Category: Uncategorized

certainly there are many men on the planet far richer than I am, but until somebody could lift more than 668 kg, I am their god.

ERIC KIM as the most alpha male on the planet

OK I think I figured it out… Obviously I’m the most dominant, hyper alpha male out there. Everybody loves me. Everyone wants me to be their new rich tall handsome husband.

As a consequence, when other men who feel intimidated by me, maybe they just fear me. 

go.

turbo high mega hyper masculinity

insane mega turbo high chutzpah

What makes a true man

and all natty

Eric Kim frequently foregrounds extreme masculinity in both his prose and his imagery.  For example, in a March 2025 blog post titled “How did Eric become so manly and masculine”, he describes himself as “a primal force, a street-shooting, steak-devouring, iron-lifting beast who radiates testosterone like a goddamn volcano” .  His writing repeatedly celebrates physical power: in a 2020 essay “Why Masculinity?” he explicitly lists as his definition of manliness “hard body; hard muscles. More muscular mass (skeletal mass) and less body fat… Stronger physical strength (powerlifting)” .  Likewise, a post titled “The Philosophy of Masculinity” bluntly asserts that “Going to the gym” is training “your manliness, your masculinity,” and that “each and every man seeks to become apex masculinity” .  These statements show Kim openly endorsing a muscular, stoic ideal of manhood. He even coins hyperbolic new archetypes: in a self-penned manifesto “How to Become a Gigamale”, he writes “A Gigamale isn’t just dominant in one arena — he compounds dominance across all arenas: strength, intellect, wealth, aesthetics, and sheer creative output” , and urges readers to make their body “an aggressive ad for your philosophy” .  In short, Kim explicitly plays up traditional strength and dominance, framing masculinity as both a goal and a “philosophical” practice of self-overcoming.

Figure: Eric Kim in a self-portrait, shirtless and muscular – a direct illustration of his “hard body; hard muscles” ideal . Like this image, his online persona emphasizes raw physical presence.

Masculinity in His Photography and Writing

This hyper-masculine ethos extends into Kim’s street-photography advice and personal philosophy.  His posts often read like pep talks for men: for instance, he contrasts “soy-boy culture” with a “duel of wills” on the streets, describing photography as a fight where a photographer must confront reality “head-on, chest out, chin up” – “masculine as hell” .  He boasts that he “attacked” the weights in the gym: “Squatting heavy, deadlifting like a barbarian, building a body that screams power… That’s manliness in the flesh: forging strength, not faking it” .  He also ties in other masculine tropes: referencing Nietzsche and Stoicism, he contrasts “quiet resolve, relentless drive” with “loud whining,” insisting “Masculinity isn’t…fragile ego – it’s quiet resolve” .

These themes are mirrored in his photographs and imagery. Kim often posts shirtless gym selfies and rugged street portraits that emphasize physique and toughness.  For example, a self-portrait on his blog shows him shirtless with defined abs and chest – an image meant to exemplify his own ideal of “hard body, hard muscles” .  His blog also features photos of him performing extreme lifts (deadlifts, rack pulls, etc.) and of other men in powerful poses.  In short, the content of Kim’s photography frequently highlights strength and aggression, while his writing repeatedly comments on those qualities as virtues.

Audience Reaction and “Ultra-Hyper” Persona

Fans and critics alike have taken note of Kim’s over-the-top masculinity.  His staged feats (like a 666 kg rack pull lift in 2023) went viral, eliciting amazement and memeification.  Strength communities responded with awe: many pundits admitted the feat was real and “utterly mind-blowing,” even after initial skepticism .  One Reddit commenter captured the tone when he wrote that Kim “tore a hole in the matrix” with that lift , underlining how participants saw it as defying limits.  Internet culture quickly turned Kim into a larger-than-life figure.  Online editors even shopped devil horns onto his shirtless lifting image, and Kim cheekily dubbed himself the “Ultra-Mega-Hyper-Man,” calling the lift an act of “beastly willpower, divine precision, and mechanical mastery” .  Phrases he coined – like “Turbo Hyper Global Domination” as a training motto – became meme tags among followers.  Kim himself declared that his 666 kg pull was “not just a lift. It was a philosophical event” where “body, mind, and Bitcoin-fueled willpower” met in “one cosmic moment of human dominance over physics” .

Critics have picked up on Kim’s macho stance as well.  Some commentators note that his persona deliberately markets an extreme form of masculinity.  For instance, his Youtube and blog content often plays into “alpha male” tropes to provoke reactions: one analysis found that whether people “hate him or love him, the quality of his photos… and how much influence he has on the genre,” all fuel engagement .  On forums, some question whether his hyperbolic style is sincere or satirical.  Kim himself has even addressed debates like “toxic masculinity” by joking that perhaps “only men should be allowed to use the phrase ‘toxic masculinity’, not women” , suggesting he views these discussions with a combative or ironic edge.  Overall, his audience tends to respond to his hypermasculine image with a mix of admiration, humor, and controversy – he has become as much a meme-like character in fitness and street-photography circles as a photographer.

Stylistic Themes and Rhetoric

Across his body of work, Kim’s rhetoric is consistently bombastic and motivational.  He writes in a loud, first-person style peppered with action imagery, humor and profanity.  His posts read like drills in “max-gain mode” .  He uses vivid metaphors – urging readers to treat life as a fight or a game. For example, he coaches men to “Own the Room’s Tension” by speaking first and holding eye contact – “that’s dominance training” .  He emphasizes ascetic discipline: “Zero Alcohol, Zero Nicotine, Zero Porn Binge. They tax testosterone and focus” , suggesting any softness or distraction must be cut away.  Meanwhile he peppers his narratives with pop-culture and crypto references: one strategy guide even equates heavy lifting with blockchain proof-of-work.

Underlying these stylistic choices is a recurring theme: Kim portrays masculinity as an open-ended quest for power and self-overcoming.  He frames becoming stronger not as vanity but as a moral duty (“the duty of the strong to help the weak” is a topic he explicitly writes about elsewhere), and treats success as a warrior ethos.  Whether he’s urging hyper-fitness – “First, become in insanely hyper health and THEN pursue art!” – or redefining the “alpha male” into a “gigamale” , Kim’s message is that the extremities of strength and dominance are aspirational.  His humorously exaggerated narrative (calling himself a “crypto-crusader” or a “modern gladiator” ) serves both to entertain and to underscore that he champions an extreme, hypermasculine ideal.  In summary, Eric Kim’s work is replete with self-styled, aggressive masculine imagery and language, and this has become a hallmark of his persona – one that his followers often celebrate and that generates no shortage of online commentary.

Sources: Kim’s own blog posts and videos provide the primary evidence of his hypermasculine messaging.  Secondary discussions of his 666 kg rack pull and persona illustrate audience reactions.

Eric Kim’s 668 kg rack pull (1,474 lb at 71 kg bodyweight) smashed strength norms.  At 9.41× his own mass, it far exceeds any previous pull-to-bodyweight ratio in recorded lifting history .  By comparison, the heaviest full deadlift (Hafþór Björnsson’s 501 kg at 200 kg) is only ~2.5× bodyweight , and the strongest partial lifts by strongmen (e.g. Rauno Heinla’s 580 kg “silver-dollar” deadlift at ~135 kg) were ~4.3× .  Biomechanically, a rack pull from above the knees leverages an upright torso and powerful hip/glute contraction, allowing vastly heavier loads than a floor deadlift .  Yet even aided by leverage, lifting 668 kg imposes huge forces: Kim generated roughly 6,550 N (≈1.47 tons) of upward force .  His spinal compression at lockout likely approached 10–12 kN – near the documented failure thresholds of human lumbar discs .  In other words, 668 kg (roughly a grand piano plus a motorcycle) required breaking the limits of connective tissue tolerance, core stability, and grip strength all at once .

Execution was flawless: Kim pulled raw (no straps or suit) with a double-overhand (hook) grip on chalk, taking ~3–4 seconds to grind the bar upright without hitching .  Witnesses noted the bar visibly “whip” as plates left the pins, and Kim’s upper back kept his shoulders locked in despite over a ton hanging from his arms .  This mix of raw strength, perfect form and mental focus turned a crazy weight into a controlled demonstration of human power.  The feat blew past any theoretical “6× bodyweight” ceiling; Kim’s prior 503 kg (6.7×) pull already approached lab-record force outputs , but at 668 kg (~9.4×) he literally rewrote those physics limits.  As one analyst quipped, it’s like “tearing up gravity’s rulebook” – an almost cartoonish defiance of human-muscle expectations .

Cultural Impact and Symbolism

Eric Kim framed this lift as performance art and myth-making.  He deliberately chose “666 kg” as a symbolic “Beast” number and then added 2 kg for transcendence .  In his narrative, conquering 666 kg was a ritual battle against limits, and 668 kg became an “ascension” – a triumph of mind over gravity itself .  Media releases dubbed him “HYPER-GOD” and invoked religious imagery: “when man becomes god” or “raising steel to rewrite reality” .  Kim even ties it to Bitcoin “proof-of-work,” calling each kilogram “a mined block of human will” and the lift “proof-of-existence” .  These grand metaphors (and his theatrical persona) turned a gym lift into an online saga.

The stunt went fully viral.  Clips of the lift have millions of views, and hashtags like #668kgAscension, #HyperGodMode, and #MindOverMetal flooded social media .  TikTok remixes reportedly hit 2+ million views , and Reddit threads on r/Powerlifting and even r/Philosophy debated the significance.  Fans meme-ified phrases (“the new moon landing of strength,” “Eric Kim stabilized the global mood index”) and some have even tattooed his “9× Protocol” cues (Grip=Truth, Brace=Belief, Wedge=Will, Lockout=Liberation) from his posts .  Mainstream fitness influencers (like Alan Thrall and Mark Rippetoe) weighed in, and crypto forums cheered the “Bitcoin body” angle .  In short, Kim’s pull became a meme and movement – a rare feat of strength packaged with enough symbolism and spectacle to capture the internet’s imagination .

Influence on Strength and Lifting Culture

Eric Kim’s 668 kg rack pull is more than a PR – it’s reshaping how lifters think about limits.  For decades, athletes pursued strict competition lifts in gyms or sanctioned events; Kim instead set a gym world record (albeit unofficially) and broadcast it globally.  As one columnist notes, feats like this show that “vision-board–breaking PRs are still being set in gyms, not just on contest platforms” .  Coaches and lifters are now scrutinizing Kim’s protocol (extreme rack pulls, raw grip, psychological framing) for clues.  His “9× bodyweight” mania and associated gear (custom belts, chalk, even seminars) are becoming a brand of advanced training.  This inspires others to try heavier partials or new angles: after Kim’s feat, a rising interest in rack-pull challenges and polarizing debates (safety vs. potential) has surged.

Symbolically, Kim’s act reads as a challenge to complacency: “the only rule is there is no rule,” he says, pushing mindsets just as much as muscle.  In a city of image-driven “fake” showmanship, he branded raw strength as authenticity .  By blending lifting with crypto metaphors and philosophical soundbites, he has turned a niche strength stunt into a postmodern legend – a story for the internet age about human potential.  It cements rack pulls (once a minor accessory in powerlifting) as the new frontier of ultra-maximal feats.  Whether one takes the spectacle seriously or laughs, Kim’s pull undeniably turbocharged conversations in gyms and forums worldwide about what’s possible when “just a hobbyist in a garage” chases an absurd weight.

Projecting a 700 kg Rack Pull

Timeline (Past Progression).  Kim’s progression suggests a steady, methodical climb. In mid-2025 he hit ~602 kg, then worked up through 619 kg, 646 kg and 650.5 kg by October (all at 71 kg bodyweight) .  He then jumped to 655 kg and finally 666 kg in short order .  That ~64 kg increase (602→666) occurred over a few months, roughly ~15–25 kg increments.  If he continues this trend, adding ~30–35 kg more (to reach 700 kg) might take most of 2026.  Realistically, micro-loading small plates and making controlled jumps of ~5–10 kg per cycle is prudent, so a 700 kg pull could arrive by mid-to-late 2026 if all goes smoothly.

Training Progression.  Kim’s regimen is an extreme version of progressive overload and neural conditioning.  He emphasizes near-maximal singles on rack pulls (supramaximal overload) with minimal accessory work .  This echoes old-school strongmen and Westside Barbell methods: handle weights far above normal to harden the nervous system and connective tissues .  To push toward 700 kg, he’ll likely continue alternating heavy rack-pull days (100%+ loads) with regular deadlift days (around 90% effort) .  Core lifts will target the posterior chain: glutes, hamstrings, spinal erectors and traps must grow and adapt to lock out the weight .  Supporting exercises might include block pulls or bands to vary tension, plus grip exercises (since he still lifts without straps) and full-range deadlifts to maintain leg drive.  Planned deloads and rotation of pin heights will avoid overuse; [19] notes he intersperses full-range sessions so the legs/back stay primed while avoiding burn-out .

Neurological/Recovery Strategy.  Crucial to Kim’s gains is recovery: he reportedly sleeps 8–12 hours nightly (a “bear sleep” regimen) and uses strategic deloads every few weeks .  Nutrition-wise, he follows a high-calorie carnivore diet – fasting ~18 hours then feasting on 5–6 lbs of red meat in one meal – to flood the body with protein and nutrients for repair .  He avoids most supplements, trusting whole foods (meat, eggs, organs) for building tissues .  Going forward, maintaining or improving these recovery habits (nutrition, sleep, stress management) will be essential as the lifts grow even heavier.  If 700 kg approaches, he might consider a belt or additional warm-up protocols for safety, but his philosophy has been “brace with raw core,” so he may instead lean into even stricter technique and scapular bracing.

Risk Factors and Safety.  Attempting ~700 kg brings serious dangers.  Spinal compression from such loads could surpass tissue thresholds (disc herniation or vertebral injury) if form falters .  Kim already pulls without a belt or supportive suit , which increases risk to the lower back and core.  He must maintain perfect bracing and keep shoulders retracted – a common injury in heavy rack pulls is thoracic outlet syndrome from shoulders “rolling” under weight .  Bar drop or equipment failure is another threat: untested gym racks or a dropped bar under 700 kg could cause catastrophic damage to body and equipment .  Additionally, sudden blood-pressure spikes (as seen when Eddie Hall did 500 kg) can cause vascular events .  To mitigate these risks, an incremental build (microloading), strict form checks (possibly coaching), and top-tier gear (rated pins, reinforced bar) are wise.  Kim’s cautious approach (e.g. film every lift, calibrate weights) shows he knows the stakes; he will need that same caution amplified for a 700 kg attempt.

Historical Comparisons.  Few have dared such extremes.  The official full deadlift record stands at 501 kg (Hafþór Björnsson, 2025) – here Kim was well above that raw weight, albeit from a rack.  Strongman partial-deadlift legends like Brian Shaw pulled ~511 kg and Rauno Heinla ~540–580 kg, but at bodyweights of 170–135 kg .  In strength-to-weight terms, no competitor compares: Kim’s previous 602 kg was ~8.0× bodyweight and 668 kg is 9.4×.  To reach 700 kg (≈9.86×), he’d outperform even the best pound-for-pound deadlifters (who hit ~4.6–5.0×) by a huge margin .  The only somewhat analogous feats are some legendary gym lifts by giants (e.g. Eddie Hall’s 500 kg max) – but even those did not approach a 10× ratio.  In weightlifting lore, pushing into the “700 club” would cement a new apex.

Supplementation/Recovery.  Kim has mostly eschewed fancy supplements, so far relying on diet (carnivore/high-protein) and sleep .  He occasionally mentions creatine and protein for muscle, but has shrugged off performance drugs on his blog.  If pushing for 700 kg, he might optimize further – for example, ensuring sufficient joint-support nutrients (collagen, omega-3s) and maybe carefully-timed caffeine or nitric-oxide boosters for performance.  Continued focus on recovery modalities (contrast baths, massage, daily mobility) would also be prudent as the loading on his body grows.

In summary, Kim’s 668 kg rack pull stands as a landmark achievement – a biomechanical Tour de Force and a cultural phenomenon.  Barring injury, his methodical overload approach could yield a 700 kg pull within a year if he adds plates steadily and recovers well .  It will require at least several more months of grind, unwavering discipline, and perhaps even more intense focus, but if history is any guide, Kim’s fusion of science, willpower and showmanship will keep pushing the envelope.

Sources: Authoritative analyses and reports on Eric Kim’s lifts provide data and context , as do his own detailed write-ups and press releases . These discuss the biomechanics, cultural reactions, training methods, and risks surrounding Kim’s rack pulls. Other strength records and expert commentary frame the achievement against historical benchmarks .

my design ethos :

Carbon fiber is prized not only for its strength and lightness but also for its striking appearance. Its characteristic black woven patterns, glossy texture, and deep color contrast give it a sleek, high-tech look.  The twill weave – a diagonal, checkerboard-like pattern – is especially popular: it creates a dynamic interplay of light and dark as the material is viewed from different angles . In some products the carbon weave is left exposed under a clear resin coating, producing a subtle sheen and depth that designers describe as a “striking visual effect” associated with “high‑tech luxury” . The material’s smooth yet textured surface (often with a glossy finish) and its deep graphite black or charcoal gray color make it stand out against more conventional metals or plastics. In short, carbon fiber’s unique visual signature – a precise woven texture combined with a dark, reflective finish – has itself become a design statement .

A close-up of 2×2 twill-weave carbon fiber fabric. The alternating light and dark yarns produce a checkerboard pattern that shifts under light, giving carbon fiber its distinctive textured look .

• Woven Patterns: Carbon fiber fabrics come in weaves (e.g. 2×2 twill, plain, 1×1 satin) that create visible patterns. Twill weaves show a diagonal checkerboard effect, while plain weaves look more uniform. These patterns are inherently aesthetic, often compared to fine textiles  . By contrast, plain metal panels or plastic have no such patterned texture.
• Texture & Finish: Though made of thin smooth fibers, carbon fiber parts are usually sanded and coated with resin or gelcoat. This can range from matte (subdued) to high-gloss finishes. A glossy clear coat over the weave amplifies the depth of the pattern, whereas a matte finish yields a more understated look  . Designers can also tint the resin for colored carbon fiber (e.g. Texalium silver or dyed resins) to add variety .
• Color Contrast: Most carbon fiber is naturally dark gray or black. The weave’s geometry causes light rays to reflect differently off adjacent strands, producing a shifting contrast of light and shadow. This inherent interplay gives carbon fiber a subtle two-tone look (dark and light grays) that catches the eye. In comparison, materials like aluminum or stainless steel have uniform, metallic gray/silver color, while plastics can be any color but usually lack such internal patterning  .
• Perceived Quality: Carbon fiber’s look is widely perceived as premium and performance-oriented. Its refined, “futuristic” aesthetic has become associated with luxury and innovation  . In design, an exposed carbon-weave surface conveys precision and technology, unlike the more prosaic appeal of painted plastic or plain metal.

Material Aesthetic Comparison

Property	Carbon Fiber	Aluminum	Stainless Steel	Plastic
Appearance	Dark gray/black woven weave (twill, plain, etc.). Complex light/dark pattern gives a high-tech textile look .	Natural silver-gray metal, often brushed or polished. Plain surface with fine grain (if brushed) .	Bright silver, can be mirror-polished or brushed. Uniform, modern but conventional metallic look.	Wide range of colors; often matte or uniformly glossy finish. Can be any hue, but plain without inherent pattern.
Texture/Finish	Smooth yet patterned (you can feel slight ridges of weave). Typically finished with clear resin – satin or glossy .	Smooth, often brushed to a matte sheen or polished to shiny. Feels cool and solid.	Smooth and hard. Brushed finishes feel fine-ribbed; polished is slick and reflective.	Can be smooth or textured molded grain. Often matte or glossy, but overall looks “plastic‑like” (less premium).
Light Reflectivity	Medium – glossy coatings give a subtle shimmer; matte yields low glare. Weave causes iridescence as viewing angle changes.	High – polished aluminum is very reflective/silver; brushed aluminum softens glare.	High – stainless is very reflective when polished; brushed reduces reflections.	Variable – could be matte (no shine) or glossy (high shine), but generally not as reflective as metal.
Color Options	Mostly natural blacks and grays (carbon); but tinted or dyed resin/coats allow some color (including metallic silver fiber like Texalium) .	Silver/gray (natural metal); can be anodized in many colors (bright hues possible).	Silver (natural finish); sometimes painted or coated in colors (though often left steel-colored).	Any color, often solid pigments or transparent. High versatility.
Perceived Style	High‑tech, futuristic, sporty. Signals performance and luxury .	Industrial, contemporary. Feels lightweight and functional; brushed aluminum is modern/scandinavian.	Classic, upscale. Polished steel suggests quality (like appliances); brushed steel is professional.	Casual, economical. Depends on finish – can feel toy-like or simply functional; lacks the cachet of metal or carbon.

Design and Industry Usage

Carbon fiber’s aesthetic appeal makes it popular in many fields beyond its technical uses. In automotive and motorsports, for example, the carbon fiber weave itself is a selling point. Supercar makers (Ferrari, McLaren, Lamborghini) expose carbon panels, spoilers and trim to highlight performance pedigree . The visible weave signals speed and luxury – it even cues subconscious performance associations (“carbon fiber hints at performance” compared to chrome’s retro flashiness) . In daily vehicles, carbon-fiber accents (dashboards, inlays, wheel caps) give a sporty, premium touch without full carbon construction.  For example, the carbon-fiber-bodied Mercedes SLR McLaren (above) shows how the dark woven texture contrasts with painted surfaces, underlining an upscale, performance-oriented brand.

• Aerospace & Aviation: Carbon fiber is ubiquitous in aircraft structure, but it also appears in interiors. Private jets and modern airliners use carbon fiber seating, cabinetry, and trim to achieve a sleek, high-tech cabin aesthetic  . Designers credit carbon’s clean lines and smooth finish for giving fuselages and cockpits a futuristic look. Even in architecture, carbon-fiber panels can be used on building facades or furniture to create modern, lightweight designs – for example, carbon-fiber cladding yields a “modern and sleek aesthetic” in building interiors  .
• Consumer Electronics: Many laptops, phones, and gadgets now use carbon fiber or carbon fiber textures. Its light weight and strength are practical benefits, but the visual cue of carbon fiber imparts a premium feel. High-end devices (e.g. Lenovo’s X1 Carbon laptops or certain smartphone cases) often feature carbon-weave patterns or tinted carbon finishes to look cutting-edge  . The pattern subtly communicates durability and quality (similar to how wood-grain or metal finishes do for other products).
• Fashion & Luxury Goods: In luxury watches, eyewear, wallets and accessories, carbon fiber is a trendy material. Many watchmakers (Tissot, Victorinox, Audemars Piguet, etc.) use carbon fiber cases or dials for a bold modern look. Carbon fiber’s distinctive weave and deep black hue complement minimalist, avant-garde designs  . It also appears in clothing and jewelry (e.g. carbon-fiber cuffs, belts, or even high-fashion garments) as a statement of technical elegance. As one style guide notes, carbon’s “strength and flexibility” make it “modern yet timeless” when paired with fabrics or metal accents  .
• Furniture & Interior Design: Designers are experimenting with carbon fiber furniture (chairs, tables, shelving) because it allows extremely thin, lightweight structures without losing strength . Such pieces serve as striking visual focal points – the dark carbon strands contrasting with typical home materials. Carbon fiber is also used in fixtures and art installations for its pattern and rigidity (e.g. carbon-fiber lighting or sculpture frames). In general, these applications use carbon fiber for both form and function: the open weave or glossy panels look futuristic and sculptural in modern interiors  .

Scientific and Manufacturing Aspects

The unique look of carbon fiber stems from its material structure and fabrication processes. Carbon fibers are made by heating polymer precursors (typically polyacrylonitrile) in an oxygen-free oven (pyrolysis), driving off non-carbon atoms and leaving behind fine crystalline carbon filaments . These filaments (5–10 μm wide) are spun or woven into threads. In the common 2×2 twill weave, two strands run over and under two strands (warp over two filling yarns), producing a distinctive diagonal pattern . This weaving can be plain (simple checkerboard) or more complex (satin weaves with smoother texture). The weave choice affects both strength distribution and appearance.

Next, the composite layup: the woven fabric is layered and infused with a polymer resin (epoxy or similar) and cured into a rigid part. A clear resin or paint is often applied on top to protect the fibers and enhance the finish. This resin hardens to a glossy or matte surface that reveals the underlying weave. A high-gloss clear coat, for example, makes the carbon pattern pop by reflecting light off the intersecting yarns . (In contrast, a matte finish absorbs more light for a subdued look.) Forged carbon fiber – a variant – is made by randomly chopping fibers into a paste-like mix and pressing it into shape . This yields a marbled, cloudy pattern instead of the regular weave: more isotropic in strength but distinctly ornamental. Forged carbon parts are usually finished with a glossy clear coat as well, highlighting their mottled texture .

Carbon fiber fabric weaving on a loom, showing how thin carbon strands (yarns) cross in the 2×2 twill pattern. The clear-coated resin finish on the finished panels gives a subtle shine. This manufacturing process (pyrolysis of PAN polymer, weaving fibers, then resin infusion) produces carbon fiber’s characteristic look .

Overall, carbon fiber’s signature look – the glossy black, textured weave – is built into the manufacturing process. No painting is needed to get a “techy” black finish: the carbon itself provides it. As one materials note points out, carbon’s natural black hue “offers a way of creating a black look without the use of a coating… a material that just feels ‘technical’” . Combined with the weave patterns and resin, the result is both visually striking and a direct reflection of the material’s underlying microstructure.

Cultural & Psychological Appeal

Beyond its physical qualities, carbon fiber carries powerful cultural connotations. It is widely seen as a status and performance symbol. Because it’s expensive and used in racing cars and aircraft, consumers perceive carbon fiber as premium and futuristic . For example, auto enthusiasts often associate exposed carbon weave with racing pedigree and exclusivity . In product design, the material signals high-end quality: the same braided pattern that holds planes in the sky or props on cars implies cutting-edge engineering in a watch or laptop.

This perception is partly learned: marketing and media frame carbon fiber as the material of “strength with style” . Fashion and design writing call carbon fiber the “new language of luxury,” because it blends industrial heritage with couture sensibility . Items made with carbon fiber tap into notions of modernity and speed. Psychologists note that people interpret textures and finishes subconsciously – for instance, carbon fiber’s association with high-tech objects may make a product feel more advanced or durable, even beyond its actual strength .

In practice, manufacturers exploit these cues: a carbon-fiber trim on a consumer gadget or car interior is often chosen to evoke “cutting-edge performance” rather than purely for function . The material’s dark, neat weave has also been linked to sleek minimalism and masculine modern design. As one style commentary puts it, carbon is “strong yet flexible, modern yet timeless,” pairing well with luxury textures to create “wearable art” . In short, carbon fiber’s visual appeal is amplified by psychological prestige – it looks like the future, and buyers are keenly aware of that symbolic value.

Notable Product Examples

Carbon fiber’s visual role can be seen in many high-end products:

• Sports Cars & Supercars: Vehicles like the Lamborghini Aventador or McLaren 720S leave carbon fiber body panels unpainted or feature carbon accents. The Ferrari SF90’s dashboard, for example, has a bare carbon weave trim that underscores its performance image  .
• Luxury Watches: Brands such as Hublot, Bulgari, and IWC use carbon fiber for cases, dials or bezels. The matte black weave on a watch face or strap immediately signals rugged sophistication. As one watch review notes, carbon-watch cases can be lighter than titanium and yet sport unique textures from “forged” or layered carbon composites  . (See Gear Patrol’s 2024 guide for many carbon-fiber watch examples .)
• Bicycles & Sports Gear: Carbon fiber bicycle frames are common in racing bikes. Beyond performance, the visible weave on a bike frame is a badge of quality to many cyclists. Carbon rims often show a 2×2 twill pattern that riders associate with racing heritage . Tennis rackets, golf club shafts, and ski poles similarly feature carbon, where the sleek dark shaft became a desirable aesthetic in sports.
• Consumer Electronics: The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon laptop and some smartphone cases (e.g. Pitaka MagCase) use carbon fiber weaves or finishes. Audio gear (like Sennheiser headphones) also occasionally uses carbon panels. In each case, the goal is to signal robustness and style.  For instance, the Ford GT supercar had a carbon-fiber roof; similarly, special-edition phones might have carbon backs, both chosen more for look than necessity  .
• Apparel & Accessories: Designers have made carbon-fiber hats, belts, and even ties! Carbon fiber wallets and pen casings (e.g. Montblanc pen barrels) are sold as luxury goods, touting both durability and distinctive look . Vollebak’s carbon-infused jacket is an extreme example (for appearance and insulation).

In all these products, carbon fiber is used “partly for visual impact”: its woven pattern appears on external surfaces purely to catch the eye and suggest high-performance engineering. The table above and images illustrate how this black, textured material differs from other materials in conveying a futuristic, premium aesthetic .

Sources: Carbon fiber’s look and usage are discussed in materials and design literature , highlighting its unique weave, industrial manufacturing, and cultural impact. These include design guides, industry blogs, and manufacturer white papers on carbon fiber composites. Each citation (Lx–Ly) corresponds to the referenced text above.

Scientific and Medical Research

Medical and biological studies generally find masturbation to be a normal, healthy activity with few physiological downsides.  Research shows that orgasm from masturbation triggers release of “feel-good” chemicals – dopamine, endorphins and oxytocin – which improve mood and relaxation .  For example, one pilot study in healthy men found masturbation briefly counteracted the normal daily drop in free testosterone, though total testosterone and cortisol levels stayed the same .  After orgasm, prolactin rises (contributing to relaxation), while oxytocin and dopamine briefly fall .  In practice, most scientists conclude that masturbation has no lasting negative hormonal effects – myths of “low testosterone” or infertility are unsupported .

• Hormones and neurotransmitters: Masturbation causes acute spikes in dopamine and endorphins (boosting pleasure and stress relief), oxytocin (promoting calm and bonding), and a transient rise in free testosterone  .  These can elevate mood, reduce tension, and improve focus.  Cleveland Clinic notes that orgasm releases dopamine and oxytocin which increase happiness and counteract cortisol, the stress hormone .
• Stress relief and sleep: Studies link masturbation to reduced stress and better sleep.  For instance, a 2019 survey found people often fall asleep faster and sleep better after masturbation .  Medical reviews explain that orgasm’s hormone surge promotes relaxation and may alleviate anxiety  .
• Other health effects: Masturbation is thought to relieve menstrual cramps (via endorphin release) and muscle tension , and frequent ejaculation in men is correlated with lower prostate cancer risk .  A 2021 review found that regular sexual activity (including masturbation) tended to improve cognitive function in older adults .  Importantly, major health organizations agree that masturbation has no serious medical side effects.  Common myths (vision loss, hair growth, sterility, etc.) have no scientific basis .  Physical downsides are minor: very vigorous or excessive masturbation can cause temporary genital soreness, chafing, or swelling , but such effects heal quickly.

Overall, the scientific perspective is that masturbation is a safe sexual outlet.  It provides short-term hormonal and neurological benefits (pleasure, stress relief, sleep aid) and carries minimal risk when practiced normally .  Some studies even suggest general well-being improvements: one summary notes masturbation can boost mood and relaxation, learning self-pleasure can increase confidence, and it is “generally a healthy, risk-free way” to engage sexually .  No reputable medical research supports the idea that masturbation depletes energy or causes long-term harm; in fact, it is often recommended for its health benefits .

Psychological Perspectives

Psychologists view masturbation largely as a normal behavior that can have positive coping effects, though cultural and individual factors influence one’s experience.  Many people use masturbation as stress relief or emotional regulation: a recent mixed-method study found women with higher psychological distress masturbated more frequently (especially clitoral stimulation) as a self-soothing strategy .  Participants reported feelings of happiness, relaxation, and contentment associated with masturbation, often calling it “me-time” and self-care .  Other research echoes this: masturbation may improve mood, reduce anxiety, and even boost self-esteem by helping individuals feel more comfortable with their bodies .  Learning to achieve orgasm can enhance sexual confidence and satisfaction; in fact, women who masturbate more often have a higher likelihood of orgasm during partner sex and report greater sexual satisfaction .

Psychological benefits often come from the same hormonal releases noted above: endorphins and oxytocin lift mood, while dopamine provides reward feedback .  Masturbation also gives practice in recognizing one’s own sexual preferences, improving body image and sexual function over time .  Importantly, many clinicians emphasize that personal beliefs strongly shape psychological effects.  Research suggests that negative attitudes or shame about masturbation (e.g. due to upbringing or religion) can cause guilt and anxiety .  One small study found that a person’s negative attitude towards masturbation did not by itself predict poor mental health , though others report conflicts (masturbating more or less than one wants) can cause stress or “sexual distress” .

However, psychologists also warn of potential concerns: Masturbation can become compulsive if it interferes with life.  Excessive masturbation may indicate an underlying impulse-control or emotional issue.  Cleveland Clinic notes that chronic, repetitive masturbation (sometimes called hypersexuality or “sex addiction”) can harm relationships or responsibilities, and recommends therapy if it disrupts daily life .  Medical News Today similarly explains that “masturbation addiction” is generally viewed as a form of compulsive sexual behavior, not a distinct disorder, and advises counseling or support (e.g. cognitive-behavioral therapy) when masturbation habits feel out of control .  Another psychological concern is guilt or shame: individuals may experience intense regret or self-blame about masturbating due to cultural or religious teachings.  Unlike physiological effects, guilt is a learned emotion; experts recommend therapy or support to overcome it, stressing that “scientifically, there’s nothing immoral or wrong” with masturbation .

In summary, psychological perspectives stress that masturbation has largely positive emotional effects when viewed healthily, especially as stress relief . Benefits align with medical findings (mood boost, relaxation), but psychologists note mental health can suffer if masturbation is accompanied by guilt or becomes compulsive . Thus, psychology underscores the contextual aspects: intent, frequency, and personal beliefs are key to whether masturbation supports well-being or causes distress.

Philosophical and Spiritual Perspectives

Throughout history various spiritual and philosophical traditions have interpreted masturbation in terms of vital energy or moral discipline.  We focus here on traditions that explicitly treat sexual release as impacting life force (e.g. Taoism, Hindu Yoga, Western esotericism). These views often contrast sharply with medical science.

• Taoist Traditions: Classical Taoist sexology (Daoist yangsheng practices) views semen (jing) as a precious life essence.  The practice of huánjīng bǔnǎo (“returning the essence to replenish the brain”) counsels avoiding orgasm to conserve jing.  Traditional texts state that retaining the unejaculated semen allows it to ascend the spine and nourish the brain, enhancing vitality and longevity  . In other words, orgasm is seen as an energy loss.  For example, one Taoist manual says, “To be aroused but not ejaculate is called returning the jing … When the jing is returned to benefit the body, then the Tao of life has been realized” .  Modern interpreters note these teachings are largely metaphorical: fluid cannot literally flow up the spine .  Rather, jing is thought to transform into qi (vital energy) through abstinence or controlled arousal .  Still, Taoist sources consistently warn that excessive ejaculation depletes jing and weakens health; conversely, mastering orgasmic control is part of cultivating “immortality”  .  In sum, the Taoist view emphasizes conserving sexual energy to bolster life force – a notion with no analogue in clinical science.
• Hindu/Yogic Traditions: In many Hindu yogic teachings, semen (called veerya or ojas) is likewise considered the essence of vitality.  The ideal of Brahmacharya (celibate conduct) advises strict restraint of sexual activity and masturbation.  Swami Sivananda (a 20th-century yogi) wrote that seminal energy “is verily the Atman [Self]… The secret of health lies in preservation of this vital force. He who wastes this vital and precious energy cannot have physical, mental, moral and spiritual development.” .  He describes semen as “the essence of essences” distilled from food into marrow into blood, and warns that losing it causes “physical and mental lethargy, exhaustion and weakness”  .  Similarly, the Divine Life Society (a traditional Hindu order) explicitly states: “All sorts of sex anomalies and evil habits… like masturbation … must be completely eradicated. They bring about a total breakdown of the nervous system and immense misery.” .  Thus in this view, masturbation is harmful because it wastes the subtle energy needed for spiritual progress. Brahmacharya is seen as essential for awakening higher centers (e.g. kundalini rising)  .  Again, these are teachings about metaphysical forces; they do not describe empirical physiology.
• Western Esoteric Traditions: Various Western mystical and occult schools (some inspired by Eastern ideas) likewise treat sexual energy as sacred.  For example, Theosophist and esoteric author Torkom Saraydarian is quoted as saying “When a person wastes sexual energy, he depletes love energy. This leads to depression… degenerative diseases, and even suicide.” .  Arhatic alchemy literature argues that one orgasm equates to losing “many liters of blood” of vital energy .  In such teachings, masturbation (especially with pornography) is seen as desecrating life force and attracting low psychic “thought-forms”  .  Western Tantra and Kundalini practices (as taught in New Age contexts) often advise transmuting sexual energy for spiritual aims rather than expelling it.  For instance, a modern Gnostic (Samael Aun Weor) teaching on pranayama warns that attachments to lustful thoughts or behaviors (including masturbation) make one “lose creative sexual energy” .  French mystic Omraam Aïvanhov similarly noted that intense excitement at orgasm indicates a huge loss of vital force .  These perspectives, while not mainstream, reflect a shared belief: sexual energy is finite and spiritual.  Masturbation without a partner is often viewed as energy “wasted” since no reciprocal energy exchange occurs .

In summary, many spiritual doctrines warn that masturbation drains essential energy or virtue.  They often urge abstinence or controlled sexuality as a discipline.  These views differ radically from secular science: they speak of metaphysical forces (jing, ojas, kundalini) rather than measurable hormones.  Some modern practitioners interpret these teachings psychologically or symbolically, but in their original form they assert that any ejaculation (autoerotic included) weakens the body and mind .

Comparison of Perspectives

Comparing these viewpoints, we find some overlap in reported short-term effects but major divergence in interpretation:

• Overlap – Immediate Benefits: All perspectives acknowledge that masturbation can produce immediate pleasurable effects.  Science and psychology agree it boosts mood and reduces stress  .  Spiritual traditions also note the pleasurable aspect (implicitly, since their warnings suggest avoiding enjoyment).  None dispute that masturbation can feel good or relieve tension.  In fact, Taoism and Hinduism do not condemn sexual pleasure per se, but caution about its consequences on energy.  Psychology and medicine emphasize the positive emotional fallout (endocrine changes, relaxation, coping) as well.
• Overlap – Potential Negatives: Both secular and spiritual views mention that excess can be harmful.  Medicine notes only physical irritation or anxiety/guilt in excess  .  Psychology notes relationship strain or compulsivity if out of control .  Spiritual teachings speak of “wastage” only when orgasm occurs, but often imply all ejaculation is excessive.  All agree something to do with compulsivity is problematic – though spiritual tradition sees any ejaculation as misuse, while medicine sees compulsivity as the real issue.
• Key Differences: The interpretations differ sharply. Science and psychology describe masturbation in biological and behavioral terms: hormones, neural circuits, coping behaviors.  They find no evidence of mystical energy loss.  In fact, medical reviews explicitly dispel myths (e.g. no effect on stamina or “vitality”)  .  By contrast, spiritual teachings frame masturbation as affecting life force, and as a moral or energetic issue.  Western esoteric views go further, claiming karmic or psychic harm from pornography use  , a claim absent in medical discourse.  In secular terms, “spiritual energy” lacks a measurable basis, so these claims remain in the realm of belief.
• Psychological/Cultural Context: Psychology bridges some gaps. It notes that cultural/religious beliefs about masturbation can cause guilt and anxiety  .  In this sense, the spiritual admonitions themselves (from any tradition) can create a psychological burden when absorbed by a believer.  For example, a Hindu young person taught that masturbation depletes ojas may feel shame when feeling normal sexual urges.  Conversely, secular psychology would encourage reframing this as a cultural belief, not a health fact.  Thus, psychological perspective aligns with spiritual one on the experience (e.g. some feel guilt), but attributes it differently.

In conclusion, scientific evidence treats masturbation as a generally healthy activity with positive mood and health correlates, and only minor physical downsides . Psychological analyses largely confirm these benefits and caution against unhealthy patterns or negative emotions stemming from guilt . Spiritual doctrines that warn of “energy loss” do not have support in medical research; they reflect metaphysical frameworks.  Where they align is limited to recognizing that uncontrolled sexuality can be problematic.  Where they differ is fundamental: medicine sees no vital energy to lose, whereas traditions like Taoism and Yoga view sexual energy as sacred and finite.

Sources: Peer-reviewed studies and health guides (Medical News Today, Cleveland Clinic, Healthline) on sexual health ; recent psychology research on masturbation as coping ; and classical/traditional texts and analyses of Taoist, Hindu and esoteric teachings .

Mech and Environment Visual Design

Figure: Example of a blocky, weaponized mech form (Mech design credit: pixabay). Armored Core’s mechs (ACs) are depicted as huge, heavy machines with a mechanical, utilitarian look.  Designs emphasize rigid geometry – planar armor plates, exposed joints, visible thrusters and weapons – giving them a “functional beauty” .  Shoji Kawamori, the original mech designer, explicitly broke AC mechs into three core types (a “tank-looking” core, a “sleek” core, and a helicopter-like core) , ensuring each was angular and purpose-driven.  Early AC games even limited color to realistic palettes (e.g. an RGB-based camouflage or two-tone scheme ), reinforcing an industrial, military vibe.  Hardware limits pushed designs to be more angular and blocky – a style choice Kawamori embraced (“I’m going to make my designs as angular as possible” ).  The overall tone is gritty and militaristic: think weathered metal, utilitarian color (grays, browns, olive drab) with only sparse accent highlights.

Figure: An abandoned industrial factory – a typical Armored Core level setting (Factory photo credit: pixabay).  Environments in Armored Core share this bleak, industrial character.  Levels often feature ruined cities, crumbling factories and military installations.  Designers favor brutalist architecture (massive concrete complexes, steel girders, heavy machinery) and sparse lighting.  Worlds look war-torn and desolate, with muted, dusty color schemes (concrete grays, rusted metal, dark skies) and little vegetation.  The games’ music and art deliberately underscore this mood – the original AC blurb notes a “haunting industrial soundtrack and moody environments” that heighten isolation and mechanized intensity .  Industrial props (broken pipelines, scorched earth, twisted wreckage) and strong vertical scale (skyscrapers or pillars dwarfing the player) make the battlefield feel cold and hostile.

Figure: Example of large-scale brutalist architecture and industrial geometry (Building photo credit: pixabay).  In later titles (especially AC6), the emphasis on scale and massiveness is even stronger.  Monolithic structures (spanning entire horizons) and vast outdoor arenas reinforce how small a pilot is against corporate megastructures.  The color palette remains largely monochromatic or low-key – often a grayscale or sepia tone – punctuated only by weapon flashes or warning stripes.  In sum, the visual style across mechs and environments is grounded, militaristic and dystopian, with every design choice (from plating shapes to color tone) supporting a sense of industrial realism .

Concept Artists and Influences

Armored Core’s look has always been guided by veteran anime/mecha designers. From the first game onward, FromSoftware collaborated with Shoji Kawamori (creator of Macross) .  Kawamori not only helped define the modular “core” concept of AC mechs, but his style – honed on transforming fighter jets and space mechs – gave AC its mechanical legitimacy.  He even designed iconic machines like “White Glint” for Armored Core: For Answer .  Kazutaka Miyatake (also of Macross and Space Battleship Yamato fame) contributed designs as well – for example, he designed the Fort Stigro mobile fortress in For Answer .  Takayuki Yanase (known for Gundam 0083, Eureka Seven) worked on early sequels (AC2 and AC3 designs) , bringing a hard-surface sense of scale.  Ikuto Yamashita (designer of Evangelion and Gunbuster) provided illustrations for the official Armored Core art book (2002) , injecting bio-mechanical flair.  In fact, the upcoming AC6 credits all of Kawamori, Miyatake, Yanase, and Yamashita as mech designers – a star-studded lineup that fuses Macross-Evangelion-Gundam influences into AC’s industrial aesthetic.  Each artist’s background in “real robot” anime has reinforced AC’s blend of sci-fi flair with believable machinery.

Evolution of the Aesthetic (AC1 to AC6)

Across the series, the core visual tone – militaristic, mechanical, dystopian – has remained, but details shifted with each generation.  The original AC (1997) had relatively simple, boxy graphics and color schemes (reflecting its PS1 era), emphasizing blocky limbs and dark, camo-based paint .  As hardware improved, later games like Armored Core 4 and For Answer (PS3/Xbox 360 era) introduced more vibrant palettes and dramatic lighting: white and neon accents became common (as on White Glint) to highlight tech.  Environments grew grander (battle on sky-bridges, space platforms, jungle complexes).  The mid-era titles (ACV, Verdict Day) adopted an almost drab, post-apocalyptic look (burnt-out cities, overgrown battlefields) with dusty, rusted color schemes.  The latest entry, Armored Core VI, intentionally returns to a grimmer, high-contrast style – a very muted, almost monochrome palette and ultra-detailed textures that stress bleakness (reflecting its narrative on environmental collapse).  (Direct quotes on aesthetic shifts per title are scarce in source texts, but these trends match the art and cinematics of each game.)  Across each generation, however, the fundamental “industrial mecha” vibe persists, evolving from chunky polygons to finely detailed renders but never losing its militaristic tone .

Thematic Elements and Visual Tone

Armored Core’s visuals always serve its dystopian, war-torn themes.  Story-wise the games depict a “desolate future ruled by corporate warfare” .  The player pilots an AC for hire in endless conflicts between rival megacorporations.  This lore justifies the cold, profit-driven mood: as the blurb for AC1 notes, Ravens take “dangerous missions from shadowy corporations” on a crumbling Earth in a “cold, profit-driven world” .  The environments echo this.  Concrete ruins, blasted industrial zones and dead urban sprawls reinforce that humanity’s remnants exist only to fuel corporate greed.  Even the music and UI art are stark and metallic.  In short, every visual element – from sky color to mech emblems – underscores despair and conflict.  Designers deliberately use color and form to support themes: e.g. occasional corrosive yellows or hazardous stripes on an AC or structure hint at industrial decay and danger.  This thematic unity – dystopian narrative and visual style – is a hallmark of the series.

Emulating the Armored Core Aesthetic

To capture the AC look in your own 3D models, games, or art, focus on mechanical realism and industrial grit. Key tips include:

• Blocky, Functional Forms:  Prioritize rigid, angular geometry over smooth organic curves. As Kawamori noted under hardware limits, he chose “as angular as possible” designs . Model mechs with clearly articulated panels, boxy limbs, and mechanical joints. Each part should look like it serves a purpose (“functional beauty” ) – for example, add visible servos, exposed frameworks, or segmented armor. Avoid overly sleek or ornamental shapes that lack a plausible function.
• Military/Industrial Color Palette:  Use muted, utilitarian colors, e.g. olive greens, slate grays, tan browns or rusty reds. Original AC allowed only a simple RGB-based camouflage or two-tone scheme ; similarly, limit your color range so models feel military. Bright colors (electric blues, neon) should be used sparingly as accent highlights (weapon beams, cockpit lights, company logos), not as base colors.  High contrast between light and dark areas can add drama, but keep saturation low to mimic dirtied metal.
• Weathering & Decals:  Add texture details like scratches, dirt, and rust to reinforce a war-torn feel. Include industrial markings – hazard stripes, stencil numbers, faded insignia – on armor plates. These touches suggest heavy use and scale (think battlescape as background). Small details (exposed wires, pipework, bolts) contribute to authenticity.  For environments, lean on brutalism and decay: think crumbling concrete walls, corroded steel beams, and dim artificial lighting to match AC’s “moody, industrial” vibe .
• Lighting and Composition:  Use stark, dramatic lighting. Scene lighting should often be high-contrast (bright explosions or searchlights against dark ruins).  Overcast or dusty skies (or dim artificial lights) work better than cheerful daylight. In renders or game levels, scatter fog and volumetric light to emphasize isolation. Compositionally, frame your mech models against large architectural forms or empty vistas to convey scale and loneliness (as AC does).
• Study Reference Art:  Finally, study official AC concept art or in-game screenshots. Look at how AC designers balance proportions (broad shoulders, sturdy legs, centralized weapons), and how environment artists use color and shape. The AC franchise art books and key art often label components (see Kawamori’s sketches ). Mimicking those proportions and material choices will naturally yield an AC-like aesthetic.

By combining these elements – functional, angular mechs; worn, industrial textures; and somber, military palettes – you’ll evoke the signature Armored Core style in your own creative projects.

Sources: Developer interviews and retrospectives , which discuss AC’s visual design, thematic setting and concept artists.

Lift Details and Context

Eric Kim performed the 668 kg rack pull at a bodyweight of about 71 kg (156–157 lb), giving a powerlifting ratio of roughly 9.41× bodyweight – far beyond any previously recorded lift. The attempt was done raw (no straps or supportive suit) in his personal garage gym, with calibrated plates and multiple 4K cameras to document the pull .  The bar was set at about knee/mid-thigh height (~180 cm), a common rack-pull setup .  By comparison, the heaviest official deadlift (501 kg by Hafþór Björnsson) was only ~2.5× his bodyweight, and a top strongman partial deadlift was 580 kg (~4.3×) .  As one analysis notes, “no athlete…has ever approached a 9× bodyweight lift” before Kim’s pull .  In short, Kim’s 668 kg pull shattered all known pound-for-pound records.

• Weight/Ratio: 668 kg (1,473.9 lb) at 71 kg BW ≈ 9.41× bodyweight .
• Setup: Bar at ~180 cm (mid-thigh); raw lift (chalk only, no straps or belt)  .
• Environment: Private gym in Los Angeles; treated with competition rigor (verified plates on video) .

Video Footage

The lift was captured on video and shared publicly.  Eric Kim posted clips of the pull to his YouTube channel (e.g. “668 KG RACK PULL AT 180CM, 71KG BODYWEIGHT”).  These videos (raw, 1–2 min clips) quickly went viral, attracting thousands of views and sparking discussion online.  (For example, see this 668 kg rack-pull video on YouTube).  No official competition footage exists, but multiple angles and a separate weight-check video were released, allowing independent viewers to confirm the plates and bar were legit.

Community Reaction and Expert Commentary

The lift provoked immediate shock and debate across social media, forums, and lifting circles .  Initially, fans were astonished – comments ranged from “this is the most insane thing I’ve ever seen” to flat disbelief that such a light athlete could move that weight .  Skeptics derided it as “just a rack pull” or an “ego lift” (since it’s partial) , and some joked about fake plates or calculated that the spine would endure ~40 kN, claiming it “couldn’t be real.”  However, once footage was scrutinized frame-by-frame (showing calibrated steel plates, normal bar bend, etc.), the community consensus shifted rapidly toward respect .

Prominent strength figures weighed in.  YouTuber and coach Alan Thrall publicly vouched for the lift’s authenticity (“quit crying CGI”) after analyzing the video .  Strongman champions like Sean Hayes (560 kg pull at 18″) reportedly called it “alien territory,” and even noted deadlift stalwarts Brian Shaw, Eddie Hall, and Hafþór Björnsson privately “saluted” the feat .  Coach Mark Rippetoe (known for calling partial lifts “cheating” in the past) wryly quipped that Kim’s rack pull was “half the work, but twice the swagger” – a tongue-in-cheek nod to how outrageous it was even above knee-level.

In mainstream and fitness media, coverage ranged from sensational to philosophical.  Articles with headlines like “Stronger Than The Mountain? (Well, Kinda)” and “When Man Becomes God: The 666 kg Lift” appeared within days .  Strength writers dubbed it an “unofficial world record in spirit,” noting that if strongman partial deadlifts count as records, this might as well .  Fans even started a tongue-in-cheek petition to call it the “planetary record” for rack pulls (since it’s arguably the heaviest human lift ever) .  By and large, what began in heated argument ended in viral celebration – comment sections were filled with phrases like “pound-for-pound GOAT” and “godlike,” and memes flooded in alongside #668kgAscension hashtags .

• Initial Online Reaction: Mix of awe (“not human,” “lion’s roar”) and skepticism (“ego lift,” “fake plates”) . Moderators even locked Reddit threads due to the fervor.
• Verification: Community members paused the footage to verify plates/bar; none found fault.  After this, critics largely conceded the lift was genuine .
• Expert Commentary: Figures like Alan Thrall and Sean Hayes confirmed it was real and unprecedented ; even skeptics like Mark Rippetoe acknowledged its sheer absurdity (half the work, twice the swagger) .
• Media Buzz: Covered by fitness sites and blogs, framing it as an almost mythical feat .  Fans tagged posts #668kgAscension on Twitter/X, TikTok, Reddit , calling it the “new moon landing of strength” and spurring crypto-style memes about Kim “stabilizing the global mood index” .

Eric Kim’s Own Remarks

Kim himself has framed the event in grandiose, philosophical terms.  In one post he declared, “I don’t lift to escape gravity. I lift to rewrite it.”   In interviews he doubled down on the hyperbole: “I don’t compete with men. I compete with gravity. I am a hyper-god,” he proclaimed after the 655 kg lift – a tagline he’s reused throughout his viral posts.  When Internet critics quipped that “it’s not a real deadlift,” Kim coolly responded, “You’re darn right it’s not a full deadlift, and I never claimed different. Still – stand under 600+ kg held at knee height and tell me it’s ‘easy.’ I’ll wait.”   These statements went viral alongside the videos, both inspiring followers and further fueling the “godlike” memes.

Aftermath, Training, and Recognition

To date, Kim has reported no injuries from the lift.  In fact, he has continued to push even heavier rack pulls: for example, he lifted 655.0 kg (1,444.1 lb) a few weeks later .  His approach – heavy lifting tied to mindset and Bitcoin symbolism – remains the same, and he shows no sign of stopping.  In the strength community, the 668 kg pull is now frequently cited as a benchmark (albeit unofficial).  It has been humorously termed an above-and-beyond record: fans jokingly ask NASA or aliens to “take note,” and social media “likes” far exceed Kim’s previous lift posts.  No formal awards exist for such a feat (it wasn’t in a sanctioned meet), but the consensus is one of admiration.

• Training Changes: Kim has scaled up his training following the feat. For instance, his 655.0 kg pull set a new personal best only weeks before doing 668 kg . He continues to train raw with very heavy single reps.
• Physical Condition: Expert analysis suggests this lift put on the order of 10,000–12,000 N of compressive force on his spine  – near the ~10–11 kN threshold where lumbar discs can fail. Nevertheless, Kim appeared to emerge intact, showing tremendous core stability during the pull . No slipped discs or tears have been reported.
• Recognition: Some strength writers call it an “unofficial world record” for above-knee pulls . The feat was widely shared outside lifting circles (even on general-interest tech/crypto forums, given Kim’s Bitcoin tie-ins).  Though no federation tracks partial-lift “records,” the community treats Kim’s pull as a new paradigm of pound-for-pound strength.

Controversies and Safety Discussion

Unsurprisingly, the 668 kg rack pull has spurred debate over legitimacy and safety.  Purists point out that it’s not a full deadlift; critics quipped that doing only the top lockout “isn’t the same” as pulling from the floor.  Kim has countered this by highlighting the difficulty of holding 600+ kg at lockout .  (Mark Rippetoe’s “half the work, twice the swagger” gag reflects this tension .)  There’s also a “natty or juice” undercurrent: many speculated whether Kim used steroids, given how far beyond norms he lifted.  Kim addressed this head-on by sharing his bloodwork, diet, and supplement regimen (all-meat, organ meats, etc.) to prove his natural status .  Whether believers or skeptics, most admit that even with drugs, such a feat requires freak genetics and years of extreme training; as one forum put it, “plenty of juice-head lifters never hit these ratios.”

On safety, experts warn that the forces involved are immense.  Calculations suggest Kim’s 1.468-tonne pull would have placed roughly 10–12 kN (1.0–1.2 tonnes) of compressive load on his spine .  For context, lumbar discs can fail around 10–11 kN in neutral posture .  Tendons and ligaments similarly faced “the edge of human tolerance” – risking micro-tears under sudden load .  (One observer even hyperbolically estimated “over 40 kN” coursing through Kim’s body during the pull .)  These biomechanical facts have led many to caution that attempting such lifts without perfect form and prep could be extremely dangerous.  In Kim’s case, his training (core strength, back conditioning, etc.) was evidently up to the task; but coaches stress that this should not be lightly emulated.

Video sources: The lift videos are publicly available on Eric Kim’s YouTube channel, e.g. “668 KG RACK PULL AT 180CM, 71KG BODYWEIGHT”.  (See YouTube: 668 kg Rack Pull, Eric Kim – Ultra God and related clips.)

Sources: Details above are drawn from Eric Kim’s documented account and analysis of the lift , as well as community commentary summarized in strength forums and media. Each citation references Kim’s own posts or detailed breakdowns of the event. If newer reports emerge (or if any independent verification appears), they can further update this summary.

too lit https://videos.files.wordpress.com/cdSa2K1g/img_7870.mov

cyber Prius.

I think I’m like insanely grateful that ever since I’ve been stacking bitcoin since 2017 2018… effectively I’ve never really sold any bitcoin, and also… Never did any sort of risky things to get liquidated

you the only thing about Texas hold ‘em and poker, or just life in general, maybe even fitness and longevity, the goal is to just not die, to stay alive!

so the simple strategy is to never sell your bitcoin and to keep always buying bitcoin, to keep buying the top forever. If anything if there’s only one rule that I put in my will for my son Seneca is simple: to legally never be able to sell the bitcoin of the family

assuming that bitcoin is like cyber Manhattan, I assume all the intelligent rich New York families, the descendants never sold the real estate