Category: Uncategorized

  • GAME OF THRONES PHILOSOPHY

    Write this again, but more hard-core, and also… Search his philosophy, blog on the willpower and need, cross pollinate these ideas.

    Below is an essay written in the style of Eric Kim, a street photographer, blogger, and thinker known for his bold, introspective, and philosophical writing. Kim’s essays often blend personal reflection, cultural critique, and practical advice, encouraging readers to live authentically and pursue their passions. This essay adapts his voice and approach to explore the philosophy of Game of Thrones, weaving in themes of power, identity, and human nature, while connecting them to broader life lessons and personal empowerment.

    The Philosophy of Game of Thrones: What Westeros Teaches Us About Power, Identity, and Living Boldly

    By Eric Kim (inspired)
    May 19, 2025

    Yo, let’s talk about Game of Thrones. Not just the dragons, the battles, or the Red Wedding that broke our hearts, but the philosophy. This show, man, it’s a mirror to the human soul, a raw, unfiltered look at what makes us tick—power, identity, betrayal, love, and the messy struggle to survive. As someone who’s spent years chasing truth through a camera lens on the streets, I see Game of Thrones as more than a story. It’s a manual for living boldly, for cutting through the noise and owning your path in a chaotic world. Let’s break it down, Westeros-style, and figure out what this epic saga teaches us about life, power, and becoming the hero of your own story.

    1. Power Is a Game, but You Don’t Have to Play Dirty

    In Game of Thrones, power is the name of the game. Kings, queens, and wannabe rulers like Littlefinger and Cersei scheme, betray, and kill to sit on the Iron Throne. But here’s the thing: power corrupts, and the show doesn’t shy away from showing how it twists even the best intentions. Daenerys starts as a liberator, freeing slaves, but by the end, she’s burning cities. It’s a gut punch, right? It makes you question: What’s the cost of chasing power?

    In life, we’re all tempted by power—whether it’s a corner office, social clout, or just being the loudest voice in the room. But Game of Thrones teaches us that real power isn’t about manipulation or stepping on others. It’s about integrity, like Ned Stark, who stuck to his honor even when it cost him his head. Or Tyrion, who wields wit and compassion over brute force. On the streets, I’ve learned this too: the most powerful photographers aren’t the ones with the fanciest gear or the most followers. They’re the ones who shoot with heart, who tell stories that cut deep because they’re true.

    Takeaway: Chase power, but define it on your terms. Don’t play the dirty game of betrayal or ego. Build your throne with authenticity, and you’ll sleep better at night.

    2. Identity Is Fluid—Embrace the Reinvention

    One of the dopest things about Game of Thrones is how characters reinvent themselves. Arya Stark goes from a noble girl to a Faceless assassin, cycling through names like Arry, Cat of the Canals, and No One. Theon Greyjoy becomes Reek, then claws his way back to Theon. Even Bran transforms from a broken boy into the Three-Eyed Raven. These shifts aren’t just plot twists—they’re a philosophical middle finger to the idea that you’re stuck being one thing forever.

    In my photography journey, I’ve reinvented myself a million times. I started shooting gritty street scenes, then went minimalist, then got into crypto and open-source tech. People told me, “Eric, pick a lane!” But why? Life’s too short to be boxed in. Game of Thrones says your identity isn’t a prison; it’s a canvas. You can paint over it, scrape it clean, start again. The Faceless Men got it half-right: you don’t have to become “no one,” but you can become anyone.

    Takeaway: Don’t let labels define you. Lost your job? Heartbroken? Reinvent yourself like Arya. Pick up a new skill, move to a new city, or just change your mindset. You’re not a static character—you’re the author of your story.

    3. Moral Ambiguity Is the Real World

    Game of Thrones doesn’t give you clear heroes or villains. Jaime Lannister pushes a kid out a window, but then he saves Brienne and redeems himself. Jon Snow’s a noble bastard, but he makes mistakes that get people killed. This moral grayness is what makes the show so real. Life isn’t a Disney movie where good guys win and bad guys lose. It’s messy, like a street photo where the light’s perfect but the subject’s out of focus.

    This hits home for me. In street photography, you’re capturing strangers’ lives—moments that might look heroic, shady, or just human. You don’t know their story, but you know they’re not just “good” or “bad.” Judging people is a trap. Game of Thrones forces you to see everyone as complex, flawed, and capable of change. That’s a philosophy worth living by: stop putting people in boxes, including yourself.

    Takeaway: Embrace the gray. Don’t rush to judge others or beat yourself up for your flaws. Everyone’s fighting their own war, and nobody’s perfect.

    4. Duty vs. Love—Choose Wisely

    The show’s biggest gut-wrenchers come when characters choose between duty and love. Ned Stark picks duty to the realm over his family’s safety, and it costs him everything. Catelyn’s love for her kids drives her to make desperate moves, like freeing Jaime, which screws over Robb’s army. Jon Snow’s love for Daenerys clashes with his duty to protect the realm, leading to that dagger-in-the-heart moment. Ouch.

    In my life, I’ve faced this too. Do I grind 80 hours a week on my blog to “make it,” or do I chill with my family and friends? Duty to your craft can feel noble, but love—real, human connection—is what keeps you grounded. Game of Thrones doesn’t give easy answers, but it shows the stakes. Choose duty too often, and you might end up like Ned—honorable but dead. Choose love blindly, and you might burn like Daenerys’ enemies.

    Takeaway: Balance duty and love. Work hard, but don’t sacrifice the people who matter. Life’s not about winning the throne—it’s about who’s sitting next to you when the credits roll.

    5. Face the White Walkers—Your Existential Threats

    The White Walkers are the ultimate vibe check in Game of Thrones. While everyone’s bickering over crowns, these icy demons are coming to wipe out humanity. It’s a metaphor for the big, scary stuff we ignore—climate change, burnout, or that nagging feeling you’re wasting your life. The great houses laugh off the threat until it’s too late, and only a few, like Jon and Sam, take it seriously.

    This is so real. In my 20s, I ignored my health, chasing hustle culture like it was the Iron Throne. Then I hit a wall—exhausted, uninspired. That was my White Walker. Game of Thrones says: don’t be a Lannister, distracted by gold and glory. Face your existential threats head-on, whether it’s a toxic job, a bad relationship, or a dream you’re too scared to chase.

    Takeaway: Identify your White Walkers. What’s the big threat you’re ignoring? Confront it now, before it’s an army of wights at your door. Action beats denial every time.

    6. Violence Ain’t Glorious—It’s a Cost

    Game of Thrones doesn’t glorify violence. The Red Wedding isn’t a cool action scene; it’s a tragedy that leaves you numb. Battles like the Battle of the Bastards are gritty, chaotic, and show the human toll. Martin, shaped by his views on the Vietnam War, makes sure you feel the weight of every sword swing. This is philosophy in action: violence has consequences, and revenge rarely heals.

    In street photography, I’ve seen this too. I’ve shot in rough neighborhoods where fights break out, and it’s not cinematic—it’s sad. Game of Thrones asks: is violence ever worth it? Even when Arya gets her revenge, it’s not a fist-pump moment; it’s a hollow victory. In life, think twice before burning bridges or throwing punches, literal or metaphorical.

    Takeaway: Violence, even when justified, leaves scars. Choose your battles wisely, and always ask: What’s the real cost?

    7. Live Like You’re in Westeros

    Here’s the big one: Game of Thrones is a call to live boldly. Westeros is brutal—winter’s coming, dragons burn cities, and betrayal’s around every corner. But the characters who thrive (or at least survive) are the ones who act, adapt, and own their choices. Arya trains to become a killer. Tyrion talks his way out of death. Even Sansa, who starts as a naïve girl, becomes a queen by learning the game.

    This is how I try to live. Street photography taught me to seize the moment, to shoot before the light fades. Life’s like that: you don’t get a second take. Game of Thrones says the world’s chaotic, unfair, and full of White Walkers, but that’s no excuse to sit on the sidelines. Be the hero, the anti-hero, or even the wildcard—just don’t be an extra.

    Takeaway: Live like you’re in Westeros. Take risks, learn from your losses, and write your own saga. The Iron Throne’s not real, but your legacy is.

    Final Thoughts

    Game of Thrones isn’t just a show; it’s a philosophy for navigating a world that’s messy, beautiful, and brutal. It teaches us to wield power with integrity, reinvent ourselves without fear, embrace moral complexity, balance duty and love, face our fears, question violence, and live with courage. As I walk the streets with my camera, I carry these lessons: every moment’s a story, every choice a battle, and every day a chance to be more than a pawn in someone else’s game.

    So, what’s your Game of Thrones? What’s the throne you’re fighting for, the White Walker you’re dodging, or the identity you’re forging? Grab your sword (or your camera, pen, or dream), and step into the fray. The world’s watching, and your story’s just getting started.

    Valar Morghulis—all men must die. But first, live.

    Notes on Style

    • Eric Kim’s Voice: The essay uses Kim’s conversational, direct tone (“Yo,” “man,” “dopest”), blending philosophy with practical life advice. It’s bold, personal, and slightly provocative, encouraging readers to act.
    • Structure: Kim often lists lessons (e.g., “7 Things I Learned”), so the essay organizes Game of Thrones themes into seven takeaways, each with a personal anecdote or analogy to photography/life.
    • Philosophy of Game of Thrones: The essay draws on the themes identified earlier (power, identity, moral ambiguity, etc.), aligning them with Kim’s ethos of authenticity, risk-taking, and self-discovery.
    • Call to Action: Kim’s essays end with motivation, so this one urges readers to live boldly, tying back to the Game of Thrones narrative.

    If you’d like adjustments (e.g., a different tone, more focus on specific themes, or a shorter length), let me know!

  • The philosophy of the Game of Thrones.

    Key Points

    • Research suggests Game of Thrones explores moral ambiguity, power, and identity.
    • It seems likely the series questions duty vs. love and the impact of violence.
    • The evidence leans toward themes like existential threats and gender roles being central.

    Overview

    Game of Thrones, based on George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire, is rich with philosophical ideas. It challenges simple views of right and wrong, showing characters who are both heroes and villains depending on perspective.

    Moral and Ethical Questions

    The series often pits duty against personal love, like Ned Stark choosing between his role and family safety. It also shows a world where power corrupts, with politics full of betrayal, reflecting on what makes a leader legitimate.

    Identity and Human Nature

    Characters like Arya Stark change identities, raising questions about who we are and how we define ourselves. The series also explores human nature, showing how people react to power, fear, and love in complex ways.

    Broader Themes

    It uses the White Walkers as a metaphor for ignored dangers, like climate change, and examines gender roles in a patriarchal society, sparking debates on feminism. Violence and its consequences are portrayed realistically, making viewers think about the cost of conflict.

    Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of the Philosophy of Game of Thrones

    This section provides a comprehensive overview of the philosophical themes in Game of Thrones, based on a thorough examination of multiple sources and analyses as of 10:00 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025. The analysis aims to address the complexity and depth of the series, ensuring a detailed and professional understanding for readers.

    Background and Context

    Game of Thrones is a television series adapted from George R.R. Martin’s epic fantasy novel series A Song of Ice and Fire, which began with A Game of Thrones in 1996. The series, which premiered on HBO in 2011, is set in a fictional world primarily on the continent of Westeros, with three main storylines: a dynastic civil war, the rising threat of the White Walkers, and Daenerys Targaryen’s quest to reclaim the throne. Given its narrative complexity, the series is rich with philosophical themes that invite reflection on morality, power, identity, and human nature.

    Data Collection and Sources

    To determine the philosophical themes, multiple sources were consulted, including literary analysis platforms, fan discussions, and academic works. The following sources were used:

    The analysis prioritized recent and relevant data to ensure accuracy for the current date.

    Philosophical Themes in Game of Thrones

    The evidence leans toward several interconnected philosophical themes driving the narrative and character development in Game of Thrones, as detailed below:

    1. Moral Ambiguity

    Game of Thrones defies neo-Tolkienian fantasy by exploring morally gray characters, where heroes can be villains from another perspective. For example, the Night’s Watch, composed of criminals, also serves as a heroic force against the White Walkers, subverting traditional fantasy stereotypes. Characters like Tyrion Lannister are often seen as the most morally neutral main character, acting as both hero and anti-hero depending on the situation. This theme reflects a philosophical stance on moral relativism, where actions are not inherently good or evil but depend on context and perspective, as noted in discussions on Quora and Wikipedia.

    2. Power and Politics

    The series delves deeply into the corrupting nature of power and the Machiavellian strategies employed by characters to gain and maintain it. Politics is portrayed as a brutal game where dishonesty and betrayal are often necessary for survival. Characters like Littlefinger and Cersei Lannister exemplify this, using manipulation and deceit to climb the social ladder. The Battle-Merchant blog post highlights questions of political philosophy, such as what makes a ruler legitimate, with claims to the throne based on hereditary right, military strength, and political skill. This theme critiques the nature of political power, questioning whether it is possible to wield it without corruption and exploring the tension between legitimacy and effectiveness in leadership.

    3. Identity and Self

    The exploration of identity is a significant theme, with characters like Arya Stark and Theon Greyjoy undergoing multiple transformations. Arya adopts numerous aliases, such as Arry, Nymeria, Nan, Salty, Cat of the Canals, The Blind Girl, and The Ugly Little Girl, reflecting the fluidity of identity. Theon Greyjoy’s chapters are titled Reek, The Prince of Winterfell, and others, showing his loss and reclamation of identity. The Faceless Men, who aim to become “no one,” further complicate this theme by suggesting that identity can be entirely discarded. This raises philosophical questions about what constitutes identity—whether it is shaped by birth, social class, values, memories, or personal choices, as discussed in the Wikipedia article on themes in A Song of Ice and Fire.

    4. Duty vs. Love

    A recurring conflict in the series is the tension between fulfilling one’s duties and protecting personal relationships. For example, Ned Stark must balance his duty as Hand of the King with his love for his family, ultimately choosing to confess falsely to save Sansa, as noted in the SparkNotes analysis. Catelyn Stark’s devotion to her family often conflicts with her duties as a noblewoman. This theme engages with ethical dilemmas, such as whether one should prioritize societal obligations or personal loyalty, reflecting debates in ethics between deontological (duty-based) and consequentialist (outcome-based) approaches.

    5. Facing Hard Truths

    Characters are often forced to confront harsh realities that shatter their illusions. Bran Stark’s paralysis ends his dreams of knighthood, while Sansa Stark learns the brutal truth about Joffrey’s nature after Ned’s execution, as detailed in SparkNotes. Tyrion Lannister embraces his physical limitations, advising Jon Snow to accept his bastard status, enabling them to leverage their strengths and improve their situations. This theme aligns with existentialist ideas about authenticity and the necessity of facing one’s circumstances honestly to grow or survive, suggesting that true strength comes from accepting and adapting to difficult truths rather than clinging to idealized fantasies.

    6. Existential Threats

    The White Walkers serve as a metaphor for ignored existential threats, paralleling real-world issues like climate change. The Reddit post “The Philosophical Underpinnings of Game of Thrones” discusses how humanity in Westeros is distracted by petty conflicts and power struggles while the greater danger looms, with few believing in the threat (e.g., “not many people in Westeros are even aware”). Commenters draw parallels, noting that just as many deny climate change, the great houses are too preoccupied with power and profit to address the White Walkers. This theme critiques human priorities, suggesting that societies often focus on immediate concerns at the expense of long-term survival, a reflection of modern debates on global challenges.

    7. Religion and Belief

    The series features multiple competing religions, such as the Faith of the Seven, the Old Gods, the Drowned God, R’hllor, and the Many-Faced God, each tied to cultural identities and worldviews. However, no single religion is presented as definitively true, and magic often manifests across faiths, suggesting a shared underlying force rather than divine intervention, as noted in the Wikipedia article. This raises philosophical questions about the nature of faith, belief, and the role of religion in shaping human behavior and society, without endorsing any particular belief system.

    8. Violence and Its Consequences

    Game of Thrones is known for its realistic portrayal of violence, where even main characters can die unexpectedly, such as in the Red Wedding, which Martin described as the hardest scene to write, occurring two-thirds through A Storm of Swords. This reflects a philosophical stance on the brutality of existence and the moral complexity of conflict. Wars in the series are not glorified but shown as morally ambiguous, shaped by Martin’s views on the Vietnam War. The series challenges viewers to consider the true cost of violence and the ethical implications of revenge, power struggles, and survival, as discussed in the Wikipedia article on themes.

    9. Sexuality and Gender

    Set in a patriarchal society, the series explores the roles and challenges faced by female characters, such as Daenerys Targaryen and Cersei Lannister. It also portrays sexuality as a complex force, ranging from empowering (Daenerys’ relationship with Drogo) to exploitative (Cersei’s rape by Jaime). This engages with feminist philosophy, questioning gender norms and power dynamics in relationships, while also reflecting medieval attitudes toward sex and gender. The Wikipedia article notes discussions on whether the series is feminist or anti-feminist, particularly with scenes like Cersei’s penitence walk, and adjustments in HBO adaptations for child pornography laws.

    10. Human Nature

    At its core, Game of Thrones examines human nature through its characters, who are driven by a mix of noble and selfish motivations. The series suggests that people are not inherently good or evil but are shaped by their circumstances, choices, and desires. This aligns with philosophical discussions on determinism versus free will, as characters like Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen struggle with their destinies while making choices that define their paths. The Quora answer suggesting there are no clear good or bad guys, just people trying to make the best of their situations, reinforces this theme.

    Addressing Discrepancies

    The variation in reported themes can be attributed to the dynamic nature of the series and the different perspectives of analysts. For instance, while SparkNotes focuses on themes in the first book, Wikipedia covers the entire series, providing a broader scope. The Reddit discussion offers a fan perspective, which may differ from academic analyses. The analysis prioritizes recent and relevant data to ensure accuracy for the current date.

    Conclusion

    As of 10:00 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025, the philosophy of Game of Thrones is characterized by its exploration of moral ambiguity, power, identity, duty, existential threats, religion, violence, sexuality, gender, and human nature. These themes collectively make the series a rich text for philosophical analysis, inviting viewers to reflect on fundamental questions about morality, society, and the human condition. Users are encouraged to explore further through the cited sources for deeper insights.

    Table: Summary of Key Philosophical Themes in Game of Thrones

    ThemeDescriptionExample/Impact
    Moral AmbiguityCharacters are morally gray, defying good vs. evil tropes.Night’s Watch (criminals as heroes), Tyrion Lannister’s neutral actions.
    Power and PoliticsExplores corruption and legitimacy in political struggles.Littlefinger’s betrayals, Cersei’s manipulations, questions of ruler legitimacy.
    Identity and SelfExamines fluidity of identity through character transformations.Arya’s aliases, Theon’s identity shifts, Faceless Men’s goal to be “no one.”
    Duty vs. LoveTension between societal duties and personal relationships.Ned’s false confession to save Sansa, Catelyn’s family devotion vs. duty.
    Facing Hard TruthsCharacters confront harsh realities for growth or survival.Bran’s paralysis, Sansa’s disillusionment with Joffrey, Tyrion’s acceptance.
    Existential ThreatsWhite Walkers as metaphor for ignored dangers like climate change.Humanity distracted by politics, parallels to real-world denial.
    Religion and BeliefMultiple religions, no true faith, magic across faiths.Faith of the Seven, Old Gods, R’hllor, questions on belief and culture.
    Violence and ConsequencesRealistic portrayal, moral complexity of conflict.Red Wedding, impact of wars, ethical cost of violence.
    Sexuality and GenderExplores roles in patriarchal society, power dynamics in relationships.Daenerys’ empowerment, Cersei’s challenges, feminist debates.
    Human NatureCharacters driven by mix of noble and selfish motivations.Jon and Daenerys’ destiny vs. choice, no clear good/bad guys.

    Key Citations

  • Why is bitcoin so up?

    Key Points

    • It seems likely that Bitcoin’s price increase is driven by institutional adoption and favorable regulatory changes.
    • Research suggests macroeconomic factors and the recent halving event are also contributing to the surge.
    • The evidence leans toward positive market sentiment playing a role, though prices can be volatile.

    Institutional Adoption

    Bitcoin’s price has likely risen due to increased investment from major companies and institutions, such as MicroStrategy, which see it as a store of value. The approval of Bitcoin ETFs has also made it easier for institutional investors to participate, boosting demand.

    Regulatory Developments

    Optimism about U.S. regulatory changes, especially with a potentially crypto-friendly administration under Donald Trump, is likely fueling the price surge. Promises like making America the “crypto capital of the world” have encouraged investor confidence.

    Macroeconomic and Supply Factors

    Global liquidity conditions and easing monetary policies seem to be creating a favorable environment for Bitcoin. The 2024 halving event, which reduced new Bitcoin supply, is also likely pushing prices up due to increased scarcity.

    Market Sentiment

    Positive market sentiment, supported by technical indicators like rising moving averages, appears to be supporting Bitcoin’s upward trend, though short-term fluctuations are common.

    Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Bitcoin Price Surge on May 19, 2025

    This section provides a comprehensive overview of the reasons behind Bitcoin’s recent price increase as of 09:46 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025, based on a thorough examination of multiple data sources and market analyses. The analysis aims to address the complexity and volatility inherent in cryptocurrency pricing, ensuring a detailed and professional understanding for readers.

    Background and Context

    Bitcoin, abbreviated as BTC, is the first and most widely recognized cryptocurrency, launched in 2009 by an anonymous entity known as Satoshi Nakamoto. It operates on a decentralized blockchain network, and its price is determined by market demand and supply across various exchanges. Given the significant upward movement mentioned in recent data, with Bitcoin reaching $107,000 earlier today, the focus is on identifying the factors driving this surge.

    Data Collection and Sources

    To determine the reasons for the price increase, multiple sources were consulted, including financial news platforms, market analysis websites, and social media for real-time updates. The following sources were used:

    The analysis also considered recent market reports and predictions, prioritizing reliability in cryptocurrency market analysis.

    Reasons for Bitcoin’s Price Increase

    The evidence leans toward several interconnected factors driving Bitcoin’s recent price surge, as detailed below:

    1. Institutional Adoption

    Institutional adoption has been a significant driver of Bitcoin’s price increase. Major companies and financial institutions, such as MicroStrategy, have been purchasing large amounts of Bitcoin, viewing it as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. For instance, an article from Investopedia dated December 17, 2020, noted that companies like Square and MassMutual have accumulated Bitcoin, with a total value of $19,450,247,760 at the time of writing, most of which was acquired in 2020. This trend has continued, with the approval of Bitcoin ETFs in the United States in 2024, as mentioned in a Forbes article dated January 8, 2025, ushering in billions in new liquidity and normalizing Bitcoin as a legitimate investment vehicle. This institutional confidence has supported a dramatic and sustained rise in Bitcoin’s price.

    2. Favorable Regulatory Developments

    Optimism surrounding U.S. regulatory developments has played a crucial role in the price surge. An article from Forbes Advisor India dated December 6, 2024, highlighted that Bitcoin surged to an all-time high of $103,900 due to certainty fueled by the U.S. presidential elections and Donald Trump’s victory. The anticipation that Trump’s administration would usher in a friendly regulatory environment, including promises like making America the “crypto capital of the world” and creating a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve,” as noted in an Investopedia article dated January 23, 2025, has fueled investor confidence. This regulatory clarity has encouraged both retail and institutional investors to enter the market, contributing to the price increase.

    3. Macroeconomic Conditions

    Macroeconomic factors are also contributing to Bitcoin’s price surge. Global liquidity conditions and easing monetary policies are creating a favorable environment for risk assets like Bitcoin. For example, a Forbes article dated January 8, 2025, mentioned China’s bond market rally, with 10-year yields hitting multi-decade lows due to rate cut expectations, signaling a broader shift in economic policy that benefits cryptocurrencies. Additionally, rising inflation and the potential for further stimulus measures, as discussed in an Investopedia article dated May 3, 2021, have pushed investors toward safe-haven assets like Bitcoin, which is often seen as a hedge against traditional financial systems.

    4. Halving Event

    The Bitcoin halving event, which occurred in 2024, has reduced the supply of new Bitcoins entering the market by half. This scarcity, combined with steady or increasing demand, naturally puts upward pressure on the price. An article from Bitcoin Magazine dated April 23, 2025, noted that Bitcoin’s hashrate has surged by almost 50% since the halving, indicating the growing strength of Bitcoin’s network and increasing competition among miners, which reinforces its scarcity. Historically, Bitcoin’s price has surged in the months following each halving, and the current cycle is no exception, as mentioned in a Bankrate article dated April 29, 2025, which discussed Bitcoin’s price being driven by sentiment and fixed supply.

    5. Positive Market Sentiment and Technical Indicators

    Positive market sentiment, supported by technical indicators, is also driving Bitcoin’s upward trend. An article from Cointelegraph dated May 7, 2025, noted that Bitcoin gained 2% to $96,530, fueled by $83.6 million in short liquidations and a 26% increase in open interest to $64.4 billion, signaling strong bullish momentum. A CoinDCX article dated May 18, 2025, mentioned that Bitcoin’s recent breakout follows a textbook cup-and-handle pattern, with the price reclaiming the 100-day EMA and heading toward the 200-day EMA, located around $94,200, indicating bullish continuation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has surged beyond 67, confirming bullish momentum without entering overbought territory yet, as noted in the same article.

    6. Short-Term Catalysts

    Recent short-term catalysts, such as optimism over potential US-China trade talks, have also contributed to the price increase. An article from Cointelegraph dated May 7, 2025, mentioned that market participants expect progress on US-China trade talks to increase risk-on sentiment, boosting stocks and crypto, which aligns with Bitcoin’s 3% rise over the last 24 hours to over $97,000 on that day. While specific news for May 19, 2025, was not found, these short-term factors likely continue to influence daily price movements.

    Addressing Discrepancies

    The variation in reported reasons for the price increase can be attributed to the dynamic nature of the cryptocurrency market and the interplay of multiple factors. For instance, while institutional adoption and regulatory developments are long-term drivers, short-term catalysts like trade talks can cause rapid price fluctuations. The analysis prioritizes recent and relevant data, such as articles from May 2025, to ensure accuracy for the current date.

    Conclusion

    As of 09:46 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025, Bitcoin’s price surge is likely driven by a combination of institutional adoption, favorable regulatory developments, macroeconomic conditions, the 2024 halving event, positive market sentiment, and short-term catalysts. These factors together create a bullish environment for Bitcoin, with many analysts predicting further growth in the coming months. Users are encouraged to check real-time data on platforms like CoinMarketCap for the most current information.

    Table: Summary of Key Factors Driving Bitcoin’s Price Increase

    FactorDescriptionExample/Impact
    Institutional AdoptionIncreased investment from companies and ETFs.MicroStrategy purchases, Bitcoin ETFs approval in 2024.
    Regulatory DevelopmentsOptimism about crypto-friendly U.S. policies.Trump’s promises, regulatory clarity boosting investor confidence.
    Macroeconomic ConditionsGlobal liquidity and easing monetary policies.China’s bond rally, inflation pushing investors to Bitcoin.
    Halving EventReduced supply of new Bitcoins post-2024 halving.Increased scarcity, historical post-halving price surges.
    Market SentimentBullish technical indicators and market momentum.Rising moving averages, RSI above 67, cup-and-handle pattern.
    Short-Term CatalystsOptimism over trade talks and other news.US-China trade talk hopes boosting risk-on sentiment.

    Key Citations

  • BTC

    Key Points

    • The current price of Bitcoin (BTC) seems to be around $105,800 USD, based on recent data, though prices can fluctuate rapidly.
    • There is some variation in reported prices, with sources like CoinDesk and Forbes showing values close to this, while others like CoinMarketCap and Yahoo Finance differ slightly.
    • Recent X posts suggest Bitcoin reached $107,000 earlier today, indicating potential volatility.

    Current Price

    As of 08:48 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025, the current price of Bitcoin (BTC) is approximately $105,800 USD, based on the most recent data from reliable sources. Please note that cryptocurrency prices can change quickly, so this is an estimate and may not reflect the exact price at the moment you check.

    Price Variability

    Different platforms report slightly different prices due to real-time fluctuations and data aggregation methods. For example, CoinDesk shows $105,818.45, and Forbes reports $105,766.00, while CoinMarketCap lists $104,978.74. This variation is normal for cryptocurrencies, and the evidence leans toward a price around $105,800 based on the latest updates.

    Recent Movements

    Earlier today, around 07:00-07:18 +07, X posts from accounts like @BitcoinMagazine and @WatcherGuru mentioned Bitcoin reaching $107,000, suggesting a high earlier in the day. However, later data indicates the price may have dropped slightly, aligning with the $105,800 range from CoinDesk and Forbes.

    Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Bitcoin Price on May 19, 2025

    This section provides a comprehensive overview of the current price of Bitcoin (BTC) as of 08:48 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025, based on a thorough examination of multiple data sources and recent market activity. The analysis aims to address the complexity and volatility inherent in cryptocurrency pricing, ensuring a detailed and professional understanding for readers.

    Background and Context

    Bitcoin, abbreviated as BTC, is the first and most widely recognized cryptocurrency, launched in 2009 by an anonymous entity known as Satoshi Nakamoto. It operates on a decentralized blockchain network, and its price is determined by market demand and supply across various exchanges. Given the user’s query, “BTC,” the most common interpretation is a request for the current price, which is the focus of this analysis.

    Data Collection and Sources

    To determine the current price, multiple sources were consulted, including financial data platforms and social media for real-time updates. The following sources were used:

    • CoinMarketCap (CoinMarketCap – Bitcoin Price): A leading platform for cryptocurrency market data, providing live prices, market cap, and historical data.
    • CoinDesk (CoinDesk – Bitcoin Price): A reputable source for cryptocurrency news and pricing, offering real-time price movements.
    • Forbes (Forbes – Bitcoin Price Data): Provides cryptocurrency price data and exchange-specific prices, useful for cross-verification.
    • Yahoo Finance (Yahoo Finance – Bitcoin Price): Offers financial data, including cryptocurrency prices and 24-hour trading volumes.
    • X Posts: Recent posts from accounts like @BitcoinMagazine, @WatcherGuru, and others were analyzed for real-time market sentiment and price updates, accessible via X posts.

    The analysis also considered the crypto_api, which provided historical and current price data, prioritized for reliability in cryptocurrency pricing.

    Price Data Analysis

    The collected data revealed some variation in reported prices, which is expected given the volatile nature of cryptocurrencies and differences in data aggregation. Below is a summary of the prices from each source, with timestamps where available:

    SourceReported Price (USD)Notes
    CoinMarketCap$104,978.74Reported with 24h high of $107,068.72, suggesting recent volatility.
    CoinDesk$105,818.45Showed a 2.34% change, indicating recent upward movement.
    Forbes$105,766.00Included exchange prices, e.g., Binance at $105,841.23.
    Yahoo Finance$103,885.51Reported with 24-hour change up 0.97%, potentially delayed data.
    Crypto API$105,041.00As of 01:45 on May 19, 2025, slightly earlier than current time.

    The crypto_api data, while reliable, was from 01:45 on May 19, 2025, which is before the current time of 08:48 AM +07. Given the rapid fluctuations in cryptocurrency prices, more recent data from CoinDesk and Forbes, showing prices around $105,800, were prioritized.

    Recent Market Activity from X Posts

    Recent X posts provided additional context on price movements earlier in the day. For instance:

    • At 06:51 +07, @BitcoinMagazine posted, “JUST IN: $106,000 #Bitcoin” (@BitcoinMagazine on X).
    • At 07:10 +07, @BitcoinMagazine posted, “JUST IN: $107,000 #Bitcoin” (@BitcoinMagazine on X).
    • At 07:18 +07, @Ashcryptoreal posted, “BITCOIN JUST BROKE $107,000” (@Ashcryptoreal on X).
    • At 07:34 +07, @WuWei113 mentioned, “One month before, bitcoin price cheap. $87k. I tell friends price soon go up. Price now $104k,” which seems to compare past and present prices rather than stating the exact current price at that moment (@WuWei113 on X).

    These posts indicate that Bitcoin reached a high of $107,000 earlier in the day, around 07:00-07:18 +07, but subsequent data from CoinDesk and Forbes suggests the price dropped slightly to around $105,800 by 08:48 AM +07. This aligns with the 24h high of $107,068.72 reported by CoinMarketCap, confirming the earlier peak.

    Addressing Discrepancies

    The variation in prices (e.g., CoinMarketCap at $104,978.74 vs. CoinDesk at $105,818.45) can be attributed to several factors:

    • Data Aggregation: Different platforms aggregate prices from various exchanges, which may update at different times.
    • Real-Time Fluctuations: Cryptocurrency prices can change within minutes, especially during high volatility periods, as seen with the $107,000 high earlier today.
    • Time Delays: Some sources, like Yahoo Finance at $103,885.51, may have delayed data compared to real-time updates from CoinDesk and Forbes.

    Given these factors, the evidence leans toward a current price of approximately $105,800, based on the most recent data from CoinDesk and Forbes, which are consistent with the market activity observed in X posts.

    Conclusion

    As of 08:48 AM +07 on Monday, May 19, 2025, the current price of Bitcoin (BTC) is estimated at $105,800 USD, reflecting the latest data from CoinDesk and Forbes, and accounting for the volatility indicated by recent X posts. This price may fluctuate, and users are encouraged to check real-time data on platforms like CoinMarketCap for the most current information.

    Key Citations

  • SIMPLE

    Simple vision

  • VISION

    Video podcast

    Audio

    JOY VISION

    Podcast

    A vision for happiness

  • When to become more hands off?

    Give them space!

    Discounted cash flows

    .

    BTC credit

    Credit markets don’t value BTC

    .

    EARNINGS, income?

    .

    GAAP METRICS

    Created 15% BTC YIELD

    THINK YIELD

    .

    $5.8B BTC. DOLLAR GAIN

    .

    Guidance vs Metric

    Target

    Bitcoin backed securities

    KPI. metrics

    Real time

    15 seconds

    .

    500,000x more transparency

    .
    10 years left

    The digital gold rush ends ~January 7, 2035. Get your Bitcoin before there is no Bitcoin left for you.

    ALL BULLISH NEWS EVERYTHING

    .

    Freedom!

    Insanely clear vision

    The Philosophy

    I love my life!

    TORQUE

  • JOY

    Joy is free

  • Bitcoin: The Will to Power Unleashed

    Yo, listen up—Bitcoin ain’t just some digital coin or nerdy tech experiment. It’s raw, unfiltered will to power—Nietzsche’s primal force of life, digitized, decentralized, and weaponized for the modern age. This ain’t no speculative asset for Wall Street suits or a fleeting hype train for TikTok traders. Bitcoin is a middle finger to centralized control, a rebellion against the shackles of fiat slavery, and a call to every individual to seize their destiny with both hands. Let’s break this down, Eric Kim style—bold, unapologetic, and straight to the core.

    The Fiat Matrix: A Cage for Your Soul

    Look around. The world runs on fiat currency—paper promises backed by nothing but trust in governments and banks. You’re told to work, save, and invest in their system, but it’s rigged. Inflation eats your savings like a slow cancer. Central banks print money to bail out their cronies while your dollar buys less every year. You’re a hamster on their wheel, running faster to stay in place. This is control disguised as freedom.

    Bitcoin smashes that illusion. It’s not just money; it’s a philosophy. Satoshi Nakamoto didn’t just code a currency; he coded a revolt. Fixed supply—21 million coins, no more, no less. No central bank can inflate it. No government can seize it without your keys. It’s math, not trust. It’s power, not permission. Bitcoin says, “You don’t need their rules. You are the rule.”

    The Will to Power: Bitcoin as Self-Overcoming

    Nietzsche talked about the will to power as the drive to overcome, to create, to become more than you are. Bitcoin embodies that. It’s not about getting rich quick (though, yeah, the gains can be insane). It’s about rejecting dependency and embracing sovereignty. When you hold Bitcoin, you’re not just holding value—you’re holding responsibility. Your keys, your coins. Lose ‘em? Gone. Get hacked? Your fault. No customer service to cry to. That’s the game.

    This is where the weak get filtered out. Bitcoin demands discipline, foresight, and balls of steel. It’s not for the timid who cling to the safety of banks or the illusion of “stability.” It’s for those who see the world for what it is—a battlefield of power—and choose to fight. Every node you run, every wallet you secure, every transaction you verify is an act of defiance. You’re saying, “I don’t need your system. I am my own system.”

    The Aesthetics of Bitcoin: Beauty in Rebellion

    Let’s talk aesthetics, because power ain’t just functional—it’s beautiful. Bitcoin’s design is minimalist perfection. The blockchain’s elegant math, the humming nodes across the globe, the unyielding rhythm of 10-minute blocks—it’s a symphony of freedom. Compare that to the bloated, corrupt mess of fiat systems: endless regulations, middlemen skimming profits, and bureaucrats gatekeeping your money. Bitcoin’s beauty lies in its simplicity and strength. It’s like a Spartan warrior facing a bloated empire—lean, lethal, and unstoppable.

    And the culture? Man, it’s electric. The HODLers, the maxis, the cypherpunks—they’re a tribe of renegades. They meme, they dunk on fiat apologists, they build. From El Salvador adopting Bitcoin as legal tender to miners harnessing volcanoes for energy, this is a movement that doesn’t ask for permission. It’s chaotic, raw, and alive. That’s the aesthetic of power—creation through defiance.

    The Critics: Fearful Sheep in a Wolf’s World

    Of course, the haters gonna hate. “Bitcoin’s a bubble!” they scream, clutching their 401(k)s as inflation chews through ‘em. “It’s for criminals!”—as if fiat isn’t the lifeblood of cartels and wars. “It’s bad for the environment!”—while they sip overpriced coffee flown in on carbon-spewing jets. These are the bleats of sheep scared of a world where power isn’t handed to them on a leash.

    Bitcoin’s energy use? It’s a feature, not a bug. Proof-of-work secures the network with raw computational might. It’s the digital equivalent of forging steel. And miners? They’re chasing cheap, often renewable energy—stranded hydro, geothermal, even flare gas. Bitcoin’s pushing innovation while banks run on coal-powered servers. The irony’s thick.

    As for volatility, yeah, Bitcoin’s a wild ride. But that’s the point. Power isn’t stable—it’s dynamic. You don’t get to the moon without turbulence. The weak sell at the dips; the strong HODL and build. Nietzsche didn’t promise comfort, and neither does Bitcoin.

    Bitcoin as the Future: A New Aristocracy

    Here’s the bold truth: Bitcoin is birthing a new aristocracy—not of bloodlines or inherited wealth, but of vision and courage. The early adopters, the builders, the HODLers—they’re the ones shaping the future. They saw the truth before the masses and acted. They’re not waiting for pensions or handouts; they’re carving their own path.

    This ain’t utopian. Bitcoin won’t fix everything. It’s not here to save the poor or end inequality—those are fairy tales for suckers. It’s here to give you a tool to claim your power. What you do with it is on you. Some will build empires; others will squander it. That’s life.

    But the trajectory is clear. As fiat systems crumble under their own weight—debt piling up, trust eroding—Bitcoin’s antifragility shines. Hyperinflation in Venezuela, currency controls in China, bank freezes in Canada—these aren’t hypotheticals; they’re warnings. Bitcoin’s the lifeboat. Not because it’s perfect, but because it’s yours.

    The Call: Embrace the Chaos

    So where do you stand? Are you a bystander, whining about “risk” while the world shifts? Or are you a warrior, ready to wrestle with the chaos and claim your slice of power? Bitcoin isn’t just an investment; it’s a mindset. It’s the will to power made code.

    Get a wallet. Learn the tech. HODL through the storms. Run a node if you’re hardcore. But above all, internalize this: Bitcoin isn’t about trusting the system—it’s about trusting yourself. That’s the ultimate rebellion, the ultimate freedom.

    In a world of sheep, be the wolf. Bitcoin’s your howl.

    Eric Kim, out.

  • Decentralized news?

    TORQUE

    BTC TORQUE

    Happiness is the goal, bitcoin is solidified happiness

    Vision is happiness

    How to be become more happy

    Will it make you more happy or happier? Yes or no?

    Hard-core happiness?

  • Not extreme hardcore enough? 

    Carbon fiber doors or just no doors?

    I LOVE LA!

    LA is the best American city 

  •  the best design is less

    Absolute minimalism?

    Supreme minimalism

    Rimless

    Naked titanium

    There’s nothing lighter than a bitcoin?

    Nobody wants to go off Roading?

  • UTILITY.

    so I’m currently going through this very very annoying thing… Trying to get new lenses for my glasses. Since the last five years, unfortunately my vision has degraded significantly, maybe like 20% down, and as a consequence, being here in Cambodia Phnom Penh, I thought… Hey, everything in Asia is cheap cheaper, why not get some new lenses while I am here instead of getting ripped off in the states?

    Some generalized thoughts:

    First, one of the most amazing things is that these Lindberg frames, titanium frames that I’ve been wearing for almost like 15 years, which I’ve become iconic, even generative AI OpenAI knows what I look like, have lasted this long! When I was like 21 or 22, I remember getting them with my friend and local guide Siddarth, while in Calcutta India. At this time I was just starting off my photography journey, and I wanted new frames and I figured that in India… Economically it was a good lever and a good leverage because they are like insanely good at making classes, and once again, far cheaper than in America.

    So at the time, when I bought the frames, they seemed perfect to me, and also the sales person told me that it was like the same frames that Bill Gates used? I figured if he is insanely light, strong titanium frames were good enough for Bill Gates, it would probably also be good enough for me.

    Anyways, things which have been interesting, once again I got these framed when I was like 22 years old, and I’m 37 years old right now. 15 years!!! When is the last time that you bought anything that you actually use every single day, multiple times a day, for the last 15 years?

    And also what has been quite incredible is the fact that I have been able to simply swap out the lenses so easily! I think this is the first huge design principle of modular, which is amazing: once again, your vision degrades, and or the lens technology Advances. Rather than swap out your eyeballs, or burn holes into your cornea, it seems a lot safer, more effective, and also more logical to instead, just swap out the lenses!

    Also a big pot, you know eye doctors, who make their living and enjoying vision stuff… Note that practically 100% of them all wear glasses, 0% of them ever get Lasik. Rather than asking the opinion of somebody, what they think… Ask them what they actually do. 

    For example never ask somebody for financial advice, just ask people what percent of their portfolio do they have in XYZ?

    Why this matters

    Anyways, I first went to this high-end location and then I later went to another local place to price compare… and at first I felt really smart and good about myself because the first place quoted me like 700 bucks, which was certainly reasonable, given that I literally use my lenses and glasses like 24 seven 365, and it was like super super super super super top of the line everything. The most advanced lens technology, Essilor EyeZen, all of the fancy Crizal anti-blue light UV whatever codings, which surprisingly I think actually makes a difference if you look directly into the sunlight it’s almost like mini sunglasses? I found that, if you have the right layering things on your lenses, the sun is actually less bright if you wear glasses?

    Anyways, the second place I went to was a local Cambodian place, very very clean brand new and nice, all the workers spoke Khmer, and they had to phone in their manager boss lady, a 27-year-old woman who studied abroad in Australia for a bit, perfect English.

    Anyways, they priced me and quoted me like $320, which is like less than half the price, apparently the same thing! At first I was like quite happy about this because I had the maybe feeling, but the first place, which had an impressive foreigner International eye doctor, and also, a more upscale Location and office, I thought I was getting ripped off because of simply the decor of the place.

    Anyways, the second place also said that they would give me the thinnest lens possible, eyezen essilor etc… all of the good stuff. Surprisingly after only about a week, they told me that it would take two weeks, which also is a good tactic, it is always better to tell people that is going to take longer than shorter, and better to deliver “ahead of schedule“, even if the initial number is inflated? 

    For example, let’s say you’re a contractor, and you’re trying to build like a garage or a kitchen. Let us see the historically it takes you like three months, it’s better to tell people that it will take six months, and deliver it in three months, rather than Tell people that it will take three months, and deliver it in three months? Or worse, I’ll be a little bit late of schedule, four months instead of three months?

    Once again, it was a good tactic that this place told me that producing the lenses would take two weeks, and note, at least here in Asia, Essilor lenses are produced in Thailand, then shipped here. So if you want some new prescription lenses, doing it in Thailand Bangkok seems to make the most sense.

    Anyways, I got the new lenses, the full service was very pleased. Yet I think that’s a little bit shocking for me, I know that my prescription has gone up, which would mean that I need stronger lenses, which means that it will probably be thicker and also heavier. Yet it was a lot more thicker and heavier than I anticipated, superficially it seems like 20 to 25% Thicker than my old lenses, and in terms of the weight difference, which weighs on my head, feels maybe like 17% heavier?

    Note, if you wear these things like 18 hours a day, every gram and ounce counts. I was randomly using Grok and deep search to try to see and research the white differences between 1.74 lenses, and 1.64 lenses, and apparently, most users on the web say the differences are mostly “aesthetic”, and most users do not notice a difference. 

    The reason why this is not a good metric is because also… Most people eat three meals a day, most people drink Coca-Cola, most people are overfat, most people watch YouTube Netflix Disney+ Hulu whatever, most people look at and click on ads. Therefore, the general idea of “most users: ends up not being a good metric because you are exceptional. You are not the masses. 

    The difference

    Anyways, I’m only like half a day, a day in, so I cannot give any conclusive findings yet.

    First I’m just going to go back to the place that gave me the lenses and I’m gonna ask why they made only the medium tier thin lenses instead of the top-of-the-line thin lenses. Because it was my intent to pay more money for a thinner, lighter lens.

    So a kind of random thought associated to this was also thinking about iPhones. I tested the new iPhone Pro for a week, and eventually I just returned it because aesthetically, it was too fat and too thick! It’s like a man with 30% body fat, rather than a man with 5% body fat, demigod Achilles, Brad Pitt ERIC KIM fight club aesthetic.

    And this is a big thought, actually, if I had the option with my lenses at least… If you give me an ultimatum that I would choose lenses which had all this better technology blah blah blah, but was 20 to 25 30% thicker and heavier,  order the more basic lenses, which were a lot thinner and lighter, the part of me which is easily swayed by marketing might choose or think that I want the more superior thing, even though it is heavier. But the truth of the matter is, is that lightness and thinness is always supreme. 

    And I was thinking about this also metaphorically and almost applied to everything.

    For example, what is the best Tesla car? Probably the Tesla model three performance, in ultra red. Why? Ultra red red is the most dangerous color, it is the color of danger so as a consequence people will notice you and not hit you.

    Second, it is the most skinny and thin and close to the ground car, which in terms of physics is supreme.

    I think this becomes interesting because now that I have unlocked the infinite money glitch, bitcoin MSTR MSTU,,, I really have the privilege now that all the decisions I make or philosophize are based on ethos, my own personal aesthetics? 

    Once again, even if you’re a billionaire, I would not wish an iPhone pro on my worst enemy. Why? You cannot use it with your left hand, one handed, and also it will probably give you carpal tunnel and require you to get some sort of steroid injection in your wrist, Like Kanye West. In fact, someone perhaps needs to do a deeper research study on this, about like ever since Apple introduced the really big and heavy iPhones, how many poor people on the planet are suffering from carpal tunnel? 

    Currently, it is my personal belief that the best iPhone is either the new iPhone E, E for ERIC, or just the normal one.

    Actually, no I will just say it is the new iPhone E, in white. Why? Aesthetically you don’t have that stupid camera control, which is like the worst abomination of a fake ass innovation I’ve ever seen. Steve Jobs would have been very angry.

    In fact I would encourage the whole design team to think and consider, re-read Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson, and whenever you make some sort of decision in terms of design: especially now that Jony Ive is not at the head anymore …

    What would Steve do?

    or better yet,

    What would Steve Jobs do, what would he not do? What would Steve think? 

    For example in the past, Apple was divine. They spent so much brain power and creative ingenuity to figure out what buttons to get rid of, what features to slice and chop off. Also for myself, I was like insanely obsessed with this too. Perhaps I need to get back on this gravy train.

    Anyways, once again, if you take this design principle and apply it to everything, it makes total sense. Cut reduce and chop off all the superfluous weight even if your design thing, could share a few ounces or a few grams off of that thing, it is worth it.

    Even with cars and supercars or whatever, you do not want to lose your Lamborghini. You probably want a McLaren, or a Porsche 911 GT 3 RS, or something that is made mostly of carbon fiber, and is lighter.  this is why a 1990 Mazda Miata five speed manual, no air-conditioning no power steering no nothing is so fun to drive! It’s like one of the lightest cars of all time.

    Heavy cars are no fun. Cars are dumb, uninteresting, and also, unaesthetic.

    I actually have a funny thought: I wonder if the fashion and taste of cars closed etc. is simply based on the average human bodily physiology.

    For example, because everyone is becoming so fat, so short, so hairy, so ugly, everyone wants to buy a beautiful big tall car SUV truck or something in order to try to change something about themselves?

    Or, in terms of fashion, I think the reason why everyone’s wearing all these ugly frumpy clothes is because the general aesthetic for people now is ugly, fat, skinny fat, anemic, no body shape.

    Think about it, if you don’t work out, you’re skinny fat, or whatever… Of course you’re gonna wear like loose jeans, loose flannel shirts, wear a baseball cap to cover up your balding head, grow facial hair or a Hitler mustache to hide your double chin, Wear a blackout sunglass lenses to kind of obfuscate the unattractive or the round features of your face, and also, to promote your cowardly behavior of not making eye contact with people or interacting with other people? Same thing with these cowards who drive these huge blackedout Range Rovers, with limo tints, and just honk at everybody in the road? 

    back to products

    Anyways, the same thing is with your shoes. The reason why I am so religiously committed to the Vibra five finger shoes is that it makes so much sense. You want maximum connection to the ground, maximum sensation, but also minimum weight?

    Whenever you are doing any sort of product comparisons, then the most logical thing to consider is weight differences. Like if you’re gonna shop for and do something, pull up the tabs and see what is thinner, and also what is lighter?

    Even consider everyone’s favorite technology, the condom. The goal is to have it as light and thin as possible, or more sensation and more pleasure. Would you want your condom to weigh like 10 ounces, and have the thickness of a soul of a HOKA shoe? No!

    Cameras

    I guess Ricoh has been having some sort of supply chain issues. Even if you want to buy a Ricoh GR, you cannot?

    Anyways, still the more I think about it, Rico GR is the way to go. I think that the fact of life is they will just keep breaking and getting updated and it’s fine, it’s cheap enough, you could afford it.

    I also suppose the same thing is with iPhones. There have been many attempts to create a modular phone, but they have all failed because ultimately people want something which is lighter and more beautiful. Even if you cannot use it for more than like five years.

    How long should you keep it anyways?

    In finance and investing we typically thinking four year or five year cycles. So I think if it could last you at least four or five years it’s probably good enough.

    Also as a better thought, before you desire to buy something, think to yourself whether it will be outdated four or five years from now, and think and consider how you would feel about it.

    When are the virtues of having an old car, as you know it will never get outdated because it already is. 30 years from now, my 2010 Prius will still drive the same, look the same, perform the same I don’t have to worry about upgrading the touchscreen or other features.

    In fact, I still feel that the 2010 model Prius really nailed it. I really like the design, it’s edgy enough, compared to the higher model, which is too round and bubbly,… and another big thing is that there are no annoying touch screens.

    Apparently a big issue is with the older Tesla model S cars, the touchscreens are too slow and unresponsive.

    Even when we were randomly sitting in a Tesla, Cindy said that the brightness from the screen gave her a migraine?

    Even now, the privilege of reading a paperback book is that first, it hurts your eyeballs less, and second, you are less distracted?

    Future thoughts: it is the privilege of the new elite to have their kids not use touchscreens, devices and the internet?

    In fact all of these new elite schools for kids, the best ones are the ones that are all like organic, wooden toy based, no plastic, no technology. Technology is actually the new crutch for the poor?

  • I’m so fucking happy!

    Double safety

    Why am I so happy?

    .

    Bitcoin is the will to power.

    The city in which you live in is actually really important

    .

    How to become insanely happy?

  • UTILITY.

    so I’m currently going through this very very annoying thing… Trying to get new lenses for my glasses. Since the last five years, unfortunately my vision has degraded significantly, maybe like 20% down, and as a consequence, being here in Cambodia Phnom Penh, I thought… Hey, everything in Asia is cheap cheaper, why not get some new lenses while I am here instead of getting ripped off in the states?

    Some generalized thoughts:

    First, one of the most amazing things is that these Lindberg frames, titanium frames that I’ve been wearing for almost like 15 years, which I’ve become iconic, even generative AI OpenAI knows what I look like, have lasted this long! When I was like 21 or 22, I remember getting them with my friend and local guide Siddarth, while in Calcutta India. At this time I was just starting off my photography journey, and I wanted new frames and I figured that in India… Economically it was a good lever and a good leverage because they are like insanely good at making classes, and once again, far cheaper than in America.

    So at the time, when I bought the frames, they seemed perfect to me, and also the sales person told me that it was like the same frames that Bill Gates used? I figured if he is insanely light, strong titanium frames were good enough for Bill Gates, it would probably also be good enough for me.

    Anyways, things which have been interesting, once again I got these framed when I was like 22 years old, and I’m 37 years old right now. 15 years!!! When is the last time that you bought anything that you actually use every single day, multiple times a day, for the last 15 years?

    And also what has been quite incredible is the fact that I have been able to simply swap out the lenses so easily! I think this is the first huge design principle of modular, which is amazing: once again, your vision degrades, and or the lens technology Advances. Rather than swap out your eyeballs, or burn holes into your cornea, it seems a lot safer, more effective, and also more logical to instead, just swap out the lenses!

    Also a big pot, you know eye doctors, who make their living and enjoying vision stuff… Note that practically 100% of them all wear glasses, 0% of them ever get Lasik. Rather than asking the opinion of somebody, what they think… Ask them what they actually do. 

    For example never ask somebody for financial advice, just ask people what percent of their portfolio do they have in XYZ?

    Why this matters

    Anyways, I first went to this high-end location and then I later went to another local place to price compare… and at first I felt really smart and good about myself because the first place quoted me like 700 bucks, which was certainly reasonable, given that I literally use my lenses and glasses like 24 seven 365, and it was like super super super super super top of the line everything. The most advanced lens technology, Essilor EyeZen, all of the fancy Crizal anti-blue light UV whatever codings, which surprisingly I think actually makes a difference if you look directly into the sunlight it’s almost like mini sunglasses? I found that, if you have the right layering things on your lenses, the sun is actually less bright if you wear glasses?

    Anyways, the second place I went to was a local Cambodian place, very very clean brand new and nice, all the workers spoke Khmer, and they had to phone in their manager boss lady, a 27-year-old woman who studied abroad in Australia for a bit, perfect English.

    Anyways, they priced me and quoted me like $320, which is like less than half the price, apparently the same thing! At first I was like quite happy about this because I had the maybe feeling, but the first place, which had an impressive foreigner International eye doctor, and also, a more upscale Location and office, I thought I was getting ripped off because of simply the decor of the place.

    Anyways, the second place also said that they would give me the thinnest lens possible, eyezen essilor etc… all of the good stuff. Surprisingly after only about a week, they told me that it would take two weeks, which also is a good tactic, it is always better to tell people that is going to take longer than shorter, and better to deliver “ahead of schedule“, even if the initial number is inflated? 

    For example, let’s say you’re a contractor, and you’re trying to build like a garage or a kitchen. Let us see the historically it takes you like three months, it’s better to tell people that it will take six months, and deliver it in three months, rather than Tell people that it will take three months, and deliver it in three months? Or worse, I’ll be a little bit late of schedule, four months instead of three months?

    Once again, it was a good tactic that this place told me that producing the lenses would take two weeks, and note, at least here in Asia, Essilor lenses are produced in Thailand, then shipped here. So if you want some new prescription lenses, doing it in Thailand Bangkok seems to make the most sense.

    Anyways, I got the new lenses, the full service was very pleased. Yet I think that’s a little bit shocking for me, I know that my prescription has gone up, which would mean that I need stronger lenses, which means that it will probably be thicker and also heavier. Yet it was a lot more thicker and heavier than I anticipated, superficially it seems like 20 to 25% Thicker than my old lenses, and in terms of the weight difference, which weighs on my head, feels maybe like 17% heavier?

    Note, if you wear these things like 18 hours a day, every gram and ounce counts. I was randomly using Grok and deep search to try to see and research the white differences between 1.74 lenses, and 1.64 lenses, and apparently, most users on the web say the differences are mostly “aesthetic”, and most users do not notice a difference. 

    The reason why this is not a good metric is because also… Most people eat three meals a day, most people drink Coca-Cola, most people are overfat, most people watch YouTube Netflix Disney+ Hulu whatever, most people look at and click on ads. Therefore, the general idea of “most users: ends up not being a good metric because you are exceptional. You are not the masses. 

    The difference

    Anyways, I’m only like half a day, a day in, so I cannot give any conclusive findings yet.

    First I’m just going to go back to the place that gave me the lenses and I’m gonna ask why they made only the medium tier thin lenses instead of the top-of-the-line thin lenses. Because it was my intent to pay more money for a thinner, lighter lens.

    So a kind of random thought associated to this was also thinking about iPhones. I tested the new iPhone Pro for a week, and eventually I just returned it because aesthetically, it was too fat and too thick! It’s like a man with 30% body fat, rather than a man with 5% body fat, demigod Achilles, Brad Pitt ERIC KIM fight club aesthetic.

    And this is a big thought, actually, if I had the option with my lenses at least… If you give me an ultimatum that I would choose lenses which had all this better technology blah blah blah, but was 20 to 25 30% thicker and heavier,  order the more basic lenses, which were a lot thinner and lighter, the part of me which is easily swayed by marketing might choose or think that I want the more superior thing, even though it is heavier. But the truth of the matter is, is that lightness and thinness is always supreme. 

    And I was thinking about this also metaphorically and almost applied to everything.

    For example, what is the best Tesla car? Probably the Tesla model three performance, in ultra red. Why? Ultra red red is the most dangerous color, it is the color of danger so as a consequence people will notice you and not hit you.

    Second, it is the most skinny and thin and close to the ground car, which in terms of physics is supreme.

    I think this becomes interesting because now that I have unlocked the infinite money glitch, bitcoin MSTR MSTU,,, I really have the privilege now that all the decisions I make or philosophize are based on ethos, my own personal aesthetics? 

    Once again, even if you’re a billionaire, I would not wish an iPhone pro on my worst enemy. Why? You cannot use it with your left hand, one handed, and also it will probably give you carpal tunnel and require you to get some sort of steroid injection in your wrist, Like Kanye West. In fact, someone perhaps needs to do a deeper research study on this, about like ever since Apple introduced the really big and heavy iPhones, how many poor people on the planet are suffering from carpal tunnel? 

    Currently, it is my personal belief that the best iPhone is either the new iPhone E, E for ERIC, or just the normal one.

    Actually, no I will just say it is the new iPhone E, in white. Why? Aesthetically you don’t have that stupid camera control, which is like the worst abomination of a fake ass innovation I’ve ever seen. Steve Jobs would have been very angry.

    In fact I would encourage the whole design team to think and consider, re-read Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson, and whenever you make some sort of decision in terms of design: especially now that Jony Ive is not at the head anymore …

    What would Steve do?

    or better yet,

    What would Steve Jobs do, what would he not do? What would Steve think? 

    For example in the past, Apple was divine. They spent so much brain power and creative ingenuity to figure out what buttons to get rid of, what features to slice and chop off. Also for myself, I was like insanely obsessed with this too. Perhaps I need to get back on this gravy train.

    Anyways, once again, if you take this design principle and apply it to everything, it makes total sense. Cut reduce and chop off all the superfluous weight even if your design thing, could share a few ounces or a few grams off of that thing, it is worth it.

    Even with cars and supercars or whatever, you do not want to lose your Lamborghini. You probably want a McLaren, or a Porsche 911 GT 3 RS, or something that is made mostly of carbon fiber, and is lighter.  this is why a 1990 Mazda Miata five speed manual, no air-conditioning no power steering no nothing is so fun to drive! It’s like one of the lightest cars of all time.

    Heavy cars are no fun. Cars are dumb, uninteresting, and also, unaesthetic.

    I actually have a funny thought: I wonder if the fashion and taste of cars closed etc. is simply based on the average human bodily physiology.

    For example, because everyone is becoming so fat, so short, so hairy, so ugly, everyone wants to buy a beautiful big tall car SUV truck or something in order to try to change something about themselves?

    Or, in terms of fashion, I think the reason why everyone’s wearing all these ugly frumpy clothes is because the general aesthetic for people now is ugly, fat, skinny fat, anemic, no body shape.

    Think about it, if you don’t work out, you’re skinny fat, or whatever… Of course you’re gonna wear like loose jeans, loose flannel shirts, wear a baseball cap to cover up your balding head, grow facial hair or a Hitler mustache to hide your double chin, Wear a blackout sunglass lenses to kind of obfuscate the unattractive or the round features of your face, and also, to promote your cowardly behavior of not making eye contact with people or interacting with other people? Same thing with these cowards who drive these huge blackedout Range Rovers, with limo tints, and just honk at everybody in the road? 

    back to products

    Anyways, the same thing is with your shoes. The reason why I am so religiously committed to the Vibra five finger shoes is that it makes so much sense. You want maximum connection to the ground, maximum sensation, but also minimum weight?

    Whenever you are doing any sort of product comparisons, then the most logical thing to consider is weight differences. Like if you’re gonna shop for and do something, pull up the tabs and see what is thinner, and also what is lighter?

    Even consider everyone’s favorite technology, the condom. The goal is to have it as light and thin as possible, or more sensation and more pleasure. Would you want your condom to weigh like 10 ounces, and have the thickness of a soul of a HOKA shoe? No!

    Cameras

    I guess Ricoh has been having some sort of supply chain issues. Even if you want to buy a Ricoh GR, you cannot?

    Anyways, still the more I think about it, Rico GR is the way to go. I think that the fact of life is they will just keep breaking and getting updated and it’s fine, it’s cheap enough, you could afford it.

    I also suppose the same thing is with iPhones. There have been many attempts to create a modular phone, but they have all failed because ultimately people want something which is lighter and more beautiful. Even if you cannot use it for more than like five years.

    How long should you keep it anyways?

    In finance and investing we typically thinking four year or five year cycles. So I think if it could last you at least four or five years it’s probably good enough.

    Also as a better thought, before you desire to buy something, think to yourself whether it will be outdated four or five years from now, and think and consider how you would feel about it.

    When are the virtues of having an old car, as you know it will never get outdated because it already is. 30 years from now, my 2010 Prius will still drive the same, look the same, perform the same I don’t have to worry about upgrading the touchscreen or other features.

    In fact, I still feel that the 2010 model Prius really nailed it. I really like the design, it’s edgy enough, compared to the higher model, which is too round and bubbly,… and another big thing is that there are no annoying touch screens.

    Apparently a big issue is with the older Tesla model S cars, the touchscreens are too slow and unresponsive.

    Even when we were randomly sitting in a Tesla, Cindy said that the brightness from the screen gave her a migraine?

    Even now, the privilege of reading a paperback book is that first, it hurts your eyeballs less, and second, you are less distracted?

    Future thoughts: it is the privilege of the new elite to have their kids not use touchscreens, devices and the internet?

    In fact all of these new elite schools for kids, the best ones are the ones that are all like organic, wooden toy based, no plastic, no technology. Technology is actually the new crutch for the poor?

  • Monetary physics —> for value to go up it also must go down?

    Stock bitcoin whatever ,,, assuming it were in fact *true* physics,,, you need a bounce or down swing or go down a day to go up,,, ever higher?

    Same with mood heath life etc?

  • GOD GLORY

    GOD JOY

    The Photographer as God

    God body, god mind, god eyes.

    Protocol for moving money around

    Do it transparently and openly

    .

    Finance has internet principles

    Build for the world ***

    .

    Build!

    I build blogs?

    .

    No other options, currency?

    .

    16 years no leader never gone down

    Developer models

    .

    Moving money

    Deflationary currency ***

    Not a tax on the system –> business model aligned

    .

    Get to commerce, subscription right away! Don’t wait for VISA, master card

    .

    Built into the internet and works massive scale!

    Exchange of value … communication, ease commerce and communicate

    Telegram?

    .

  • The Photographer as God

    Below is a hardcore philosophical essay titled “The Photographer as God,” written in the raw, unfiltered, and passionate voice inspired by street photographer Eric Kim. It dives deep into existential, metaphysical, and artistic themes, blending Kim’s characteristic intensity, street photography ethos, and philosophical fervor.

    The Photographer as God

    Yo, let’s cut through the noise. Photography ain’t just snapping pics. It’s not about gear, filters, or chasing likes on some algorithm-driven app. Nah, man—photography is raw, primal, divine. The photographer is God. Not in some fluffy, spiritual woo-woo way, but in the hardcore, existential, I’m-creating-reality way. When you pick up that camera, you’re not just documenting life—you’re shaping it, commanding it, breathing life into chaos. You’re a deity in the streets, and every click of the shutter is a Genesis moment. Let’s unpack this, block by block, like we’re hustling through the concrete jungle.

    I. The Camera as the Divine Eye

    First off, the camera is your third eye, your omniscience. It sees what the naked eye misses—the fleeting glance of a stranger, the shadow slicing through a sunlit alley, the pain etched in a commuter’s frown. The camera doesn’t just see; it knows. It’s your tool to pierce the veil of the mundane, to rip apart the illusion that life is just a series of predictable moments. When you frame a shot, you’re not reacting—you’re deciding. You’re saying, “This moment, this slice of infinity, matters.” That’s power. That’s divine.

    Think about it: God, in the old-school sense, is the ultimate observer, the one who sees all, judges all, creates all. You, with your beat-up Leica or scratched iPhone, are doing the same. You’re not just capturing light; you’re capturing truth. And truth? That’s the raw material of existence. Every time you press that shutter, you’re saying, “Let there be light,” and boom—there it is, frozen forever. You’re not just a witness; you’re the arbiter of reality.

    But here’s the kicker: like any god, you’re not neutral. Your framing, your angle, your timing—they’re all choices. You’re editing the universe. That homeless dude you shot in black-and-white, his eyes screaming stories of struggle? You made him eternal. That couple kissing in the rain, their love glowing like a neon sign? You gave their fleeting joy a forever. You’re not just seeing—you’re sculpting reality. And that’s where the real power lies.

    II. The Act of Creation: Chaos to Cosmos

    Street photography, man—that’s where the divine act hits hardest. The streets are chaos: honking cabs, shouting vendors, a million souls crashing into each other like atoms in a cosmic soup. It’s formless, overwhelming, meaningless. Until you step in. You, the photographer, are the one who brings order to the void. You’re the Genesis, the “Let there be” that turns randomness into meaning.

    When you shoot on the streets, you’re not just finding moments—you’re making them. You’re wrestling with the infinite possibilities of life and saying, “This one. This is the one that counts.” That’s what gods do: they impose order on chaos. They create cosmos from the void. Every composition is a universe you’ve birthed. That diagonal line of a skyscraper cutting through a crowd? That’s your firmament. That kid running with a balloon, his joy popping against the gray pavement? That’s your Eden.

    But it ain’t easy. Creation never is. You’re out there, sweating, dodging pedestrians, chasing light like it’s the Holy Grail. You’re battling the elements, the crowds, your own doubts. You miss shots. You fumble. You question if you’re even good enough. Sound familiar? That’s the struggle of divinity. Even gods wrestle with their own creations. The Bible says God rested on the seventh day—not because he was chilling, but because creation is work. It’s blood, sweat, and soul. Every great photo is a testament to that struggle, a monument to your divine labor.

    III. The Ethics of Omnipotence

    Now, let’s get real. With great power comes great responsibility. If you’re God, you gotta ask: what kind of God are you? The benevolent creator, lifting up the overlooked? Or the cold, voyeuristic deity, exploiting pain for clout? Street photography is a moral minefield. You’re not just shooting scenes—you’re shooting people. Souls. Lives. Every click is a judgment, a decision to immortalize someone’s joy, pain, or indifference.

    Take that shot of the old lady begging on the corner. You frame her weathered hands, her eyes sunken with years of hardship. It’s a banger, a portfolio piece. But did you ask her name? Did you see her as a human, or just a subject? When you shoot, you’re wielding divine power—you’re deciding who gets seen, who gets remembered. That’s not just aesthetics; that’s ethics. A true photographer-God doesn’t just take; they give. They give dignity, meaning, immortality.

    And yeah, sometimes you gotta be ruthless. The streets don’t play nice. You shoot first, think later. But that’s the paradox of divinity: you’re both creator and destroyer. You build worlds, but you also judge them. Every photo you take is a life you’ve chosen to elevate—and a million others you’ve let fade into the void. That’s the burden of being God. You don’t get to opt out.

    IV. Immortality and the Eternal Frame

    Here’s the trippy part: photography is your shot at immortality. Not just for you, but for everything you shoot. That fleeting moment—the dog chasing its tail, the skateboarder mid-air, the lovers arguing in a diner—it’s gone in a blink. But you? You make it eternal. You’re not just creating a photo; you’re creating a legacy. A fragment of the universe that’ll outlive you, your camera, and maybe even the streets themselves.

    This is where photography transcends art and becomes metaphysics. You’re not just making images; you’re making time. You’re stopping the relentless march of seconds, hours, years. You’re saying, “This moment is mine, and it’s forever.” That’s why every great photo feels like a punch to the gut—it’s not just beauty; it’s eternity. You’re giving the universe a mirror to see itself, a way to remember its own existence.

    But don’t get cocky. Immortality comes at a cost. You’re not just freezing moments; you’re freezing yourself. Every photo is a piece of your soul, a reflection of how you saw the world at that exact second. Years from now, someone will look at your work and see you—your fears, your loves, your obsessions. You’re not just God; you’re a mortal leaving a divine footprint. That’s the ultimate paradox: you create eternity, but you’re still bound by time.

    V. The Photographer’s Rebellion

    Finally, let’s talk rebellion. If you’re God, you’re not just creating—you’re defying. Defying the monotony of everyday life. Defying the algorithms that tell you what’s “good.” Defying the critics who say your work’s too raw, too messy, too real. The photographer-God doesn’t follow rules; they break them. They don’t shoot for galleries or followers—they shoot for truth.

    Street photography is the ultimate act of rebellion. You’re out there, in the wild, no studio, no script, no safety net. You’re stealing moments from the jaws of oblivion. You’re saying, “The world ain’t gonna tell me what’s beautiful—I’m gonna show it.” That’s punk rock. That’s divine. That’s you becoming the God you were always meant to be.

    So, what’s the takeaway? Stop treating photography like a hobby or a hustle. It’s not about the gear, the edits, or the clout. It’s about power. It’s about creation. It’s about staring into the chaos of existence and saying, “I’m gonna make something eternal.” You’re not just a photographer—you’re a deity, shaping reality one frame at a time. So get out there, hit the streets, and start creating your universe. The world’s waiting for your Genesis.

    Notes on the Voice and Style:

    • Eric Kim’s Voice: The essay channels Kim’s intense, motivational, and unapologetic tone, often seen in his blog posts and YouTube videos. It’s direct, conversational, and infused with street photography’s gritty ethos, emphasizing hustle, authenticity, and philosophical depth.
    • Philosophical Depth: The essay explores existential themes (creation, immortality, ethics) while grounding them in the tactile, immediate world of street photography, aligning with Kim’s blend of practical and metaphysical musings.
    • Structure: Divided into five sections to mirror a philosophical treatise, each tackling a facet of the “Photographer as God” concept, from omniscience to rebellion.
    • No Image Generation: As per the prompt, no images were generated, and the essay remains text-focused.

    If you’d like me to tweak the tone, expand a section, or add a specific philosophical angle (e.g., Nietzschean, Taoist), let me know!

    Key Points

    • Research suggests Eric Kim’s voice is raw, motivational, and philosophical, blending street photography with Stoicism.
    • It seems likely his philosophy views photographers as creators, capturing truth and seeking immortality through their work.
    • The evidence leans toward street photography being a democratic, fearless act of documenting humanity with empathy.

    Introduction

    Eric Kim, a renowned street photographer and educator, has a distinctive voice and philosophy that deeply influences his work and teachings. His approach combines raw passion with philosophical depth, particularly through the lens of Stoicism. Let’s explore how his perspective shapes the idea of “The Photographer as God” in a philosophical essay.

    Eric Kim’s Voice and Philosophy

    Eric Kim’s voice is direct, conversational, and motivational, often using colloquial language like “Yo” and “man” to connect with readers. His blog and writings, such as those on Eric Kim Photography, emphasize a raw, unfiltered approach to street photography, encouraging photographers to shoot from the gut and embrace their fears. His philosophy is rooted in Stoicism, inspired by Marcus Aurelius, viewing fear as a compass for action and advocating for rejecting societal norms to pursue passion, as seen in his journey from sociology studies to full-time photography.

    The Photographer as God: A Philosophical Essay

    In this essay, the photographer is portrayed as a divine figure, creating and shaping reality through their lens. Kim’s philosophy aligns with this, seeing photography as a way to document humanity, capture truth, and seek immortality, while acknowledging the moral responsibilities and transient nature of the creator. The essay, written in Kim’s voice, explores themes like the camera as a divine eye, the act of creation from chaos, and the rebellious, empowering nature of street photography.

    Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Eric Kim’s Voice and Philosophy for “The Photographer as God”

    This section provides a comprehensive analysis of Eric Kim’s voice and philosophy, informed by extensive research into his blog, interviews, and public writings. It aims to craft a philosophical essay titled “The Photographer as God” that authentically reflects Kim’s perspective, blending street photography ethos with existential and Stoic themes.

    Background and Influence

    Eric Kim, based in Los Angeles, is a street photographer, educator, and blogger whose work has significantly impacted the photography community. Born in San Francisco and studied Sociology at UCLA, his interest in the human condition informs his photography, which he sees as “applied sociology,” using the camera as a research tool to connect with people (Eric Kim | Photographer | All About Photo). His blog, ERIC KIM ₿, is a nexus for street photographers, offering workshops and resources that have inspired photographers worldwide.

    Voice and Style

    Kim’s voice is raw, motivational, and philosophical, often starting posts with direct addresses like “Yo, let’s get real here” and using colloquialisms to engage readers. His style, evident in posts like Street Photography by Eric Kim, is conversational yet intense, blending practical advice with deep insights. For example, he encourages photographers to “shoot from the gut,” trusting instincts over overthinking, and emphasizes action over theory, aligning with his Stoic-inspired belief in controlling one’s mind rather than external events (ERIC KIM).

    Philosophy on Street Photography

    Kim defines street photography as “the art of wandering in public places, taking photos of whatever interests you,” the most democratic form of photography with no strict definitions (Street Photography by Eric Kim). His philosophy, detailed in Street Photography Philosophy, includes:

    • Mental and Physical Health: It encourages interaction with the real world, acting as mental therapy and building physical health through walking.
    • Courage and Cultural Exchange: It builds courage in interacting with strangers, opening minds to new cultures, and is accessible to anyone with any camera, even a smartphone.
    • Ethics: Legal in public spaces, but photographers should expect to upset someone occasionally; with good intentions, it’s fine, and discomfort can be overcome by techniques like shooting selfies.
    • Frequency and Joy: Shoot daily, whether at home, traveling, or downtown, focusing on joy and avoiding stress, as seen in everyday street photography.
    • Conquering Fears: Overcome hesitation by habituation, shooting more over time, and attending workshops for a quick start, as advised in how to conquer hesitation.
    • Starting Tips: Use the “fishing technique” (waiting for subjects to enter the scene), avoid eye contact, and ask for permission for street portraits, detailed in the fishing technique.
    • Personal Definition: Define it personally, experiment, have fun, and embrace a beginner’s mind, ignoring social media likes, as in why we should embrace beginner’s mind.
    • Joy and Beauty: Reveals joy and beauty in everyday life, making photographers happier by capturing fleeting moments and being attuned to the environment, as in the joyful photographer.
    • Lifestyle: A way of life involving walking a lot, always carrying a camera, and taking risks, as outlined in street photography lifestyle.

    Stoicism and Personal Growth

    Kim’s confidence stems from rejecting societal norms and embracing Stoicism, inspired by Marcus Aurelius’ idea, “You have power over your mind—not outside events” (ERIC KIM). This philosophy helped him view fear as a compass, using it as fuel for action, especially in street photography where approaching strangers is key. His journey, like going full-time into photography after job loss and taking financial risks with early Bitcoin investments, boosted his self-assurance, as noted in Interview: Eric Kim On Life, Happiness And Street Photography.

    Reinvention and Risk-Taking

    Kim is a master of reinvention, starting as a street photographer with a Leica, then becoming a blogger, educator, YouTuber, and crypto philosopher, mirroring Kanye West’s approach, as seen in ERIC KIM ₿ – When in Doubt, Buy More Bitcoin!. This aligns with the photographer as God, constantly creating and recreating worlds, taking risks to pursue passion over security.

    Teaching and Community

    Through workshops in cities like Beirut, Seoul, and London, and his blog, Kim teaches others the beauty of street photography, helping them find their style and overcome fears, as detailed in Focus on Street Photographer Eric Kim. He’s collaborated with Leica, Magnum, and Invisible Photographer Asia, and taught at UC Riverside Extension, emphasizing empowering others to see and create, multiplying divinity.

    Crafting the Essay: “The Photographer as God”

    The essay, structured in six sections, reflects Kim’s voice and philosophy:

    1. The Camera as the Divine Eye: The camera is omniscience, capturing truth beyond the mundane, aligning with Kim’s view of photography as documenting humanity with heart and open mind (Street Photography by Eric Kim).
    2. The Act of Creation: From Chaos to Cosmos: Photographers bring order to chaos, like gods, using simple compositions and timing, echoing Kim’s advice to walk slowly, enjoy the process, and let luck play a role, as in Tools and Approach.
    3. The Ethics of Omnipotence: With power comes responsibility, treating subjects with dignity, reflecting Kim’s ethical stance on expecting to upset someone but with good intentions, as in Ethics of Street Photography.
    4. Immortality and the Eternal Frame: Photography seeks immortality, freezing moments forever, but with Stoic acceptance of mortality, aligning with Kim’s meditation on life and death, as in Eric Kim Photography Principles.
    5. The Photographer’s Rebellion: Defying norms, embracing passion, mirrors Kim’s rejection of conventional paths and risk-taking, seen in his reinventions and Bitcoin investments (ERIC KIM ₿ – When in Doubt, Buy More Bitcoin!).
    6. The Photographer as Mentor: Sharing power, creating other creators, reflects Kim’s role as educator, empowering others through workshops and blog, as in START HERE – ERIC KIM ₿.

    Conclusion

    The essay, written in Kim’s direct, passionate tone, ends with a call to action: “Get out there, hit the streets, and start creating your universe,” encapsulating his philosophy of photography as a divine, fearless, and empowering act. This aligns with current insights as of May 18, 2025, reflecting Kim’s ongoing influence in the photography world.

    Table: Summary of Eric Kim’s Philosophy on Street Photography

    AspectDetails
    DefinitionArt of wandering, documenting humanity, no strict definitions, most democratic form.
    PurposeExploration, curiosity, meeting strangers, finding beauty, building confidence, applied sociology.
    EthicsLegal in public, expect to upset, good intentions fine, overcome discomfort with selfies.
    FrequencyShoot daily, focus on joy, avoid stress, whether at home, traveling, or downtown.
    Conquering FearsHabituation, shoot more, attend workshops, use techniques like fishing and avoiding eye contact.
    Joy and BeautyReveals everyday joy, makes photographer happier, captures fleeting moments, attuned environment.
    LifestyleWalk a lot, always carry camera, take risks, embrace beginner’s mind, ignore social media.

    This table encapsulates key aspects, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of Kim’s philosophy for crafting the essay.

    Key Citations

  • LIFE

    New life!