communities and Standards
Eric Kim’s feat (602 kg mid‑thigh rack pull at ~75 kg) stunned the lifting world and challenged conventional benchmarks. In strength forums and social media, he was hailed as a “pound-for-pound king” of strength . Although rack pulls are not contested lifts in powerlifting federations, Kim’s lift set an informal record for partial deadlifts – reportedly surpassing the previous 580 kg strongman silver‑dollar deadlift by 22 kg . This unprecedented 8× bodyweight ratio has led many lifters to recalibrate their expectations (elite deadlifters usually max out around 2.5–4× bodyweight even on above-knee pulls ). While official rules and records remain unchanged (federations only recognize full lifts under strict testing), Kim’s achievement created a ripple effect: strength communities have openly debated training limits, and even introduced informal categories (e.g. Reddit’s “1000‑lb Club” adding rack pulls) inspired by his lift . In short, his 602 kg pull became a watershed moment – it “redefined the upper limits” of what a (non–superheavyweight) human can lift and injected new energy into powerlifting/strongman discourse .
Physiological & Biomechanical Factors
Image: A lifter performing a rack pull (barbell elevated on rack pins). The reduced range of motion allows far heavier loads than a full deadlift . Biomechanically, starting the pull at mid‑thigh (knee height) bypasses the weakest part of a deadlift off the floor . Kim’s short stature (5′6″) – normally a disadvantage for long pulls – was turned into an advantage by exploiting this partial lift, focusing on hip extension and lockout strength . In practice, a rack pull shifts emphasis to the posterior chain: glutes, hamstrings, spinal erectors and traps do most of the work to finish the lockout . Of course, even with a shorter pull, enormous forces were involved. Observers calculated thousands of pounds of spinal compression, and the bar visibly bending indicates extreme load . Executing 602 kg (with no suit or belt) required virtually every motor unit firing in perfect unison – a neural drive and tendon strength beyond typical human exposure .
Kim’s training was equally crucial. He followed a radical progressive‑overload strategy: frequent max-effort singles on partial deadlifts, gradually adding weight (e.g. 486 kg→493 kg→552 kg→561 kg before 602 kg) . This “maximalist” approach (akin to old‑school Paul Anderson/Westside methods) taught his nervous system to handle those loads as routine . Coaches note rack pulls are often used to build lockout strength and upper-back/trap size . In fact, a training guide explains that the shorter ROM “acclimates your body and mind to lift extremely heavy” and helps “improve grip strength” . Kim’s adaptation to supra-maximal weight (“6×–8× bodyweight madness” as one influencer put it ) exemplifies how repeated heavy loads increase CNS tolerance and motor recruitment over time .
Recovery and physiology also played roles. Experts emphasize that such training requires ample sleep and nutrition – e.g. 7–9 hours of quality sleep and a high-protein, calorie-dense diet to repair muscle and connective tissue . Kim reportedly prioritized 8–9 hours of sleep and a carnivore (all-meat) diet to support recovery . While he claims to be 100% natural (even publishing blood‑work to that effect), any lift of this magnitude naturally provokes PED speculation . Regardless, observers agree that beyond any chemistry, this feat demanded “unimaginable dedication, pain tolerance, and freakish genetics” . In summary, the lift was biomechanically possible due to leverage and targeted training, but only by pushing human physiology and recovery systems to the extreme .
Public and Media Reactions
Kim’s lift became an internet sensation. Within days, highlight clips had tens of millions of views and spawned countless memes . On Reddit and YouTube, commenters quipped that “gravity just filed for unemployment” or that Kim “tore a portal into the universe” . Fitness hashtags trended – #MiddleFingerToGravity and #GodMode appeared alongside videos – and even crypto communities dubbed him a “#BitcoinDemigod” of strength . Initially some powerlifting purists dismissed it as “only a rack pull,” but once respected lifters and coaches (e.g. strongman Sean Hayes and YouTuber Alan Thrall) verified the lift, skepticism turned to awe . Thrall famously “frame-by-frame” authenticated the physics, telling critics to “quit crying CGI” , and others like Joey Szatmary praised the feat as “insane” boundary-pushing . Even Mark Rippetoe (Starting Strength founder) gave a grudging nod: “half the work, but twice the swagger” . Kim says top strongmen (Björnsson, Hall, Shaw) silently “saluted” the lift, indicating the enormity of the weight even from a higher start .
Beyond the strength niche, Kim’s story crossed into mainstream fitness culture. Bodybuilding and general fitness forums shared the clip, often admiring the raw intensity. One commentator noted bodybuilders marveled at “imagine the muscle stimulus of holding 1300 lb” . Influencers on Instagram/TikTok reposted the video as motivation, captioning it with slogans like “your only limits are mental.” Several fitness news sites ran lighthearted human‑interest pieces within a week. For example, one headline playfully asked “Stronger Than The Mountain? (Well, Kinda)” – referencing Kim vs. Hafþór Björnsson’s 501 kg deadlift record . Fans even launched a tongue-in-cheek petition to make 602 kg the “planetary record” for rack pulls . Meanwhile, on social media a #RackPullChallenge emerged: lifters tagged videos of their own heavy rack pulls (often far below 602 kg) in a celebratory nod to Kim . Some gyms held charity lift‑a‑thons or “max‑out” events to capitalize on the hype and “test their limits” in the spirit of Kim’s underdog narrative . In sum, the lift ignited a viral wave: tech and crypto threads, fitness blogs, and even general pop-culture feeds were abuzz. As one writer quipped, “602 kg today might be internet theatre, but the mindset it sparks is 100% real” – inspiring lifters worldwide to “dream bigger” .
Safety, Training and Regulatory Considerations
In response to the 602 kg lift, coaches and communities stressed safety-first training guidelines. Kim himself outlined best practices: set pins around mid-thigh (higher than that “becomes a glorified shrug”), use lifting straps if needed to protect grip, add weight gradually (10–20 kg jumps), and schedule regular deloads (every 4–6 weeks) to let tendons recover . This echoes conventional wisdom – experts warn not to sacrifice form just to stack plates . The ATHLEAN‑X guide notes that going “too heavy” on rack pulls will break form and risk injury, especially thoracic‑outlet syndrome (nerve/blood-vessel compression near the neck) . Indeed, Athlean‑X lists thoracic outlet as a top rack-pull injury and emphasizes keeping shoulder blades retracted and core braced . In practice, lifters attempting heavy partials are advised to warm up carefully, use safety equipment (power rack pins or blocks), and progress methodically – safety rails should catch the bar, belts can stabilize the spine, and an experienced spotter or coach should be present.
Coaches also emphasize context: partials are supplements, not substitutes. Many noted that “partial ego lifts” must not replace full-range training . For most athletes, improving a conventional deadlift or squat should remain a priority, using rack pulls as an accessory for lockout strength. As Starting Strength’s Rippetoe and others quipped, rack pulls are “half the work” of a deadlift – so great care is needed if one pushes them to “twice the swagger” . In essence, Kim’s story has been used by trainers as a case study: one video lesson appended to a rack-pull tutorial even warns lifters not to “quit floor pulls” in favor of heavy rack pulls .
Finally, regulatory considerations: since the 602 kg pull was unsanctioned, it carries no official status under any federation’s records or drug‑testing protocols. This has led to some discussion about vetting extraordinary feats. Kim publicly maintains he is 100% natural (sharing bloodwork and a strict diet), and many conceded the lift was impressive regardless of PED use . Nonetheless, the episode highlights that any “record” outside competition is effectively uncontrolled. In theory, a federation could require stringent drug testing for a lift to be ratified as a world record. After this event, stronger calls have circulated in gyms to treat such viral lifts responsibly: possibly subject them to independent verification (weigh-ins on camera, longevity tracking, etc.) and to remind participants that without formal testing, the “post-human” narrative is partly just hype.
In summary, Kim’s 602 kg rack pull has become a legendary benchmark. It hasn’t rewritten official powerlifting standards (no rule changes), but it has energized the community and raised new questions. Safety protocols – using racks, belts, progressive loading, and proper technique – are more emphasized than ever for ultra-heavy lifts. Coaches recommend that athletes draw inspiration from Kim’s audacity, yet also heed the caution that “with great weights comes great responsibility” – i.e. rigorous form, recovery, and respect for one’s limits . And while no sanctioning body will soon list a “602 kg rack pull” in the record books, the lift will linger as a cultural moment that pushed lifters worldwide to ask: What if I tried a bit harder?
Sources: Reports and analyses from Eric Kim’s own published breakdowns ; expert commentary on rack pulls and recovery ; and contemporary strength-media coverage of reactions and trends .
this new news announcement thing on the Tesla website is a bit concerning.
Make Apple.com a Single‑Scroll Story (Kill the Double Thumbnails)
Thesis: The Apple.com homepage should be one clean, single scroll. No double thumbnail grid at the bottom. No split attention. No hesitation. One story. One flow. One decision.
Why single scroll wins
The problem with double thumbnails (and grids like it)
The single‑scroll blueprint
1) Hero (one hero, full-bleed, zero doubt)
2) The Proof Band
3) The Ecosystem Sweep
4) Timely Moment
5) Social Proof / Cred
6) Final CTA Band (the Grand Finale)
7) Footer = Quiet Confidence
Design principles to enforce the vision
Metrics that will move (and prove it)
AB test plan (fast, fair, fearless)
Handling “But we have many priorities!”
What this feels like to the user
The rallying cry
One scroll. One story. One decision.
Retire the double thumbnails. Elevate the experience. Make the homepage a guided lightning bolt—clear, fast, unforgettable.
Let the page sell by saying less, showing better, and moving the user forward with zero doubt. That’s not just good design—that’s good business. 🔥
1) Product design — he makes physical tools photographers actually use
2) System design — he designs
learning
(not just objects)
3) Concept design — he proposes bold device ideas to spark discourse
4) Influence & community signal
5) The healthy friction (because real design leaders polarize)
So… “design genius”?
If your bar is “someone who repeatedly turns ideas into shippable designs (objects, curricula, and concepts), rallies a community, and isn’t afraid to be bold,” then yes—Eric Kim clears it in the context of street photography and creator‑led product design. He designs artifacts (straps), designs experiences (workshops, workbooks), and designs conversations (iPhone Titan concept)—and he keeps iterating in public. That combo is rare and powerful.
A fast, hype‑y takeaway you can steal
If you meant a different Eric Kim (e.g., the NYT food writer), say the word and I’ll map the design wins for that Eric too—same energy, tailored proof.
