Moving forward ,,, reduce driving to an absolute minimum?

Could you hire foreign mercenaries to fight in bitcoin

Physique of a warrior— a physique fit for war! Hand to hand combat!

What types of exercises are actually beneficial to and for war?

tasso— to arrange.

Taktikos— for war.

Tegh— to touch.

*kap— gehb — to grab

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kap-

Evolution

The evolution of the word “fight” from its earliest forms to modern English showcases a fascinating linguistic journey:

1. Proto-Indo-European Roots: The earliest root likely comes from the Proto-Indo-European language, with the suggested roots being “pek-“, “puk-“, or “*peuk-“. These roots convey meanings related to pulling or plucking, hinting at a physical struggle.
2. Proto-Germanic Development: From Proto-Indo-European, the word evolved into Proto-Germanic as “*fehtan.” This term more directly refers to fighting or combat.
3. Old English: In Old English, the word became “feohtan,” which directly means “to fight, combat, or strive.” This form is very close to the modern usage and shows a clear focus on physical confrontation.
4. Middle English: The term evolved into “fighten” in Middle English, a period when the English language underwent significant changes due to Norman influence and the simplification of grammar and pronunciation.
5. Modern English: Eventually, the word settled into the modern English form “fight.” The meaning broadened beyond physical confrontations to include any form of struggle or contest, whether literal or metaphorical.

Throughout its evolution, the essence of the word “fight” as a form of struggle or contest has remained consistent, even as its pronunciation and spelling have changed.

To pluck, to pull —physical struggle

The etymology of the word “fight” reveals its evolution through multiple languages before arriving at its current form in English. The word “fight” originates from the Old English “feohtan,” which meant “to fight, combat, strive.” This Old English term is derived from the Proto-Germanic “*fehtan,” which has parallels in other Germanic languages, such as Old High German “fehtan” (to fight) and Old Norse “fekta” (to fight, fence).

Going further back, the Proto-Germanic “fehtan” is thought to be linked to the Proto-Indo-European root “pek-“, “puk-“, or “peuk-“, which carries the meaning of “to pluck” or “to pull” – suggesting a physical struggle or pulling at each other.

Over the centuries, the word evolved in Middle English to “fighten,” and eventually to the modern English “fight.” Throughout its history, the word has retained its core meaning related to physical struggle and combat.

Capio— to seize.

From re- +‎ capiō (“take, seize”

Restore to health

Take hold again

In Military

In a military context, “recovery” has specific and diverse meanings, often related to regaining strength, position, or resources after a setback or in the course of operations. Here are some of the ways it’s used:

1. Personnel Recovery: This involves the process of searching for, locating, identifying, and returning military personnel, particularly in scenarios where they are missing, isolated, or captured. It’s a critical aspect of military operations, ensuring no soldier is left behind.
2. Equipment and Vehicle Recovery: This refers to the retrieval and repair of damaged or disabled equipment and vehicles during or after a mission. This can include anything from small arms to large vehicles and aircraft.
3. Data Recovery: In modern warfare, recovering electronic data, such as intelligence or communications intercepted or lost during operations, is increasingly important.
4. Terrain Recovery: This might involve regaining control of territory that was lost to the enemy or re-establishing a position.
5. Resource Recovery: This could be about replenishing supplies, ammunition, fuel, or other resources that have been depleted in the course of military actions.
6. Physical and Psychological Recovery: Post-combat, this involves the rehabilitation of soldiers who may have physical injuries or psychological trauma.

In each of these contexts, “recovery” maintains its core meaning of regaining or returning to a former state, but it’s applied in specific ways that are crucial to military operations and the well-being of personnel.

The etymology of the word “recovery” is quite interesting. It traces back to the Latin word “recuperare,” which means “to get again, regain, recover.” This Latin term stems from “re-” meaning “back” and “cupere,” which is related to the desire to take or hold. Over time, the word evolved through Old French into Middle English as “recoverie,” which retained the sense of regaining or getting back something that was lost or taken away.

Thus, the original sense of recovery involves a return to a previous state or condition, often after a loss or hardship. This meaning is still very much alive in the way we use the word today, such as recovering health after an illness or regaining possession of something.

No. Freedom is degrees —

First do no harm unto others

Why not sprint or walk instead?

Bitcoin.la

Black don’t Crack , and also I want to look like the terminator

To actually get sick every once in a while, if long-term health is your goal is desirable

Skilled vs unskilled labor

Never return it

Gen x vs Millenial debt

When comparing the debt levels of Generation X and Millennials, there are some notable differences, largely influenced by the economic contexts each generation faced during their formative years and early adulthood.

1. Generation X Debt: Generation X, typically defined as those born between 1965 and 1980, carries the most consumer debt out of any generation. As of 2022, the average debt for Generation X was about $140,643. This higher level of debt can be attributed to several factors, including that many in this generation are in their peak earning years, are more likely to own homes (hence, higher mortgage debt), and may also be managing costs related to raising children and caring for aging parents. Additionally, this generation was heavily impacted by the Great Recession, which may have influenced their debt accumulation patterns.
2. Millennial Debt: Millennials, born between 1981 and 1996, have shown a significant increase in debt over recent years. However, their total debt is generally lower than that of Generation X. One of the defining characteristics of Millennial debt is the substantial amount of student loan debt, as this generation has pursued higher education in large numbers and faced soaring tuition costs. Besides student loans, Millennials also carry credit card, auto loan, and mortgage debt, but the amounts are generally lower compared to Gen X, partially due to their stage in life (e.g., entering or in the middle of their career, starting families, buying homes).
3. Contextual Factors: The economic environment each generation faced during their formative years has greatly influenced their attitudes towards debt and financial management. Gen X experienced the economic prosperity of the 1990s and early 2000s, while Millennials entered adulthood during the Great Recession, which has shaped their financial behaviors and circumstances.
4. Real Estate and Education: The types of debt also differ between these generations. Gen X is more likely to have higher mortgage debt due to longer homeownership, while Millennials are characterized by higher education-related debt.
5. Income and Spending Patterns: Income levels and spending habits also play a role. Gen X, being older, typically has higher incomes and more financial responsibilities, which can lead to higher debt levels. Millennials, on the other hand, have been cautious with their spending and credit use, partly influenced by the economic challenges they faced early in their careers.

Overall, while both generations face debt challenges, the nature and extent of their debt differ due to various factors, including economic conditions during key life stages, types of debt incurred, and their respective responses to financial pressures oai_citation:1,Debt In America: Statistics and Demographics oai_citation:2,Consumer Debt Statistics & Demographics in U.S. [January 2022].

Average consumer debt — $92,727 per person.

Student loans — 58k

Auto loans — $30k

Credit card debt

1.079 trillion??

***

Debt & obligation

During COVID ,,, how many fools just used the stimulus checks to buy stuff, instead of paying off their debt?

Difficult to increase your income, easy to reduce your expenses and expenditures.

limbo

diminish your debt, don’t increase your income.

Percentage Americans in debt, and also LA

$16.52 trillion in debt???

As of late 2023, the United States has been grappling with significant levels of debt across various categories. The total consumer debt in the U.S. reached approximately $16.51 trillion by the third quarter of 2022, with average consumer debt per individual standing at around $92,727. This debt encompasses various forms, including auto loans, credit card debt, mortgages, and student loans. Notably, auto and student loans have seen a substantial increase since the Great Recession. For instance, the typical American household had over $58,000 in student loan debt and about $30,000 in auto loans.

Credit card debt, in particular, has been a significant concern. Americans’ total credit card balance amounted to $1.079 trillion in the third quarter of 2023. This figure represents a substantial increase over the previous years, indicating a rising trend in credit card usage and the associated debt.

Debt levels also vary significantly based on demographic factors such as age, income, education, and family type. For example, younger age groups, especially those between 18-29 years old, have been accumulating debt more rapidly, especially in forms like credit card and auto loans. Meanwhile, Generation X carries the highest average consumer debt among all generations. Education level also plays a role, with higher education levels correlating with higher consumer debt balances.

In terms of income, those at the lower end of the income spectrum tend to allocate a larger percentage of their income towards debt repayment. This dynamic underscores the more significant financial strain experienced by lower-income households in managing debt.

Additionally, having children can increase the likelihood of debt. Families with children typically have higher total debt than the national average, with the number of children correlating with the amount of debt, particularly in categories like credit cards and auto loans.

Debt also varies by race, with different racial groups experiencing varying degrees of debt accumulation and access to credit. Black and Hispanic borrowers, for instance, generally have lower credit scores and more limited borrowing options compared to white consumers.

The impact of debt is not just financial but also emotional, with a significant percentage of Americans reporting stress related to their debt levels.

These figures provide a snapshot of the complex and multifaceted nature of debt in America, highlighting the challenges many individuals face in managing their financial obligations oai_citation:1,Debt In America: Statistics and Demographics oai_citation:2,2024 Credit Card Debt Statistics | LendingTree oai_citation:3,Consumer Debt Statistics & Demographics in U.S. [January 2022].

When to reduce, when to increase rents?

Benefit of his people’s?

royal income?

debts?

False ratio and proportions?

Rent

Rendita… return, rendere— yield, give back, render.

The terms “Ramnes,” “Tities,” and “Luceres” refer to the three traditional tribes that made up the early Roman population, according to Roman legend. These tribes were supposedly established by Romulus, the legendary founder of Rome.

1. Ramnes: This tribe was named after Romulus himself. They were believed to be the first tribe and consisted of Latins, representing the original inhabitants of the area where Rome was founded.
2. Tities: Named after Titus Tatius, the Sabine king, this tribe is said to have consisted of Sabines. The Sabines were an Italic tribe that played a significant role in the early history of Rome. According to legend, Romulus invited the Sabines to a festival and then abducted their women, leading to a merger of the two peoples.
3. Luceres: This tribe is thought to have been made up of Etruscans, another important Italic civilization. The Etruscans were known for their advanced culture and were influential in the development of Roman civilization.

These three tribes were central to the early social and military organization of Rome. Each tribe was divided into ten curiae, and each curia provided a certain number of soldiers to the army. This tripartite division was fundamental in the early Roman kingdom and influenced later Roman administrative and military structures. However, it’s important to note that much of the early history of Rome is steeped in myth and legend, so the historical accuracy of these tribes is subject to debate.

The public revenue is nothing but tributes — tribute = tribe. Tribus, 3?

tribus f (genitive tribÅ«s); fourth declension

1. One of the three original tribes of Rome: Ramnes, Tities, Luceres.
2. A division of the Roman people.

Augmentation of the currency is inprofitable. — “payments”?

”tributes”?

Science of money

Collect income? Debased money: perhaps the reason why rent prices are going higher is because the money (COVID “stimulus checks”) are now debased?

Davanzati believed he had demonstrated that upon raising the value of the currency, the powers of private individuals and\even the public income fall, because what princes gain once from debasement
they lose every time they collect their income in de­ basedmoney.

Gratis is Bad.

Water is
not only useful but necessary, yet to a Tnan with drop­ sy it is insalubrious and- lethal. In other words, the utility of a thing is measured principally by its use and by the circumstances under which it is used.

Utility, disutility

False harms

False utilities —

according to what John Locke has said: this
resembles the resolution of that madman who used to boil guattrini**”® in a pot in order to cause them to
grow. Enoughsaidoffalseutilities.

“Quattrini” is an Italian term that refers to money, specifically small denominations of currency or coins. It’s a somewhat colloquial term, akin to saying “bucks” or “quid” in English. The word comes from the Italian “quattro,” meaning four, indicating a small amount or something insignificant in terms of value. In historical contexts, it referred to actual coins, but in modern usage, it’s more about the concept of money in general, especially in smaller amounts.

From a philosophical perspective, the term reflects how language and culture shape our understanding of value and currency. While it’s a practical term in everyday Italian, it also carries nuances about the perceived worth of money and how that changes over time and across different cultures. For someone interested in philosophy and innovation, this concept could be a starting point for exploring how language influences our perception of economic value and how such perceptions evolve.

Using what you already got instead of buying *new* stuff?

Stop buying new products?

Boxer briefs to just normal briefs? Less material!

Notes easy to counterfeit

Good vs bad coins — impoverish the state or not?

Good vs Bad Money ***

Plentiful and legal?

Great love and esteem

Change all the blood in the human body?

---

ALL THE POWER IN THE WORLD?

once you got all the power in the world… Then what?

For myself, the only real power is physiological power? 

Great & flourishing

Abused?

Prohibit the circulation of old bad coins

“Pragmatic”

Remove old coins from circulation ***

Sports is a scam?

Groaning & wailing

Power & faith

Rebel?

The art of commanding

Mutilated money

Die of hunger?

---

Why care so much for the poor, and impoverished?

Merchandise

New coins, stamped.

Created by the scissors?

How to augment prices?

Infidelity?

Reinforce

slowness

when used with re­ spect to money, auginentation of the currency denotes a profit which the prince and the state enjoy because of the slowness with which th^ aJuJtitudes change the rela­tionship between the prices of things and of money.

Profit, slowness?

Nominal = name.

*

Ducats & food

Ducat

.

Delay in changing prices

True needs of a virtuous prince?

“Alleged utility”

Augmentation of the money does not multiply the wealth of the prince.

Augmenting money doesn’t multiply your wealth?

.

Height, augmenting height?

*

becoming richer is reducing expenses?

Quattrini

.

Vigor?

A totally radically new concept?

For example,,, for men’s shorts, pants, leggings or something?

Tactical short —

1. Zippers too tight. Lululemon license to train zippers 1000x better.
2. The drawstring in the front is waaaaay too long, and too thick.
3. The fit is a bit weird? Medium is too loose and baggy? Medium for lululemon seems on point for men shorts — license to train.
4. Also,,, for some reason with these shorts your crotch pops up? Whereas the lululemon license to train ones don’t?

Suggestions

1. Are the zippers YKK? Loosen them up a bit.
2. Reduce the length of front drawstring, and lighten the fabric.

For example Loop Returns– via tenthousand.cc—

Why is it so damn difficult, annoying, hidden to just return an item, for a full refund?

These annoying ass “fake” hidden buttons … I’m a tech whiz and I can barely see the return buttons?

But in my own weird unique way?

Our clothes might matter *more* than our phones, our cars?

Also,,, it looks like I just buy things for the marketing?

Maybe a 28mm?

How to Shoot Street Photography with a 28mm Lens

For example current life here in Culver City [arts district];; I’m 1000x happier than I was in the burbs, (suburbs)– even though currently my health ain’t super great! (mild-small case of COVID).

Lady Gaga only 5 foot 1???

Beautiful people:

Kim Kardashian is reported to be 5 feet 2 inches tall, or 1.57 meters. This information is consistent across various sources, including Who What Wear and Capital XTRA. Her height is often noted due to her prominence in the public eye and the interest in celebrity physical characteristics oai_citation:1,Here’s How Tall All the Kardashians Are | Who What Wear oai_citation:2,How Tall Are The Kardashian Family? Kardashian Heights in Feet & Metres – Capital XTRA.

Kim k height

Bodyfat

The average body fat percentage can vary widely among individuals, influenced by factors like age, gender, and fitness level. Generally, the averages in the United States are:

• For men, an average body fat percentage is typically between 18% to 24%.
• For women, it’s slightly higher, usually ranging from 25% to 31%.

These are average ranges and can vary. Athletes and fitness enthusiasts often have lower body fat percentages due to higher muscle mass. It’s important to note that both very low and very high body fat percentages can have health implications.

Weight

In the United States, the average weights for adults are as follows:

• Average weight for males: about 197.9 pounds (89.8 kg)
• Average weight for females: about 170.6 pounds (77.4 kg)

These figures are based on data from sources like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and represent averages across a diverse population. Individual weights can vary greatly due to factors like height, age, muscle mass, bone density, and overall health.

In the United States, the average heights are slightly different from the global averages:

• Average male height: about 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm)
• Average female height: about 5 feet 4 inches (163 cm)

These are averages, so individual heights can vary widely. Factors like genetics, nutrition, and lifestyle play significant roles in determining height.

In the realms of rap and R&B, several short women have made significant contributions and gained widespread recognition for their talents. Here are some prominent examples:

1. Nicki Minaj (5’2″ / 157 cm) – A highly influential rapper, singer, and songwriter known for her versatile style, unique voice, and hit songs like “Super Bass” and “Starships.”
2. Lil’ Kim (4’11” / 150 cm) – A groundbreaking rapper known for her distinctive delivery and hits like “Crush on You” and “Lady Marmalade.”
3. Erykah Badu (5’0″ / 152 cm) – A singer-songwriter often regarded as the “Queen of Neo-Soul,” famous for songs like “On & On” and “Bag Lady.”
4. Kehlani (5’4″ / 163 cm) – An R&B singer and songwriter known for her emotional honesty and hits like “Gangsta” and “Honey.”

These artists have made notable impacts in their genres, blending unique styles and powerful messages in their music, proving that talent and influence are not contingent on physical stature.

In the entertainment industry, several short women have achieved remarkable success and fame. Here are some notable examples:

1. Reese Witherspoon (5’1″ / 155 cm) – An award-winning actress and producer known for her roles in “Legally Blonde,” “Walk the Line,” and “Big Little Lies.”
2. Kristen Bell (5’1″ / 155 cm) – An actress and singer famous for her roles in “Veronica Mars,” “Frozen,” and “The Good Place.”
3. Natalie Portman (5’3″ / 160 cm) – An Oscar-winning actress known for her roles in “Black Swan,” “V for Vendetta,” and the “Star Wars” prequel trilogy.
4. Scarlett Johansson (5’3″ / 160 cm) – A highly successful actress and singer, known for her roles in “Lost in Translation,” “The Avengers,” and “Marriage Story.”
5. Salma Hayek (5’2″ / 157 cm) – An actress and producer renowned for her performances in “Frida,” “Desperado,” and “From Dusk Till Dawn.”

These women have made significant contributions to the entertainment industry, showcasing their immense talent and versatility across various roles and genres. Their stature has never been a limitation to their success and influence in the world of entertainment.

Famous short women have made significant impacts in various fields, showcasing that height is not a barrier to achieving greatness. Here are a few notable examples:

1. Mother Teresa (5’0″ / 152 cm) – A Nobel Peace Prize laureate known for her humanitarian work and the founding of the Missionaries of Charity.
2. Judy Garland (4’11” / 150 cm) – An iconic actress and singer, celebrated for her role as Dorothy in “The Wizard of Oz.”
3. Simone Biles (4’8″ / 142 cm) – One of the most decorated gymnasts in history, known for her extraordinary athletic abilities.
4. Lady Gaga (5’1″ / 155 cm) – A highly influential pop star and actress, recognized for her musical talent and fashion statements.
5. Ariana Grande (5’0″ / 152 cm) – A successful singer and actress, known for her powerful voice and presence in the music industry.

These women demonstrate that height is just a number and it’s their talent, determination, and influence that truly make them stand tall in history.

Short stature has certainly not been a barrier to success for many entrepreneurs. Here are some notable entrepreneurs who are known to be on the shorter side:

1. Mark Zuckerberg – The co-founder and CEO of Facebook, Zuckerberg is reported to be around 5’7″ (170 cm).
2. Jeff Bezos – Founder of Amazon, one of the world’s largest and most successful online retail platforms, Bezos is around 5’7″ (170 cm).
3. Kevin O’Leary – A prominent figure on the TV show “Shark Tank,” and an entrepreneur known for his software company SoftKey, O’Leary is about 5’9″ (175 cm), which is slightly below average for men in the U.S.
4. Daymond John – Another “Shark Tank” investor and the founder of FUBU, John is around 5’7″ (170 cm).
5. Daniel Ek – The co-founder and CEO of Spotify, Ek is reportedly around 5’8″ (173 cm).

These entrepreneurs have demonstrated that success in the business world is not dependent on height but rather on vision, innovation, and determination. Their achievements in various industries serve as inspiration to aspiring entrepreneurs worldwide.

Short stature has certainly not been a barrier to success for many entrepreneurs. Here are some notable entrepreneurs who are known to be on the shorter side:

1. Mark Zuckerberg – The co-founder and CEO of Facebook, Zuckerberg is reported to be around 5’7″ (170 cm).
2. Jeff Bezos – Founder of Amazon, one of the world’s largest and most successful online retail platforms, Bezos is around 5’7″ (170 cm).
3. Kevin O’Leary – A prominent figure on the TV show “Shark Tank,” and an entrepreneur known for his software company SoftKey, O’Leary is about 5’9″ (175 cm), which is slightly below average for men in the U.S.
4. Daymond John – Another “Shark Tank” investor and the founder of FUBU, John is around 5’7″ (170 cm).
5. Daniel Ek – The co-founder and CEO of Spotify, Ek is reportedly around 5’8″ (173 cm).

These entrepreneurs have demonstrated that success in the business world is not dependent on height but rather on vision, innovation, and determination. Their achievements in various industries serve as inspiration to aspiring entrepreneurs worldwide.

And rappers

In addition to the actors previously mentioned, here are more famous short male actors and also some notable short male rappers:

Actors:

6. Elijah Wood – Known for his role as Frodo in “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy, Wood is around 5’6″ (168 cm).
7. Martin Freeman – Another “The Hobbit” series star, Freeman, who played Bilbo Baggins, is about 5’6″ (168 cm).
8. Ben Stiller – A renowned actor and comedian, Stiller, known for movies like “Zoolander,” is about 5’7″ (170 cm).
9. Seth Green – Known for his work in “Austin Powers” and “Family Guy,” Green stands at about 5’4″ (163 cm).
10. Peter Dinklage – Famous for his role in “Game of Thrones,” Dinklage, who is 4’5″ (135 cm), has significantly impacted the industry, especially for actors with dwarfism.

Rappers:

1. Lil Wayne – At around 5’5″ (165 cm), he is one of the most influential and successful rappers in the industry.
2. Eminem – Standing at about 5’8″ (173 cm), Eminem is often considered on the shorter side in the industry but is one of the best-selling artists of all time.
3. Kendrick Lamar – Approximately 5’6″ (168 cm), Lamar is highly acclaimed for his lyrical skill and innovative music.
4. T.I. – At about 5’8″ (173 cm), T.I. is known for his Southern hip-hop style and successful music career.
5. Big Boi – One half of the iconic duo OutKast, Big Boi is around 5’6″ (168 cm).

These individuals have shown that talent and influence in the entertainment industry aren’t determined by physical stature. They’ve each made significant impacts in their respective fields.

There are many famous short male actors who have made significant impacts in the film and television industry. Here are a few notable ones:

1. Daniel Radcliffe – Best known for his role as Harry Potter, Radcliffe is around 5’5″ (165 cm). His career has spanned various genres, showcasing his versatility.
2. Tom Cruise – Despite being around 5’7″ (170 cm), Cruise is one of the most successful actors in Hollywood, known for his roles in action films like the “Mission: Impossible” series.
3. Al Pacino – Standing at about 5’7″ (170 cm), Pacino is a legendary actor known for his roles in classics like “The Godfather” and “Scarface.”
4. Joe Pesci – At around 5’4″ (163 cm), Pesci has had a storied career with memorable roles in films like “Goodfellas” and “Casino.”
5. Michael J. Fox – Famous for his roles in “Back to the Future” and “Family Ties,” Fox is around 5’4″ (163 cm). He’s also known for his advocacy work in Parkinson’s disease research.

These actors have proven that talent and screen presence can overshadow any concerns about height in the film industry.

the two trading partners who enter a contract,

Consensus

Conscience is true inner ethics — shame is socialized?

For example, we don’t really care to spend $3 million on a house or money on a car — yes we are very averse to small expenses?

Happiness is free!

https://erickimphotography.com/blog

Happy Vlog

–

Even though you’re dumb rich!