Certainly, here are some of the most frequently cited quotes from the Climategate emails, along with their context and clarifications:
1. “Hide the declineâ€
• Context: This phrase appeared in an email discussing the discrepancy between tree ring data and temperature measurements in the late 20th century.
• Clarification: “The decline†refers to a known issue where certain proxy data (like tree rings) diverged from actual temperature measurements. Scientists were discussing how to present this information accurately in graphs, not hiding data.
2. “Trickâ€
• Context: The term was used in reference to graphically representing data.
• Clarification: The phrase “trick†was used informally to describe a method of presenting complex data clearly. It was not intended to imply deception.
3. “Use the word ‘principal component’â€
• Context: Scientists were discussing statistical methods to analyze climate data.
• Clarification: This was a technical discussion about data analysis techniques, not related to misleading the public.
4. “Brian’s strange trickâ€
• Context: Referring to a colleague’s method for data analysis.
• Clarification: Again, “trick†was used in the sense of a technique or method, not deceit.
5. “We have to get the papers accepted before Copenhagenâ€
• Context: Planning the publication of research findings before an important climate conference.
• Clarification: This reflects the urgency to share scientific findings timely and does not indicate any manipulation of data.
Important Notes:
• Investigations: Multiple independent investigations concluded that there was no evidence of data manipulation or scientific misconduct. The language used in the emails was often informal and taken out of context.
• Scientific Consensus: The overarching scientific consensus on climate change remains robust, supported by extensive research and data beyond the scope of these emails.
• Transparency: The incident highlighted the need for clearer communication in scientific discourse, especially when dealing with complex and sensitive topics like climate change.
If you have specific quotes you’d like more information on or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
xx
Here are a few of the commonly cited quotes from the Climategate emails, along with some context:
1. “Hide the declineâ€
• Quote: In an email from Phil Jones to other scientists, he mentioned using a “trick†to “hide the decline.â€
• Context: This was one of the most controversial phrases. The phrase refers to a specific statistical technique used in a graph to combine tree ring data and temperature data. Some tree ring data after 1960 showed a divergence from actual recorded temperatures (a well-known phenomenon in climate science called the “divergence problemâ€), and the term “hide the decline†was referring to the removal of that post-1960 tree ring data in favor of actual temperature records to present a more accurate temperature trend. The use of the word “trick†here is commonly used in scientific contexts to describe a clever technique or method, rather than deception.
2. “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trickâ€
• Quote: Phil Jones wrote, “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.â€
• Context: This email was referring to a method used by climate scientist Michael Mann, who had published a technique in Nature to combine tree ring proxy data with actual temperature records. The word “trick†again referred to a method for improving the accuracy of a graph, not to hide data or manipulate findings. “Hide the decline†specifically referred to the post-1960 period where tree ring data was less reliable, so they incorporated actual temperature data to better reflect reality.
3. “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.â€
• Quote: Kevin Trenberth wrote, “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.â€
• Context: This was part of an email from Kevin Trenberth discussing gaps in understanding short-term climate variability. He was acknowledging a scientific challenge in explaining short-term fluctuations in warming, not denying global warming. Trenberth later clarified that he was referring to limitations in the observational data and the need for improved climate models to understand short-term variability in climate patterns.
4. “We’ll keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!â€
• Quote: Phil Jones wrote, “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!â€
• Context: In this email, Jones was frustrated with papers he saw as flawed or misrepresenting climate science. This quote was cited by critics as evidence of an attempt to stifle dissenting views in climate science. However, Jones and other scientists pointed out that they were discussing ensuring that credible, peer-reviewed research be included in IPCC reports and had no control over journal editorial decisions. This comment was viewed as an example of frustration within the scientific community but didn’t constitute actual censorship.
5. “This was the moment when the temperature records from the stations in China became really dubious.â€
• Quote: In another email, Jones expressed concerns about the quality of temperature data from China.
• Context: This email reflects internal concerns among scientists about data quality, something common in scientific research. It wasn’t evidence of falsifying or adjusting data, but rather a discussion of where data might be less reliable and where scientists needed to be cautious about drawing conclusions.
Each of these quotes, when taken out of context, seemed to suggest manipulation or unethical behavior. However, multiple investigations found that while the language was sometimes informal or careless, the emails did not reveal evidence of systematic fraud or misconduct. The quotes illustrate the complexities and challenges of climate science but do not undermine the broader consensus on climate change.
xxx
It seems like you’re referring to the “Climategate†incident of 2009, not directly related to An Inconvenient Truth, the 2006 climate change documentary by Al Gore. This incident involved a set of emails that were leaked from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) in the United Kingdom.
Here’s a brief overview of what happened with Climategate:
What was “Climategate�
In November 2009, hackers obtained over a thousand emails and documents from the CRU servers. These emails were between climate scientists and covered a range of topics, including research methods, data interpretation, and discussions on how to present findings in the context of climate change. The timing of the leak was significant, as it occurred shortly before the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.
Why were the emails controversial?
Certain quotes from these emails were taken out of context and used by climate change skeptics to suggest that scientists were manipulating data to make climate change appear more severe than it actually was. Key phrases, such as “hide the decline†and “trick,†were often cited as evidence of supposed data tampering. However, investigations later clarified that these phrases were scientific jargon, and the emails, though sometimes poorly worded, did not indicate fraudulent practices.
Investigations and Findings
Multiple independent investigations, including those by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, examined the emails. These investigations largely cleared the scientists of any wrongdoing, concluding that while some of the emails revealed frustration and poor communication, they did not provide evidence of scientific misconduct or data manipulation. The investigations confirmed that the consensus on climate change science was still robust and valid.
Connection to An Inconvenient Truth
While the Climategate emails became a tool for climate change skeptics to criticize the scientific consensus on climate change, there is no direct connection between the emails and An Inconvenient Truth. The documentary had already been out for three years when the emails were leaked. The controversy, however, did provide fuel for critics of climate action, who used it to question the validity of the climate science that underpinned much of the messaging in the documentary.
The Climategate incident underscored the importance of transparency in scientific communication and the risks of taking scientific jargon out of context.

