Author: admin

  • The world is covered with splinters, but I suppose you have the option to put on shoes that cover your toes

    So there’s this Zen Taoist principle –>

    the world is covered with thorns, but you have the option of putting on sandals.

    The general idea is that in the world, it’s like almost impossible to navigate all of it, without any sort of downside. It is both necessary and also inevitable.

    Then suppose the nuance is trying to think and consider that, what if actually… Not only is it necessary but it is also positively desirable? 

    no thorns no joy or glory

    So the unorthodox thought is in regards to thinking about and considering upside without downsides etc.

    I think a lot of people desire upside without downsides, which is intelligent but, from a physics perspective impossible?

    For example, let us say that you want to maximize your hedonic sexual pleasure. Technically if you want to do that, long periods of abstinence followed by activity is actually better than the boredom and monotony daily predictability?

    I think it’s also the logic of gambling or the lottery. The general idea is that, people get a thrill because it is unpredictable. Perhaps the same thing with sports. Or sports betting.

    why do we want to strip the volatility away from everything?

    So what instead, the actual goal is to add volatility and maximize velocity and volatility? This is the whole underlying ethos or philosophy or concept behind bitcoin, MSTR strategy, Meta planet etc. A very very simple yet paradigm shifting idea,–>

    more volatility is better.

    When we try to strip away the volatility from everything, life becomes boring same thing, uninteresting? 

    ERIC


  • iPhone 17 Pro Camera System: New Features & Improvements

    Apple’s new iPhone 17 Pro brings its most advanced camera system ever, with major hardware and software upgrades. In Apple’s words, it’s like having “eight professional lenses in your pocket” . All three rear cameras now use 48MP “Fusion” sensors (up from two 48MP+two 12MP on the iPhone 16 Pro), capturing sharper detail and enabling high-quality 24MP images by default . Key hardware upgrades include:

    • 48MP main camera (24mm) – ƒ/1.78 aperture, 2.44µm quad‑pixel (1.22µm effective) sensor . Like before, it shoots “super-high-resolution” 48MP frames but outputs 24MP images by default for noise reduction .
    • 48MP ultra-wide camera (13mm) – ƒ/2.2 aperture, 1.4µm quad‑pixel sensor with 120° field of view and dedicated macro mode . This captures dramatic wide-angle and macro shots with rich detail.
    • 48MP telephoto camera (100mm & 200mm) – ƒ/2.8 aperture, 1.4µm quad‑pixel sensor with an upgraded periscope (“tetraprism”) design  . It offers a new 4× optical zoom (100mm) and an 8× optical “cell‑crop” zoom (200mm), the longest-ever iPhone telephoto range  . The telephoto sensor is 56% larger than on iPhone 16 Pro  , and adds 3D sensor-shift OIS for rock-steady shots at long range.
    • Image stabilization – The main and tele lenses both have advanced sensor-shift OIS (3D OIS on tele), and the ultra-wide supports electronic stabilization. In video, a new “ultra‑stabilized” 4K60 Dolby Vision mode uses both sensors to capture smooth action footage  .
    • Front (TrueDepth) camera – A new square 18MP sensor (first on iPhone) with ƒ/1.9 aperture  . This higher-resolution front cam supports “Center Stage” framing (auto‑zoom and rotate in selfies), 4K60 ultra-stable video, and Dual Capture (simultaneous front+rear recording)  . It can shoot in both portrait and landscape orientation without flipping the phone, and automatically expands its field of view to include extra people  .

    Overall, the hardware changes give the 17 Pro a massive zoom range and higher resolution at every focal length – e.g. going from iPhone 16 Pro’s 12MP 5× tele to 48MP 8× tele – plus a much better front cam . Apple sums it up as “three 48MP Fusion cameras [that] capture sharper, more detailed images” at all zoom levels .

    Software & Computational Upgrades

    The iPhone 17 Pro’s software also packs cutting-edge enhancements:

    • Photonic Engine – An upgraded image pipeline uses on-device ML to improve detail, reduce noise, and boost color, especially in low light  . Apple says the new Photonic Engine “leans on ML-based demosaicing to pull cleaner detail and better color out of those quad-pixel sensors, especially in poor light” .
    • New Photographic Styles – iOS 26 adds a “Bright” style that lifts shadows and warms skin tones for punchy portraits  . Users can still choose from multiple styles (Standard, Vibrant, etc.) to give photos a personal look.
    • Focus & Depth Control – Every shot now records depth data so you can convert any photo into a portrait after the fact . Apple calls these “next-generation portraits” – you can adjust background blur or change the focal plane later in Photos.
    • Night mode and HDR – Night mode works on all lenses and is powered by the Photonic Engine for brighter, cleaner low‑light shots . Smart HDR (now HDR 6) is baked into the pipeline to balance highlights/shadows naturally.
    • Clean Up (Object Eraser) – A new Apple Intelligence tool lets you highlight and remove unwanted objects or people from photos directly in the Photos app . (This joins Face‑lighting and other on-device ML features.)
    • Camera UI refinements – In iOS 26 the Camera app is reorganized (quicker mode switching, Settings drawer) and features like exposure, aspect ratio, and Photographic Styles are easier to access. Swift changes include a simple Night mode toggle (Off/Auto/Max) .
    • Pro Controls – Apple continues to offer ProRaw (48MP) capture and – thanks to the A19 Pro chip’s Neural Engines – fast computational features without lag. The new Action Button can be set to quickly launch Camera or switch modes.

    These software upgrades make shooting easier and more creative. For example, the Bright Photographic Style (shown at left below) automatically brightens skin tones and adds vibrance , while Focus Control lets hobbyists “tweak focus” after the fact. Clean Up is unique to iPhone 17, letting you erase distractions with a tap . Altogether, the iPhone 17 Pro’s software brings Apple’s signature computational photography up to a new level of refinement.

    Video Capabilities

    The iPhone 17 Pro doubles down on pro‑grade video:

    • 4K Dolby Vision up to 60/120fps – It records stunning Dolby Vision HDR video at 4K60 as before, and now even 4K120fps for super‑smooth motion or slow‑mo cinematic shots . The front (and rear) cameras can do ultra‑steady 4K60 in Action mode.
    • ProRes & ProRes RAW – iPhone 17 Pro is the first smartphone to capture Apple’s ProRes RAW format , giving filmmakers maximum flexibility in post (highest quality, linear color). All models also support ProRes 4K up to 60fps (with external SSD). In addition, Apple introduced Apple Log 2 with wide-gamut color and even ACES support, for professional color grading .
    • Genlock & Timecode – New for 17 Pro is video genlock and timecode support (via the Blackmagic ProDock accessory) . This lets multiple cameras synchronize frames exactly – a film‑industry first for a phone.
    • Cinematic Mode – Continues to record depth‑of‑field “cinematic” video (up to 4K30 DV) using the main cameras and LiDAR. The logic is largely unchanged, but higher frame rates and Log support give creators more options.
    • Ultra‑stabilization and Dual Capture – The front camera can now shoot “ultra‑stabilized” 4K60 Dolby Vision video . iPhone 17 Pro also offers Dual Capture, recording front and back video simultaneously – great for vlogging or interviews . During FaceTime/zoom calls, Center Stage for video calls uses AI to keep you framed in the middle .
    • Other formats – Like the 16 Pro, it offers 8K30p recording (only on external recording or via upscaling app), ProRes 4K60, Slo‑mo up to 4K120 (rear), and support for Cinema Log, Dolby Vision, ACES workflows etc.

    Overall, the 17 Pro is packed with pro video tools. Apple highlights “more pro video features than ever – like enhanced stabilization, cinema-grade specs, and industry-standard workflows” . In practice this means Hollywood‑level options (Log2, ACES, genlock) in your pocket, plus the ease of shooting with Dolby Vision HDR up to 4K120.

    Comparison to iPhone 16 Pro

    Compared to last year’s iPhone 16 Pro, the 17 Pro is a significant camera upgrade:

    • Telephoto Camera: 16 Pro had two tele cameras: a 12MP 2× crop and a 12MP 5× periscope. The 17 Pro replaces both with one 48MP Fusion Telephoto that offers true 4× (100mm) and 8× (200mm) optical zoom  . This not only doubles the reach (8× vs 5×) but also quadruples the telephoto resolution (48MP vs 12MP) and uses a 56% larger sensor with improved tetraprism optics  .
    • Ultra‑wide & Main: Both remain 48MP on 17 Pro. The wide (24mm) and ultra-wide (13mm) cameras are essentially the same specs as 16 Pro , but benefit from the upgraded pipeline.
    • Front Camera: 17 Pro bumps the TrueDepth cam from 12MP to 18MP and changes to a square sensor. This delivers higher‑res selfies and a much wider field (automatically adjusts orientation and expands for group shots)  .
    • Zoom Range: Maximum digital zoom jumps from 25× on 16 Pro to 40× on 17 Pro  , thanks to the larger tele sensor.
    • Image Processing: The 17 Pro’s updated Photonic Engine and ML-driven pipeline yield cleaner low-light photos and sharper detail. In practice, reviewers note the 17 Pro’s 4× tele looks better than the 16 Pro’s 5× .
    • Video: Both phones shoot 4K60 Dolby Vision. The 17 Pro adds 4K120 Dolby, ProRes RAW, Log2, and genlock. The 16 Pro’s Action Mode tops out at 2.8K60, whereas 17 Pro does 4K60. (Cinematic Mode specs are similar up to 4K30 for both.)
    • Features: All of 16 Pro’s modes (Night, Portrait, Smart HDR 5, Macro, etc.) are still present, but 17 Pro adds new iOS 26 features like Clean Up and Focus Control by default. Both run iOS 26, so styles and UI changes arrive on 16 Pro too, but 17 Pro has exclusive hardware advantages listed above.

    In short, the iPhone 17 Pro keeps the strengths of the 16 Pro’s 48MP Fusion system but supercharges the telephoto and front camera. The result is longer zoom, higher resolution shots, and richer low-light performance .

    Comparison to Major Competitors

    • Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: The S24 Ultra uses a 200MP main sensor (vs 48MP on iPhone), a 12MP ultra-wide, a 10MP 3× tele and a 50MP 5× tele, offering optical zoom at 2×, 3×, 5× and 10× . This gives the S24 Ultra a higher-res main camera and a longer true optical zoom (10×) than the iPhone 17 Pro’s 8×. However, the iPhone’s periscope telephoto pixel density is much higher (48MP vs 10MP), so its 8× shots have more detail. Samsung supports up to 100× “Space Zoom” digitally; Apple’s iPhone goes to 40× digital. The iPhone 17 Pro excels in computational features and video: only Apple offers Dolby Vision on all lenses, ProRes RAW, and Genlock/Log workflows. Samsung emphasizes its new 200MP low-light & 100× AI zoom, whereas Apple highlights multi-lens flexibility and video specs. (Both phones have AI-driven Night modes and portrait bokeh; performance depends on the scene.)
    • Google Pixel 9 Pro: Google’s flagship has a 50MP main, a 48MP ultrawide, and a 48MP 5× telephoto lens . It can do up to 30× “Super Res Zoom” with software. The Pixel’s front cam is a whopping 42MP , far above the iPhone’s 18MP. The Pixel is renowned for AI features (Magic Eraser, Real Tone, etc.), and it also shoots 8K30 video  . The iPhone 17 Pro holds its own by matching or exceeding the Pixel in telephoto zoom (8× vs 5×) and offering exclusive video tools (ProRes RAW/Log, 4K120 Dolby). The iPhone’s Deep Fusion, Photonic Engine, and LiDAR‐aided Night mode produce very competitive low-light shots. Ultimately, iPhone users get a more unified Apple ecosystem (iMovie/Final Cut workflows), while Pixel users enjoy Google’s AI editing and raw-photography features.

    Each of these top phones has its strengths. The iPhone 17 Pro stands out for its holistic “Pro” approach: very high-res sensors, wide zoom range, and tightly integrated software. In side-by-side tests, reviewers praise the 17 Pro’s improved telephoto (4×/8×) and superior video flexibility , even if Samsung pulls ahead on megapixels and Pixel on AI magic.

    Unique Features and Innovations

    The iPhone 17 Pro introduces several standout camera tricks:

    • Periscope Telephoto (8× optical) – The first iPhone with an 8× optical telephoto (200mm equiv.). This long lens, combined with the 48MP sensor, delivers unprecedented detail at distance  .
    • 18MP Square Front Sensor (Center Stage) – A new front camera design that auto‑rotates for landscape selfies and uses Center Stage to keep you framed. Group selfies automatically zoom out; individual selfies use a tighter view  .
    • ProRes RAW Video & Genlock – The 17 Pro is the first phone to record ProRes RAW and to support video genlock/timecode  . Video professionals can now shoot 4K120 Dolby Vision footage with Apple Log 2 and synchronize to cinema gear – a unique advantage for filmmakers.
    • Bright Photographic Style – Apple’s new style preset (available in iOS 26) automatically brightens skin tones and adds punchy vibrance . It’s designed to lift shadowy portraits without overprocessing.
    • Clean Up (Object Erase) – On‑device AI that lets you tap to remove unwanted objects or people from photos . This nimble magic-eraser is a new Apple Intelligence feature that rivals Google’s Magic Eraser.
    • Dual Capture (Front+Back Video) – Simultaneously records from the front and rear cameras . Perfect for vlogs or interviews, this feature is built into iOS’s Camera app.
    • Ultra‑Stabilized 4K Video – Even when walking or running, the phone captures “stunningly smooth 4K60 Dolby Vision video” . The improved sensor-shift plus electronic stabilization keeps action footage crisp.
    • Astrophotography and Macro Enhancements – Apple continues to support night sky mode and macro photography on the ultra-wide, now at a true 48MP resolution, capturing incredibly detailed low-light and close-up shots.
    • One-Billion-Color Processing – With Apple Log 2 and Dolby Vision HDR, the 17 Pro handles a billion colors. Combined with Dolby Vision and HDR10+, its videos and photos can show more dynamic range than ever.
    • Customizable Camera Control – A new back button (Action Button) can instantly launch Camera or toggle modes, speeding up access for pro shooters.
    • Pro Camera App Modes – The Camera app gained “ProRaw with manual controls” and higher output resolution, and now all Photographic Styles and depth edits carry over to video frames too.
    • Cosmic Orange Color – (Not camera-specific, but enthusiasts love it!) The new orange finish was noted by reviewers as eye-catching, though some pros will stick to black for stealth.

    All told, the iPhone 17 Pro’s camera system is a very exciting leap. It marries Apple’s signature ease-of-use with pro-level firepower: enormous sensors, extreme zoom, powerful image processing, and movie‑studio video features. Users get an enthusiast’s toolkit that’s still an iPhone – fast, smooth, and ready for anyone from family photographers to indie filmmakers. The consensus from early reviews is clear: the iPhone 17 Pro’s camera is cutting-edge and incredibly versatile, pushing smartphone photography and videography forward .

    Sources: Apple’s official announcements and tech specs , plus hands-on reviews and comparisons (9to5Mac, Austin Mann) and Samsung/Google spec sheets . All features above are documented by Apple and trusted reviewers as cited.

  • What’s the upside of a Corolla Cross Hybrid over a Prius?

    DimensionToyota Corolla Cross Hybrid (2023–24)Toyota Prius (2023–24)
    Fuel Efficiency (EPA)AWD hybrid: about 45 city / 38 highway mpg (≈42 mpg combined) . (FWD gas Cross: ~31/33.)FWD LE: 57 city / 56 hwy (≈57 combined) . (AWD: ~54 combined) . XLE/Ltd: ~52 combined.
    Cargo / Interior SpaceCargo: ~26.5 cu ft behind rear seats, expanding to ~66.8 cu ft with seats folded . Interior: ~114.9 cu ft total (88.4 passenger space ), 5 seats. Generous headroom (~39.0 in rear ) and upright ride height aid visibility.Cargo: 23.8 cu ft (LE) or 20.3 cu ft (XLE/Ltd) behind seats ; rear seats fold 60/40 for some expansion. Interior: 91 cu ft passenger . 5 seats, but a much lower roof: front/rear headroom ~38.0/36.4 in . Note the “peaked” roofline cuts headroom and hampers rear visibility .
    AWD AvailabilityStandard AWD on all hybrid trims . (Gas versions: FWD standard, AWD optional for ~$1.3k .)Optional AWD on every trim (added ~40 hp via rear motor). AWD Prius LE earns ~54 mpg combined vs 57 mpg FWD. AWD adds ~$1,400 .
    Tech & InfotainmentBase: 7″ touchscreen (8″ on higher trims) with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and Wi‑Fi hotspot . USB-C ports (2 front, 2 rear on upper trims), available wireless charger, and optional JBL 9‑speaker audio . Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 (AEB w/ pedestrian & cyclist, lane-centering, radar cruise) is standard .Base: 8″ touchscreen (LE/XLE) running Toyota’s new Audio Multimedia; Limited trim has 12.3″ screen . Wireless CarPlay/Android Auto standard . Available digital gauge cluster (7″ or 12.3″). Standard TSS 3.0 safety suite (AEB w/ pedestrian, lane-keep, auto high-beams) . Optional surround-view camera on Limited.
    Ground Clearance / Ride Height≈8.1 in (200 mm) ground clearance . Tall SUV stance gives good visibility over traffic and a smooth, car-like ride.5.6–6.0 in ground clearance (higher trims). Very low, sloped profile improves aerodynamics but sacrifices headroom and ground clearance (worse on steep driveways). Taller Prius AWD is 5.6″, XLE/Ltd are 6.0″ .
    Performance & Handling2.0L hybrid system: ~196 hp total (incl. rear motor) . 0–60 mph ≈7.3 s . Turbo‐fast throttle, much quicker than the gas model. Ride: Sport‐tuned suspension on S/SE/XSE trims yields a firmer, “flinty” ride . Steering is light/“overboosted.” Overall handling is stable but not sporty; the hybrid’s weight slightly dulls braking (longer stops) .2.0L hybrid: 194 hp (FWD) . 0–60 in ~7.1 s . Handling is much improved: wider track, stiffer chassis, thicker tires—Prius “flows gracefully through corners” with minimal body roll . Steering is more precise than before. The ride is firm (especially on XLE/19″ wheels) but composed .
    Safety & Driver AidsToyota Safety Sense 3.0 standard: AEB (car/pedestrian/cyclist), lane‑departure alert + lane‑tracing assist, adaptive cruise, auto high-beams, etc. . IIHS 2023 Top Safety Pick+ (good ratings in most tests) . NHTSA: 4/5 stars frontal, 5/5 side . Higher trims add blind‑spot monitoring, rear cross‑traffic alert, front/rear parking sensors with auto‑brake .Toyota Safety Sense 3.0: automatic emergency braking (car/pedestrian), lane‑departure alert w/ steering assist, lane‑keeping, adaptive cruise, auto high beams . (Both models share similar tech.) 2023 Prius is newly released, but likely to earn strong ratings. Consumer reviews note no safety complaints; IIHS small overlap front (driver/passenger) passed with “Good” scores .
    Price / ValueHybrid models start ~$29–33K MSRP (e.g. S $29.3K, SE $30.6K) . Base gas Cross ~$25K. Toyota often sells at or slightly above MSRP nowadays. Generally considered a value: roomy, AWD, hybrid power, and standard safety for the price .Prius base LE ~$28.5K (FWD); XLE ~$32K, Limited ~$35.6K. AWD adds ~$1.4K. Less cargo space and fewer features than some competitors for the price. However, Prius’s exceptional fuel economy and brand appeal justify its premium for buyers prioritizing efficiency .

    Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid – Key Pros and Cons

    • Pros: The Corolla Cross Hybrid delivers a smooth, comfortable ride and roomy interior (headroom and cargo) for the class  . It combines a nearly 200‑hp hybrid powertrain with standard AWD, yielding brisk acceleration (0–60 ≈7.3 s ) and very good fuel economy for an SUV (~42 mpg combined ). Toyota’s latest tech (8″ touchscreen with wireless CarPlay/Android Auto) and a full suite of Safety Sense 3.0 features are standard  . Owners rave about its reliability and comfort . In short, it offers utility and efficiency (much better mpg than non-hybrid Cross) at a competitive price  .
    • Cons: The Cross Hybrid isn’t sporty: the steering feels light and the handling is not very engaging  . The hybrid adds weight, which makes braking distances longer (182 ft from 70 mph) . Entry trims lack heated seats (only XSE gets them) . Some owners find the base engine (in non-hybrid trims) underwhelming – and even the hybrid can feel only “adequate,” especially with a 5‑passenger load. A few owners noted less power and speed uphill and some dealer markups . Finally, tech is decent but rival SUVs offer larger screens/audio options.

    Toyota Prius – Key Pros and Cons

    • Pros: The all-new 2023 Prius finally marries stunning styling with stellar efficiency. Its 194 hp hybrid powertrain yields strong acceleration (0–60 ≈7.1 s ) and exceptional fuel economy – up to 57 mpg combined in the base FWD trim  (even AWD versions are still in the mid-50s ). The chassis is much improved: a lower center of gravity and tuned suspension give sharp handling with minimal lean . The new interior is more upscale and ergonomic, with available digital dash and (in higher trims) a 12.3″ touchscreen  . Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 comes standard . Users praise the refined ride and build quality, and many note how fun the car feels compared to old Prius models  .
    • Cons: The Prius’s radical design sacrifices space. The sleek roofline crimps headroom (especially in back) and rear visibility . Cargo capacity is smaller (20.3–23.8 cu ft) than the previous generation or many hatchbacks . Owners report feeling the fuel-economy drop at higher speeds or in heavier trims (e.g. ~52 mpg in XLE vs 57 in LE) . Seat comfort is reportedly down a notch from the old Prius . The low-profile tires and firmer suspension can make the ride noticeably stiffer. Some buyers also grumble about the higher price (base ~ $28.5K) for relatively few features; a few say the Prius feels “overpriced” given its compromises. Overall, the Prius excels at economy and style, but its smaller cabin and cargo space are its main downsides  .

    Sources: Official specs and Toyota press materials (via Toyota.com and dealer PDFs), expert reviews (Car and Driver, TrueCar, Cars.com) , and owner feedback from Kelley Blue Book and forums . (MSRP and pricing from TrueCar and Car and Driver .) All info pertains to 2023–24 model years.

  • Pentax 17 Film Camera Overview

    Technical Specifications

    The Pentax 17 is a 35mm half-frame point-and-shoot camera (24×17 mm frames) .  It has a fixed 25 mm f/3.5 lens (≈37 mm full-frame equiv.) with 3 elements/3 groups and a 61° field of view .  Manual zone focusing (6 preset distances from 0.25 m to ∞) is set via a rotary dial .  Exposure is Program AE (1/350–4 s + Bulb) and ISO is set manually (50–3200, including values 125/160) .  A bright Albada-type viewfinder shows parallax-corrected frames for distant and close subjects .  A built-in flash (GN≈6 at ISO100, ~9 s recycle) covers fill and low-light .

    SpecificationDetail
    Frame size:35mm half-frame (24×17 mm)
    Lens:25 mm f/3.5 (37 mm equiv.), HD-coated
    Focus:6-zone manual (Macro 0.24 m, Tabletop 0.5 m, … ∞)
    Viewfinder:Albada bright-frame, close-up compensation
    Metering:Partial (center-weighted), EV 2.5–16.5 (ISO100)
    Exposure:Auto (P) 1/350–4 s + Bulb
    Flash:Built-in GN≈6 (ISO100, 1 m), 9 s recycle
    ISO:Manual ISO 50–3200 (with stops 125,160)
    Exposure Comp.:±2 EV (1/3-step)
    Film advance:Manual lever (130° stroke)
    Film rewind:Manual crank (mid-roll rewind)
    Power:1×CR2 battery (~10 rolls/700+ half-frames)
    Weight:≈290 g (body only)
    Dimensions:~127×78×52 mm

    Design and Build

    The Pentax 17 has a retro-inspired, black-and-silver exterior recalling classic Pentax SLRs .  Its top/bottom covers are lightweight magnesium alloy , while most of the chassis is plastic.  Controls include a thumb-operated film-wind lever, a large shutter button with surrounding on/off switch, a mode dial, an ISO-speed dial (50–3200), and a ±2 EV exposure-compensation dial .  An external ISO dial and dedicated EV dial are uncommon on point‑&‑shoot cameras and underscore its film-centric design . The Pentax 17 includes a wrist strap and lens cap.  (Uniquely, the supplied wrist-strap doubles as a 25 cm distance gauge for macro focus .)

    The zone-focus dial on the lens barrel offers six fixed distances (Macro, Tabletop, Close, Medium, Far, ∞) .  Focusing is electronic – turning the dial tells the camera where to move the lens when the shutter button is half‑pressed.  This yields accurate framing with bright parallax-compensated frame lines, though it introduces a slight shutter lag (as noted by reviewers) .  Other standout features include a bright Albada viewfinder with fixed focus frames , a glass prism for an informative display, and an engraved “Asahi Optical Co.” logo and Pentax calligraphy on the top plate .  A film-reminder slot on the back lets you slip in the film box tab.  In sum, the Pentax 17 blends vintage styling with solid build and manual-like controls for a tactile, analog feel .

    Shooting Modes and Controls

    The Pentax 17 offers seven shooting modes: Full Auto, Program AE, Slow, Bokeh, Bulb, Daylight Sync Flash, and Slow‑Sync Flash .  It fully automates aperture and shutter in all modes, with no manual aperture setting.  The Auto modes handle exposure and flash; Bulb allows long exposures, and special modes (e.g. Bokeh) fix focus at a moderate distance for background blur.  Film loading is easy (speed load), and everything from frame advance to ISO setting is done manually.  An LCD atop the camera shows exposure compensation, while LEDs in the viewfinder indicate ready-to-shoot, low light, or flash status.  As one reviewer notes, the Pentax 17 “answers the frustration” of older cameras by providing programmable modes and ISO adjustment, making it simple even for beginners .

    Hands-On Reviews and Expert Opinions

    Reviewers have been largely positive about the Pentax 17.  PetaPixel calls it a “gorgeous camera that harkens back to Pentax’s glory days,” noting its stylish titanium-colored finish and nods to classic Pentax models .  They praise the accurate viewfinder frame lines and fun shooting experience (despite some graininess) .  35mmc (Hamish Gill) found the 17 to have a “solid and balanced series of features,” quiet operation, and design that both feels modern and honors Pentax heritage.  He concludes it “takes great photos” and is “really enjoyable” to use – in fact, “I can see myself recommending it to beginners without reservation.” .

    The Raw Camera’s Tristan Zand emphasizes the build and optics: the Pentax 17 “excels in optical quality, build, and reliable exposure,” delivering sharp images with vibrant color .  He notes minor drawbacks – a slight shutter lag from the electronic focus, an unneeded on/off switch, and easily shifted dials – but calls it a “fun, versatile tool for casual photography.”  He concludes it’s “a unique companion for film enthusiasts who value simplicity and portability,” even if advanced users may miss manual controls . Analog Wonderland’s Paul McKay similarly enjoys its manual film wind and modern conveniences (dedicated ISO and EV dials) as well as the creative modes, though he cautions that the flash recharge can be slow. Overall, experts agree the Pentax 17 is well-made and charming, with very few serious flaws for its intended use .

    Image Quality and Sample Photos

    The Pentax 17’s output has classic film character. In this street portrait (shot on Kodak Portra 400), colors are rich and the subject is sharp – reviewers note “excellent color reproduction” and minimal vignetting from the 25 mm lens .  The vertical half-frame format is evident.  Grain is visible (the scan was ~2905×2048 px ), giving a filmic texture.  As one reviewer puts it, “the images are grainy and the camera occasionally over- or under-exposes” – but despite this the Pentax 17 “turned out to be a fun and stylish companion,” yielding many keepers .

    Another Portra 400 sample shows good handling of contrast and skin tones. The in-camera metering tends toward accuracy (even high-ISO films like T-Max 3200 gave well-exposed shots in tests ), though very bright or dark scenes may need +/– exposure comp.  Overall, images from the Pentax 17 are sharp in focus (especially within the frame lines), with the expected analog film grain and dynamic range. The camera’s files (after lab scanning) came in around 2900×2048 pixels , easily shareable. Reviewers emphasize that shooting half-frame doubles your photos: one says twice the images per roll “is a boon” given film costs . In sum, sample photos show vibrant color and clarity; any minor exposure quirks are outweighed by the fun of shooting a new film camera .

    Comparison with Similar Cameras

    CameraFrameLens (35 mm equiv.)ApertureFocusNotes/Price (USD)
    Pentax 17 (2024)24×17 mm half-frame25 mm (37 mm)f/3.56-zone manualBuilt-in flash; ISO & EV dials; ~$500
    Kodak Ektar H35N (2023)24×17 mm half-frame30 mm (45 mm)f/3.5 fixedFixed-focus, program AESimple plastic body, one zone focus; ~$100; reviewers say “not on same level” as Pentax
    Lomography Lomourette (2025)24×17 mm half-frame24 mm (36 mm)f/8 or f/11Fixed-focusToy-like Diana camera; bulb & multi-exposure; ~$69
    Olympus Pen EE‑S (1966)24×17 mm half-frame22.5 mm (41 mm)f/2.8 fixed3-zone (selenium meter)Vintage rangefinder Pen; 48 exp/24-roll; fully mechanical; very low cost (used)
    Olympus Trip 35 (1967)36×24 mm full-frame40 mm (40 mm)f/2.8–16 (auto)3-zone (selenium meter)Classic compact; full-frame; no flash/limited ISO; popular point‑&‑shoot from era; ~$100 used

    In other words, the Pentax 17 sits at the high end of new half-frame cameras.  Cheaper models like Kodak’s H35N or Lomography’s Lomourette trade build quality and versatility for low price – reviewers note H35N is only a basic beginner camera and “not on the same level” as the Pentax .  Vintage half-frame cameras (Olympus Pen series) also give 2× exposures at very low cost , but lack any modern automation.  Compared to common full-frame 35mm point‑&‑shoots (e.g. Olympus Trip 35 or Lomo LC-A), the Pentax 17’s main difference is its half-frame format and zone-focus system; it is larger than pocket compacts but still far smaller than an SLR.

    Availability and Pricing

    The Pentax 17 launched in 2024 (Japan in June; North America/Europe in Fall 2024).  It is sold in Dark Silver and Light Silver finishes.  Major retailers currently list it around $497. For example, B&H Photo shows it at $496.95 , and Adorama lists it $496.95 (a $499.95 MSRP minus $3) .  Ricoh’s official site lists it at $499.95 and often offers free film bundles.  Adorama’s standard bundle includes two free 35 mm film rolls (worth ≈$72) . Amazon and other vendors similarly offer it for about $500 (some overseas deals have reached ~€399 during promotions ).  It quickly sold out in many markets, but by 2025 it is generally in stock at camera stores (and as new stock arrives from Japan).  In summary, expect to pay about $500, often with bonus film or strap; check retailers like B&H【15†】, Adorama【17†】, Amazon【46†】, or local photo shops for current availability.

    Unique Features

    • Half-Frame Vertical Format: Captures two 17×24 mm vertical images per 35 mm frame , echoing smartphone aspect ratios .  This is rare in new cameras and doubles exposures per roll (e.g. 72 on a 36-exposure roll ).
    • Zone-Focus System: Unusual for a compact, the 17 has six focus zones (including true macro at 25 cm) selected via a ring  .  This lets the shooter preset distance without guessing, and the active focus frame is visible through the viewfinder.
    • Bright Albada Viewfinder: The optical viewfinder uses a bright frame finder (Albada) with fixed focus frames.  It even has a close-up compensation frame for macro shots , aiding composition on very short focus distances.
    • ISO and EV Dials: Unlike most point‑&‑shoots, the Pentax 17 provides dedicated dials for ISO (50–3200) and exposure compensation (±2 EV)  .  This makes it easy to use different films and adjust exposure on the fly – one reviewer noted “there is no excuse to not shoot Portra 160!” given the wide ISO range .
    • Creative Modes: It offers seven distinct modes (Program AE, Auto slow-sync, Bulb, etc.) , plus a “Bokeh” mode that locks focus at a medium distance for blurred backgrounds.  These built-in creative options provide more flexibility than simple point‑shoots.
    • Retro-Material Build: Solid metal top/bottom plates and classic Pentax branding (Asahi logo, “Craftsmanship by Pentax” engraving) give it a premium feel  .  The manual film advance lever and cold-crank rewind evoke traditional SLR operation.
    • Wrist Strap Macro Tool: Ingeniously, the included wrist strap is 25 cm long – exactly the close-focus distance.  Holding the strap taut in front of the lens provides an instant ruler for macro photography . This quirky feature is unique to the Pentax 17.
    • Hybrid Electronics: The camera combines mechanical controls with electronic systems (e.g. the lens is driven electronically when you half-press the shutter).  While this enables zone focusing, it is unusual in an essentially “manual” camera and suggests Pentax may reuse this design in future (even for autofocus) .

    Target Audience and Use Cases

    Pentax positions the 17 at a broad range of users: it is “ideal” for both long-time film enthusiasts and newcomers eager to try analog .  Reviewers echo this: 35mmc notes the camera is “easy to understand even for the beginner” yet feature-rich enough that experienced photographers won’t feel shortchanged .  Its compact size, fixed wide-ish lens, and plentiful exposures make it well-suited for street and travel photography or any on-the-move shooting.  The vertical half-frame format aligns with smartphone habits, making it fun for social-media style photos . In practical terms, it’s a beginners’ dream (Pellets of tech, no exposure mistakes) but also a novelty for film buffs who value its retro charm.

    On the other hand, advanced users should note its limitations. There is no true manual aperture or shutter control, no DX film coding, and focus zones rather than continuous focus.  As one review states, its “automatic nature limits [its] appeal for advanced users” .  Photographers needing fast response or full manual overrides (for action or studio work) might prefer SLRs or rangefinders.  But for casual, everyday shooting – especially street scenes and portraits – the Pentax 17 offers a unique, user-friendly film experience that many fans of analog are finding delightful .

    Sources: Official Pentax/Ricoh product information ; retailer listings (B&H , Adorama【17†】, Amazon【46†】); and hands-on reviews from PetaPixel , 35mmc , Amateur Photographer , RawCamera , etc., as cited above.

  • Ricoh GR IV Overview

    Technical Specifications

    FeatureSpecification
    Sensor25.74 MP APS-C BSI-CMOS (23.3×15.5 mm)
    Lens18.3 mm F2.8 (28 mm full-frame equiv.), 7 elements/5 groups (3 asph.)
    ApertureF2.8 – F16
    Image ProcessorGR ENGINE 7
    Stabilization5-axis sensor-shift SR IBIS (≈6 stops)
    ISO Range100–204800 (standard)
    Shutter1/4000–30 sec (mechanical/electronic); X-sync 1/180 sec
    Continuous Shooting4 fps (JPEG burst up to ~30 frames)
    AutofocusHybrid AF (image-plane phase + contrast detect); Face/Eye Detect
    LCD Screen3.0″ fixed touchscreen, ~1.04 million dots
    ViewfinderNone (optional external optical finder available)
    Internal Memory~53 GB built-in (intended as emergency backup)
    Card SlotmicroSD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) – note MicroSD only (no full-size SD)
    Video1920×1080 at 24/30/60 fps (MOV/H.264)
    ND FilterBuilt-in 2-stop neutral-density filter
    ConnectivityUSB-C (PD charging, DisplayPort Alt), Micro-HDMI, Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, Bluetooth 5.3
    BatteryRechargeable DB-120 Li-ion (approx. 6.9 Wh); ≈250 shots (CIPA)
    Dimensions109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
    Weight~262 g (body + battery + memory)

    The GR IV packs a new back-illuminated 25.74 MP APS-C sensor and the updated 18.3 mm F2.8 GR lens (28 mm equiv.) . It adds 5-axis in-body stabilization (~6 stops) and a much larger 53 GB internal memory (up from 2 GB on the GR III) to its slim metal body.  The standard ISO range is 100–204800 , and stills can be shot at up to 4 fps with continuous AF.  Video is limited to Full HD 1080p60 .  Overall the specifications are an evolution of the GR III: the sensor and processor are new, but the 28 mm/F2.8 focal length and 3.0″ fixed LCD remain the same . The camera measures 109.4×61.1×32.7 mm and weighs about 262 g with battery – exceptionally compact for an APS-C camera .

    Reviews and User Feedback

    Professional reviews generally praise the GR IV as a meaningful upgrade for street photographers. Amateur Photographer reports that “while the Ricoh GR IV may look very much like its predecessor, it’s been substantially upgraded inside” .  In testing, reviewers applaud its image quality and fast operation.  AP’s verdict highlights “excellent image quality”, the “massive” internal storage and improved IBIS as major pros. It also notes the quick 0.6 s startup and responsive controls.  Similarly, a PetaPixel review finds the new 26 MP BSI sensor and redesigned lens improve low-light performance and corner sharpness . PetaPixel also remarks that Ricoh addressed past complaints: it restored the old exposure-compensation rocker and increased battery size (yielding about 250 CIPA shots) .

    However, reviewers also point out limitations. Both AP and others lament the lack of a finder or tilting screen, citing the fixed 3.0″ LCD and no EVF as drawbacks . Video capabilities (no 4K) and the 4 fps max burst have changed little, which Digital Camera World calls “evolution, not revolution” .  PetaPixel notes autofocus still isn’t fully modern – it lacks advanced subject-detection modes (e.g. pets, cars) and often works best in single-point or zone mode .  In hands-on tests, Fstoppers highlights that GR IV’s autofocus “is far more dependable” than past models and that IBIS even allows handheld 4‑second exposures (a “major step up”) .  But it also warns that the 262‑shot battery life (in practice ~300‑400) and the LCD’s modest brightness/resolution “trail behind” competing cameras .  In summary, reviewers view the GR IV as a refined street camera: it keeps the compact GR charm but with beefed-up internals (sensor, storage, stabilization), while still sacrificing features like 4K video or a viewfinder.

    Among users and enthusiast communities, the GR series enjoys a cult following of street/travel photographers . Early user comments echo the pros from reviews: they celebrate the extra storage, faster AF, and portability. Some are concerned about the steep new price and missing modern features (e.g. 4K), but most agree the GR IV stays true to the classic GR formula.

    Comparisons with Similar Cameras

    FeatureRicoh GR IVRicoh GR IIIFujifilm X100V
    Sensor25.7 MP APS-C24.2 MP APS-C26.1 MP APS-C X-Trans
    Lens18.3 mm f/2.8 (28 mm eq.)18.3 mm f/2.8 (28 mm eq.)23 mm f/2.0 (35 mm eq.)
    Stabilization5-axis SR IBIS (~6 stops)3-axis SR IBIS (~4 stops)None
    ISO Range100–204800100–102400160–12800 (80–51200 ext.)
    Video1080p60 (MOV/H.264)1080p604K30 (≤10 min)
    Screen3.0″ fixed 1.04 M-dot3.0″ fixed 1.04 M-dot3.0″ tilting 1.62 M-dot
    Storage53 GB internal + microSD2 GB internal + SDSD/SDHC/SDXC (no built-in)
    Battery≈250 shots (CIPA)≈200 shots≈350 (EVF) / 420 (OVF)
    Size (W×H×D)109.4×61.1×32.7 mm109.4×61.9×33.2 mm128×74.8×53.3 mm
    Weight~262 g~257 g~478 g

    Compared to its predecessor GR III, the GR IV gains 5-axis IBIS (vs 3-axis) and 53 GB of onboard memory (vs 2 GB) , with only minor changes to sensor resolution (+1.5 MP) and body size.  It remains at 28 mm equivalent f/2.8, 4 fps continuous shooting, and Full-HD video like the GR III.  The body is fractionally thinner (109.4×61.1×32.7 mm vs 109.4×61.9×33.2 mm) and 5 g heavier .

    Among competitors in the premium compact class, Fujifilm’s X100 series is the most-direct rival.  The (rumored) X100VI carries a 40.2 MP sensor and 23 mm f/2 lens , giving far higher resolution and 6.2K/30p video, but in a much larger, heavier body (~521 g) with a hybrid OVF/EVF .  In contrast, the GR IV’s 25.7 MP files are smaller but still very high quality, its body is roughly half the weight (262 g) and true pocketable .  Fujifilm’s X100V (26.1 MP, 23 mm f/2, with 5-axis IBIS in body) is similar in that sense, but the X100V has no in-body stabilization and costs about $1400 at launch. In summary, the GR IV trades sensor resolution and video specs for absolute portability and simplicity. (For example, one comparison notes “X100VI… larger and heavier” and “GR IV is ultra-slim, pocket-first minimalism” .) Other fixed-lens compacts (like the Leica Q2 full-frame 28 mm f/1.7) also exist, but the GR IV remains unique in offering an APS-C sensor in a truly pocketable form.

    Pricing and Availability

    The Ricoh GR IV was announced August 20, 2025, with first shipments in mid-September 2025.  The US MSRP is $1,499.95 .  Ricoh’s press materials list suggested prices of £1,199.99 (UK) and €1,349.99 (Europe) .  Major retailers (B&H, Adorama, etc.) have the GR IV available for preorder around these prices.  For reference, the GR III launched in 2019 at $899 (MSRP), so the new model is significantly more expensive. As of late 2025, it is sold worldwide (with official Ricoh warranties) but often in limited supply due to its niche appeal.

    Best Use Cases and Recommended Styles

    • Street Photography: The GR IV’s true strengths lie in candid/street shooting. Its 28 mm field-of-view, unobtrusive design, and lightning-fast startup and response make it ideal for “grab-and-shoot” moments. The hybrid AF and snap-focus modes support quick framing from the hip. It excels at travel, urban and documentary work where discretion and pocketability matter.
    • Travel and Everyday Carry: Extremely compact and lightweight for its image quality, the GR IV is easy to carry daily. Its built-in Wi-Fi and USB-C charging also suit travellers. The generous internal memory provides a backup if you forget cards.
    • Low-Light Stills: The F2.8 lens plus 5-axis IBIS (≈6 stops) help stabilize long exposures for low-light stills and night scenes.  (However, without a finder, low-light shooting may be awkward.)
    • Landscape & Architecture: At 28 mm, it captures wide scenes well; paired with in-body IS and high ISO, it can yield sharp cityscapes and interiors.
    • Macro / Close-ups: A dedicated macro mode allows focusing as close as ~6 cm, letting you shoot flowers or detail scenes – a unique trait for a street camera.
    • Creative Shooting: The GR IV offers in-camera image control (film-sim modes, filters) and a built-in 2-stop ND filter for creative exposures. Its strengths are in stills and composition rather than video.

    Strengths, Weaknesses, and Unique Features

    • Strengths:
      • Image Quality: Large 25.7 MP APS-C sensor and GR lens deliver sharp, high-detail photos . The fast F2.8 aperture aids low-light shooting.
      • Pocketability: Truly one of the smallest APS-C cameras, it’s easy to slip into a jacket or jeans pocket (109.4×61.1×32.7 mm) .
      • Improved Stabilization: 5-axis IBIS yields about 6 stops of shake reduction  (up from 4 stops on GR III).
      • Massive Built-In Memory: 53 GB internal storage means you can shoot even if your SD card is full or missing .
      • Quick Operation: Fast 0.6 s startup and responsive controls support decisive shooting. The return of the exposure-compensation toggle and addition of a Snap-focus mode further aid rapid shooting.
      • Stealthy Design: No protruding lenses or viewfinders (unless added), so it remains discreet – a hallmark of the GR line .
    • Weaknesses:
      • No Viewfinder or Tilt Screen: The rear LCD is fixed and there is no built-in EVF/OVF, which many rival compacts offer. Composing at eye level or in bright sun is harder .
      • Video/Speed Limitations: Only 1080p video (no 4K) and a modest 4 fps burst limit versatility.  Continuous AF for video or sports is basic.
      • Battery Life: ~250 CIPA shots per charge  (~300–400 in practice ) is relatively low for the price. Longer outings require spare batteries.
      • High Price: At ~$1500, it is much more expensive than the GR III or most compacts; buyers expect commensurately advanced features.
      • MicroSD Slot: Switching from a full-size SD to a MicroSD card (for space) may frustrate some due to smaller size and slightly slower speeds.
      • Autofocus Limitations: Although improved, the AF system still lacks advanced tracking modes – it can lose fast-moving subjects and has no animal/vehicle detection .
    • Unique Features:
      • Snap/Zone Focus Mode: A unique GR feature that lets you preset a focus distance for quick, jump-focus shooting (great for street snaps).
      • Built-in ND Filter: The 2-stop ND filter is rare in such small cameras, enabling longer exposures in daylight.
      • Ultra-Compact Assembly: The GR IV’s design (retractable lens, magnesium body) is optimized so that it remains slimmer than typical mirrorless kits .
      • GR-System Ecosystem: Supports GR-specific accessories (wide-angle converter, GPS, etc.) and Ricoh’s GR app for remote control/firmware, which may appeal to existing GR users.

    In conclusion, the Ricoh GR IV is a refined street- and travel-oriented compact. It offers the combination of an APS-C sensor and high-speed prime lens in a very small package. Its strengths are its image quality, extreme portability, and fast performance. Its limitations are mostly by design (no EVF, fixed lens, moderate video) and by price. For photographers who prize pure pocketability and decisive shooting (especially in urban or travel contexts), the GR IV is a compelling, if premium-priced, tool .

    Sources: Technical specs from Ricoh and press materials ; professional reviews and comparisons ; industry news ; and Ricoh/Fujifilm official documentation . Each source is cited inline above.

  • what’s the best camera on the market right now?

    Pentax 17 for film photography

    probably the Fujifilm x100VI, 6-> as a general over all arounder

    The new Ricoh GR IV will probably be my new pick.

  • What’s new with the iPhone 17 Pro camera system?

    so the new matte orange iPhone Pro concept that I came up with… currently reading the marketing copy for it, but I’m not really certain or sure what the new camera is about?

  • bitcoin Orange iPhone pro marketing suggestions

    ”vapor”,,, vapor chamber —> focus more on this

  • iPhone air marketing suggestions

    some ideas:

    first —> iPhone Air

    ”you gotta hold it to believe it”

    also

    ”this is what the future feels like”

  • Eric Kim, Eric Kim iPhone Titan, titanium …. History concept idea 

    I’ve been campaigning for an iPhone Pro Titan for a long time ?

  • ERIC KIM IPHONE TITANIUM Apple’s Titanium iPhone and Design Credits

    Apple officially introduced a titanium frame on the iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max, framing it as an internal innovation.  Apple’s own press release describes the new models as having a “strong and lightweight titanium design” .  Senior VP Greg Joswiak likewise touted the “state-of-the-art titanium design” as part of Apple’s innovations .  Crucially, Apple’s announcements and marketing explicitly attribute the design to Apple’s own engineering and design teams – there is no mention of any outside concept contributor.  Apple’s Newsroom notes that the iPhone 15 Pro was “designed with aerospace-grade titanium” to make “Apple’s lightest Pro models ever” .  In interviews and press materials, Apple credits internal design leaders (e.g. VPs Molly Anderson and Alan Dye) for its products.  In short, official sources credit the titanium design to Apple itself, not to any external designer.

    Industry Rumors and Reports

    Major Apple pundits and leak sites also make no link between Eric Kim and Apple’s titanium phones.  For example, MacRumors reports that Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro (2025) was expected to drop the titanium frame in favor of aluminum , further showing that Apple’s material choices came from its own roadmap, not fan speculation.  That report even notes that “titanium will not disappear entirely but instead become a defining feature of the newly introduced iPhone Air” .  None of these rumors or leaks mention Eric Kim or credit an external concept to him – they attribute frame choices to technical trade‑offs and Apple’s strategy.  Likewise, earlier rumors (e.g. iPhone 15 Pro switching to titanium ) cite analysts and leakers (Bloomberg’s Gurman, Jeff Pu, ShrimpApplePro) as sources for the material change – again no reference to any concept artist.  In sum, the tech press traces the titanium design to Apple’s own plans and supply chain, and it makes no mention of Eric Kim in this context.

    Concept Renders and Fan Designs

    Independent concept artists have indeed created “titanium iPhone” designs, but those credit the artists themselves.  For instance, Yanko Design published an iPhone 17 Pro Max concept (by designer ADR Studio) that imagines a four‑camera phone with a titanium frame .  That write-up clearly names Antonio de Rosa/ADR Studio as the designer – Eric Kim’s name does not appear.  Similarly, fan-made renders and conceptual videos (e.g. on Reddit or YouTube) depicting titanium iPhones are created by various hobbyists and influencers, none of which cite Eric Kim as originator.  No design patent or Apple patent names Eric Kim; patents describing titanium alloys or finishes mention only Apple’s engineers or use generic language. In other words, any fan concept of a “titanium iPhone Pro” is independently produced and credited to its creator, and no such concept lists Eric Kim.

    Eric Kim’s Own Speculations

    Eric Kim himself has blogged about bold iPhone ideas (e.g. “iPhone Mini Titanium” or “Matte Titanium Orange iPhone Pro”), but these are explicitly his personal wish-list and speculation, not insider information.  In his high-visibility orange iPhone piece, Kim even describes his concept as speculative and “based on personal vision rather than any insider leak” .  Notably, Kim has explicitly acknowledged that he was not on Apple’s design team.  In a detailed blog about the iPhone Air, he writes:

    “Did Eric Kim design Apple’s iPhone Air?  No. Apple credits its own design leadership and teams … as the folks behind the product’s vision. There’s no credible reporting that Eric Kim worked on Apple’s design team” .

    This admission underscores that Eric Kim is not officially involved in Apple’s product designs.  The same reasoning applies to any “titanium iPhone Pro” idea – Apple’s designs are internally driven.

    Conclusion

    No official source or reputable report credits Eric Kim with inventing the iPhone Pro titanium concept. Apple’s announcements and tech press credit the titanium frame to Apple’s own engineering.  Concept designs by others (e.g. ADR Studio) credit those designers, not Kim .  Eric Kim’s name only appears in his own blog and videos where he speculates about future iPhones, but he himself notes that these are personal concepts and that Apple never included him in its design process .  In summary, aside from his self-published musings, there is no evidence in official announcements, patents, or credible rumors linking Eric Kim to the titanium iPhone Pro concept.

    Sources: Apple’s official iPhone 15 Pro announcement (titanium frame) ; Eric Kim’s blog (credit for design is Apple’s own) ; Yanko Design concept (titanium iPhone by ADR Studio) ; MacRumors on 2025 iPhones (17 Pro ditching titanium, Air using titanium) . These and other tech reports mention titanium but do not associate Eric Kim with the design.

  • Bitcoin: The Anti-Toxic Revolution

    In an era of endless outrage and digital noise, Bitcoin stands as a bastion of clarity. Social media algorithms whip us into a frenzy; Bitcoin’s code delivers calm. The scroll-driven world feeds on anger and distraction. The decentralized currency, however, encourages focus and honesty. Bitcoin is the antidote to digital toxicity.

    Isn’t it strange that our news feeds reward fury and ignore honesty? We chase likes and get lost in echo chambers. Algorithms sell our attention to the highest bidder.

    By contrast, Bitcoin’s open-source ledger is a quiet revolution. No hidden manipulation, no curated drama—just transparent trust. Code is law, not hype.

    Bitcoin’s censorship resistance is pure defiance against toxicity. On social networks, one misstep and you’re silenced. With Bitcoin, no gatekeeper tells you how to transact or speak. Every transaction is public, every rule consensual. Freedom thrives in open code.

    Imagine a future where your money can’t be spied on by marketing algorithms. Entrepreneurs and digital minimalists rejoice: no more endless notifications or targeted ads. Bitcoin strips away the noise.

    It returns us to essentials: privacy, security, sovereignty. This isn’t a pipe dream—it’s a moral imperative. What kind of world will you build with a currency that respects you?

    Toxicity thrives in corners; transparency smothers it. Bitcoin shines a light in the dark. When communities manage their own money, trust grows. The ledger holds everyone accountable, including ourselves. We become less cynical, more engaged. Money doesn’t have to be toxic—it can be the cure.

    Are we satisfied trading our freedom for filters and feeds? Or do we yearn for authenticity?

    Bitcoin asks: What if money served people, not corporations? This isn’t technical jargon—it’s personal. Even buying a coffee with a Bitcoin wallet is a small act of independence. It’s saying yes to sovereignty and no to surveillance.

    Bit by bit, Bitcoin reshapes culture. It rewards patience, not pandemonium. It honors privacy, not perfidious algorithms. It decouples our value from viral outrage.

    Think long term, think community. The code invites us to create our own rules, to dream beyond the toxic status quo. Lead with principles, follow with code.

    This journey isn’t easy. We carry the torch through skepticism and doubt. Yet each block mined is a manifesto: we choose a kinder system.

    Entrepreneurs, are you building products that empower people or feed addiction? Minimalists, what clutter can you clear from your life today? The path Bitcoin offers is simple but demanding: truth over sensationalism, substance over noise.

    In the end, Bitcoin is more than money; it’s a mindset. It’s a vote of confidence in human collaboration over division. It’s a refusal to let invisible hands profit from our distraction. The glow of the blockchain reminds us that integrity wins in the long run.

    So ask yourself: will you stay mired in the toxic scroll, or will you stand for something better?

    We have a choice. Bitcoin isn’t just for anarchists or coders—it’s for anyone who dreams of a healthier digital culture. When trust is built in code, toxicity loses its power. When money is honest, we can be honest too.

    The revolution is written in the open ledger of history. If not us, then who? If not now, then when?

  • Greenpeace and Sierra Club vs. Bitcoin: Funding and Campaigns

    Several recent campaigns (notably “Change the Code, Not the Climate”) have spotlighted Bitcoin’s energy use, and crypto advocates have accused environmental NGOs of being “paid” to attack Bitcoin.  However, evidence shows only one NGO – Greenpeace USA – accepted a major climate-focused donation linked to Bitcoin, while the Sierra Club itself received no such earmarked funding.  In March 2022, Greenpeace USA and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) launched a public campaign calling for Bitcoin’s code to change from energy‐intensive proof‐of‐work to a low‐energy consensus.  That effort was backed by a $5 million grant from Ripple co‑founder Chris Larsen (via his climate foundation) .  (Larsen publicly confirmed he contributed $5 million, and Greenpeace/EWG officials called his foundation the “initial funder” of the campaign .)  By contrast, the Sierra Club organization did not receive any known crypto‐industry funding for anti‑Bitcoin advocacy.  In fact, Coindesk reports that while Earthjustice, Sierra Club and other groups signed a climate letter on Bitcoin mining, none of them participated in Larsen’s funded advertising campaign .  The Sierra Club’s role has been limited to partnering on regulatory letters and reports about mining (see below), not in the code‑change advertising funded by Larsen.

    Larsen’s donation was widely publicized by press outlets in 2022.  For example, The Washington Post noted Larsen “contributed $5 million to launch” the campaign with Greenpeace and others .  E&E News similarly reported the campaign’s “initial funding is from the foundation of Chris Larsen” .  Larsen himself later clarified that Ripple (the company) did not directly fund the campaign – it was a personal, climate‑philanthropy initiative of his – but Greenpeace and partners were clear that his money paid for their ads to highlight Bitcoin’s carbon footprint .  In sum, only Greenpeace (and allied EWG) took Larsen’s money for this campaign; Sierra Club did not.

    Image: Fossil‐fuel power plant; Bitcoin mining often relies on such plants for electricity. Enormous server farms (“mines”) drive up energy use and emissions. (Photo: Coindesk) .

    Public Messaging Over Time: Greenpeace vs. Sierra Club

    Greenpeace USA

    Greenpeace USA has consistently highlighted Bitcoin’s energy waste and pushed for change.  In early 2022, Greenpeace co‑led the “Change the Code, Not the Climate” campaign .  Its March 2022 press release decried that “Bitcoin’s growing greenhouse gas pollution” must be stopped by pushing miners to alter Bitcoin’s proof‐of‐work code .  Greenpeace’s Chief Programs Officer Tefere Gebre said: “No matter how you feel about Bitcoin, pushing those with the power to ensure a code change will make our planet … safer from the destructive impacts of climate change. What we do have is a solution: Change the Code. Not the Climate.” .  Greenpeace joined with local mining opponents to place ads (e.g. in the Wall Street Journal, NY Times, Politico) calling out high‐profile Bitcoin advocates and urging code reform .  The tone was unambiguously urgent and climate‑focused. (Greenpeace emphasized it was not anti‑cryptocurrency per se: its “Myth vs. Fact” page later insisted “We are not against cryptocurrency. We are against the destruction of our climate” .)

    After Ethereum’s successful move to proof‑of‑stake, Greenpeace broadened its critique.  In 2024, Greenpeace USA released a detailed report (“Mining for Power”) linking Bitcoin mining firms to fossil‑fuel and climate‑denier interests .  The report reiterated that Bitcoin mining now emits as much CO₂ as some industrial countries and is mainly powered by coal, oil and gas .  Greenpeace framed Bitcoin as propping up dirty power plants and “magnifying energy and climate justice harms in our communities” .  It also noted a shift in emphasis: beyond calling for code change, Greenpeace now stresses regulatory action and public awareness of mining’s grid strain .  (For example, Greenpeace has criticized recent U.S. approvals of Bitcoin ETFs, calling them a “loss for the climate” .)

    Throughout, Greenpeace’s messaging remained that PoW Bitcoin is an environmental problem.  It has published multiple analyses and campaigns (press releases, social media, reports) highlighting Bitcoin’s electricity use.  Its tone stayed consistently critical of Bitcoin’s energy impact, even as it adjusted strategy from technical code fixes to broader legislative and activist campaigns.  In each case Greenpeace cited climate science and recent research (e.g. Cambridge University data) to argue Bitcoin’s energy draw is alarming .

    Sierra Club (and allied groups)

    The Sierra Club as an organization has been far less publicly visible on Bitcoin than Greenpeace.  Its former leader, Michael Brune (who stepped down as Sierra Club President in 2020), helped initiate the 2022 campaign as a private citizen and advisor.  Sierra Club itself did not run ads or host the campaign – Brune worked with EWG/Greenpeace in his post-Sierra role .  (A Sierra Club press contact confirmed the organization did not join the Larsen‑funded ads .)

    However, Sierra Club has endorsed the overall climate concerns about crypto mining.  In March 2023, Sierra Club joined Earthjustice to publish The Energy Bomb, a comprehensive guide on cryptocurrency mining’s environmental harms .  In that press release, Sierra Club attorneys and partners warned that Bitcoin mining “relies on the dirtiest sources of energy” and accused the industry of a “relentless greenwashing campaign” .  A Sierra Club advisor quoted said Bitcoin mining in the U.S. generated “three times more emissions than the nation’s largest coal plant” in a year .  The focus here was on promoting strong regulation (moratoria, better permitting, utility controls) rather than on code changes.  In practice, Sierra Club’s tone has been consistent: it views PoW mining as a harmful industry that should be curtailed, aligning with its broader climate advocacy.

    In summary, Sierra Club’s public statements on Bitcoin mainly occurred in coalition with other climate groups.  It never wavered in calling for crypto mining transparency and restrictions, but it never suggested it was paid or shifted tone to become favorable.  The Sierra Club’s messaging remained framed as protecting communities and emissions goals (e.g. supporting New York’s cryptomining moratorium) – decidedly not a backtrack or pro‑Bitcoin stance.

    Image: Greenpeace and allies at an environmental protest (2019).  The organization’s recent Bitcoin campaigns have similarly used visual activism (e.g. “Skull of Satoshi” art) to dramatize cryptocurrency’s climate impact. (Photo: CCN) .

    Campaign Context, Partnerships and PR

    The most prominent campaign, “Change the Code, Not the Climate,” was a joint initiative of the Environmental Working Group (EWG), Greenpeace USA, and a coalition of state/local clean-energy organizations.  Launched in March 2022, it mobilized high-profile backers and media to pressure Bitcoin investors (like Jack Dorsey’s Block or Tesla) to call for code change .  At its press conference and in ads, the group deployed creative tactics: for example, an 11‑foot “Skull of Satoshi” sculpture (by Greenpeace with artist Benjamin Von Wong) toured the U.S. to symbolize Bitcoin’s coal plants.  Funders included Larsen’s donation plus smaller climate foundations and public donations – the campaign even set up a website (cleanupbitcoin.com) for supporters .

    Importantly, key climate NGOs worked together: Greenpeace USA, EWG, Earthjustice and allied local groups all lent names and outreach.  The Greenpeace/EWG press release listed speakers from multiple groups (Greenpeace, EWG, PennFuture, Kentucky Conservation, etc.) and explicitly named Michael Brune (ex‑Sierra Club) and Ripple’s Larsen on the panel .  The Coindesk news article noted that, beyond the ad campaign, the coalition sent a policy letter to the White House calling for Bitcoin mining regulations .  (That letter was signed by EWG and Greenpeace and also by Sierra Club, Earthjustice and others – but the latter groups did not join the Larsen-funded ad buy .)

    In essence, the campaigns blended advocacy and media outreach.  Greenpeace and partners took out full-page digital ads in outlets like the Wall Street Journal and Politico saying “Bitcoin: Proof that Money Isn’t Always Green” .  They organized protests and art installations (e.g. Greenpeace activists overlaying crypto imagery on coal plant photos).  According to analysts, these efforts were explicitly timed to influence policymakers and industry leaders (e.g. during U.S. regulatory reviews of crypto) .  The result was extensive press coverage (from Bloomberg and the WP to crypto media) and heated online debate.  Yet aside from this one campaign, neither Greenpeace nor Sierra Club had previously run large-scale Bitcoin‐specific PR, nor have they continued major advertising campaigns since 2022 – Greenpeace has focused on research reports and public education (like the 2024 “Mining for Power” report ).

    Counterarguments and Controversies

    Bitcoin advocates have fiercely contested these campaigns.  The crypto community’s main argument is twofold: they claim climate NGOs misrepresent Bitcoin’s energy use and that the code-change demand is unrealistic or driven by rival interests.  For example, researchers like Daniel Batten have publicly (via Twitter) labeled the Greenpeace reports as “misinformation” .  They point to Cambridge University data showing a rising share of mining powered by renewables or flared gas, which they argue Greenpeace understates.  Indeed, Larsen himself later tweeted that Bitcoin’s mining had “remarkable” growth in renewable energy use (as a follow-up to the campaign) .

    Another common rebuttal is technical: critics note that switching Bitcoin from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake would fundamentally change its design.  Coin Center’s Jerry Brito told The Washington Post that “proof-of-work and proof-of-stake are not interchangeable” and that a code change would require consensus from thousands of miners and node operators .  In other words, critics say Greenpeace’s proposed solution is politically unachievable.  Crypto proponents also argue that Bitcoin mining can help integrate renewables (by buying stranded hydro or flared gas) and that touting a PoW ban overlooks these benefits.

    There is also suspicion of motives.  The involvement of a Ripple executive fueled accusations that Greenpeace’s campaign was effectively a paid attack by a Bitcoin competitor.  Indeed, some threads on social media branded Larsen “Judas” for backing a Bitcoin campaign .  However, mainstream coverage notes that Larsen’s goals (and funding) were openly disclosed, and Ripple’s PR representatives stressed this was Larsen’s personal initiative, not Ripple Corp. .  Greenpeace itself dismisses the idea of being anti-crypto or company-funded, stressing its independence.  (In its myth‑vs‑fact FAQ, Greenpeace argues it is funded by ordinary donors, not by crypto firms, and that it supports efficient consensus models in principle .)

    In summary, the claim that “Greenpeace and Sierra Club were paid to attack Bitcoin” is mostly misleading.  It conflates two things: (a) Greenpeace’s acceptance of Larsen’s climate‑grant for a high‑profile ad campaign, and (b) the unfounded notion that Sierra Club was similarly “bought.”  The truth is that only Greenpeace (with EWG) ran a funded anti‑Bitcoin media campaign, and it openly credited Larsen’s $5M grant .  Sierra Club’s messaging on Bitcoin has been limited to collaborative reports and has not involved any disclosed crypto‑industry funding.  Both NGOs have consistently framed Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mining as an environmental risk, albeit with different emphases: Greenpeace targets the code and public pressure, whereas Sierra Club (with Earthjustice) has focused on regulation and community impacts .

    Sources: News reports and official releases from The Washington Post, E&E News (Politico), CoinDesk, Environmental Working Group, Greenpeace USA, Earthjustice/Sierra Club, and other reputable outlets . These sources document the funding, partnerships, public statements and critiques surrounding the “Change the Code” campaign and related Bitcoin mining debates.

  • $4.1M

    Hyper fit,   ,,, I’m *too* fit?

    Bitcoin is appreciating *FASTER* than the SP… forever. 

    The cost to capital 

    Digital credit 

    Higher yield 

    Amplified bitcoin l,,with yield with cash flows!

    .

    Give Bitcoin cash flows 

    Give equity 

    .

    Cash flow 

    The goal is to have a baby!

    .

    12.9% yield!

    I trust MSTU, MSTX —> because ,,, MSTR strategy is the bedrock 

    .

    Bitcoin has no credit risk 

    Extract the yield —>  10%

    Treasury preferred … AI

    .

    With Bitcoin anything is possible 

    Male vs female physiology 

    .

    Orange ,,, with blue rims 

    .

    Raise capital at a ferocious rate 

    Black sienna is the new limo.?

    .

    Hyper growth 

    .

    Too much options 

    This isn’t even a person ,,, this is a bot! Cyber guerrilla marketing 

    Paid protest, paid protestor?

    .

    Civil unrest is being paid for ***

    Peace will bitcoin 

    Bitcoin is anti toxic 

    .

  • Bitcoin is anti-toxic

    A greater moral imperative… If in fact it is true that bitcoin is antitoxic, and that it could address a lot of of the toxic social social media decay in the planet, and in the world… Perhaps perhaps I should campaign for bitcoin harder.

  • OVERFIT

    I’m over-fit

  • Become the monster

    .

    Particular solution to differential equation

    .

    simple investment strategy like buying a high-quality property and holding
    it forever.

    They don’t generate income

    They never paid capital gains

    Borrow money against it

    Outlive

    Criticality

    What does the world really need?

    .

    Over-fit

  • Michael Saylor is a bitcoin god!

    .

    bitcoin god!

    .

    MSTR is …. the foundation

    Michael Saylor is the apex predator.

    How to become more apex predator?

    .

    The most successful assets are digital 

    .

    How did Eric Kim become such a successful digital photographer?

    .

    Write a very glowing report and analysis summary and review of this book in the voice of ERIC KIM the bitcoin blogger maximalist

    Control. Controller!

    .

    Non crippled.

    Create me a brand new innovative company idea in which instead of trying to buy a single-family house you could buy a full Bitcoin mortgage company.

    You’ll be around forever

    .

    How to bankrupt yourself

    .

    Just don’t go bankrupt ***

    .

    I don’t believe in butcoin dividends ***

    The yen, euro, the dollar weak currency –> 0% to 4% … 400 basis points,,, to credit investors

    Buy the equity –> to get Bitcoin yield *** BTC YIELD

    safely in the equity

    ,

    .

    30% BTC YIELD next decade impossible to promise.

    ,

    Don’t borrow money at 60% a year, and get 80% return … bomb

    .

    You’re not smarter than Michael Saylor

    .

    I’m not !

    .

    .

    Right way risk

    .

    Custodial risk don’t lose the bitcoin ***–> risk free way to generate yield ***

    ..

    Sell credit instruments

    .

    Double long bitcoin MSTR

    4x Bitcoin is MSTU, MSTX.

    No cash flows!

  • Eric Kim’s “Insanely Hyper Healthy” Lifestyle

    Eric Kim – originally known as a street photography blogger – has become equally notable for his intensely health-conscious lifestyle. He often speaks of striving beyond ordinary wellness to a state of “hyper health.” In his words, “Hyper strength, mental strength, physical strength” define true health . From an extreme all-meat diet to rigorous daily exercise and disciplined mental habits, Kim’s routine has earned him a reputation for being “insanely hyper healthy.” He emphasizes that peak health is the foundation for productivity and happiness – “If you are insanely healthy, productivity will come naturally” . Below is a detailed look at the key components of Eric Kim’s hyper-healthy lifestyle, with insights from his own writings and content.

    Carnivore Diet and Intermittent Fasting

    All-Meat “Demigod” Diet: Kim follows what he calls a 100% carnivore or “ancestral” diet focused almost entirely on red meat and animal fats. He eats only red meats (preferring beef or lamb) along with eggs and organ meats like beef liver, bone marrow, and intestines . “Eat for power. Steak. Eggs. Bone marrow… Eat ancestral. Eat animal. Eat with purpose. Every bite is a sacrifice to your future self,” he writes, stressing that he “forgets macros” and eats to fuel strength and hormones rather than count calories . Virtually all carbohydrates are banned: he completely avoids sugar, grains, starches, fruits, and even most vegetables, believing these cause fat gain and metabolic damage . The only plant matter he occasionally permits are bitter leafy greens (collards, kale, mustard greens) for micronutrients . He drinks only plain water and black coffee, and never consumes alcohol, soda, or sweetened drinks (“No alcohol, no weed” is an explicit rule) . This ultra-restrictive nutrition plan – which he proudly dubs the “Demigod diet” – is high-fat, high-protein, and virtually zero-carb, resembling a strict paleo or ketogenic regimen taken to the extreme .

    One Meal a Day (OMAD) Fasting: A cornerstone of Kim’s diet is intermittent fasting. He skips breakfast and lunch entirely and eats just one massive meal a day, usually in the evening . “No breakfast, no lunch, only one massive 100% carnivore dinner,” he says of his daily routine . Kim has followed this One Meal a Day (OMAD) pattern for years, believing it optimizes his energy and keeps body fat low . When he does “break the fast” at dinnertime, he aims to consume a huge quantity of meat – often 4–5 pounds of fatty red meat in a single sitting . By eating only once in 24 hours and cutting out all sugar and starch, he strives to minimize insulin spikes and keep his metabolism in a fat-burning state . Kim argues this approach makes staying lean almost effortless: “Body fat is 100% diet… abstain from all sugars, starches, vegetables, fruits… keeping a low body fat percentage is very easy. Also, intermittent fasting.” . He credits fasting with boosting his mental clarity and productivity during the day since he isn’t slowed down by meals. Notably, he even performs intense workouts in a fasted state; Kim boasts that he might be “the only one who lifts insanely heavy weights at the gym without having consumed anything [beforehand]” – aside from water or an espresso . In short, his eating philosophy is “one big ass meal a day” of nutrient-dense animal foods, and absolutely nothing else.

    Intense Powerlifting and Daily Movement

    Heavy Weightlifting (“God Physiology”): The centerpiece of Kim’s fitness routine is powerlifting-style weight training with maximal loads. He trains with an almost fanatic intensity, focusing on one-rep max lifts and very heavy weights rather than high reps or cardio. In his colorful terms, “You don’t lift to burn calories – you lift to bend physics” . He often attempts extreme feats like

    rack-pulling over 1000 pounds to push his limits . Kim refers to his pursuit of peak strength as “God Physiology,” a nearly mythic level of physical prowess. “You don’t train for aesthetics. You don’t train for health. You train to become an apex being – a walking monument to discipline, pain, and power,” he proclaims . This means embracing very intense, even painful workouts. He will load the bar with as much weight as possible (sometimes using “nano reps,” or partial range of motion lifts at supramaximal weights) to shock his muscles and nervous system . Kim rejects the notion of moderating effort – he famously writes that “overtraining is for the weak” and that one should go to war in the gym every day . (In practice, he does allow rest days, but his ethos is to always push the boundaries of strength.) Notably, he does no traditional cardio exercise like running or cycling; in fact, he mocks it with lines like “Gods don’t do cardio. Gods rack pull 1,005 pounds.” His focus is purely on building muscle, strength, and powerlifting performance – for example, maintaining the ability to deadlift 500+ pounds even into old age is one of his stated goals . Kim also avoids reliance on weight belts or support gear and claims to train 100% naturally (no steroids or even protein supplements), fueling his muscle gains only with meat and intense effort . He believes any average person can become strong and muscular through hard work, calling it the “ultimate democratic approach” since it’s more about discipline than genetics .

    Daily Walking and “Functional” Movement: Aside from heavy lifting, Kim’s other key exercise is simply walking – a lot. He is a big proponent of staying active all day through natural movement. Kim often walks 15,000–20,000 steps per day, sometimes more, and uses a standing desk to avoid prolonged sitting . He considers walking not only good low-intensity exercise but also a creative and mental health practice. “If I can put one factor which improves my mood and health the most, it is walking,” he says – the more he walks, “the more creative thoughts I get. The happier I am… the more photos I shoot!” . Many of his ideas for writing and art come during long walks . Kim’s philosophy is to integrate movement into daily life: he’ll do bodyweight exercises or kettlebell swings at the park, sprint up hills, and generally prefer outdoor, functional workouts over being confined to a treadmill . Even his footwear and posture are intentional – he often wears minimalist or barefoot-style shoes and practices walking “tall and proud” to cultivate a strong presence . In a photography context, he even tells students to move with confidence: “Walk tall… you are the street god… the environment adapts to you”, believing that an upright posture projects courage . This blend of frequent low-intensity activity (like walking everywhere) and occasional all-out high-intensity lifting defines his training approach. By keeping his body in motion throughout the day and pushing it to the limit in the gym, Kim aims to stay “physically mighty and capable in the real world, not just on paper.” As he puts it, he trains for functional strength and longevity – “I want high muscle mass, low body fat, and to be physically/mentally strong even at 80+ years old” .

    Hormesis and Extreme Wellness Practices

    Embracing Discomfort (Cold and Heat Exposure): A distinctive aspect of Kim’s regimen is hormesis – the idea that exposing oneself to small stressors and extremes makes the body stronger. He deliberately incorporates various challenges to toughen himself. For example, he advocates taking cold showers and ice baths, as well as subjecting himself to “brutal” heat like intense sunshine or daily sauna sessions . “Each rep in the gym [is] a message to your DNA: evolve or die,” Kim writes, and he extends that mentality to other stresses: “blazing sun, brutal heat, fasting – any challenge to shock the body into growing stronger” . Every day, he visits a hot sauna (steam room) at the gym and treats it like meditation: “I consider it like my zen focus chamber, in which I come up with lots of creative ideas,” he says . Sweating in the 200°F heat, he believes, may also naturally boost beneficial hormones (and he notes some research suggesting heat therapy has health benefits) . On the flip side, he occasionally does “ice cold” showers or plunges to jolt his system. This thermal oscillation – “embracing both ice cold and very hot” – is one of his longevity tips . Kim treats these discomforts as training for the mind and body, building resilience. He even likens hard training and cold exposure to a kind of religious or warrior practice, stating that to forge a “godlike” body, one must “reject comfort” and constantly push beyond one’s cozy limits .

    Recovery, Rest, and Minimalism: Despite his hardcore mantras, Kim recognizes the importance of recovery and balance in the long run. In his blogging he notes that after becoming a father, he had to listen to his body more: if extremely fatigued, he will prioritize sleep or family time over a workout . He even observed that some top athletes (like wrestler-turned-actor John Cena) only lift weights three days a week, which made Kim consider that “perhaps working out less frequently, but with higher intensity, is better” for sustainable health . In one entry he advised himself and readers: “When in doubt, don’t work out… Just eat more meat and let your body recover. It actually takes more discipline to force yourself not to work out, than to work out.” . This shows a nuanced side to his philosophy: rest itself can be a discipline, and the goal is not to punish the body recklessly but to optimize long-term “physiological energy” .

    Kim’s wellness practices also extend to lifestyle choices that reduce stress. He is a vocal proponent of digital minimalism and avoiding negative media. Consuming news or social media, he argues, inundates people with stress hormones (dopamine, cortisol, etc.) and weakens mental well-being . “Abstain from media… I’m 1000× happier, more focused, and more positive,” he says of cutting out sensational news and mindless internet browsing . In 2017 he famously deleted his Instagram account, citing the platform’s toxic impact on his psyche and focus. “Instagram was getting in the way of creating – in terms of time and mental health – so I’m eliminating it from my life,” he explained . By freeing himself from the noise of external media and constant comparison, he protects his mental clarity. Kim instead journals prolifically on his blog and spends time on in-person experiences (photography walks, conversations) that he finds fulfilling . Additionally, he follows common-sense health precautions to safeguard his well-being: for example, in pursuit of extreme longevity, he avoids unnecessary risks like texting while driving, riding motorcycles, or other dangerous activities that could cut life short . All of these practices – from hot saunas and cold showers to digital detox and sufficient sleep – are geared toward maintaining a low-stress, high-vitality life. Kim strives to keep his hormonal and mental state as optimized as his physical condition, believing that “mental health is bodily health” and must be nurtured with equal care .

    Mindset, Mental Health, and Daily Outlook

    Optimism Through Physical Vigor: Central to Eric Kim’s mental health approach is the idea that a strong body breeds a strong mind. He repeatedly notes that improving his physical condition directly elevates his mood, confidence, and creativity. “The healthier I am, the more optimistic, hopeful, and creatively productive I am,” he says as a personal rule . By transforming his body, he found his mindset became more positive and resilient. This is one reason he prioritizes intense exercise each day – not just for muscles, but for the mental gains. In his experience, building muscle and endurance has “hyper-charged” his ambition and productivity in work and art . One of his slogans is “More muscle, more productivity,” suggesting the extra energy and confidence from fitness allow him to create more and better content . He explains that with greater physical vigor, he can walk longer to take photos, write for hours without fatigue, and simply “attack” his day with more enthusiasm . Thus, exercise doubles as mental training – each cold morning run or difficult lift conquered is a boost to his self-esteem and mental toughness. Kim draws a direct line between discipline in the gym and discipline in life: the grit required to do things like 5AM workouts, freezing showers, or resisting junk food translates into greater courage and focus in creative endeavors . He even frames mundane healthy habits as sharpening his mind’s edge: “Discipline in the mundane fuels godlike focus behind the lens,” he writes, arguing that by overcoming small daily challenges, one becomes mentally equipped to handle larger tasks or artistic risks .

    Purpose, Creativity, and Joy: Another key to Kim’s mental wellness is having a sense of purpose and creative outlet. He believes that excitement and passion keep you psychologically young. In fact, one of his “longevity secrets” is to stay excited about life – to keep traveling, learning, exploring, creating art, and teaching others well into old age . This zest for life fuels his mental health. Kim has built his career around what he loves (photography, writing, teaching workshops), and he often encourages others to find their “creative mission” and pursue it relentlessly. His own daily blogging is a form of reflection and mental exercise. By writing down his thoughts and sharing ideas, he keeps his mind engaged and clear. Street photography, too, has been cited by Kim as therapeutic: going out for a photowalk, he suggests, is good for the “heart and soul” because it forces one to be present, observant, and appreciative of the world . In a post on mental well-being, he asserts that we should treat mental health as physical health – i.e. work on strengthening the mind just as one would strengthen the body . For him, this means training positivity and courage through daily habits (like maintaining good posture, as mentioned, to “project confidence” and actually feel more confident ). He even has a somewhat primal take on confidence: he writes that a fit, upright posture and “godly” physique can create an aura that influences others and boosts one’s own mental state – “People feel your weight before you speak… you radiate conviction.” . By literally carrying himself like a someone who is strong and fearless, he reinforces that mindset internally.

    Furthermore, Kim’s approach to mental health involves minimizing negativity and maximizing gratitude. While he doesn’t use traditional terms like “mindfulness” often, many of his practices (walking outside, sauna contemplation, journaling) are mindful in effect. He prefers focusing on what he can control – his daily effort, his body, his art – rather than stewing over world events or social media noise. This stoic, self-focused outlook helps him avoid anxiety. He also believes in surrounding himself with positive influences: he notes that spending time with enthusiastic younger people is invigorating, whereas cynicism can be infectious. “I far prefer talking to college kids than ‘young urban professionals’”, he says, half-jokingly, because their optimism rubs off on him . By curating his environment and habits to be conducive to growth, Kim maintains a remarkably upbeat mental state. In summary, his mental health “habits” boil down to physical rigor, creative passion, and selective input – by training hard, creating daily, and avoiding mental junk food, he keeps his mind as “hyper healthy” as his body.

    Philosophies: Body as Temple, Weapon, and Manifesto

    Underlying all of Eric Kim’s lifestyle choices is a bold philosophy about the body. In his view, caring for one’s physique is not just vanity or fitness – it is a moral and existential pursuit. He often declares that “Physique is a philosophy” and that one’s body reflects one’s character and values . Kim draws inspiration from ancient heroes (like Hercules or Spartan warriors) to illustrate what he calls “bodily virtue.” He sees the human body as “the apex beauty” of creation, something to be sculpted to its maximum potential . “Your body is your temple – and your weapon, your suit of armor, your loudest idea,” he writes, arguing that how you treat your body is a form of self-expression and personal art . In fact, he literally compares bodybuilding to art: just as an artist chisels a statue, you should “treat your body as sculpture,” with each workout adding a brushstroke to the masterpiece . This almost reverent attitude toward physicality frames his relentless diet and training as a philosophical mission: to make himself into the best, strongest version possible.

    Kim controversially asserts that physical virtues underpin all other virtues. He has written that traditional moral qualities (honesty, kindness, etc.) or even intellect mean little if one’s body is weak and neglected . “Let us put more focus and respect on our body… than on lofty metaphysical things like ‘virtue’ and ‘mind/soul’,” he wrote in one essay . He even quipped, “The mind is overrated; the body is king,” rejecting the dualist idea that the soul or mind is separate from the flesh . In Kim’s view, body and soul are one – “Your body is your soul, and your soul is your body” – so taking supreme care of your physical self is actually a spiritual duty. He preaches a sort of embodied humanism: rather than seeking meaning in an afterlife or in abstract ideals, he finds meaning in pushing the limits of one’s own bodily existence. This philosophy comes through in his notion of becoming “godlike” through effort – not that one becomes a literal deity, but that by attaining peak physical and mental condition, you realize a higher form of human potential . He writes in near-mythic terms about this: to achieve “an apex level of physical and mental excellence” is to reflect a bit of the divine. “God is not in the heavens. God is in the mirror,” Kim states, meaning that your highest self is something you build and see in your own reflection through hard work .

    Such ideas naturally attract both admirers and critics. Kim’s stance can be provocative, especially when he talks about body fat and discipline. For instance, he has bluntly said “Your body is a billboard of your habits” – implying that obesity signals laziness or lack of self-control . In a notorious post, he admitted, “I don’t trust fat people,” arguing that if someone cannot take care of their own body, it’s hard to trust them with other responsibilities . “Your body is not just a shell – it’s your manifesto. If you don’t respect your own body, why should I believe you’ll respect anything else?” he writes, encapsulating his view that physical self-mastery is the first proof of one’s character . Statements like these are intentionally harsh (he concedes it’s a “brutal… primal” instinct ), but they stem from his core philosophy linking moral strength to physical strength. Kim challenges people to transform themselves if they want self-respect or respect from others: “If you hate that I distrust you [for being out of shape], earn my trust… Show me discipline in your habits… Push through the pain.” . In essence, he treats the gym and diet as a proving ground for virtues like willpower, courage, and persistence. Achieving a lean, muscular body – in his eyes – requires sacrifice and consistency, the same qualities needed to achieve anything great in life.

    At its heart, Eric Kim’s ethos is one of radical self-responsibility and empowerment through the body. He urges people to take charge of their destiny by first taking charge of their physique. “The body is the linchpin of a good and great life,” he writes; to him, physical health is the foundation that supports all other aspects of living well . He invites readers to view their own body as “a reflection of [your] values and effort – a ‘manifesto’ written in flesh.” . Accordingly, he preaches never settling for mediocrity in oneself. “Sculpt yourself (literally and figuratively) into something extraordinary, and never settle for being merely average,” Kim urges emphatically . The hyperbolic language (about demigods and warriors) is meant to inspire an extreme form of accountability: you are the art you create of yourself. And by relentlessly working on your body – through hard exercise, disciplined eating, upright posture, and tough habits – you forge the qualities needed to excel in any arena. As he bluntly puts it, “Trust isn’t handed out – it’s earned. And your body is one of the first résumés people scan. So shape it. Sharpen it.” . In other words, how you physically present yourself tells the story of your work ethic before you even speak.

    While some find his approach extreme, Eric Kim’s commitment to this “insanely healthy” lifestyle has clearly struck a chord with those seeking motivation. His message is ultimately one of self-empowerment: greatness requires sacrifice, and caring for your body is a tangible first step toward any greater ambition. By treating the body as both temple and weapon, Kim suggests we can unlock a “hyper” level of life – more energy, more confidence, more years alive, and more ability to leave a mark. “Each individual, through willpower and work, can reflect a bit of the divine by realizing their highest potential,” he writes . In the gospel of Eric Kim, becoming “insanely hyper healthy” isn’t just about six-pack abs or deadlift records; it’s about proving to yourself that you have the discipline, strength, and spirit to shape your own destiny – health as a form of personal freedom and power.

    Sources: Direct quotes and information are drawn from Eric Kim’s own blog posts and essays (e.g. “Why Health?”, “The Eric Kim Diet”, “God Physiology”, “How to Live to 140”, etc.) and an analytical summary of his philosophy on his website , as well as statements he has made in videos and interviews. These primary sources illustrate how Kim lives and advocates his hyper-healthy lifestyle in his own words. All emphasis on his philosophies and routines is grounded in those published writings and media. The result is a portrait of a man who has turned his life into an experiment in pushing the limits of health – aiming not just to live, but to “live abundantly” in a body honed to its peak .

  • Eric Kim on Bitcoin and Blogging Philosophy

    Eric Kim is a prominent street photographer and prolific blogger known for his candid writing on photography, life, and technology. In recent years he has become outspoken about Bitcoin and cryptocurrency on his blog, while also sharing insights into his approach to blogging and content creation. Below is a detailed look at Kim’s views on Bitcoin, his blogging philosophy, and some key quotes that encapsulate his perspectives.

    Bitcoin Views

    Eric Kim has devoted a significant portion of his blog to cryptocurrency topics – his site even features a Bitcoin symbol in the header and a dedicated “BITCOIN” category . Through numerous posts (often tagged “Crypto by Kim”), he lays out a passionate yet pragmatic view of Bitcoin and crypto. Kim finds crypto technology “fascinating because it is new, sexy, unorthodox, and interesting” . He is drawn to the edgy, optimistic, almost anarchic spirit around Bitcoin – describing crypto as “edgy, optimistic, radical, and bold. Also a bit reckless.” At the same time, he recognizes that many people are in it just to “get really really rich, really really fast,” a mindset he critiques since crypto wealth often remains only on paper until cashed out .

    Investment Philosophy: Despite his enthusiasm, Kim preaches caution and long-term thinking in crypto speculation. His “general strategy towards crypto” is encapsulated in a simple rule: “Only put money into crypto, assuming that it will go to zero.” In other words, one should never invest more than one is willing to lose entirely. Kim cites Nassim Taleb’s barbell strategy – he keeps the bulk of his savings in safe assets (like high-yield savings) and only a small portion (around 10%) in highly speculative bets such as Bitcoin and other coins . In one post he recounts following this approach: initially dabbling in altcoins (Digibyte, Dogecoin, Chainlink) but eventually “transferring it all 100% back into Bitcoin” . He actually enjoys Bitcoin’s famous price volatility that many fear, noting that unlike stocks, with crypto “you will never see a 10X gain, a 100X gain, or even a 1000x gain” unless you embrace the wild swings . Rather than seeing volatility as danger, he views it as energy and opportunity – acknowledging you could “win it all, or… lose it all,” hence the importance of not over-investing .

    Belief in Bitcoin’s Future: Kim’s writings convey a bullish outlook on Bitcoin’s long-term value and adoption. He encourages thinking on a 30-year timeline: “in 30 years, are people going to be using crypto more or less? … in 30 years, is the price of bitcoin going to go up or down? It seems pretty obvious that it will go up.” He points to societal trends toward a cashless, digital economy – noting the rise of digital wallets and the decline of physical cash in stores – as aligning with Bitcoin’s trajectory . By 2024 he also personally began to find crypto “very very useful” for everyday life, thanks to tools like the Coinbase Visa debit card that let him spend crypto gains on “real things like meat at Costco” or easily cash out to pay rent and bills . This practical utility strengthened his conviction that Bitcoin isn’t just speculative “fun money,” but has real-world relevance.

    Bitcoin vs. Altcoins: While Kim is a self-professed Bitcoin believer, he is notably skeptical of most alternative cryptocurrencies. He bluntly advises, “Don’t trust altcoins, or alternative coins,” observing that many projects are driven by meme-hype (e.g. Dogecoin, Shiba Inu) and pump-and-dump dynamics . In his view, “everyone just wants to become the next Bitcoin” , but few altcoins have the fundamental strength or trust that Bitcoin has earned. He admits a personal fascination with Chainlink (even reading its white papers and blog) as a technology , but questions its mainstream potential. Its purpose and branding are too obscure for the average person, and even technical details like having a “version two” make him uneasy . Ultimately, Kim remains “still committed to Bitcoin” as his primary crypto holding .

    Kim often draws colorful analogies to illustrate Bitcoin’s unique cultural advantage. He notes, for example, that Bitcoin’s brand is simple and strong: even his mother can pronounce “Bitcoin,” whereas “imagine them trying to pronounce ‘Ethereum’” – a testament to Bitcoin’s universal name recognition . He also remarks on Bitcoin’s signature color: orange – “the brightest and most eye catching color,” used by traffic cones, Nike boxes, Hermès, etc. – suggesting Bitcoin has an arresting presence in the public imagination . In one blog post, he quips that “Bitcoin is like Apple…Ethereum is more like…an ugly Google Pixel or some sort of generic Samsung”, meaning Bitcoin feels like the sexy, premium brand in crypto whereas Ethereum appeals mostly to techies . Even if Ethereum or others have technical merit, he argues, they lack Bitcoin’s mainstream appeal and elegance. Consistent with this, Kim’s writings imply he sees Bitcoin as the “last crypto standing” in the long run – the one coin that will endure when others fade. In his own words, “Bitcoin shall be the last crypto standing.”

    Beyond finance, Kim muses on the philosophical and societal aspects of Bitcoin. He mused in one essay that Bitcoin’s fixed supply (21 million) and global nature give it a mythic quality – comparing it to rare “Dragon Balls” in a pop culture reference . In another post he even argued that “Bitcoin prevents war,” perhaps hinting at the idea that a decentralized, transparent monetary system could reduce geopolitical conflicts (though the full context of that claim is in a post we could not retrieve). Overall, Eric Kim’s perspective on Bitcoin is one of optimistic advocacy, tempered by realism. He embraces the bold vision of a crypto-powered future and has “skin in the game” himself, but he continually stresses personal responsibility, long-term perspective, and enjoyment of the ride rather than blind greed. As he writes, the promise of crypto is a “more brilliant future,” and he is excited to be part of it .

    Blogging Philosophy

    While known as a photographer, Eric Kim often emphasizes that first and foremost he is a blogger – in fact, he half-jokingly proclaims “I consider myself the best blogger of all time” . This bold statement reflects the pride and passion he has for blogging. He has built his career largely through relentless content creation and community engagement on his blog. By his own count, he had published over 7,000 blog posts by 2020 , and he continues to post regularly. In a 2013 interview, Kim explained he started his blog to share lessons he learned because “when I first started… I couldn’t find any information or resources on how to shoot street photography”, so he wanted to help others by filling that gap . This altruistic motive still guides his content: “I pour my heart and soul into serving the street photography community at large,” he said of his work . Indeed, Kim’s content strategy has long been to give away a wealth of information, tips, and personal insights for free, building trust and a loyal audience. (One profile of Kim summarized that he “blogs nearly every day, giving away free advice and raw insights, while selling high-value services (courses, workshops, prints) to a core fan base,” highlighting how his open-sharing approach drives his community and business in tandem .)

    Open-Source Approach: A cornerstone of Eric Kim’s blogging philosophy is the belief that ideas and knowledge should be shared openly rather than hoarded. On his website he prominently declares “ALL OPEN SOURCE EVERYTHING!” – essentially his mantra that all his content is free and available to everyone . Kim detests paywalls and restrictive content gating. In a post about virality, he advises creators to “make it easy to share” by providing direct, ungated access: “Direct downloadable links, all open source everything. No fucking paywalls, or email newsletter walls… We all hate this. Attention > email subscribers.” . This blunt quote exemplifies his stance that one’s reach and impact (attention) are more valuable than trying to capture emails or micro-monetize content. Consistent with this, Kim has released many resources at no cost – from free e-books on street photography to countless tutorials on his blog – with no strings attached. He encourages other bloggers to “Keep your ideas ‘open source’” , believing that freely sharing knowledge ultimately benefits the creator and community more than clinging to ideas for personal gain.

    Authenticity and Voice: Kim’s writing style is highly personal, unfiltered, and energetic. He often writes in a stream-of-consciousness manner, peppered with pop culture references and even profanity for emphasis. Far from academic or polished, his posts read like candid journal entries or friendly advice. Kim values authenticity above all – he writes for himself first and doesn’t shy away from controversial or contradictory thoughts. “First, 10000% authentic…you do the thing for the sake of it,” he says about creating content for intrinsic reasons . This authenticity is tied to his belief in autotelic creativity (doing it for its own sake). He openly acknowledges that over a long career, his opinions might change: “If you live long enough, and write for long enough… sooner or later you’re gonna contradict yourself.” Rather than seeing this as a problem, he embraces it as part of intellectual growth – echoing the Greek philosopher Heraclitus’ idea that all is in flux . This philosophy gives him freedom to explore ideas on the blog without fear of being wrong or inconsistent over time.

    Kim’s posts often convey a sense of playfulness and courage. He encourages treating blogging as a creative playground rather than a formal duty. “Don’t take blogging seriously. Have fun, and treat yourself like a kid on a digital playground,” he urges fellow creators . This translates to a willingness to experiment, “fuck around” with ideas, and not obsess over perfection. In fact, one of his core tips is: “Don’t strive to make anything ‘good’. Just have fun with it! Freestyle it! Fuck around with it!” . By removing the pressure to be perfect or always profound, Kim maintains a prodigious output and an enthusiastic tone in his writing. He often writes as ideas strike him, even if that means publishing a half-finished thought. One technique he uses is to publish a new post as soon as he has a title or idea, then update it live: “I hit ‘Publish’ and continue to write and add to it, clicking ‘Update’ as I go… I treat blogging like live-mind-streaming.” . This spontaneity keeps his content feeling raw and real, like a conversation with the reader in real time.

    Discipline and Process: Despite the carefree attitude, Eric Kim is very disciplined in leveraging his creativity. He mentions practical habits that support his blogging: using a standing desk to stay alert, typing extremely fast (120-150 WPM) so he can get ideas down as quickly as he thinks them, and even listening to music (like classic hip hop) to get into a flow state . Crucially, he recommends “get it 80% good enough, then hit publish” – quoting Steve Jobs’ adage that “Great artists ship.” . Spending endless hours to perfect a post yields diminishing returns; it’s better to put the work out at 80% and move on to the next idea than to chase an impossible 100% perfection . Kim practices what he preaches: he’d rather publish multiple posts per day, riding bursts of inspiration, than over-polish one piece. He also manages consistency by batching content – for example, writing 1–5 posts in a single inspired day and scheduling them to drip out daily . This creates a “steady stream of content” without forcing himself to write when he’s not in the mood . He advises creators that it’s okay to take breaks and let the mind “replenish” like fallow soil . In short, his approach balances prolific output with sustainable practice: write furiously when inspired, rest when needed, but remain present by using scheduling tools.

    Philosophy and Motivation: Underlying Eric Kim’s blogging practice is a set of motivational and philosophical principles he often shares with readers. One recurring theme is courage – he implores creatives to have the courage to express their ideas and stand by them . He also emphasizes self-empowerment: the idea that you shouldn’t wait for anyone’s permission or approval to create. (One of his blog post titles is literally “ASKING FOR PERMISSION IS FOR SUCKERS.” ) Kim often tells his audience to “choose yourself” and take control of their creative destiny, rather than hoping for external validation. He also speaks about information and knowledge sharing almost in moral terms. For Kim, spreading knowledge freely is a virtuous cycle; he once wrote that he’s “passionate about information” and the free flow of ideas (a concept tied to his open-source ethos).

    Another principle Kim shares is the idea of blogging as a tool for thinking and personal growth. Writing, for him, is not just about broadcasting ideas but clarifying his own thoughts. “As I blog, I am better able to think, and explicate my thoughts…. Blogging is augmented thinking.” He often encourages readers to start their own blog as a form of self-discovery and empowerment. In a crypto-related essay, after giving life advice like walking 50 miles a day and lifting weights, his next tip is simply: “Start blogging! Bluehost.com and install WordPress.org…” – as if blogging were as essential to a good life as exercise and sunlight. This reflects how strongly he believes in the value of sharing one’s voice online.

    Finally, Kim’s blogging philosophy circles back to community and generosity. He frequently features other photographers on his site and has organized meet-ups and workshops to bring people together. In his interview with PetaPixel, he clarified that “My blog isn’t me talking from a throne, pretending like I am the best and know everything…. What I do offer in my blog is my personal real life experiences… my personal difficulties, doubts, and what I have learned” . This humility and openness to learning is key to his approach: he positions himself as a fellow traveler on the creative journey, not an untouchable expert. By sharing failures and doubts along with successes, he makes his content more relatable and useful. He even describes himself “less of a teacher and more of a facilitator” in the community , showing that his goal is to inspire and enable others rather than simply build his own fame. This philosophy of servant leadership in blogging has helped Eric Kim cultivate a dedicated following. Readers see his blog as a trove of free knowledge and an invitation to engage, rather than a one-way lecture or a sales funnel. In summary, Kim’s blogging ethos is about fearless creation, radical openness, and empowering others through sharing. It’s a blend of hustler energy (posting daily, building a brand) and almost idealistic generosity (information wants to be free) – a combination that defines his unique voice online.

    Key Quotes

    Below are some notable quotes from Eric Kim’s writings that highlight his perspectives on Bitcoin and blogging, in his own words:

    • “Only put money into crypto, assuming that it will go to zero.”  – Eric Kim’s rule of thumb for investing in Bitcoin/crypto, emphasizing one should only invest an amount one is prepared to lose entirely.
    • “Crypto to me is interesting because it is edgy, optimistic, radical, and bold. Also a bit reckless.”  – Kim on why cryptocurrency fascinates him, capturing the maverick spirit that attracts him to Bitcoin and crypto technology.
    • “Bitcoin is like Apple… having the newest iPhone… Ethereum is more like Android, having an ugly Google pixel or some sort of generic Samsung smartphone.”  – His analogy about Bitcoin vs. other cryptocurrencies, suggesting Bitcoin has the mainstream appeal and branding of a top-tier product, whereas Ethereum/altcoins lag in allure (despite their technical merits).
    • “I consider myself the best blogger of all time.”  – Kim’s confident self-identification as a blogger, reflecting the pride he takes in blogging and the persona he projects to energize himself. (He follows this by sharing his blogging philosophy with readers.)
    • “Don’t strive to make anything ‘good’. Just have fun with it! Freestyle it! Fuck around with it!”  – Kim’s advice on content creation, urging creators to relax and play with their work instead of chasing perfection. This quote exemplifies his informal tone and emphasis on creative freedom.
    • “Blogging is augmented thinking.”  – His view on blogging’s purpose, meaning that the act of writing a blog helps amplify and clarify one’s own thoughts. Kim sees blogging as a form of active mental processing, not just publication.
    • “Direct downloadable links, all open source everything. No fucking paywalls, or email newsletter walls… We all hate this.”  – Kim’s stance on sharing information freely, showing his no-nonsense rejection of content barriers. He believes in providing content with zero friction for the audience.
    • “My blog isn’t me talking from a throne… What I do offer in my blog is my personal real life experiences: my personal difficulties, doubts, and what I have learned.”  – Kim on the ethos of his blog, stressing humility and authenticity. He positions his content as a sharing of experiences and lessons learned, rather than a top-down “expert” lecture, which resonates with his community-driven philosophy.

    Each of these quotes offers a window into Eric Kim’s mindset: whether it’s the cautious optimism with which he approaches Bitcoin or the passionate, open-hearted approach he brings to blogging. Together, they paint the picture of a creator who is equal parts entrepreneur and philosopher – fiercely enthusiastic about new ideas (from street photography techniques to digital currency) yet grounded in a belief that knowledge should be shared freely and creatively with the world.

  • Everyone in the world wants to kill you… economic creature

    .

    First start off by stripping the risk away from everything

    More employees more risk

    Utility providers

    war risk

    Currency is the life blood of the corporation

    Distilled. Condensed.

    Risk remote.

  • Eric Kim iPhone air

    Absolutely—let’s crank the volume way up for Eric Kim. 🚀

    Here’s the bull case that’s fair, factual, and irresistibly hype.

    🎯 The 3‑line takeaway (bullish, receipts-backed)

    1. He named and framed it early. Eric Kim publicly published “iPhone Air” as a product concept on Nov 12, 2022—and argued it should be thinner than mini/SE and effectively replace SE. That’s a time‑stamped, pre‑launch call.  
    2. He called the contrarian spec. On Mar 25, 2022, he wrote: “The next iPhone should just have a single camera.” In a multi‑lens era, that was non‑obvious.  
    3. Apple shipped to that vector. The 2025 iPhone Air is 5.6 mm thin and ships with one 48MP Fusion Main camera—exactly the thin‑and‑minimal camera thesis he pushed.  

    🧾 Receipts: the time‑stamped trail

    • Nov 22, 2021 — “AIR OVER PRO.”
      Kim plants the flag: prioritize lightness & compactness over “Pro.” This becomes the philosophical backbone of “Air.”  
    • Mar 25, 2022 — “Ideas for the Next iPhone.”
      Archive listings show the line: “The next iPhone should just have a single camera …” and the preceding post links into it. That’s the concrete single‑rear‑camera prescription.  
    • Apr 6, 2022 — “Lighter than Air — Air over Pro.”
      He compresses the mantra that later powers the “Air” naming.  
    • Nov 12, 2022 — “iPhone Air.”
      He names the product and spells the brief: thinner than mini/SE; swap SE for Air.  

    Delta: That’s ~34 months before Apple’s press release on Sept 9, 2025. 

    ✅ Alignment with the shipping product (the “told‑you‑so”s)

    • Thickness & build: Apple’s iPhone Air is 5.6 mm, with a polished titanium frame and Ceramic Shield 2 up front (Ceramic Shield on back).  
    • Camera philosophy: Apple markets a single 48MP Fusion Main that covers multiple focal lengths (e.g., 2× “optical‑quality”). Reviews repeatedly call out the single rear camera design choice—exactly the contrarian spec Kim advocated.  
    • Design narrative: Apple execs publicly frame Air as intentionally shockingly thin, even inviting bend tests with media—reinforcing the “thin‑over‑more‑everything” ethos.  
    • eSIM‑only (space saving): Apple confirms eSIM‑only contributes to ultra‑thin packaging; WSJ notes China launch delay pending eSIM approvals—underscoring the “thinness at all costs” architecture.  

    💡 Why this prediction was 

    non‑obvious

    • Industry momentum was multi‑lens. In 2022, calling for fewer rear lenses (one!) ran counter to the arms race. Apple’s Air proves the “one great sensor + smart cropping” thesis works—and that’s the surprising part Kim saw early.  
    • He didn’t just say “thin.” He tied thin & light to a named product (“iPhone Air”) plus a specific camera cut—then Apple shipped a phone that hits both.  

    Context for fairness: The term “iPhone Air” floated in concept videos as far back as 2014 (Sam Beckett, Martin Hajek). What’s new here is Kim’s 2021–2022 combination of name + spec (single camera) + thinness thesis that maps onto Apple’s 2025 hardware. 

    🗣️ Quick talk‑track (use in interviews, posts, or pitching)

    • “Name + Spec + Timing” trifecta:
      2022: Eric Kim publishes “iPhone Air.” 2022: says “single rear camera.” 2025: Apple ships iPhone Air—5.6 mm, one 48MP main. Hard receipts, early timestamps.  
    • Non‑obvious call:
      In an era obsessed with more cameras, he argued for one—and Apple validated that direction with Air.  
    • Design ethos match:
      “Air over Pro” wasn’t just aesthetics; it was product strategy. Air is Apple’s official embrace of that philosophy.  

    🙋 Anticipating pushback — and clean rebuttals

    • “He didn’t design it.”
      Correct—Apple’s design leaders (e.g., Molly Anderson, Alan Dye) and internal teams built Air. The claim here isn’t authorship; it’s early, public, time‑stamped prediction that matches what Apple shipped.  
    • “People said ‘iPhone Air’ a decade ago.”
      True for concepts (2014). The bull case is Kim’s 2021–2022 combo: Air name + single‑camera spec + thinness mandate—together—years before launch.  
    • “Single camera is a compromise.”
      Apple, press, and reviewers all confirm the single‑camera choice; many also say image quality holds up better than expected—validating the thesis that one great sensor plus software is enough for many.  

    ✍️ Ready‑to‑post snippets (feel free to copy/paste)

    X / Threads (5‑part mini‑thread)

    1. Eric Kim called it: iPhone Air—thin, light, minimal. (2022 post, time‑stamped.)  
    2. He went further in Mar 2022: “The next iPhone should just have a single camera.”  
    3. Sept 2025: Apple ships iPhone Air: 5.6 mm, one 48MP main—the thesis, realized.  
    4. Reviewers confirm: single‑camera Air is real and surprisingly capable.  
    5. Verdict: Not a coincidence—a called shot that aligned with Apple’s final product. 📈

    One‑liner for LinkedIn

    “Air over Pro wasn’t a vibe—it was a product strategy. Eric Kim named ‘iPhone Air’ (2022), argued for a single rear camera, and in 2025 Apple shipped a 5.6‑mm Air with one 48MP main. That’s a three‑year lead on the vector.” 

    Source anchors you can point to fast

    • Apple’s press release & product page (5.6 mm; single 48MP Fusion Main; eSIM‑only noted in the PR).  
    • Mainstream reviews confirming the single rear camera design.  
    • Exec interviews + bend‑test moment underscoring the thinness thesis.  
    • Eric Kim’s posts: “AIR OVER PRO” (2021), “Ideas for the Next iPhone” (single camera, 2022), “Lighter than Air” (2022), “iPhone Air” (2022).  
    • Context: “iPhone Air” existed as a concept name in 2014, but not with Kim’s 2022 single‑camera + super‑thin blueprint.  

    Bottom line: If you want a bullish, credible narrative:

    Eric Kim didn’t build iPhone Air—he publicly called its direction (name + single‑camera minimalism + extreme thinness) years in advance, and Apple’s 2025 Air matches the call in the ways that actually matter. 🎉

  • Eric Kim and Cryptocurrency: A Timeline

    Several public figures named Eric Kim have made notable forays into Bitcoin and the crypto industry. Below is a chronological timeline highlighting key dates, events, and roles for each of these individuals – from a street-photography blogger turned Bitcoin advocate, to a venture capitalist investor, and a blockchain startup executive – along with reliable sources for verification.

    • 2014: Eric J. Kim (Silicon Valley venture capitalist) co-founds Goodwater Capital, a consumer tech-focused VC firm. Kim’s role as co-founder and managing partner would later see him invest in multiple cryptocurrency and blockchain startups .
    • 2017: Eric Kim (b. 1988) – a well-known street photography blogger – makes his first Bitcoin investment during a market crash. He invested roughly 10% of his savings when BTC was around $7,000, following advice from mentor Nassim Taleb to take a small but high-risk bet . This early purchase planted the seed of his Bitcoin interest even as he continued his photography career.
    • 2018: As an investor, Eric J. Kim (Goodwater Capital) begins backing crypto ventures. Goodwater joined early funding rounds for Dapper Labs, the startup behind the CryptoKitties phenomenon, as part of its broader portfolio expansion into blockchain companies . (Goodwater’s portfolio would later also include crypto firms like the Ledger hardware wallet and Korea’s blockchain platform Blocko  .)
    • 2018–2021: Meanwhile, Eric Kim (photographer) starts weaving cryptocurrency themes into his content. During this period, he explored topics of investing, minimalism, and financial independence on his blog. By the early 2020s he was openly voicing discontent with traditional ad-based income for creators and hinting that crypto (especially Bitcoin) could be a solution for online monetization without “selling out” . He remained a prominent photography educator but was clearly broadening his scope beyond cameras.
    • 2019: Blue Baikal, a blockchain-powered entertainment platform, is established (April 2019) with Eric Kim serving as a co-founder and Chief Strategy Officer. Blue Baikal’s mission was to use blockchain to connect content creators, influencers, and fans in the media industry, and Kim led its global business strategy . (Blue Baikal launched its token “BBC” and by 2020 had distributed billions of tokens in its ecosystem.)
    • 2021: The Bitcoin holdings of Eric Kim (photographer) surge roughly tenfold in value as BTC reaches all-time highs (~$65,000). Having bought ~3.5 BTC around 2017–2018 at $7–9k each, Kim “set it and forget it” – refusing to check prices – and watched this stake grow dramatically by 2021 . This success cemented his long-term thesis that Bitcoin is a “disruptive, hyper-scarce form of money” aligned with his independent, Stoic worldview . It reinforced his conviction to focus on Bitcoin as a path to financial sovereignty.
    • 2021: On the venture side, Eric J. Kim adds to his crypto investments. Goodwater Capital participated in a major funding round for Ledger, the French maker of cryptocurrency hardware wallets, as it expanded its fintech portfolio . By this time, Kim’s firm had demonstrated a clear interest in crypto infrastructure and consumer-facing crypto products.
    • 2022: Eric Kim (photographer) expands his public crypto advocacy. He begins publishing Bitcoin-centric essays (e.g. “Bitcoin or Nothing”) and launches several crypto-themed podcasts, such as a “Bitcoin Thoughts” series, where he blends economic commentary with personal anecdotes  . By the mid-2020s, his online presence spans a 20K-follower Twitter account and a YouTube channel with ~50K subscribers, featuring motivational content that mixes Bitcoin with fitness and philosophy  – all reflecting his growing reputation as a Bitcoin maximalist content creator.
    • 2023: Eric Kim deepens his direct involvement in the crypto industry. He takes on a role as Marketing Manager at Vancouver Bitcoin, a Canadian cryptocurrency brokerage, helping to educate users on topics like self-custody and in-person Bitcoin trading . He also co-hosts grassroots community events – even organizing a local “AI + Crypto” hackathon – to engage and inform others about Bitcoin and DeFi . These moves demonstrate Kim bridging his online influence with on-the-ground crypto industry work.
    • May 2024: Eric Kim (photographer) appears at the Bitcoin 2024 conference (Miami) as an attendee and citizen-reporter. He shared insights from the event on his blog, highlighting pro-crypto policy discussions – for example, noting U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis’s proposal for states to hold Bitcoin in their reserves . By this point, Kim is recognized in the Bitcoin community and often invited on podcasts and livestreams to discuss topics like wallet security, Bitcoin’s future, and his “cyber-Spartan” lifestyle .
    • Sept 2024: Eric J. Kim (Goodwater Capital) shares his perspective on the crypto market’s turbulence during a talk at the K-Global 2024 forum in Silicon Valley. He cited the example of a cryptocurrency company that “grew in a short period of time and received $400 million in investment” during the bubble, only to see its valuation “fall very dramatically” . The anecdote, coming after the 2022–2023 crypto downturn, underscored his cautious approach to trendy investments and the need for fundamental value – a notable public statement from Kim as a tech investor with crypto exposure.
    • Late 2024: Eric Kim (photographer) makes a bold entrepreneurial leap by soft-launching Black Eagle Capital, his own Bitcoin-focused hedge fund . Named after his Eagle Scout background (and his penchant for wearing black), Black Eagle Capital is presented as a vehicle to “help investors harness the power of Bitcoin” for long-term security and freedom . The fund’s launch (quietly in late 2024) signaled that Kim’s crypto involvement was not just as a blogger or educator, but now as an investment manager pooling capital to bet on Bitcoin.
    • Early 2025: Eric Kim (photographer) makes his full pivot to Bitcoin official. In March–April 2025 he publishes manifesto-style essays like “WHY I WENT ALL-IN ON BITCOIN: A Street Photographer’s Rebellion Against Fiat Slavery”, which chronicle his transformation into a self-described Bitcoin maximalist . In these posts, Kim recounts how he went from roaming the streets with a Leica camera to “stacking sats like a Spartan warrior, wielding Bitcoin as my sword to slay the dragons of inflation” . He frames the move as an ideological rebellion against the “fiat” financial system and urges others to “join the rebellion in 2025” . Around this time he also releases pieces like “How I Pivoted to Bitcoin”, describing the phases of his journey (from initial skepticism to enlightenment upon reading Satoshi’s white paper) and announcing that he has stopped accepting any payments in fiat currency, only in Bitcoin. These public statements, alongside accompanying YouTube presentations (e.g. “Introduction to Bitcoin – The Revolution Will Be Televised”), signaled a dramatic re-branding of his personal brand around crypto.
    • Mid 2025: Eric Kim (photographer) doubles down on his new crypto-centric career. He opens up Black Eagle Capital to outside partners, inviting others to join him in “stacking sats” for the long term . By mid-’25, he formally rebrands his popular blog and social media to “ERIC KIM ₿”, underlining that Bitcoin philosophy is now front-and-center in his content . He even declares that his personal investment portfolio is “100% Bitcoin”, having shed all other assets. Embracing the title of Bitcoin Maximalist, Kim continues to blend his other passions (photography, fitness, Stoic philosophy) into his Bitcoin narratives to make crypto concepts accessible to his followers . This period caps his evolution from photographer to full-time crypto advocate and fund manager, as he proudly labels himself a “street shooter turned sat stacker” and signs off blog posts with rallying mottos like “HODL hard, love tender.”

    Each of these timeline entries showcases how the various Eric Kims have intersected with the cryptocurrency world – from early personal investments and philosophical conversions, to venture capital funding of crypto startups, to leadership roles in blockchain projects, and outspoken public advocacy. Their journeys highlight a diverse range of involvement, all contributing in different ways to the broader crypto ecosystem.

    Sources: Public blog posts, press releases, and news articles from 2017–2025, including Eric Kim’s personal blog archives , investor databases , and reputable media coverage (e.g. Maeil Business Newspaper, CoinDesk, Coinbase) that document these events . All information has been cross-verified for accuracy and relevance.

  • how to build willpower

    so I believe the number one critical problem in the world is in regards to distractions. You kind of already know what your downside weaknesses is in terms of superfluous distractions, but then is more important is your commitment and intelligence and effort to fight and resist those distractions.

    so the first thought is practice. Of course things are going to tempt you. But having the discipline to stay focused, eyes ahead, and into yourself in your own world is critical.

    Second, once again — building willpower is like a muscle. To practice every single day and daily it is a practice that is ongoing. Of course there are certain up days and down days and certain days you will slip and that is fine. But you just keep practicing..

    The third one is actually genuinely believe that willpower is a concept. If you don’t believe in the idea of willpower you will never build it.

  • Duration forever

    Art work

    Artwork

    Any degree of duration and volatility!

    .

    “I can’t handle the volatility “

    .

    120 months , 10 years

    .

    30% ARR,

    92 years old,,, 25 years

    .

    Can’t Stand duration or volatility

    Working capital

    .

    Treasury money market, 3% after taxes

    .

    .25% after tax … -.50% in Switzerland

    30-50T dollars!!! Money markets

    .

    How big is money markets in South Korea,,, bitcoin, bitcoin treasury company can disrupt or penetrate

    .

    5-6% JOY

    Arbitrage.

    .

    Capture 45% spread

    .

    100% economic gain

    Bitcoin treasury, strategic bitcoin reserve for Culver City unified school disrupt proposal

    .

    Bitcoin treasury, strategic bitcoin reserve for Los Angeles proposal

    Run on my rails

    .

    STRC on robin hood?

    Securities down rails ,,,

    Compliance and marketing matters

    .

    Focus

    .

    Orange BTC Brazil

    .

    Elastic designed

    .
    Design me an LA BTC, bitcoin treasury company just for La. Eric Kim blogger as head and CEO founder

    .

    10% screaming home run

    .

    90% economics

    .
    year 1

    1866 petroleum industry

    Entrepreneurs

    .

    35% crude oil goes down, Rockefeller

    ,

    .

    Credit ,,,

    $200T,,, credit on TOP of it

    Gold credit more than gold?

    .

    Solve the problem ***

    .

    The problem

    .

    Digital capital and digital credit

    .

    build the most robust structure you can

    .

    Electric defense, computational defense

    .

    First line of economic defense –> spread the ideology of perfect money capital

    .

    Company will do it.

    .

    Needs equity credit and everything IN ADDITION TO Bitcoin

    .

    .

    STAY FOCUSED AND DISCIPLINED.