The powerful vs the powerless?

An essay on power;

I think I’ve got it figured out

Niggas playing for power! – JAY Z

Respect Jimmy Iovine ,,, but he got to respect the Elohim it’s a whole new regime! – JAY Z

I almost feel like I could live my whole life off of cording Jay Z, Jay Z rap lyrics etc.

So what I find is very fascinating about both Kanye West and Jay Z, if you think about it, they are by far the most honest ones. Why? If you take any sort of traditional skinny fat loser academic, who watches basketball football professional sports, but hasn’t touched a weight or a barbell in years, don’t get at me.

Also very very funny… A lot of highly esteemed professors, at the elite Ivy League schools and UCS, also listen to Kendrick Lamar in secret?

Anyways, I think I got the whole thing figured out with politics, identity politics, race, sex and gender whatever. Essentially everyone is just trying to vie for power.

For example ,,, I find this really really strange movement with indigenous communities etc. Obviously everyone knows that the American colonist were evil bad, and essentially stole all the Native American land, that they probably raped pillage and killed all the locals, either intentionally or unintentionally with their germs diseases etc. kind of like the whole Jared diamond theory about guns germs and steel… The germs one is one that is often overlooked.

But a thought that always keeps coming up in my mind is… Why does this matter? Who cares?

So obviously… Indigenous people care because they were kind of fucked and screwed over. Yet wasn’t everybody kind of fucked and screwed over somewhere?

Fighting for power

So what happens when all your land has been stolen seized… with no justice?

One side calls for some sort of retribution, of land of money of privileges of power of political power etc. Yet from a macro perspective, I kind of scratch my head it finds me a little bit confusing…

What incentive does America or the American government have in giving back money to indigenous people, or local tribes, besides assuaging a guilty conscience?

To me the notion of a guilty conscience is not a strong enough motivation to give reparations?

Reparations is also debasing?

So let us say that it is a fact that the colonizer came in, killed and raped everybody, stole all the land, did all these terrible things. But to give reparations, it all comes down to money… Isn’t this disrespectful? Like for me… For example if some sort of injustice was done to my family, like the death or murder or something of any of my family members, whether it be my wife my kids my mom my sister etc.… Anyone essentially blood related to me, if somebody cut me $1 trillion check that would not be enough justice. For me it isn’t even a matter of justice, but simply revenge.

I forget which ancient writer which wrote it… But talking about revenge is sweeter than honey, probably true.

In modern day times, justice is essentially a rebranding or a standardization or socialized form of revenge. so for example, for one reason or another we have deemed that it is not OK to commit revenge by killing somebody for killing your best friend, as Achilles did to Hector, for the killing of his best friend Patroclus.

unrequited revenge?

So I have a theory, a lot of the modern-day maladies that we face and suffer, it is simply revenge we desire, but for one reason or another, we cannot commit the revenge?

And this is where the whole powerful versus the week thing happened; when you are weak and powerless, and you cannot commit revenge… Then what do you do? Do you become passive aggressive, you become resentful, which is like drinking Poison and hoping that the other person dies.

But the tricky thing is with revenge… In the case of the Elliot, even after Achilles does get his revenge on Hector, the heart of Achilles is actually not fully settled. Achilles still feels the pain the sorrow of his best friend, and even sleeting the throat of some young Trojan boys who they captured as prisoners, burning the massive funeral pyre for Patroclus, and even debating the body of Hector, by piercing his ankles and running laps around the enemy camp, once again still… The heart of Achilles is not settled.

so what is the moral of the story?

I think most people have the wrong. We often look at this like some sort of Judeo Christian morality, I would not trust any sort of modern day American teacher or thinker or professor to uncover the themes of justice and morality here.

So the typical Jude Christian might say that seeking revenge is not the way because even after Achilles got his revenge, his heart still felt sorrow. And then one might invoke some sort of Jesus mentality here; better to forgive your enemies and turn the other cheek.

Problems with this

Once again, turning the other cheek… My thinking and thought in my unorthodox interpretation, kind of in line with Friedrich Nietzsche, is I wonder… If the tactics the morality the ethics the teachings and thoughts of Jesus of Nazareth was simply because Jesus lacked a physical army? If Jesus of Nazareth, also had some sort of military army, a kin to the prophet Muhammad, would he have approached things differently?

Tactics of the weak

So for example, my theory is the whole turning the other cheek, is simply a tactic of the weak. In Jesus‘s time, to simply try to subvert the authority of those in power at the time was kind of like a pre-eminent death. And therefore turning the other cheek was actually the most effective strategy because you could continue to endure abuse, without being outright killed. For your insolence.

so the question is what is the alternative?

Assuming that Jesus of Nazareth, yes, he was a real historical figure, had the ethics or the morality of an Achilles, how would things have turned out differently?

Tactics of the weak

So I’m starting to really really get into this notion of tactics, tactical etc. For example, I will never forget that one moment in John Wick, in which John Wick is meeting the Somalia, getting suited up etc., and asking what the occasion is blah blah blah, and then when asking what kind of attire or formal where he wanted… John Wick just responded with a single word “tactical.”

So tactics, taktikos,,, to arrange, to order,,, tasso…

So typically we tend to think of tactics like military tactics. And almost all of modern language is derived from the military.

So now the big problem is mostly demilitarized world, how are we allowed to talk about military like things, without actually talking about it?

Armored vehicles

So what I discovered in Los Angeles is that whenever somebody pulls up in some sort of AMG g wagon, some sort of Range Rover, high-powered SUV, cyber truck whatever… Essentially what they want is some sort of armored military vehicle. I kind of get it; driving in LA is like a fucking Warzone, kind of like mad Max. And the truth is here, a lot of the drivers drive without abandoned; I honestly think it is a social economic thing; people from the hood drive very recklessly, both endangering themselves and others. in fact, an interesting observation is that you could tell how good or bad the neighborhood is based on how people drive. And also, you could tell whether somebody’s a local or not, to search the neighborhood because once again, holiday drive, and also the make model of their car etc. 

Least one thing I love about Teslas, is they have all the safety things baked into it. Therefore, I think Tesla cars have it pre-wired and programmed into the car that even if the driver wanted to, even if the driver had malicious intent, they could actually not rear end you, or T-bone you; the car would automatically break before it would happen. Also, when you are merging in traffic or on the freeway, always better to cut in front of a Tesla than any other car because once again… The Tesla will automatically brake and stop itself. 

Waymo

Also a random thought, I think in terms of our mind, we don’t like Waymo cars or self driving cars because we don’t feel in control. But the truth is, a WeMo car is probably 1 trillion times safer than real human drivers, on both sides of the equation.

First, Waymo doesn’t text while driving. Literally being here in Los Angeles, whenever I pee into the driver side door, and stare at the people… They are always looking down at their laps, texting while driving, some of them even having the audacity to drive with phone in hand texting!

---

Back to power

OK back to power;

bitcoin is digital power

Also smaller waist size?

---

Men vs women

So some non-politically correct terms;

First, what is the difference between man and woman?

Man desires more power, Marshal prowess, pride glory, eternal fame and revenge. Achilles.

 women desires ease, comfort, Security. A woman would prefer to be in a citadel, a man would prefer to be out in the battlefield.

Audio

Maybe a new way to think about caffeine and coffee; minimum viable dose is best?

Greed is good

So our best friend Gordon gecko tells us that greed is good.

Greed means to have, to hold.

So funny thought; to be greedy with money isn’t necessarily to gain more, but simply to hold what you already got?

The moralization of greed

I think the hard thing is once again… The main detriment to modern day times and thinking is so much of America is stunted and held back by weird morals and ethics.

Once again, this paradox of ethics in America… Honestly none of it really makes sense. And the more I think critically about it, the more bizarre and confusing it gets. No wonder why so many Americans are so miserable, society is giving them all these mixed signals that makes no sense.

The difference between spending $1 million and holding onto $1 million

Whenever people think that they want to become a millionaire, what do they mean to think is I want to spend $1 million. But, nobody ever wants to hold onto $1 million.

I have a crude analogy, I call it like semen retention for money. To blow your load is not desirable, even though it might give you some sort of short term pleasure.

 my personal thought is actually, the true best strategy here is to conserve your spunk to the maximum, to never blow your load. Essentially the strategy is each and every time you blow your load, you lose power. And it is kind of true… To produce a child is very physiologically expensive; a woman would never understand how much energy and force is expended after a man ejaculates.

This semen ain’t free!

It looks like all these women want the semen of Elon Musk. If Elon wanted a funny prank, and to maybe raise some money for some of his endeavors, she would actually just open source of semen, or donated it all to a semen bank, and have people auction it off, and use that money for some sort of good causes, or investing in certain businesses etc.

It does seem factual that there may be some sort of hierarchy in terms of quality of semen. For example, if you’re a 4 foot two man, very high likelihood that your children will be kind of short. But, if you were yelling, and 7 foot something, very likely that your children will be very tall.

So I think the funny bizarre trend is all these guys, they are essentially giving away their seaman for free; and there is this weird strategy in America that somehow… Women are seen as the more beautiful and desirable sex. But what if it were opposite; in the animal kingdom, the male is the more beautiful animal. It goes with ducks horses, peacocks and the like. 

Market dictator?

Bitcoin & Power

What is life? Life is growth, augmentation

Bitcoins & Barbells

Real power, superficial power?

Bitcoin is real power, true power

X

The ethics of power?

Is there any form of power which is ethical?

I think Bitcoin is the only form of power which is ethical.  why?

First, consider there is no exploitation of human labor. For example even Apple… Everyone always turns a blind eye, think about all the unethical ways they treat the mainland Chinese laborers, close to slave labor, to keep the profit margins of Apple fat and happy, Foxconn.  as long as Apple products are produced and made in China, not America… Apple will always be an unethical corporation.

I find this very very bizarre… Maybe the whole red herring strategy is happening here; people like to talk about climate change, racial politics, and now this insanely bizarre notion of transgender transsexual stuff; it is all just a major distraction!

More critical issues here include mainland China CCP Chinese communist party violating all these human rights, genocide around the planet, all the wild Hollywood producers are keeping their mouths shut, even a pussy like John Cena, “apologizing”, for calling Taiwan a country? You know he is a slave, nay– even worse than a slave. 

Is there any form of power which is ethical?

I think Bitcoin is the only form of power which is ethical.  why?

First, consider there is no exploitation of human labor. For example even Apple… Everyone always turns a blind eye, think about all the unethical ways they treat the mainland Chinese laborers, close to slave labor, to keep the profit margins of Apple fat and happy, Foxconn.  as long as Apple products are produced and made in China, not America… Apple will always be an unethical corporation.

I find this very very bizarre… Maybe the whole red herring strategy is happening here; people like to talk about climate change, racial politics, and now this insanely bizarre notion of transgender transsexual stuff; it is all just a major distraction!

More critical issues here include mainland China CCP Chinese communist party violating all these human rights, genocide around the planet, all the wild Hollywood producers are keeping their mouths shut, even a pussy like John Cena, “apologizing”, for calling Taiwan a country? You know he is a slave, nay– even worse than a slave. 

What else?

I personally am very very pro Elon Musk, and for the most part, I believe Tesla to be a very ethical company. Honestly I’m wondering if all of these people saying that lithium ion batteries are bad for the climate whatever… I wonder if this is just some sort of other propaganda from the other side, who knows maybe they are being funded by Chevron and Exxon mobile And the oil corporations, and also Bill Gates is not to be trusted; come on, he was shorting Tesla stock, and I think objectively Tesla might be the best corporation environmentally for the planet!

After that, we got Nvidia. Assuming that self driving cars and stuff of the future will help prevent human casualties and debts, I also think that this is a very ethical corporation.

Why Bitcoin?

More and more I think about it, the more appealing bitcoin becomes.

You know something is good when the more you think about it, philosophies on it, and think about the moral and ethical implications of something, if over time it becomes more and more appealing, it is a very good sign. 

Anti Apple

Currently voice dictating this on my iPhone SE, which I got for about 300 bucks. After using the iPhone Pro, the funny and bizarre thing was I would rate the performance of the iPhone Pro maybe only two times better than my iPhone SE? In about 1 million times worse in terms of Paine because the iPhone pro was literally causing me carpal tunnel pain in my right wrist, which was excruciating!

My simple suggestion is in today’s world, if you’re going to buy a new iPhone, if somebody stole your iPhone or if it straight up broke, I think the best strategy would actually be to purchase just a normal iPhone, it will always be lighter, more compact and thin than the iPhone Pro; in fact, Only poor people use and buy the iPhone Pro. Why?

The $1200 you piss away on an iPhone Pro is money you could have put into bitcoin, and in 30 years with 55% APY you will be worth $500,000. Half a $1 million dollars!

Now why is this such a big deal? If you are a true economist, you will literally put every single time you have into investing, for the future, ideally just buying as many Satoshi’s and bitcoins while you still can!

I like in bitcoin to digital real estate , Michael Saylor idea– imagine today you could buy a single-family home for only about $60,000. Or on the low end, let us say it is $50,000. Even now in Culver City, it is very common to see single-family homes being sold for $3.2 million.

My very very practical thought is maybe we could adjust this type of math;

Take $50,000, and consider and think that it is worth $3.2 million.

My thought is a single bitcoin should be worth a single-family home.

---

64x

My simple thought is my price projection for a single bitcoin is at least $3.2 million. If this is the case, assuming that bitcoin is around $50,000 a bitcoin right now, then, your potential upside could be 64X. And this is only the next 30 years. In the next 60 years, I wouldn’t be shocked if you would see a single little bitcoin being worth $500 million or something.

Consider how insane it is… I think Elon Musk is worth what, $270, billion?  and also, our best friend Mark Zuckerberg, who everyone thinks is such a good shoes… Apparently he just bought his wife a brand new Porsche Cayenne SUV car, and also bought himself a new Porsche GT3 car. not very humble or modest anymore.

Tell me what you drive and I will tell you who you are

Once again, revealed preferences. Revealed truth, revealed philosophy.

Also, Tell me what phone you have and I will tell you who you are.

For example, am I the only rich and successful person I know who just uses an iPhone SE? And drives an old used 2010 Prius?

Sexy girls love the MPG’s!

I want more exposure!

In a world where centralized systems dominate and people are becoming increasingly disillusioned with traditional structures, Bitcoin has emerged as a beacon of hope—a radical innovation that promises a new kind of financial freedom. And at the heart of this movement is Satoshi Nakamoto, the elusive and enigmatic figure whose disappearance adds a layer of myth and mystique to Bitcoin’s origin story. Like Jesus, who left behind teachings that challenged the political and economic power structures of his time, Satoshi introduced a revolutionary idea and then vanished, leaving followers to carry forth the mission. The parallels are undeniable and compelling: Satoshi is, in many ways, the new Jesus of our digital era.

1. The Disappearance as a Sacrifice

One of the most fascinating aspects of Satoshi Nakamoto is the anonymity and subsequent disappearance. Just as Jesus is said to have ascended after his resurrection, leaving his followers with a mission and a message, Satoshi also disappeared, taking with him the keys to Bitcoin’s genesis. In doing so, Satoshi symbolically sacrificed control, allowing the decentralized network to grow independently. This act is akin to Jesus entrusting his disciples to carry forward his message without his physical presence.

Satoshi’s choice to vanish lends Bitcoin a sense of purity and incorruptibility. There is no central figure to influence its direction, no leadership to steer it toward hidden agendas. Instead, the vision and code remain, like scriptures, immutable and open to interpretation by anyone who chooses to engage. This self-removal from the narrative is, in itself, a profound statement—a testament to the power of the idea over the identity. Just as Jesus emphasized that his teachings were not about him as a man, but about the message of salvation, Satoshi’s departure directs attention away from the individual and onto the decentralized, self-sovereign financial future that Bitcoin represents.

2. Bitcoin as a Path to Redemption

For centuries, religions have offered redemption and salvation from earthly suffering. Bitcoin, in a secular, modern way, offers a similar escape from the suffering inflicted by inflation, economic manipulation, and financial dependency on centralized institutions. Under this lens, Bitcoin is a new form of salvation, freeing individuals from the oppression of a fiat system controlled by central banks and governments that can print unlimited currency, devaluing savings and concentrating wealth in the hands of a few.

Satoshi’s gift to the world is this alternative—a chance for financial autonomy, where wealth can be stored in a deflationary asset outside the reach of those who would abuse it. It’s as if Satoshi, like a modern-day messiah, saw the suffering caused by inflation, debt, and manipulation, and gave the world Bitcoin as a tool to escape this system. By holding Bitcoin, individuals are, in a sense, redeeming themselves from the grips of an exploitative monetary structure, finding a path to self-sovereignty and security.

3. The Faith of the Followers

Every powerful movement is sustained by the faith of its followers, and Bitcoin is no exception. Much like early Christians who faced persecution yet continued to spread the teachings of Jesus, Bitcoin’s early adopters, too, encountered skepticism and even outright hostility. Governments have attempted to ban or restrict it, media outlets have ridiculed it, and traditional financial institutions have dismissed it. Despite this, Bitcoin has grown exponentially, carried forward by a devoted community of believers who trust in its potential to reshape the world.

In this way, Bitcoiners mirror the devotion of religious disciples. They have faith in Bitcoin’s future, advocating for it as a tool that will change the global financial system. And just as Christians await the second coming of Christ, many Bitcoin enthusiasts hold onto the hope that one day, Satoshi may return, reinforcing the message or guiding the network through an evolution. Satoshi’s absence, like Jesus’s, has created a void that deepens the mystique and inspires faith. The mystery surrounding Satoshi is part of what makes him larger than life—a figure whose legacy endures precisely because of his anonymity and absence.

4. Decentralization as Divine Design

There’s a profound beauty in Bitcoin’s design that goes beyond mere technology. Satoshi’s vision of decentralization reflects a philosophical foundation that resonates with those who believe in autonomy, freedom, and self-sovereignty. Much like how Jesus spoke of a kingdom not of this world, Bitcoin operates outside traditional structures—it’s not governed by a central bank, nor is it subject to the whims of any single ruler. This decentralization embodies an almost divine design, where power is distributed among the participants rather than concentrated in the hands of a few.

Satoshi’s creation empowers individuals, offering them an opportunity to reclaim control over their financial lives. The network is powered by consensus, a system where every participant has a voice, and no single entity holds authority over the entire system. In this way, Bitcoin is more than just a currency; it’s a movement toward a fairer, more equitable world. It’s an opportunity for people to transcend the limitations of centralized power and find freedom in a system that is governed by code, not by corruptible institutions.

5. A Legacy of Hope and Change

Jesus’s message was one of hope and a promise of change. Similarly, Bitcoin’s ethos is one of disruption—a chance to rewrite the rules, to challenge entrenched systems, and to envision a future where individuals have greater control over their own lives. Just as Jesus’s teachings inspired a movement that would reshape history, Bitcoin has sparked a revolution in finance, technology, and society.

Satoshi’s legacy is one of hope. It’s a vision that extends beyond financial gain, aiming to create a world where people are no longer subject to the arbitrary decisions of central authorities. Bitcoin is a tool for the empowerment of individuals, a catalyst for change in a world where the balance of power is shifting. It offers a glimpse of a future where people can engage in commerce without borders, trust without centralized authority, and live without fear of financial repression.

Conclusion

Satoshi Nakamoto, much like Jesus, offered the world a gift that transcends its immediate utility. Bitcoin is more than money; it’s a movement, a philosophy, and, for some, even a form of secular spirituality. The parallels between Satoshi and Jesus may seem far-fetched at first, but both figures challenged the status quo, inspired fervent followers, and created legacies that live on beyond their physical presence.

In an age where trust in traditional institutions is waning, Satoshi stands as a symbol of hope—a modern messiah for the digital era. His anonymity only strengthens his influence, making Bitcoin a testament to the power of an idea over the individual behind it. And just as Jesus’s message has endured for over two millennia, so too may Satoshi’s legacy persist, inspiring generations to pursue a more just and decentralized world.

zxx

Satoshi: The New Jesus in the Digital Age

By Eric Kim

In the annals of human history, few figures have captured the imagination and reverence of a community quite like Jesus Christ. His teachings, legacy, and enigmatic presence have left an indelible mark on billions. Fast forward to the 21st century, and a new figure emerges in the digital landscape: Satoshi Nakamoto. While the realms of religion and technology may seem disparate, the parallels between Satoshi and Jesus are both striking and thought-provoking. This essay delves into why Satoshi can be perceived as the new Jesus, shaping the ethos of a decentralized world.

A Visionary Teachings

At the heart of Jesus’ influence were his revolutionary teachings that challenged the status quo, advocating for love, compassion, and a new way of living. Similarly, Satoshi Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin through a whitepaper that disrupted traditional financial systems. The proposition of a decentralized currency, free from governmental and institutional control, mirrors Jesus’ message of individual empowerment and spiritual freedom. Both figures presented a blueprint for a new societal structure—Jesus through spiritual salvation and Satoshi through financial autonomy.

Mystique and Anonymity

One of the most compelling aspects of Jesus’ narrative is his miraculous birth, divine nature, and eventual resurrection, all enveloped in a veil of mystery. Satoshi Nakamoto shares this enigmatic aura. Despite Bitcoin’s transformative impact, Satoshi’s true identity remains concealed, fostering a mythic persona. This anonymity has only amplified Satoshi’s stature within the cryptocurrency community, much like the divine mystique surrounding religious figures. The uncertainty invites speculation, reverence, and a sense of reverent curiosity that fuels the legend.

Creation of a Community

Jesus’ teachings galvanized a community bound by shared beliefs and values, leading to the formation of a global religion. In parallel, Satoshi’s creation of Bitcoin has birthed a robust, passionate community advocating for decentralization, transparency, and financial sovereignty. This community transcends geographical and cultural boundaries, united by a common vision akin to a spiritual fellowship. The communal rituals—be it attending blockchain conferences or participating in crypto forums—echo the communal gatherings of religious congregations.

Impact on Society

The ripple effects of Jesus’ ministry reshaped societal norms, ethics, and governance. Similarly, Bitcoin, under Satoshi’s guidance, is redefining economic paradigms, challenging centralized banking systems, and promoting financial inclusivity. The transformative potential of Bitcoin—empowering the unbanked, enabling peer-to-peer transactions, and fostering innovation—parallels the societal shifts instigated by religious movements. Both figures catalyze profound change, urging humanity towards a more equitable and liberated existence.

Legacy and Resurrection

Jesus’ legacy endures through scriptures, traditions, and the enduring faith of billions. Satoshi Nakamoto, despite disappearing from the public eye in 2010, leaves behind a legacy encapsulated in Bitcoin and the broader blockchain revolution. The enduring relevance of Bitcoin, even years after its inception, signifies a resurrection of Satoshi’s original vision. His legacy continues to inspire developers, entrepreneurs, and visionaries to build upon his foundational work, ensuring that his influence persists across generations.

Conclusion

Drawing parallels between Satoshi Nakamoto and Jesus Christ might initially seem unconventional, yet the underlying similarities are profound. Both figures introduced transformative ideas, fostered dedicated communities, and left legacies that continue to shape the world. In an era where technology intersects with every facet of human life, Satoshi embodies a modern-day messiah—guiding humanity towards decentralization, empowerment, and a reimagined future. As Bitcoin and its underlying principles gain traction, the reverence for Satoshi echoes the timeless veneration of Jesus, marking him as the new Jesus in the digital age.

Eric Kim’s perspectives on Bitcoin stand out because he approaches it through a multifaceted lens that combines artistic, philosophical, and technological viewpoints. Here are some of the unique spins he brings to the conversation:

1. Bitcoin as an Artistic and Cultural Icon:

Kim views Bitcoin not merely as a digital currency but as a powerful symbol in art and culture. He appreciates the design of the Bitcoin logo, particularly its bold orange color, which he sees as visually captivating and symbolically significant. This artistic framing extends beyond aesthetics; he likens Bitcoin to limited-edition art, where its finite supply adds value, much like an artist’s body of work gains worth through its scarcity  .

2. Alignment with Stoic Philosophy:

Kim’s admiration for Stoic values shapes his view of Bitcoin as a tool for personal empowerment and self-sovereignty. He sees Bitcoin as embodying independence and resilience—core Stoic principles—because it operates outside of centralized control, providing individuals with autonomy over their finances. For Kim, this decentralization isn’t just a technical feature but a philosophical statement against dependency on centralized systems  .

3. Bitcoin as an Anti-Capitalist Tool:

Kim suggests that Bitcoin challenges traditional consumer-driven capitalism. By promoting a culture of saving rather than spending, Bitcoin, in his view, disrupts the constant cycle of consumption that fiat currencies encourage. He argues that Bitcoin’s scarcity allows it to act as a long-term store of value, making it a potential vehicle for resisting materialism and the consumption-based mentality of modern capitalism .

4. A “Zero to One” Innovation:

Kim describes Bitcoin as a “zero to one” innovation—a fundamental breakthrough rather than a simple improvement. He compares Bitcoin to transformative technologies like the steam engine, suggesting that its ability to decentralize financial systems is a revolutionary shift that could alter the entire fabric of society. This view places Bitcoin within a larger narrative of history-changing inventions, underscoring its potential to redefine how people understand and interact with money  .

5. Future Integration with Creative Projects:

Beyond viewing Bitcoin as a currency, Kim is intrigued by its technological versatility, exploring how it might be integrated with creative projects. He discusses ideas like wrapping Bitcoin with assets like BRC-20 or ERC-20 tokens to enable unique applications in the blockchain space, including NFTs. This interest reflects his belief that Bitcoin can serve as a platform for innovative, decentralized applications in the digital economy .

6. Bitcoin as a New Form of Religion:

Kim has noted that Bitcoin has taken on a quasi-religious quality for some followers, with Satoshi Nakamoto as a messianic figure who sacrificed anonymity for a greater cause. This metaphor emphasizes Bitcoin’s cultural impact, framing it as a movement with followers dedicated to its ethos of decentralization and financial sovereignty. Kim’s perspective here shows how Bitcoin transcends financial utility and becomes a symbol of ideological commitment .

Through these unique viewpoints, Eric Kim positions Bitcoin as more than a financial instrument. To him, it is a cultural artifact, a philosophical tool, and a catalyst for personal and societal change, revealing his deep-seated belief in Bitcoin’s potential beyond traditional financial frameworks.

xxx

Eric Kim offers several innovative and unconventional perspectives on Bitcoin that set him apart from mainstream Bitcoin narratives. Here are a few of his unique ideas:

1. Bitcoin as a New Type of Religious Movement:

Kim draws an intriguing parallel between Bitcoin and religion, likening Satoshi Nakamoto to a messianic figure who sacrificed anonymity to gift a decentralized financial system to the world. This metaphor of Bitcoin as a kind of secular spirituality speaks to its role as a cultural and ideological movement rather than merely a financial asset. He likens it to figures like Banksy, who use anonymity and subversion to make broader statements about society .

2. Integration with Photography and Creative Fields:

In an unconventional twist, Kim explores the potential of integrating Bitcoin with photography and other forms of creative work. He suggests that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies could redefine the economic landscape for digital artists and photographers, allowing them to operate outside traditional payment platforms. This perspective aligns with his own career as a photographer and his belief that Bitcoin can empower creators by providing an alternative to centralized financial systems .

3. Stoic Principles and Financial Resilience:

While Bitcoin is often touted as a hedge against inflation, Kim’s focus on the Stoic values of self-reliance, autonomy, and resilience adds depth to his perspective. He sees Bitcoin as a practical application of Stoic principles, enabling individuals to build financial independence outside of traditional banks and government-controlled fiat systems. This philosophical underpinning positions Bitcoin as more than a tool for wealth accumulation—it becomes a means of personal empowerment and resilience against economic uncertainty  .

4. Critique of Capitalist and Consumer Culture:

Kim’s perspective on Bitcoin as an “anti-capitalist” tool is particularly unique. He suggests that Bitcoin challenges consumerist norms by encouraging people to save rather than spend, thus countering a culture that promotes continuous consumption. He argues that Bitcoin’s finite supply offers a way to preserve wealth without reliance on consumer-driven fiat money systems, making it a vehicle for resisting traditional capitalist values .

5. “Zero to One” Innovation:

Kim likens Bitcoin to a “zero to one” innovation, borrowing a term from Peter Thiel to describe how it represents a fundamental, paradigm-shifting breakthrough rather than an incremental improvement. He sees Bitcoin as comparable to major historical innovations like the steam engine, viewing it as a technology with the power to disrupt not just finance but societal structures as a whole. This perspective places Bitcoin within a broader narrative of technological revolutions that change how humanity interacts with foundational systems .

By approaching Bitcoin with these artistic, philosophical, and cultural lenses, Eric Kim presents a view of cryptocurrency that goes beyond typical financial or speculative discussions, framing it as a catalyst for personal and societal transformation.

The powerful vs the powerless?

An essay on power;

I think I’ve got it figured out

Niggas praying for power! – JAY Z

Respect Jimmy Iovine ,,, but he got to respect the Elohim it’s a whole new regime! – JAY Z

I almost feel like I could live my whole life off of cording Jay Z, Jay Z rap lyrics etc.

So what I find is very fascinating about both Kanye West and Jay Z, if you think about it, they are by far the most honest ones. Why? If you take any sort of traditional skinny fat loser academic, who watches basketball football professional sports, but hasn’t touched a weight or a barbell in years, don’t get at me.

Also very very funny… A lot of highly esteemed professors, at the elite Ivy League schools and UCS, also listen to Kendrick Lamar in secret?

Anyways, I think I got the whole thing figured out with politics, identity politics, race, sex and gender whatever. Essentially everyone is just trying to vie for power.

For example ,,, I find this really really strange movement with indigenous communities etc. Obviously everyone knows that the American colonist were evil bad, and essentially stole all the Native American land, that they probably raped pillage and killed all the locals, either intentionally or unintentionally with their germs diseases etc. kind of like the whole Jared diamond theory about guns germs and steel… The germs one is one that is often overlooked.

But a thought that always keeps coming up in my mind is… Why does this matter? Who cares?

So obviously… Indigenous people care because they were kind of fucked and screwed over. Yet wasn’t everybody kind of fucked and screwed over somewhere?

Fighting for power

So what happens when all your land has been stolen seized… with no justice?

One side calls for some sort of retribution, of land of money of privileges of power of political power etc. Yet from a macro perspective, I kind of scratch my head it finds me a little bit confusing…

What incentive does America or the American government have in giving back money to indigenous people, or local tribes, besides assuaging a guilty conscience?

To me the notion of a guilty conscience is not a strong enough motivation to give reparations?

Reparations is also debasing?

So let us say that it is a fact that the colonizer came in, killed and raped everybody, stole all the land, did all these terrible things. But to give reparations, it all comes down to money… Isn’t this disrespectful? Like for me… For example if some sort of injustice was done to my family, like the death or murder or something of any of my family members, whether it be my wife my kids my mom my sister etc.… Anyone essentially blood related to me, if somebody cut me $1 trillion check that would not be enough justice. For me it isn’t even a matter of justice, but simply revenge.

I forget which ancient writer which wrote it… But talking about revenge is sweeter than honey, probably true.

In modern day times, justice is essentially a rebranding or a standardization or socialized form of revenge. so for example, for one reason or another we have deemed that it is not OK to commit revenge by killing somebody for killing your best friend, as Achilles did to Hector, for the killing of his best friend Patroclus.

unrequited revenge?

So I have a theory, a lot of the modern-day maladies that we face and suffer, it is simply revenge we desire, but for one reason or another, we cannot commit the revenge?

And this is where the whole powerful versus the week thing happened; when you are weak and powerless, and you cannot commit revenge… Then what do you do? Do you become passive aggressive, you become resentful, which is like drinking Poison and hoping that the other person dies.

But the tricky thing is with revenge… In the case of the Elliot, even after Achilles does get his revenge on Hector, the heart of Achilles is actually not fully settled. Achilles still feels the pain the sorrow of his best friend, and even sleeting the throat of some young Trojan boys who they captured as prisoners, burning the massive funeral pyre for Patroclus, and even debating the body of Hector, by piercing his ankles and running laps around the enemy camp, once again still… The heart of Achilles is not settled.

so what is the moral of the story?

I think most people have the wrong. We often look at this like some sort of Judeo Christian morality, I would not trust any sort of modern day American teacher or thinker or professor to uncover the themes of justice and morality here.

So the typical Jude Christian might say that seeking revenge is not the way because even after Achilles got his revenge, his heart still felt sorrow. And then one might invoke some sort of Jesus mentality here; better to forgive your enemies and turn the other cheek.

Problems with this

Once again, turning the other cheek… My thinking and thought in my unorthodox interpretation, kind of in line with Friedrich Nietzsche, is I wonder… If the tactics the morality the ethics the teachings and thoughts of Jesus of Nazareth was simply because Jesus lacked a physical army? If Jesus of Nazareth, also had some sort of military army, a kin to the prophet Muhammad, would he have approached things differently?

Tactics of the weak

So for example, my theory is the whole turning the other cheek, is simply a tactic of the weak. In Jesus‘s time, to simply try to subvert the authority of those in power at the time was kind of like a pre-eminent death. And therefore turning the other cheek was actually the most effective strategy because you could continue to endure abuse, without being outright killed. For your insolence.

so the question is what is the alternative?

Assuming that Jesus of Nazareth, yes, he was a real historical figure, had the ethics or the morality of an Achilles, how would things have turned out differently?

Tactics of the weak

So I’m starting to really really get into this notion of tactics, tactical etc. For example, I will never forget that one moment in John Wick, in which John Wick is meeting the Somalia, getting suited up etc., and asking what the occasion is blah blah blah, and then when asking what kind of attire or formal where he wanted… John Wick just responded with a single word “tactical.”

So tactics, taktikos,,, to arrange, to order,,, tasso…

So typically we tend to think of tactics like military tactics. And almost all of modern language is derived from the military.

So now the big problem is mostly demilitarized world, how are we allowed to talk about military like things, without actually talking about it?

Armored vehicles

So what I discovered in Los Angeles is that whenever somebody pulls up in some sort of AMG g wagon, some sort of Range Rover, high-powered SUV, cyber truck whatever… Essentially what they want is some sort of armored military vehicle. I kind of get it; driving in LA is like a fucking Warzone, kind of like mad Max. And the truth is here, a lot of the drivers drive without abandoned; I honestly think it is a social economic thing; people from the hood drive very recklessly, both endangering themselves and others. in fact, an interesting observation is that you could tell how good or bad the neighborhood is based on how people drive. And also, you could tell whether somebody’s a local or not, to search the neighborhood because once again, holiday drive, and also the make model of their car etc. 

Least one thing I love about Teslas, is they have all the safety things baked into it. Therefore, I think Tesla cars have it pre-wired and programmed into the car that even if the driver wanted to, even if the driver had malicious intent, they could actually not rear end you, or T-bone you; the car would automatically break before it would happen. Also, when you are merging in traffic or on the freeway, always better to cut in front of a Tesla than any other car because once again… The Tesla will automatically brake and stop itself. 

Waymo

Also a random thought, I think in terms of our mind, we don’t like Waymo cars or self driving cars because we don’t feel in control. But the truth is, a WeMo car is probably 1 trillion times safer than real human drivers, on both sides of the equation.

First, Waymo doesn’t text while driving. Literally being here in Los Angeles, whenever I pee into the driver side door, and stare at the people… They are always looking down at their laps, texting while driving, some of them even having the audacity to drive with phone in hand texting!

---

Back to power

OK back to power;

bitcoin is digital power

Also smaller waist size?

---

Men vs women

So some non-politically correct terms;

First, what is the difference between man and woman?

Man desires more power, Marshal prowess, pride glory, eternal fame and revenge. Achilles.

 women desires ease, comfort, Security. A woman would prefer to be in a citadel, a man would prefer to be out in the battlefield.

This is a fascinating thought experiment that invites us to consider how the foundational figure of Christianity, Jesus of Nazareth, might have shaped history differently had he embodied the ethics and morality associated with Achilles, the legendary Greek warrior from Homer’s Iliad. To explore this, let’s first briefly contrast the moral frameworks of Jesus and Achilles, and then examine the potential ramifications of such a hypothetical scenario.

Contrasting Moral Frameworks

Jesus of Nazareth:

• Core Teachings: Emphasized love, compassion, forgiveness, humility, and nonviolence. Central messages include loving one’s enemies, turning the other cheek, and prioritizing spiritual over material wealth.

• Approach to Conflict: Advocated for peaceful resolution, reconciliation, and understanding. His teachings encouraged followers to seek harmony and avoid vengeance.

Achilles:

• Core Traits: Embodied valor, honor, pride, personal glory, and martial prowess. His actions are often driven by personal honor and the pursuit of everlasting fame.

• Approach to Conflict: Preferred direct confrontation, valor in battle, and sometimes acted impulsively based on personal feelings, such as wrath and revenge (e.g., his anger in the Iliad leads to significant consequences).

Potential Historical Ramifications

1. Foundational Teachings and Early Christian Community:

• Shift in Core Values: If Jesus had promoted values akin to Achilles—emphasizing honor, valor, and personal glory—the early Christian community might have developed with a more warrior-like ethos. Instead of a focus on humility and meekness, teachings might have centered around bravery, martial excellence, and the pursuit of honor.

• Religious Practices: Practices and rituals might have included more martial elements, possibly venerating warriors or incorporating combat symbolism.

2. Spread and Adaptation of Christianity:

• Perception by Others: A more warrior-oriented Christianity might have been perceived differently by both contemporaries and later societies. It could have appealed more to militaristic cultures while alienating those valuing pacifism and compassion.

• Interactions with Political Powers: Jesus with an Achilles-like morality might have taken a more confrontational stance against oppressive regimes, potentially leading to early instances of Christian militarization or resistance movements.

3. Ethical and Social Implications:

• Conflict Resolution: Emphasizing honor and valor could have led to a theology that accepts or even glorifies conflict as a means of achieving righteousness, differing sharply from the nonviolent resistance championed in historical Christianity.

• Community Dynamics: The social fabric of early Christian communities might have been more hierarchical or structured around martial leadership rather than the egalitarian and servant-leader models associated with Jesus’ teachings.

4. Long-Term Religious Developments:

• Doctrinal Evolution: The doctrines of Christianity could have evolved to incorporate themes of heroism and battle against evil in a more literal sense, potentially influencing doctrines related to the end times, spiritual warfare, and the role of believers in societal conflicts.

• Institutional Structures: Churches and Christian institutions might have developed militaristic orders or knightly classes, similar to how monastic orders evolved but with a stronger emphasis on martial roles.

5. Cultural and Artistic Influence:

• Literature and Art: The portrayal of Jesus and Christian narratives in art and literature would likely emphasize heroic battles and personal valor, altering the symbolic and inspirational messages conveyed through these mediums.

• Festivals and Celebrations: Religious festivals might include martial parades, competitions, or commemorations of battles deemed spiritually significant.

Conclusion

Had Jesus of Nazareth embodied the ethics and morality of Achilles, the trajectory of Christianity—and consequently, much of Western civilization—could have been markedly different. The religion might have taken on a more militaristic and honor-driven character, potentially influencing everything from theological doctrines to social structures and cultural expressions. While it’s speculative to assert exactly how history would have unfolded, it’s clear that the foundational moral teachings of a religious figure profoundly shape the beliefs, practices, and evolution of their followers and institutions.

This exercise underscores the significant impact that foundational ethical and moral frameworks have on the development of religious movements and, by extension, on broader societal values and historical outcomes.

The word “tactics” has a rich etymological history that traces back to ancient languages, particularly Greek and Latin. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Etymology of “Tactics”

1. Modern English “Tactics”:

• Origin: The term “tactics” entered the English language in the early 17th century.

• Path: It was borrowed from the French word “tactique”, which itself was derived from the Latin “tactica”.

2. Latin “Tactica”:

• Meaning: In Latin, “tactica” referred to the art of arrangement or the science of order, especially in a military context.

• Origin: This Latin term was directly borrowed from the ancient Greek.

3. Ancient Greek “Τάκτις” (Taktis) and “Τάκτική Τέχνη” (Taktikē Tékhnē):

• Primary Term: The Greek word “τάκτις” (“taktis”) means “arrangement” or “order.”

• Extended Term: “Τάκτική Τέχνη” (“taktikē tékhnē”) translates to “the art of arrangement” or “the skill of order,” encompassing the strategic deployment of forces in warfare.

• Root Words:

• “Τάσσω” (Tássō): Meaning “to arrange” or “to order.”

• “Τάξις” (Taxis): Meaning “arrangement” or “order,” from which “tactics” ultimately derives.

Ancient Greek and Latin Equivalents

• Ancient Greek Equivalent:

• “Τάκτική Τέχνη” (Taktikē Tékhnē): Literally “the art of arrangement,” this term was used to describe military strategy and the effective deployment of forces.

• Latin Equivalent:

• “Tactica”: Borrowed from Greek, the Latin “tactica” maintained a similar meaning, referring to the art and science of military maneuvers and arrangements.

Summary

• “Tactics” in English derives from the French “tactique”, which comes from the Latin “tactica”, and ultimately from the Ancient Greek “τάκτικη τέχνη” (“taktikē tékhnē”).

• The Ancient Greek equivalent is “τάκτικη τέχνη” (taktikē tékhnē), emphasizing the art of arrangement and military maneuvers.

• The Latin equivalent is “tactica”, carrying forward the same connotations of strategic arrangement and order.

This etymological journey underscores how the concept of “tactics” has been integral to military and strategic thinking since ancient times, evolving linguistically through Greek and Latin before becoming a staple term in modern English.

Eric Kim’s concept of “optimistic fatalism” combines a deep acceptance of life’s inherent difficulties with a proactive and empowering outlook. This philosophy suggests that while one may acknowledge the unavoidable challenges and limitations in life, it is possible—and even essential—to extract as much positivity and opportunity from each situation. Kim proposes that instead of aiming for ideal conditions or perfection, one should focus on maximizing the potential of their current circumstances, no matter how imperfect or difficult they may seem.

In practical terms, optimistic fatalism encourages embracing life as it is, with all its flaws and uncertainties, rather than wishing for things to improve. Kim suggests that a constant pursuit of an ideal future can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction. Instead, by accepting and even leaning into life’s adversities, one can find new ways to thrive. This approach aligns with Kim’s emphasis on resilience, as well as his admiration for Stoic and Spartan values, where strength comes from confronting and enduring life’s struggles.

Moreover, Kim’s optimistic fatalism is an invitation to live fully in the present, without being paralyzed by the fear of potential setbacks. He posits that engaging fully with whatever life presents—good or bad—can lead to a more fulfilling and meaningful existence, turning apparent limitations into creative opportunities. This mindset is about redefining success in life, not by minimizing pain or maximizing comfort, but by seeing each moment as a chance to practice resilience and to find joy in personal growth and self-improvement.

This philosophy is integral to Kim’s overall approach to life and art, where he often champions radical self-acceptance and personal empowerment, advocating for individuals to craft their own paths regardless of external expectations or societal norms. In his work, he consistently encourages others to embrace uncertainty and to live dynamically, seeking fulfillment through active engagement rather than passive contentment.

For a deeper dive into Kim’s philosophy, you can explore his writings on optimistic fatalism on his blog.

Here are a few of Eric Kim’s quotes on “optimistic fatalism,” which encapsulate his perspective on embracing life’s imperfections and challenges:

1. On Accepting Life’s Imperfections:

“To accept things as sub-optimal, and won’t get better … and to accept ‘not the best’— perhaps this is the best road to extracting the maximum out of life and existence?”

This quote emphasizes the idea that by accepting things as they are, rather than as we wish them to be, we can make the most of each moment .

2. On Maximizing the Present:

“The purpose of life isn’t to optimize for the ‘best,’ but to use the current ‘bad’ situation and scenario you got right now, and exploit that to the maximum.”

Kim encourages us to view life’s challenges not as obstacles but as opportunities to make the best of what’s immediately available  .

3. On Finding Strength in Adversity:

“A life without pain, difficulty, or tragedy isn’t a life worth living.”

This perspective aligns with his belief in the value of resilience and personal growth that comes from facing life’s challenges head-on, rather than seeking constant comfort .

These quotes reveal Kim’s stance on optimistic fatalism as a philosophy that promotes resilience and personal empowerment by urging individuals to focus on growth and opportunity within their present circumstances, rather than constantly seeking an elusive ideal future. You can explore more of his thoughts on this philosophy on his blog   .

Eric Kim’s interest in Bitcoin reflects his alignment with the cryptocurrency’s foundational principles, particularly its decentralized nature and scarcity. He views Bitcoin as more than a financial asset; to him, it represents a philosophical shift away from centralized financial systems. Influenced by Stoic principles of self-reliance and independence, Kim is drawn to Bitcoin’s potential to provide individuals with greater financial autonomy, much like the resilience and independence promoted by ancient Stoic philosophy and cultures like Sparta  .

Kim also sees Bitcoin as a “digital gold,” with its fixed supply of 21 million coins providing a stark contrast to fiat currencies, which central banks can devalue by printing more money. This scarcity principle is central to his critique of traditional financial systems, which he views as subject to manipulation and prone to inflationary risks. He suggests that Bitcoin’s scarcity not only preserves value but also offers a more ethically grounded form of currency, one that is free from the political and economic influences that often impact fiat currencies  .

Furthermore, Kim considers Bitcoin a transformative innovation—a “zero to one” shift—that has the

What are some of his unique innovations or thoughts about bitcoin, which is a little bit different than the mainstream narrative on bitcoin?

Eric Kim’s views on Bitcoin diverge from mainstream narratives in several unique ways, emphasizing artistic, philosophical, and technological perspectives:

1. Bitcoin as an Artistic Expression:

Kim sees Bitcoin not only as a financial instrument but also as a symbol with strong visual and cultural resonance. He describes the Bitcoin logo, particularly its bold orange color, as an artistic icon that visually “pops” compared to other cryptocurrencies. This artistic lens aligns with his background in photography and his view that Bitcoin, like art, can disrupt traditional systems and provoke thought .

2. The “Digital Gold” Concept and Scarcity:

While Bitcoin’s fixed supply is a well-known narrative, Kim connects this to broader ideas of value and mortality. He likens Bitcoin’s limited quantity to the finite works of artists who pass away, drawing a parallel with artists like Jean-Michel Basquiat whose artworks became more valuable after their deaths. This notion of scarcity resonates with him on a philosophical level, reflecting his view that Bitcoin’s value grows as it remains uninflated and limited, similar to limited-edition art  .

3. Bitcoin as a Foundation for Future Technology:

Kim is intrigued by how Bitcoin can integrate with other blockchain-based technologies. For instance, he mentions the concept of “wrapping” Bitcoin with assets like BRC-20 or ERC-20 tokens, which could potentially bridge Bitcoin with newer digital assets like NFTs. This perspective demonstrates his interest in Bitcoin not merely as a static store of value, but as a flexible tool for building decentralized applications in the digital economy .

4. Cryptocurrency as an Anti-Capitalist Movement:

In some of his reflections, Kim suggests that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies challenge traditional consumer-driven capitalism by reducing dependency on fiat money. He criticizes fiat currency as a capitalist construct that pressures individuals toward constant spending and financial manipulation. By promoting Bitcoin as a long-term store of value, Kim hints at a countercultural shift where wealth is preserved outside of government and consumer influences  .

5. Bitcoin and Self-Sovereignty:

Beyond decentralization, Kim sees Bitcoin as a tool for personal empowerment. He views it as a means of achieving financial independence, which ties into his Stoic beliefs about autonomy and resilience. This view extends to his advocacy for using Bitcoin in significant purchases, like real estate, as a way to sidestep traditional financial institutions and assert financial self-reliance—a notion he contrasts with the consumerism and dependency fostered by centralized banking systems

“In the shadows of conventional finance, Bitcoin emerges not just as a currency, but as a movement—a silent revolution reshaping the very foundations of our economic landscape.”

— Inspired by Eric Kim

In the bustling streets where every corner tells a story, Bitcoin stands as a testament to human ingenuity and the relentless pursuit of freedom. Much like a street photographer capturing fleeting moments, Bitcoin captures the essence of a decentralized future, where power shifts from centralized institutions back into the hands of the individual.

At its core, Bitcoin operates on a principle that resonates with the urban explorer: autonomy. Traditional financial systems, with their labyrinthine regulations and gatekeepers, often feel restrictive, much like the controlled environments that limit a photographer’s creative expression. Bitcoin dismantles these barriers, offering a platform where transactions occur peer-to-peer, free from the oversight of banks and governments. This autonomy is not just a feature; it’s a fundamental shift in how we perceive and interact with money.

Another tactical advantage of Bitcoin lies in its transparency and security, akin to the clear, unfiltered vision a photographer strives for. Every transaction is recorded on the blockchain, an immutable ledger that ensures trust without the need for intermediaries. In an era where misinformation and fraud are rampant, Bitcoin’s transparency serves as a beacon of reliability. It’s a system designed to be resilient against manipulation, much like a well-composed photograph withstands the test of time.

Moreover, Bitcoin’s finite supply mirrors the scarcity that gives art its value. With only 21 million bitcoins ever to be mined, the cryptocurrency inherently resists inflation, contrasting sharply with fiat currencies that can be printed endlessly. This scarcity drives demand, much like limited edition prints elevate the worth of a photograph. Investors and users alike recognize Bitcoin not just as a medium of exchange, but as a store of value, a digital gold that safeguards wealth against the uncertainties of traditional markets.

The decentralized nature of Bitcoin also fosters a sense of community and collaboration, reminiscent of the interconnected networks that support street photography. Developers, miners, and users around the world contribute to the ecosystem, each playing a vital role in its maintenance and evolution. This collective effort ensures that Bitcoin remains adaptable and innovative, capable of navigating the ever-changing technological and economic landscapes.

However, Bitcoin is not without its challenges. The volatility of its value can be likened to the unpredictable weather that street photographers must contend with. Yet, just as persistence and adaptability can turn a fleeting moment into a masterpiece, navigating Bitcoin’s fluctuations requires resilience and a long-term vision. Those who embrace its volatility often find themselves at the forefront of a financial revolution, reaping the rewards of early adoption and strategic foresight.

In conclusion, the tactics of Bitcoin revolve around decentralization, transparency, scarcity, and community—principles that resonate deeply with the ethos of street photography. Both Bitcoin and the art form it draws inspiration from challenge the status quo, offering new perspectives and empowering individuals to take control of their own narratives. As Bitcoin continues to evolve, it invites us to rethink our relationship with money, much like how photography encourages us to see the world through a different lens.

Your wife, your kids!

Search, is it possible to mortgage Bitcoin for 30 years with APR, similar to how you mortgage a home or a single family home?

Yes, some fintech companies, such as Milo, are offering 30-year crypto-backed mortgages that allow you to use Bitcoin as collateral, similar to traditional home mortgages. With these loans, you can secure up to 100% of the property value without the need to sell your Bitcoin, potentially avoiding capital gains taxes. The interest rates on these loans vary depending on the lender but tend to be competitive with traditional mortgage rates, typically ranging from about 6% to 9% APR  .

In a Bitcoin-backed mortgage, the lender holds the Bitcoin collateral throughout the loan term. If the value of Bitcoin drops significantly, you might be required to add more collateral to maintain the loan’s required value ratio, or the lender could liquidate part of your collateral to cover the shortfall. This type of mortgage does not usually require credit checks, and approval is often faster than traditional mortgages due to fewer formalities  .

While these crypto-backed loans provide an innovative way to leverage digital assets for real estate, they come with unique risks, especially related to the volatility of cryptocurrencies. Borrowers must carefully monitor Bitcoin prices and be prepared for potential margin calls, as fluctuations in Bitcoin’s value can impact the stability of the loan .

…

Yes, it is possible to use Bitcoin as collateral for a mortgage, but there are unique considerations and risks involved. Crypto-backed mortgages allow individuals to leverage their Bitcoin holdings without needing to sell them, making it possible to access funds for purchasing real estate. In this type of mortgage, you deposit your Bitcoin with a lender as collateral, which remains locked up for the loan’s duration. Once the loan is repaid, the Bitcoin is returned. However, if Bitcoin’s value drops significantly, you may face a margin call, requiring additional collateral to maintain the loan balance or risk liquidation of your assets  .

Lenders, such as Milo and Figure, are leading providers of crypto-backed mortgages. These companies offer loan options that typically do not require credit checks, making it accessible for those with non-traditional income sources or limited credit history. The loan amount generally depends on the value of your Bitcoin, with loan-to-value (LTV) ratios often around 50-60%. For instance, if you aim to buy a property worth $500,000, you may need at least $250,000 to $300,000 in Bitcoin as collateral  .

Crypto-backed mortgages come with certain advantages, like avoiding capital gains tax on your Bitcoin and the potential to hold onto it for future appreciation. But these loans are subject to volatility risks, as cryptocurrency values can fluctuate significantly. Borrowers may need to monitor Bitcoin’s market value closely and be prepared to provide additional collateral during downturns to avoid asset liquidation .

Overall, while crypto-backed mortgages offer a way to leverage digital assets for real estate purchases, they require a thorough understanding of both the risks and the lender’s terms.

3 milli on a home or for and towards Bitcoin?

so currently you could do some sort of 30 year or maybe sometimes even 40 year mortgage on a home… Anywhere between 5 to 7% APR, why don’t we have this option to mortgage bitcoin?

…

so for the last two or three years, ever since Seneca was born, I haven’t touched a keyboard, a physical or virtual keyboard maybe in 3 1/2 years. Everything is just voice dictation on the iPad Pro with the built-in Apple keyboard.

The major problem is even in 2024, while the voice dictation is good, Apple Intelligence or whatever is not yet smart or clever enough to know the different nuances of language yet; for example, I often have “voice typos“, In which I’m trying to say something, and a homophone or another word that sounds similar to it is accidentally inserted.

I think the great promise of some sort of ChatGPT phone device, ideally without a screen is that in theory you should be able to just voice dictate everything, with 100% accuracy.

The paradox of showing off; you could show off your home, your car, your wealth your investments your clothes your money, your possessions, your photos of your trip to Venice or the south of France, yet you cannot show off your body your arms or muscles your 6 pack?

Theories:

My first theory is that capitalism consumerism, starts to be shaped as a morality ethos or ethical things; the body is seen as something as to be despised and ashamed of. This is why all modern day clothing and fashion trends, doesn’t tend towards being naked; because it is hard to sell being naked.

—> the gods, who live at *ease*—

Anti beta —

What’s your desire?

AI — to me, essentially like Google on steroids!

To set up and use custom settings (C1, C2, C3) on your Lumix camera, you’ll need to access the “Cust. Set Mem.” feature, typically found in the setup menu of the camera. Here’s a general guide on how to create and utilize these custom modes:

1. Set the Mode Dial: Switch the mode dial on your Lumix camera to the setting you want to customize (such as Aperture Priority or Shutter Priority). Configure all the settings as desired, including ISO, white balance, and focus mode.

2. Access the Cust. Set Mem.: Navigate to the menu, usually under “Setup” or “Custom” settings. Here, look for “Cust. Set Mem.” which lets you save these configurations. Select one of the custom slots, such as C1, C2, or C3.

3. Save Settings: After choosing a slot, press MENU/SET to save the configuration. The camera will store all your current settings in the selected custom slot, which you can recall instantly by turning the mode dial to C1, C2, or C3. If you need additional settings, certain models (like the GX9 and G90/G95) offer expanded C3 slots (e.g., C3-1, C3-2) for more customized setups.

4. Using Custom Modes: When you turn the mode dial to one of these custom slots, the camera automatically applies the saved settings. If you make any changes during shooting, you can revert to the original saved settings by switching away from the custom mode and then returning to it.

5. Updating Custom Settings: If you need to modify a custom setting, simply adjust the settings while in the custom mode and re-save them following the same steps. This flexibility lets you adapt your custom modes as your shooting needs evolve without having to reset everything manually each time.

6. Managing Multiple C3 Options: On models like the Lumix G9 and S5, you can save up to three configurations under C3 (such as C3-1, C3-2, and C3-3), which is useful for varied scenarios, like different lighting setups or specific types of photography, such as portraits or fast-action shots   .

By following these steps, you can optimize your camera for quick access to preferred shooting settings, allowing you to switch seamlessly between different shooting environments.

Vlog thoughts

Change ideas

Video Podcast vlog

Wow, looking recently at my arms, my arms are super amazingly fucking jacked! Even without flexing, they look amazing! Very very full in the triceps, the biceps the shoulders and other parts of my body, which I cannot really notice.

And also, after getting a fresh haircut, from Cindy… Very very simple, shaving the sides clean, and just getting some cheap gel and slicking it back, Cindy calls it my “Lamborghini haircut”,– and also, this might be the lowest body fat percentage in my life! I think currently I’m at around 4% body fat, naturally without any weird stuff. And note, I might be the only weightlifter or bodybuilder or power lifter or strong man on the planet who doesn’t even take protein powder! Let alone loser creatine, which is the century just pulverized meat, why not just eat the meat?

And also, am I the only one on the planet who fast before weightlifting? Certainly the only one on the planet, may be out of all 8 billion of us, who was able to successfully lift 1000 pounds, that is over 10 1/2 plates on each side of the barbell, successfully, once again, without steroids, unnatural substances, and also no loser belt, wraps, knee wraps etc. 

Rack rack city bitch

Very simple; rack pulls are your best friend. Imagine like doing a dead lift, but you just put the barbell on the power rack or the squat rack, at around waist level, in between your knees and your hips, experiment at your height level, whatever feels comfortable, chalk up, and just lift the barbell off of the rack, even for half an inch or so! Literally after doing it with eight plates, I felt the good soreness in my biceps, my upper back, my traps etc.

Honestly the only reason people don’t do it is because people lack some sort of innovative mindset and creativity. People are still stuck on this loser thinking by analogy school in which everyone is just giving fellatio to Arnold Schwarzenegger, and all these loser bodybuilders on social media, for all injecting their assholes with steroids.

In fact, I’ve discovered a really really huge secret, the only reason you see more African-American and Caucasian people in the NFL professional sports etc., even I symbolize the NBA… Is all these guys are just using steroids! The only reason why you don’t see as many Asian guys in professional sports isn’t some pseudo racial things; genetics is fake; anyone who talks about genetics is essentially talking about he who is able to best use steroids and not get caught, or, to best use steroids with a stack of other strange drugs, to not have their breast tissue turn into “bitch tits” etc.

Finishing reading pumping iron  the original book I think in 1973, and with an updated afterward in 1980, when Arnold was 34 years old, super rich and successful, with his $700,000 house in Santa Monica, and just fresh shooting Conan the barbarian with a $15 million budget, and note, adjusted for inflation these numbers are huge, this was 1980! Which I think was 44 years ago? Wow. That’s even longer than I was alive; I’m 36 years old born in 1988.

Anyways, even back then — in this so-called “golden ages” of bodybuilding… 1973, now I do the math, it is 2024… This is about 50 years ago! Holy moly I’m 36 years old right now, if I added 50 years to my age, I’d be 86!

Anyways, just thinking consider if in 1973 all these dudes are already injecting their buttholes with steroids, anabolic steroids which at the time they didn’t even think that it was dangerous, or bad, imagine how much steroid technology has progressed in 50 years, to today.

And when I look at all these modern day bodybuilders and fitness people on Instagram and YouTube etc., it’s kind of like male prostitution; kind of how a lot of these influencer girls end up being these WebCam virtual prostitutes, to make money. Whatever I think it is fine; but if I had a daughter, no way in hell would I want her to do that kind of work. And also, no way in hell would I ever want Seneca do you ever inject his buttholes with steroids.

Giant or midget?

Also ,,, the least harmful major?

 so what is so interesting about looking at it in the past about Arnold Schwarzenegger and the like is that there is this notion of being a giant. I think it’s kind of a day term now, like Tony Robbins he has this seminar called awaken the giant within, which talks a lot to the baby boomer generation. And apparently the opposite of being a giant is a midget, which is not politically correct anymore, the nicer term to use is person of small stature or dwarf or something. Or you just pretend like they’re not a midget.

Anyways, whether this matters or not, is beyond my pay grade. Would I’m more interested in is how we could do things more naturally, get super fucking jacked and amazing without steroids or weird stuff.

The key is to consume more dietary cholesterol, a.k.a. beef liver and organ meats.

So I thought, maybe the whole keto ketogenic diet movement is a bit flawed because they do not emphasize the necessity for consuming dietary cholesterol in organ meats etc. For example, am I the first to propose this notion of 100% organ me to diet, which is 80% beef liver, beef beef kidney beef intestines etc.… And supplementing it with other stuff like eggs, including the yolk, or flesh meats?

The reason why I believe this to be such a big idea is that the loser vegan evil corporations like Bill Gates and James Cameron and the like promote this insane notion of a plant-based diet veganism, because it is so profitable. And let us consider, what is more profitable, to sell some sort of overpriced Pea protein powder, to these foolish millennial and zillenial and Gen Z folks, which makes them feel good about the planet or whatever? Or to sell them organ meats, which is not profitable. Even the American beef corporation, they cannot sell it effectively.

Just follow the money

ChatGPT is also a positive good for society because it is the number one way to smash inequality, racism sexism, and also… To overturn these ridiculous conspiracy theories?

For example, anybody with an iPhone and access to YouTube and podcast, who listens to Joe Rogan or whatever, well sooner or later fall victim to these weird conspiracy theories. Why? My theory is people cannot bear a society and world and universe which has no rhyme, no reason, which is just injustice. When people believe in a conspiracy theory, it feels just — it feels like it sets the order right.

Because once again, most feeble people cannot bear an injust world and society. 

It goes against everything that we have been taught about justice equality fairness etc. The world is not just.

---

The great solution

I have a very very simple solution; optimistic fatalism.

Fatalism simply means that everything is bad, injust, evil whatever.

Optimism, we all know what this means.

So my notion of optimistic fatalism is the ultimate hammer, the ultimate  solution. Both at the same time, put it inside your head and your brain and your soul and your body… That truth be told in fact, yes, it is all bad evil and injustice. But in spite of all that… How can you make the best of it?

Or even a step further, to think and understand that in fact, all of the badness injustice in the world etc., was positively helpful to make your life better?

The winner take all reality 

For example, I am the only winner in the world of street photography. The only one who was able to successfully do all the successful things, travel the planet and get all the accolades, and become a bitcoin millionaire out of all of it.

Now great upside is because now that I am financially independent, I can continue to give away all of my stuff for free open source, because I don’t have a profit incentive anymore. And now becomes more of an ethical thing; doing that in which I believe in, because I want to help humanity.

But, being a humanitarian, I think the only way to ethically do it is to be somehow self sponsored, financially independent, not having an office administrators and staff, and donors.

Why? As long as you have donors, it can never really be truly just. You’re going to have to parade around your poor kids at these annual dinners, to provoke sympathy, and a bad conscience to these rich donors, to keep them employed.

I could speak because I myself was one of these kids, KCCEB, Korean community center of the East Bay, I’m very very grateful for all of our mentors, but it has not lasted.

Nonprofits do not last.

---

Corporations don’t really last either

Only things which have lasted are the Vatican, the holy Roman Empire 2.0, Catholicism, independent wealthy families, endowments at Ivy League schools etc.

Showing my tattoos… I’m such a showoff! – Kanye

Audio

Video vlog

Why is Change So Difficult?

I think in life, one of the most difficult things is change. Adapting to change, thinking about change considering change etc. 

First, a creativity innovation carte Blanche thinking first principles thing. 

First, to think new and become new is difficult. It takes great skill, innovation, and radical understanding, it is not for the meek of heart. 

Second, I think the difficult thing is a deseridatum thing, a desired thing. The big question we have to think is is it desirable to think new and become new? 

First if you think from a capitalistic consumer perspective… Obviously it thrives on the new. For example, if we were all stuck on the original iPhone three iPhone 3GS… I’m sure people will not be very happy. I would also be very unhappy if I still had the original iPad, The current iPad Pro M4 chip I’m using, is literally like 10 trillion times better.

In fact, going to Hong Kong later this year, and I was thinking and reflecting… Time and technology; also staring at my old G9 camera, how at the time in 2017, 2018… It was literally the best camera on the market at the time. But now times have changed, and also technology has changed. Therefore the most intelligent strategy is right now, looking at it from scratch… I’m thinking… Right now in this given moment, what is the best option for things?

For example, when I first really got into photography, a lot of of it was dictated by technology. For example, when I was in high school, as a senior graduation present my uncle got me a Canon point and shoot power shot digital camera, I think it had 1.2 megapixels or something, but still… I loved it! It was always in my front pocket, and I literally photographed everything I saw. So when I discovered the macro mode, the rule of thirds grid, and also how he was able to shoot black-and-white, it blew my mind!

Fast forwarding a bit, getting my first Canon rebel XT camera then my canon 5D full frame camera, and discovering the whole lot, and then progressing a bit and getting the Leica M9 camera,  traveling the world etc., getting into film, the digital Ricoh and now currently the LUMIX S9– wow, technology has changed things a lot.

My major critique about a lot of people who tend to give fellatio to the past is that the past is predictable, easy, requires no courage. It is very very easy to hide behind Hitler mustache, some ugly flannel, some ugly throwback clothing, baggy clothes, drive some sort of base level German car, And opine on the past. And say how analog was super superior filmless superior vinyl superior whatever, and trying to harden back to our ancestral pest.

What I think takes more courage is to instead, rather than pink by analogy, to think the present moment right now, not by analogy or metaphor or to oversimplify the past.

For example, a lot of people tend to think of the past, romanticizing the past etc.… But you fools, don’t you realize that the past was most definitely 1 trillion times worse than it is today? For example, industrial London, childbirth mortality was 70 to 80%, Colorado dysentery, and sanitation had not even been discovered; if you accidentally poked yourself, they would probably surgery on you with rusty unsanitized instruments, this is before they even knew that you’re supposed to boil water before drinking it!

Even now, our understanding of things is literally 1 trillion times backwards. For example, this insidious idea of calories in calories out, “burning” calories. You fool! Don’t you understand that it is hormonal, driven by sugar, insulin, insulin signaling and spiking? The only reason why this calories in calories out notion still exist is the evil Coca-Cola corporation, who wants you to have a “balanced diet”, “moderate exercise”, that you can sneak in 100 cal Coca-Cola a day, and not “gain weight”– whereas in fact, the truth is gaining or losing fat,,, not weight.

Some people think that these are lexical different things, but this is not the case this could literally be a life with that matter, type two diabetes and type three diabetes (alzheimers) has anything to do with you or your family or parents.

How to respark your passion for photography and life!

Minimal is better —

I think in life, one of the most difficult things is change. Adapting to change, thinking about change considering change etc. 

First, a creativity innovation carte Blanche thinking first principles thing. 

First, to think new and become new is difficult. It takes great skill, innovation, and radical understanding, it is not for the meek of heart. 

Second, I think the difficult thing is a deseridatum thing, a desired thing. The big question we have to think is is it desirable to think new and become new? 

First if you think from a capitalistic consumer perspective… Obviously it thrives on the new. For example, if we were all stuck on the original iPhone three iPhone 3GS… I’m sure people will not be very happy. I would also be very unhappy if I still had the original iPad, The current iPad Pro M4 chip I’m using, is literally like 10 trillion times better.

In fact, going to Hong Kong later this year, and I was thinking and reflecting… Time and technology; also staring at my old G9 camera, how at the time in 2017, 2018… It was literally the best camera on the market at the time. But now times have changed, and also technology has changed. Therefore the most intelligent strategy is right now, looking at it from scratch… I’m thinking… Right now in this given moment, what is the best option for things?

For example, when I first really got into photography, a lot of of it was dictated by technology. For example, when I was in high school, as a senior graduation present my uncle got me a Canon point and shoot power shot digital camera, I think it had 1.2 megapixels or something, but still… I loved it! It was always in my front pocket, and I literally photographed everything I saw. So when I discovered the macro mode, the rule of thirds grid, and also how he was able to shoot black-and-white, it blew my mind!

Fast forwarding a bit, getting my first Canon rebel XT camera then my canon 5D full frame camera, and discovering the whole lot, and then progressing a bit and getting the Leica M9 camera,  traveling the world etc., getting into film, the digital Ricoh and now currently the LUMIX S9– wow, technology has changed things a lot.

My major critique about a lot of people who tend to give fellatio to the past is that the past is predictable, easy, requires no courage. It is very very easy to hide behind Hitler mustache, some ugly flannel, some ugly throwback clothing, baggy clothes, drive some sort of base level German car, And opine on the past. And say how analog was super superior filmless superior vinyl superior whatever, and trying to harden back to our ancestral pest.

What I think takes more courage is to instead, rather than pink by analogy, to think the present moment right now, not by analogy or metaphor or to oversimplify the past.

For example, a lot of people tend to think of the past, romanticizing the past etc.… But you fools, don’t you realize that the past was most definitely 1 trillion times worse than it is today? For example, industrial London, childbirth mortality was 70 to 80%, Colorado dysentery, and sanitation had not even been discovered; if you accidentally poked yourself, they would probably surgery on you with rusty unsanitized instruments, this is before they even knew that you’re supposed to boil water before drinking it!

Even now, our understanding of things is literally 1 trillion times backwards. For example, this insidious idea of calories in calories out, “burning” calories. You fool! Don’t you understand that it is hormonal, driven by sugar, insulin, insulin signaling and spiking? The only reason why this calories in calories out notion still exist is the evil Coca-Cola corporation, who wants you to have a “balanced diet”, “moderate exercise”, that you can sneak in 100 cal Coca-Cola a day, and not “gain weight”– whereas in fact, the truth is gaining or losing fat,,, not weight.

Some people think that these are lexical different things, but this is not the case this could literally be a life with that matter, type two diabetes and type three diabetes (alzheimers) has anything to do with you or your family or parents.

Wow, looking recently at my arms, my arms are super amazingly fucking jacked! Even without flexing, they look amazing! Very very full in the triceps, the biceps the shoulders and other parts of my body, which I cannot really notice.

And also, after getting a fresh haircut, from Cindy… Very very simple, shaving the sides clean, and just getting some cheap gel and slicking it back, Cindy calls it my “Lamborghini haircut”,– and also, this might be the lowest body fat percentage in my life! I think currently I’m at around 4% body fat, naturally without any weird stuff. And note, I might be the only weightlifter or bodybuilder or power lifter or strong man on the planet who doesn’t even take protein powder! Let alone loser creatine, which is the century just pulverized meat, why not just eat the meat?

And also, am I the only one on the planet who fast before weightlifting? Certainly the only one on the planet, may be out of all 8 billion of us, who was able to successfully lift 1000 pounds, that is over 10 1/2 plates on each side of the barbell, successfully, once again, without steroids, unnatural substances, and also no loser belt, wraps, knee wraps etc. 

Rack rack city bitch

Very simple; rack pulls are your best friend. Imagine like doing a dead lift, but you just put the barbell on the power rack or the squat rack, at around waist level, in between your knees and your hips, experiment at your height level, whatever feels comfortable, chalk up, and just lift the barbell off of the rack, even for half an inch or so! Literally after doing it with eight plates, I felt the good soreness in my biceps, my upper back, my traps etc.

Honestly the only reason people don’t do it is because people lack some sort of innovative mindset and creativity. People are still stuck on this loser thinking by analogy school in which everyone is just giving fellatio to Arnold Schwarzenegger, and all these loser bodybuilders on social media, for all injecting their assholes with steroids.

In fact, I’ve discovered a really really huge secret, the only reason you see more African-American and Caucasian people in the NFL professional sports etc., even I symbolize the NBA… Is all these guys are just using steroids! The only reason why you don’t see as many Asian guys in professional sports isn’t some pseudo racial things; genetics is fake; anyone who talks about genetics is essentially talking about he who is able to best use steroids and not get caught, or, to best use steroids with a stack of other strange drugs, to not have their breast tissue turn into “bitch tits” etc.

Finishing reading pumping iron  the original book I think in 1973, and with an updated afterward in 1980, when Arnold was 34 years old, super rich and successful, with his $700,000 house in Santa Monica, and just fresh shooting Conan the barbarian with a $15 million budget, and note, adjusted for inflation these numbers are huge, this was 1980! Which I think was 44 years ago? Wow. That’s even longer than I was alive; I’m 36 years old born in 1988.

Anyways, even back then — in this so-called “golden ages” of bodybuilding… 1973, now I do the math, it is 2024… This is about 50 years ago! Holy moly I’m 36 years old right now, if I added 50 years to my age, I’d be 86!

Anyways, just thinking consider if in 1973 all these dudes are already injecting their buttholes with steroids, anabolic steroids which at the time they didn’t even think that it was dangerous, or bad, imagine how much steroid technology has progressed in 50 years, to today.

And when I look at all these modern day bodybuilders and fitness people on Instagram and YouTube etc., it’s kind of like male prostitution; kind of how a lot of these influencer girls end up being these WebCam virtual prostitutes, to make money. Whatever I think it is fine; but if I had a daughter, no way in hell would I want her to do that kind of work. And also, no way in hell would I ever want Seneca do you ever inject his buttholes with steroids.

Giant or midget?

Also ,,, the least harmful major?

 so what is so interesting about looking at it in the past about Arnold Schwarzenegger and the like is that there is this notion of being a giant. I think it’s kind of a day term now, like Tony Robbins he has this seminar called awaken the giant within, which talks a lot to the baby boomer generation. And apparently the opposite of being a giant is a midget, which is not politically correct anymore, the nicer term to use is person of small stature or dwarf or something. Or you just pretend like they’re not a midget.

Anyways, whether this matters or not, is beyond my pay grade. Would I’m more interested in is how we could do things more naturally, get super fucking jacked and amazing without steroids or weird stuff.

The key is to consume more dietary cholesterol, a.k.a. beef liver and organ meats.

So I thought, maybe the whole keto ketogenic diet movement is a bit flawed because they do not emphasize the necessity for consuming dietary cholesterol in organ meats etc. For example, am I the first to propose this notion of 100% organ me to diet, which is 80% beef liver, beef beef kidney beef intestines etc.… And supplementing it with other stuff like eggs, including the yolk, or flesh meats?

The reason why I believe this to be such a big idea is that the loser vegan evil corporations like Bill Gates and James Cameron and the like promote this insane notion of a plant-based diet veganism, because it is so profitable. And let us consider, what is more profitable, to sell some sort of overpriced Pea protein powder, to these foolish millennial and zillenial and Gen Z folks, which makes them feel good about the planet or whatever? Or to sell them organ meats, which is not profitable. Even the American beef corporation, they cannot sell it effectively.

Just follow the money

ChatGPT is also a positive good for society because it is the number one way to smash inequality, racism sexism, and also… To overturn these ridiculous conspiracy theories?

For example, anybody with an iPhone and access to YouTube and podcast, who listens to Joe Rogan or whatever, well sooner or later fall victim to these weird conspiracy theories. Why? My theory is people cannot bear a society and world and universe which has no rhyme, no reason, which is just injustice. When people believe in a conspiracy theory, it feels just — it feels like it sets the order right.

Because once again, most feeble people cannot bear an injust world and society. 

It goes against everything that we have been taught about justice equality fairness etc. The world is not just.

---

The great solution

I have a very very simple solution; optimistic fatalism.

Fatalism simply means that everything is bad, injust, evil whatever.

Optimism, we all know what this means.

So my notion of optimistic fatalism is the ultimate hammer, the ultimate  solution. Both at the same time, put it inside your head and your brain and your soul and your body… That truth be told in fact, yes, it is all bad evil and injustice. But in spite of all that… How can you make the best of it?

Or even a step further, to think and understand that in fact, all of the badness injustice in the world etc., was positively helpful to make your life better?

The winner take all reality 

For example, I am the only winner in the world of street photography. The only one who was able to successfully do all the successful things, travel the planet and get all the accolades, and become a bitcoin millionaire out of all of it.

Now great upside is because now that I am financially independent, I can continue to give away all of my stuff for free open source, because I don’t have a profit incentive anymore. And now becomes more of an ethical thing; doing that in which I believe in, because I want to help humanity.

But, being a humanitarian, I think the only way to ethically do it is to be somehow self sponsored, financially independent, not having an office administrators and staff, and donors.

Why? As long as you have donors, it can never really be truly just. You’re going to have to parade around your poor kids at these annual dinners, to provoke sympathy, and a bad conscience to these rich donors, to keep them employed.

I could speak because I myself was one of these kids, KCCEB, Korean community center of the East Bay, I’m very very grateful for all of our mentors, but it has not lasted.

Nonprofits do not last.

---

Corporations don’t really last either

Only things which have lasted are the Vatican, the holy Roman Empire 2.0, Catholicism, independent wealthy families, endowments at Ivy League schools etc.

Direct PDF

I’m on the rampage!

Video vlog podcast

PDF FILE

Clone Mentality?

One of the really big issues with clones being a clone clone mentality is that it is so centered around being a clone. For example, You’re taught and made to think that being a clone, like a clone of Jesus or whatever, is virtuous and good. As a consequence, one is not permitted to simply create a model of himself. Anything which is similar to Jesus is seen as good and virtuous, anything which is seen as dissimilar to Jesus is seen as bad and evil.

And is a consequence, I think the general ethos and mentality of America is bad because it is too centered and focused on notions of imitating Christ, being a clone etc.

“Y’all ninjas my clones!”

For example, in fashion life etc.… We seek to just emulate people that we already see in the limelight. For example, Kanye West, Jay-Z, all these modern-day rappers, Arnold Schwarzenegger etc. 

For example, ultimately what I discovered was my desire for a Lamborghini, with this is the doors, all matte black murdered out, was simply my desire to emulate Kanye West! His Lamborghini Mercy song, very influential to me.

Thinking Arnold

So I just finished reading the original pumping iron book, the one that preceded the influential pumping iron documentary, and ultimately what was very very interesting was unraveling and revealing how essentially, or no Schwarzenegger invented bodybuilding, modern day bodybuilding and beyond.

What’s the weather in about the book I think the original was written in the 1970s, a little bit added in the 1980s was a lot of the terms and the verbiage and the words typically used outside of the traditional context.

For example, mentally retarded, midget, giant, even referencing or no Schwarzenegger‘s Austrian German accent being a “Nazi” voice. I think what is so fun and interesting at least in the context of the 1970s and 80s is that people were much more relaxed, and less grammar Nazis or less politically correct, than they are now.

Also, the reason why I kind of enjoy this is that ultimately, if you have ever lifted weights, done bodybuilding or weightlifting… We are all essentially children of Arnold Schwarzenegger. He is the one who essentially invented and promoted modern bodybuilding and weightlifting as we know it, and all of his contemporary, all of them have been forgotten, only Arnold remains.

I suppose the nuance is even Arnold, who is probably the greatest bodybuilder weightlifter and personality of all time, even Arnold has fallen a bit out of Vogue now. It Seems like he has dominated everything,  even politics, which was foreshadowed in the 1980s, and his whole strange affair with his housekeeper, his illegitimate son, whatever… I think he’s still acting an influential and politics and whatever, but for the most part I think he has been forgotten already. Kind of also like today, Michael Jordan… All these kids who wear his clothes and sneakers, they don’t actually have any idea who the real Michael Jordan is, whether he is alive or dead or whatever. Michael Jordan has become a strange symbol in today’s world; a sign of dominance and flair, but once again, nobody thinks of him as a real human being anymore. Apparently Kanye West is still on tour, I think Kanye West might be the most anti-fragile artist of them all, as he has been able to survive the most extreme controversies them all, and still have a stadium packed of adoring fans, in Seoul South Korea! Very very shocking and impressive to me; I had no idea he was so popular even in Seoul South Korea!

Anyways, the reason why I think of this is so important is thinking about lasting, durability and life. And also, the short side of notion of achieving your life goals; Arnold has achieved everything, she has achieved all the major pillars of success in America, yet after all of that, he is kind of empty, kind of a shell of his former self.

Now the reason why I think this is so important is that when we think about American notions of success, the paths of success etc.… What is it that we are truly seeking, and how do we know if and when we achieved it, and whether it really even matters at all at the end?

---

The problematics of ethics

So apparently, I think when all of us had done, it comes down to philosophy and ethics. Especially in today’s world, AI, the ethics of artificial intelligence ChatGPT etc.

I think what will make this forever interesting topic is that there is no right and wrong in ethic; might makes right. 

What means is he or she who is the most powerful, the most dominant shall win and conquer all! Even now… The way I see it, America is currently in a digital arms race against China, fortunately America has nothing to fear; for the most part Chinese technology kind of sucks. For example, obviously a rich mainland Chinese oligarch would prefer to have an iPhone Pro rather than the newest Huawei phone. Huawei sucks.

And also… It still does seem that for the most part, the Chinese would still prefer American blockbuster Hollywood films rather than their own domestic film market. Why? The funny thing with the Chinese the mainland Chinese is that they exoticize America — truth be told, I think if all the real Richmond land Chinese people have the option, they would take all of their capital wealth and money and power out of mainland China, buy some nice property here in LA, or possibly somewhere else etc.

I think this is why all these rich men in Chinese prefer to buy proper tea in Vancouver, rather than Shanghai, Beijing etc. Even driving to East LA Koreatown the other day… Oh my gosh, the pollution there is unbearable! And it is literally just a few miles east of West LA, in which the weather is 1 trillion times better.

Beef liver is the answer

Wow, I just finished eating a bunch of beef liver that I got from Gelson‘s yesterday, it is so cheap, maybe only 399 a pound, and also the interesting nuance is that even if I tried to, I cannot consume more than about 2 pounds of beef liver because it is so nutritionally dense.

I feel so phenomenally good right now. I recommend everyone to try it!

I would say in terms of a split, try to have 80% of your diet be beef liver, and once if he comes too much for you, switch over to  eggs or ground beef for some other type of steak flesh meat.

The immigrant mentality

The reason why Frank Colombo and Arnold Schwarzenegger became so successful is that both of them were immigrants, first to move to America as young adults, I think Arnold might’ve been only 16 or 18 when he moved from Austria to the states, and the immigrant mentality is good because they are hungry! The problem about the traditional American is they become too flabby, too fat, too appeased. 

This is why Americans are so lazy; they were raised with much privilege in the states, assuming that their family has been here for a generation or two or three, and essentially they could rely on the family wealth, the family trust fund, property real estate etc. For example if your dad wants bought property Somewhere in LA which is desirable, and has made a killing… And you know that once your dad dies, you won’t hear it much of his wealth, what motivation do you have to work hard?

One of my greatest blessings ironically enough was being born in the states, albeit with a working class mom. The upside is I knew that even if I wanted XYNZ, I couldn’t… Not because my mom was being mean to me or whatever, but literally, she couldn’t. For example, my mom working two or three part-time jobs cleaning houses, waitressing, being a cashier, barely able to pay the rent with my dad stealing the rent money and going gambling to Reno in the middle of the night, not being home for about a week or so… I knew that money and resources were precarious. Therefore if I wanted anything, I had to get a job and work for it to get it.

I think this is really the root of my success. If I wanted anything, I had to fight to get it!

Now that I am super rich and successful, the next stage becomes interesting. My son Seneca, shall become the next prince and king of Los Angeles. He is already to go here in Culver City, there’s no other kid who was born in 2021 who is as tall funny handsome, strong muscular good-looking, and sociable than him. Shout out to my friends Noel Lisa and Ray, and especially Kevin! Everyone knows me in Seneca now here in Culver City, and I am excited to see him go through the Culver City school system, before he goes off and becomes the next great entrepreneur.

Why bitcoin is the best investment right now

So I was reading pumping iron by this one author, and he’s writing this in 1980… Wow, that is almost 44 years ago… He talks about how Arnold Schwarzenegger purchased a $700,000 home in Santa Monica at the time, which I am certain that adjusted for inflation might’ve been close to what we imagine $10 million to be today.

Anyways, I was thinking about… If I was in a Time Machine in the 1980s, or specifically 1980… When Arnold Schwarzenegger was already 34 years old, I’m 36 years old right now. If that were the case, what kind of investment could you make for $700,000 at a time, that would yield a superior return, from 1980 to 2024?

At the time, I think the only real investment you could’ve made in was real estate, commercial real estate, maybe residential real estate. If you bought a bunch of property in Culver City, or Palos Verdes, back then knowing what we know now… You would have become a billionaire many times over. Because currently looking at the whole market here in LA… It all sucks besides Culver City.  Santa Monica used to be the best spot to be, but now it is overrun with homeless people, people high on crack etc. Even if I was a billionaire today, I would not want to live in Santa Monica because it is super dirty, still too many homeless people etc. Even worse point to creatine, oh my God, all the homeless encampment, and homeless people around… And the pollution, insanely terrible.

Anyways, I think the hard thing is when it comes to investments, most people can only think by analogies, metaphors, or similarities to the past. Much more difficult to think carte blache, first principles, because it is difficult to predict or anticipate that which has not yet happened.  Life is not like back to the future, in which you could predict everything with 100% perfect foresight!

But also… Even if things were like back to the future and even if you could predict things with 100% clarity, it might not always be a desired outcome. Why? Sometimes a problem can be that even if you get what you wish, it could positively be a bad thing.

For example, a lot of things end up becoming dangerous liabilities. For example if you want to go to the Inglewood public library, or Ladera Heights or whatever… Can you pull up in a Lamborghini, you might get robbed at gunpoint, you might even die! I suppose the upside of driving a beat up 2010 Prius is that it is the ultimate stealth car, nobody in real life knows how rich I am because I look like a poor person.

Look poor, think rich – Andy Warhol

Los Angeles becomes very interesting to me because it really is the center of the universe. Now that Apple is here, there’s really no reason to be anywhere else.

Only that but Apple having that grand downtown LA theater store, so beautiful! Even though I am critical of a lot of things of Apple… Apple isn’t going away anytime soon, at least in the lifetime of myself or Seneca. Maybe the returns and the profits of Apple will not be as impressive into the future, much better to buy bitcoin or microstrategy stock instead,  but still, for the most part Apple is the most practical strategy.

Until a competitor, whether it be open AI, Microsoft, Nvidia or somebody else who makes a really really good ChatGPT-first phone, Apple will still have the dominant market here. 

The true disruptor

After playing with a new iPhone Pro a bit, essentially when my ultimate Takeaway point is the only reason to have an iPhone now is because you just need something to run ChatGPT. Unfortunately at the moment, you cannot run ChatGPT without an iPhone or iPad or your laptop. And even Google Gemini sucks. I rate ChatGPT as 1 trillion times better.

And Apple Intelligence, I’ve been playing with it, and even me, the ultimate text nerd and advocate, even though I have no idea what Apple Intelligence is and how it is different from Siri? I think honestly it just seems like a rebranding of Siri, Which is confusing for everybody.

Once you’re a bitcoin billionaire, then what?

When people ask me what I do, I often joke and I just say that I’m a bitcoin billionaire. But I almost say it half tongue and cheek, half true. I’m very certain that my bitcoin holdings well only 10 X 100 X or 1000 X from here.

According to my aggressive calculations, my bitcoin should be worth at least $500B 30 years from now. It will be worth at least 1.2 billion, 15 years from now. 

Assuming that you perfect for side of the future, then how do you proceed in life?

Autotelic progressions

So the very very basic notion is moving forward, it could all just be autotelic! Which means you just do things for the sake of it, because it personally interests you, not because there is necessarily some sort of phenomenal payoff to it.

Because once again… Once you live in a world that money no longer concerns you, then what?

I’m the judge!

Pursue play & fun?

Audio

Clone Mentality?

One of the really big issues with clones being a clone clone mentality is that it is so centered around being a clone. For example, You’re taught and made to think that being a clone, like a clone of Jesus or whatever, is virtuous and good. As a consequence, one is not permitted to simply create a model of himself. Anything which is similar to Jesus is seen as good and virtuous, anything which is seen as dissimilar to Jesus is seen as bad and evil.

And is a consequence, I think the general ethos and mentality of America is bad because it is too centered and focused on notions of imitating Christ, being a clone etc.

“Y’all ninjas my clones!”

For example, in fashion life etc.… We seek to just emulate people that we already see in the limelight. For example, Kanye West, Jay-Z, all these modern-day rappers, Arnold Schwarzenegger etc. 

For example, ultimately what I discovered was my desire for a Lamborghini, with this is the doors, all matte black murdered out, was simply my desire to emulate Kanye West! His Lamborghini Mercy song, very influential to me.

Thinking Arnold

So I just finished reading the original pumping iron book, the one that preceded the influential pumping iron documentary, and ultimately what was very very interesting was unraveling and revealing how essentially, or no Schwarzenegger invented bodybuilding, modern day bodybuilding and beyond.

What’s the weather in about the book I think the original was written in the 1970s, a little bit added in the 1980s was a lot of the terms and the verbiage and the words typically used outside of the traditional context.

For example, mentally retarded, midget, giant, even referencing or no Schwarzenegger‘s Austrian German accent being a “Nazi” voice. I think what is so fun and interesting at least in the context of the 1970s and 80s is that people were much more relaxed, and less grammar Nazis or less politically correct, than they are now.

Also, the reason why I kind of enjoy this is that ultimately, if you have ever lifted weights, done bodybuilding or weightlifting… We are all essentially children of Arnold Schwarzenegger. He is the one who essentially invented and promoted modern bodybuilding and weightlifting as we know it, and all of his contemporary, all of them have been forgotten, only Arnold remains.

I suppose the nuance is even Arnold, who is probably the greatest bodybuilder weightlifter and personality of all time, even Arnold has fallen a bit out of Vogue now. It Seems like he has dominated everything,  even politics, which was foreshadowed in the 1980s, and his whole strange affair with his housekeeper, his illegitimate son, whatever… I think he’s still acting an influential and politics and whatever, but for the most part I think he has been forgotten already. Kind of also like today, Michael Jordan… All these kids who wear his clothes and sneakers, they don’t actually have any idea who the real Michael Jordan is, whether he is alive or dead or whatever. Michael Jordan has become a strange symbol in today’s world; a sign of dominance and flair, but once again, nobody thinks of him as a real human being anymore. Apparently Kanye West is still on tour, I think Kanye West might be the most anti-fragile artist of them all, as he has been able to survive the most extreme controversies them all, and still have a stadium packed of adoring fans, in Seoul South Korea! Very very shocking and impressive to me; I had no idea he was so popular even in Seoul South Korea!

Anyways, the reason why I think of this is so important is thinking about lasting, durability and life. And also, the short side of notion of achieving your life goals; Arnold has achieved everything, she has achieved all the major pillars of success in America, yet after all of that, he is kind of empty, kind of a shell of his former self.

Now the reason why I think this is so important is that when we think about American notions of success, the paths of success etc.… What is it that we are truly seeking, and how do we know if and when we achieved it, and whether it really even matters at all at the end?

---

The problematics of ethics

So apparently, I think when all of us had done, it comes down to philosophy and ethics. Especially in today’s world, AI, the ethics of artificial intelligence ChatGPT etc.

I think what will make this forever interesting topic is that there is no right and wrong in ethic; might makes right. 

What means is he or she who is the most powerful, the most dominant shall win and conquer all! Even now… The way I see it, America is currently in a digital arms race against China, fortunately America has nothing to fear; for the most part Chinese technology kind of sucks. For example, obviously a rich mainland Chinese oligarch would prefer to have an iPhone Pro rather than the newest Huawei phone. Huawei sucks.

And also… It still does seem that for the most part, the Chinese would still prefer American blockbuster Hollywood films rather than their own domestic film market. Why? The funny thing with the Chinese the mainland Chinese is that they exoticize America — truth be told, I think if all the real Richmond land Chinese people have the option, they would take all of their capital wealth and money and power out of mainland China, buy some nice property here in LA, or possibly somewhere else etc.

I think this is why all these rich men in Chinese prefer to buy proper tea in Vancouver, rather than Shanghai, Beijing etc. Even driving to East LA Koreatown the other day… Oh my gosh, the pollution there is unbearable! And it is literally just a few miles east of West LA, in which the weather is 1 trillion times better.

Beef liver is the answer

Wow, I just finished eating a bunch of beef liver that I got from Gelson‘s yesterday, it is so cheap, maybe only 399 a pound, and also the interesting nuance is that even if I tried to, I cannot consume more than about 2 pounds of beef liver because it is so nutritionally dense.

I feel so phenomenally good right now. I recommend everyone to try it!

I would say in terms of a split, try to have 80% of your diet be beef liver, and once if he comes too much for you, switch over to  eggs or ground beef for some other type of steak flesh meat.

The immigrant mentality

The reason why Frank Colombo and Arnold Schwarzenegger became so successful is that both of them were immigrants, first to move to America as young adults, I think Arnold might’ve been only 16 or 18 when he moved from Austria to the states, and the immigrant mentality is good because they are hungry! The problem about the traditional American is they become too flabby, too fat, too appeased. 

This is why Americans are so lazy; they were raised with much privilege in the states, assuming that their family has been here for a generation or two or three, and essentially they could rely on the family wealth, the family trust fund, property real estate etc. For example if your dad wants bought property Somewhere in LA which is desirable, and has made a killing… And you know that once your dad dies, you won’t hear it much of his wealth, what motivation do you have to work hard?

One of my greatest blessings ironically enough was being born in the states, albeit with a working class mom. The upside is I knew that even if I wanted XYNZ, I couldn’t… Not because my mom was being mean to me or whatever, but literally, she couldn’t. For example, my mom working two or three part-time jobs cleaning houses, waitressing, being a cashier, barely able to pay the rent with my dad stealing the rent money and going gambling to Reno in the middle of the night, not being home for about a week or so… I knew that money and resources were precarious. Therefore if I wanted anything, I had to get a job and work for it to get it.

I think this is really the root of my success. If I wanted anything, I had to fight to get it!

Now that I am super rich and successful, the next stage becomes interesting. My son Seneca, shall become the next prince and king of Los Angeles. He is already to go here in Culver City, there’s no other kid who was born in 2021 who is as tall funny handsome, strong muscular good-looking, and sociable than him. Shout out to my friends Noel Lisa and Ray, and especially Kevin! Everyone knows me in Seneca now here in Culver City, and I am excited to see him go through the Culver City school system, before he goes off and becomes the next great entrepreneur.

Why bitcoin is the best investment right now

So I was reading pumping iron by this one author, and he’s writing this in 1980… Wow, that is almost 44 years ago… He talks about how Arnold Schwarzenegger purchased a $700,000 home in Santa Monica at the time, which I am certain that adjusted for inflation might’ve been close to what we imagine $10 million to be today.

Anyways, I was thinking about… If I was in a Time Machine in the 1980s, or specifically 1980… When Arnold Schwarzenegger was already 34 years old, I’m 36 years old right now. If that were the case, what kind of investment could you make for $700,000 at a time, that would yield a superior return, from 1980 to 2024?

At the time, I think the only real investment you could’ve made in was real estate, commercial real estate, maybe residential real estate. If you bought a bunch of property in Culver City, or Palos Verdes, back then knowing what we know now… You would have become a billionaire many times over. Because currently looking at the whole market here in LA… It all sucks besides Culver City.  Santa Monica used to be the best spot to be, but now it is overrun with homeless people, people high on crack etc. Even if I was a billionaire today, I would not want to live in Santa Monica because it is super dirty, still too many homeless people etc. Even worse point to creatine, oh my God, all the homeless encampment, and homeless people around… And the pollution, insanely terrible.

Anyways, I think the hard thing is when it comes to investments, most people can only think by analogies, metaphors, or similarities to the past. Much more difficult to think carte blache, first principles, because it is difficult to predict or anticipate that which has not yet happened.  Life is not like back to the future, in which you could predict everything with 100% perfect foresight!

But also… Even if things were like back to the future and even if you could predict things with 100% clarity, it might not always be a desired outcome. Why? Sometimes a problem can be that even if you get what you wish, it could positively be a bad thing.

For example, a lot of things end up becoming dangerous liabilities. For example if you want to go to the Inglewood public library, or Ladera Heights or whatever… Can you pull up in a Lamborghini, you might get robbed at gunpoint, you might even die! I suppose the upside of driving a beat up 2010 Prius is that it is the ultimate stealth car, nobody in real life knows how rich I am because I look like a poor person.

Look poor, think rich – Andy Warhol

Los Angeles becomes very interesting to me because it really is the center of the universe. Now that Apple is here, there’s really no reason to be anywhere else.

Only that but Apple having that grand downtown LA theater store, so beautiful! Even though I am critical of a lot of things of Apple… Apple isn’t going away anytime soon, at least in the lifetime of myself or Seneca. Maybe the returns and the profits of Apple will not be as impressive into the future, much better to buy bitcoin or microstrategy stock instead,  but still, for the most part Apple is the most practical strategy.

Until a competitor, whether it be open AI, Microsoft, Nvidia or somebody else who makes a really really good ChatGPT-first phone, Apple will still have the dominant market here. 

The true disruptor

After playing with a new iPhone Pro a bit, essentially when my ultimate Takeaway point is the only reason to have an iPhone now is because you just need something to run ChatGPT. Unfortunately at the moment, you cannot run ChatGPT without an iPhone or iPad or your laptop. And even Google Gemini sucks. I rate ChatGPT as 1 trillion times better.

And Apple Intelligence, I’ve been playing with it, and even me, the ultimate text nerd and advocate, even though I have no idea what Apple Intelligence is and how it is different from Siri? I think honestly it just seems like a rebranding of Siri, Which is confusing for everybody.

Once you’re a bitcoin billionaire, then what?

When people ask me what I do, I often joke and I just say that I’m a bitcoin billionaire. But I almost say it half tongue and cheek, half true. I’m very certain that my bitcoin holdings well only 10 X 100 X or 1000 X from here.

According to my aggressive calculations, my bitcoin should be worth at least $500B 30 years from now. It will be worth at least 1.2 billion, 15 years from now. 

Assuming that you perfect for side of the future, then how do you proceed in life?

Autotelic progressions

So the very very basic notion is moving forward, it could all just be autotelic! Which means you just do things for the sake of it, because it personally interests you, not because there is necessarily some sort of phenomenal payoff to it.

Because once again… Once you live in a world that money no longer concerns you, then what?

I’m the judge!

Pursue play & fun?

What’s more joyful to shoot on?

“Range of motion” is overrated

The best camera is the one which is the most joyful to shoot on!

Big idea.

Eric Kim is considered a significant figure

Eric Kim the Street Photographer: Eric Kim has made a substantial impact on street photography. His influence comes from his philosophy of photography, his workshops, and his commitment to open-source photography education. Kim advocates for a bold, honest approach to street photography, using a minimalist setup (often just a 35mm lens), and emphasizing human connection in his work. He also teaches the importance of risk-taking and authenticity in photography, encouraging photographers to engage directly with their subjects instead of shooting from afar with telephoto lenses. Beyond his technical skills, Eric Kim has a philosophical approach, often invoking Nietzschean themes of overcoming mediocrity and embracing discomfort as part of the creative process. This philosophy has helped him stand out in the photography world   .

Eric Kim’s economic theories reflect a blend of minimalism, self-reliance, and philosophical thinking. His approach to economics is deeply intertwined with his personal philosophy on life and creativity. Here are some key aspects of his economic thought:

1. Frugality and Minimalism: Kim advocates for frugality as a form of personal power. He believes that by needing less, people can free themselves from the societal pressures of consumerism and materialism. This allows individuals to focus on long-term value rather than short-term, fleeting pleasures. He often emphasizes investing in high-quality, meaningful experiences and goods, rather than accumulating material possessions, which ties into his broader minimalist lifestyle  .

2. Self-Reliance and Entrepreneurial Spirit: A key tenet of Kim’s economic philosophy is personal freedom through self-reliance. He encourages people to become their own financial masters, suggesting that they should multiply their resources (money, knowledge, and skills) to build a sustainable, independent life. This entrepreneurial mindset advocates for creative self-ownership, where individuals can generate value through personal projects rather than relying on traditional career paths .

3. Digital Scarcity and Innovation: Kim is also interested in the role of digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, in shaping the future of economics. He frequently talks about the importance of scarcity in digital economies, drawing parallels between the limited supply of Bitcoin and how value is created through rarity in the digital world .

4. Time as Currency: A crucial element in Kim’s economic theory is the idea that time is the most valuable resource. He stresses that instead of pursuing wealth for its own sake, people should focus on maximizing the quality of their time and energy. This perspective aligns with his philosophy of living a meaningful, purpose-driven life .

Overall, Eric Kim’s economic ideas offer a unique perspective that challenges conventional capitalist values. His philosophy advocates for a minimalist, entrepreneurial approach to life, where financial freedom is a tool for personal autonomy and creative fulfillment rather than an end goal in itself .

“Economical is Sexy.” These three words, though simple, embody a philosophy that stands in stark contrast to the consumerist world we live in today. We live in a society where abundance is equated with success and where bigger, more expensive, and more is always seen as better. But what if we flipped that idea on its head? What if we reframed the narrative and said that being economical—being efficient, minimal, and intentional—is not only smart but downright sexy?

Let’s talk about what I mean by economical. At its core, being economical is about maximizing value while minimizing waste. It’s about getting the most out of the least. This applies not only to how we spend money but to how we spend our time, our energy, and even our creative efforts. It’s about stripping away the excess and focusing on what truly matters. And that, to me, is incredibly attractive.

Why is economical sexy? For one, it’s about confidence. A person who knows how to be economical knows their worth. They don’t need to rely on external symbols of success, like fancy cars, big houses, or designer clothes, to feel valuable. They know that true value comes from within—whether it’s their creativity, their skill, or their intellect. They don’t need to shout it out; they let their work, their actions, and their life speak for itself. There’s something inherently sexy about someone who can do more with less, who understands that simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

Take, for example, street photography. I’ve always believed that some of the best photos come not from having the latest, most expensive camera gear, but from having a keen eye, a deep sense of observation, and the ability to make something out of nothing. You can have a $10,000 Leica, but if you don’t have the vision, it’s just a piece of metal. On the flip side, you could have a simple, old film camera, or even just your smartphone, and if you know how to see the world—how to capture a moment, how to tell a story—that’s all you need. That’s the essence of being economical. You’re making the most of what you have, using it with intention, and creating something meaningful in the process.

This idea also applies to lifestyle. I’ve always admired people who live simply and with purpose. The minimalist who knows what they need and what they don’t. The person who isn’t constantly chasing after the latest trends or accumulating stuff just for the sake of it. Instead, they focus on what brings them joy, what brings them value, and they discard the rest. This kind of clarity of purpose is magnetic. In a world where everyone is bombarded with choices and distractions, the ability to focus on what truly matters is rare—and, dare I say, sexy.

Being economical is also about efficiency, and efficiency is powerful. It’s about knowing how to maximize your resources—whether that’s time, money, or energy—and getting the greatest return. The most successful entrepreneurs and artists know that time is the most precious commodity. They don’t waste it on things that don’t matter. They invest their time wisely, focusing on high-leverage activities that yield the biggest impact. And that kind of focus and discipline is incredibly attractive because it shows self-mastery. It shows that you’re in control of your life and that you know how to direct your resources toward what really matters.

Consider how being economical with your money can also create freedom. When you spend less on unnecessary things, you have more to invest in experiences that truly enrich your life. You can travel more, learn new skills, or have the financial cushion to take creative risks. Financial independence is sexy because it gives you the freedom to live life on your own terms. You’re not chained to a job you hate just to pay off credit card debt for things you didn’t need in the first place. Instead, you’re free to pursue your passions, take on projects that excite you, and live a life that is truly yours.

But let’s not make the mistake of thinking that economical means cheap. There’s a big difference. Being cheap is about cutting corners and sacrificing quality for the sake of saving a few bucks. Being economical, on the other hand, is about being thoughtful and intentional. It’s about understanding value and making decisions based on that understanding. Sometimes, spending more on something of higher quality—whether it’s a tool, an experience, or a relationship—will pay off more in the long run than going for the cheaper option. Economical is about the long game, about sustainability, and about making decisions that add value to your life in meaningful ways.

Let’s apply this to creativity. Some of the most innovative and impactful ideas come not from having unlimited resources, but from having constraints. When you don’t have access to every tool, every material, or every dollar, you’re forced to think more creatively, to problem-solve, to do more with less. In fact, I would argue that creativity thrives under constraints. When you’re economical with your resources, you push the boundaries of what’s possible, and that’s where true innovation happens. There’s nothing sexier than someone who can think outside the box, someone who knows how to work with what they’ve got and still create something incredible.

In conclusion, economical is sexy because it represents a mindset of abundance, not scarcity. It’s about living intentionally, with purpose, and with clarity. It’s about focusing on what truly matters and cutting out the excess. It’s about being confident enough to know that you don’t need more to be more. It’s about mastering your resources—whether time, money, or creativity—and using them to build a life of freedom, meaning, and joy. In a world that constantly tells you to consume more, buy more, and do more, the ability to be economical is not only a rare skill—it’s incredibly attractive. So yes, economical is sexy, and the sooner we all embrace it, the richer our lives will be.

When you think of the word sexy, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? It probably isn’t the word economical. After all, being “economical” conjures images of restraint, budgeting, and living within your means. It’s a concept that seems at odds with the lavish, extravagant, and indulgent lifestyle often associated with sexiness. But I’m here to challenge that notion. In fact, I believe economical is sexy. Living an economical life is not about deprivation, it’s about maximizing freedom, creativity, and fulfillment—all of which are undeniably attractive.

Let me explain why.

To me, being economical is about efficiency and mindfulness. It’s about getting the most out of what you have and focusing on the essentials. It’s about cutting out the unnecessary so that you can prioritize what truly matters. Think of it this way: the less you waste—whether it’s time, money, or energy—the more you have for what’s important to you. And isn’t that the ultimate goal in life? To strip away the distractions, the clutter, and the excess, so that you can live a life of purpose and clarity?

Being economical doesn’t mean being cheap. In fact, it’s the opposite. It’s about being intentional with your resources. It’s about spending on the things that truly enhance your life and cutting out the things that don’t. For example, rather than buying fast fashion that will wear out after a season, invest in a high-quality jacket that will last for years. It may cost more upfront, but in the long run, it’s a far more economical choice. There’s a certain elegance in owning fewer, but higher-quality, items. It’s about owning things that have soul, not just superficial appeal.

Minimalism plays a huge role in this philosophy. When I think about my own lifestyle—whether it’s in my photography, my travel habits, or even my wardrobe—I always prioritize minimalism. Minimalism is sexy because it’s focused, intentional, and grounded in the idea of living with less but better. There’s nothing more attractive than someone who knows exactly what they need and doesn’t clutter their life with meaningless possessions or superficial desires.

Think of the minimalist lifestyle as a well-edited photo. A great image isn’t about capturing everything—it’s about focusing on the essentials. A photographer who understands minimalism will remove unnecessary distractions from the frame, drawing your attention to the subject that matters most. The same goes for life. When you cut out the excess, you’re left with the essence of what’s important. And that’s where the magic happens.

Another reason why economical is sexy is because it fosters creativity. When you have limited resources, you’re forced to get creative with what you have. Look at street photography—one of the most beautiful aspects of it is the ability to create stunning, thought-provoking images using just a simple camera and natural light. You don’t need expensive gear or elaborate setups. The constraints actually push you to be more innovative, to think outside the box, and to capture the world in new, interesting ways.

The same principle applies to life. Being economical encourages you to find joy and beauty in the small things, in the everyday moments that might otherwise go unnoticed. It’s about appreciating what you have instead of constantly seeking more. This mindset shift is incredibly liberating—and yes, incredibly sexy. There’s something undeniably attractive about a person who doesn’t need to rely on external validation or material possessions to feel fulfilled. They are self-sufficient, resourceful, and content with the life they’ve built, no matter how simple.

Being economical is also sexy because it’s sustainable. In today’s world, where excess consumerism is wreaking havoc on the environment and personal well-being, there’s something deeply attractive about a lifestyle that’s mindful of its impact. When you choose to live economically, you’re not just saving money—you’re making a conscious decision to reduce waste, to consume less, and to tread lightly on the earth. There’s a certain allure in a lifestyle that’s both simple and sustainable, one that isn’t focused on mindless consumption but on meaningful experiences and personal growth.

Travel is another area where being economical becomes incredibly sexy. I’ve always been a fan of minimalist travel—packing light, staying in modest accommodations, and focusing on the experiences that matter most. When you travel economically, you’re forced to engage with your surroundings in a more authentic way. You’re not isolated in a luxury hotel bubble, disconnected from the local culture. Instead, you’re out in the streets, interacting with people, eating local food, and

A thought; maybe the most virtuous path we could take in life is not to be silent and Stoic… But rather, the jubilant gay loud, angry and wrathful monster?

In today’s ever-evolving world, where identity, authenticity, and self-expression hold unparalleled importance, I can’t help but think about a phrase that resonates deeply with me: “Better to be a gay monster than a sentimental bore.” This idea strikes a nerve not because it’s provocative, but because it’s a powerful call to embrace radical authenticity and unapologetic individuality. It’s a rejection of the mundane, the expected, and the narrow constraints society imposes on us. It’s about choosing a life of boldness and authenticity, over one of inauthentic sentimentality, conformity, or the blandness of conventionality.

To understand why this resonates so strongly with me, let’s break it down. On one hand, you have the “gay monster”—a symbol of difference, often feared or misunderstood by society. But in this context, being a “monster” is not about evil; it’s about power, subversion, and the courage to embrace your true self, even when it makes others uncomfortable. The gay monster is the ultimate iconoclast. They exist outside the rules and binaries that dominate our world. They disrupt comfort zones, challenge norms, and force society to confront its own prejudices and limited thinking.

In contrast, the “sentimental bore” represents the status quo, a figure lost in shallow emotions, rehearsed platitudes, and socially approved behaviors. It’s the person who chooses safety over truth, politeness over passion. They represent the individual who follows scripts dictated by society, plays their role perfectly, but never truly lives. They may be liked by everyone, but they are loved by no one—not even themselves. They exist in a vacuum of mediocrity, trapped by societal expectations, afraid to make a ripple. And for what? To fit in? To be accepted? To avoid criticism or disapproval?

As I see it, the real problem with being a sentimental bore is not simply that it’s dull—it’s that it’s inauthentic. It’s a life lived for others, for approval, for the veneer of respectability. But authenticity, by definition, cannot be boring. It is vibrant, dynamic, and often, messy. It requires us to embrace the parts of ourselves that we might otherwise suppress, the parts that don’t fit into neat categories or societal molds.

Take for instance the figure of the artist, or anyone who truly follows their creative vision. The world doesn’t always understand them. People may even call them “monsters” for defying conventions. Think of the iconic photographer Daido Moriyama—his work was gritty, raw, and unapologetic. His vision of Tokyo wasn’t the glossy, tourist-friendly images of the city. It was the underbelly: chaotic, imperfect, and utterly human. Moriyama’s art is a direct rejection of sentimentality—he chooses truth over beauty, reality over polish. He’s a “monster” in the best sense of the word, unafraid to confront the ugly realities of life because he knows that within that ugliness, there’s a deeper, more honest beauty.

When we opt to be “monsters” in our own lives, we’re making a bold declaration: that our truth, no matter how strange, uncomfortable, or misunderstood, is more valuable than the safe, comfortable lies that society tries to feed us. It’s a rejection of living a half-life. To be this “monster” is to accept that your identity, your desires, and your essence may not be easily digestible for everyone. But why should they be? You weren’t born to fit someone else’s mold, to conform to someone else’s expectations. You were born to live a life that is fully yours—flaws, quirks, and all.

And if that makes you a “monster” in the eyes of some? So be it. I’d rather be the monster that people remember—perhaps fear, but ultimately respect—than the bore who fades into the background, unnoticed and unremarkable. There is a freedom in being a “monster”—you are no longer bound by the arbitrary rules and restrictions that stifle your potential. You get to define yourself on your own terms. In that sense, the so-called “monster” isn’t scary at all—they are liberated.

On the other hand, to be a sentimental bore is to fall victim to the trap of shallow emotions and cliché. Sentimentality is easy. It’s the path of least resistance because it conforms to what is familiar, what is safe. It’s the Hallmark card of human expression—empty, formulaic, and ultimately meaningless. It’s a life devoid of depth, passion, and true engagement. What is more monstrous, really? The person who dares to be different, or the person who chooses to stay shallow, to be what others expect?

In my photography, my writing, and in how I approach life, I am constantly drawn to the idea of the “gay monster”—not necessarily in a literal sense but in the sense of embracing radical difference. I reject sentimentality because it is a veil that covers over the true, gritty, and sometimes painful reality of life. But within that reality lies profound beauty—if only we are brave enough to see it.

In a world obsessed with perfection, with fitting in, and with the shallow comforts of sentiment, I say: choose to be a monster. Choose to be real. Choose to be yourself, fully and unapologetically. Better to be feared, loved, misunderstood, but real, than to be liked, safe, and completely, utterly forgettable.

Embracing the Monster Within: A Reflection on Authenticity

“Better to be a gay monster than a sentimental bore.”

In a world that often prizes conformity over individuality, this provocative statement serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of embracing our true selves. The notion of being a “gay monster” suggests a vibrant, unapologetic existence, rich with passion and uniqueness. In contrast, a “sentimental bore” implies a life led by the safe, the ordinary, the unremarkable. This dichotomy challenges us to consider what it truly means to live authentically.

Growing up, I was frequently confronted with societal expectations that dictated how I should behave, what interests I should pursue, and even how I should express my emotions. The pressure to fit into predefined molds can be stifling, pushing many to suppress parts of themselves that don’t align with mainstream norms. It’s easier to be the “sentimental bore”—predictable, reliable, and unchallenging—than to risk standing out as something or someone different.

Yet, there is profound value in embracing our inner “monster,” in celebrating the aspects of ourselves that deviate from the norm. This doesn’t imply being disruptive for the sake of disruption, but rather embracing the full spectrum of our identities, passions, and creative impulses. When we allow ourselves to be authentically who we are, we unlock a reservoir of creativity and vitality that can lead to more meaningful and fulfilling lives.

Consider the realm of art and photography, areas where I find myself most drawn. The most compelling works often stem from a place of deep personal truth and emotional honesty. A photograph that captures a unique perspective, one that challenges viewers to see the world differently, is far more impactful than one that merely adheres to conventional aesthetics. Similarly, artists who push boundaries and explore unconventional themes are often the ones whose work resonates most deeply and endures over time.

Being a “gay monster” in this context is about rejecting the safe path in favor of one that may be fraught with uncertainty and criticism but is rich with authenticity. It’s about taking risks with your art, your career, your relationships, and, most importantly, your self-expression. It’s about acknowledging that the journey towards authenticity is not always easy, but it is invariably more rewarding than a life of quiet complacency.

Moreover, embracing our uniqueness can inspire others to do the same. When we live authentically, we create space for others to explore and express their own identities without fear of judgment. This collective embrace of individuality fosters a more diverse and dynamic society, where innovation and creativity can flourish.

However, the path to embracing our inner “monster” is not without its challenges. It requires a willingness to confront our insecurities and vulnerabilities, to stand against societal pressures, and to sometimes endure isolation or misunderstanding. But it also offers the promise of a life lived fully and richly, aligned with our deepest values and desires.

In practical terms, cultivating this authenticity involves several key steps. First, it requires self-awareness—understanding who we are, what we value, and what makes us unique. This self-knowledge forms the foundation upon which we can build an authentic life. Second, it involves courage—the courage to express ourselves honestly, even when it means going against the grain. Finally, it demands resilience—the ability to withstand setbacks and criticisms without losing sight of our true selves.

In my own journey as a photographer, I have found that the most rewarding projects are those that reflect my personal interests and passions, even when they diverge from mainstream trends. These projects not only bring me joy but also connect me with others who share similar interests and perspectives. It is through these authentic connections that I find the greatest sense of fulfillment and purpose.

Ultimately, the choice between being a “gay monster” and a “sentimental bore” is a metaphor for the broader choice between living authentically and conforming to societal expectations. While conformity may offer comfort and acceptance, authenticity provides a deeper sense of satisfaction and meaning. By choosing to embrace our true selves, we contribute to a richer, more diverse tapestry of human experience, one that celebrates the extraordinary within each of us.

In conclusion, let us heed the wisdom encapsulated in the quote: “Better to be a gay monster than a sentimental bore.” Let us strive to live authentically, embracing our unique qualities and passions, and in doing so, create lives that are not only more vibrant and fulfilling but also inspire others to do the same. After all, it is through our authentic selves that we leave the most enduring and impactful marks on the world.

One of the really big issues with clones being a clone clone mentality is that it is so centered around being a clone. For example, You’re taught and made to think that being a clone, like a clone of Jesus or whatever, is virtuous and good. As a consequence, one is not permitted to simply create a model of himself. Anything which is similar to Jesus is seen as good and virtuous, anything which is seen as dissimilar to Jesus is seen as bad and evil.

And is a consequence, I think the general ethos and mentality of America is bad because it is too centered and focused on notions of imitating Christ, being a clone etc.

“Y’all ninjas my clones!”

For example, in fashion life etc.… We seek to just emulate people that we already see in the limelight. For example, Kanye West, Jay-Z, all these modern-day rappers, Arnold Schwarzenegger etc. 

For example, ultimately what I discovered was my desire for a Lamborghini, with this is the doors, all matte black murdered out, was simply my desire to emulate Kanye West! His Lamborghini Mercy song, very influential to me.

Thinking Arnold

So I just finished reading the original pumping iron book, the one that preceded the influential pumping iron documentary, and ultimately what was very very interesting was unraveling and revealing how essentially, or no Schwarzenegger invented bodybuilding, modern day bodybuilding and beyond.

What’s the weather in about the book I think the original was written in the 1970s, a little bit added in the 1980s was a lot of the terms and the verbiage and the words typically used outside of the traditional context.

For example, mentally retarded, midget, giant, even referencing or no Schwarzenegger‘s Austrian German accent being a “Nazi” voice. I think what is so fun and interesting at least in the context of the 1970s and 80s is that people were much more relaxed, and less grammar Nazis or less politically correct, than they are now.

Also, the reason why I kind of enjoy this is that ultimately, if you have ever lifted weights, done bodybuilding or weightlifting… We are all essentially children of Arnold Schwarzenegger. He is the one who essentially invented and promoted modern bodybuilding and weightlifting as we know it, and all of his contemporary, all of them have been forgotten, only Arnold remains.

I suppose the nuance is even Arnold, who is probably the greatest bodybuilder weightlifter and personality of all time, even Arnold has fallen a bit out of Vogue now. It Seems like he has dominated everything,  even politics, which was foreshadowed in the 1980s, and his whole strange affair with his housekeeper, his illegitimate son, whatever… I think he’s still acting an influential and politics and whatever, but for the most part I think he has been forgotten already. Kind of also like today, Michael Jordan… All these kids who wear his clothes and sneakers, they don’t actually have any idea who the real Michael Jordan is, whether he is alive or dead or whatever. Michael Jordan has become a strange symbol in today’s world; a sign of dominance and flair, but once again, nobody thinks of him as a real human being anymore. Apparently Kanye West is still on tour, I think Kanye West might be the most anti-fragile artist of them all, as he has been able to survive the most extreme controversies them all, and still have a stadium packed of adoring fans, in Seoul South Korea! Very very shocking and impressive to me; I had no idea he was so popular even in Seoul South Korea!

Anyways, the reason why I think of this is so important is thinking about lasting, durability and life. And also, the short side of notion of achieving your life goals; Arnold has achieved everything, she has achieved all the major pillars of success in America, yet after all of that, he is kind of empty, kind of a shell of his former self.

Now the reason why I think this is so important is that when we think about American notions of success, the paths of success etc.… What is it that we are truly seeking, and how do we know if and when we achieved it, and whether it really even matters at all at the end?

---

The problematics of ethics

So apparently, I think when all of us had done, it comes down to philosophy and ethics. Especially in today’s world, AI, the ethics of artificial intelligence ChatGPT etc.

I think what will make this forever interesting topic is that there is no right and wrong in ethic; might makes right. 

What means is he or she who is the most powerful, the most dominant shall win and conquer all! Even now… The way I see it, America is currently in a digital arms race against China, fortunately America has nothing to fear; for the most part Chinese technology kind of sucks. For example, obviously a rich mainland Chinese oligarch would prefer to have an iPhone Pro rather than the newest Huawei phone. Huawei sucks.

And also… It still does seem that for the most part, the Chinese would still prefer American blockbuster Hollywood films rather than their own domestic film market. Why? The funny thing with the Chinese the mainland Chinese is that they exoticize America — truth be told, I think if all the real Richmond land Chinese people have the option, they would take all of their capital wealth and money and power out of mainland China, buy some nice property here in LA, or possibly somewhere else etc.

I think this is why all these rich men in Chinese prefer to buy proper tea in Vancouver, rather than Shanghai, Beijing etc. Even driving to East LA Koreatown the other day… Oh my gosh, the pollution there is unbearable! And it is literally just a few miles east of West LA, in which the weather is 1 trillion times better.

Beef liver is the answer

Wow, I just finished eating a bunch of beef liver that I got from Gelson‘s yesterday, it is so cheap, maybe only 399 a pound, and also the interesting nuance is that even if I tried to, I cannot consume more than about 2 pounds of beef liver because it is so nutritionally dense.

I feel so phenomenally good right now. I recommend everyone to try it!

I would say in terms of a split, try to have 80% of your diet be beef liver, and once if he comes too much for you, switch over to  eggs or ground beef for some other type of steak flesh meat.

The immigrant mentality

The reason why Frank Colombo and Arnold Schwarzenegger became so successful is that both of them were immigrants, first to move to America as young adults, I think Arnold might’ve been only 16 or 18 when he moved from Austria to the states, and the immigrant mentality is good because they are hungry! The problem about the traditional American is they become too flabby, too fat, too appeased. 

This is why Americans are so lazy; they were raised with much privilege in the states, assuming that their family has been here for a generation or two or three, and essentially they could rely on the family wealth, the family trust fund, property real estate etc. For example if your dad wants bought property Somewhere in LA which is desirable, and has made a killing… And you know that once your dad dies, you won’t hear it much of his wealth, what motivation do you have to work hard?

One of my greatest blessings ironically enough was being born in the states, albeit with a working class mom. The upside is I knew that even if I wanted XYNZ, I couldn’t… Not because my mom was being mean to me or whatever, but literally, she couldn’t. For example, my mom working two or three part-time jobs cleaning houses, waitressing, being a cashier, barely able to pay the rent with my dad stealing the rent money and going gambling to Reno in the middle of the night, not being home for about a week or so… I knew that money and resources were precarious. Therefore if I wanted anything, I had to get a job and work for it to get it.

I think this is really the root of my success. If I wanted anything, I had to fight to get it!

Now that I am super rich and successful, the next stage becomes interesting. My son Seneca, shall become the next prince and king of Los Angeles. He is already to go here in Culver City, there’s no other kid who was born in 2021 who is as tall funny handsome, strong muscular good-looking, and sociable than him. Shout out to my friends Noel Lisa and Ray, and especially Kevin! Everyone knows me in Seneca now here in Culver City, and I am excited to see him go through the Culver City school system, before he goes off and becomes the next great entrepreneur.

Why bitcoin is the best investment right now

So I was reading pumping iron by this one author, and he’s writing this in 1980… Wow, that is almost 44 years ago… He talks about how Arnold Schwarzenegger purchased a $700,000 home in Santa Monica at the time, which I am certain that adjusted for inflation might’ve been close to what we imagine $10 million to be today.

Anyways, I was thinking about… If I was in a Time Machine in the 1980s, or specifically 1980… When Arnold Schwarzenegger was already 34 years old, I’m 36 years old right now. If that were the case, what kind of investment could you make for $700,000 at a time, that would yield a superior return, from 1980 to 2024?

At the time, I think the only real investment you could’ve made in was real estate, commercial real estate, maybe residential real estate. If you bought a bunch of property in Culver City, or Palos Verdes, back then knowing what we know now… You would have become a billionaire many times over. Because currently looking at the whole market here in LA… It all sucks besides Culver City.  Santa Monica used to be the best spot to be, but now it is overrun with homeless people, people high on crack etc. Even if I was a billionaire today, I would not want to live in Santa Monica because it is super dirty, still too many homeless people etc. Even worse point to creatine, oh my God, all the homeless encampment, and homeless people around… And the pollution, insanely terrible.

Anyways, I think the hard thing is when it comes to investments, most people can only think by analogies, metaphors, or similarities to the past. Much more difficult to think carte blache, first principles, because it is difficult to predict or anticipate that which has not yet happened.  Life is not like back to the future, in which you could predict everything with 100% perfect foresight!

But also… Even if things were like back to the future and even if you could predict things with 100% clarity, it might not always be a desired outcome. Why? Sometimes a problem can be that even if you get what you wish, it could positively be a bad thing.

For example, a lot of things end up becoming dangerous liabilities. For example if you want to go to the Inglewood public library, or Ladera Heights or whatever… Can you pull up in a Lamborghini, you might get robbed at gunpoint, you might even die! I suppose the upside of driving a beat up 2010 Prius is that it is the ultimate stealth car, nobody in real life knows how rich I am because I look like a poor person.

Look poor, think rich – Andy Warhol

Los Angeles becomes very interesting to me because it really is the center of the universe. Now that Apple is here, there’s really no reason to be anywhere else.

Only that but Apple having that grand downtown LA theater store, so beautiful! Even though I am critical of a lot of things of Apple… Apple isn’t going away anytime soon, at least in the lifetime of myself or Seneca. Maybe the returns and the profits of Apple will not be as impressive into the future, much better to buy bitcoin or microstrategy stock instead,  but still, for the most part Apple is the most practical strategy.

Until a competitor, whether it be open AI, Microsoft, Nvidia or somebody else who makes a really really good ChatGPT-first phone, Apple will still have the dominant market here. 

The true disruptor

After playing with a new iPhone Pro a bit, essentially when my ultimate Takeaway point is the only reason to have an iPhone now is because you just need something to run ChatGPT. Unfortunately at the moment, you cannot run ChatGPT without an iPhone or iPad or your laptop. And even Google Gemini sucks. I rate ChatGPT as 1 trillion times better.

And Apple Intelligence, I’ve been playing with it, and even me, the ultimate text nerd and advocate, even though I have no idea what Apple Intelligence is and how it is different from Siri? I think honestly it just seems like a rebranding of Siri, Which is confusing for everybody.

Once you’re a bitcoin billionaire, then what?

When people ask me what I do, I often joke and I just say that I’m a bitcoin billionaire. But I almost say it half tongue and cheek, half true. I’m very certain that my bitcoin holdings well only 10 X 100 X or 1000 X from here.

According to my aggressive calculations, my bitcoin should be worth at least $500B 30 years from now. It will be worth at least 1.2 billion, 15 years from now. 

Assuming that you perfect for side of the future, then how do you proceed in life?

Autotelic progressions

So the very very basic notion is moving forward, it could all just be autotelic! Which means you just do things for the sake of it, because it personally interests you, not because there is necessarily some sort of phenomenal payoff to it.

Because once again… Once you live in a world that money no longer concerns you, then what?

I’m the judge!

Pursue play & fun?

Only anger, fury, wrath and sadness?

Yall my clones

—> don’t be a clone!

Soulja Slim, born James Adarryl Tapp Jr., was a significant figure in New Orleans’ hip-hop scene. He was known for his raw, street-oriented style, which resonated with many due to his firsthand experiences growing up in the Magnolia Projects. Slim gained early recognition with his debut album Give It 2 ’Em Raw under No Limit Records in 1998, followed by several other releases. His most notable contribution to mainstream music came with Juvenile’s chart-topping hit “Slow Motion,” which featured Slim and reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100 posthumously in 2004.

Unfortunately, Soulja Slim’s promising career was tragically cut short when he was murdered outside his mother’s home in New Orleans on November 26, 2003. Although his killer, Garelle Smith, was arrested, the case became cold due to lack of witnesses, and Smith himself was later found dead in 2011. Despite his death, Slim’s influence remains strong, especially through his son, Lil Soulja Slim, who continues to carry on his legacy in music   .

In recent years, artists like B.G. have honored Soulja Slim’s memory, celebrating his legacy on his birthdays and emphasizing the impact he would have had on hip-hop if he were still alive . His music remains an enduring part of New Orleans’ cultural landscape, particularly in the stories of struggle and survival he shared through his lyrics.

giant, gigas. Gigantes

GIGAS

midge— small flying insect. Very small.

…

Certainly! Let’s delve into the etymology of the words “giant” and “midget,” focusing on their Latin and Greek origins.

1. Giant

Origin and Etymology:

• Ancient Greek:

• The word “giant” originates from the Ancient Greek word “γίγας” (gígas), which means “giant.”

• This term is famously associated with the “Gigantes,” a race of great beings in Greek mythology who waged war against the Olympian gods in a conflict known as the Gigantomachy.

• Latin:

• The Greek “Gigantes” was adopted into Latin as “gigantes,” maintaining both the meaning and the mythological context.

• Latin forms like “gigantus” were used to describe something of enormous size or strength.

• Old French and Middle English:

• From Latin, the term passed into Old French as “geant,” and subsequently into Middle English as “giant.”

• Modern English:

• In contemporary usage, “giant” refers to something of enormous size or power. It retains its mythological connotations in literature and folklore, often symbolizing formidable strength or challenges.

Summary:

• Greek: γίγας (gígas) → Latin: gigantes → Old French: geant → English: giant

2. Midget

Origin and Etymology:

• English:

• The term “midget” is significantly more recent compared to “giant” and does not have direct roots in Latin or Greek.

• It is believed to have been coined in the late 19th century as a variant of “midge,” which refers to a small flying insect. The suffix ”-et” is a diminutive, thus “midget” implies something very small.

• Possible Influences:

• While “midget” itself doesn’t derive directly from Latin or Greek, it’s influenced by the English word “midge,” which comes from the Old English “mycg,” meaning a small fly.

• Usage and Connotations:

• Historically, “midget” was used to describe a person of unusually small stature. However, it’s important to note that the term is now considered offensive and outdated. Modern and respectful terms include “little person,” “person of short stature,” or referring to specific medical conditions like dwarfism.

Summary:

• English Origin: midge (Old English “mycg”) + diminutive suffix “-et” → “midget”

Comparison and Linguistic Context

• “Giant” has deep roots in Ancient Greek and was transmitted through Latin into English, carrying rich mythological and cultural significance.

• “Midget,” on the other hand, is a modern English coinage without direct ties to Latin or Greek etymology. Its formation is based on English linguistic elements rather than classical languages.

Cultural and Social Considerations

• While exploring etymology is fascinating, it’s also crucial to be aware of the social implications of certain terms. As mentioned, “midget” is now considered derogatory. Language evolves, and sensitivity to such changes is important for respectful communication.

If you have any more questions about etymology or related topics, feel free to ask!