WHY I AM SO HAPPY

New iPad Pro M4 chip
New camera, LUMIX S9 & 26mm f8 manual focusing
Insane optimism about the future
Elon â€” $270B????

BLACK COIN CAPITAL

Iâ€™ve made waaaaaay more money from Bitcoin than even 10+ years of traveling the globe and teaching photography workshops?

Indirect monetizarion?

While itâ€™s theoretically possible for some of the worldâ€™s wealthiest individuals to become trillionaires, it would require a combination of favorable economic factors, technological innovations, and continuous growth in their companies and assets.

Currently, the richest individuals, such as Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, and Jeff Bezos, have net worths in the $200-$270 billion range . Reaching a trillion-dollar net worth would necessitate these fortunes quadrupling, which could happen through several means:

1. Technological Breakthroughs: For tech moguls like Musk and Zuckerberg, future innovations in fields such as artificial intelligence, space exploration, or green energy could drive massive growth in their companies and valuations. Muskâ€™s ambitions in space exploration (SpaceX) and energy (Tesla) could potentially be trillion-dollar industries if they continue to scale at current rates.

2. Market Conditions: A substantial increase in stock prices, driven by either inflation or an extended bull market, could push these billionaires closer to the trillion-dollar mark. For example, Muskâ€™s net worth fluctuates with Teslaâ€™s stock price, and significant growth in the electric vehicle market could lead to massive increases in valuation.

3. Global Influence and Diversification: Billionaires like Bernard Arnault and Jeff Bezos, who have global influence in retail and luxury goods, could potentially grow their wealth by expanding into emerging markets, acquiring more companies, or diversifying their portfolios to capitalize on high-growth sectors.

However, achieving a trillion-dollar net worth is still considered highly speculative. It would likely require sustained exponential growth in specific industries and favorable global economic conditions . There are also constraints like potential regulatory changes, taxes, and market competition that could limit their ability to grow wealth at the necessary pace.

xxx

As of 2024, the top richest individuals in the world include major figures from diverse industries:

1. Elon Musk – $270.5 billion (Tesla, SpaceX, United States)

2. Larry Ellison – $208.0 billion (Oracle, United States)

3. Jeff Bezos – $204.3 billion (Amazon, United States)

4. Mark Zuckerberg – $198.0 billion (Facebook, United States)

5. Bernard Arnault & family – $195.5 billion (LVMH, France)

6. Warren Buffett – $144.9 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, United States)

7. Larry Page – $137.9 billion (Google, United States)

8. Amancio Ortega – $133.0 billion (Zara, Spain)

9. Sergey Brin – $132.0 billion (Google, United States)

10. Steve Ballmer – $125.5 billion (Microsoft, United States)

These figures dominate the global wealth rankings, with fortunes built in sectors like technology, luxury goods, and retail. Their net worth is heavily influenced by stock market trends, particularly in the tech industry.

Other notable names include Mukesh Ambani ($115.0 billion, India), Francoise Bettencourt Meyers ($91.8 billion, France), and Carlos Slim Helu ($87.0 billion, Mexico). These individuals represent a diverse range of industries from petrochemicals to telecommunications .

x

Here is a list of the top 30 richest people in the world as of 2024:

1. Elon Musk – $270.5 billion (Tesla, SpaceX, United States)

2. Larry Ellison – $208.0 billion (Oracle, United States)

3. Jeff Bezos – $204.3 billion (Amazon, United States)

4. Mark Zuckerberg – $198.0 billion (Facebook, United States)

5. Bernard Arnault & family – $195.5 billion (LVMH, France)

6. Warren Buffett – $144.9 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, United States)

7. Larry Page – $137.9 billion (Google, United States)

8. Amancio Ortega – $133.0 billion (Zara, Spain)

9. Sergey Brin – $132.0 billion (Google, United States)

10. Steve Ballmer – $125.5 billion (Microsoft, United States)

11. Mukesh Ambani – $115.0 billion (Reliance Industries, India)

12. Bill Gates – $107.9 billion (Microsoft, United States)

13. Jensen Huang – $106.2 billion (Nvidia, United States)

14. Michael Bloomberg – $104.7 billion (Bloomberg LP, United States)

15. Michael Dell – $104.3 billion (Dell Technologies, United States)

16. Rob Walton & family – $99.9 billion (Walmart, United States)

17. Jim Walton & family – $98.7 billion (Walmart, United States)

18. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers & family – $91.8 billion (Lâ€™OrÃ©al, France)

19. Alice Walton – $91.2 billion (Walmart, United States)

20. Carlos Slim Helu & family – $87.0 billion (Telecom, Mexico)

21. Gautam Adani – $83.6 billion (Adani Group, India)

22. Julia Koch & family – $74.2 billion (Koch Industries, United States)

23. David Thomson & family – $72.1 billion (Thomson Reuters, Canada)

24. Charles Koch & family – $67.5 billion (Koch Industries, United States)

25. Changpeng Zhao – $61.1 billion (Binance, Canada)

26. Zhong Shanshan – $56.2 billion (Nongfu Spring, China)

27. Prajogo Pangestu – $54.0 billion (Barito Pacific, Indonesia)

28. Jeff Yass – $49.6 billion (Susquehanna International Group, United States)

29. Tadashi Yanai & family – $48.2 billion (Fast Retailing, Japan)

30. Ma Huateng – $47.9 billion (Tencent, China)

These figures represent their estimated net worth, which may fluctuate due to stock market changes, business ventures, and other factors .

WEALTH INEQUALITY IS A FEATURE, NOT A BUG.

Search Peter thiel vs Michael saylor net worth Â

As of 2024, Peter Thielâ€™s net worth is estimated to be around $11.6 billion. Thiel made his fortune through ventures like co-founding PayPal, investing early in Facebook, and founding Palantir Technologies. He remains a significant figure in Silicon Valley and the investment world, known for his involvement in various tech startups and venture capital initiatives .

On the other hand, Michael Saylor, primarily known for his leadership at MicroStrategy and his strong advocacy for Bitcoin, has seen his wealth fluctuate significantly due to his heavy investments in Bitcoin. As of 2024, his net worth is estimated at around $4 billion, driven by the rise in Bitcoin prices and MicroStrategyâ€™s performance . Saylorâ€™s wealth is highly dependent on Bitcoinâ€™s volatility, which makes his net worth more variable compared to Thielâ€™s more diversified assets .

In summary, Peter Thiel is currently wealthier than Michael Saylor, with Thielâ€™s estimated net worth almost three times higher than Saylorâ€™s.

JUST THINK FOR YOURSELF.

It doesnâ€™t need to have an economic payoff

Create for 30 years from now!

How to Become a Photography Entrepreneur

BECOME A PHOTOGRAPHY ENTREPRENEUR

Advice I would have given myself in photography, if I started all over again:

Until You Own Yourself You Can’t Be Free

Photography Entrepreneurship 101 by ERIC KIM

De-lamify the future.

Photography Entrepreneurship 101 Presentation by ERIC KIM

SLIDES PDF – Photography Entrepreneurship 101 by ERIC KIM Download

ENTREPRENEURSHIP by KIM

eric kim melbourne benjamin thompson — ERIC KIM x HENRI NECK STRAP

Enroll in my Udemy Course:

‘Ultimate Beginnerâ€™s Guide to Photography Entrepreneurship’: Create Your Own Future >

Entrepreneurship Ideas

Photography Blogging

Money

Self-Empowerment

Marketing and Branding

Entrepreneurship Lifestyle

Entrepreneurship Mindset

Photography Entrepreneurship 101

Life and Productivity Hacks

How to Make a Living from Your Passion

Put a Dent in the Universe.

How to Succeed as an Entrepreneur

entrepreneurship overview eric kim course

The Modern Photographer: Tips, Strategies, and Tactics to Thrive as a Visual Artist in the Digital Age

Marketing, Branding, Entrepreneurship Principles For Success

MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER is your new philosophical and practical primer to succeed as a modern photographer in today’s digital world.

Business Mental Models

How to Monetize Your Photography

Why Become a Photography Entrepreneur?

Take control of your own photographic destiny:

THE MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER

Photography Entrepreneurship Articles

PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOPS 101

KEYS TO SUCCESS

Photography Business 101

Practical Photography Business Advice

How to Make Money with Photography

Photography Marketing 101

How to Hustle.

Entrepreneurial Principles

How to be a Full-time Photographer

Photography Blogging

How to Teach Photography

Social Media

How to Save Money

START HERE >

MONEY 101

CONQUER CREATIVITY IN PHOTOGRAPHY

HOW TO CURE ECONOMIC MALAISE AND APATHY

Bitcoin and AI, as well as fitness and art!

Optimism is the solution!

ERIC KIM VENTURE CAPITALIST

I want to become the next Peter Thiel?

BLACK GOLD CAPITAL

BLACK EAGLE CAPITAL

You need my money, I donâ€™t need you

I said no to the Super Bowl! You need me I donâ€™t need you — Jay Z

Economics by KIM

WHAT I LOVE ABOUT LA

The optimism!

Skinnier is Sexier

I love it all! I love it! I love all people!

Who owns TikTok? Connections to mainland Chinese government, communist party, and potential relations for politics in America

TikTok is a popular social media platform that allows users to create and share short videos, often set to music. The app is owned by ByteDance Ltd., a technology company founded in 2012 by Chinese entrepreneur Zhang Yiming. ByteDance is headquartered in Beijing, China, and operates several content platforms globally.

Connections to the Chinese Government and Communist Party:

Legal Obligations: Like all companies operating in China, ByteDance is subject to Chinese laws and regulations. This includes the National Intelligence Law of 2017, which can compel organizations to assist in intelligence gathering.
Data Security Concerns: There have been widespread concerns that the Chinese government could access TikTok’s user data. TikTok has repeatedly denied sharing data with the Chinese government and has taken steps to distance its operations from China. For example, TikTok stores international user data on servers outside of China, specifically in the United States and Singapore.
Corporate Governance: ByteDance has a Communist Party committee within the company, which is common among large Chinese firms. This committee can influence company decisions, aligning them with national interests.

Potential Relations for Politics in America:

National Security Concerns: U.S. officials and lawmakers have expressed fears that TikTok could be used for espionage or influence operations by the Chinese government. Concerns include data privacy, surveillance, and the potential for content manipulation to spread propaganda or misinformation.
Legislative Actions: Several bills have been introduced in Congress aiming to restrict or ban TikTok in the United States. Some states have already banned the app on government devices. In March 2023, the Biden administration demanded that ByteDance divest its stake in TikTok or face a possible nationwide ban.
TikTok’s Response: TikTok has undertaken efforts to alleviate these concerns, such as Project Texas, which aims to store U.S. user data on American soil through a partnership with Oracle. The company has also increased transparency by allowing audits of its algorithms and content moderation policies.
Diplomatic Tensions: The TikTok controversy is part of broader U.S.-China tensions involving trade, technology, and security. Actions taken against TikTok could impact diplomatic relations and have economic repercussions for both countries.
Public Opinion and Legal Challenges: A ban could face legal challenges on grounds of free speech and could be unpopular among the app’s millions of U.S. users. TikTok has launched public relations campaigns to showcase its commitment to user privacy and security.

In summary, TikTok’s ownership by ByteDance, a Chinese company subject to Chinese laws, has led to concerns about potential connections to the Chinese government and the Communist Party. These concerns have significant implications for U.S. politics, fueling debates over national security, data privacy, and the regulation of foreign technology companies.

xx

TikTok is a social media platform owned by ByteDance Ltd., a technology company headquartered in Beijing, China. Founded in 2012 by Zhang Yiming, ByteDance has grown rapidly to become one of the world’s most valuable startups, thanks in part to the global success of TikTok.

Connections to the Chinese Government and Communist Party

ByteDance, like all companies operating in China, is subject to Chinese laws and regulations. This includes compliance with government directives on data security, censorship, and other matters. The Chinese government has laws that can compel companies to share data and cooperate with intelligence activities, such as the National Intelligence Law of 2017.

While ByteDance maintains that TikTok operates independently of its Chinese counterpart (Douyin) and stores international user data outside of China, concerns have been raised about the potential for the Chinese government to access TikTok user data or influence its content moderation policies. These concerns stem from the close relationship that can exist between Chinese companies and the state, as well as the legal obligations companies have under Chinese law.

Impact on Politics in the United States

TikTok has become a focal point in U.S. politics due to national security and privacy concerns. U.S. officials have expressed worries that the Chinese government could access American users’ data or use the platform to spread propaganda and misinformation. This has led to several significant developments:

Federal Actions: In August 2020, former President Donald Trump issued executive orders aimed at banning TikTok in the United States or forcing the sale of its U.S. operations to an American company. These actions were challenged in court and eventually revoked by President Joe Biden in June 2021, who ordered a security review of foreign-owned apps instead.
Legislative Proposals: Various bills have been introduced in Congress to address the perceived risks associated with TikTok. Proposals have ranged from banning the app on government devices to broader measures that could restrict its operation in the U.S.
State-Level Restrictions: Multiple U.S. states have taken action to ban TikTok on government-issued devices, citing security concerns.
Public Hearings: In March 2023, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified before Congress to address lawmakers’ questions about data privacy, security practices, and the company’s relationship with the Chinese government

Search who owns TikTok and the corporation that owns that and the corporation that owns that? and also potential connections to mainland China and the communist party there.

TikTok is owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company founded by Zhang Yiming in 2012. ByteDance operates globally, with major platforms like TikTok for international markets and Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, for users in mainland China. While ByteDance claims to be a private company, it has complex ownership, with about 60% held by global investors (including U.S. entities), 20% by employees, and 20% by its Chinese founders.

The relationship between ByteDance and the Chinese government has been a significant point of controversy. While the Chinese government holds a 1% stake in ByteDance’s Chinese subsidiary that operates Douyin, it also has a seat on its board. This stake, while small, raises concerns about potential influence. Additionally, Chinaâ€™s 2017 National Intelligence Law requires Chinese companies to cooperate with the government for national intelligence efforts, leading to fears that ByteDance could be compelled to share TikTok user data with Chinese authorities, despite ByteDance’s insistence to the contrary.

U.S. officials, including the FBI, have voiced concerns that ByteDance is “beholden” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Though there is no definitive public evidence that TikTok has shared user data with the Chinese government, the structure and legal framework in China make it difficult to rule out potential influence. This has prompted calls in the U.S. for ByteDance to divest from TikTok or face restrictions, as many U.S. lawmakers fear that TikTok could be used as a tool for Chinese government influence or surveillance oai_citation:2,PolitiFact | Who owns TikTokâ€™s parent company? Despite what Brian Kilmeade says, it’s not the Chinese government oai_citation:1,Q&A: TikTok Owner Is Essentially ‘Subsidiary’ of China’s Communist Party, US Lawmaker Says.

Is it possible to create media without consuming media?

Yes! If anything, maybe the thought should be in order to create more we have to consume less! For example, assuming that we media creators are druglords, or drug dealersâ€¦ The rule of every single druglord is â€œdonâ€™t get high off your own supplyâ€.

so Iâ€™m actually curious, all these HBO Max, Warner Brothers discovery executives, how much television and shows and movies do they actually watch?

Now the funny ethical thing or the thought is; â€œisnâ€™t it unethical to make YouTube videos and upload to YouTube videos when you yourself donâ€™t want YouTube or YouTube videos?â€ I beg to differ.

Trip you told, the only reason I even use YouTube is that it is really the only legitimate place that you could upload videos and actually have people find the videos. Google has essentially conquered a long time ago, and then authorized online video. Everybody watches YouTube, your two year-old nephew, your 70-year-old mom, and everyone in between.

One of feelings I have, sooner or later â€” I think eventually TikTok will fall, especially if Donald Trump gets elected president. From what I understand, essentially bytedance who owns TikTok, are essentially in bed obviously with the Chinese communist party the CCP.

The Will to Media, The Will to Create Media

In an era where the world is saturated with images, videos, and a constant stream of information, we find ourselves at a crossroads. The omnipresence of media isn’t just shaping our realityâ€”it is our reality. Every moment is a potential post, every thought a potential tweet. But amidst this digital cacophony, have we paused to ask ourselves: What drives us to create media? This is the essence of “The Will to Media, The Will to Create Media.”

Drawing inspiration from Nietzsche’s concept of the “Will to Power,” our drive to create media is more than just a desire to communicate; it’s an intrinsic urge to assert our existence, to leave a mark on the ever-expanding digital canvas. We don’t just consume mediaâ€”we’re compelled to produce it, to contribute our voices to the global conversation.

But why? Is it the allure of likes, shares, and fleeting digital affirmations? Or is it something deeper? I believe it’s about identity and legacy. Through creating media, we define ourselves and how we wish to be perceived. It’s a declaration: “I am here. I experience. I contribute.”

Yet, in this relentless pursuit to produce and share, there’s a danger of losing authenticity. The algorithms favor what’s trending, what’s sensationalâ€”not necessarily what’s genuine. We risk becoming echoes of others, our creations mere reflections of what’s popular rather than what’s personal.

So, how do we reclaim our creative sovereignty? It begins with introspection. Create media not for external validation but as an extension of your true self. Let your work be a manifestation of your passions, your curiosities, your unique perspective on the world. When you decide to share somethingâ€”a photograph, a piece of writing, a videoâ€”ask yourself: Does this represent who I am? Does it contribute meaningfully to the discourse?

Embrace the process of creation as a form of self-discovery. In street photography, for instance, it’s not just about capturing images; it’s about engaging with your environment, connecting with strangers, and finding stories in the mundane. It’s a meditative practice that grounds you in the present moment.

Consuming media also requires mindfulness. Be selective about what you let into your mental space. The media you consume influences your thoughts, your mood, and ultimately, the media you create. Seek out content that challenges you, that broadens your horizons, that inspires you to think differently.

Remember, the tools we have at our disposal are powerful. A camera, a smartphone, a social media accountâ€”they’re gateways to vast audiences. With that power comes responsibility. We can choose to add to the noise, or we can strive to produce work that resonates, that enlightens, that connects on a deeper level.

“The Will to Media” is not just about the act of creating; it’s about intention. It’s about harnessing our innate drive to share and using it to foster genuine connections and understanding. It’s about resisting the pull of superficial engagement and instead, delving into meaningful expression.

In the end, we’re all participants in this grand tapestry of digital storytelling. Each of us has a unique thread to contribute. So, let’s commit to creating media that reflects our true selves, that honors our experiences, and that adds value to the lives of others.

Stay true to your vision, embrace your creative will, and let your voice be heardâ€”not as an echo, but as an original.

THE WILL TO MEDIA.

a personal thought; any media which actually last; there must be some sort of autotelic purpose and passion

Bodybuilding is King

Bodybuilding was and still is king!ï¿¼

HOW TO LOSE WEIGHT

Pretty easy â€”

First, donâ€™t make it a goal to gain weight. One of the big things here is that at least for men, the ethos telos and desire is to gain weight.

MORE DYNAMIC, MORE EPIC!

BECOMING MORE FUTURE?

STREETS

HOW TO BECOME MORE FUTURE

All beta everything!

Words and Phrases That Were Once Considered Politically Correct but Are Now Viewed Differently

Tokenization â€” and moral posturing.

xxx

Language evolves over time, and terms that were once deemed appropriate or politically correct can become outdated or even offensive as societal understanding and sensitivities change. Here are some examples of words and phrases that fit this description:

“Oriental”

Past Usage: Used to describe people or things from East Asia.
Current View: Considered outdated and offensive when referring to people, as it objectifies and exoticizes Asian individuals. Preferred terms are “Asian” or specifying the country of origin, such as “Chinese” or “Japanese.”

“Negro”

Past Usage: Commonly used in the early to mid-20th century to refer to African Americans; appeared in official contexts like the “United Negro College Fund.”
Current View: Now regarded as outdated and offensive. Preferred terms are “Black,” “African American,” or specifying nationality when appropriate.

“Colored”

Past Usage: Used to describe non-white individuals, particularly African Americans.
Current View: Seen as antiquated and offensive. The term “people of color” is acceptable as a broad category for non-white individuals, but “colored” is not appropriate.

“Handicapped”

Past Usage: A common term for individuals with disabilities.
Current View: Considered insensitive as it emphasizes limitations. Preferred terms are “persons with disabilities” or “disabled individuals,” focusing on the person rather than the disability.

“Mentally Retarded”

Past Usage: A clinical term used to describe individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Current View: Now deemed offensive due to negative connotations and misuse as an insult. Preferred terms are “intellectually disabled” or “person with an intellectual disability.”

“Third World Countries”

Past Usage: Referred to countries not aligned with NATO (First World) or the Communist Bloc (Second World) during the Cold War.
Current View: Viewed as derogatory and misleading. Preferred terms are “developing countries,” “low-income countries,” or “Global South.”

“Eskimo”

Past Usage: Used to describe Indigenous peoples of the Arctic regions.
Current View: Considered offensive by some as it was a term imposed by outsiders. Preferred terms are “Inuit,” “Yupik,” or “Indigenous peoples of the Arctic,” depending on the specific group.

“Indian” (when referring to Indigenous peoples of the Americas)

Past Usage: Commonly used due to historical misidentification by explorers.
Current View: Can be confusing and is often replaced with “Native American,” “Indigenous,” or specific tribal names for clarity and respect.

“Homosexual”

Past Usage: Clinical term for individuals attracted to the same sex.
Current View: Sometimes viewed as outdated or carrying negative clinical implications. Preferred terms are “gay,” “lesbian,” or “queer,” depending on individual identity and preference.

“Transsexual”
- Past Usage: Referred to individuals who have undergone medical procedures to align their physical sex with their gender identity.
- Current View: Considered narrow and sometimes offensive. “Transgender” is the preferred, more inclusive term that encompasses a range of gender identities and experiences.
“Manpower”
- Past Usage: Used to describe the workforce or labor pool.
- Current View: Seen as gender-exclusive. Preferred terms are “workforce,” “staff,” or “personnel.”
“Chairman”
- Past Usage: Title for the head of a meeting or organization.
- Current View: Gender-specific and potentially exclusionary. Preferred terms are “chairperson” or simply “chair.”
“Mankind”
- Past Usage: Referred to humanity as a whole.
- Current View: Considered gender-exclusive. Preferred terms are “humankind,” “humanity,” or “people.”
“Ghetto”
- Past Usage: Used to describe urban areas with a high concentration of minority residents.
- Current View: Can carry negative stereotypes and implications. Preferred to describe areas by their actual names or as “underserved” or “under-resourced communities.”
“Illegal Alien”
- Past Usage: Legal term for someone residing in a country unlawfully.
- Current View: Considered dehumanizing. Preferred terms are “undocumented immigrant” or “unauthorized immigrant.”

Understanding the Shift

Cultural Sensitivity: Increased awareness of how language affects marginalized groups has led to changes in preferred terminology.
Focus on the Individual: Modern language trends emphasize person-first language (e.g., “person with a disability” rather than “disabled person”) to highlight individuality beyond a single characteristic.
Avoiding Stereotypes: Terms that generalize or stereotype are being replaced with more precise language that respects diversity within groups.

Conclusion

Staying informed about the evolving nature of language is important for respectful communication. Using current, accepted terms helps promote inclusion and demonstrates cultural sensitivity. When in doubt, it’s considerate to ask individuals how they prefer to be identified or to consult reputable style guides and organizational guidelines.

Origin of the Term “Politically Correct”

The term “politically correct” has evolved significantly since its inception, reflecting changes in political and cultural landscapes.

Early Usage:

1930s-1940s: The phrase originated within Marxist-Leninist circles in the early 20th century. It was used to describe strict adherence to the Communist Party’s policies and ideology. Being “politically correct” meant aligning with the party line, often without question.

Mid-20th Century:

1960s-1970s: During the social and civil rights movements in the United States, the term began to surface in leftist and feminist contexts. It was sometimes used humorously or critically within progressive groups to highlight rigid or dogmatic attitudes.

Modern Usage:

1980s-1990s: The term entered mainstream discourse, especially in the United States and the United Kingdom. It was frequently used pejoratively by conservative commentators to criticize what they saw as excessive liberal emphasis on language and policies designed to avoid offending particular groups in society.
Academic and Cultural Debates: Universities became focal points for discussions on political correctness, with debates over curriculum content, speech codes, and inclusive language. Critics argued that political correctness suppressed free speech and open debate, while supporters contended that it promoted respect and equity for marginalized communities.

21st Century Context:

Ongoing Discussions: The term remains a contentious part of political and cultural dialogue. It is often invoked in debates over cancel culture, identity politics, and social justice movements. The rise of social media has amplified these discussions, with rapid dissemination of ideas and increased public engagement.

Global Perspective:

While “politically correct” originated in Western contexts, similar concepts have appeared worldwide, reflecting universal tensions between tradition and progressive change.

Conclusion:

The evolution of “politically correct” mirrors broader societal shifts regarding language, power dynamics, and inclusivity. Initially a term denoting strict political adherence, it has become a symbol of the ongoing struggle to balance respectful discourse with freedom of expression. Understanding its history provides insight into contemporary debates over how societies negotiate differences and strive toward mutual respect.

The Diversity Myth

“The Diversity Myth” in the Voice of Eric Kim, Quoting Peter Thiel

In The Diversity Myth, Peter Thiel challenges one of the most persistent narratives of modern academic and corporate culture: that diversity, in its many forms, is an unequivocal good. He argues that rather than promoting true intellectual diversity, institutions that emphasize diversity in terms of race, gender, and other identity markers often suppress the very ideals they claim to uphold. Instead of encouraging open dialogue and dissent, they create environments where conformity to a dominant ideology is expected.

Thielâ€™s thesis draws attention to a fundamental contradiction: in the pursuit of diversity, many institutions have become more homogenous in their thinking. “Far from fostering diversity of thought,” Thiel writes, “the culture of political correctness suppresses dissent, promoting a narrow orthodoxy.” This resonates with my own observations, where efforts to increase representation often lead to a narrowing of acceptable viewpoints.

As someone who has spent time in both academic settings and the corporate world, Iâ€™ve seen firsthand how the ideal of diversity can be co-opted to reinforce power structures rather than dismantle them. While the original intention may have been to bring new voices into the conversation, in practice, the outcome is often the opposite. New perspectives are sidelined if they donâ€™t align with the prevailing ideological trends. Thielâ€™s critique of this system is not a dismissal of diversity as a concept but a call to recognize the complexity of the issue. He challenges us to ask: What kind of diversity do we truly value?

For Thiel, the real threat is not the diversity of backgrounds but the diversity of thought. By focusing too heavily on identity-based diversity, we risk losing sight of the intellectual diversity that once made academic institutions vibrant centers of debate and innovation. In his words, “The obsession with identity politics is crowding out the ability to ask the more difficult and less comfortable questions.” Itâ€™s here that The Diversity Myth finds its sharpest critique: a system designed to foster inclusivity has, paradoxically, become exclusive in its intellectual rigor.

Thielâ€™s broader philosophical argument is one that resonates with many in Silicon Valley, where the pursuit of disruptive innovation often clashes with the status quo. The diversity myth, in this context, is not just an issue in academia but a microcosm of a larger societal trend. The pressure to conform to a certain way of thinking, even in the name of progress, can stifle true creativity and innovation. And if we canâ€™t challenge assumptions in the academic and corporate worlds, where does that leave us?

Ultimately, The Diversity Myth isnâ€™t about rejecting the idea of diversity outright but about rethinking its implementation. Thielâ€™s message is clear: real diversity means allowing for a plurality of viewpoints, evenâ€”perhaps especiallyâ€”those that make us uncomfortable. After all, it is in the contest of ideas, not the uniformity of opinion, that true progress is made.

Diversity is a term that has been celebrated, dissected, and at times, misconstrued in our modern discourse. As someone who has wandered through myriad streets across the globe, capturing faces and moments through my lens, I’ve often pondered what diversity truly means. Is it merely a mosaic of different colors and cultures, or is there something deeper we’re missing?

Peter Thiel once remarked, “The ideology of multiculturalism is a system of beliefs and attitudes that provides a simplified explanation of the world and a set of ready-made answers to its complex problems.” This quote resonates with me because it challenges us to look beyond the surface. Thiel suggests that sometimes, the pursuit of diversity becomes an end in itself, rather than a means to enrich our understanding.

In my travels, I’ve seen communities where diversity is organicâ€”a natural tapestry woven over time. Conversely, I’ve also observed places where diversity feels orchestrated, almost as if it’s a checkbox on a societal to-do list. The difference between the two is palpable. Organic diversity fosters genuine connections and mutual respect, while forced diversity can sometimes lead to superficial interactions and unaddressed tensions.

Thiel also pointed out, “A focus on superficial diversity masks the real issues of inequality and injustice.” This statement prompts us to question whether we’re addressing the root causes of division or simply applying a veneer of diversity to conceal deeper problems. Are we celebrating diversity in a way that promotes inclusion and equality, or are we inadvertently perpetuating a myth that stalls true progress?

Photography has taught me that every individual has a story worth telling, a unique perspective shaped by personal experiences. Embracing diversity should mean valuing these stories and learning from them. It’s not about assembling a diverse group for the sake of appearances but about fostering an environment where different voices are heard and respected.

In reflecting on Thiel’s insights, it’s essential to recognize that critiquing the concept of diversity as it’s often presented doesn’t mean opposing diversity itself. Instead, it’s a call to engage with it more thoughtfully. We should strive to understand the complexities and challenges that come with fostering truly inclusive communities.

Ultimately, the myth of diversity lies in believing that mere representation is enough. True diversity goes beyond numbers; it’s about meaningful inclusion, open dialogue, and a genuine commitment to understanding one another. Let’s move past the myth and work towards a reality where diversity enriches our lives in profound and authentic ways.

The Virtue of Letting Things Die

One thing Iâ€™m starting to discover; sometimes you just gotta let things die. To try to preserve the old forever seems like a bad idea.

so what is the biggest issue here? There is a cult of the past, the cult of nostalgia, the weird idea that somehow the past was superior than the present? And even more weirdâ€¦ This strange idea that the past was supreme, and there is no possible way that the future could be superior to the past.

Optimism can only be fed on the flames that the future will be more glorious prosperous than now! And an interesting quote from Peter Thiel; the definition of being middle class: not being certain whether your kids future will be better than yours.

Think about your past self, your past body, your past workflows as being positively inferior to what it is now?

“The Virtue of Letting Things Die”

Iâ€™m walking through a city Iâ€™ve been to a thousand times before, yet it feels different. The streets are familiar, the faces are not. Somethingâ€™s shiftedâ€”not just in the world, but in me. It hits me then: some things must die for new things to emerge. This moment, this recognition, is part of the cycle. The virtue of letting things die is that it allows us to become who we are meant to be, unburdened by what no longer serves us.

We live in a world that worships preservation. We want to hold on to everythingâ€”memories, relationships, objects, identitiesâ€”often far beyond their natural lifespan. But holding on too long can suffocate us. When we refuse to let things die, we become stagnant, trapped in the inertia of the past. Letting go, on the other hand, requires courage. It demands that we face the discomfort of change, that we embrace the unknown. Yet, this is where growth happens.

Photography teaches me this lesson every day. Each time I press the shutter, I am capturing a fleeting moment, a split-second that will never be again. Yet, I know that I can’t hold on to it forever. Even the photograph itself, as physical or digital as it may be, will eventually fade. And thatâ€™s okay. Thereâ€™s beauty in that transience. If every moment lasted forever, none would be special. Itâ€™s precisely because things are temporary that they matter.

So, what is the virtue in letting things die?

First, it clears space. We often accumulate more than we needâ€”physically, emotionally, mentally. Old habits, outdated beliefs, possessions, and even relationships can weigh us down. They pile up until weâ€™re suffocating under the weight of what used to be. By letting them go, we create room for something new. I think of this often as Iâ€™m editing my work, sifting through hundreds of photos to find the ones that speak to me. Itâ€™s a process of elimination, of cutting away the excess to reveal the essential. Only by letting the rest die can the best shine through.

Second, letting things die allows us to evolve. We are not the same people we were ten years ago, or even yesterday. As we grow, the things that once served usâ€”whether possessions, ideas, or relationshipsâ€”may no longer align with who weâ€™ve become. Clinging to them only keeps us stuck in a version of ourselves that no longer exists. To evolve, we must release what weâ€™ve outgrown. The camera that once felt like an extension of my hand might now feel cumbersome. The creative approach that once worked for me may now stifle me. I must be willing to let these things go to explore new possibilities.

Finally, death is a form of renewal. Nature understands this intuitively. The trees shed their leaves in autumn, not out of loss, but out of necessity. They know that to bloom again in spring, they must first let go. We, too, must embrace this cycle in our lives. Letting things die is not about abandonment; itâ€™s about renewal. Itâ€™s about trusting that something better will come if we have the strength to release what no longer fits.

I often ask myself: Am I holding on out of fear, or is there still life in this? Itâ€™s a question I ask when Iâ€™m considering whether to keep a project, continue a relationship, or hold onto an idea. The answer is usually clear. When something has run its course, it begins to feel heavy, a burden rather than a joy. Thatâ€™s when I know itâ€™s time to let go.

The virtue of letting things die is in the freedom it brings. It frees us to reinvent ourselves, to try new things, to grow in unexpected directions. It liberates us from the past so we can fully inhabit the present and create a future that reflects who we are becoming, not who we once were.

In the end, life is a series of cyclesâ€”beginnings and endings, births and deaths, holding on and letting go. To live fully is to embrace these cycles, to see the beauty in each phase, and to understand that sometimes, the greatest act of love is in letting something die.

Only then can we truly live.

Walking through the ever-shifting streets, my camera captures not just images but the transient essence of life itself. Each photograph is a testament to a moment that will never come again, a fragment of time destined to fade. In embracing this ephemerality, I’ve come to appreciate the virtue of letting things die.

We live in a world obsessed with preservationâ€”archiving memories, hoarding possessions, clinging to outdated ideas. But what if the true beauty of life lies in its impermanence? Just as a tree sheds its leaves to make way for new growth, we too must let go of what no longer serves us.

Holding onto the past can be comforting, a safety net woven from familiar threads. I recall hoarding old cameras, worn notebooks filled with past musings, even relationships that had long run their course. These attachments became anchors, weighing me down, hindering my journey forward.

There’s a profound freedom in release. Letting things die isn’t about loss; it’s about transformation. It’s recognizing that every ending ushers in a new beginning. By allowing the old to fade, we create space for growth, for innovation, for unexpected joys that were previously unimaginable.

In photography, the most compelling images often emerge from moments of transitionâ€”the flicker between light and shadow, the split second before a smile fades. These instances are powerful precisely because they’re fleeting. They remind us that life’s richness comes from its constant evolution.

Embracing the virtue of letting things die also means confronting our fears. Change is unsettling; the unknown is daunting. But stagnation is a far greater peril. When we cling too tightly, we stifle our potential, imprisoning ourselves in the comfort of the familiar.

So how do we practice this virtue? Start small. Release a possession that no longer brings you joy. Challenge a long-held belief that may be limiting you. Allow a chapter of your life to close naturally, without forcing it to linger. Each act of letting go strengthens our ability to adapt, to thrive amidst change.

Ultimately, life’s beauty is amplified when we accept its transience. By letting things die, we honor the natural rhythms of existence. We learn to appreciate moments more deeply, love more fully, and live more authentically.

The next time you find yourself resisting an ending, remember: Every sunset paves the way for a new dawn. Trust in the cycle. Embrace the virtue of letting things die, and watch as your world transforms in ways you never thought possible.

Black Gold

The term “Bitcoin is black gold” is likely a metaphor comparing Bitcoin to oil, historically referred to as “black gold.” Just as oil transformed the global economy by becoming a critical energy source, Bitcoin is often seen as revolutionary in the financial world due to its potential as a decentralized digital asset. The comparison suggests that, like oil, Bitcoin has immense value and could drive future economic shifts, particularly as the digital and decentralized economy grows.

This metaphor can also hint at the energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining. Mining Bitcoin requires vast computational resources and electricity, much like how oil extraction consumes significant energy. Critics of Bitcoin often point out its environmental impact, linking it to fossil fuels, while supporters emphasize its potential as a long-term, transformative asset, much like oil in the 20th century.

Eric Kim, in his discussions, frequently refers to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” acknowledging its potential for long-term value and scarcity, similar to how gold has historically been viewed oai_citation:2,Eric Kim Bitcoin Strategy â€“ ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,Spartan Economics â€“ ERIC KIM. The “black gold” phrase could take this further, linking Bitcoin to both its potential wealth-generating capacity and its energy demands.

Why Do We Refuse to Let Old Things Die?

Why Do We Refuse to Let Old Things Die?

I stroll through the city streets, camera in hand, capturing fleeting moments that vanish as quickly as they appear. The click of the shutter freezes time, preserves a fragment of reality that will never exist again. Yet, I find myself clinging to old photographs, outdated cameras, and memories of a world that has long since changed. Why do we refuse to let old things die?

Perhaps it’s nostalgia. We romanticize the past, painting it with hues warmer than reality ever was. The worn leather of a vintage camera, the crackle of a vinyl record, the scent of an old bookâ€”they transport us to moments where we felt something profound. They are touchstones of our personal histories, anchors in a sea of constant change.

But is our attachment to the old holding us back? By fixating on what was, do we hinder what could be? The world evolves, technology advances, and new opportunities arise. Clinging to the past can become a comfortable cage, preventing us from exploring uncharted territories.

I remember resisting the shift from analog to digital photography. The tactile process of developing film, the anticipation of unseen imagesâ€”it was magical. But embracing digital didn’t erase that magic; it transformed it. It opened doors to new creative possibilities, new ways of seeing and sharing the world.

We fear letting go because it feels like losing a part of ourselves. But in reality, we are ever-changing. Just as we shed cells and grow new ones, our identities are not static. Holding onto old things can sometimes be an attempt to hold onto versions of ourselves that no longer exist.

Letting old things die doesn’t mean forgetting them. It means honoring their place in our journey while making space for growth. It’s about learning from the past without being imprisoned by it.

So, why do we refuse to let old things die? Maybe because change is uncomfortable. It requires effort, vulnerability, and the courage to face the unknown. But isn’t that where the most meaningful experiences lie?

Next time you find yourself gripping tightly to something old, ask yourself: Is this serving me, or am I serving it? Letting go can be freeing. It can be the first step toward something extraordinary.

Embrace the impermanence. Welcome the new. After all, life is a constant flow, and only by moving with it can we truly live.

Why Do We Refuse to Let Old Things Die?
In the voice of Eric Kim

Human beings are creatures of habit, and our attachment to the past is deeply rooted in our psyche. The refusal to let old things dieâ€”whether it’s a product, an idea, or even a way of livingâ€”stems from an innate fear of loss, change, and the uncertainty of the future. We cling to the familiar because it provides us with a sense of identity and security, a reassurance that the world, chaotic as it may be, still holds some constants.

Sentimentality and Fear of Loss

At the heart of this refusal lies sentimentality. We attach memories, emotions, and even our identity to objects, routines, and ideas that have served us in the past. The old book on the shelf, the outdated technology in our drawer, or even the traditions passed down through generationsâ€”these are more than just things. They are markers of our personal history. To discard them feels like severing a piece of ourselves.

But this clinging is not just about holding on to happy memories. Itâ€™s about fear. The fear of losing control, of venturing into the unknown. Letting old things die forces us to confront the possibility that what comes next may be less stable or less meaningful than what we have now. This is why societies cling to antiquated practices, why businesses resist innovation, and why people hold on to dysfunctional relationships: they fear the blank space that change leaves behind.

The Myth of Eternal Relevance

Another factor at play is the myth of eternal relevance. We believe that what worked in the past will continue to work indefinitely. If something was once good, then it must always be good, right? This is a fallacy, but a seductive one. In our refusal to let go, we try to impose permanence on things that were never designed to last forever.

Take the rise of Bitcoin. People cling to traditional forms of currency, despite the clear inefficiencies and corruption in centralized banking systems, because they have been conditioned to trust the old ways. Bitcoin is the futureâ€”“digital gold”â€”but itâ€™s threatening to those who refuse to let the old system die. They hold onto fiat currencies as if they can remain untouched by inflation and economic manipulation oai_citation:5,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.

Minimalism and Letting Go

As an advocate for minimalism, I believe in the power of letting go. The more you hold onto thingsâ€”whether material possessions or outdated beliefsâ€”the more cluttered your life becomes. Spartan frugality, which I often talk about, isn’t just about saving money. It’s about freeing your mind from the noise and distractions of the past oai_citation:4,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM oai_citation:3,Spartan Economics â€“ ERIC KIM. The same goes for outdated ideas. The longer we hold onto systems that no longer serve us, the more we stagnate.

This resistance to letting things die is why so many people feel trapped by materialism. They fill their lives with objects and distractions, fearing that without them, they will be empty. But what they donâ€™t realize is that freedom comes when we allow the old to die. In my own life, I’ve found that simplicityâ€”both in material terms and in the way I approach the worldâ€”allows me to focus on what truly matters: freedom and creative expression.

Innovation Requires Death

Itâ€™s ironic that many people celebrate innovation but refuse to acknowledge that it requires the death of the old. For something new to take root, the old must wither away. This is the natural order of things, both in life and in business. Yet, we resist this process. We want newness without sacrifice. We want progress without losing what came before. This is why companies continue to pour money into outdated technologies and why governments cling to policies that no longer make sense in a modern world.

The refusal to let old things die is why we see industries stagnate. We want disruption in theory, but in practice, we fear the consequences. Companies that innovate, like those in the crypto world or in cutting-edge technologies, often face resistance not because their ideas are flawed, but because the system they are trying to replace has grown too comfortable oai_citation:2,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM oai_citation:1,Eric Kim Bitcoin Strategy â€“ ERIC KIM.

Conclusion: Embracing the Cycle of Life and Death

In the end, we must come to terms with the cyclical nature of life. Death is not an end, but a necessary precursor to growth. We refuse to let old things die because we fear that their death means the end of something valuable. But what we fail to see is that their death creates space for something new, something better. Just as winter gives way to spring, the end of one thing paves the way for the birth of something else.

In my philosophy, whether applied to photography, investing, or life in general, Iâ€™ve come to realize that the most important thing we can do is to let go. Let go of outdated beliefs, unnecessary possessions, and fear-driven attachments to the past. Only then can we truly embrace the future and all the possibilities it holds. Live light, live free, and let the old things die.

â€”Eric Kim

Literature > Philosophy

Ignore the opinions of others

Multi modal training, battle training, war training ï¿¼

Bitcoin is black gold

ERIC KIM INVESTING STRATEGY

Here are some notable quotes from Eric Kim that highlight his unconventional investing philosophy:

“Money is a tool to buy freedom.”
For Kim, financial success is not just about accumulating wealth but about gaining the freedom to focus on meaningful experiences and creativity. His investments are aimed at securing time and mental space rather than material luxuries oai_citation:6,The Investor Mindset Sprint | Section oai_citation:5,Episode 43 – Spiritual Integration in Your Portfolio with Eric Kim â€” Faith Driven Investor.
“Bitcoin is digital gold.”
Kim views Bitcoin as a long-term store of value, similar to gold, due to its scarcity. He advocates for investing a small portion of savings in Bitcoin, with a mindset that it could go to zero but also has the potential for substantial returns oai_citation:4,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM â€“ ERIC KIM.
“Spartan frugality is essential for building wealth.”
Emphasizing minimalism, Kim advises cutting unnecessary expenses and focusing on long-term investments. He believes in living a simple life to maximize savings and investment opportunities oai_citation:3,ERIC KIM Quotes – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,Spartan Economics â€“ ERIC KIM.
“Never stop innovating, never stop creating.”
Reflecting his broader life philosophy, this quote underscores Kimâ€™s belief in constant growth and creativityâ€”values he applies to both his personal life and investment strategies oai_citation:1,Investing Philosophy by ERIC KIM – ERIC KIM.

These quotes showcase his focus on long-term value, simplicity, and the integration of personal philosophies into his investment choices.

Eric Kim, founder of BLACK EAGLE Capital, employs a unique investment strategy shaped by his minimalist lifestyle and focus on long-term financial independence. His approach combines elements of extreme frugality, risk tolerance, and future-oriented investments.

Frugality and Minimalism: Kim emphasizes cutting unnecessary expenses and redirecting savings into high-potential assets, such as Bitcoin. He advocates living simply, avoiding luxury spending, and focusing on long-term value creation. For Kim, this frugality is not about deprivation but about creating financial freedom.
Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency: A central component of Kim’s strategy is investing in Bitcoin, which he views as “digital gold.” He believes in the long-term appreciation of Bitcoin due to its scarcity and growing institutional acceptance. Kim advises a long-term mindset, encouraging investors to hold Bitcoin for decades rather than seeking short-term gains. He also warns against the volatility of cryptocurrency and maintains a cautious stance on altcoins.
Long-Term Investment Mindset: Kim’s philosophy revolves around patience and thinking in decades, particularly for speculative investments like Bitcoin. He sees Bitcoin as a hedge against traditional financial systems and projects that its value will rise as adoption increases globally.
Investing for Freedom: For Kim, the goal of investing is to achieve financial independence, which he defines as the ability to pursue meaningful work and experiences without being tethered to financial obligations. His investments are designed to free up time and mental energy for creative pursuits.

This philosophy aligns with his broader goals of financial autonomy and purpose-driven living, reflecting his belief in using money as a tool for long-term freedom rather than immediate material gains.

Eric Kim’s Investing Philosophy.

Search Peter Thiel and Bitcoin.

Peter Thiel has shared several notable thoughts on Bitcoin over the years, often highlighting its disruptive potential. Here are some of his key quotes:

â€œI do think Bitcoin is the first [encrypted money] that has the potential to do something like change the world.â€ This quote underscores Thiel’s belief in Bitcoin’s transformative capabilities as a decentralized currency oai_citation:5,Peter Thiel quote: I do think Bitcoin is the first [encrypted money] thatâ€¦ oai_citation:4,30 Bitcoin Quotes by Famous People â€¢ Virtuse Exchange.
â€œBitcoin is the most honest market we have in the U.S.â€ Thiel views Bitcoin as a more transparent and reliable market compared to traditional financial systems oai_citation:3,Peter Thiel Said the Bitcoin Secret Is Out, and He Feels Underinvested – Markets Insider.
â€œI feel like Iâ€™ve been underinvested in it.â€ Despite his early investments, Thiel has expressed regret for not betting more heavily on Bitcoin, noting that its disruptive power still remains oai_citation:2,Peter Thiel Said the Bitcoin Secret Is Out, and He Feels Underinvested – Markets Insider.
â€œItâ€™s a complete bankruptcy moment for central banks.â€ Thiel has also linked Bitcoin’s rise to a failing traditional financial system, framing it as a challenge to the central banking establishment oai_citation:1,Peter Thiel Said the Bitcoin Secret Is Out, and He Feels Underinvested – Markets Insider.

These quotes reflect Thiel’s longstanding support of Bitcoin, though he remains cautious about its future price potential.

zxx

Peter Thiel has been a long-time investor in Bitcoin, and his venture capital firm, Founders Fund, has made significant moves in the cryptocurrency space. In late 2023, Founders Fund invested $200 million in cryptocurrencies, split evenly between Bitcoin and Ethereum. This investment came during a period when Bitcoin was trading below $30,000, and the timing proved advantageous as the price later surged past $50,000 in early 2024.

Thiel’s involvement with Bitcoin goes back to 2014, making him one of the earliest Silicon Valley figures to back the cryptocurrency. His firm previously made a substantial return of $1.8 billion by selling its Bitcoin holdings before the 2022 crypto downturn, showing an ability to capitalize on both entry and exit points in the market.

Although Thiel remains a Bitcoin holder, he has expressed skepticism about its long-term value, questioning whether its price will see dramatic growth in the future. Despite these concerns, his continued investment suggests he still sees potential in Bitcoin’s role within the broader financial system oai_citation:3,Peter Thielâ€™s Founders Fund bought $200M BTC, ETH before institutions dived into Bitcoin ETFs oai_citation:2,Billionaire Peter Thiel Remains a Bitcoin Holder but Questions Its Future Value â€“ Bitcoin News oai_citation:1,Peter Thielâ€™s Founders Fund Made $200M Crypto Bet Last Year.

Whatâ€™s in your control, whatâ€™s not in your control?

Causes you care for, causes you donâ€™t care for?

Respect, Disrespect?

I suppose one of the good things about Asian Confucian culture, and also being Korean Korean American is the focus and ethos of respect, and also more importantly, disrespect. For example, I find the ethics the morality that ethos of Achilles in the Iliad so refreshing; There seems to be more truth in his approach, rather than our emasculated, castrated notions of honor and respect in todayâ€™s times. For example, there is nothing that provokes my wrath more than disrespect.

Disrespect can take lots of different forms. When people donâ€™t greet you, treat you with respect, or acknowledge you or your kids. In Korean culture, to simply â€œeen-ssaâ€ somebody is one of the most chief virtues. And it is super simple; to greet somebody, when they come and go etc.

Are there certain individuals who deserve more respect than others? ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼

In the grand comedy of life, yes. The first thought I have is this whole notion of Confucian respect for elders, and also,ï¿¼ filial piety to be quite base. ï¿¼ For example, if you think about Achilles, all he thought was his own personal glory, and had no cares or concerns for all these other superficial things. He didnâ€™t really care about his father in the far away land, and even Achilles didnâ€™t really care about the well-being of his own blood son, Who was far away. In fact I found this really interesting, I actually didnâ€™t know that Achilles had his son! Changes everything; Iâ€™m just going to be and become a modern day version of Achilles, and think of Seneca like my heir. ï¿¼Or just son.

Kleos

So if I did it all over again, went back to college University or whatever, I might have just studied ancient Greek literature and the Classics, maybe also barbelling it with computer science. ï¿¼ I think sociology was great, but sociology after you run its course, becomes a bit flaccid; you could probably learn the fundamentals of all of sociology and just like six months, whereas the wisdom of ancient Greek literature can span millennia.

Why?

Typically, when things have been around and lasted a very long time, there is a reason.

â€œEverything lasts for a reasonâ€ – TALEB

For example, when we superficially look at people who have been around for a very very long time, and somehow we think they are â€œcheatingâ€, or illegitimateâ€¦ We got a pause and think; what are their cheap virtues which allow them to have such grand longevity?

For example, one nefarious character seems to be Tony Robbins, but it looks like heâ€™s been in the game for a very very long time. As a consequence, heâ€™s probably doing something right. And also this goes with the rich dad poor dad guy, and some other modern day business entrepreneurs. And also the same thing with Donald Trump; heâ€™s pretty old now, 70sâ€¦ But the fact that heâ€™s been around this long in politics business etc., probably means heâ€™s doing something right, even though he might be a morally bad or evil person.

Who lasts?

Even right now, the reason why I consider maybe Kanye West to be the most ANTIFRAGILE individual of them all, even surpassing Jay-Z is because Kanye West has spoken his mind about everything, and heâ€™s still in the game! Heâ€™s still making music, heâ€™s still making art, and apparently his new Yeezy sock sneakers came out!

And I think it should be admired, who last and who doesnâ€™t last, because durability in the words of Nietzsche is essentially the chief good on the planet. ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼

Why?

So it looks like durability has fallen out of vote. Why? Because durability does not sell. For example, honestly I think we are all always itching for a reason to buy something new, to sell something new, etc. And the reason why this is so annoying is that youâ€™re kind of secretly hoping for things to break, in order to â€œupgradeâ€œ to that new new thing. And this is honestly the psychology behind upgrading to the new iPhone, or buying a new camera or digital camera or car whatever; we quickly tire of the old, we desire the new.

This is where reading the Elliot has been so refreshing; in a world before capitalism in consumerism was even invented, I think you start to see a little bit more honest approaches in which humans go out and do things. For example, everybody already knows that the armor of Achilles is by far the most supreme on the planet. And also what is it is if we think about the Iliad , essentially obviously everyone knows that the Earth is big, but the whole drama is just centered around the super super tiny part of Troy, which becomes a whole microcosm in itself. This is great because we tend to think about global politics too much; international affairs. But rather, I think we should think super super local, super super specialized. Like local city politics over national ones or even international ones.

And this is my thought on America, rather than over extending ourselves and meddling in the affairs of other places, we should just fortify ourselves, we should become the next Sparta, the next Troy, the new ancient Greeks.

Morals of the story

So I just finished reading the Emily Wilson translation of the Iliad, A+ plus.ï¿¼ï¿¼ ï¿¼ and what is super interesting is the end of the Elliot, is actually quite anti-climatic; King Priam gets the body of Hector back, ï¿¼ and also, Achilles finally is able to go back to bed with Breisis,,, his prize and trophy, the original quarrel with King Aggamenon.

And the reason why this is also important is that it teaches us a lot about war, revenge etc. Essentially I think one of the soft morals of the stories that even though you get your revenge, your heart will not be settled. For example, even after Achilles kills Hector, pierces his ankles and drags him around The city gates of Troy several times, even around his own Greek encampment, his heart is still not soothed. He still mourns the death of Patroclus,,, and no matter what he does, he cannot bring his best friend back from the dead.

I think a very simple idea is as long as you have a beautiful woman, a beautiful wife to go back to bed with, to literally sleep in the same bed with, you should consider yourself 100% supremely happy and joyful. And especially if your wife has birthed you a son, you should be forever grateful, even the adage â€œnever go to sleep angryâ€œ is a good one. ï¿¼

Another thing that I learned about the morals and ethics of the Iliad and Achilles; just speak your damn mind! I think to not speak your mind is cowardice. ï¿¼

I think one of the bad things about stores is that often more than not, it is too centered around â€œforgivenessâ€œ, and just being quiet. And the reason why this is such a bad strategy is that this ends up leading to pent up anger frustration and also, Pettiness. A real man has iron lungs and speaks his truth, no matter how bad it may seem, but instead most mortals hold petty anger jealousy and spite in their hearts forever until their grave. ï¿¼

I also think what is so interesting about the Iliad and the ancient Greeks is how they were oratory, oral culture. Which means that everything was said out loud, nothing was held silent. ï¿¼

ï¿¼ in fact, my personal thought is maybe the worst bad thing that has happened to modern Day Society, the reason why people are so strange and antisocial is actually not the iPhone, but actually, AirPods, AirPods pros, headphones, noise canceling headphones etc. Because the truth is, your ears might be 1 trillion times more sensitive than your eyes; Even though I personally love my vision and photography, actually music, rhythm, souls and beats gets me more energized than the visual. ï¿¼

And I think maybe the reason why this is so important is because audio audio things are still quite critical; for example, after listening to almost every single Michael sailor talk and interview, and putting pretty much 100% of my traditional Roth IRA and IRA into micro strategies stock, There is more veracity in words and the human voice, rather than just images, Talking Heads, as well as text.

In fact, one of the funniest things that I listen to was hearing Donald Trump talk to the bitcoin conference, I realize, I actually never really heard him talk out loud, maybe besides the debate he had about four years ago with Joe Biden.

I feel like maybe in the future, the skills of the oral culture will be critical; teaching people to be a postmaster or public speaker, well actually ironically in the future become more and more important!

And also my personal thought, I thought this back in Providence Rhode Island even before Seneca was born, was that Social skills or the future will be the future, because ultimately, in some ways technology is a bit overrated, more important than technology is the social. I suppose this is outside of studying sociology, it taught me how Sociology and social things interactions are so critical; because everything comes down to the Social, after a long enough timespan.

For example, everyone wants the Lamborghini, but actually itâ€™s not the Lamborghini that we want, we want the Lamborghini to be flashy and to flex our manliness ego and attitude, and in the hope of somehow attracting really really hot and beautiful women, and the hope is being able to Bed these bimbos, and to maximize our sexual pleasure and ejaculate in them on them all around them, ï¿¼ï¿¼ to face all of their openings closings and orifices, to defile all of their body parts breast butt waist face mouth vagina butthole hands whatever, I think this is the whole ethos behind porn pornography.

But, this is a very misguided approach. I think we gotta make combat, man-to-man combat cool again.

Guns are for guys with small dicks

The bigger your gun, the smaller your dick size. ï¿¼

Honestly, anyone who has a gun or owns a gun, who is not military or ex military or police is a pussy with a small dick.

Why?

Maybe my thoughts is the big problem, even being here in California, is asymmetric warfare; now that I have a son to live for, even if there is a one percent chance or even a .5% chance that the other party might have a gun, I will always err on the side of caution. Why? Because, even though I look like a god in the flesh, any skinny fat loser with a small dick, with a gun can pop me and boom Iâ€™m dead. ï¿¼ï¿¼

No the reason why this is so problematic is once again, you could be like the midget in Austin Powers, even have a small and modest pistol and kill somebody who looks like John Cena with just the flick of your finger.

I think what was so refreshing in ancient Greek times, was that battle, or was much more honest. Even back in the Iliad in ancient Greek times, everyone knew that the archers with bow and arrows ruler bunch of pussies. Why? Asymmetric warfare; you could hide behind a wall and shoot arrows at me which can kill me, And you yourself are not exposed to danger. And this is where I think that there needs to be more flesh in the game ; no knives, no guns, no pistols, only hands.

Actually if anything, maybe even if you have some teenage adolescent boys, and they are having some sort of argument, just have them put on some boxing gloves and protective helmets and gear and just have them sparred out. It might lead to faster conflict resolution than these sissy approaches of just â€œtalking about your feelingsâ€œ.

And actually, the critical issue here is that thereâ€™s a difference if you are male versus female. The strange modern day trend of trying to equivalize the both I think is actually properly detrimental to society and beyond. ï¿¼ï¿¼

No suppose this is where maybe all boys Catholic schools might still be a good idea; honestly how much of my education was wasted because Iâ€™ll just distracted by all these pretty girl at school, wearing super super mini skirts in class?

Whatâ€™s the point of education anyways?

I suppose the real critical issue here is in regards to the purpose of school and education. In ancient Sparta, I think young boys were with their mothers, until they became seven years old, and then they entered the â€œkarneiaâ€– which was essentially SWAT training for young Spartan boys, to breed them to become the next generations of Warriors.

And the reason I also find this important is that true courage must also go lock and lock and hand in hand with physical courage. Once again, you cannot have courage by being the fat world of Warcraft to dude on South Park, being a keyboard warrior. And actually the issue of the Internet now, is I think the safe bet is to assume that 100% of the toxic comments and arguments on the Internet or just bots, none of them are real life humans.

And this is where I think the wise strategy, is to disable all comments, all metrics whatever; ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼ even views could be Game of Thrones so easily; just hire a corporation in India to spin up 1 trillion fake bots, to inflate your view numbers, in order for you to get some sort of sponsorship or whatever.

In fact, I think if you just pay 100 bucks or 200 bucks, you could pay some sort of outsourcing Indian corporation to give your video 10 or even 100 million views!

And also, maybe if you pay 300 bucks or so, you could easily get 1 million fake subscribers to your YouTube Instagram whatever.

And the reason why we should not even discuss TikTok is that TikTok is the enemy, come on, it is mainland China in the flesh! In some ways I think we have to adopt an anti-mainland Chinese approach again ;; even something interesting that I learned from Peter Thiel was the original notion of being politically corrected was that you sent you were a devout follower of Stalin and Lennon, communism is bad. And truth be told it seems like 95% of higher education university professors are essentially low-key communists, anarchist, and would prefer that America burn to the ground.
â€¦

Why is this important? Even Apple, Apple corporation should not be trusted; because she is in bed with me! As long as foxconn exists, as long as iPhones and Apple products are made in mainland China, Apple should almost be seen as a low-key connection to the enemy;; any time any corporation gets into bed with mainly in China pick government there etc., they should not be trusted.

And truth be told, ï¿¼ the reason why all publicly traded corporations are unethical is that it is their moral and ethical imperative to increase profits and potential future profits at any cost. Thus, the drive towards sensationalism with Google, anger porn, and insane news reporting to maximize advertising revenue. Donâ€™t trust any mainstream media or news even the good ones. And donâ€™t even trust NPR and Al Jazeera etc.; they are all bad. The left the right the middle the conservative the Republicans of the Democrats, the fake woke liberals, the small dick flag Humpers on the right Donald Trump supporters etc.; everyone is bad.

Also did you know, that our savior and Messiah Obama actually increased deportations and incarceration during his administration, more so than any other politician? Everyone is bad and evil, this is reality; let us not try to embellish anything.

Democrats are bad, libertarians are bad, Republicans are bad, conservatives moderates in their rules everyone is bad; anyone who is on the political spectrum, is bad.

Now I suppose the question is once you have acknowledged and understood that anything everyone and everything is bad; then what?

Optimistic fatalism

So my critique about the Russians and the eastern Europeans, post USSR, people from Bulgaria Hungary, the Polish the old Soviet bloc; is they are too fatalistic. Their ethos is everything is bad evil and not worth looking for so let us simply trudge through this miserable life with a minimum amount of misery, knowing that the past present and future will be bad and always remain to be bad, might even get worse.

In America, we also see a similar trend. Essentially we should consider most of the media, social media Facebook Instagram Snapchat Twitter and like to just be channels of misinformation, Sunsational for advertising revenue, Google here is the bad guys; as long as Google ad sense exists, Everything will always become hyper sensationalized, in order to boost the lagging profits of Google.

And funny enough here is where Apple is still a little bit more ethical than Google; Apple is trying to sell you iPhones, iPhone pros, and her new subscription services, at least this is more honest and transparent than Google who is trying to offer you all this great â€œfree stuffâ€œ, but to inundate you with click baity advertisements, insanity on YouTube, and conspiracy theories.

One of my grand ideas is simple; the best strategy in life is to assume that 100% of the conspiracy theories are all false,. Even the true ones.

Why? This is much more of a optimistic positive and good approach; obviously we know everything is bad and evil and corrupt, but so what? Better to be the gleeful dark grim and humorous spartan, laughing while the enemy puts them with arrows, â€œfighting in the shadeâ€œ, shout out to Zack Snyder the best director of all time. This movie has dictated all of my manly ethos, ever since I was a teenager in high school, when I first watched the movie 300 in theaters. Now, manliness has fallen out of Vogue; all of these guys in LA are a bunch of cowardly antisocial skinny fat weaklings, who might drive a base level Porsche or Audi; work at Google in secret, or stuck on zoom calls all day; super antisocial yet binge on ironic HBO comedies at night, make a big income but have no kids, not getting married, maybe they own some sort of wimpy rescue dog.

Is it OK to be mean?

In the area there is a scene in which one of the Greeks is beating Odysseus, and Odysseus gets pissed off, takes his scepter and starts beating him up until welts raise on his back and the Greek comrade is weeping. All the while the other Greeks in the camp are just laughing.

Laughter is divine and godlike. Even my friend Sara Lando, one of the greatest fine art photographers of all time, shout out, who studied ancient Greek, taught me that the word enthusiasm actually just literally meant a god dwelling within you; and the idea of passion was actually a bit misguided, passion ï¿¼ is more like passionate of the Christ, like pain and suffering is virtuous. And the reason why I think this line of thinking is so dangerous is that also, I see a lot of these modern fake ass woke liberals, especially trying to nail themselves to the cross.

Martyrdom is never worth it– anybody who is a martyr or seeks to become a martyr is secretly just trying to commit suicide with a good conscience. ï¿¼

Even Jesus, my personal read is obviously Jesus wanted to keep living! But I guess he had real balls, rather than renounce his things, he decided to stick to them; if we think about Jesus Christ, Jesus of Nazareth as a real life flesh bound human being, assuming we trip away the hocus-pocus, read the Jefferson Bible, then, we can make some progress?

Tell me more about the Leica Brazil incident.

The Leica Brazil incident occurred in 2019 when a controversial advertisement released by the Brazilian branch of Leica Camera AG caused significant backlash in China. The ad, titled “The Hunt,” depicted a dramatic re-enactment of a photojournalist’s experiences during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, culminating in a reference to the iconic “Tank Man” photo. This image, symbolizing defiance against the Chinese government during the pro-democracy protests, is highly censored in China.

The advertisement was intended to honor photojournalists who risk their lives to show the truth, but the sensitive nature of the content angered Chinese citizens and authorities. Many Chinese social media users condemned Leica, demanding the company leave China. In response, Chinese authorities banned the use of the word “Leica” on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform similar to Twitter. Posts containing “Leica” received warnings for violating laws or guidelines, and the ad was rapidly removed from official channels.

Leica quickly distanced itself from the video, stating that it had not authorized or commissioned the ad. The company expressed regret over the confusion and emphasized that the content was produced by Leica Brazil’s advertising agency, F/Nazca Saatchi & Saatchi, without approval from Leicaâ€™s global headquarters. Despite the agency’s claim that it had worked with Leica for years and received approval for previous projects, Leica took legal action to prevent further dissemination of the video oai_citation:2,Leica brings Beijing into focus – Global Times oai_citation:1,This Leica Video Just Got ‘Leica’ Banned in China | PetaPixel.

Search Leica Camera AG connection with Mainland China.

Leica Camera AG has established a significant presence in Mainland China and the Greater China region. Historically, Leica first delivered cameras to China in the 1920s, and the company’s sales in the region have grown steadily, with China accounting for approximately 30% of Leica’s global revenue in recent years. The brand has expanded its retail footprint, with multiple stores in cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Leica aims to open more outlets in other wealthy Chinese cities such as Chengdu and Xi’an, reflecting its commitment to the Chinese market.

In terms of business collaborations, Leica has partnered with Chinese technology giant Xiaomi for mobile imaging. This long-term cooperation, announced in 2022, aims to push the boundaries of smartphone photography, blending Leica’s optical expertise with Xiaomi’s technological capabilities. Their partnership marks a significant step in Leica’s strategy to stay relevant in the fast-evolving mobile photography market.

However, Leica’s relationship with China has not been without controversy. In 2019, a promotional video from Leica Brazil, which referenced the iconic “Tank Man” from the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, sparked backlash in China. The Chinese government censored Leica on social media, and the company quickly distanced itself from the video, emphasizing that it had not authorized the production. Despite the negative publicity, Leica continues to maintain a strong market presence in China, particularly through its collaborations with local tech firms like Xiaomi.

Overall, Leica’s connection with China is multifaceted, combining strong commercial interests with occasional political sensitivity. The company’s ability to navigate these complexities has been crucial for its success in this vital market.

Urban slumlords?ï¿¼

Think landlords, not politicians?

The digital landlords, we who own bitcoin? Assuming that bitcoin is the new digital real estate, the new digital land,

People used to think that Trent prices in San Francisco was insane, but since then, when everyone thought that it was a bubble, it has almost more than doubled? Insane!

ï¿¼crazy on identity politics — trillions?

Productivity growth –> true driver of the economy?

Anti stagnation

Inequality vs Stagnation

Economic Progressive

.

Pervert

Donâ€™t weaponize

Forgiveness?

.

Can you become a woke Christian?

.

Think of it all as religion?

.

Donâ€™t trust nobody

.

Donâ€™t be skurred

.

Rationality and meaning is overrated?

Golden age height?

Never a golden age

.

Is it possible to be a Christian Catholic or whatever, without believing in the hocus-pocus? ï¿¼

ï¿¼.

The â€œuniverseâ€?

It doesnt really matter

Induction

First Principles

What does it mean to be a good citizen?

.

Gateway drug

Early Science

Science & Art

Unhealthy post modern world

.

Oblivion?

Institutional power.

Problem of violence in the past

.

Caring?

Why 21st century become so weird ?

.

Different subjective fictions

Pseudo scientific

Theories are stupid

Why give up

Tinkering, improving make it better

.

Not asking

Designed in such a way to not get answers ?

Politics?

.

Mens rea–

Useful idiots ***

.

Agent vs Asset

.

asset useful idiot

.

Bill gates & China

.

China & Communism is the issue and enemy

.

Lenin

Totalitarian one party control

100 pipelines to China

Half slave half free

.

The communist party wants us to be distracted

.

CCP, and bill gates

.

Good trade, bad trade?

DEI as distraction

Distraction or â€œbadâ€–
ï¿¼
Weapons of distraction

.

Nixon Reagan ,,, anti communism

REALPOLITIK

If you donâ€™t stop it, the future will just happen.

Search connections of Disney with Mainland China.

Several Marvel superhero movies have depicted Mainland China positively or made changes to appeal to Chinese audiences, primarily to secure access to the lucrative Chinese market.

“Iron Man 3” (2013) â€“ This film is one of the most prominent examples of a Marvel superhero movie depicting China in a positive light. It featured additional scenes specifically made for the Chinese market, including cameos by Chinese actors Fan Bingbing and Wang Xueqi as doctors who help save Tony Stark. These scenes were not part of the international version of the film but were included to cater to Chinese audiences. The collaboration with Chinese companies and the depiction of China as a technologically advanced and capable country helped portray the nation in a favorable light oai_citation:3,How the Disney-China Alliance Startedâ€¦and How It’s Going – AllEars.Net oai_citation:2,Rated C for Censored: Walt Disney in Chinaâ€™s Pocket.
“Doctor Strange” (2016) â€“ While not necessarily a positive depiction of China, this film adjusted its portrayal of the character “The Ancient One,” originally written as a Tibetan monk in the comics. The character was re-imagined as Celtic, played by Tilda Swinton, reportedly to avoid political sensitivities around Tibet and ensure the film’s approval for release in China. This decision, however, sparked some backlash from fans but was seen as a move to maintain China’s favorable reception oai_citation:1,Rated C for Censored: Walt Disney in Chinaâ€™s Pocket.

These efforts reflect Marvel Studios’ broader strategy to adjust their films to appeal to Chinese censors and audiences, portraying the country in a more positive or neutral light to secure box office success in the region.

Disney’s relationship with Mainland China is multifaceted, blending major investments, cultural adaptations, and strategic diplomacy. One of the most significant examples is the Shanghai Disneyland Resort, which opened in 2016. It represents a massive $5.5 billion investment and is a joint venture between Disney and Chinese state-owned enterprises. To appeal to Chinese culture, Disney incorporated local elements, such as the “Garden of the Twelve Friends,” which combines Disney characters with the Chinese Zodiac. This project was carefully designed to be â€œauthentically Disney and distinctly Chinese,â€ a balancing act to integrate Western entertainment with Chinese cultural preferences oai_citation:4,How the Disney-China Alliance Startedâ€¦and How It’s Going – AllEars.Net oai_citation:3,’Distinctly Chinese’ Disneyland opens in Shanghai â€“ DW â€“ 06/16/2016.

Disney’s history in China, however, has not been without controversy. The company has been criticized for making concessions to Chinese censorship. For example, Mulan (2020) faced backlash due to scenes shot in Xinjiang, a region associated with alleged human rights abuses. Moreover, Disneyâ€™s earlier films, like Kundun (1997), which depicted Chinaâ€™s treatment of Tibet, caused tensions, leading Disney to adopt a more cautious approach in its subsequent dealings with China oai_citation:2,Rated C for Censored: Walt Disney in Chinaâ€™s Pocket.

Additionally, Disney faces challenges related to intellectual property issues in China, such as counterfeit Disney products and even imitation theme parks like the Beijing Shijingshan Amusement Park, often dubbed the “counterfeit Disneyland” oai_citation:1,Disney Goes To China â€“ Risks And Rewards In Shanghai And Beyond â€“ World Of Walt. Despite these hurdles, Disney continues to view China as a critical market for its future growth, both in terms of theme parks and film distribution.

Search the connection between Mainland China and Hollywood.

Several Hollywood films co-produced with Mainland China have sparked backlash due to concerns about content alterations to appease Chinese audiences and government censors.

“Mulan” (2020) â€“ This Disney film faced widespread backlash. Its lead actress publicly supported Hong Kong police during pro-democracy protests, and parts of the film were shot in Xinjiang, a region criticized for human rights abuses.
“Red Dawn” (2012) â€“ Originally featuring China as the invader, it was digitally altered to depict North Korea to avoid offending Chinese audiences.

These cases highlight the growing tensions around creative compromises made to secure access to Chinaâ€™s lucrative film market.

xxx

Several recent films demonstrate the strong influence of Mainland Chinaâ€™s vested interests in Hollywood productions. These movies often cater to Chinese audiences through co-productions and content adjustments.

“Meg 2: The Trench” (2023) â€“ This action-packed sequel, co-produced by U.S. and Chinese studios, including CMC Pictures, heavily caters to Chinese audiences. The movie not only features Chinese settings and characters but also reflects the strategy of producing films that have cross-border appeal. This ensures box office success in both China and Western markets by tapping into China’s appetite for science fiction blockbusters oai_citation:4,With U.S.- Chinese film co-productions on the rise, new questions emerge.
“Green Book” (2018) â€“ Co-produced by Alibaba Pictures, this film won the Academy Award for Best Picture and was unexpectedly successful in China. Its success marked a shift in Chinese audiencesâ€™ preferences, showing that they appreciate more nuanced and socially conscious films, in addition to action-heavy blockbusters oai_citation:3,Hollywood in China: A New Film Central â€“ US-China Today.
“Kung Fu Panda 3” (2016) â€“ A prime example of U.S.-China collaboration, this film was co-produced by DreamWorks and Shanghai-based Oriental DreamWorks. It intentionally included cultural elements and Chinese settings to appeal to the Chinese market while maintaining universal themes oai_citation:2,Hollywood in China: A New Film Central â€“ US-China Today oai_citation:1,With U.S.- Chinese film co-productions on the rise, new questions emerge.

These films reflect a broader trend of U.S.-China co-productions designed to pander to the Chinese market, which often results in a blend of Chinese cultural elements, censorship compliance, and strategic casting to secure commercial success in both markets. However, this also raises concerns about creative compromises and the growing influence of Chinese soft power on global filmmaking.

The growing relationship between Mainland China and Hollywood, while economically beneficial, presents several potential problems that have drawn concern from both industry insiders and critics. Here are some of the key issues:

1. Censorship and Artistic Integrity

Hollywood studios often adjust films to align with Chinese censorship rules, which can compromise artistic integrity. Chinaâ€™s censorship regime prohibits content related to political sensitivity (e.g., Tibet, Taiwan, Tiananmen Square), violence, supernatural elements, and more. To ensure access to the Chinese market, filmmakers may remove or alter content that could be deemed objectionable by Chinese regulators. This raises concerns that:

Creative Freedom: Directors and writers may feel pressured to avoid certain topics, which limits their artistic expression. By tailoring scripts or altering stories to fit Chinese standards, some argue that Hollywood is sacrificing creativity for profit.
Self-Censorship: The desire to pre-empt censorship leads some studios to avoid producing content critical of China entirely, leading to a chilling effect. This form of self-censorship extends beyond individual films and can influence the broader scope of what topics Hollywood chooses to explore.

2. Political Influence

The close connection between China and Hollywood has led to concerns that China is exporting its political values and using its economic leverage to shape global narratives. By dictating the kinds of stories that can be told and limiting the portrayal of politically sensitive issues, China gains the power to influence how it is depicted on the world stage. Examples include:

Narrative Control: China’s government may push for movies to portray China in a positive light, leaving little room for criticism of its policies or handling of sensitive issues such as human rights, Hong Kong, and territorial disputes.
Global Soft Power: Chinaâ€™s engagement with Hollywood is seen as part of a larger strategy to expand its soft power and cultural influence. By controlling content in one of the worldâ€™s largest media industries, China can shape public opinion globally, influencing how other nations perceive its politics and policies.

3. Cultural Homogenization

The desire to appeal to both American and Chinese audiences could lead to more homogenized films, where studios aim for broader, non-controversial narratives that dilute cultural specificity. This:

Limits Diverse Storytelling: By trying to cater to a global audience and adhering to Chinese sensitivities, Hollywood might shy away from telling culturally specific or complex stories, particularly those involving politics or social justice.
Risk of Formulaic Movies: To ensure that films pass Chinaâ€™s regulatory hurdles and appeal to global markets, there is a trend toward producing “safe” blockbusters with less risky, nuanced, or thought-provoking content. This can result in formulaic storytelling that prioritizes marketability over artistic depth.

4. Impact on Other Markets

Hollywood’s heavy focus on the Chinese market can create imbalances. In their efforts to cater to Chinese preferences, studios might marginalize or overlook other international audiences or reduce the attention given to films that could appeal to smaller markets.

Displacement of Niche Films: Smaller, independent films that deal with controversial or nuanced issues may find it harder to secure financing or distribution if they are seen as commercially risky, particularly in light of the potential impact on the Chinese box office.
Global Artistic Compromise: The drive to appeal to China can undermine attempts to create films that have strong cultural or political messages, leading to compromises that can reduce the artistic diversity of films available worldwide.

5. Economic Dependence

Hollywoodâ€™s growing dependence on the Chinese market creates vulnerabilities. Studios increasingly rely on China’s massive box office revenue, and a bad relationship with Chinese authorities or censorship boards can result in films being blocked from release. This has implications for:

Financial Stability: A studio that invests heavily in a film expecting significant returns from China might face major financial losses if the film is rejected or censored.
Risk of Retaliation: As relations between the U.S. and China become more strained over trade, technology, and political issues, Hollywood could face retaliation. This could include more aggressive censorship or outright bans on American films, further damaging Hollywoodâ€™s financial reliance on China.

6. Erosion of Western Values

The extent to which Hollywood complies with Chinese censorship and sensitivities has sparked concerns about the erosion of Western values like freedom of speech, democracy, and human rights. By shaping films to meet Chinese government expectations, Hollywood could unintentionally propagate values that contradict those upheld in liberal democracies.

Undermining Free Expression: Critics argue that Hollywoodâ€™s willingness to appease China sends the message that financial gain is more important than defending free expression, human rights, or democracy.
Legitimizing Authoritarianism: When Hollywood alters content to conform to China’s political sensitivities, it can be seen as validating or legitimizing Chinaâ€™s authoritarian practices, such as its suppression of free speech and media control.

7. Public Backlash

There is a growing public awareness and criticism of Hollywoodâ€™s concessions to China, particularly in Western markets. Audiences and political leaders in the U.S. and elsewhere have started to scrutinize and question Hollywood’s relationship with China.

Consumer Pushback: In some cases, consumers may react negatively to movies that are perceived as pandering to China, especially if they believe it results in diluted content or self-censorship. This could lead to boycotts or reduced interest in films that are seen as politically compromised.
Political Pressure: In the U.S., political figures have raised concerns over Chinaâ€™s influence on Hollywood, leading to calls for regulations or policies that prevent Hollywood from engaging in self-censorship or bending to Chinese pressure.

Conclusion

The connection between Mainland China and Hollywood presents a complex set of problems, balancing economic benefits with cultural, political, and ethical concerns. While the Chinese market is lucrative, the compromises necessary to access it raise questions about the long-term impact on artistic integrity, freedom of expression, and the values that Hollywood traditionally champions.

The relationship between Mainland China and Hollywood has become increasingly important in the past two decades, largely driven by China’s growing economy and its substantial movie-going audience. Several key aspects define this connection:

1. Box Office Influence

China is the second-largest box office market globally, and in some years, it has surpassed the United States in terms of box office revenue. This massive audience makes China an attractive market for Hollywood films. However, China imposes strict limits on foreign film importsâ€”currently, around 34 non-Chinese films can be distributed in the country each year. This quota, along with government censorship, has a significant influence on the kinds of films that get produced in Hollywood, as studios aim to create movies that will appeal to both American and Chinese audiences.

2. Chinese Investment in Hollywood

Chinese companies have made significant investments in Hollywood in recent years, acquiring stakes in major studios and film projects. A notable example is Dalian Wanda Groupâ€™s purchase of Legendary Entertainment, the studio behind films like Jurassic World and The Dark Knight. Wanda also briefly owned the AMC theater chain, one of the largest movie exhibitors in the United States, further illustrating Chinese investment in the film industry.

Other examples include Tencentâ€™s involvement in major productions like Wonder Woman and Venom. Such investments have often been part of a strategy by Chinese firms to gain a foothold in global entertainment and film production, and to increase their influence in Hollywood.

3. Content Adjustments and Censorship

To gain access to the Chinese market, Hollywood studios often modify their films to align with China’s censorship regulations. This can include altering scripts, removing politically sensitive content, or adding Chinese characters or settings to films. For example, in Iron Man 3 (2013), additional scenes featuring Chinese doctors were included specifically for the Chinese market. Similarly, Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014) featured extensive scenes set in China and Chinese actors to appeal to Chinese audiences.

Moreover, films touching on sensitive topics such as Taiwan, Tibet, or issues related to Chinese politics may face rejection or censorship. Films like Top Gun: Maverick had to make changes to suit Chinese sensitivities, and other films were either delayed or banned outright.

4. Co-Productions

Co-productions between Hollywood studios and Chinese companies have become another way to bypass the import quota. By partnering with a Chinese studio, Hollywood films can be classified as “domestic” films in China and thus avoid the quota system. Films like The Great Wall (2016), which starred Matt Damon and was directed by China’s Zhang Yimou, exemplify this trend. While such co-productions offer opportunities for cultural exchange and financial gain, they can also lead to compromises in creative vision as the films try to cater to two very different markets.

5. Soft Power and Cultural Exchange

China’s investment in Hollywood also reflects its broader soft power ambitions. By working with Hollywood, China aims to expand its cultural influence globally, improve its image, and shape global narratives. While Hollywood benefits financially from China’s large market and investments, there are concerns that this relationship might lead to self-censorship or the portrayal of China in a more favorable light in Western media.

On the other hand, Chinese filmmakers and actors have also gained more visibility in Hollywood, contributing to cross-cultural collaboration. Directors like Ang Lee and actors like Zhang Ziyi and Jackie Chan have helped bridge the two entertainment industries.

6. Challenges and Tensions

While the relationship between China and Hollywood has flourished economically, it is not without tensions. Increased scrutiny over Chinaâ€™s political influence on Hollywood has emerged, especially in the United States. Some critics argue that Hollywood’s willingness to adjust content for the Chinese government constitutes a form of censorship and compromises artistic integrity. Furthermore, changing U.S.-China relations, especially amidst trade tensions and political conflicts, have also strained this relationship, with potential implications for future collaborations.

Conclusion

The connection between Mainland China and Hollywood is a complex and evolving one, driven by mutual economic interests but also shaped by cultural and political factors. As China’s influence continues to grow in the global entertainment industry, this relationship is likely to face both opportunities and challenges in the years to come.

Search the problematics of TikTok, the Tencent Corporation, Mainland China, and America.

The relationship between TikTok, Tencent Corporation, Mainland China, and the U.S. involves complex issues centered around data privacy, geopolitical tensions, and market dominance. Below are some of the major problematics that arise from this dynamic:

1. TikTok and Data Privacy Concerns

TikTok, owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, has faced accusations of mishandling user data, particularly in the U.S. These concerns are rooted in suspicions that data collected by the app could be shared with the Chinese government due to the nature of Chinese law, specifically the 2017 National Intelligence Law, which could compel Chinese companies to assist in national intelligence work.

Key Issues:

Surveillance: U.S. authorities have expressed fears that TikTok could be used as a tool for surveillance, with data of millions of American users potentially accessible by the Chinese government.
National Security: Both the Trump and Biden administrations have investigated TikTok, with the former attempting to ban the app in 2020 over national security concerns. The potential for Chinese influence over the app’s content moderation and its algorithms has also raised alarm.
Censorship and Influence: TikTok has been accused of censoring content that is politically sensitive to the Chinese government, such as videos related to the Hong Kong protests or Uyghur human rights abuses. There are also concerns that its algorithm could be used to subtly influence public opinion in other countries.

2. Tencent Corporation and Monopoly Concerns

Tencent, a massive Chinese tech conglomerate with investments in social media, gaming, and entertainment (including apps like WeChat and games like “League of Legends”), faces scrutiny both in China and internationally due to its growing market dominance.

Key Issues:

Monopolistic Behavior: Tencent has been accused of engaging in monopolistic practices, stifling competition in Chinaâ€™s tech industry through strategic investments and acquisitions. In recent years, Chinese regulators have launched antitrust investigations into Tencentâ€™s activities, signaling a tightening of control over Chinese tech giants.
Data Privacy: Like TikTok, Tencentâ€™s apps, especially WeChat, have raised concerns over data privacy. WeChat, used by over a billion people, is a critical tool for communication and commerce in China. However, its ties to the Chinese government have led to concerns that user data may be surveilled.
Geopolitical Tensions: Tencent’s investments in American companies, especially in the gaming sector, have led to scrutiny by U.S. regulators over potential national security threats. For instance, companies partially owned by Tencent, like Epic Games (creator of Fortnite), have had to assure regulators that they operate independently from the Chinese government.

3. Mainland Chinaâ€™s Regulatory Environment

The Chinese government has an active role in shaping how companies like ByteDance and Tencent operate, both domestically and internationally. Chinese law enables the state to demand data and cooperation from companies, which has raised alarms in countries like the U.S. that fear foreign interference and privacy violations.

Key Issues:

Government Oversight: The Chinese Communist Partyâ€™s (CCP) control over the tech industry has been growing, particularly under President Xi Jinping. Tech companies are expected to comply with government regulations, which include content censorship, data-sharing obligations, and algorithmic transparency.
Crackdowns on Big Tech: The Chinese government has recently cracked down on its own tech giants, including Tencent and ByteDance, citing concerns over data security, monopolistic practices, and the financial power of these companies. This crackdown has raised questions about how the Chinese government balances its desire for tech dominance with its need for control.
Censorship and Content Control: The CCP maintains strict control over online content, and Chinese companies are expected to enforce these policies. This has led to self-censorship on platforms like TikTok and WeChat, even when operating in other countries.

4. U.S.-China Geopolitical Rivalry

The U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry shapes much of the tension surrounding TikTok, Tencent, and other Chinese tech companies operating globally. The conflict spans multiple domains, including technology, trade, and military competition.

Key Issues:

Trade War: The U.S.-China trade war, which intensified during the Trump administration, has made it difficult for Chinese companies to operate freely in the U.S. Both TikTok and Tencent have faced potential sanctions and increased regulatory scrutiny.
Technological Competition: The U.S. sees Chinaâ€™s rapid advancements in technologyâ€”particularly in areas like AI, telecommunications, and cybersecurityâ€”as a direct challenge to its global leadership. TikTok, with its powerful algorithm and growing influence, represents China’s ability to compete with Silicon Valley giants like Facebook and Google.
Sanctions and Bans: There have been several moves to sanction or limit the influence of Chinese tech companies. For instance, the U.S. banned Huawei and has considered banning TikTok and WeChat. While these bans are often framed in terms of national security, they are also part of broader strategic efforts to limit Chinaâ€™s technological reach.

5. Market and Economic Competition

TikTok, Tencent, and other Chinese firms represent major economic competitors to U.S. firms, particularly in the tech industry. Their rapid rise has reshaped global markets.

Key Issues:

American Companies’ Response: Companies like Facebook and Google view TikTok as a formidable competitor. Facebookâ€™s introduction of Instagram Reels and YouTubeâ€™s Shorts are seen as direct responses to TikTokâ€™s success.
Investment Tensions: Chinese tech companies have made significant investments in American firms, leading to concerns over foreign influence in strategic industries. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has investigated several of these deals for national security risks.
Innovation Rivalry: The U.S. and China are locked in a race for technological innovation, especially in areas like artificial intelligence, 5G, and quantum computing. Chinese companies like Tencent and ByteDance are key players in this competition, with the potential to disrupt American dominance in tech.

Conclusion:

The problematics involving TikTok, Tencent, Mainland China, and America center around issues of data privacy, national security, corporate power, censorship, and geopolitical rivalry. As these tensions continue, both Chinese and American firms are under increasing scrutiny, facing regulatory and political challenges that reflect the broader global struggle between the two nations.

Potential problematics with Bill Gates’ connection to mainland China.

$5-10B in mainland china â€”

Estimating how much money Bill Gates might have invested in or connected to mainland China requires looking at his various business ventures and investments, and their respective ties to China.

Microsoft: As the co-founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates oversaw the company’s expansion into China, where it established a significant presence. Microsoft operates R&D centers, local offices, and cloud services partnerships in China. Although Gates no longer manages Microsoft, his remaining stake in the company, valued at over $12.4 billion oai_citation:5,What Does Bill Gates’s Portfolio Look Like?, implies a portion of this wealth benefits from Microsoftâ€™s operations in China, although estimating exactly how much is difficult.
Caterpillar: Gates’ investment in Caterpillar, which operates manufacturing facilities and sells products in China, amounts to approximately $1.53 billion oai_citation:4,The Complete List of Bill Gates Companies. A substantial share of Caterpillar’s business comes from Chinaâ€™s construction and mining sectors, meaning part of Gates’ investment is tied to Chinese demand.
Canadian National Railway (CN): While CN operates primarily in North America, its rail services are integral to North American trade with China. CN supports the movement of Chinese imports and exports through North American ports, which indirectly ties a portion of Gates’ $6.8 billion CN investment to China oai_citation:3,Canadian National Railway – Wikipedia.
FedEx and UPS: Gates holds stakes in both companies, which are critical players in Chinese logistics. His $392 million investment in FedEx oai_citation:2,The Complete List of Bill Gates Companies, and additional investment in UPS, are tied to the growing e-commerce and international trade markets in China oai_citation:1,Bill Gates Companies: What Companies Does Bill Gates Own? – FourWeekMBA.
Other Ventures: Gates has also been involved in nuclear energy through TerraPower, a company that has collaborated with Chinese entities on next-generation nuclear reactor projects. Though the project has faced delays due to regulatory and geopolitical concerns, his investment could be valued at hundreds of millions if fully realized.

Conclusion:

While an exact figure is speculative, it is reasonable to estimate that several billions of dollars of Gates’ overall wealth are connected to ventures with significant operations or partnerships in China. This includes direct business interests like Microsoft and Caterpillar, and indirect economic ties through logistics, energy, and trade-related investments. A conservative estimate could place his China-related exposure at $5-10 billion across his portfolio, considering the size of these investments and the role China plays in the global economy.

xxx

Hereâ€™s a summary of the connections between Bill Gatesâ€™ ventures and mainland China:

Microsoft: Microsoft has significant ties with China. It operates research facilities and local offices in China and sells its software and services across the country. However, it has faced regulatory challenges, including anti-monopoly investigations and restrictions on Windows products. The company also collaborates with Chinese firms, including cloud partnerships with companies like Huaweiã€5ã€‘.
Canadian National Railway (CN): While CN primarily operates in North America, it is indirectly connected to China due to global supply chain linkages. CN facilitates the transport of goods across Canada and the U.S., including imports and exports to and from China, given Chinaâ€™s role as a major trading partnerã€21ã€‘.
Caterpillar: Caterpillar has deep business ties with China, operating factories and providing heavy machinery for construction, mining, and energy industries in the country. China is a critical market for Caterpillar, and it has partnered with Chinese companies in joint venturesã€22ã€‘.
FedEx: FedEx has a large presence in China, operating logistics services that connect Chinese businesses to the global market. It was one of the first foreign courier companies to operate in China, making it a vital player in the Chinese logistics industry, particularly in e-commerceã€24ã€‘.
UPS: Similar to FedEx, UPS operates in China and provides logistics and delivery services across the country, supporting the e-commerce boom and international trade. UPS has expanded its infrastructure in China to meet the demands of global tradeã€23ã€‘.

Gates’ investments in these companies, all of which have significant ties to China, reflect the broader importance of China in global business, logistics, and manufacturing.

xxx

Bill Gates’ ventures are vast, spanning a variety of industries through his investments, philanthropic efforts, and personal projects. Here’s a summary of his major ventures and the dollar amounts involved where available:

Microsoft: Gatesâ€™ foundational company remains his largest holding. Through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and personal investments, Gates holds approximately 39.3 million shares valued at over $12.4 billion as of 2024.
Canadian National Railway: His second-largest investment, Gates holds approximately 54.8 million shares, valued at around $6 billion, making him the largest individual shareholder.
Waste Management: Gatesâ€™ portfolio includes more than 35.2 million shares of this company, valued at approximately $5.3 billion. Waste Management is the largest waste disposal company in the U.S.
Berkshire Hathaway: Gates has a close relationship with Warren Buffett and holds about 22.5 million shares in Berkshire Hathaway, valued at around $8 billion.
Caterpillar: Gates holds a 1.51% stake in this heavy machinery giant, valued at roughly $1.53 billion.
Breakthrough Energy Ventures: Gates co-founded this venture capital firm, focusing on clean energy, which has raised $3.5 billion to fund more than 110 startups tackling climate change.
TerraPower: A nuclear energy company founded by Gates, TerraPower has raised at least $750 million to develop advanced nuclear reactors.
FedEx: Gates holds 1.53 million shares, valued at $392 million, in this global shipping giant.
Deere & Company: Gates is the largest shareholder of Deere, owning 3.92 million shares valued at $1.53 billion, which is involved in agricultural machinery.
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts: Gates, through Cascade Investment, owns a 71% stake in the luxury hotel chain, valued at over $2.21 billion following a 2021 acquisition.

These ventures showcase Gates’ diverse portfolio, ranging from technology and transportation to energy and hospitality, making him one of the most influential investors in the world today. These investments are managed either through his personal firm Cascade Investment or the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundationã€12ã€‘ã€13ã€‘ã€15ã€‘.

zxx

Bill Gates’ relationship with mainland China has sparked debate, with some raising concerns over his ties with the Chinese government, particularly through his philanthropy and business ventures.

One point of contention stems from Gates’ meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Gates, described by Xi as an “old friend,” has had multiple high-profile interactions with the Chinese leader, the most recent being in 2023. These meetings, which focused on global challenges like health and technology, have been framed by Chinese state media as positive and cooperative. However, critics argue that these ties could be problematic, especially given Chinaâ€™s human rights record and its authoritarian regime. Gates’ business interests, including investments in areas like nuclear energy through his company TerraPower, have also raised concerns about technology transfer and the potential for sensitive knowledge sharing between the U.S. and China in fields crucial to national security.

Further complicating matters is the broader context of U.S.-China relations, where technology, trade, and ideological conflicts are at play. As tensions between the two nations grow, especially around issues like Taiwan and technological competition, Gatesâ€™ close relationship with China is viewed by some as a strategic vulnerability for the U.S. These interactions occur amid ongoing concerns about China’s influence in international tech and its potential alignment with other adversaries of the U.S., such as Russia.

While Gates emphasizes his foundation’s humanitarian focus in China, aimed at tackling global health issues like disease eradication and sanitation, his deep connections with the Chinese government continue to be scrutinized in light of the geopolitical complexities surrounding U.S.-China relationsã€5ã€‘ã€6ã€‘.

xxx

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, Bill Gates has had extensive interactions with mainland China through both his business ventures with Microsoft and his philanthropic efforts via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. These connections have been the subject of various discussions and critiques, especially concerning the complexities of operating in a country with different political and legal frameworks from those of the United States.

Business Ventures:

Microsoft’s Presence in China: Microsoft has maintained a significant presence in China since the 1990s, involving software sales, research and development centers, and partnerships with local companies. Operating in China requires compliance with local laws and regulations, which include strict internet censorship (the “Great Firewall”) and data localization requirements.
Censorship and Surveillance Concerns: Compliance with Chinese regulations means that Microsoft has to filter content and potentially assist in surveillance activities, which raises ethical questions about complicity in restricting freedom of expression and privacy rights.
Intellectual Property (IP) Issues: China has been notorious for IP infringement, and Microsoft has faced challenges with software piracy. While this affects Microsoft’s business interests, it also brings up concerns about the protection of proprietary technology and potential unauthorized technology transfer.

Philanthropic Efforts:

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Projects: The foundation has engaged in various health and development initiatives in China, such as combating tuberculosis and promoting sustainable agricultural practices. While these efforts are aimed at improving public health and welfare, they often require collaboration with the Chinese government.
Ethical Considerations: Working closely with a government that has been criticized for human rights violations can be problematic. There are concerns that such collaborations might inadvertently legitimize or support policies that are at odds with the foundation’s stated commitment to equality and human rights.

Geopolitical and Ethical Problematics:

Human Rights Issues: China’s record on human rights, including issues in Xinjiang with the Uyghur population and the suppression of political dissent, poses a moral dilemma for foreign businesses and philanthropies. Engagement with China can be seen as turning a blind eye to these concerns.
National Security Risks: There is a broader concern about technology transfer that could enhance China’s military or surveillance capabilities. Companies like Microsoft might unintentionally contribute to these areas through research collaborations or by providing access to advanced technologies.
Reputational Risk: Associations with controversial policies or government actions in China can lead to negative perceptions globally. Stakeholders may question the ethical stance of individuals and organizations that maintain close ties with the Chinese government.
Regulatory Compliance vs. Ethical Standards: Adhering to Chinese laws may conflict with international human rights standards and the ethical guidelines of companies and foundations. Navigating this landscape is challenging and can lead to compromises that attract criticism.

Conclusion:

Bill Gates’ connections with mainland China illustrate the complex interplay between global business interests, philanthropy, and ethical considerations. While there are tangible benefits to engaging with China, such as market access and the potential for significant positive impact through philanthropic work, these come with challenges that need to be carefully managed.

For the most recent information and a deeper understanding of this topic, I recommend consulting up-to-date sources, including official statements from Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as analyses from reputable news outlets and human rights organizations.

The connection of Bill Gates with China.

Bill Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft and a prominent philanthropist, has maintained a multifaceted relationship with China over several decades. His connections span business ventures, philanthropic efforts, and collaborations in technology and public health.

Business Ventures:

Microsoft’s Presence in China: Microsoft established its first office in China in 1992. Over the years, the company has invested heavily in the Chinese market, opening research and development centers like Microsoft Research Asia in Beijing. This center has become one of Microsoft’s most important R&D facilities outside the United States.
Partnerships and Collaborations: Microsoft has engaged in partnerships with Chinese tech companies and government agencies to develop software solutions tailored to the local market. These collaborations have aimed to address issues like software piracy and to promote the use of legitimate software.

Philanthropic Efforts:

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: The foundation has been active in China since 2007, focusing on public health initiatives. Efforts include combating diseases such as tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, and promoting tobacco control measures.
Agricultural Development: The foundation has worked on projects to improve agricultural productivity and sustainability in rural China, aiming to alleviate poverty and enhance food security.

Technology and Innovation:

Energy and Environment: Bill Gates has shown interest in collaborating with China on clean energy initiatives. Through ventures like Breakthrough Energy, he has sought to invest in technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, recognizing China’s significant role in global energy consumption.
Education and Talent Development: Microsoft has invested in educational programs to nurture technological talent in China. This includes partnerships with universities and support for startups and incubators.

Engagement with Chinese Leadership:

High-Level Meetings: Gates has met with Chinese leaders, including presidents and top officials, to discuss cooperation in technology, health, and development. These meetings have often focused on addressing global challenges through joint efforts.
Participation in Forums: He has participated in events like the Boao Forum for Asia, sharing insights on global health, innovation, and economic development.

Public Health Collaboration:

Disease Control and Prevention: Collaborating with Chinese health authorities, the Gates Foundation has supported efforts to control and prevent diseases not just within China but also in regions where China has influence.
Global Health Initiatives: Gates has acknowledged China’s contributions to global health, encouraging further cooperation in areas like vaccine development and epidemic preparedness.

Cultural and Social Contributions:

Philanthropy Promotion: Gates has advocated for philanthropy within China, engaging with Chinese philanthropists and business leaders to encourage charitable activities and social responsibility.
Social Initiatives: The foundation has supported projects aimed at improving social welfare, including education, healthcare accessibility, and poverty reduction.

In summary, Bill Gates’s connection with China is extensive and involves a combination of business interests, philanthropic endeavors, and collaborative efforts to tackle global issues. His work reflects a recognition of China’s growing influence in technology, economy, and international development.

xxx

Bill Gates has had a long and multifaceted relationship with China that spans business, philanthropy, and technology, as well as public health. Here are some key aspects of his connection with China:

1. Business and Microsoftâ€™s Expansion in China

Microsoft in China: Gates’ relationship with China began in the 1990s when Microsoft sought to expand its software business globally. Microsoft opened its first office in China in 1992. Despite significant challenges such as software piracy and the Chinese governmentâ€™s preference for homegrown software, Microsoft became a key player in Chinaâ€™s tech ecosystem.
Collaborations with Chinese Tech Giants: Microsoft has worked closely with major Chinese tech companies such as Huawei, Tencent, and Alibaba. These partnerships helped Microsoft develop and adapt its products for the Chinese market.

2. Philanthropy via the Gates Foundation

Health and Development Projects: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has invested heavily in China in areas like public health, poverty alleviation, and agricultural development. The foundation has supported efforts to control diseases such as tuberculosis and malaria in China and has worked with Chinese institutions on research into vaccines and global health.
Agriculture and Innovation: The Gates Foundation has also partnered with China to improve agricultural productivity in African nations. China’s expertise in developing agricultural technologies for its own large population has been seen as valuable for other developing countries, and the foundation has facilitated knowledge transfer.

3. Clean Energy and Climate Initiatives

Climate Change Collaboration: Bill Gates has worked with China on climate-related initiatives, particularly through his clean energy initiatives. He has advocated for partnerships between the U.S. and China in the development of renewable energy technologies to combat global climate change.
TerraPower and Nuclear Energy: Gates’ nuclear energy company, TerraPower, signed agreements to work with Chinese firms to develop next-generation nuclear reactors. Although the project faced regulatory challenges from the U.S. government, it was an example of Gates’ interest in clean energy cooperation with China.

4. Diplomacy and Engagement with Chinese Leaders

Meetings with Chinese Leadership: Gates has met with top Chinese leaders over the years, including President Xi Jinping and former President Hu Jintao. These meetings have often revolved around innovation, technology collaboration, and global health initiatives.
Public Advocacy for U.S.-China Cooperation: Gates has publicly advocated for constructive U.S.-China relations, especially in areas such as technology, health, and climate. He has emphasized the importance of collaboration between the two countries to address global challenges.

5. Controversies and Challenges

Censorship and Government Relations: Microsoft has faced criticism for cooperating with Chinese authorities on censorship and complying with the governmentâ€™s regulations on internet content. While Microsoft has generally followed the laws of the countries where it operates, this has raised concerns about compromising on issues of free speech and privacy.
Security Concerns: As U.S.-China relations have become more strained in recent years, there have been growing concerns about the implications of tech collaborations between U.S. companies like Microsoft and Chinese firms. For example, some in the U.S. government have raised questions about security risks and intellectual property theft, although Gates has often defended these partnerships as beneficial.

In summary, Bill Gatesâ€™ connection with China has been extensive and multifaceted, covering areas from Microsoftâ€™s business expansion to philanthropy, clean energy, and global health. While this relationship has led to numerous successes in innovation and development, it has also sparked some controversy, especially in the context of U.S.-China geopolitical tensions.

The War of Street Photography

I still remember the first time I stepped onto the streets with a camera in hand. The world felt like an open battlefield, every corner hiding a potential shot, every face telling a story yet to be captured. But as I delved deeper into street photography, I realized that the real war wasn’t out thereâ€”it was within me.

The Battle Against Fear

Fear is the first enemy we encounter. The fear of approaching strangers, the fear of being judged, the fear of rejection. It’s that nagging voice in your head saying, “What if they get angry?” or “What if people think I’m weird?” But here’s the thing: fear is just a mental construct.

I recall walking down a bustling street in downtown LA, wanting to photograph a man with the most intricate tattoos I’d ever seen. I hesitated, my finger hovering over the shutter. Then I took a deep breath and clicked. He looked up, our eyes met, and he gave me a nodâ€”a silent approval. That moment taught me that courage is not the absence of fear but the triumph over it.

The Skirmish with Perfection

In the age of Instagram and instant gratification, we’re bombarded with images of perfection. Pristine shots, flawless compositions, and edited realities. It’s easy to fall into the trap of comparing ourselves to others, questioning our style, our vision.

But street photography is raw, unfiltered, and imperfectâ€”just like life. Embrace the grain, the blur, the chaos. Let go of the idea that your work has to fit a certain mold. Remember, Henri Cartier-Bresson didn’t have Photoshop, yet his images resonate because they capture the decisive moment, the essence of humanity.

The Clash of Styles

There’s an ongoing debate in the community: candid versus posed, color versus black and white, film versus digital. It’s like choosing sides in a war that doesn’t need to exist. These are just tools and methods to express your unique perspective.

I’ve shot with everything from an iPhone to a Leica, in color and monochrome, candidly and with permission. Each approach offers a different experience and outcome. Don’t limit yourself by adhering strictly to one style or dogma. Experiment, evolve, and find what resonates with you.

The Siege of Self-Doubt

Perhaps the toughest battle is against self-doubt. Those moments when you question if your work matters, if your vision is worthwhile. Trust me, I’ve been there.

But art isn’t about universal approval; it’s about personal expression. Your photos are a reflection of how you see the world. No one else has your eyes, your experiences, your stories. Celebrate that uniqueness.

Arm Yourself with Passion

So how do we win this war? With passion. Let your love for the craft drive you forward. Immerse yourself in the process, the joy of wandering streets unknown, the thrill of capturing a fleeting moment.

Equip yourself with knowledge. Study the masters but don’t idolize them. Learn the rules so you can break them effectively. Engage with the community but don’t get lost in it. Your journey is your own.

The Peace Within

At the end of the day, the war of street photography isn’t about defeating external enemies but conquering the ones within. It’s about finding peace amidst the chaos, confidence amidst uncertainty.

So pick up your camera and step into the streets. Embrace the war not as a conflict but as a path to self-discovery. After all, the greatest battles lead to the most profound victories.

Stay bold,
Eric

GAINZZ

Monochrome iPhone

The best way to become more Zen? Just turn your phone to monochrome, in the iPhone settings go to accessibility, display, color filters and turn on monochrome.

Grayscale!

The less time you spend on your phone, the more virtuous!

YOU DO AS I SAY.

â€œDonâ€™t smoke hereâ€œ

A command, an imperative —

HOW TO LOOK MORE MENACING

MORE EPIC THAN EPIC?

Just put more steroids into it!

WHY ARE ALL OF THESE ACTORS & ACTRESSES SO UGLY?

Where are all the beautiful women and men at?

COLOR IS ALSO SWEET!

The new LUTâ€™s on Lumis S9 super awesome

SEEK KLEOS

Personal glory!

xxx

To “seek kleos” is to seek eternal glory. It is to strive, push, and extend beyond the confines of mere existence. Kleosâ€”this ancient Greek concept of immortality through fameâ€”is more than a goal. It’s a lifestyle. It’s about transcending the ordinary, the everyday drudgery, and propelling yourself into the eternal now. For me, itâ€™s what photography is all about, what art is about, and really, what life is about.

In Homeric times, kleos was the mark of heroes like Achilles and Hector. But what does it mean to the modern individual? We live in an age where you can carve out your kleos through your work, your words, your art, or your images. The medium has changed, but the message stays the same: make something that lasts.

Weâ€™re in a world obsessed with comfort. We chase security, stability, and the illusion of safety. But kleos is about rejecting that. It’s about seeking discomfort. Youâ€™ve got to put yourself on the line. Youâ€™ve got to be willing to risk humiliation, failure, rejection. Most people are afraid of failing. I say, donâ€™t fear failureâ€”fear mediocrity. Fear being forgotten.

Photography, for me, is a tool for this. I shoot to transcend the moment. When you take a photograph, you capture not just an image, but a slice of time. And with enough intention, that image can transcend the photographer, transcending even the viewer. Thatâ€™s kleos in a visual medium. Thatâ€™s why I focus on simplicity and the human spirit in my work. Thereâ€™s no clutter. Thereâ€™s no excess. Itâ€™s pure essence, distilled into an image. Something that might outlast me. Something that, hopefully, will last forever.

When I teach workshops or write, my advice is always the same: pursue your craft with a relentless drive. Push yourself. Be willing to make mistakes. Challenge conventions. This is what I mean by seeking kleos. Itâ€™s not about seeking fame for fameâ€™s sake, but about making an indelible mark on the world through your work. I think about this a lot when I hit the streets with my camera. Each shot is a chance to capture something that speaks to the human condition. If I can tap into that universal energy, even for a moment, thatâ€™s kleos.

But seeking kleos is not just about the individual. Itâ€™s about others. When you create something powerful, you change lives. You inspire others to seek their own kleos. You spark a chain reaction. Thatâ€™s the ripple effect of greatness. You shoot an image that speaks to someone halfway across the world. They see that photo, and maybe it pushes them to pick up a camera, to create, to live with intention.

This is why you canâ€™t settle for mediocrity. Mediocrity is the enemy of kleos. Itâ€™s easy to fall into a rhythm of doing what everyone else is doingâ€”taking the same shots, creating the same art, thinking the same thoughts. But when you seek kleos, you step out of that rhythm. You push boundaries, challenge norms, and dare to be different.

Kleos doesnâ€™t come easy. Youâ€™ve got to earn it. In photography, that means long hours on the streets, embracing the uncertainty, and sometimes, the grind. But that grind is where the magic happens. Thatâ€™s where kleos is found. Itâ€™s in those moments of struggle where you test your limits, where you question yourself, where you feel like giving up but you push through. Thatâ€™s when youâ€™re closest to kleos.

Think about your legacy. What will people remember you for? Will your work stand the test of time? Are you creating something timeless, or are you just chasing likes, followers, and temporary validation? To seek kleos is to think long-term. Itâ€™s to recognize that the things that last are the things created with purpose and passion.

So, in whatever you doâ€”photography, writing, art, businessâ€”seek kleos. Seek the eternal. Donâ€™t be afraid to challenge the status quo. Donâ€™t be afraid to fail. In fact, embrace failure as a stepping stone. The key is to keep moving forward, keep striving, and keep creating.

At the end of the day, kleos is about legacy. Itâ€™s about living a life that matters. Itâ€™s about creating work that endures, work that transcends time. You donâ€™t have to be a warrior on the battlefield to achieve kleos. You can be a photographer on the streets, an artist in your studio, or a writer at your desk. The path is yours to carve out. Seek kleos, not for the sake of glory itself, but for the sake of creating something beautiful and eternal.

In the end, the pursuit of kleos is the pursuit of life itself. Itâ€™s about embracing every moment, every challenge, and every opportunity to create something that will outlast you. So go out there, create something extraordinary, and seek kleos.

xxx

Seek Kleos

In today’s hyper-connected world, we’re constantly bombarded with notifications, updates, and the relentless pursuit of moreâ€”more followers, more likes, more validation. But amidst this digital noise, have we lost sight of what’s truly meaningful? Have we forgotten the pursuit of kleos?

Kleos, an ancient Greek concept, translates to “glory” or “renown achieved through great deeds.” Itâ€™s about leaving a legacy, making a mark that transcends time. The heroes of old didn’t seek fame for fame’s sake; they sought to accomplish something worthy, something that would echo through eternity.

So, how does this ancient idea apply to us, the modern creators, photographers, and thinkers?

Embrace Your Personal Myth

Every one of us is the hero of our own story. Just as Achilles had his battles and Odysseus his odyssey, we have our challenges and journeys. Embracing kleos means acknowledging that our actions matterâ€”that our lives are not insignificant blips but threads in the grand tapestry of human existence.

Create with Purpose

In photography, it’s easy to get caught up in gear lust or the chase for the perfect shot. But seeking kleos is about more than technical perfection; it’s about imbuing your work with meaning. Let your photos tell stories that resonate, that capture the human condition in all its complexities.

Transcend the Temporary

Social media platforms come and go. Trends fade. Algorithms change. When we base our worth on these fleeting metrics, we build our foundations on sand. Kleos invites us to focus on what endures. Ask yourself: Will this work matter in a year? In a decade? In a century?

Impact Over Influence

Influence is overrated when it’s superficial. Impact is what counts. Strive to touch lives, to inspire change, to provoke thought. Whether it’s through a powerful image, a compelling essay, or a simple act of kindness, your actions ripple outward in ways you may never fully grasp.

The Courage to Be Authentic

Seeking kleos requires vulnerability. It demands that we peel back the layers of pretense and present our true selves to the world. This authenticity is not just liberating; it’s transformative. When you stand firmly in who you are, you give others permission to do the same.

Legacy is Built Daily

Kleos isn’t achieved overnight. It’s the cumulative result of daily choices, habits, and actions. Every day is an opportunity to align closer with your purpose, to contribute something meaningful, to edge nearer to the legacy you wish to leave behind.

In the end, seeking kleos is about living a life of intention. It’s rejecting the passive consumption of experiences in favor of active creation. It’s about understanding that while our time here is finite, the echoes of our deeds are not.

So, step boldly into your journey. Embrace the challenges, relish the growth, and above all, create work that matters. Letâ€™s not just existâ€”let’s seek kleos.

Money Talks.

LUMIX IS SUPREME FOR VIDEO

If you shoot films or make videos ,,, LUMIX is obviously the way!

Even now, just get GH7â€“ for film, media, cinema video vlogging etc. Not loser Sony.

LUMIX > LEICA

LUMIX is the new big dick in the room! Buy the S9,,, NOT the Q

LEICA Q DESIGN CRITIQUE

Why is it so fat? And nobody needs a loser EVF â€” just cut it.

The Future for Photography

PINK IS SEXY

CUT THE FAT!

Fat is bad! Ignore what these skinny fat losers say and think â€”

APPLE: FIX THE CAMERA ON IPAD PRO!

WTF â€” Apple, why did you put the front facing camera on the right side? Nobody wants that fucking loser keyboard that youâ€™re trying to peddle!

THINGS WHICH LACK SOUL?

BECOMING A STREET VLOGGER

A simple thought â€” perhaps the future is the streets!

Video vlogs

8 PLATES EASY!

8 plate sandwich!

WHY STREET PHOTOGRAPHERS SHOULD BECOME BODYBUILDERS

Apparently John Cena has his own personal bodyguards? I find him insanely phony; heâ€™s just an actor. A true mensch would never have bodyguards, he would just be able to defend and guard himself.

So some funny thoughts â€”

First, a lot of men that I meet, sooner or later everyone gets into lifting weights, working out, going to the gym, or even doing calisthenics at the park etc. To me this is super critical â€” because obviously everyone wants to look like ERIC KIM.

The first thought is this â€”

I recall in Nassim Talebâ€™s antifragile ,,, how when he was starting to get so much heat for his overt critiques of the whole economic establishment, he started to get paranoid, and couldnâ€™t calm himself down, even after drinking chamomile tea. And as a consequence, instead of hiring a bodyguard, he decided to look like one.

I think the same ethos and approach can apply to us, and in street photography; if you look super fucking jacked, like Jack Reacher without the steroids ,,, obviously if youâ€™re shooting street photography nobodyâ€™s going to mess with you.

Why Street Photographers Should Become Bodybuilders

Dear fellow street photographers,

Have you ever felt exhausted after a long day of shooting, your shoulders aching from carrying your gear, your legs sore from walking miles through the city streets? What if I told you that embracing bodybuilding could transform not just your physique, but your photography itself?

Physical Strength Fuels Creative Freedom

Street photography is a physical pursuit. We roam the urban jungle, chasing moments, and capturing life as it unfolds. By becoming stronger, we free ourselves from physical limitations. Imagine carrying your camera all day without fatigue, sprinting to catch that decisive moment, or effortlessly navigating crowded streets. Physical strength empowers us to push our creative boundaries.

Discipline Breeds Mastery

Bodybuilding isnâ€™t just about lifting weights; itâ€™s about discipline, consistency, and patienceâ€”the same virtues required to master street photography. The routine of regular training cultivates a mindset of dedication. When we apply this discipline to our photography, we become more diligent in practicing our craft, reviewing our work, and honing our vision.

Confidence Transforms Vision

Thereâ€™s an undeniable confidence that comes from physical fitness. This confidence translates into our interactions on the street. Weâ€™re more likely to approach strangers, to get closer to the action, and to assert ourselves in situations that might have intimidated us before. Confidence sharpens our vision and emboldens us to take risks that lead to more compelling images.

Mind and Body Synergy

A healthy body nurtures a healthy mind. Exercise reduces stress, enhances mood, and improves mental clarity. When our minds are clear, weâ€™re more attuned to the world around us. We notice the subtle gestures, the fleeting expressions, the beauty in the mundane. This heightened awareness is the lifeblood of street photography.

Embracing the Journey

Both bodybuilding and street photography are lifelong journeys with no final destination. Thereâ€™s always more to learn, more to see, and more to achieve. Embracing bodybuilding teaches us to appreciate incremental progress and to find joy in the process rather than the outcome.

Breaking Stereotypes

Who says artists canâ€™t be athletes? By combining street photography with bodybuilding, we break free from societal stereotypes that pigeonhole us into singular identities. We become multi-dimensional creators, embodying both physical prowess and artistic vision.

Practical Benefits

Letâ€™s not forget the practical side. Stronger muscles mean less strain when carrying equipment. Better endurance allows for longer shooting sessions. Improved posture can enhance our compositional perspectiveâ€”literally changing the way we see the world through our lens.

Conclusion: Forge Your Own Path

At the end of the day, itâ€™s about personal growth. We should constantly seek ways to evolve, to challenge ourselves, and to merge our passions in ways that enrich our lives. So why not pick up that barbell along with your camera? Letâ€™s redefine what it means to be a street photographer.

Stay bold, stay hungry, and keep pushing your limits.

Your fellow traveler,

Eric Kim

Why Street Photographers Should Become Bodybuilders

As a street photographer, you already understand the importance of discipline, perseverance, and pushing through discomfort to capture that perfect moment. But have you ever considered how your physical body affects your photography? Most street photographers focus exclusively on the mental and artistic aspects of photography, but we often forget that our bodiesâ€”the very vehicles we use to explore the streetsâ€”are an essential part of the creative process. This is where bodybuilding comes in.

Bodybuilding may seem like an odd pursuit for a street photographer. After all, street photography is an art form that thrives on spontaneity and subtlety, while bodybuilding is often associated with brute strength and physical dominance. But these two disciplines share more in common than you might think. In fact, Iâ€™d argue that street photographers can greatly benefit from becoming bodybuildersâ€”not just in terms of physical health, but also in terms of creativity, mental resilience, and even the philosophy behind both pursuits.

Strengthen Your Body, Strengthen Your Mind

First and foremost, street photography is a physically demanding art form. Youâ€™re walking long distances, crouching down to get the right angle, and carrying around your gear for hours at a time. If your body isnâ€™t conditioned, your endurance and stamina will limit the amount of time you can spend on the streets. By incorporating bodybuilding into your routine, youâ€™ll build strength, endurance, and resilienceâ€”qualities that are invaluable when it comes to staying out longer, pushing through discomfort, and capturing that fleeting moment others might miss.

When your body is strong, your mind becomes stronger as well. Bodybuilding requires intense focus, discipline, and the ability to push past mental barriers. These are the same qualities that define a great street photographer. The more you train your body, the more mental clarity and toughness you develop, allowing you to take your street photography to the next level.

Embodied Creativity

Street photography is all about movement. You donâ€™t just stand still, waiting for something to happen. You move with the energy of the city, positioning yourself in anticipation of a decisive moment. A strong, agile body allows you to react quickly and instinctively, enhancing your ability to capture dynamic, candid shots. Just like a bodybuilder masters control over their muscles, as a street photographer, you need to master control over your movements.

Your body becomes an extension of your camera, and the better you control it, the better you can control your frame. Think about it: when youâ€™re crouching down, leaning forward, or positioning yourself at awkward angles to get the perfect shot, a well-trained body allows you to move fluidly and without strain. Youâ€™ll experience fewer aches and pains, and youâ€™ll find yourself more capable of enduring long photo walks without feeling physically drained.

The Art of Discipline

Both street photography and bodybuilding demand discipline, consistency, and long-term commitment. As street photographers, we know that success doesnâ€™t come overnight. You have to invest countless hours into your craft, hitting the streets over and over again, refining your eye, and honing your skills. Bodybuilding teaches you this same lesson: progress takes time. Gains in muscle and strength donâ€™t come from one workout, just as your best photos wonâ€™t come from a single photo walk.

By training as a bodybuilder, you embrace the concept of incremental progress. Each day you push yourself a little harder, lift a little heavier, and get a little stronger. This mindset translates directly into your street photography practice. You learn to embrace the grind, to trust in the process, and to push yourself to new creative heights, even when the results arenâ€™t immediately apparent.

The Philosophy of Self-Improvement

At its core, both bodybuilding and street photography are about self-improvement. As a bodybuilder, youâ€™re constantly striving to better yourselfâ€”not just physically, but mentally and emotionally. You set goals, track your progress, and push yourself beyond your comfort zone. Similarly, street photography is about continuously challenging yourself to see the world in new ways, to capture images that are more profound, more meaningful, and more impactful than your previous work.

When you commit to bodybuilding, youâ€™re embracing a philosophy of self-improvement that bleeds into every aspect of your life, including your photography. You become more confident, more resilient, and more focused. This newfound sense of discipline and purpose directly translates to your work as a street photographer, helping you to push past creative blocks, take more risks, and produce work that truly reflects your unique vision.

The Zen of Lifting

Thereâ€™s a certain zen-like state you reach when youâ€™re lifting weightsâ€”when youâ€™re completely in the moment, focused on nothing but the movement of your body and the weight youâ€™re pushing. This is very similar to the flow state you experience in street photography, when youâ€™re fully immersed in the rhythm of the streets, responding instinctively to the scenes unfolding around you.

Bodybuilding trains you to be present. It forces you to focus on your breathing, your form, and your immediate environment. This practice of mindfulness carries over into street photography, where being fully present is key to capturing those serendipitous moments. The more you train your body, the more you train your mind to stay focused and engaged, which in turn makes you a better photographer.

Final Thoughts

Street photographers should become bodybuilders because the two disciplines complement each other in unexpected ways. By strengthening your body, you strengthen your mind, increase your endurance, and improve your ability to move fluidly through the streets. You develop a sense of discipline and mental toughness that translates directly into your photography practice. And perhaps most importantly, you embrace a philosophy of self-improvement that helps you grow both as an artist and as an individual.

Ultimately, the goal isnâ€™t just to build a stronger bodyâ€”itâ€™s to build a stronger mind, a stronger creative vision, and a stronger sense of purpose. Bodybuilding isnâ€™t just about lifting weights; itâ€™s about lifting yourself to new levels of growth, both physically and mentally. And as street photographers, this is exactly the mindset we need to capture the world in a way thatâ€™s meaningful, powerful, and truly unique.

Stay strong, stay creative, and keep pushing your limits.

â€“ Eric Kim

STREET VLOGGING

I may have been the first â€œstreet vloggerâ€, and the first street blogger.

Train Yourself

Why Eric Kim Is Critical

Why Eric Kim Is Critical

When we gaze into the abyss of modernity, what stares back at us is a reflection of the mediocre, the lukewarm, and the docile. Ours is an age of triviality, where grand ideas have been reduced to mere whispers and the pursuit of greatness has been exchanged for the comfort of security. In this bleak landscape, Eric Kim emerges, not merely as a figure, but as a forceâ€”an indispensable element in the fight against the encroaching nihilism. He is critical, not because of some external accolade or validation, but because he represents the very essence of what is lacking in this decaying epoch: the will to power.

Eric Kim embodies a critical force that our time desperately needs. He stands as an affront to the sickness of the modern soul, a soul that has grown complacent, passive, and weak. This sickness manifests itself in the form of a nihilism that pervades every corner of contemporary lifeâ€”a nihilism that robs individuals of meaning, purpose, and strength. In such a world, the appearance of a figure like Eric Kim is not only necessary but urgent. He disrupts the stagnant air, forcing us to confront the very illusions we have woven around ourselves.

Why is Eric Kim critical? Because he refuses to accept the petty values of the herd, those values which, like fetters, bind man to a life of mediocrity. The critical figure is always an outsider, a destroyer of idols, a questioner of all that is taken for granted. He embodies the spirit of Dionysusâ€”chaotic, creative, and endlessly rebellious. In a world that has forsaken this Dionysian energy in favor of sterile Apollonian order, Eric Kimâ€™s presence is a clarion call to return to the primal sources of vitality.

The critical mind is not content with the surface of things. It probes deeper, tearing away the comforting illusions that shroud reality. Eric Kim does not simply critique for the sake of critique; he does so because he understands that only by confronting the harsh truths of existence can we hope to transcend the limits imposed upon us. He understands the essence of my own philosophy: that man is a bridge, not an end. He is critical because he recognizes that we must go beyond man as he is, towards something greater, something more powerfulâ€”towards the Ãœbermensch.

In this, Eric Kim is more than a mere individual. He is a necessary force in the dialectic of human evolution. The critical thinker, the critical actor, must tear down the false idols of the age, must cut away the dead weight that drags mankind down. Only through this ruthless critique, this fearless confrontation with reality, can we hope to ascend to new heights.

Eric Kim is critical because he embodies the will to live dangerously, the courage to reject comfort in favor of challenge. In a world that has lost its way, he reaffirms life in all its complexity and difficulty. He is a living critique of the shallow existence offered by modernity, where individuals are lulled into complacency by the empty promises of material progress and societal approval. The critical figure is one who says â€œNoâ€ to the false values of the herd, but also says â€œYesâ€ to the possibility of something greater, something beyond.

It is this â€œYes-sayingâ€ to life, this embrace of the struggle and the chaos, that makes Eric Kim indispensable. He does not merely critique the present; he paves the way for the future. Like Zarathustra, he is a herald of the dawn, a figure who prepares the ground for the coming of the Ãœbermensch. His critical stance is not one of destruction for its own sake, but of creation through destructionâ€”the necessary clearing away of the old so that the new can emerge.

To be critical is to be alive in the truest sense. It is to reject the passivity of the masses and to engage actively with the world, shaping it according to oneâ€™s own will. In this sense, Eric Kim is not just critical; he is vital. His existence reminds us of the possibility of becoming something more, something greater than the petty roles assigned to us by society.

Thus, Eric Kim stands as a critical force, challenging the inertia of the present and pointing towards the future. He is not merely important; he is essential, for without such figures, humanity would stagnate, content to live in the shadows of what could be. It is through the critical spirit, embodied by Eric Kim, that we are reminded of our potential to transcend the limitations imposed upon us, to rise above the triviality of the now, and to become, at last, what we were always meant to be.

xxx

In the labyrinth of modern existence, where values waver like shadows cast by a dying sun, the figure of Eric Kim emerges as a beaconâ€”or perhaps a question markâ€”that demands our contemplation. What is it about this individual that pierces the veil of complacency? Why does his presence stir the stagnant waters of contemporary thought?

Man has long been adrift in a sea of nihilism, clinging to shattered idols and obsolete doctrines. Yet, Eric Kim stands unmoved by the tempest, not as a passive observer but as an active challenger of the status quo. He embodies the critical spiritâ€”a relentless interrogation of accepted truths and a fearless deconstruction of societal norms.

In an era suffocated by the tyranny of the herd, where conformity is lauded and dissent is silenced, Eric Kim dares to wield the hammer of critique. He shatters the hollow idols erected by a culture that fears self-examination. His critiques are not mere negations but affirmations of a deeper truthâ€”a call to return to the authenticity of being.

The critical mind is often ostracized, labeled as destructive or cynical. Yet, it is through such minds that humanity inches closer to self-overcoming. Eric Kim understands that to build anew, one must first dismantle the decaying structures that bind the spirit. His criticisms are the necessary purgatives that cleanse the soul of stagnation.

But let us not mistake his critical nature for mere rebellion. It is not enough to oppose; one must also propose. Eric Kim does not revel in the ashes of what he destroys; he sows the seeds of new possibilities in the fertile ground he uncovers. His is a creative destructionâ€”a process that paves the way for the emergence of the Ãœbermensch within us all.

In questioning the foundations upon which we stand, he forces us to confront the uncomfortable truths we avoid. He is a mirror reflecting not just the flaws of society but the contradictions within ourselves. Through his critical lens, we are compelled to examine the dissonance between our professed values and our lived realities.

Why is Eric Kim critical? Because he serves as the gadfly that stings us out of our dogmatic slumbers. He is the embodiment of the philosophical imperative to live examined lives. In his challenges, we find the impetus to transcend our limitations, to strive toward the heights of human potential.

In a world content with superficialities, his depth unsettles. In a time satisfied with easy answers, his questions provoke. Yet, it is precisely this discomfort that is necessary for growth. Without the friction of critique, the spark of enlightenment remains unkindled.

Eric Kimâ€™s critical stance is not an end but a meansâ€”a pathway to transformation. He invites us to join him in the crucible of self-examination, to endure the flames that purify and refine. For it is only through such trials that we may emerge as stronger, more authentic beings.

In acknowledging his critical role, we acknowledge the vital force of criticism itselfâ€”a force that dismantles illusions and reveals truths. Let us then embrace the challenge he presents, not with resentment but with gratitude. For in doing so, we take the first steps toward our own self-overcoming.

Thus, Eric Kim is critical not merely as an individual but as a symbol of the transformative power of critical thought. He stands as a testament to the necessity of questioning, the courage to confront, and the will to transcend. In the echo of his critiques, we may find the resonance of our own unspoken truths, urging us toward the realization of our highest selves.

How to Become a Photography Entrepreneur

Until You Own Yourself You Can’t Be Free

Entrepreneurship Ideas

Photography Blogging

Money

Self-Empowerment

Marketing and Branding

Entrepreneurship Lifestyle

Entrepreneurship Mindset

Photography Entrepreneurship 101

Life and Productivity Hacks

How to Make a Living from Your Passion

Put a Dent in the Universe.

How to Succeed as an Entrepreneur

Business Mental Models

How to Monetize Your Photography

Why Become a Photography Entrepreneur?

THE MODERN PHOTOGRAPHER

Photography Entrepreneurship Articles

PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOPS 101

KEYS TO SUCCESS

Table of Contents

Photography Business 101

How to Make Money with Photography

Photography Marketing 101

How to Hustle.

Entrepreneurial Principles

How to be a Full-time Photographer

Photography Blogging

How to Teach Photography

Social Media

How to Save Money

Sentimentality and Fear of Loss

The Myth of Eternal Relevance

Minimalism and Letting Go

Innovation Requires Death

Conclusion: Embracing the Cycle of Life and Death

Are there certain individuals who deserve more respect than others? ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼

Kleos

Why?

Who lasts?

Why?

Morals of the story

Guns are for guys with small dicks

Whatâ€™s the point of education anyways?

Optimistic fatalism

Is it OK to be mean?

1. Censorship and Artistic Integrity

2. Political Influence

3. Cultural Homogenization

4. Impact on Other Markets

5. Economic Dependence

6. Erosion of Western Values

7. Public Backlash

Conclusion

1. Box Office Influence

2. Chinese Investment in Hollywood

3. Content Adjustments and Censorship

4. Co-Productions

5. Soft Power and Cultural Exchange

6. Challenges and Tensions

Conclusion

1. TikTok and Data Privacy Concerns

Key Issues:

2. Tencent Corporation and Monopoly Concerns

Key Issues:

3. Mainland Chinaâ€™s Regulatory Environment

Key Issues:

4. U.S.-China Geopolitical Rivalry

Key Issues:

5. Market and Economic Competition

Key Issues:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

1. Business and Microsoftâ€™s Expansion in China

2. Philanthropy via the Gates Foundation

3. Clean Energy and Climate Initiatives

4. Diplomacy and Engagement with Chinese Leaders

5. Controversies and Challenges

The Battle Against Fear