ERIC KIM ₿

I love it on the new LUMIX S9! The extra 2mm wider than 28mm,,, even more dynamic!

Eric Kim’s approach to street photography reflects both a unique economic perspective and a philosophical approach that has allowed him to sustain a living in this niche genre. Kim advocates a minimalist approach to both gear and technique, emphasizing simplicity and authenticity. This choice is not only philosophical but also practical, as he believes that excessive gear can detract from the core experience of capturing candid moments. He often encourages using affordable 35mm or 28mm lenses, which helps photographers get close to their subjects without relying on expensive equipment  .

Economically, Kim has built a career around street photography by expanding beyond just taking photos. He sustains himself through various income streams, including street photography workshops, which have gained popularity worldwide. These workshops emphasize his core principles, such as getting close to subjects and embracing the unpredictability of the street. Furthermore, his blog and educational resources, which blend practical advice with philosophical insights, have helped him establish a global following. Through his digital presence and partnerships, Kim has effectively made street photography more accessible and created a sustainable business model in an area traditionally not associated with high income  .

Kim’s integration of philosophical concepts, like stoicism and minimalism, extends into how he encourages photographers to consider the social and ethical aspects of their work. This perspective adds depth to his teachings, distinguishing him from others in the field. For Kim, street photography is not just about the image but also about the stories behind them and the broader human experience they capture. His focus on community-building and fostering a global network of photographers has also been instrumental in his success, allowing him to leverage a supportive base of like-minded individuals who share and promote his work  .

xxx

So far, ChatGPT is very unsatisfying here —

***

Street photography, a genre focused on capturing candid moments in public spaces, combines artistic expression with various economic considerations. Understanding the economics of street photography can help photographers navigate costs, monetize their work, and sustain their practice. Here’s an overview of the key economic aspects involved:

1. Initial and Ongoing Costs

• Equipment Investment:

• Cameras and Lenses: High-quality cameras and versatile lenses are essential. While entry-level setups can start around a few hundred dollars, professional gear can cost several thousand.

• Accessories: Items like tripods, camera bags, extra batteries, and memory cards add to the initial investment.

• Maintenance and Upgrades:

• Regular maintenance (cleaning, repairs) is necessary to keep equipment in optimal condition.

• Technology evolves rapidly, so periodic upgrades may be required to stay competitive.

• Software and Tools:

• Editing software (e.g., Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop) often requires a subscription.

• Backup solutions (external hard drives, cloud storage) are crucial for safeguarding work.

2. Revenue Streams

• Sales of Prints and Digital Downloads:

• Photographers can sell physical prints, canvases, or digital copies through online platforms, personal websites, or at exhibitions.

• Licensing and Royalties:

• Licensing images for use in publications, advertising, merchandise, or stock photo websites can generate ongoing income.

• Commissions and Assignments:

• Working on commissioned projects for clients, magazines, or brands can provide steady income.

• Workshops and Tutorials:

• Experienced photographers can offer workshops, online courses, or one-on-one tutoring sessions.

• Grants and Competitions:

• Applying for artistic grants or participating in photography competitions can provide financial support and recognition.

3. Market Demand and Audience

• Niche Identification:

• Understanding specific interests within street photography (e.g., urban life, cultural moments) can help target the right audience.

• Target Demographics:

• Identifying and catering to demographics interested in authentic, candid photography enhances marketability.

• Trends and Popularity:

• Staying abreast of current trends in photography and visual storytelling can influence demand and relevance.

4. Monetization Strategies

• Building an Online Presence:

• A strong online portfolio and active social media profiles can attract clients and buyers.

• E-commerce Integration:

• Setting up an online store or utilizing platforms like Etsy, SmugMug, or Shopify facilitates direct sales.

• Collaborations and Partnerships:

• Partnering with brands, galleries, or other artists can open new revenue avenues.

• Content Creation:

• Blogging, vlogging, or contributing to photography magazines can diversify income sources.

5. Economic Challenges

• Market Saturation:

• The accessibility of photography has led to a crowded market, making it challenging to stand out.

• Pricing Pressure:

• Balancing competitive pricing while ensuring fair compensation for work is crucial.

• Copyright and Legal Issues:

• Navigating rights related to photographing people in public spaces and protecting one’s own work from unauthorized use can be complex.

• Income Stability:

• Freelance street photographers may face fluctuating incomes, necessitating effective financial planning.

6. Opportunities and Growth Areas

• Digital Platforms and Social Media:

• Platforms like Instagram and Pinterest offer vast audiences and potential for viral exposure.

• Print-on-Demand Services:

• Utilizing services that print photos on various materials (clothing, home decor) expands product offerings without significant upfront costs.

• Global Reach:

• Online marketplaces allow photographers to reach international audiences, increasing sales potential.

• Technological Advancements:

• Innovations such as drones or augmented reality can offer new creative possibilities and market differentiation.

7. Financial Management Tips

• Budgeting:

• Carefully plan and monitor expenses to ensure sustainable operations.

• Diversifying Income:

• Relying on multiple revenue streams can reduce financial risk.

• Investing in Marketing:

• Allocating funds towards marketing efforts can increase visibility and sales.

• Tax Considerations:

• Understanding and complying with tax obligations related to freelance work is essential to avoid legal issues.

Conclusion

The economics of street photography involve a balance between managing costs, effectively monetizing creative work, and navigating market dynamics. By understanding these factors, street photographers can create sustainable business models that support their artistic endeavors. Success often requires a combination of artistic talent, business acumen, and adaptability to evolving market conditions.

If you have specific questions or need deeper insights into any of these areas, feel free to ask!

Street photography economics revolves around understanding the ways photographers can earn income from their work, balancing costs and revenues, and navigating the unique challenges and opportunities of this genre. Here’s a breakdown of the key economic considerations:

1. Revenue Streams

Street photographers can generate income through several channels:

• Print Sales: Selling high-quality prints is a common revenue stream. Limited editions or unique prints can command higher prices.

• Licensing and Stock Photography: Some photographers license their images for commercial or editorial use, including for websites, advertising, magazines, and other media. Stock photography sites can provide passive income, but high-quality and unique images are needed to stand out.

• Books and Zines: Many street photographers compile their work into self-published books or zines. Platforms like Blurb or Kickstarter help fund and distribute these projects.

• Exhibitions and Gallery Sales: Hosting exhibitions and selling prints through galleries can be lucrative, though it requires a reputation and relationships with gallery owners.

• Workshops and Courses: Experienced photographers often conduct workshops or create online courses on street photography techniques, editing, and storytelling.

• Freelance Assignments: While not as common as in other photography genres, street photographers sometimes get hired for assignments that involve candid, documentary-style shots in urban settings.

2. Costs and Expenses

Street photographers must consider various expenses, such as:

• Camera and Equipment: Quality cameras, lenses, and accessories are necessary, though street photographers typically prefer smaller, discreet cameras for mobility and inconspicuous shooting.

• Travel Expenses: Many photographers travel to different cities or countries to capture diverse urban environments, which can add up in costs for transportation, accommodation, and meals.

• Printing and Framing: Selling prints requires investment in quality printing, which can range from inkjet printing at home to outsourcing to a professional lab. Framing adds an additional cost if required.

• Marketing and Website: Having a strong online presence is essential, so website hosting, domain fees, and advertising or promotion costs on social media may apply.

• Exhibition Costs: Hosting an exhibition can be costly. Fees may include renting a space, marketing, framing, and catering for the opening night.

3. Market Demand and Pricing

• Pricing Strategies: Prices vary based on factors like location, reputation, and medium (e.g., print vs. digital download). Street photographers often set higher prices for limited editions and large-format prints.

• Target Audience: Buyers of street photography prints may include collectors, interior designers, and art enthusiasts, with trends often shifting based on what’s popular in interior design and art circles.

• Economic Challenges: Since street photography can often be viewed as candid and less “commissionable” work, the audience willing to pay for it can be more niche.

4. Challenges in Monetization

• Copyright and Model Releases: Street photographers must navigate the complexities of copyright and privacy laws, as images often feature people in public spaces. Commercial use usually requires model releases, which limits the usability of some images.

• Competition: The street photography market is highly saturated, and competition can make it challenging to stand out. Many photographers rely on a unique style or storytelling approach to differentiate themselves.

• Shifting Trends: Trends in photography change, and street photography is sometimes less commercial than genres like portrait or wedding photography. Economic downturns may impact art and print sales as people prioritize essential spending.

5. Leveraging Social Media and Community

• Building an Online Audience: Instagram and other social platforms are vital for showcasing street photography, building a fanbase, and driving print and workshop sales. Engaging with followers and the broader photography community can help expand reach.

• Collaborations: Collaborating with brands, other photographers, or influencers can open up new revenue opportunities. Some street photographers partner with brands for campaigns or special projects, especially if their work resonates with the brand’s identity.

6. Emerging Opportunities

• NFTs and Digital Art: With the rise of blockchain technology, some street photographers are exploring NFTs as a new way to sell and authenticate digital versions of their work. However, this market is volatile and requires an understanding of cryptocurrency.

• Crowdfunding: Platforms like Patreon, Kickstarter, or even subscription-based social media channels allow fans to support photographers directly, whether for a new book project, an upcoming exhibition, or exclusive content.

Street photography has always had a unique place in both art and documentary photography, and while the economics can be challenging, creative monetization and community engagement offer opportunities to sustain and grow a career in this genre.

During the we robot announcement from Elon Musk, possibly one of the most overlooked announcements is the whole ROBOVAN concept. In fact, I find it to be the most important and critical one;

First, it just looks plain cool! It looks like the future! This is still the bizarre thing to me; in the year 2024, why is it that none of the modern day cars look like futuristic cars, besides Tesla, cyber truck, and maybe the new Hyundai and Kia designs?

Robotaxi

OK, everyone wants the McLaren with the butterfly doors, or the Lamborghini with the scissor doors. But, for less than $30,000… You could get the same billionaire doors which will run you $250,000… For practically nothing?

Also a simple thing; when the weather is so beautiful, and the sun is shining out, and it feels so good against your skin… Isn’t the optimal strategy to like spend close to almost 100% of the day, outside in the direct sun?

assuming you have to send emails or do Zoom calls for a living whatever… Maybe the best is to just get an iPhone Pro in desert tan, and just do all your work outdoors in the direct sun, off the grid? Or iPad Pro

We new bitcoin billionaires!

I suppose, for myself, I most fascinated at the intersection of sociology and philosophy; applied practical thoughts tactics to life and everyday life.

Here are some quotes from Eric Kim that reflect his unique blend of sociology and philosophy:

1. “Sociology is practical, pragmatic, applied philosophy to society, other people, everyday life.”

Kim sees sociology as an accessible and practical tool that helps people understand societal structures and human interactions, making it useful beyond academia  .

2. “Street photography is applied sociology—with a camera. A visual sociology.”

He describes his photography as a means to explore human behavior, capturing candid moments that reveal insights about social interactions and group dynamics .

3. “In order to become more wise, you just gotta subtract, delete, or get rid of foolishness, nonsense.”

Drawing inspiration from philosophers like Karl Popper, Kim advocates for a process of “unlearning” societal conditioning, which he believes allows individuals to develop free and independent thinking .

4. “Society shouldn’t be fair. We shouldn’t expect life to be fair.”

Reflecting on social hierarchies and inequality, Kim emphasizes resilience and self-reliance, advocating for a realistic view of societal structures and expectations .

5. “Digital capitalism has made society Capitalism 2.0.”

Kim explores how digital technology and capitalism intersect, reshaping societal norms and individual behaviors in the modern age. He sees this as a new evolution in economic and social structures  .

These quotes offer a glimpse into Eric Kim’s philosophy, where he combines sociological insights with practical advice on navigating life, society, and creativity. His perspectives are detailed further on his website Eric Kim Photography and related blog articles   .

….

Eric Kim’s approach to sociology and philosophy is distinctive due to his integration of sociological insights into his street photography, as well as his emphasis on practical, independent thinking. Kim sees sociology as “applied philosophy” aimed at understanding and interacting with society. He believes that sociology helps people unlearn societal conditioning, empowering them to think freely and challenge norms. This philosophy underpins much of his work and teaching, as he encourages others to use a sociological lens to better comprehend the world around them, including economic and social structures like capitalism and digital culture.

Kim applies philosophical concepts, such as critical thinking, to deconstruct widely accepted ideas and practices. For instance, he critiques the influence of digital capitalism on society, which he refers to as “Capitalism 2.0,” and explores how technology reshapes our behaviors and perceptions. He also examines themes like fairness, suggesting that society is inherently unequal, which he feels fosters resilience and self-reliance. This pragmatic view aligns with his philosophy that individuals should focus on personal agency and reject the notion that life should always be fair.

Another unique aspect of Kim’s philosophy is his concept of “visual sociology” through street photography. He considers photography a way to document and reflect on social interactions, thereby revealing the subtle dynamics of public spaces. By capturing candid moments, he aims to explore group behaviors, body language, and non-verbal communication, providing a visual representation of social theory in action.

In combining sociology with photography and philosophy, Kim creates a framework that not only encourages deeper observation of society but also offers a way for individuals to develop critical, independent perspectives on everyday life and societal structures.

For further insights, you can explore his ideas on his website Eric Kim Photography and related blog articles on Eric Kim Philosophy.

Eric Kim’s approach to sociology is unique and compelling for several reasons:

1. Integration of Art and Social Science

Kim views street photography as a form of “applied sociology,” using his camera to observe and document social interactions in public spaces. This concept is refreshing because it extends the sociological study beyond traditional academic research, turning it into a visual exploration of society. By combining sociology with street photography, he offers an innovative way to analyze social behaviors and capture the intricacies of human interactions, which he considers a valuable sociological exercise  .

2. Focus on Challenging Norms and Encouraging Free Thinking

Kim’s philosophy emphasizes questioning societal norms and fostering independent thought, which he believes are essential for personal growth. His encouragement to “unlearn BS society has taught you” resonates with those who wish to break free from social conditioning and explore alternative perspectives. This aspect of his approach aligns with critical sociology, which often focuses on challenging dominant ideologies, but he brings it to a broader audience through his photography workshops and writings  .

3. Exploration of Digital Capitalism and Modern Society

Kim’s insights into contemporary issues, such as “Capitalism 2.0,” reflect his understanding of how digital capitalism and technology are reshaping society. He critiques consumerism and digital culture, suggesting that they influence social norms and individual behaviors in profound ways. This focus on the sociological implications of modern technology and economics adds depth to his work, connecting traditional sociological themes to current trends  .

4. Accessible and Practical Approach to Sociology

Unlike traditional sociology, which can often feel abstract or academic, Kim’s approach is pragmatic and relatable. He describes sociology as “practical, pragmatic, applied philosophy,” making it approachable for people interested in understanding the social world without necessarily engaging in formal study. By teaching street photography through a sociological lens, he empowers others to observe and analyze social dynamics themselves, fostering a form of “citizen sociology” that is hands-on and experiential .

5. Emphasis on Personal Agency and Resilience

Kim encourages individuals to accept that society isn’t always fair, promoting resilience and self-reliance in navigating life’s complexities. This perspective is grounded in sociological insights about social stratification and inequality but presented in a way that emphasizes personal empowerment. His views encourage people to navigate and adapt to social systems with an understanding of how these structures operate, blending sociology with practical life advice  .

In essence, Eric Kim’s approach is unique because it bridges sociology with the art of photography, making complex social theories accessible, engaging, and visually impactful. He offers a way to explore sociology not just as an academic field, but as a daily practice that can deepen one’s understanding of society and self.

xxx

Here are some quotes from Eric Kim that reflect his sociological theories and philosophies:

1. “Street photography is applied sociology—with a camera.”

This captures Kim’s view of street photography as a way to observe and analyze social interactions, just as a sociologist might study human behavior and societal norms  .

2. “To unlearn BS society has taught you, to learn to become a free thinker.”

Kim believes in the importance of challenging social conditioning and encourages individuals to question societal norms in order to develop independent thought  .

3. “Society shouldn’t be fair. We shouldn’t expect life to be fair.”

Reflecting his pragmatic view of society, Kim emphasizes that expecting fairness can lead to frustration. Instead, he encourages resilience and adaptation, acknowledging that social structures are often unequal  .

4. “Sociology is practical, pragmatic, applied philosophy to society, other people, everyday life.”

For Kim, sociology is a useful tool for understanding the world. He applies this perspective to his photography, which he sees as a way to explore everyday life and human connections .

5. “Capitalism 2.0—Our next evolution in society.”

Kim critiques how digital capitalism reshapes social dynamics, suggesting that technology-driven economic systems are fundamentally altering our societal structures and behaviors .

These quotes highlight how Eric Kim uses sociological insights to inform his art and provoke thought about social norms, human interaction, and contemporary societal issues. You can find more of his work and writings on his blog, Eric Kim Photography   .

..

Eric Kim’s sociological approach to street photography is based on several key ideas that blend sociological theories with visual storytelling. Although he doesn’t adhere strictly to formal sociological theories, he draws on sociological principles to inform his art and teaching:

1. Visual Sociology

Kim often describes street photography as “applied sociology” or “visual sociology.” This perspective sees photography as a means to study and reflect upon human behavior, social interactions, and the intricacies of public spaces. By capturing candid moments in urban environments, he believes he is documenting social reality, much like a sociologist might observe and analyze social dynamics. Kim’s work emphasizes body language, expressions, and nonverbal communication as visual indicators of societal norms and interactions  .

2. Challenging Societal Norms

A recurring theme in Kim’s philosophy is the importance of questioning the status quo. He encourages his students to “unlearn” societal expectations and adopt a mindset of free thinking. He views sociology as a tool for breaking down preconceived notions, enabling individuals to critically engage with the world around them. Kim often speaks about how people are conditioned by society and believes that photography can reveal these hidden structures by bringing attention to the overlooked aspects of everyday life  .

3. The Sociological Lens on Capitalism and Digital Society

Kim applies a sociological perspective to issues like capitalism, technology, and digital culture. He reflects on how digital capitalism shapes contemporary society, discussing the idea of “Capitalism 2.0,” which he sees as a transformation of economic and social structures driven by technology. His photography often critiques the consumerism and social pressures associated with capitalism, encouraging viewers to reconsider their relationship with material goods and social status  .

4. The Role of Fairness and Social Expectations

Kim frequently critiques the concept of fairness in society, suggesting that expecting life to be fair can lead to frustration and complacency. He emphasizes the importance of resilience and adaptation, viewing society as inherently competitive and often unfair. This viewpoint reflects elements of social dominance theory, where social hierarchies and inequalities are seen as natural aspects of human societies  .

5. Free Thinking and Personal Agency

Kim advocates for using sociology to foster free thinking and self-awareness. He sees sociology not just as an academic discipline but as a practical tool for personal growth and understanding. By exploring societal constructs and understanding human behavior, individuals can gain greater control over their choices and actions. This emphasis on personal agency is a cornerstone of Kim’s teaching, where he encourages his students to approach photography—and life—with an independent and inquisitive mindset  .

These perspectives highlight Kim’s unique integration of sociological thought into his art, framing his street photography as a medium for exploring and questioning societal norms. Through his work, Kim positions himself as both a documentarian and a commentator on modern social life.

…

Here are some notable quotes by Eric Kim that reflect his sociological perspective on street photography and society:

1. “Street photography is applied sociology—with a camera.”

Kim often describes his photography as a way to visually explore human behavior and societal interactions, viewing it as a sociological tool that helps to analyze and document social phenomena  .

2. “To unlearn BS society has taught you, to learn to become a free thinker.”

This quote highlights Kim’s belief in challenging societal norms and cultivating independent thought, which he sees as central to both sociology and his photography practice  .

3. “Sociology is practical, pragmatic, applied philosophy to society, other people, everyday life.”

Kim sees sociology as a foundational discipline for understanding the world, suggesting that it equips people to navigate complex social structures and human interactions .

4. “Society shouldn’t be fair. We shouldn’t expect life to be fair.”

Reflecting on societal expectations, Kim critiques the notion of fairness, emphasizing that society often does not cater to those who think independently or challenge norms .

5. “Capitalism 2.0—Our next evolution in society.”

This statement reflects Kim’s observations on how digital capitalism is reshaping societal structures, an idea he explores through his sociological lens and applies to his street photography as a form of social commentary .

These quotes illustrate how Eric Kim integrates sociology into his street photography, using his work to provoke thought and inspire a deeper understanding of society. For more about his philosophies and photography, you can explore further on his blog at erickimphotography.com   .

…

Eric Kim is a street photographer whose work is heavily influenced by his background in sociology. He studied sociology at UCLA, which shaped his approach to photography, particularly in viewing it as a form of “applied sociology” or “visual sociology.” Kim uses his camera to explore human behavior and societal dynamics in public spaces, making observations that are often sociological in nature. He believes that street photography allows for a visual documentation of everyday social interactions, capturing moments that reveal insights into social structures and norms  .

Kim emphasizes the importance of challenging societal norms and encourages free thinking through his work. He views sociology as a tool that provides a framework for understanding various aspects of life, from economics and politics to human interactions. His philosophy is evident in his approach to teaching and creating, as he often integrates sociological theories into his street photography workshops. He also sees his work as a way to resocialize people, prompting them to look at society from new perspectives  .

In addition to his visual art, Kim writes about the intersections of sociology with contemporary issues, such as digital capitalism and social dominance, and he critiques societal expectations, particularly around fairness and success. His goal is to use street photography not just as a craft, but as a method of social inquiry and commentary, blending art with the analytical lens of sociology .

I suppose one of the most important questions on my mind and thinking and considering… What is most important for society, human society?

Will Nvidia one day put out their own phone?

ERIC KIM IDEA AND THOUGHT SUPPLY —

PDF

Get your test up suckas!

Saifedean.com

I first started with the bitcoin standard, and then, recently finished the field standard. Excellent very fun book, very approachable primer to slightly unorthodox economic theories, which I personally find entertaining interesting and fun!

And also, the biggest thing… About 90% the book isn’t even about bitcoin; I think Saifedean does a fantastic job in just outlining simple economic principles and ideas, and offering solid critiques against the mainstream notion.

THE ERIC KIM SHOW —

Physicality.

Why Save?

Saving economic value –> to protect and secure economic value?

Protection vehicle armor, armored vehicle?

Resist debasement

Appreciating value

.

Things which have an appreciating value vs things which have a depreciating value? 

If we think about bitcoin like a program, it might be the simplest most minimalist program of all time?

.

Sending bitcoin payments via satellite?

Organized minorities

.

Motivated minority

.

You can ban it, but it will not last

Spontaneous Order, Hayek

Perhaps the reason why studying real economics is interesting or useful is that when there is a strong financial motivation behind things… Things in concepts become more real?

The long run — in the long run, open source works better in the long run

Ironically enough, bitcoin is actually very conservative?

.

Bitcoin is going to eat the lunch of gold

It seems  that in the past, guys who advocated us to buy gold, they were correct. Yet now in the year 2024 and beyond… If they were really smart they would change their opinion, and buy bitcoin?

If you’re a diehard gold holder, I would say maybe just spend 10% of your reserves and buy bitcoin?

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, has had a long-standing critical view of Bitcoin, often calling it a “fraud” and a tool for criminal activities. Despite his negative stance, JPMorgan has explored blockchain technology, using it in its own JPM Coin for facilitating interbank transactions. Interestingly, Dimon has shared that one of his daughters invested in Bitcoin years ago, and while he doesn’t personally support it, he respects others’ rights to buy it. His daughter’s investment, notably, turned a profit, which Dimon acknowledged with a light-hearted jab, suggesting she might be right, but he still views Bitcoin skeptically   .

While Dimon remains unconvinced of Bitcoin’s merits, stating he would be fine with it disappearing entirely,

One theory; when certain things get invented, it simply displaces other goods, technologies and services?

For example, when the elevator operator used to be a manual job, and then automatic elevator elevators got invented… Nobody bemoaned the loss of jobs of elevator operators. Same thing goes with horse and buggy operators. Or telephone operators!

Duh!

Bitcoin as freedom technology?

Too much testosterone!

Too much testosterone!

Video

Trust no skinny fat entrepreneur or investor

ERIC KIM TESTOSTERONE

Trust nobody who can’t lift at least 8 plates?

Low testosterone investors, high testosterone investors?

My body is the Lamborghini & the proof!

—> Trust no skinny fat entrepreneur or investor

Trust nobody who doesn’t deadlift, squat or lift —

Bitcoin …. Satoshi is the new Jesus?

Why Bitcoin might be the most important thing since ,,, anything?

---

Open source money?

It kind of makes sense —

First, assuming that money is a technology, a digital technology, shouldn’t it make sense that money could just be an open source concept?

Everybody knows it

Another big thing… Nobody has any idea how much US dollars are truly in circulation, the M2 supply. The hard cap of 21 million coins, in the whole universe… Everybody knows this number, on the top of their heads.

Real economics?

OK all of these modern day economists, all they try to do is obfuscate their lack of true knowledge, with fake graphs, fix statistics, and fake maths.

EGO GODZILLA GOALS:

First, don’t be like these fake, non-God-fearing, liberal maybe once Christian Protestant, no longer… Who somehow think that the notion of an ego is a moral sin.

True independence?

EGO MONSTER! EGO DRAGON! EGO GODZILLA!

Keep climbing!

No gains, no losses.

In the realm of anabolic steroid use, micro-dosing involves administering very small amounts of steroids at frequent intervals. This approach allows users to experience consistent, subtle effects while reducing the risk of side effects and, importantly, avoiding detection in standard drug tests. Here’s how it works and why it’s gaining popularity among athletes:

1. Consistent Blood Levels: By micro-dosing, athletes maintain stable levels of the substance in their bloodstream, avoiding the peaks and troughs that larger, less frequent doses cause. This stability helps optimize muscle growth, endurance, and recovery without the dramatic hormone fluctuations associated with traditional steroid cycles  .

2. Shortened Detection Windows: Since the doses are small and often involve fast-acting steroids, the substances clear the body more quickly. This means athletes can strategically use steroids close to competition or testing times, with the drugs becoming undetectable before the next test. This method is especially effective with substances like testosterone and trenbolone, which can have brief detection periods when micro-dosed  .

3. Reduced Side Effects: The lower, more frequent doses can minimize common steroid-related side effects such as liver strain, cardiovascular stress, and mood swings. This approach is particularly appealing for individuals sensitive to the side effects of higher steroid doses .

4. Precision with Various Forms: Micro-dosing can be done through injections or topical applications, with subcutaneous injections being popular for a slower, more consistent absorption. This allows users to fine-tune the dose and maintain a controlled release of the steroid over time, aligning with personal fitness goals and reducing health risks .

While micro-dosing is increasingly popular, it is not without risks and still carries the potential for health issues associated with steroid use, such as cardiovascular problems and hormone imbalances. The practice underscores the ongoing battle between athletes seeking performance enhancements and anti-doping agencies working to develop testing methods that can detect these smaller, timed doses .

”gear”, “cycle”— TRT,

xxxx

New steroids and anabolic substances are often administered in various ways, depending on their intended effect, formulation, and the user’s preference. Here are some of the most common methods currently in use:

1. Injectable Steroids: These are among the most prevalent, often administered intramuscularly for faster absorption. Steroids like testosterone and trenbolone are frequently injected directly into muscle tissue, where they slowly release over time. Injectable steroids may provide a more controlled and prolonged effect, which is particularly useful in building muscle mass and strength over extended cycles  .

2. Oral Steroids: Many new steroids are also taken in pill form, which is easier and more convenient than injections. Examples include Dianabol (D-Bol) and Anavar (Var), which are designed for short cycles due to potential liver toxicity when used long-term. Oral steroids generally act faster but have a shorter duration of effect compared to injections .

3. Topical and Transdermal Applications: Steroid creams, gels, and patches are increasingly popular, especially for steroids used in hormone replacement or localized muscle treatments. Transdermal patches and creams release steroids slowly through the skin and are absorbed into the bloodstream, helping to maintain more stable blood levels without the need for frequent dosing .

4. Inhalable and Nasal Sprays: Though less common for anabolic steroids, some performance-enhancing drugs are administered as inhalants. This is more common with corticosteroids or substances that enhance endurance rather than build muscle mass. These formulations are used primarily to target respiratory pathways, providing relief for conditions like asthma while also being adapted for performance in endurance sports .

5. Advanced Delivery Methods: In some cases, new research explores experimental delivery methods, such as micro-dosing, which involves taking very small amounts multiple times a day to avoid detection and reduce potential side effects. Other innovations include time-released capsules or specially designed micro-encapsulation techniques to control the steroid’s release pattern, further optimizing performance gains  .

These administration methods have evolved to optimize effectiveness, manage side effects, and, in some cases, evade detection during drug testing. Advances in technology continue to shape how steroids are used, particularly as athletes seek alternatives that provide performance benefits while minimizing health risks and legal issues.

…

Bodybuilders and weightlifters have developed a variety of slang terms for steroids, often using coded language to discreetly discuss their use. Here are some of the popular terms circulating within these communities:

1. Vitamin S – This term is used humorously to refer to steroids, implying that they are as essential as a vitamin for achieving muscle gains. It’s commonly used when athletes are discussing the benefits or side effects of steroids in a casual way.

2. Rocket Fuel – This expression emphasizes the powerful effects of steroids, likening them to a high-octane fuel that significantly boosts strength and muscle mass. Athletes may use it to refer to potent or fast-acting steroids that they believe give them an edge.

3. Arnolds – Named after Arnold Schwarzenegger, this term pays homage to the famous bodybuilder and is used to refer to anabolic steroids. The term symbolizes strength and the muscular physique associated with steroids.

4. D-Bol, Tren, Var, and Winny – These are shorthand terms for specific steroids: Dianabol (D-Bol), Trenbolone (Tren), Anavar (Var), and Winstrol (Winny). Each is commonly mentioned when discussing different “cycles” (planned steroid usage) among bodybuilders.

5. Thunder Juice – Similar to “rocket fuel,” this term reflects the explosive power that users believe steroids can provide. It’s often used to refer to a mix of multiple steroids or a particularly strong substance.

6. Stackers – Refers to the practice of combining different types of steroids (known as stacking) to enhance their effects. This is a common strategy for users aiming for maximum gains or a specific body composition.

These terms allow users to communicate openly yet discreetly about steroid use, especially in online forums or gym settings where they may want to avoid direct references to illegal substances. Understanding this slang gives insight into how steroid culture has evolved within bodybuilding, often blending humor and secrecy to talk about PEDs without directly naming them.

Sources:

• FluentSlang.com 

• Muscle & Fitness 

• Slang Sensei 

Steph Curry, Michael Jordan, LeBron, Kobe—> all of your favorite athletes, just assume they’re all on the juice.

.

Recent research indicates that despite advancements in anti-doping technology, athletes continue to find ways to bypass drug tests. One method involves micro-dosing substances like erythropoietin (EPO) or testosterone. Athletes take these in small, carefully timed doses that can enhance performance but fall below detectable levels in standard tests. Another approach is the use of masking agents that can interfere with detection, allowing banned substances to go unnoticed.

Blood doping is another popular method, particularly among endurance athletes. This technique involves storing one’s blood and reinfusing it before competition to boost red blood cell counts, thereby increasing oxygen delivery to muscles. While some blood-doping methods are detectable, advancements in self-blood storage have made it more challenging for testers to distinguish between natural and artificially boosted levels.

Additionally, designer drugs and experimental substances remain a persistent issue. These drugs are often newly synthesized and designed to evade current testing protocols. By using compounds not yet banned or recognized by anti-doping agencies, athletes can exploit the lag time between the development of new substances and the establishment of reliable tests to detect them. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and other organizations are now increasingly investing in collaborations with the pharmaceutical industry to stay ahead of these emerging threats.

Lastly, out-of-competition testing gaps provide further opportunities for athletes to use PEDs during training. Despite targeted testing strategies, some athletes still manage to avoid detection by exploiting logistical and timing gaps, particularly in less frequent testing periods or before major competitions, as seen with certain teams before the 2024 Paris Olympics.

These methods illustrate the ongoing challenge for anti-doping agencies to keep pace with new ways that athletes and their teams innovate to bypass drug testing, a dynamic that demands constant adaptation and vigilance in the field of sports testing technology.

Sources: University of Texas (2024), Smithsonian Magazine (2024), RNZ News (2024).

…

While drug testing in sports is designed to catch athletes using performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs), it is not foolproof. There are several ways that athletes, including powerlifters, could potentially evade detection, even if they regularly undergo testing:

1. Timing and Drug Cycles

• Many athletes using steroids follow strict cycles that allow them to stop using drugs long enough before testing so that the substances clear from their systems. The detection windows for certain steroids can vary, and if an athlete times their usage carefully, they might pass drug tests without being clean during training and competition phases .

2. Designer Steroids and Undetectable Drugs

• Some substances are specifically engineered to evade detection by standard tests. Designer steroids and newer PEDs may not be on the testing panels used by organizations. If a compound is not explicitly tested for or recognized by the testing agency, an athlete using it could still technically pass as “clean.” This has been seen in cases such as the BALCO scandal, where athletes used previously undetectable steroids .

3. Masking Agents and Micro-Dosing

• Masking agents can interfere with the ability of tests to detect steroids or other PEDs. Additionally, micro-dosing—taking very small amounts of a drug—can reduce the likelihood of detection, as these doses are often below the threshold that tests are designed to catch. Athletes might use such strategies to maintain some performance benefits without triggering a positive test .

4. Loopholes in Drug Testing Protocols

• Some athletes might take advantage of flaws or inconsistencies in the drug testing protocols of certain federations. For instance, testing might not always be random or might lack stringent oversight. In sports where there is a gap between tests or reliance on infrequent random testing, athletes have a better chance of evading detection by using PEDs outside of testing periods .

5. Genetic and Biological Manipulations

• Techniques like gene doping and other advanced biological manipulations have emerged, allowing some to enhance their performance without traditional steroids. These methods are even harder to detect and might provide substantial advantages similar to those offered by steroids.

While the majority of tested athletes are likely clean, these methods show that it is technically possible for some to use PEDs and still pass as drug-free. As drug testing technology advances, so do the methods of evading detection, making it a continuous race between detection capabilities and methods to circumvent them.

Mike Hall, a pioneering figure in drug-free powerlifting, reached impressive records during his career. At the 1989 American Drug-Free Powerlifting Association (ADFPA) Nationals, Hall achieved a squat of 909.4 pounds, a bench press of 622.8 pounds, and a deadlift of 749.5 pounds, totaling 2,281 pounds. His career-best totals reached as high as 2,336.9 pounds, cementing his status as one of the strongest drug-free lifters of his era. These achievements were groundbreaking, as Hall competed in a time when performance-enhancing drugs were common in powerlifting, yet he consistently set records without their use.

More recently, Austin Perkins is recognized for his drug-free accomplishments, especially notable in the 75-kilogram weight class. In 2023, he broke records with lifts including a 691-pound squat, a 441-pound bench press, and a 744-pound deadlift, totaling 1,819 pounds. His performance also earned him the highest DOTS score ever recorded for a tested lifter, making him a standout in modern drug-free powerlifting.

Both athletes showcase incredible strength within the context of natural, drug-tested competition, illustrating the potential for high-level performance without steroids 

.  .

While drug testing in sports is designed to catch athletes using performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs), it is not foolproof. There are several ways that athletes, including powerlifters, could potentially evade detection, even if they regularly undergo testing:

1. Timing and Drug Cycles

• Many athletes using steroids follow strict cycles that allow them to stop using drugs long enough before testing so that the substances clear from their systems. The detection windows for certain steroids can vary, and if an athlete times their usage carefully, they might pass drug tests without being clean during training and competition phases .

2. Designer Steroids and Undetectable Drugs

• Some substances are specifically engineered to evade detection by standard tests. Designer steroids and newer PEDs may not be on the testing panels used by organizations. If a compound is not explicitly tested for or recognized by the testing agency, an athlete using it could still technically pass as “clean.” This has been seen in cases such as the BALCO scandal, where athletes used previously undetectable steroids .

3. Masking Agents and Micro-Dosing

• Masking agents can interfere with the ability of tests to detect steroids or other PEDs. Additionally, micro-dosing—taking very small amounts of a drug—can reduce the likelihood of detection, as these doses are often below the threshold that tests are designed to catch. Athletes might use such strategies to maintain some performance benefits without triggering a positive test .

4. Loopholes in Drug Testing Protocols

• Some athletes might take advantage of flaws or inconsistencies in the drug testing protocols of certain federations. For instance, testing might not always be random or might lack stringent oversight. In sports where there is a gap between tests or reliance on infrequent random testing, athletes have a better chance of evading detection by using PEDs outside of testing periods .

5. Genetic and Biological Manipulations

• Techniques like gene doping and other advanced biological manipulations have emerged, allowing some to enhance their performance without traditional steroids. These methods are even harder to detect and might provide substantial advantages similar to those offered by steroids.

While the majority of tested athletes are likely clean, these methods show that it is technically possible for some to use PEDs and still pass as drug-free. As drug testing technology advances, so do the methods of evading detection, making it a continuous race between detection capabilities and methods to circumvent them.

Jay-Z and Jack Dorsey jointly invested 500 Bitcoin (BTC) into a fund called ₿trust in February 2021, aimed at supporting Bitcoin development in Africa and India. This fund, valued at around $23 million today, was their most publicized Bitcoin investment, but specific details on their personal Bitcoin holdings have not been disclosed. Both Jay-Z and Dorsey are known for their support of cryptocurrency, with Dorsey particularly vocal about Bitcoin’s potential as a global currency .

Balls & Bitcoin —

Increase your testosterone, your balls, your courage your manliness… Get more bitcoin, become more powerful.

---

Long Bitcoin

CRYPTO BY KIM

Brave new world for photographers and crypto:

1. BUY IT ON DISCOUNT!
2. BITCOIN IS THE INTERNET 2.0?
3. ALL BITCOIN EVERYTHING
4. Self-Custody
5. HOLD OR CIRCULATE?
6. BITCOIN OR BUST
7. BITCOIN THOUGHTS
8. Bitcoin is Sexy
9. Fuck the Banks!
10. Ethereum?
11. Why Chainlink?
12. BIG AMOUNTS, SMALL AMOUNTS?
13. CRYPTO, CRYPTOCURRENCY THOUGHTS.
14. The Philosophy of Crypto
15. BITCOIN SHALL BE THE LAST CRYPTO STANDING.
16. Bitcoin Price Prediction
17. Trust chainlink for the most accurate prices for bitcoin or any other crypto
18. BITCOIN
19. There is No Web 3.0
20. 2 cents to 2 dollars?
21. Crypto.com?
22. Speculation vs Investing
23. Building with Bitcoin
24. DYNAMICS VS STATICS.
25. How Do You Know if the Timing Is Right?
26. BITCOIN IN THE NEWS
27. BITCOIN & UNCERTAINTY
28. Fake Money
29. Why I Bought More Bitcoin (Again)
30. How I Made Money with Crypto
31. Better to buy Dogecoin then buy a Tesla
32. NO LIMITS.
33. ALL DIGITAL FUTURE.
34. Digital over Physical Possessions
35. DIGIBYTE.
36. CHAINLINK.
37. The Excitement of Starting from Zero
38. HAPTIC INDUSTRIES NOW ACCEPTING CRYPTO AND BITCOIN
39. In Praise of Crypto
40. JUST BUY IT.
41. Why I’m So Bullish on Bitcoin
42. Bitcoin as the Simplest Cryptocurrency
43. Why I bought (more) bitcoin
44. Once You Become a Crypto Billionaire, Then What?
45. Why Crypto is Under-Hyped
46. The Joy of Speculation
47. BITCOIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCY FOR PHOTOGRAPHERS
48. Why I Bought Bitcoin
49. Crypto Photography
50. Crypto Thoughts
51. On Making Money from Nothing
52. BITCOIN THOUGHTS
53. Bitcoin is Sexy
54. Fuck the Banks!
55. Ethereum?
56. Why Chainlink?
57. BIG AMOUNTS, SMALL AMOUNTS?
58. CRYPTO, CRYPTOCURRENCY THOUGHTS.
59. The Philosophy of Crypto
60. BITCOIN SHALL BE THE LAST CRYPTO STANDING.
61. Bitcoin Price Prediction
62. Trust chainlink for the most accurate prices for bitcoin or any other crypto
63. BITCOIN
64. There is No Web 3.0
65. 2 cents to 2 dollars?
66. Crypto.com?
67. Speculation vs Investing
68. Building with Bitcoin
69. DYNAMICS VS STATICS.
70. How Do You Know if the Timing Is Right?
71. BITCOIN IN THE NEWS
72. BITCOIN & UNCERTAINTY
73. Fake Money
74. Why I Bought More Bitcoin (Again)
75. How I Made Money with Crypto
76. Better to buy Dogecoin then buy a Tesla
77. NO LIMITS.
78. ALL DIGITAL FUTURE.
79. Digital over Physical Possessions
80. DIGIBYTE.
81. CHAINLINK.
82. The Excitement of Starting from Zero
83. HAPTIC INDUSTRIES NOW ACCEPTING CRYPTO AND BITCOIN
84. In Praise of Crypto
85. JUST BUY IT.
86. Why I’m So Bullish on Bitcoin
87. Bitcoin as the Simplest Cryptocurrency
88. Why I bought (more) bitcoin
89. Once You Become a Crypto Billionaire, Then What?
90. Why Crypto is Under-Hyped
91. The Joy of Speculation
92. BITCOIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCY FOR PHOTOGRAPHERS
93. Why I Bought Bitcoin
94. Crypto Photography
95. Crypto Thoughts
96. On Making Money from Nothing

My whole critique on the whole “functional fitness” concept … modern day life and times… Truth be told, nothing is functional anymore.

In some ways, everything becomes an ethic, an ethos — a philosophy, concept and approach.

For example, in modern day times, the ultimate power is economic monetary power. Which is bitcoin. Therefore anything that has to deal with buying bitcoin accumulating bitcoin or growing it, will be the ultimate power.

Safe, unharmed — salvus. Saviour—> as keeping people unharmed and safe?

.

In Ancient Greek and Latin, words related to “saving” or “protection” were quite common, given their importance in both religious and everyday contexts. Here are the primary terms and their meanings:

Latin:

1. Salvare – This is the verb meaning “to save” or “to make safe,” from which the English “save” ultimately derives. It is related to the Latin adjective salvus, meaning “safe” or “unharmed.”

2. Servare – Another Latin verb meaning “to preserve,” “to keep,” or “to guard.” While it doesn’t mean “save” in the rescue sense, it involves protection and careful keeping, and it is related to words like “preserve” in English.

3. Salus – This noun means “safety,” “health,” or “well-being.” It is the root of English words like “salutation” (originally a greeting wishing someone good health) and “salvation.”

Ancient Greek:

1. Σῴζειν (Sōzein) – This verb means “to save,” “to keep safe,” or “to rescue.” It is often used in religious contexts, such as saving the soul. This is the Greek word most directly equivalent to the Latin salvare.

2. Σωτηρία (Sōtēria) – A noun meaning “salvation,” “deliverance,” or “safety.” It is the root of the name Soter, often used in titles to mean “Savior,” and also linked to concepts of spiritual salvation.

3. Σῶος (Sōos) – An adjective meaning “safe” or “unharmed,” similar in meaning to the Latin salvus.

These terms capture similar themes of safety, preservation, and rescue in both languages, reflecting their importance in both practical and spiritual contexts.

…

The word “save” comes from the Old French word “sauver,” which means “to save, protect, keep safe.” This Old French term originated from the Latin word “salvare,” which also means “to save” or “to make safe.” The Latin root “salvare” is derived from “salvus,” meaning “safe” or “unharmed.”

In English, “save” has been used since around the 13th century with meanings related to keeping safe, preserving, or rescuing from harm or danger. Over time, its use has expanded to include meanings like storing or conserving something for future use, especially in modern contexts like computer files.

Here are some notable recent studies on color psychology:

1. Effects of Color on Cognitive Performance: A study by Shi et al. (2015) found that red negatively impacts cognitive tasks requiring high focus, like exams. This research revealed that participants exposed to red before a task performed worse than those who saw green or black. The study aligns with other findings that red can signal caution and increase anxiety, which may impair intellectual performance in certain contexts .

2. Color and Emotion Associations: A 2020 global study involving over 4,500 participants from 30 countries examined emotional responses to different colors. Results showed that red is widely associated with love, while blue is linked to calmness and contentment, and black to sadness. This study supports the idea that certain color-emotion associations may be universal, although cultural influences also play a role .

3. Color and Physiological Arousal: Research has shown that color can influence physiological responses. For instance, one study found that exposure to red light increases heart rate and arousal more than green light does. This aligns with findings from Wilson’s 1966 study on color and arousal, suggesting that red has stimulating effects, potentially useful in settings where energy is desirable .

4. Impact of Color on Memory: Kuhbander and Pekrun (2013) explored how colors affect memory. They discovered that red enhances memory for negative content, while green improves recall of positive material. These findings suggest that color influences not only emotional perception but also cognitive processing of different types of information .

5. Color and Social Perception: Research has examined the social implications of color, particularly in competitive contexts. For example, athletes wearing red uniforms often perform better, possibly due to red’s association with dominance and aggression. Additionally, red clothing on individuals can increase perceived attractiveness and dominance, making it a color with significant social signaling effects  .

6. Environmental Color and Well-being: A study by Grube (2014) looked at the effects of white walls in classrooms and found that they could increase stress and reduce concentration. This research suggests that while white is often associated with cleanliness, it can have unintended negative effects on mood and productivity in certain settings, highlighting the importance of color in environment design .

These studies contribute to a growing understanding of color psychology, illustrating the complex ways colors can influence emotional, cognitive, and social behaviors.

..l

Recent research in color psychology has uncovered intriguing ways colors influence our emotions, behaviors, and even cognitive performance. Modern studies show that color perception is complex and can affect various psychological functions, such as mood, energy levels, and memory. For example, red has been found to increase arousal and can enhance memory retention for negative content, while green tends to promote calmness and improve memory for positive content. These associations appear to be somewhat universal, yet they also vary based on individual differences and cultural contexts  .

Advances in color science explore how specific colors can affect cognitive performance and emotional responses. Studies indicate that colors like red can increase alertness and foster dominance in social settings. This has implications for competitive environments, as red can lead to improved athletic performance and perceived aggressiveness. Conversely, exposure to blue light has been linked to enhanced alertness and focus, which can be particularly beneficial in work or study environments  .

Beyond these individual effects, colors also play a role in how people perceive products and brands. Blue is often associated with trust and quality, making it a popular choice for corporate logos and retail environments. Additionally, certain colors have been shown to influence consumer behavior, with red increasing appetite and energy levels, making it a frequent choice for restaurants .

This research highlights the importance of controlled conditions in color studies to accurately measure the effects of hue, chroma, and lightness on human psychology. While the field is growing, challenges remain in standardizing methodologies to control for variables like lighting and environmental color interactions, which affect the reliability of findings .

The expanding understanding of color psychology offers valuable insights for applications in areas like interior design, marketing, and therapy, suggesting that color can be a powerful tool for shaping experiences and influencing behaviors.

Yes, several scientific studies have investigated the psychological effects of red and black, particularly in the context of power, competition, and authority. Here are a few notable examples:

1. Red and Competitive Power:

• A 2005 study led by Russell Hill and Robert Barton examined the impact of red on competitive outcomes. The researchers analyzed data from the 2004 Olympic Games and found that athletes competing in red were more likely to win in combat sports than those wearing blue. They suggested that red might signal dominance and aggression, potentially giving an advantage in competitive situations .

• Another study conducted by Andrew Elliot and Daniela Niesta in 2008 focused on red’s impact in romantic and social contexts. They found that red increased perceptions of attractiveness and desirability, suggesting that it conveys a form of social power as well as competitive advantage .

2. Black and Authority:

• A study by Frank and Gilovich in 1988 examined the psychological effects of wearing black uniforms among NHL and NFL teams. They discovered that teams wearing black were more likely to receive penalties due to perceptions of aggressiveness. This suggests that black may convey authority and intimidation, which could be seen as a form of power, especially in contexts where control and formality are emphasized .

• Additionally, research published in Psychology Today highlights how black is often associated with sophistication and formality, making it a color that communicates authority in professional and business settings. People in black attire are often perceived as more serious and powerful, particularly in Western cultures .

3. Comparative Studies:

• A more recent study explored by the journal Frontiers in Psychology in 2022 investigated the emotional effects of different lighting and colored environments, including red and black. This study confirmed that red tends to raise arousal and emotional intensity, while black is associated with feelings of control and respect. The findings suggest that the context of use (e.g., competitive, professional) strongly influences how these colors are perceived in terms of power .

These studies highlight how both red and black can convey different types of power, depending on the context. Red tends to evoke competitive energy and social dominance, while black conveys authority and formality. Each color’s effect varies with cultural associations, personal experiences, and specific situations, underscoring the complexity of color psychology.

….

When choosing between red and black as the color of power, it depends on the type of power you want to project:

Red

• Dynamic and Energizing: Red is an intense, eye-catching color that stimulates energy and excitement. It is often associated with action, urgency, and assertiveness.

• Emotional Impact: Red triggers strong emotional responses, which can convey passion, love, and aggression. It’s commonly used in settings where you want to attract attention or provoke a reaction  .

• Symbol of Competitiveness: Red is frequently used in sports and competitive contexts, where it conveys strength, determination, and dominance. Studies have even shown that athletes wearing red are perceived as more formidable .

Black

• Authority and Formality: Black symbolizes control, sophistication, and authority. It’s commonly used in professional settings and is considered a color of elegance and prestige. This is why black is a staple in business and formal attire, as well as in luxury branding.

• Subtle Power: Black is less about demanding attention and more about commanding respect. It’s a color that represents power in a quieter, more controlled way.

• Neutral and Timeless: Black is versatile and less likely to evoke strong emotional reactions, making it suitable for situations where a reserved, sophisticated presence is desired  .

In summary, if you want to project energy and intensity, red is the way to go. But if you’re aiming for authority and sophistication, black may be the better choice. Both colors are powerful, but they evoke different styles and messages.

The color most commonly associated with power is black. Black conveys authority, strength, and sophistication, which is why it’s often used in formal and professional settings. It is frequently seen in business attire, like suits, as well as in high-fashion designs and luxury branding  .

Red is another color linked to power, but it has a different type of impact. Red symbolizes passion, intensity, and energy, often drawing attention and creating a sense of urgency. It’s associated with both love and anger, indicating power in emotional and competitive contexts. For example, red is often used in sports uniforms to convey strength and assertiveness  .

Lastly, purple has historical connections to royalty and wealth. This stems from the rarity and cost of purple dye in ancient times. Today, purple is still seen as a color of luxury, wisdom, and power, often found in branding for high-end products or creative industries  .

Each of these colors brings a unique aspect to the concept of power: black represents authority, red conveys passion and action, and purple suggests wealth and sophistication.

…

Recent research into color psychology has shown that colors have significant effects on human moods, emotions, and even physical responses. Here are some key findings:

1. Red: Known for its stimulating properties, red can boost energy and increase alertness, making it a popular choice in areas where activity and movement are desired, like gyms. However, red can also increase stress and anxiety, so it’s best used in moderation or in settings where energy and excitement are beneficial  .

2. Blue and Green: These cool colors are linked to calmness, relaxation, and mental clarity. Blue is often associated with feelings of peace and trustworthiness, making it ideal for workspaces or bedrooms. Similarly, green, often connected to nature and growth, promotes feelings of balance and renewal, and has been found to enhance creative thinking  .

3. Yellow: Often associated with joy and warmth, yellow can boost mood and create a sense of happiness. It’s frequently used in kitchens and social spaces to stimulate conversations and positive interactions. However, too much yellow, especially if very bright, can sometimes lead to feelings of frustration or agitation  .

4. Purple: This color is tied to creativity, sophistication, and spirituality. Lighter shades can bring a peaceful, calming effect, while deeper tones evoke a sense of luxury and mystery. Purple’s versatility makes it suitable for spaces where a soothing yet inspiring environment is desired .

5. Orange: A warm, vibrant color, orange is known for its ability to increase energy and enthusiasm. It’s ideal for social spaces as it encourages conversation and positivity. However, like red, it can be overwhelming if overused  .

In addition to these color effects, researchers have found that the brightness and saturation of colors also play a role. Brighter, less saturated colors (like sage green) tend to be more relaxing, while highly saturated colors (like sapphire blue) are more energizing. Adjusting these factors can further tailor the emotional impact of colors within different spaces  .

These findings suggest that by strategically choosing and combining colors, individuals and designers can create environments that not only reflect personal aesthetics but also improve mood and well-being.

Becoming a Bitcoin warrior — make Bitcoin panzer image

Becoming a Bitcoin warrior —

To think off the grid — to think off the grid, to think philosophically … off the grid!

Grip strength, the ability to exert force with the hands and forearms, is a complex trait influenced by various physiological mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms provides insight into how grip strength is developed, maintained, and how it correlates with overall health and functional capacity. Below is a comprehensive exploration of the physiological underpinnings of grip strength.

1. Muscular Anatomy Involved in Grip Strength

a. Primary Muscle Groups

1. Forearm Flexors and Extensors

• Flexor Muscles: Including the flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor digitorum profundus, and flexor pollicis longus, these muscles are primarily responsible for finger flexion and grip closure.

• Extensor Muscles: Such as the extensor digitorum and extensor pollicis longus, these muscles aid in finger extension and stabilization during gripping tasks.

2. Intrinsic Hand Muscles

• Thenar and Hypothenar Muscles: These muscles control thumb and little finger movements, contributing to grip strength and dexterity.

• Interossei and Lumbricals: These small muscles assist in finger abduction, adduction, and flexion, enhancing grip stability.

3. Upper Arm and Shoulder Muscles

• Biceps Brachii and Brachialis: These muscles contribute to forearm flexion, indirectly supporting grip strength.

• Deltoids and Trapezius: These muscles stabilize the shoulder girdle, providing a stable base for grip-related movements.

b. Muscle Fiber Composition

• Type I (Slow-Twitch) Fibers: These fibers are more fatigue-resistant and are involved in maintaining sustained grips, such as holding an object for an extended period.

• Type II (Fast-Twitch) Fibers: These fibers generate greater force and are essential for powerful, short-duration grips, like crushing an object quickly.

The proportion of these fiber types varies among individuals and can influence grip strength and endurance.

2. Neurological Control

a. Motor Unit Recruitment

Grip strength depends on the efficient recruitment of motor units (a motor neuron and the muscle fibers it innervates). Effective recruitment ensures that the necessary number of muscle fibers are activated to generate the required force.

b. Neural Coordination and Synchronization

Coordinated activation of multiple muscle groups is essential for a strong and stable grip. The central nervous system (CNS) orchestrates the timing and intensity of muscle contractions to optimize grip strength.

c. Proprioception and Feedback Mechanisms

Sensory receptors in the muscles, tendons, and joints provide feedback to the CNS about limb position and force exerted. This proprioceptive feedback is crucial for adjusting grip strength dynamically during various tasks.

3. Biomechanical Factors

a. Hand and Finger Anatomy

• Bone Structure: The length and robustness of the bones in the hands and fingers affect leverage and force generation.

• Joint Mechanics: The range of motion and stability of the wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), and interphalangeal (IP) joints influence grip efficiency.

b. Tendon and Ligament Function

Strong and flexible tendons and ligaments support the transfer of force from muscles to bones, enhancing grip strength. Tendon stiffness can affect the rate of force transmission and overall grip performance.

c. Leverage and Force Transmission

Optimal alignment of bones and joints allows for maximal force transmission from the muscles to the gripping object. Poor biomechanics can reduce grip efficiency and increase the risk of injury.

4. Metabolic and Energy Systems

a. ATP Production and Utilization

Muscle contractions require adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for energy. Efficient ATP production and utilization are critical for sustaining grip strength, especially during prolonged or repetitive gripping tasks.

b. Lactate Threshold and Fatigue Resistance

The ability to tolerate and clear lactate produced during anaerobic metabolism affects grip endurance. Higher lactate thresholds allow for sustained grip strength without rapid onset of fatigue.

5. Hormonal Influences

a. Testosterone and Growth Hormone

These anabolic hormones promote muscle hypertrophy (growth) and strength. Higher levels contribute to greater muscle mass and, consequently, increased grip strength.

b. Cortisol and Catabolic Processes

Chronic elevation of cortisol can lead to muscle catabolism (breakdown), reducing muscle mass and grip strength over time.

6. Genetic Factors

a. Muscle Fiber Composition

Genetic predisposition influences the proportion of Type I and Type II muscle fibers, affecting both grip strength and endurance.

b. Tendon Insertion Points and Bone Structure

Genetic variations in bone structure and tendon insertion points can impact leverage and force transmission, thereby influencing grip strength.

7. Age-Related Changes

a. Sarcopenia

Age-related loss of muscle mass and strength (sarcopenia) leads to decreased grip strength. Maintaining muscle mass through resistance training can mitigate this decline.

b. Neural Decline

Aging is associated with reduced motor unit recruitment and slower neural conduction, which can impair grip strength and coordination.

c. Joint and Connective Tissue Degeneration

Degenerative changes in joints and connective tissues can limit range of motion and reduce grip efficiency.

8. Training and Adaptations

a. Strength Training

Progressive resistance training enhances muscle size (hypertrophy), neural efficiency, and motor unit recruitment, leading to increased grip strength.

b. Specific Grip Exercises

Exercises like deadlifts, farmer’s walks, and using hand grippers specifically target the muscles involved in grip, promoting strength and endurance.

c. Neuromuscular Adaptations

Regular training improves the CNS’s ability to coordinate muscle contractions, enhancing grip strength through better neural control.

9. Nutritional Influences

a. Protein Intake

Adequate protein intake supports muscle repair and growth, essential for developing and maintaining grip strength.

b. Micronutrients

Vitamins and minerals, such as vitamin D, calcium, and magnesium, play roles in muscle function and bone health, indirectly supporting grip strength.

c. Hydration

Proper hydration is crucial for optimal muscle function and preventing fatigue during gripping tasks.

10. Pathological Conditions Affecting Grip Strength

a. Neuromuscular Disorders

Conditions like carpal tunnel syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, and muscular dystrophies can impair grip strength by affecting nerves and muscles.

b. Musculoskeletal Injuries

Injuries to the hand, wrist, forearm, or upper arm can limit grip strength due to pain, inflammation, or structural damage.

c. Systemic Diseases

Chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases can reduce grip strength through various mechanisms, including inflammation, muscle wasting, and reduced physical activity.

11. Psychological Factors

a. Motivation and Effort

An individual’s willingness to exert maximum effort can influence grip strength measurements, especially in voluntary tasks.

b. Pain and Discomfort

Psychological responses to pain or discomfort during gripping tasks can limit the ability to generate maximal grip strength.

12. Conclusion

Grip strength is a multifaceted attribute governed by intricate physiological mechanisms encompassing muscular, neurological, biomechanical, hormonal, genetic, and metabolic factors. It serves not only as a measure of hand and forearm function but also as an indicator of overall health and functional capacity. Understanding these underlying mechanisms can inform training protocols, clinical assessments, and interventions aimed at enhancing grip strength and, by extension, improving general health and quality of life.

References:

1. Bohannon, R. W. (2019). Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker for Older Adults. Clinical Geriatrics Medicine, 35(1), 49-56.

2. Farina, D., Negro, F., Rossini, P. M., & Cattaneo, L. (2014). Are there common and specific neural command for finger and wrist muscles during gripping? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 171.

3. Meskers, C. G. M., Fling, B. W., Thomis, M., et al. (2007). The relationship between hand grip strength and lower limb muscle strength and muscle mass in older adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 101(4), 491-498.

4. Rantanen, T., Guralnik, J. M., Foley, D., Masaki, K., Leveille, S. G., Curb, J. D., & White, L. R. (1999). Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(6), 558-560.

5. Thompson, W. R. (2017). Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2018: the CREP edition. ACSMS Health & Fitness Journal, 21(6), 10-19.

Grip strength has increasingly been recognized as a valuable indicator of overall strength, health, and longevity. Research has shown that grip strength correlates not only with muscle mass but also with a range of health outcomes, making it a strong predictor of general well-being and life expectancy.

Connection to Overall Health and Longevity

Grip strength is often considered a proxy for total body strength and physical capability. It is commonly measured using a dynamometer, a device that assesses how much force one can exert through their grip. Strong grip strength has been linked to higher bone density, better cardiovascular health, and lower risks of chronic diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. It also correlates with reduced risk of falls, fractures, and even cognitive decline as people age. Because grip strength reflects overall muscle function, declines in grip strength are often associated with frailty and a higher likelihood of adverse health events, especially in older adults. This makes it an important tool for identifying early signs of health decline and assessing a person’s functional capabilities over time (Cleveland Clinic; Edward-Elmhurst Health).

Predicting Longevity

Studies have shown that higher grip strength is associated with slower biological aging and a lower likelihood of mortality. For instance, research suggests that stronger grip strength is inversely related to markers of biological aging, such as DNA methylation, which can affect cell aging and life expectancy. Those with lower grip strength tend to experience accelerated biological aging and are more susceptible to health complications, making grip strength a significant marker in evaluating a person’s longevity potential (Stanford Center on Longevity; Medline Newsroom).

Implications for Physical and Mental Health

In addition to physical health, grip strength has also been connected to mental and cognitive well-being. Declines in grip strength can limit mobility, which in turn may lead to reduced social interaction and physical activity, potentially contributing to feelings of isolation, depression, and even cognitive decline. Maintaining strong grip strength through exercises, such as squeezing a racquetball or resistance training, can help improve both physical endurance and quality of life. This has encouraged healthcare providers to consider grip strength as an easy-to-measure biomarker for assessing health risks and guiding treatment approaches (Health Cleveland Clinic; Edward-Elmhurst Health).

Overall, grip strength provides a window into an individual’s overall physical health, resilience, and functional independence, making it a simple yet powerful metric in both clinical and everyday health assessments.

Grip strength is more than just a measure of hand and forearm power; it serves as a valuable indicator of overall muscular strength, functional capacity, and general health. Understanding the connections between grip strength and broader aspects of physical well-being can inform training practices, health assessments, and interventions aimed at improving quality of life. Below is a comprehensive exploration of these relationships.

1. Grip Strength as a Proxy for Overall Muscular Strength

a. Neurological and Muscular Correlations

Grip strength involves multiple muscle groups, including those in the hands, forearms, wrists, and even the upper arms and shoulders. The ability to generate force in the grip often reflects the neurological efficiency and muscular capacity of these and related muscle groups. Because grip strength exercises engage large muscle groups and require coordination, improvements in grip strength typically correlate with gains in overall muscular strength.

b. Measurement Simplicity and Reliability

Grip strength is relatively easy to measure using devices like hand dynamometers. Its simplicity and reliability make it a practical proxy for assessing general strength without the need for complex testing protocols that evaluate different muscle groups separately.

2. Grip Strength as an Indicator of General Health

a. Predictive of Mortality and Morbidity

Numerous studies have linked lower grip strength to higher risks of mortality and morbidity. For example, weaker grip strength has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, respiratory issues, and even certain cancers. It serves as a general marker for an individual’s overall health status.

b. Association with Chronic Conditions

Grip strength has been inversely related to the prevalence of chronic conditions such as diabetes, arthritis, and osteoporosis. It reflects the cumulative effects of these conditions on muscular and skeletal health.

c. Indicator of Frailty and Functional Decline

In older adults, grip strength is a key component of frailty assessments. Lower grip strength can indicate a higher likelihood of falls, disability, and a decline in activities of daily living (ADLs), thereby serving as an early warning sign for functional decline.

3. Physiological Mechanisms Linking Grip Strength to Overall Health

a. Muscle Mass and Quality

Grip strength correlates with overall muscle mass and muscle quality (e.g., muscle fiber composition, fat infiltration). Reduced muscle mass (sarcopenia) is a risk factor for various health issues, including metabolic syndrome and decreased mobility.

b. Inflammation and Metabolic Health

Chronic inflammation and poor metabolic health can impair muscle function. Grip strength, as a marker of muscle health, indirectly reflects these underlying physiological states.

c. Hormonal Factors

Hormones such as testosterone and growth hormone influence muscle strength. Lower levels of these hormones can lead to decreased grip strength and are also associated with broader health concerns like osteoporosis and decreased libido.

4. Grip Strength in Clinical and Research Settings

a. Health Assessments

Healthcare providers often include grip strength measurements in routine check-ups, especially for older adults, to assess risk factors for various health conditions and to monitor the effectiveness of interventions.

b. Rehabilitation and Recovery

Grip strength is used to evaluate progress in rehabilitation programs for individuals recovering from injuries, surgeries, or illnesses that affect muscular and neurological function.

c. Research Applications

In research, grip strength serves as a convenient and standardized measure to study the effects of lifestyle factors, such as diet and exercise, on overall health and longevity.

5. Enhancing Grip Strength for Improved Overall Health

a. Resistance Training

Engaging in resistance training exercises that target the hands, forearms, and upper body can significantly improve grip strength. These exercises also contribute to overall muscular development and metabolic health.

b. Functional Exercises

Incorporating functional movements, such as deadlifts, pull-ups, and kettlebell exercises, not only enhances grip strength but also promotes coordination, balance, and overall physical fitness.

c. Flexibility and Mobility

Maintaining flexibility and mobility in the wrists, hands, and forearms supports optimal grip function and reduces the risk of injury, contributing to sustained overall health.

6. Supporting Evidence and Studies

a. Epidemiological Studies

Large-scale epidemiological studies, such as those conducted within the UK Biobank, have demonstrated that lower grip strength is associated with higher all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and incidence of several chronic diseases.

b. Longitudinal Research

Longitudinal studies have shown that declines in grip strength over time are predictive of future health declines, reinforcing its role as a dynamic indicator of health status.

c. Meta-Analyses

Meta-analyses aggregating data from multiple studies have confirmed the robust association between grip strength and various health outcomes, strengthening the evidence base for its use in clinical and research settings.

7. Practical Implications

a. Early Detection and Intervention

Regular monitoring of grip strength can facilitate early detection of health issues, allowing for timely interventions that can prevent or mitigate more serious conditions.

b. Personalized Fitness Programs

Understanding an individual’s grip strength can help tailor fitness programs to address specific weaknesses, promote balanced muscular development, and enhance overall functional capacity.

c. Public Health Strategies

Public health initiatives aimed at improving population-level grip strength through community-based exercise programs can contribute to broader health improvements and reduce the burden of chronic diseases.

8. Conclusion

Grip strength serves as a valuable and multifaceted indicator of overall muscular strength, functional capacity, and general health. Its simplicity and reliability make it an essential tool in both clinical and research settings. By understanding and leveraging the connections between grip strength and broader health parameters, individuals and healthcare providers can better assess health risks, monitor progress, and implement effective interventions to enhance quality of life.

References:

1. Bohannon, R. W. (2019). Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker for Older Adults. Clinical Geriatrics Medicine, 35(1), 49-56.

2. Leong, D. P., Teo, K. K., Rangarajan, S., et al. (2015). Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet, 386(9990), 266-273.

3. Rantanen, T., Guralnik, J. M., Foley, D., et al. (1999). Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(6), 558-560.

4. Ruiz, J. R., Alonso, J., Pérula, M., et al. (2008). Hand grip strength in adults: normative data in the general population. Age and Ageing, 37(6), 658-662.

…

Laissez-faire is a French term that translates to “let do” or “let it be,” and it refers to an economic philosophy advocating minimal government intervention in the marketplace. Rooted in the 18th-century ideas of classical liberalism, laissez-faire economics is based on the belief that free markets, when left alone, naturally regulate themselves through the forces of supply and demand.

Origins and Key Principles

The term “laissez-faire” is often attributed to French economists in the 1700s, particularly Vincent de Gournay and François Quesnay, a leader of the Physiocrats. The Physiocrats were a group of Enlightenment thinkers who believed that the wealth of nations was derived primarily from agriculture and that natural economic laws should govern society. They argued that state intervention disrupted the natural order, and hence the phrase “laissez-faire, laissez-passer” (let do, let pass) became associated with their philosophy.

Philosophical Foundation

Laissez-faire economics is closely aligned with the work of Adam Smith, particularly his seminal work The Wealth of Nations (1776). Smith argued that individuals pursuing their own self-interest inadvertently contribute to the economic well-being of society through an “invisible hand” that guides resources to their most efficient uses. This idea formed the basis for the belief that markets are best regulated by competition, with minimal interference from the government.

Key principles of laissez-faire economics include:

• Individual Freedom: People should have the liberty to produce, buy, and sell as they see fit without undue government restrictions.

• Limited Government: The state should primarily protect property rights, enforce contracts, and maintain peace, refraining from economic intervention.

• Natural Order: Laissez-faire economists believe that markets operate best when they follow their natural course, as opposed to being regulated by artificial constraints.

Historical Impact and Criticism

Laissez-faire policies became particularly influential during the Industrial Revolution, especially in the United States and Britain, where minimal government intervention allowed for rapid industrial growth. However, this approach also led to problems, including poor working conditions, environmental degradation, and extreme wealth inequality.

In the 20th century, laissez-faire economics faced criticism for ignoring social welfare and enabling corporate monopolies. The Great Depression of the 1930s spurred a shift towards Keynesian economics, which argued that government intervention was necessary to stabilize economies. Today, pure laissez-faire is rare, but its principles continue to influence modern economic policies that favor deregulation, free trade, and limited government involvement in business.

Laissez-faire remains a foundational concept in economic theory, with debates around its merits and drawbacks continuing to shape political and economic discourse.

In Pacific Rim, humanity faces a monstrous threat from the depths of the Pacific Ocean: the Kaiju, creatures that threaten to obliterate human civilization. The only defense is the Jaegers, colossal robots piloted by two individuals whose minds must merge into a single consciousness, working in perfect synchrony. For Eric Kim, an advocate for personal growth and introspection, Pacific Rim presents more than a story of giant robots battling alien creatures. It’s a profound meditation on human resilience, the power of collaboration, and the courage required to confront our inner and outer demons. Through the voice of Eric Kim, we can view the film not just as a spectacle, but as a framework for self-discovery and inner strength.

Confronting Inner Monsters: The Symbolism of Kaiju

The Kaiju in Pacific Rim are metaphors for the internal struggles and fears that we all harbor. In Kim’s perspective, these creatures are not simply physical threats; they symbolize the anxieties, doubts, and insecurities that often loom large in our lives. Just as the Kaiju emerge from an abyss, our personal monsters arise from the hidden depths of our consciousness. Confronting them demands bravery and a willingness to face our shadow selves.

Kim often emphasizes that personal growth requires embracing our vulnerabilities rather than suppressing them. In Pacific Rim, humanity’s victory hinges on its ability to confront these monsters directly rather than ignore them. The Jaegers, as manifestations of our collective strength, embody the idea that facing our fears is a transformative act. By engaging with these fears head-on, we not only gain control over them but also reclaim power over our lives. In this way, Pacific Rim aligns with Kim’s philosophy that confronting one’s inner darkness is an essential step toward self-mastery.

The Drift: A Metaphor for Human Connection

The concept of the Drift, the neural link that allows two pilots to operate a Jaeger, is a powerful metaphor for human connection. In Kim’s interpretation, the Drift represents the vulnerability and openness required to form authentic connections with others. To be in the Drift is to share not only thoughts but also memories, emotions, and traumas. It is an act of surrender, a fusion of two minds into a singular, harmonious consciousness.

For Kim, this merging of consciousness mirrors the process of genuine human connection, where individuals must let down their defenses and allow themselves to be seen fully. In the Drift, pilots must trust one another completely, accepting each other’s strengths and weaknesses as their own. This bond, forged through shared experiences and mutual vulnerability, is what allows them to achieve greatness together. In this sense, Pacific Rim speaks to Kim’s belief in the transformative power of collaboration. It is not enough to face challenges alone; by embracing others and working together, we can accomplish feats that would be impossible on our own.

Resilience Through Unity: The Jaegers as Symbols of Strength

Each Jaeger in Pacific Rim is a testament to humanity’s resilience. These towering machines are not merely tools of war; they are symbols of hope, endurance, and the human spirit’s capacity to overcome adversity. Kim often speaks about the importance of resilience—the idea that setbacks and hardships are not obstacles, but opportunities to grow stronger. In the film, humanity builds Jaegers not just as weapons, but as monuments to their determination to survive and protect what they hold dear.

Kim might see the Jaegers as external representations of the internal resilience that each person possesses. Just as these machines are designed to withstand the Kaiju’s relentless attacks, humans, too, are capable of withstanding life’s challenges through inner strength and perseverance. This aligns with Kim’s philosophy that life’s struggles are not to be avoided but embraced as part of the journey. By building Jaegers, humanity is choosing to confront its fears, to rise and fight rather than retreat. In Kim’s words, this act of resilience is the ultimate affirmation of life.

The Collective Strength of Humanity

Pacific Rim ultimately presents a vision of global unity, where people from all cultures and backgrounds come together to fight a common threat. This collective effort reflects Kim’s belief in the power of community and the idea that we are stronger together. In a world where division and isolation are prevalent, the film’s portrayal of international cooperation is a hopeful reminder that humanity can achieve great things when united by a shared purpose.

Kim often discusses the importance of surrounding oneself with supportive individuals, emphasizing that personal growth is amplified within a community. In Pacific Rim, the Jaeger pilots, scientists, and engineers form a diverse coalition, each bringing unique strengths to the fight. Their victory is a testament to the idea that true strength lies not in individual prowess but in collective effort. Through this lens, Pacific Rim can be seen as a celebration of community, a call to recognize that our connections to others are what empower us to overcome our greatest challenges.

Embracing the Unknown: A Journey of Self-Discovery

At its core, Pacific Rim is a journey of self-discovery, where characters confront their fears, form deep connections, and rise above their limitations. In Kim’s view, this journey is universal. We are all on our own paths of growth, facing our own Kaiju and building our own Jaegers. The film’s message is clear: it is through resilience, connection, and courage that we find our true strength.

In the voice of Eric Kim, Pacific Rim is more than an action-packed spectacle; it is a narrative about embracing life’s challenges, cultivating meaningful relationships, and drawing upon our inner strength. The Kaiju, the Drift, and the Jaegers are not just elements of a science fiction world—they are symbols of the human journey. By facing our fears, connecting with others, and persevering through adversity, we, too, can emerge victorious, armed with the wisdom and strength to face whatever comes next.

Through the lens of Eric Kim:

Pacific Rim speaks to the resilience of humanity, where each Jaeger represents a symbol of courage in the face of overwhelming odds. The film reflects the idea that we are all capable of incredible strength when united by a purpose. For Kim, this film might symbolize an introspective journey—a way to embrace one’s own monsters. He often discusses the concept of inner resilience and becoming one’s own hero. In Pacific Rim, humanity is forced to confront its greatest fears by building Jaegers, monstrous creations that act as a mirror to the Kaiju. This clash represents the continuous human endeavor to conquer obstacles by manifesting our inner strength outwardly.

Kim might interpret the Drift, the shared consciousness of Jaeger pilots, as an embodiment of collective consciousness and the power of human connection. It’s not just about physical strength, but about the synergy created when two minds harmonize with one goal. This reinforces his belief in collaborative creation, a philosophy that posits the best achievements come from shared experiences and unity.

In the voice of Friedrich Nietzsche:

Pacific Rim could be seen as a cinematic testament to Nietzsche’s concept of the Übermensch, or “Overman”—an idealized human who overcomes societal limitations and embodies self-creation. The Jaegers themselves are a manifestation of humanity’s attempt to surpass its natural limitations, to become god-like in strength and purpose. Each Jaeger stands tall, a symbol of humanity’s will to power. In battling the Kaiju, humanity is in a constant struggle for survival, which Nietzsche might interpret as the eternal recurrence of conflict that spurs humanity to evolve.

The concept of the Drift, the mental link required to operate a Jaeger, aligns with Nietzsche’s idea of amor fati, or “love of fate.” Pilots must not only accept each other’s flaws and traumas but merge them into a harmonious whole, embracing the totality of each other’s experiences as their own. Nietzsche might see this as a metaphor for embracing one’s destiny fully, as a path to achieving greatness. To him, the Drift represents the ultimate acceptance of self and other—a surrender that paradoxically grants strength and control.

Further, Pacific Rim envisions a world where humanity must band together, casting aside individual differences for a collective purpose. This could be seen as a challenge to Nietzsche’s emphasis on individualism, but it also reflects his idea of overcoming: in unity, humanity overcomes not just physical threats but its own limitations. Through the film, we witness a Nietzschean journey of humanity striving to transcend itself, channeling both destruction and creation in the process of survival.

In Summary

Both Eric Kim and Nietzsche would view Pacific Rim as a story of human potential, but from different angles. Kim might focus on the collaborative aspect of human achievement and the personal journey of resilience, while Nietzsche would likely interpret the Jaegers and Kaiju as symbols of the struggle for dominance, self-overcoming, and the relentless will to power. Together, they would see the film as an illustration of how humanity continuously rises to meet existential threats—not just through brute force, but through unity, shared consciousness, and a fierce embrace of its own nature.

jager, jaeger— hunter.

…

The term “Jaeger” in Pacific Rim comes from the German word “Jäger”, which translates to “hunter” in English. This term reflects the purpose of these giant robots in the movie: they are designed to hunt and fight the Kaiju, massive alien creatures that threaten humanity.

Etymology and Usage

• Jäger in German originates from the verb “jagen,” meaning “to hunt.” Historically, it was used to refer to hunters or soldiers with specialized roles, such as riflemen or light infantry, who were skilled in tracking and engaging in combat.

• In Pacific Rim, the Jaegers are given this name to symbolize their role as humanity’s ultimate weapons, created to track down and combat the Kaiju. The use of this German word also adds a militaristic, authoritative tone, reinforcing the robots’ roles as defenders in the ongoing battle against monstrous threats  .

The choice of “Jaeger” aligns with director Guillermo del Toro’s broader stylistic decisions, where he incorporated names and concepts that evoke power and military strength. The term is part of the movie’s blend of different languages and cultural elements, giving it a global appeal and emphasizing the theme of international unity against a common enemy.

….

Here are some memorable quotes from Pacific Rim that encapsulate the film’s themes of resilience, unity, and human spirit:

1. “We are canceling the apocalypse!” – Stacker Pentecost (Idris Elba)

This line, delivered by Pentecost, embodies the film’s theme of human defiance in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds. It’s a rallying cry for the Jaeger pilots as they prepare for the final battle against the Kaiju, signifying humanity’s refusal to surrender  .

2. “The Drift… it’s a dance. It requires two minds, our memories, our pain, our truths.” – Raleigh Becket (Charlie Hunnam)

This quote highlights the movie’s concept of the Drift, a neural connection between Jaeger pilots. It emphasizes the necessity of trust and vulnerability, as two people must share their emotions and experiences to pilot together effectively. This theme reinforces the film’s message about the importance of human connection and unity in achieving greatness .

3. “Numbers are as close as we get to the handwriting of God.” – Dr. Hermann Gottlieb (Burn Gorman)

Gottlieb, one of the scientists studying the Kaiju, uses this line to express his faith in the power of scientific understanding. The character contrasts his analytical perspective with his partner’s intuitive approach, illustrating the movie’s balance between rationality and intuition .

4. “To fight monsters, we created monsters of our own.” – Opening narration

This line sets the stage for the entire movie, introducing the concept of Jaegers as humanity’s last line of defense. It suggests the moral complexity of fighting violence with violence, hinting at a broader commentary on human resilience and the potential consequences of technological advancement .

5. “There are things you can’t fight—acts of God. You see a hurricane coming, you have to get out of the way. But when you’re in a Jaeger, you can finally fight the hurricane. You can win.” – Raleigh Becket

This quote captures the essence of what Jaegers represent: the ability to confront nature’s most terrifying forces. It reflects the empowerment the Jaeger program offers to pilots, giving them a way to stand against seemingly unstoppable forces .

These quotes from Pacific Rim reflect the film’s underlying message about overcoming adversity through cooperation, resilience, and shared strength. The lines emphasize themes that are central to the movie, portraying the Jaeger pilots’ determination to defend humanity against a common threat and highlighting the film’s celebration of human ingenuity and courage.

….

The Pacific Rim film series was funded and produced by Legendary Pictures with distribution by Warner Bros. Pictures for the first film, Pacific Rim (2013). Directed by Guillermo del Toro, this movie was co-produced by Thomas Tull, Jon Jashni, del Toro, and Mary Parent, with Legendary taking the lead in production and Warner Bros. handling the distribution worldwide. The film’s success at the global box office, especially in markets like China, helped establish it as a notable entry in the science fiction and monster movie genre.

For the sequel, Pacific Rim: Uprising (2018), Legendary Pictures continued its role in production, but this time with distribution by Universal Pictures, following the end of Legendary’s partnership with Warner Bros. The second film was directed by Steven S. DeKnight and produced by Cale Boyter, John Boyega (who also starred in the film), and Femi Oguns. The production of Uprising included Universal as the distributor, marking a shift in the series’ partnership landscape following the acquisition of Legendary by the Chinese conglomerate Wanda Group in 2016. This partnership likely influenced the sequel’s focus on appealing to a broader international audience, particularly in Asia.

These collaborations helped create the distinctive style and large-scale action that the Pacific Rim films are known for, combining Hollywood and international influences to capture the “giant robot vs. monster” theme on a grand cinematic scale.

Sources:

• Legendary and Warner Bros. involvement in Pacific Rim (2013): Wikipedia, Legendary.

• Universal Pictures’ distribution for Pacific Rim: Uprising (2018): Wikipedia, Legendary.

…

The Pacific Rim films, directed by Guillermo del Toro for the first film (2013) and Steven S. DeKnight for the sequel Pacific Rim: Uprising (2018), were produced by Legendary Pictures. The first film was distributed by Warner Bros., while Universal Pictures took on distribution for the second movie after Legendary partnered with the Chinese company Wanda Group. The series was created with a focus on delivering large-scale action through the clash of giant robots (Jaegers) and monsters (Kaiju), drawing heavy inspiration from Japanese kaiju films and mecha anime  .

Production and Philosophical Themes

Guillermo del Toro approached Pacific Rim with a unique vision, blending the spectacle of monster movies with deeper humanist themes. He emphasized creating a “humanist blockbuster” by using the movie’s sci-fi elements to explore ideas of connection, empathy, and global unity. One of the film’s central concepts is the “Drift”, a neural bridge required to pilot the Jaegers, which requires two individuals to sync their minds, embodying themes of cooperation and shared humanity. This concept allowed del Toro to explore relationships and teamwork, making the Kaiju-Jaeger battles symbolic of personal and cultural connections  .

Furthermore, Pacific Rim aimed to contrast the pessimistic outlook typical of many dystopian films by showing a world where nations set aside their differences to face a common enemy. Del Toro depicted the Kaiju as a reflection of humanity’s own environmental impact, framing the monsters as a direct consequence of human negligence. This connection emphasized the message that humanity must unite to combat both external and internal threats, with the Kaiju symbolizing the destructive potential of unchecked ecological harm .

Visual and Cinematic Impact

The production involved extensive visual effects work to bring the massive Jaegers and Kaiju to life, making each battle feel grounded and impactful. Del Toro insisted on a weighty, realistic feel to the Jaegers’ movements, capturing the strain and physicality of piloting these towering machines, unlike other CGI-heavy films where actions may feel floaty or unreal. This emphasis on visual heft contributed to the immersive spectacle of Pacific Rim, setting it apart from other sci-fi action films and reinforcing the intensity of each battle scene  .

The film’s mixture of globalized settings, diverse characters, and emphasis on cooperation resonated with international audiences, making Pacific Rim a distinct entry in the science fiction genre that combined epic action with a call for unity and shared responsibility in the face of global challenges.

The true scholar — we know that things are 1 trillion times more complex, it is more like non-linear, complex calculus, rather than simple scalar or vector equations?

Everything is contradictory?

Yes, it can seem contradictory. Richard Henry Pratt is credited with one of the first recorded uses of the term “racism” in 1902. He spoke of “destroying racism” as he advocated for the integration of Native Americans into American society through assimilation. While Pratt’s use of “racism” indicated his opposition to strict racial segregation, his methods and beliefs have since been widely criticized as culturally destructive and inherently racist  .

Pratt’s ideology was shaped by the prevailing beliefs of his time. He considered Native American cultures to be “savage” and inferior, so he sought to forcibly “civilize” Native youth by erasing their cultural identities—a perspective rooted in cultural superiority and ethnocentrism. His statement, “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man,” is now seen as a form of cultural genocide, reflecting a paternalistic view that indigenous cultures needed to be obliterated for their members to be “saved” or “improved.” This philosophy was inherently racist because it imposed a belief in the superiority of Euro-American culture over indigenous traditions  .

In summary, while Pratt used the term “racism” to speak against racial exclusion, his own views on cultural assimilation were deeply problematic. His actions and policies reflected a type of racism that sought to eradicate Native American cultural identity and force conformity to Euro-American norms. His legacy highlights the complexities and contradictions in early 20th-century attitudes toward race and assimilation.

Richard Henry Pratt’s statement, “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man,” reflects his belief that Native American cultural identity was incompatible with American societal success. Pratt, who founded the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in 1879, was motivated by the idea that Native Americans needed to abandon their traditional customs and adopt Euro-American culture to survive and prosper. His approach was based on several key motivations:

1. Assimilationist Belief

Pratt viewed assimilation as the only path for Native Americans to succeed within American society. He believed that by erasing indigenous cultural practices, languages, and traditions, Native Americans could integrate as “civilized” members of the nation. His philosophy stemmed from the prevalent 19th-century view that Euro-American culture was superior and that indigenous cultures were “savage” and outdated. He once likened his assimilation approach to a form of religious conversion, saying, “I am a Baptist because I believe in immersing the Indians in our civilization and holding them there until they are thoroughly soaked.” This reveals his perception that cultural transformation could only be achieved through total immersion in Euro-American ways  .

2. Civilizing Mission

Like many of his contemporaries, Pratt saw his work as part of a broader “civilizing mission”—the idea that it was the duty of Euro-Americans to “uplift” and “civilize” other cultures. He believed that forcing Native Americans to adopt Western cultural practices would ultimately benefit them. This paternalistic view was common among officials at the time, who felt justified in using coercive measures to achieve these goals. For example, at Carlisle, students were prohibited from speaking their native languages, had their hair cut, and were given English names, all with the intent of making them conform to Euro-American societal norms  .

3. Military Influence

Pratt’s military background also influenced his philosophy. He had served in the U.S. Army during the Indian Wars, which contributed to his perception of Native Americans through the lens of control and discipline. His experience supervising Native prisoners at Fort Marion in Florida led him to believe that removing Native Americans from their environments and subjecting them to structured, regimented systems would “reform” them. He modeled the Carlisle school after military training, emphasizing order, discipline, and uniformity as tools to erase Native identities and replace them with Euro-American ideals  .

4. Social Darwinism and Racial Views

Pratt’s views were also shaped by the racial ideologies of his time, which often included elements of Social Darwinism. Although Pratt was opposed to explicit segregation and believed in the possibility of racial improvement through assimilation, he viewed Native American culture as an obstacle that needed to be overcome. His approach reflected a belief in the superiority of Western civilization, a view that justified coercive assimilation as a “necessary” means to bring Native Americans into the modern world. This philosophy was intertwined with racial prejudices that deemed indigenous cultures as primitive or inferior  .

5. Economic and Political Motives

Additionally, the U.S. government and society saw Native American assimilation as a way to facilitate access to tribal lands and resources. By promoting assimilation, policymakers hoped to eliminate the need for reservations and reduce the government’s obligations to Native tribes. Assimilationist education was therefore not only a social mission but also a strategy to weaken tribal cohesion and encourage Native Americans to adopt individual land ownership through policies like the Dawes Act. Pratt’s advocacy for assimilation fit within this larger framework of policies that sought to dissolve Native American identities and integrate them into the American economic system  .

Pratt’s statement, and his work more broadly, reflect a deeply flawed but historically common belief that indigenous cultures had to be erased in order for Native Americans to succeed. Today, this approach is widely criticized as a form of cultural genocide, as it aimed to strip away Native American identities and heritage in favor of forced assimilation into mainstream American society.

Richard Henry Pratt (1840–1924) was an American military officer best known for founding the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in 1879, the first federally funded off-reservation boarding school for Native American children. His controversial philosophy of assimilation and education for Native Americans is often encapsulated by his quote, “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man.” Pratt believed that Native Americans could only thrive if they abandoned their cultural identities and adopted Euro-American values, language, and way of life  .

Early Life and Military Career

Pratt’s ideas on assimilation developed during his time as a soldier. In the Civil War, he served with the 10th Cavalry, a regiment of Black soldiers. Later, in the 1870s, he was stationed at Fort Marion in Florida, where he was assigned to supervise a group of Native American prisoners. During this time, he initiated a program that exposed prisoners to English and Euro-American customs. This experience shaped his view that assimilation could be achieved by isolating Native Americans from their tribal environments  .

Ideology and Educational Approach

Pratt’s ideology was rooted in the belief that Native Americans could only succeed by fully integrating into American society. He advocated for the complete cultural assimilation of Native American youth through education, vocational training, and strict discipline, often modeled after military training. His approach emphasized:

• Isolation: Pratt believed that separating Native American children from their families and tribes was essential. By distancing them from their cultural roots, he aimed to reduce their attachment to traditional Native customs and promote “civilized” behaviors.

• Cultural Erasure: At Carlisle, students were given English names, required to speak English, and prohibited from practicing their traditional customs. The school forced students to adopt Euro-American clothing, hairstyles, and mannerisms.

• “Immersive Assimilation”: Pratt compared his assimilation philosophy to religious baptism. He once stated, “In Indian civilization I am a Baptist, because I believe in immersing the Indians in our civilization and holding them there until they are thoroughly soaked.” This metaphor reflects his view that assimilation required a deep, transformative immersion in American culture  .

Notable Quotes and Their Implications

1. “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man.”

This phrase became symbolic of the cultural genocide policies of Native American boarding schools. Pratt argued that Native Americans must shed their cultural identities to become “civilized,” reflecting a belief that indigenous cultures were inferior and needed to be replaced by Euro-American values .

2. “Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism.”

Pratt used this phrase to advocate for racial integration, albeit on the terms of assimilation. While he opposed racial separation, he sought to eliminate indigenous cultures rather than promoting coexistence and mutual respect  .

3. “It is better to be divided by truth than to be united in error.”

Pratt’s statement here suggests his belief in the supremacy of Euro-American culture and the perceived moral duty to “uplift” Native Americans. He saw this as a mission grounded in righteousness, despite the harm his policies inflicted .

Legacy and Criticism

Pratt’s practices and the boarding school model he helped pioneer are now widely regarded as tools of cultural genocide. The Carlisle Indian Industrial School, along with other boarding schools, inflicted lasting trauma on Native American communities. Forced assimilation led to a loss of language, cultural practices, and family connections, effects that continue to impact indigenous communities today. While Pratt saw himself as a reformer, his methods contributed to systemic oppression and a legacy of cultural erasure that is increasingly acknowledged as a dark chapter in U.S. history  .

Today, his work is studied as part of the broader history of American Indian boarding schools, which sought to “Americanize” Native youth at great cultural and psychological cost. His ideology and methods are now viewed critically as emblematic of the paternalistic attitudes that justified forced assimilation policies, leaving a complicated and painful legacy.

xxx

Richard Henry Pratt is perhaps most famously known for his phrase, “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man,” which he used to encapsulate his philosophy on assimilating Native Americans into mainstream American culture. He articulated this idea during an 1892 speech at the National Conference of Charities and Correction. Pratt, who founded the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Pennsylvania, believed that by immersing Native American youth in European-American customs, they could be “civilized” and brought into American society. His approach involved removing Native children from their cultural environments and forbidding them from speaking their languages or practicing their customs, aiming to replace their indigenous identities with Euro-American values and lifestyles.

Pratt’s broader philosophy extended to his belief that associations between different races and classes were necessary to dismantle what he termed “racism and classism.” Although this might suggest an anti-racist stance, Pratt’s methods were highly controversial and are now considered acts of cultural genocide, as they sought to erase Native American cultural identity rather than integrate diverse groups on equal terms. His practices at Carlisle, including renaming children, enforcing English language use, and subjecting them to military-style discipline, have left a lasting impact on Native communities, many of whom regard these boarding schools as deeply traumatic institutions.

Pratt’s views and actions reflect the broader 19th-century attitudes toward race and assimilation, but they also mark an early recorded use of the concept of “racism” in English, as he aimed to reshape Native Americans through forced cultural assimilation rather than promoting genuine respect for their heritage. Today, his legacy is a subject of significant reflection and criticism, as his philosophy is recognized as part of the systemic efforts to suppress Native American cultures in the United States.

The term “racist” was first used in English in the early 20th century, though pinpointing the exact first user is challenging. However, it is commonly accepted that the term “racism” appeared first, around 1902, in a statement by Richard Henry Pratt. Pratt, known for his work with the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, used it when discussing the need to eliminate racial divisions by advocating for racial integration: he reportedly stated, “Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism”  .

The Oxford English Dictionary suggests the term “racist” emerged shortly after “racism,” by 1907, as it quickly became a noun to describe individuals who subscribed to racist beliefs. The term gained wider attention and usage in the 1930s as it became associated with ideologies that promoted racial superiority, especially during the rise of the Nazi Party and its racial doctrines  .

Therefore, while Richard Henry Pratt is often cited as one of the first known users of “racism,” the term “racist” developed soon after as a natural extension to describe adherents of such beliefs.

The term “racism” is documented as first being used in 1902 by Richard Henry Pratt, an American military officer and founder of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School. Pratt used the term in the context of advocating against racial segregation, stating, “Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism.” This reflects Pratt’s belief that racial integration was essential to counteract social divisions, though his own practices at the school, which aimed to assimilate Native American children into European-American culture, were controversial and paternalistic.

The following year, 1903, the term appeared again in an official context at the Lake Mohonk Conference, an annual meeting focused on Native American and African American issues, further solidifying the term’s early usage in discussions about racial relations and policies in the United States. These early uses of “racism” were less about individual prejudice and more about systemic practices of discrimination based on race.

As the 20th century progressed, “racism” became associated with ideologies that promote racial hierarchies, especially during the 1930s when it was used to describe the policies of Nazi Germany. By the end of World War II, the term had broadened to describe not just explicit doctrines of racial superiority but also institutionalized systems of discrimination and segregation that persisted in various parts of the world, especially in the United States and Europe.

This early etymology reflects how the term evolved from describing segregationist practices to a concept that encompasses both individual biases and broader structural inequalities. The understanding of racism has continued to develop, now including aspects such as systemic and institutional racism, which examine how historical and social structures contribute to ongoing racial disparities.

1903

The term “racism” emerged in the early 20th century, first appearing around 1903. It originated in the context of prevailing racial theories, which were widely accepted at the time. These theories posited that human beings could be categorized into distinct races with inherent differences in character, intelligence, and behavior. This classification system was used to rationalize unequal treatment based on race, providing a framework for imperialism, colonialism, and the widespread belief in the superiority of certain racial groups, particularly those of European descent  .

Evolution and Expansion of the Term

1. Early 1900s: Initially, “racism” was closely linked to scientific racism, which sought to justify the classification of humans into hierarchical races. This era also saw the rise of social Darwinism, where some racial groups were considered more “fit” than others. Concepts of racial superiority were not limited to individuals but extended to entire systems, justifying discriminatory laws and policies across Europe and the Americas.

2. 1930s: The term “racism” gained broader attention as it became associated with Nazi ideology and the systematic oppression of Jews, Slavs, and other groups deemed “inferior.” The Nazis promoted an extreme form of racism that included racial purity laws and eugenics programs, which led to the atrocities of the Holocaust. By this time, the term began to encompass not only the beliefs about racial superiority but also actions and policies that stemmed from those beliefs .

3. Post-World War II: After the war, “racism” became a widely recognized term to describe ideologies and practices that perpetuate discrimination. This period saw an expansion in its meaning as social scientists and civil rights activists began to analyze how institutionalized racism functioned in various societal structures, including education, housing, and employment. The term also began to reflect the systemic nature of racial discrimination and not just individual prejudices .

4. 1960s and Civil Rights Era: The civil rights movements in the United States and other parts of the world further solidified “racism” as a term used to describe both personal biases and the structural inequalities maintained by discriminatory policies. Scholars like W.E.B. Du Bois and Martin Luther King Jr. contributed to a broader understanding of racism as something ingrained in society’s institutions and practices.

5. Modern Usage: Today, “racism” is used to refer to a range of discriminatory practices and beliefs, from overtly racist attitudes to subtler forms of systemic racism. Terms like “institutional racism” and “structural racism” reflect the understanding that racism is often embedded in social and political systems, perpetuating inequality even without explicit prejudice from individuals. This broader definition includes the ways in which racial biases can impact outcomes in criminal justice, healthcare, housing, and more  .

In recent decades, there has also been a focus on anti-racism, which involves actively working to dismantle these systems of discrimination. This contemporary understanding of racism considers not only individual attitudes but also how societal structures and policies contribute to racial disparities, highlighting the need for systemic change.

….

Yes, the term “racism” is documented as having first appeared in 1903. Its initial uses were closely tied to the scientific and social discussions of the era that classified humans into racial categories based on perceived biological and cultural differences. At this time, racial theories were frequently used to justify imperialism, colonialism, and discrimination.

The term “racism” became more prominent in the 1930s, especially as it described the racial ideologies associated with Nazism and similar supremacist doctrines. By the end of World War II, “racism” had evolved to broadly encompass beliefs and systems that discriminate based on race, a definition that has since expanded to address both individual and institutional discrimination  .

….

The word “racism” first appeared in English in the early 20th century, with recorded uses around 1903. This term originated as a way to describe the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics that justify treating them unequally. Its shortened form, “racialism,” was used in English slightly earlier, in 1902, to denote similar ideas about racial superiority  .

The term gained significant traction in the 1930s when it was used more widely to describe the discriminatory ideologies and practices associated with Nazi Germany. By the end of World War II, “racism” had become widely recognized in the Western world to describe not only individual prejudice but also broader systems of racial oppression and discrimination  .

xxx

Here’s a timeline of the history of the term “racist” and its related concepts:

Pre-1900s: Roots of Racial Classification

• 1600s-1700s: European colonization promotes the concept of race, used to justify the subjugation and enslavement of non-European peoples. Race is increasingly perceived as a biological determinant of human abilities and traits.

• 1779: German anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach categorizes humans into five racial groups based on physical characteristics, influencing future racial classifications.

1800s: Emergence of Scientific Racism

• 1830s-1850s: Scientific racism grows in popularity, with theories suggesting a hierarchy of races. European scientists and intellectuals promote these ideas, using pseudoscientific claims to argue for white superiority.

• 1853-1855: Joseph Arthur de Gobineau’s Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races asserts that civilizations decline due to racial mixing, fueling racist ideology.

Early 1900s: Development of “Racialism” and “Racism”

• 1902: The term “racialism” appears in English, used to denote the belief in racial superiority and the necessity of racial separation .

• 1903: The term “racism” is first recorded, likely as a shortened form of racialism  .

1930s: Popularization of the Term “Racism”

• 1930s: As the Nazi Party rises in Germany, the term “racism” gains widespread usage to describe ideologies like Nazism that espouse racial superiority. It becomes associated with totalitarian regimes that enforce discriminatory practices based on race .

Post-World War II: Expansion of “Racism” as a Social Concept

• 1940s-1950s: Following World War II, “racism” is used to denounce the doctrines of the Axis powers. The term grows in usage globally as awareness of racial prejudice and discrimination increases, especially during the Civil Rights Movement in the United States.

• 1950: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) publishes statements refuting the biological basis of race, helping shift scientific consensus against racial classification and scientific racism .

1960s-1980s: Racism and Civil Rights

• 1960s: The term “racism” becomes central in civil rights discourse, especially in the United States, where it is used to address systemic discrimination against African Americans and other minorities.

• 1970s: Sociologists expand the definition of racism to include institutional racism, which examines how societal structures perpetuate racial inequality beyond individual prejudice .

1990s-Present: Modern Understanding of Racism

• 1990s-2000s: Racism is increasingly understood as a systemic issue encompassing social, economic, and political dimensions. Scholars examine intersectionality, which considers how race intersects with other identities, like gender and class.

• Present: Racism continues to be a widely discussed issue globally, with movements like Black Lives Matter bringing attention to police brutality and systemic racism. Terms like “anti-racism” and “structural racism” reflect a growing understanding of racism as embedded in societal institutions and norms .

Throughout its history, the term “racist” has evolved from describing individual prejudice to encompassing broader societal systems that sustain racial inequality. This expanded definition helps in understanding and addressing the complex, institutionalized nature of racism today.

cxxx

Here’s a timeline of the history of the term “racist” and its related concepts:

Pre-1900s: Roots of Racial Classification

• 1600s-1700s: European colonization promotes the concept of race, used to justify the subjugation and enslavement of non-European peoples. Race is increasingly perceived as a biological determinant of human abilities and traits.

• 1779: German anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach categorizes humans into five racial groups based on physical characteristics, influencing future racial classifications.

1800s: Emergence of Scientific Racism

• 1830s-1850s: Scientific racism grows in popularity, with theories suggesting a hierarchy of races. European scientists and intellectuals promote these ideas, using pseudoscientific claims to argue for white superiority.

• 1853-1855: Joseph Arthur de Gobineau’s Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races asserts that civilizations decline due to racial mixing, fueling racist ideology.

Early 1900s: Development of “Racialism” and “Racism”

• 1902: The term “racialism” appears in English, used to denote the belief in racial superiority and the necessity of racial separation .

• 1903: The term “racism” is first recorded, likely as a shortened form of racialism  .

1930s: Popularization of the Term “Racism”

• 1930s: As the Nazi Party rises in Germany, the term “racism” gains widespread usage to describe ideologies like Nazism that espouse racial superiority. It becomes associated with totalitarian regimes that enforce discriminatory practices based on race .

Post-World War II: Expansion of “Racism” as a Social Concept

• 1940s-1950s: Following World War II, “racism” is used to denounce the doctrines of the Axis powers. The term grows in usage globally as awareness of racial prejudice and discrimination increases, especially during the Civil Rights Movement in the United States.

• 1950: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) publishes statements refuting the biological basis of race, helping shift scientific consensus against racial classification and scientific racism .

1960s-1980s: Racism and Civil Rights

• 1960s: The term “racism” becomes central in civil rights discourse, especially in the United States, where it is used to address systemic discrimination against African Americans and other minorities.

• 1970s: Sociologists expand the definition of racism to include institutional racism, which examines how societal structures perpetuate racial inequality beyond individual prejudice .

1990s-Present: Modern Understanding of Racism

• 1990s-2000s: Racism is increasingly understood as a systemic issue encompassing social, economic, and political dimensions. Scholars examine intersectionality, which considers how race intersects with other identities, like gender and class.

• Present: Racism continues to be a widely discussed issue globally, with movements like Black Lives Matter bringing attention to police brutality and systemic racism. Terms like “anti-racism” and “structural racism” reflect a growing understanding of racism as embedded in societal institutions and norms .

Throughout its history, the term “racist” has evolved from describing individual prejudice to encompassing broader societal systems that sustain racial inequality. This expanded definition helps in understanding and addressing the complex, institutionalized nature of racism today.

xxx

The term “racist” is relatively modern, arising in the early 20th century. It is derived from the word “race”, which has its own complex history rooted in Middle French. The suffix “-ist” denotes a person who subscribes to a particular doctrine or belief. “Racist” was first documented in English in the early 1930s, though related terms like “racialism” appeared earlier, with “racialism” first recorded in 1902. Over time, “racism” largely supplanted “racialism” in common use, especially by the 1930s, when the term “racism” became associated with ideologies like Nazism, which promoted racial hierarchies and supremacist beliefs.

The concept of racial superiority and its pseudoscientific justifications emerged in the 19th century, especially among European intellectuals. This period saw the rise of scientific racism, which sought to classify humans into distinct racial categories based on perceived biological differences. By the 1920s and 1930s, the term “racism” came to signify ideologies that justified discrimination based on these classifications.

Throughout the 20th century, as awareness of racial prejudice grew, “racism” became widely used to describe systems and beliefs that maintain racial inequality, particularly following World War II, when the term was associated with the extreme ideologies and atrocities committed under Nazi Germany. Since then, “racism” has expanded to encompass broader societal structures and institutional practices that uphold racial disparities, especially in contexts like the United States and Western Europe.

Today, the term “racist” not only refers to individuals who hold prejudiced beliefs about race but also to systems and policies that perpetuate racial inequality, reflecting a more comprehensive understanding of how racial discrimination operates within society.

Sources: Wikipedia, Etymonline, WNYC, and the Holocaust Encyclopedia.

”Nailed to the door of an antisemite—“- Nietzsche