I believe the real problematic things here are that everyone wants to turn their ethics into categorical imperative which means that my ethics are right and supreme for all, and cannot be diluted by anybody else.
The reason why this is not a good line of thinking is that it does not permit for subtleties, nuances, differences. For example, the ethics of a Middle Eastern woman in Baghdad will probably be very different from the ethics of a 36-year-old Korean American man living in Los Angeles.
More robust ethics.
I believe that the difficulty when it comes to ethics is that to always create new ethics or different code of ethics or a different approach based on the situation at hand, it’s not only time and energy intensive, it is also very very unethical in some ways. Why? The critical issue in today’s world is that we are all still chained by the traditional laws of ethics in the realm of traditional Judeo-Christian morals ethics and morality. As a consequence, our morals and ethics becomes classified, boring, same same.
Building a more dynamic, better code of ethics.
Facts!