AUDIO

For the near years; figure out what to get rid of, WHAT *NOT* to do, what *NOT* to eat etc.

For example … I see a BUNCH of people trading in their Tesla model 3’s, model 3 performance all black everything … even Tesla Model S, Tesla Model S Plaid all black everything … at a TOYOTA dealership???

Not “quality”… but how it was *designed*— the architect and visionary behind the product.

For example most things are all made in China … even the good stuff (Apple, iPhone, iPhone Pro, MacBook Pro, iPad Pro etc)— the difference is how thoughtfully and intuitively it was designed.

For example this fucking random beach tent “shelter” popup thing … how is it that when I try to fold it up to put it back into the little tiny bag I need a fucking Ph.D in rocket science to figure this out???

I hate accumulating shit!

*ful– — foul, dirty.

For example just look at their homes, their kitchens, their cars…. inside and out.

Also their bodies, their clothes, their mind.

My passion is to delete — often to a fault. But better to delete and subtract and become minimalist to a fault than to add “necessary” things to a fault?

Great design is all about getting *RID* of shit, not “adding” more things!

VLOG ALL

NEW YEAR NEW YOU

New year new you.

Podcast

AUDIO

EL-X model… anywhere and everywhere!

For example … I think everyone should have a pair of Vibram 5 finger shoes or even the INJIJI toe socks!

Toes, feet… are essentially hands on the other side of the floor.

We hate sending text messages or using gloves when on a phone … we prefer bare hands and fingers.

Why not the same with toes and feet?

HONOS… CICERO?

The term “honor,” steeped in a rich linguistic history, offers a fascinating journey through its etymology. Its roots can be traced back to the Latin word “honos” or “honor,” which held meanings akin to esteem, dignity, and respect. This Latin term itself is likely derived from an earlier Proto-Indo-European root, hinting at an even more ancient lineage.

When we delve into the philosophical dimensions of “honor,” its etymology becomes even more intriguing. Throughout history, the concept of honor has been closely linked with notions of morality, social standing, and personal integrity. In many cultures, honor was not just a personal virtue but a complex social mechanism, governing interactions and shaping societal structures.

In modern times, while the social mechanisms may have evolved, the essence of honor as a blend of respect, dignity, and ethical conduct remains vital. It resonates with your interest in philosophy and thinking, reflecting the perennial human quest to balance personal values with societal expectations. The evolution of the word “honor” mirrors the evolution of the concept itself, adapting and transforming yet retaining its core significance.

In the context of innovation and entrepreneurship, honor can be seen as a guiding principle, emphasizing integrity, respect, and ethical practices in the pursuit of new ideas and ventures. It suggests a way of engaging with the world that combines ambition with a moral compass, a balance that is both challenging and rewarding.

Only founders are interesting … *NOT* companies.

Elon Musk vision and CYBERTRUCK— even Cindy’s dad preordered one, for ~$85,000??? Mid range.

Achilles has a son???

Baby momma is Deidamia

Woo the ladies with the harp!

again he shows her the sweet strings of the lyre he knows so well, and the gentle measures and songs of Chiron’s teaching, and guides her hand and makes her fingers strike the sounding harp, now as she sings he makes a conquest of her lips, and binds her in his embrace, and praises her amid a thousand kisses. With pleasure does she learn of Pelion’s summit and of Aeacides, and hearing the name and exploits of the youth is spellbound in constant wonder, and sings of Achilles in his very presence.

A thousand kisses!!

In Statius’ “Achilleid,” the relationship between Achilles and Deidamia, and the birth of their son Neoptolemus, are depicted with dramatic intricacy. Deidamia, aware of Achilles’ true identity, becomes enchanted by him. Achilles, amidst the maidens and no longer restrained by his mother’s presence, begins to woo Deidamia with various gestures, like playing the lyre and sharing songs taught by his centaur teacher, Chiron oai_citation:1,STATIUS, ACHILLEID BOOKS 1-2 – Theoi Classical Texts Library. Eventually, under the cover of night, Achilles consummates his relationship with Deidamia forcefully, a scene witnessed by the stars and the moon oai_citation:2,STATIUS, ACHILLEID BOOKS 1-2 – Theoi Classical Texts Library. Deidamia, shocked by these events and yet still in love with Achilles, chooses to conceal the occurrence and her subsequent pregnancy, eventually giving birth to their son oai_citation:3,STATIUS, ACHILLEID BOOKS 1-2 – Theoi Classical Texts Library.

This narrative from “Achilleid” provides a poetic and mythical account of the circumstances leading to the birth of Neoptolemus, Achilles’ son, highlighting the complex interplay of love, deception, and destiny in Greek mythology.

The story of Achilles and Deidamia, and the birth of their son Neoptolemus, is not part of Homer’s “Iliad” or “Odyssey.” It comes from later Greek and Roman mythology and literature. As such, there isn’t a direct quote from these primary epic poems about their relationship or the birth of Neoptolemus.

The tale is explored in other sources and later mythological texts. For example, the Roman poet Statius in the 1st century AD writes about this episode in his epic, “Achilleid.” However, since “Achilleid” is a Latin epic and not as widely read as Homer’s works, direct quotations are less commonly known.

In the broader tradition of Greek mythology, the story of Achilles at Scyros and his relationship with Deidamia is primarily known through summaries and references in later texts rather than through a single, definitive narrative source. This reflects the nature of ancient mythological storytelling, where multiple versions and variations of a story often coexisted.

Who was mom of son of Achilles

The mother of Neoptolemus, the son of Achilles, was Deidamia. According to Greek mythology, Achilles was hidden by his mother, Thetis, at the court of King Lycomedes on the island of Scyros. This was done to prevent him from joining the Trojan War, as it was prophesied that he would die there.

While living in disguise as a woman among King Lycomedes’ daughters, Achilles had a secret affair with Deidamia, one of the king’s daughters. From this union, Neoptolemus (also known as Pyrrhus) was born. The story of Achilles at Scyros and his relationship with Deidamia is a less famous part of the Trojan War saga but adds depth to the story of Achilles and his lineage.

Tragedy

she
begged her master leave to bury this poor dead child of Hector [1135] who breathed
out his [psūkhē] when hurled from the turrets; entreating too that he would not
carry this shield, the terror of the Achaeans—this shield with plates of brass with
which his father would gird himself—to the home of Peleus or to the same bridal
bower where she, Andromache, [1140] the mother of this corpse, would be wed, a
bitter sight to her, but let her bury the child in it instead of in a coffin of cedar or a
tomb of stone, and to your hands commit the corpse that you may deck it with robes
and garlands [stephanoi] as best you can with your present means; [1145] for she is
far away and her master’s haste prevented her from making funeral rites [taphos]
the child herself. So we, when you have arranged [kosmeîn] the corpse, will heap the
earth above and set upon it a spear; but do you with your best speed perform your
allotted task; [1150] one toil however I have already spared you, for I crossed
Scamander’s stream and bathed the corpse and cleansed its wounds. But now I will
go to dig a grave [taphos] for him, that our united efforts [1155] shortening our task
may speed our ship towards home [oikos].

PDF

Thoughts and life lessons from the Iliad —

First … think the protagonists. King Agamemnon and Achilles, Hector, King Priam.

Kings are boring.

The first thought —

In the story, nobody wants to be King Agamemnon *nor* King Priam.

They are old, worn and torn, no prowess in battle.

Achilles has a son?

Death of son of Hector

Euripides in tragedy “The Trojan Women”—

The specific event of Astyanax’s death is not detailed in Homer’s “Iliad,” as it focuses on the period of the Trojan War itself. The death of Astyanax is recounted in later works and post-Homeric traditions. Euripides, in his tragedy “The Trojan Women,” portrays this event, and it is also described in other ancient texts and mythological accounts.

In “The Trojan Women,” the following lines reflect the decision to kill Astyanax:

“Talthybius:
The council of the Greeks has just decreed
That thy child must die; he must be hurled from the battlements.”

This quote is part of a dialogue in the play, where the Greek messenger Talthybius delivers the dreadful news to Hector’s wife, Andromache. The decision is presented as a cold and calculated measure by the Greeks to prevent any future threat from Hector’s lineage. The tragedy of the moment is heightened by the innocence of Astyanax and the grief of his mother, Andromache.

Astyanax, the son of Hector and Andromache in Greek mythology, met a tragic end following the fall of Troy. His death is a subject of ancient Greek literature and is most famously recounted in the works that follow the events of the Trojan War, rather than in Homer’s “Iliad” itself.

According to these stories, after the Greeks captured Troy, they decided that Astyanax posed a potential future threat. They feared that he might grow up to avenge his father, Hector, and the fallen city of Troy. To prevent this, the Greeks killed Astyanax. The manner of his death is particularly tragic and brutal: he was thrown from the walls of Troy, a deed often attributed to either Neoptolemus (the son of Achilles) or Odysseus.

This act is symbolic of the complete annihilation of Troy and its future. Astyanax, as a young, innocent child and the heir of Troy’s greatest hero, Hector, represented the hope of Troy’s resurgence. His death signifies not just the physical destruction of the city, but also the eradication of its lineage and future.

Why they have horse hair crest

The horse-hair crest on ancient Greek helmets, notably seen in depictions of warriors like Hector from Homer’s “Iliad,” served several practical and symbolic purposes:

1. Intimidation and Visibility: The crest made a warrior appear taller and more imposing, which could be intimidating to enemies. It also made commanders and notable warriors more visible on the chaotic battlefield, helping soldiers to identify and rally around their leaders.
2. Decoration and Status Symbol: The crest, often designed elaborately, was a symbol of status and valor. A high-quality, well-made crest indicated a warrior of high rank or great skill, as these were costly to produce.
3. Cultural Significance: The use of horse hair might have had cultural significance, reflecting the importance of horses in Greek society. Horses were valuable and symbolized wealth, power, and nobility. Incorporating horse hair into a helmet could have been a way to display a connection to these esteemed animals.
4. Helmet Design: Functionally, the crest could also have helped in deflecting blows to the head. Its positioning and the way it was attached could have provided a slight cushioning effect or caused weapons to slide off rather than striking directly.

In summary, the horse-hair crest was not just a decorative element but had practical uses in warfare, along with cultural and symbolic significance in ancient Greek society.

Quote of Hector son afraid of father

The quote you’re referring to is from Homer’s “Iliad,” in the scene where Hector tries to embrace his son, Astyanax, but the child is frightened by his father’s helmet and armor. Here’s a passage from this scene:

“He [Hector] spoke, and stretched his arms to his child. But the child shrank crying back to his fair-girdled nurse’s bosom, scared at his father’s aspect, and in dread of the bronze and horse-hair crest that he saw nodding terribly from the helmet’s top. His father and his honoured mother laughed aloud.”

This scene is a poignant moment in the “Iliad,” capturing the contrast between the duties of a warrior and the warmth of family life. It’s a powerful depiction of how the violence and terror of war can intrude on the innocence of childhood.

Hector and his son?

How Hector son described

Astyanax, the son of Hector and Andromache in Greek mythology, is often depicted as a young and innocent child, embodying the future and hope of Troy. In the Iliad and other classical texts, he is not described in great detail physically, but his role is significant in highlighting the human cost of the Trojan War.

The most poignant scene involving Astyanax is when Hector, before going to battle, tries to embrace his son. Astyanax, frightened by the sight of his father in armor, cries, which leads to a touching family moment as Hector removes his helmet and soothes his son. This scene poignantly contrasts the tenderness of familial love with the harsh realities of war.

Astyanax’s fate is a central element of his characterization. His death symbolizes the complete destruction of Troy and the end of Hector’s lineage, underscoring the tragedy and senselessness of war. As such, Astyanax is less characterized by individual traits and more by what he represents: the loss of future generations and the devastation of war on families and children.

Hector son

Hector, a prominent figure in Greek mythology, particularly in the story of the Trojan War as told in Homer’s “Iliad,” had a son named Astyanax. In the myth, Astyanax is a tragic figure. After the fall of Troy, there was a fear among the Greeks that he might grow up to avenge his father and his fallen city. As a result, he was thrown from the walls of Troy by either Odysseus or Neoptolemus, the son of Achilles. Astyanax’s story is a poignant symbol of the collateral damage of war, representing the loss of innocence and the future.

To me being rich is …

Rich etymology

From Middle English riche (“strong, powerful, rich”), from Old English rīċe (“powerful, mighty, great, high-ranking, rich, wealthy, strong, potent”), from Proto-West Germanic *rīkī (“powerful, rich”), from Proto-Germanic *rīkijaz (“kingly, powerful, rich”), from Proto-Germanic *rīks (“king, ruler”), an early borrowing from Proto-Celtic *rīxs, from Proto-Indo-European*h₃rḗǵs. Reinforced by Old French riche, from the same West Germanic source.

Eric Kim’s philosophical approach to life and work, especially in photography, can be described as a blend of authenticity, continual learning, and reflection on the human experience. His philosophy is not tied to traditional academic philosophy but is deeply rooted in his practical experiences and creative pursuits.

1. Authenticity and Existentialism: Kim’s lifestyle and work are guided by a pursuit of authenticity, a key aspect of existential philosophy. In his street photography, he captures raw, unfiltered moments of everyday life, reflecting deeper truths about the human experience. This approach is indicative of his commitment to existentialist values, emphasizing individual freedom and personal responsibility oai_citation:1,ERIC KIM DIGITAL NOMAD PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,ERIC KIM DIGITAL NOMAD PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM.
2. Integration of Photography and Life Principles: Kim’s philosophy integrates his passion for photography with broader life principles. He uses his art form not just for its technical aspects but also as a medium to explore and reflect on life and society. His study of masters in photography and other artistic fields has influenced his philosophical approach, combining artistic expression with deeper meanings and reflections on life oai_citation:3,How did Eric Kim become philosopher – ERIC KIM oai_citation:4,How did Eric Kim become a philosopher? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:5,How did Eric Kim become philosopher – ERIC KIM.
3. Blogging and Writing: Through his blog, Kim delves into various topics that go beyond photography techniques, discussing themes like fear, happiness, and purpose. His writings often bear a philosophical nature, reflecting on life and creativity oai_citation:6,How did Eric Kim become philosopher – ERIC KIM.
4. Continual Learning and Growth: A central element of Kim’s philosophy is the idea of lifelong learning and evolution. He views every experience, whether success or failure, as an opportunity for growth and encourages others to adopt a similar perspective oai_citation:7,ERIC KIM philosophy – ERIC KIM.
5. Digital Nomadism and Philosophical Exploration: As a digital nomad, Kim intertwines his work and lifestyle with philosophical concepts. He explores themes such as freedom, authenticity, and the human condition through his experiences as a digital nomad and street photographer. His lifestyle as a digital nomad reflects a response to globalization and cultural diversity, adding to his philosophical discourse oai_citation:8,ERIC KIM DIGITAL NOMAD PHILOSOPHY – ERIC KIM.
6. Quirky Philosophical Views: Kim also expresses unique philosophical viewpoints, such as the importance of balancing physical and intellectual pursuits, and a thoughtful, empathetic approach to critique oai_citation:9,Eric Kim philosophy quotes – ERIC KIM.

Eric Kim’s rich philosophy, as gleaned from his work and writings, highlights a thoughtful and reflective approach to life and art, rooted in authenticity, continual learning, and a deep engagement with his craft and the world around him.

Vid

The life of Seneca:

The goal—

Strive for *AT LEAST* 10x gains!

For example my initially maybe in 2018-2019– buying Bitcoin at around $6,000 USD a bitcoin and riding it up to $~65,000 USD a Bitcoin.

Certainly! Here are some quotes from the text:

1. “Stoicism, stoic, the stoa in ancient Greece– essentially the stoa was like some sort of portico, patio, pillar, outside, essentially a spot where guys would just hang out, talk shop, talk philosophy, etc.”
2. “My theory about a lot of modern day antisocial behavior has to do with the structures which enclose us.”
3. “Cramped indoor spaces promote antisocial behavior.”
4. “Stoicism — it was originally I think codified by this guy named Zeno, and over time he picked up some followers.”
5. “What I like about stoicism is how loosey goosey it is.”
6. “I think philosophy must be practical.”
7. “Trust no thinker who does drugs!”
8. “Just imagine it will all go down to zero.”
9. “The notion of ‘debasing’ the coin or the currency is the general idea that you are not a coward in regards to money.”
10. “Real life is interaction with other human beings, and social conquest.”
11. “Perhaps we should just adopt this stoic mindset towards other people; some people are actually physiologically ill, mentally unwell… don’t trust the opinion of nobody.”
12. “Better to be a gay monster than a sentimental bore!” – Fernandino Galliani, via Nietzsche
13. “I think the only and the only proper way to lift weights is one repetition maximum training.”
14. “If you’re interested in stoicism, and have had some interesting thoughts on stoicism, one of the most noble things you could do is start your own blog.”

These quotes reflect the key themes and perspectives on Stoicism as presented in the text.

Summarizing the provided text into a numbered list:

1. Introduction to Stoicism: Emphasizes the practicality and everyday applicability of Stoicism, lacking in existing guides.
2. Concept of Stoicism: Draws parallels between ancient Greek Stoas and modern public spaces like parks for socializing and philosophical discussions.
3. The New Stoa: Recounts personal experiences of physical fitness and social interactions in public parks during COVID-19.
4. Open Air, Open Sun Concept: Highlights the benefits of outdoor spaces for socializing and physical well-being.
5. Philosophy’s Audience: Describes Stoicism’s organic growth from Zeno’s informal gatherings to a wider following.
6. Nature of Stoicism: Compares Stoicism to Zen and Taoism, focusing on its pragmatic aspects.
7. Discovery of Stoicism: Mentions learning about Stoicism from Nassim Taleb’s “Antifragile” and delving deep into its literature.
8. Significance of Seneca: Shares a personal connection with Seneca’s practical and real-world-oriented philosophy.
9. Seneca’s Practicality: Appreciates Seneca for his accessible and real-world-relevant writings.
10. Stoic Ideals and Physical Fitness: Envisions a Spartan, physically fit Stoic ideal, stressing the importance of physical health.
11. Stoicism’s Relevance Today: Discusses Stoicism as a tool for fear conquering in various aspects of life, including entrepreneurship and crypto speculation.
12. Stoicism and Capitalism: Explores the compatibility of Stoicism with capitalist values and its utility against fear-mongering.
13. Sex and Stoicism: Argues for the applicability of Stoicism to both sexes in overcoming societal pressures.
14. Stoic Strategies: Advocates for a departure from conventional ethics and morality, critiquing mainstream philosophical views.
15. Stoic Training and Modern Ailments: Proposes stoic practices for overcoming contemporary issues like indoor confinement, lack of physical activity, and reliance on conventional therapy.
16. Real Stoics and Self-Identity: Reflects on the paradox of self-labelling and the true essence of luxury and influence.
17. Stoicism as a Tool: Advocates for viewing Stoicism as a flexible tool rather than a rigid doctrine, drawing examples from Marcus Aurelius.
18. The Future of Stoicism: Envisions an evolving, personalized approach to Stoicism, adapted to different environments and living conditions.
19. Stoicism in Social Contexts: Highlights the importance of human interactions and societal engagement in Stoic philosophy.
20. More Ideas on Stoicism: Offers additional Stoic strategies for dealing with judgment, mental health, and societal pressures.
21. Stoicism’s Role in Overcoming Fear: Discusses the role of ethics and morality in shaping fears, particularly in street photography.
22. Influence of Physical Health on Mood: Draws connections between physical fitness, outdoor exposure, and mental well-being.
23. Stoic Assignments and Ideals: Suggests practical exercises and lifestyle choices reflecting Stoic values, emphasizing physical fitness and an open, sociable demeanor.
24. Stoicism and Masculinity: Associates Stoicism with traditionally masculine traits and physical strength.
25. Real Stoic Qualities: Describes an ideal Stoic as joyful, playful, and unburdened by societal norms.
26. Adults and Stoicism: Critiques adult pessimism and advocates for maintaining a childlike optimism and cheerfulness.
27. Stoicism and Carnivorism: Argues controversially for a human-centric view of nature and dismisses animal rights.
28. End Goals of Stoicism: Aligns Stoicism with entrepreneurship, innovation, art, and design, emphasizing the importance of courage.
29. Physical Aspects of Stoicism: Recommends maximum effort physical training as a Stoic practice.
30. Future Actions: Encourages sharing Stoic thoughts through blogging and vlogging, promoting open-source and independent content creation.

Introduction to Stoicism 

Something I have been meaning to write or create or do is like some sort of book, ebook, pamphlet, or introductory primer to stoicism. I really think that stoicism is probably one of the most useful and philosophical models to live normal every day real life. Yet, I haven’t really found a good instructional guide on it, especially when I was self teaching it to myself.

Consider this a practical primer, cutting through the BS:

What does stoicism mean? 

Stoicism, stoic, the stoa in ancient Greece– essentially the stoa was like some sort of portico, patio, pillar, outside, essentially a spot where guys would just hang out, talk shop, talk philosophy, etc.  

I think about the show “Hey Arnold” in which I was raised with… the notion of “stoop kid“, the notion of a stoop is that in a lot of cities, especially the east coast in New York, you have this little stoop or porch, stairs that go outside your front door… and you could just hang out there, engage in social and neighborhood life etc.

The new stoa? 

One of my happiest moments was when I was living in Providence Rhode Island, and then COVID-19 hit. Everything was closed, besides the park. I can still go to the park, hang out, workout, do chin ups– I learned how to do muscle ups, more bodyweight calisthenics stuff, and also… I had a lot of fun with this “rock toss“ challenge and workout… in the middle of the park was a huge ass rock and huge ass stone, and every single day I would go there pick it up, and then eventually work out with it; throwing it around for fun, doing overhead presses with it, clean and jerks, squats, and eventually I would just throw it around for fun. Funny enough it might have been the most fit I was in my life… this was the true “functional” fitness.

The inspiration — Hector lifting an insanely massive stone (barely 2 strong men could lift it)… using it to break down the door of the ships of the other side.

Open air, open sun concept

Anyways, the reason why that period of covid was so good is that it was in the middle of beautiful Providence Rhode Island summer, so nice and bright and warm and lovely… and one of the good things was going to the park was like an open forum, a new anatheum for a lot of really cool guys to come, hang out, talk shop, go topless and shirtless, workout and hang out.

I met some really interesting people during that period of time. I met some guys who were really cool. For example, one guy I met was in the US military Navy, I think he was training to be a Navy seal or Delta force or something. Another guy in some sort of ROTC training, another cool guy from the hood, and also I would say I probably met half a dozen friendly drug dealers there. And of course a lot of people who believed in conspiracy theories; really friendly, a little weird, but overall good guys.

Anyways, one of the biggest benefits of hanging out at that outdoor park, open air, nothing but green grass, the beautiful sun and the fitness equipment was that I think having this sort of open air environment is actually very conducive to socializing, thinking and thought, and pro social behavior. My theory about a lot of modern day antisocial behavior has to do with the structures which enclose us. For example, almost universally most guys at the gym are extremely antisocial. Why? My theory is that because most gyms have closed, cramped narrow ceilings, and do not have access to natural light, or outside space.

Cramped indoor spaces promote antisocial behavior.

The only good gym I went to which was interesting was the golds gym in Venice, which has this really big outdoor workout area. I think this is much more natural and more fun and better; to be able to work out directly outside outdoors, with your shirt off.

Who is this philosophy for?

Stoics, stoicism — it was originally I think codified by this guy named Zeno, and over time he picked up some followers. Essentially the whole thing happened organically; Zeno would first share his thinking on philosophy ethics and pragmatic ways to deal with other people and the downsides of life, he built a following, and then his followers would propagate the thoughts and start their own little schools of thoughts, their own little stoic clubs.

What is “real” stoicism?

Would I like about stoicism is how loosey goosey it is. It is kind of like zen, or taoism… it is not really quantified as a religion, or a strict moral order. In fact, a lot of the ancients stoics would meditate on random stuff like cosmology, natural sciences like Seneca, how volcanoes worked or whatever. I think nowadays in today’s world, we focus primarily on the pragmatic side; how to deal with fear, uncertainty, downsides etc.

So how did I discover stoicism?

I think I might’ve first learned about stoicism from Nassim Taleb and his ANTIFRAGILE book. I was curious, and my curiosity went to deep. To quote NASSIM TALEB and the Venetian saying “The ocean goes deeper, the deeper you wade into it.”

I literally consumed every single book I could find on stoicism, even the obscure ones. Funny enough, a lot of the stoic thinkers tried to claim other philosophers as being stoic, like Seneca did with Diogenes the cynic. 

Cynic, cynicism, actually comes from the word canine, the dog. Diogenes was considered the “dog” philosopher, first used as a pejorative, but ultimately Diogenes reappropriated that title for fun! He saw dogs as tough, almost like wild wolves, rather than seeing them as a negative thing.

Even Achilles when he was raging against king Agamemnon, he called him “dog faced“ as a heaping insult.

Who is worth reading?

First, Seneca. Seneca the younger, his dad was called Seneca the elder.

In fact, this is such a big deal because Cindy and I named our first son, Seneca, directly after the stoic philosopher. This is true soul in the game; if you name your kid after your favorite philosopher, certainly it is a sign that you really liked that philosopher, or found them impactful.

The reason why I really like Seneca the stoic philosopher is because he had real connections to real reality. What that means is he wasn’t just on the sidelines; he actually existed in the real world, engaged in real politics, was even advisor to the emperor Nero, the bad one, who eventually low-key coerced Seneca to commit suicide, in a manly, dignified manner.

I think this was because maybe… there was actually a plan to overthrow Nero, and essentially Nero found out. 

What makes Seneca so good?

I really like Seneca because his writing is accessible, practical and pragmatic, and interesting.

A lot of thinkers tend to lack connections to real reality, I have no tolerance for boring philosophers to talk about metaphysics, which is things which are not physical. Like thoughts ideas, the universe, electricity and energy, strange phenomenon and conspiracy theories on ghosts, “energy” whatever.

For a long time, I would hear the term “metaphysics” being thrown around, and I had zero idea what it actually meant. 

Meta– on top of. Or nestled within.

Physics — the physical, physical phenomenon like gravity, first principles.

The reason why metaphysics philosophers tend to be a bunch of losers is that they are all weak and anemic, nerds or geeks or weaklings who seem to have some sort of physiological degeneracy, which encourages them to opine or talk or think about impractical things, superficial things.

Personally speaking, I think philosophy must be practical. 

Practical, praxis, practice — to do!

The Spartan, Zen Stoic, demigod ideal

I have a very funny ideal; the general idea is that your body looks like a demigod, and your physiology is out of control. The general idea is one must be tall, strong, highly muscular, low body fat percentage, I’m not exactly sure what my body fat percentage is, but maybe it’s around 5%.

Also, physical fitness is critical to any stoic. My ideal is to walk 50 miles a day, eat 20 pounds of meat like Milo of Croton a day. And also, abstinence from silly things like media, alcohol, drugs, marijuana etc.

Trust no thinker who does drugs!

Even our best friend Nietzsche said that coffee was bad, because it would make people dark and gloomy. He encouraged 100% cocoa powder instead. 

You let the drugs talk I let my soul talk ayy! – Kendrick Lamar

Simple technique:

First, look at a picture or a portrait or a full body shot, ideally topless of the artist, philosopher or thinker or individual… then judge their thoughts later.

Why? My theory is this: the thoughts of an individual is hugely affected by their bodily physiology.

For example, an extreme example: if somebody is locked inside a solitary confinement cell, and not permitted to go outside for years, but, he had a pen and pad and would jot down some thoughts… Would be the quality of these thoughts? Certainly dark and morose.

Why does stoicism matter? 

In today’s world, why does it matter, what is the significance of stoicism, etc.?

First and foremost, I think we are living in a troubling time, especially with the advent of modern day internet based media and advertising. I think 99% of what is propagated on the internet is fear mongering, and what is hate? Hate is just fear.

The first thought on stoicism is that it is just fear conquering. What I discovered about street photography, is that 99% of it is conquering your fears. Conquering your fears of upsetting other people, getting in some sort of verbal or physical altercation etc. In fact my bread and butter workshop is my conquering your fears and street photography workshop, the workshop which is still interesting to me even after a decade.

Why is this so important? I think it is rooted in almost everything; conquering your fears is rooted in entrepreneurship, innovation, risktaking and real life.

Even my speculation in crypto. 99.9% of crypto speculation is just balls. Having the balls to make big bets, and when things go south, knowing how to master your emotions.

A simple extra I have is this: just imagine it will all go down to zero.

It was useful because when I was in college, my sophomore year I got really into trading stocks, and I eventually lost my whole life savings, maybe around $3500 USD, and some bad penny stock which I actually misread the financials… the whole time I thought the company was making a profit, but actually it was taking a loss. I actually didn’t know that if profits are written in parentheses, it means a loss.

It was funny because my initial start as an investor was back in high school, I bought some Adobe stock when I was a high school junior, and also some mutual funds, which both went up after about 4-5 years.

Also I remember in elementary school computer class, when I was in the sixth grade in Bayside Queens, there was some sort of stock stimulation trading game, and actually it was funny… the kids who made the most money and were the most successful just put 100% of everything into Apple, note this is when we were only 12 years old, and I was born in 1988.

Stoicism and capitalism?

Funny enough, it seems that stoicism actually plays well with capitalism. Why? According to modern day capitalist thinking, the best way to approach life is to be objective, strong, stoic, unemotional, logical and rational.

Also, with modern day media there is so much fear mongering in the news, about some sort of global armageddon, global financial ruin, etc. I call it “fear porn”.

Therefore stoicism as a mindset is useful to think and position your mind in such a way that you could consider that life is all upside, no downside.

In fact, if I could summarize stoicism in one sentence, it is that life is all upside, no downside. Inspired by NASSIM TALEB.

Sex and Stoicism

So, is stoicism useful to you if you’re a man or a woman? Does it matter?

The good thing is I think it could apply to both sexes. Conquering sexism and social pressures is useful if you’re woman, and also if you’re a man.

Also, gender is social. Lot of the expectations set on us by society is socialized and gamed to a certain degree.

Stoic strategies 

First, we got to unchain ourselves from modern day ethics and morality. I believe that all modern day philosophy and thinking and ethics and religion is bad.

For example, the notion of turning the other cheek is a patently bad one. Why did Jesus turn his cheek? It is because he lacked on army.

Also, philosophically I think we should put no trust in Socrates. I thought which has puzzled me for a long time was this “Why was Socrates so ugly?

Monster in face, monster in soul.

I think Socrates was a degenerate, and he lacked any sort of real power. Therefore he turned logic and rationality into his terrorizing weapon (via Nietzsche). Back in the day, you didn’t need logic or rationality to have things your way, you simply was able to dictate that which you wanted to pause it, because you had a military force behind you. Just think about Machiavelli and IL PRINCIPE– the reality of being a mercurial prince, king, and military leader is hard, stoic, “immoral”. But ultimately it all comes down to war, conquest, the military.

Trust nobody who uses rationality or logic as their tyrannizing weapon. 

In fact, I believe that all should have the body and strength of some sort of super soldier. Essentially look like all the guys from the movie 300, this is our ideal.

Demigod physique. 

What has helped me

1. Allow yourself to be a bad, immortal, “evil” person. When you decide to adopt an unorthodox way of thinking and living, you’re going to rub some feathers the wrong way. And truth be told, even if you act in a strange vibrant way… At worse you’re only “mildly” annoying other people.
2. For good inspirations, I think the best stoic writers and thinkers include Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius and also the humor of the cynic philosopher Diogenes. I would even posit the idea that one could consider Alexander the Great as a stoic. Why? When you’re trying to create an empire, and you always have your life on the line, certainly this takes a stoic mindset. Also, let us think and consider that Alexander the Great had a copy of the Iliad by his bedstand, it was the only book he traveled with during his military tours.
3. Imagine the worst possible case scenario, and backtrack: Apparently even NASSIM TALEB would do this when he was a trader; every single day when he would go to his trading desk, he would assume that his investments would all go to zero, and if that wasn’t the case every single day, it was just upside. Therefore for myself, I just think to myself very simple; imagine like I got zero dollars, zero money, and literally all I need is meat, a Wi-Fi connection and I’m good. 
4. Live like a poor person: The notion of “debasing“ the coin or the currency is the general idea that you are not a coward in regards to money. The best way to think about money is like a social tool; I think money is actually just codified labor. If you want people to clean bathrooms, run the cashiers stand, you have to promise them money. Even Seneca said the upsides of simulated poverty; essentially living like a poor person, or even a homeless person when you don’t need to… is the ultimate position to be in. Why? True freedom of spirit and soul; as a philosopher thinker writer or whatever… you cannot be “canceled”, because there is nothing to cancel. As long as you could pay your rent, buy meat at Costco, and publish your thoughts to your own self hosted website blog, and pay your server fee, you have 100% freedom. And also, still… America is the best place to be because there is true freedom of speech and expression, you don’t want to be a trillionaire but not be able to say what’s really on your mind. And I think this is the big issue with entertainers, actors, media people… as long as you’re signed to a contract, you don’t run your own production company, or, you’re still a slave to money… you’re not really going to see what’s really on your mind. Why is it that the Rock cannot say anything bad about China, or Tibet? Because he is still enslaved by the media corporation. New slaves by Kanye West.

And this is the true courage of Kanye West; he literally put everything on the line, and even lost his spouse and I think maybe his kids? All for the sake of revealing inequities. 

“I throw these Maybach keys fucking c’est la vie! I know that we the new slaves.”- Ye

Stoic training

The fun thing about stoicism is that you could just make it up as you go, devise your own strategies and whatever.

“Fucking c’est la vie!” My favorite Kanye West line.

Essentially the general idea is that in life, one should not take things too seriously. Laughter is golden, I forget the philosopher who was called the laughing philosopher… Democritus?; better to laugh about the follies of human beings rather than to be dark and morose about it.

Also, thoughts from the Odyssey; if you look far enough  into the future, everything becomes comedic and hilarious.

So when you’re in some sort of bad situation, just think to yourself “Perhaps one day, 20 or 30 years from now… I will look back at this and just laugh!” It will just be humorous.

Honestly, laughter, and kind of being able to joke about things might be the best way to live life and deal with setbacks. 

Modern day ailments

Problems in modern day life:

1. Too much time spent indoors, not enough time out in the sun. Perhaps it is better to be out outside all day, and joyful, even with the risk of getting skin cancer or whatever… rather than to be indoors, scared, weak and anemic. Differences between if you’re a man or a woman, but still… the most beautiful skin has a sunkissed, olive color tone; the true privilege is having a full body tan. 
2. Get chatGPT, the paid premium one. And use the image generation AI art tool DALL-E. People pay therapists to just speak their mind, and get some sort of sounding board. I actually think it’s much better to chat with AI instead; because it will not judge you, and ultimately what is a therapist anyways? A therapist is just a mirror, a sounding board for you to verbalize and flesh out your thoughts. Often when we talk about our problems, 90% of the issues go away because once we verbalize it, we feel much better about ourselves. The next thing I’m going to do is build some sort of therapy bot. 
3. Not enough walking: I have never met anybody who walks 30,000 steps a day and is depressed. Even my friend Jimmy, who works as a US postal worker delivering the mail, he walks around 30,000 steps a day and is always bright cherry and jovial. I think this is also where people who hike a lot or walk a lot in nature are so happy; when you’re able to walk around a lot, and zen out… you just feel much better. My simple suggestion is when you go on a hike or a walk in nature or even in the city… leave your phone at home, or locked inside your glove compartment, and don’t bring any headphones or speakers or Apple watches or whatever. Just bring along your camera, and enjoy. My personal ideal is the bear lifestyle; walking 50 miles a day. 

Real stoics don’t call themselves Stoics?

A funny thing I have learned is that when you call something something, it isn’t that.

For example, if someone calls something a “luxury car”, it ain’t. For example, a true modern day luxury car is maybe a Tesla, but Tesla never calls itself a luxury car. Also the ultimate luxury technology company is probably Apple… but Apple is very intelligent and not calling themselves a luxury brand.

A pro tip is when it comes to websites, read the alternative text, the header text, the stuff that shows up in the tab of your browser window. If the website, the automotive retailer tries to market themselves as a “luxury” brand, typically it is actually a sign that it isn’t a luxury brand it isn’t luxury brand.

Thought: what are some good examples of true luxury brands which don’t overly calls itself luxury? 

In someways, we can think and consider stoicism as our new luxury. In fact, having luxury, luxury of mind and soul… and luxury of freedom of speech, isn’t this the ultimate luxury?

When somebody asked Diogenes the cynic; “What is the best human good”? He said “Freedom of speech, speaking your mind, having the power to see whatever is on your mind.”

In fact, my current joy is becoming more and more free talking, and free riding. What that means is this; I’m ain’t going to censor myself no more, even if I might be politically incorrect insensitive or whatever. 

Also, I would prefer to speak my mind and seriously hurt the feelings of others, rather than soften it for the sake of the other person. 

Similarly speaking, when people call themselves “influencers”, they are not influencers.

Stoicism as a technique and tool, not the end

Ultimately I think we should think of stoicism just like having another tool inside our tool kit. For example, if you’re a chef, you’re going to have different knives for different purposes. If you’re going to cut a big piece of meat, you probably want a big ass meat cutting knife, not something you would use to slice an apple with. Similarly speaking, if you’re going to scoop out the insides of an avocado, better to use a spoon rather than using a fork, or a knife. 

I think the problem is when some people get too into stoicism (I prefer writing stoicism with a lowercase), they think that everything needs to be consistent, and must fit into this nice little neat box of what is considered “stoicism“. This is a bad line of thinking… let us consider that Marcus Aurelius never even mentioned stoicism in his writings, his collections of thoughts, which we moderns call THE MEDITATIONS… it was just essentially his personal diary, to help him conquer his own personal fears and thoughts, I don’t think he ever intended it to be published publicly. I think he just wrote it to himself as self therapy. And I think the only stoic philosopher he even mentions is maybe Epictetus.

The future of stoicism?

For myself, I just come out with certain to work out thoughts and techniques because it helps me, and when I find these tricks or techniques or secret hacks or cheat codes… My passion is to simply share it with others. 

And ultimately, things are ever in flux and evolving and changing and adapting.

For example, I’ve discovered the quality of my thinking is different when I am in Culver City Los Angeles, compared to being in the boring suburbs of Orange County.

Also depending on my social environments… my stoic thoughts are different when I am in a gym, vs just working out by myself in my parking spot in the back of my apartment.

Also, the quality of my thoughts is different when living with family members or other people versus just living with myself Cindy and Seneca.

Stoicism is all about living with other people

Assuming you’re not growing your own vegetables and living in the middle of nowhere… you probably have some interaction with other human beings. As long as you have an iPhone, an Android phone, a smartphone, a 4G or 5G internet connection, wifi, a laptop, have to buy groceries somewhere… you’re still going to have to interact with other human beings.

And this is good. There is no other greater joy than other human beings.

In fact, modern-day society is strange because in someways, the ethos is to be antisocial and to be cowardly. But in fact, the best way to think about things is that real life is interaction with other human beings, and social conquest. One can imagine a lot of modern day entrepreneurship as simply a big dick swinging contest. He who is the most masculine confident tall and strong and stoic shall win.

More ideas

Assume that everyone is mentally insane: Have you ever been out in public, and you see some sort of crackhead or strange homeless person who acts radically, smells terrible, and is obviously mentally ill? Do you hate them for it? When they say something weird to you… do you take it personally? No. Why? They are crazy. Perhaps we should just adopt this stoic mindset towards other people; some people are actually physiologically ill, mentally unwell… don’t trust the opinion of nobody.

A lot of people are trying to actually deal with their own inner demons: For example, becoming the successful photographer and street photographer I am today… I’ve dealt with some individuals who would say anonymous bad things about me, and later I found out that their mom just died or something. I cannot imagine what it feels like losing a mother… therefore if somebody spew some hate on me because something bad happened to them, I’m not gonna take it personally.

Self-flagellation: I think a lot of people who are sick, mentally or physiologically self flagellate themselves. Essentially the way that they deal with other people or themselves is some sort of metaphorical self-flagellation.

For example… you know those strange individuals who have the whip and whip themselves, and inflict pain on themselves? I think some people do this metaphorically to themselves and others.

You just want to stay away from them.

Why so scared?

My personal theory on fear is that a lot of it is tied to morality and ethics. I think the general idea is not necessarily that we are afraid of anything… I think the true fear is that we’re afraid that we are some sort of bad evil unethical immoral person.

For example in street photography, the general ethical thought is that it is immoral to take a photo of somebody without their permission, because there is some sort of it inherent evil behind it. Is this true? No. Taking photos and not really a big deal.

Why do people make such a big deal out of small things?

I think it is because some people are just overly sensitive, which once again comes from some sort of physiological weakness.

For example, if you’re a weightlifter who could lift 1000 pounds, assuming you’re not taking any steroids or anything… are small things going to bother you? No. But let us assume that you are a skinny fat man, all you do is drink alcohol and smoke marijuana and watch Netflix, and you spent too much time on Reddit… you are 40% body fat, and have never lifted in your life. And also your testosterone is low and you never go outside. Certainly the quality of your thoughts is going to be different than if you’re a happy gay monster, lifting weights outside in the direct sun, laughing and having fun. 

In fact, I’ve actually personally discovered that the reason why a lot of people hate me is because I am so happy jovial and gay. They are secretly suspicious or envious of me? 

Weather and mood

Probably one of my worst experiences was this jarring transition; I was super happy insanely happy being in Vietnam in 2017; with a beautiful weather, the beautiful light, the happy people the great amenities etc.… and then that winter Cindy and I went to Europe, in Marseille Berlin and Prague, and maybe London… seriously the worst winter of my life. Why? I wonder if so much miserable feelings and thoughts simply comes from the darkness and lack of light. a lot of Europe is actually quite miserable; dark, unhygienic, morose.

Even Nietzsche had a thought about Schopenhauer; How much of these emo European philosophers came from the fact that it was just complaining about the cold weather in Germany etc.?

For myself, my ideal weather is Southeast Asia; I love being in Phnom Penh Cambodia, Vietnam etc. In the states, am I the only one who loves living in Los Angeles? Dr. Dre and Kendrick Lamar said that LA was the best for women weed and weather… I would definitely say the biggest upside of living in Los Angeles is the light, the sunlight. It actually does get quite cold here, but usually most reliably even in December during the winter time, the sun will always come up. As long as there is bright sunny light, I will be happy. And I think maybe for myself, considering that I am a photographer, and photography means painting with light… light for me is critical.

I also wonder how much of it is a physiological thing and a genetic trait; for example I could even recall being a young child, and my mom telling me that the most critical thing in finding a home or an apartment was light and natural light. Even now… 90% of my happiness comes from being able to have access to natural light, ideally floor to ceiling windows facing directly the sun, having some sort of modern temperature regulated apartment and home. Even living in our tiny studio minimalistic luxury apartment in Providence Rhode Island, where it was always 75° warm and cozy, and not frigid and damp and cold and dark and humid… I was always good. But moving to an older house, where it always felt damp and cold… this literally lowered my happiness by 1000%.

Therefore, if you’re feeling miserable sad or whatever… I say spend three months living in Hanoi or Saigon in Vietnam, or go to Phnom Penh Cambodia. I wonder if 90% of peoples misery is simply due to the weather.

Stoic assignments

”Better to be a gay monster than a sentimental bore!” – Fernandino Galliani, via Nietzsche

My stoic ideal is somebody who is happy, gay, smiling, no headphones or AirPods on, no sunglasses on, no hat, no facial hair, no baggy oversized clothing, no tint in their car. Somebody who makes great eye contact, laughs, stands up upright, jokes, and fools around. Like an overgrown child.

Also, lift weights at least once every day, ideally in the direct sun. Just buy some weightlifting equipment on Titan.fitness, I like the farmers carry handles, the Olympic loadable dumbbell, and also the Texas power squat bar. Just buy some cheap weights, and or buy a heavy 400 pound sandbag, and just have fun throwing it around.

True stoics are masculine

A true stoic should look something like Hercules or Achilles. Or like ERIC KIM; I have the aesthetic and the physique of Brad Pitt in FIGHT CLUB except with a lot more muscle. Like my friend Soren says, the Adonis physique and proportions.

A real stoic is sexy

I think a real stoic is sexy, happy and fun. Who doesn’t take life too seriously; and think of everything like a fun game. A real stoic would be joyful and cheery like three-year-old child without any adulteration from the outside world.

Why do adults become so dark and morose?

I don’t like talking with or hanging out with adults, uninteresting.

At what point or age do people become so emo?

Typically, highschoolers are very optimistic. Even college students. But I think at least in maybe college in high school nowadays… the bad trend is towards “over concern”, about the world the planet ethics animals etc.

I find a lot of this thinking superficial, performative, and uncritical. I think “animal rights“, “saving the planet” is this new pseudo world religion; which is just capitalism 3.0. I find the whole pet industry the whole dog industry to be insanely bizarre, and I trust nobody who talks about “saving the planet“ who owns an iPhone, owns any sort of car, or has an Amazon prime subscription. Certainly not any vegans.

A real stoic is a carnivore 

Animals are animals. They are lower on the hierarchy and totem pole on earth. Man is the apex predator, the apex bully and the apex tyrant.

Should we care for animals or “animal rights”? No. Animals are our slaves.

If you consider even dogs and pets… they are essentially our emotional slaves. People talk a lot about the virtuosity of dogs being loyal or whatever… and giving you unconditional love. This seems like some sort of emotional slavery.

The only dogs I respect are some sort of canine dogs, some sort of attack or defense dogs, or hunting dogs. For example, John Wick 3; Halle Barry and her dogs. An animal should either be a weapon, or nothing.

Why do people care about animals so much?

Essentially it looks like men no longer have a backbone. No more spine.

I trust nobody who owns a dog.

Let us not forget; they call it dog ownership, or “owning a pet”. There is no more concept of “human ownership, or “owning a human.”

End goals 

What is the end goal of humanity? To me it is towards entrepreneurship, innovation, art and aesthetics, philosophy etc. Design.

Stoicism should be considered a tool which could aid you in these things.

For example, I think 99% of entrepreneurship is courage. Stoicism could help you with that.

I also think with design, great design is also 99% courage, having the courage to attempt something that won’t sell or be received well… stoicism is all about practical courage. The only designers with courage include Steve Jobs, Jony Ive, Elon Musk, Kanye West. 

Also, weightlifting. To attempt to lift a certain weight you have never attempted before takes great courage. For example, me atlas lifting 1000 pounds; that is 10 plates and a 25 on each side, this is true stoic training. Why? The fear of injury is what holds most people back; if you had successfully conquered this fear and not injured yourself, this is pure stoic bliss.

The physical

I think the only and the only proper way to lift weights is one repetition maximum training. That is; what is the maximum amount of weight you’re able to successfully lift or move, even half an inch?

To me, the courage is the success. Even if you had the courage to attempt it… that is what is considered success. 

Simple exercises to do include the atlas lift, innovated by ERIC KIM, or a one repetition max rack pull.

Or, a high trap bar deadlift, heavy Farmer’s walks, or heavy sandbag carries. Or even a simple thing you could do is go to the park or to the local nature center, find the biggest rock there and just see if you could pick it up.

Now what?

If you’re interested in stoicism, and have had some interesting thoughts on stoicism, one of the most noble things you could do is start your own blog. I think blogs are 1000 times more effective than publishing some sort of static printed book; I think the problem in today’s world is that everyone is seeking some sort of legitimacy by being picked up by some sort of legitimate publisher and getting “published“, and seeing your printed book at Barnes & Noble whatever.

I say it is better to be open source, free and permissionless, decentralized. Just publish your thoughts and book as a free PDF, and just host it on dropbox, Google Drive, or your own web server. Share the link freely, and also just publish the raw text as a big blog post. 

Even Sam Bankman-Fried wisely thought; 99.9% of books could just be summarized as big blog posts.

Don’t trust any modern day published book which isn’t free, because… there is some sort of hidden clout chasing somewhere. 

Even one of the worst compromises that led to the demise of Ray Dalio was the fact that he took his Principles book, which was essentially a free ebook PDF on his website, and then took it off, because I think he got a book deal with Simon and Schuster. After he did that, he lost my respect.

If you’re already independently wealthy, and you don’t crowd source your self-esteem… why would you need to externally validate yourself by getting some sort of constipated publisher and annoying editor?

Editors are bad.

Now what?

Start your own blog and start blogging your own thoughts on stoic philosophy, and even start a YouTube channel and start vlogging on it. My generalized thought is simple: if your thought your idea your blog post your video or whatever could even impact the life of one other human being on planet earth… it is worth it.

ERIC

What is the secret to the maximum amount of happiness in life? The maximum amount of danger. (Nietzsche).

ERIC

Something which happened about a year ago —

No more glocks

Vlog

The story

Long story short, some idiot brings his gun to my sister’s wedding, leaves it inside the holster in his backpack in the guest checking room, some random lady at the party who steals a bunch of stuff inside the guest checking room discovers the gun, hides it under my backpack on top of my son’s car seat, and flees the scene.

Simple morales to the story

First and foremost, if you are a registered gun owner, have a conceal and carry license, etc., don’t bring your gun to a wedding. Or any big event or family gathering, where no potential danger is eminent.

Second, if you’re going to get married, or even go to a wedding, etc., kindly ask the host whether the space is a “gun free zone.” Also, if you’re going to plan a wedding, tell your guests that this is a gun free wedding, or a gun free zone, and not to bring your firearms.

Discovering the Glock pistol

Essentially unbeknownst to us, during the wedding, a lady named Ruby, a “friend“ of the grooms mom was invited to the wedding, and the lady has some serious mental issues. I think she was drunk and high off Xanax at the wedding, and during the wedding she actually went to the guest check in bedroom, and rummaged through everyone’s stuff, stole a bunch of phones and cash, stole all of the credit cards and cash out of my wallet, and fled the scene. Apparently she also discovered Joseph’s gun (Joseph is the name of the fucking idiot who brought his gun to the wedding) in Joseph’s backpack, which was left unattended in the guest checking room, which contained his Glock pistol inside a holster. Ruby was able to successfully, even when drunk and high, take the Glock pistol out of the holster, and somehow hide it in between my backpack and my sons car seat.

The bigger ethical issue at hand

Ultimately, I think trying to ascribe “fault” or “blame in the situation is vain and empty. Instead, what is actually a far more critical is to address bigger issues at hand:

Should one be ethically allowed to bring a conceal and carry weapon, a pistol to a wedding party, without anyone else knowing it?

For myself, I have no issue with people owning guns, and I’m also not anti-gun ownership or anti-guns. I’m a Boy Scout Eagle Scout, and I was able to successfully get my rifle and shotgun merit badge, in the same summer, so I know how to properly handle guns. Also truth be told, gun ownership is baked into America’s constitution and law, which means that guns will never go away in America.

For myself personally, I just want to be as far away from people, who have conceal and carried weapons or pistols on them. I have no issue with them owning them, I just don’t want to be around her physically. In the same room, or even the same area.

Takeaway thoughts

Therefore some ideas:

1. Put up signage saying that you are entering a gun free zone. You’re not permitted to bring your gun, or your conceal and carry gun on these premises.
2. If you’re going to get married, and you send out an invite, in the mail or email, say that this is a gun free wedding, please leave your firearms at home.
3. When insane situations arise, just open your iPhone and call 911. Better to report things, suspicious activity, even if there is a .01% chance that it might be fatal or dangerous, than not to. We must prevent another sandy hook.
4. Let us say that you are in a situation, in which potential gun violence can happen. Better to just inform all of the guests, call off the event and the wedding, even at the risk of spoiling your sister’s wedding. For example, my personal regret is after discovering the gun, what I should have done was first call the cops, and then inform all the guests that I discovered a gun in the guest bedroom, and I should’ve called off the wedding.
5. Don’t go to Walmart, or shop at places like dollar tree, or go to places which might have people who have a higher precedents for people carrying firearms. Superficially I have discovered that most people who brandish firearms tend to be lower socioeconomic status. Don’t hang out in bad neighborhoods, or even fill up your gas in dangerous neighborhoods. Perhaps this is a plus one for owning a Tesla or electric car.
6. Whenever you discover a firearm, unattended, just call 911 and call the cops and report it.

MY SOUL DIVINE
FUCK THE SUPERFICIAL AND OUTER
Think the inner, create your own winners.

Stoic zen thought
fight off the bots
Off the tweets and the streams
We on a ultra light beam

No need to squeam or emo in zines
No more magazines or magazines in the guns
Shoot it up with your own mind
No glock to your thoughts.

ERIC

I love Hyundai Genesis .. but the advertising, marketing and photos are so lame???

Fewer square inches, higher quality.

In line with the EK VISION.

What we seek.

For me — curiosity.

For example for almost anything —

VID

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

AUDIO

Something interesting which I have gleaned is that I actually have zero interest in racing. For me, the primary interest that I had in regards to cars is more of the car as a form of self expression?

Let us think critically. Let us imagine Jesus, Jesus Christ as a real man, just a mere mortal. A normal human being. What did he preach and promote?

Love

I mean a super simple thing is this notion of love. Unconditional love. I actually find this to be one of the most interesting and fascinating innovations; because typically, and also historically, love was conditional:

If you do this for me or obey me in this way, I will love you.

If you do not do it this way, I will NOT love you.

I witness a lot of conditionals for love

To me, the notion of conditional love is terrible. Maybe the best way to think about love in the context of your child is essentially your kid is a mini you; don’t you want to treat your kid the way you wish you were treated when you were a kid?

For example, I think culturally I witness this with the Vietnamese language, seeing Vietnamese grandmother’s talk to the grandchildren:

If you do this or eat this or listen to me, I will love you.

Similarly speaking, I witness this with American parenting:

If you don’t eat this or do this, I will be sad.

I think superficially, we think we are teaching our children empathy, but in actuality, it is another conditional for love. It is almost like some sort of weird emotional blackmail; because you’re not doing as I want you to do, I will be sad, and therefore your bad behavior of not obeying me is causing me pain sadness and sorrow.

How I am grateful for my mom

I think the greatest thing of all time that my mom did for me was to love me unconditionally, and to sacrifice everything for me my sister our family etc.

To me the logic was super obvious; the purpose of my mom, parents was to sacrifice everything in order for you to become great. And therefore as a consequence, you didn’t want to squander your potential.

How modern day America is funny?

America is funny and weird because on one hand, we are essentially all protestant Christians; in terms of how we think etc. Also which is weird is that we also focused too much on individualism, the cult of the individual, that I don’t want to sacrifice anything for anybody else unless it directly benefits me or maybe even indirectly benefits me.

**

Lessons Jesus has taught me:

• On Love
• You Are the Salt of the Earth
• You Are the Light of the World
• Forgive Others (70×7 times)
• “Ask, and it shall be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock and it shall be opened unto you.”

Learn more: Jefferson Bible

Eric Kim, known for his philosophical approach, especially in the context of photography, offers a range of quotes and insights that touch upon various aspects of life and creativity. While I didn’t find specific quotes by Eric Kim directly about Jesus, I did find reflections on related themes such as love, life, innovation, and personal philosophy.

1. On proactive creativity, Kim states, “It is better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission,” emphasizing the importance of taking initiative without waiting for external approval oai_citation:1,Eric Kim philosophy quotes – ERIC KIM.
2. Speaking on life and innovation, he encourages, “Keep moving, and you won’t stagnate. Never stop innovating, never stop making new stuff,” highlighting the value of continuous movement and innovation in life oai_citation:2,Eric Kim philosophy quotes – ERIC KIM.
3. Regarding personal philosophy, Kim’s focus is on simplicity, embracing uncertainty, and finding personal meaning through art, drawing inspiration from Stoicism oai_citation:3,Eric Kim philosophy quotes – ERIC KIM.
4. On critique and virtue, Kim shares thoughts like, “Just Leave Others Alone. You Can Only Critique that Which You Truly Understand and Love,” and “Virtue is a Privilege,” which reflect a thoughtful approach to interaction and moral excellence oai_citation:4,Eric Kim philosophy quotes – ERIC KIM.

Additionally, in his writings on Jesus, Kim reflects on Jesus as a philosopher and mentions some life lessons he has learned from Jesus, such as the importance of love, forgiveness, and seeking truth oai_citation:5,Why don’t we ever think of Jesus as a philosopher? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:6,Life Lessons Jesus Has Taught Me – ERIC KIM.

In a detailed exploration of the concept of love, Kim expresses that love is everything, holding human society together and is more than just an emotion; it’s a virtue shown through actions. He emphasizes love as an action, something that must be actively shown and practiced in daily life. Kim also touches upon the idea of love as service, suggesting that love involves not hurting others, not being greedy, and not seeking revenge. He stresses the importance of loving oneself, viewing each day as a new opportunity, and loving the work we do, seeing it as a way to positively impact others and the world oai_citation:7,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:8,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:9,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:10,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:11,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:12,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:13,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:14,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:15,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:16,On Love – ERIC KIM oai_citation:17,On Love – ERIC KIM.

These insights from Eric Kim offer a glimpse into his philosophical perspective, blending personal, practical, and existential themes.

St. Paul’s reappropriation of Jesus’ teachings is a fascinating topic, blending philosophical insights with theological innovation. Paul, originally a Pharisee and a persecutor of Christians, experienced a profound transformation after his encounter with the risen Christ on the road to Damascus. This pivotal event led him to reinterpret Jesus’ teachings in a way that significantly influenced Christian theology.

1. Universalizing the Message: Jesus’ ministry was predominantly among the Jews, and he focused on the imminent arrival of God’s kingdom. Paul, however, extended Jesus’ message to the Gentiles (non-Jews), emphasizing that salvation through Christ was available to all, not just to the Jewish people. This universalist perspective was a significant shift, highlighting inclusivity and broadening the appeal and reach of Christianity.
2. Justification by Faith: Paul emphasized the concept of justification by faith more than Jesus did. While Jesus’ teachings often focused on ethical living and the Kingdom of God, Paul taught that individuals are justified, or made righteous, through faith in Jesus Christ, not by adhering to the Law of Moses. This idea was revolutionary, as it suggested a direct personal relationship with God, accessible through faith, independent of ritual and law.
3. Christology: Paul’s interpretation of Jesus’ nature and role was profound. While Jesus spoke of the Kingdom of God and his role as a teacher and prophet, Paul presented Jesus as the cosmic Christ, the pre-existent Son of God who sacrificed himself for humanity’s sins. This high Christology laid the foundation for much of Christian thought about the nature of Jesus.
4. Eschatology: Paul also reinterpreted the eschatological (end times) expectations of Jesus’ teachings. While Jesus predicted the coming of the Kingdom of God, Paul focused on the return of Christ and the resurrection of the dead, giving a more defined shape to Christian expectations of the end times.
5. Ethical Teachings: While continuing the ethical teachings of Jesus, such as love, humility, and service, Paul also adapted and expanded them to address the diverse communities he was evangelizing. His letters deal with issues ranging from marital relations to food laws, offering practical guidance for living in a way that reflected Christ’s teachings.

Paul’s reinterpretation and expansion of Jesus’ teachings were instrumental in transforming a Jewish messianic movement into a global religion. His philosophical approach to theology, his emphasis on faith and grace, and his skill as a communicator and a thinker made him a pivotal figure in the early Christian church, shaping its doctrine and practice in ways that continue to resonate today.

It seems that the weird bias in today’s world is that it is more virtuous for things to be hard, arduous, difficult, pain inducing etc.

Why this weird bias?

I think it has to do with Christianity, this weird bastardization of suffering. For example, I thought I gleaned from Nietzsche when writing his book the antichrist; perhaps the best way we could think about modern-day Christianity is that it is essentially “Saint Paul-ism”.

Pain and suffering is bad

So I have some theories: first, Saint Paul seemed like a very tormented soul, and he sought salvation elsewhere. After the death of Jesus, I think St. Paul was deeply troubled… His world view in shambles. The ultimate cognitive dissonance.

Therefore, in order to rectify his existence, he made up all this weird Hocus Pocus about Jesus, his resurrection etc. As a form of dealing with his own inner torment .

***

Saint Paul as promoting intolerance:

Critiques about the writings of St. Paul are diverse and come from various perspectives, including theological, historical, and sociocultural viewpoints. These critiques often reflect the broader complexities and challenges of interpreting ancient texts in contemporary contexts.

1. Theological Disputes: Some theologians argue that Paul’s interpretation of Jesus’ message and his teachings about salvation, grace, and the law diverge significantly from what Jesus himself taught. This perspective suggests that Paul, rather than Jesus, was the primary developer of Christian theology, particularly the doctrine of justification by faith.
2. Historical Context and Accuracy: Scholars question the historical accuracy of certain aspects of Paul’s writings. For instance, debates arise over Paul’s portrayal of early Christian communities and his interpretation of historical events. Some critics argue that Paul’s letters must be read in the context of the first-century Greco-Roman world, which may differ significantly from contemporary understandings.
3. Views on Women and Gender Roles: Paul’s writings have been criticized for perpetuating patriarchal values, particularly in passages that instruct women to be submissive or silent in church settings (e.g., 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-12). However, interpretations vary, with some arguing that these passages reflect specific cultural contexts or are later additions.
4. Stance on Slavery: Paul’s apparent acceptance of slavery (e.g., in Philemon and Ephesians 6:5) has been a point of contention. Critics argue that by not condemning slavery outright, Paul’s writings contributed to the historical justification of the practice. Others suggest that his approach was pragmatic, aimed at preserving social order in his time.
5. Exclusivity and Dogmatism: Paul’s emphasis on the uniqueness of Christ for salvation has been seen as exclusivist or intolerant, especially in a pluralistic society. Critics argue that this perspective can lead to religious dogmatism and conflict.
6. Inconsistencies and Contradictions: Some critics point out inconsistencies within Paul’s letters and between his writings and other parts of the New Testament. These discrepancies raise questions about the development of early Christian doctrine and the interpretation of key theological concepts.
7. Cultural Relativism: Modern readers sometimes find Paul’s views challenging, as they reflect a cultural and historical context vastly different from the present. This leads to debates about how literally Paul’s teachings should be applied today, especially on issues like gender roles, sexual ethics, and societal structures.

In summary, critiques of Paul’s writings reflect the complex interplay of theology, historical context, and evolving ethical and cultural norms. Understanding these critiques requires careful consideration of both the historical context in which Paul wrote and the contemporary context in which his writings are interpreted.

How many years did St. Paul write after the death of Jesus?

St. Paul’s epistles, which form a significant part of the New Testament, were written approximately between 20 to 30 years after the death of Jesus. Jesus is believed to have died around 30-33 AD. Paul’s earliest letters, such as 1 Thessalonians, are typically dated to around 50-52 AD. His writing period extends to around 60-65 AD, around the time of his last epistles like Romans and possibly 2 Timothy.

This time frame is significant because it places Paul’s writings as some of the earliest Christian documents, preceding the writing of the Gospels. Paul’s letters provide a unique insight into the development of early Christian theology and the spread of Christianity in the Roman Empire during the first century.

EZ LOAD!

I have regretted often, but repented never. Is this a good thing?

The demands of mass production are contrary to my temperament, for I am mainly interested in promoting new developments. I should like to put something new into my cars every morning – an inclination that terrifies my staff. Were my wishes in this respect to be indulged, there would be no production of standard models at all, but only a succession of prototypes.

Promoting new developments

Think chassis…

Just try it out?

I gave the 4, 6 and 8 cylinder a chance. We even built a bi-cylinder. But the classical 12 cylinder engine remains my trademark and certainly the most popular of my engines.

Our proverb runs: ‘He who has his health is rich and doesn’t know it.’ You consider the essential fragility of life.

What we do at Ferrari is elite work.

Elite Work.

A car maker need be neither an engineer nor a technician. He must be someone who loves his passion for cars and he must be someone who knows a lot about human beings. His job is to harmonize the ambitions of his collaborators.

Dys (bad, difficult, not)… trophin, trophia— nourishment.

Hypertrophy is hyper, over, beyond nutrition!

Dystrophin is a vital protein for muscle function. It plays a crucial role in connecting the internal structure of muscle cells to the surrounding extracellular matrix. This connection helps to protect muscle fibers from injury as they contract and relax. In individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the gene responsible for producing dystrophin is mutated, leading to the absence or a significant reduction of this protein. This deficiency results in muscle weakness, damage, and the progressive symptoms of the disorder.

How he try to change diet

In his efforts to help his son Dino, who was suffering from muscular dystrophy, Enzo Ferrari meticulously monitored and adjusted Dino’s diet. He created a detailed table of the calorific values of various foods that would not harm Dino’s kidneys. Enzo also kept an up-to-date daily record of Dino’s medical parameters, including albumins, the specific gravity of his urine, the level of urea in his blood, and his diuresis. This level of detailed care reflects Enzo’s desperate hope to find a way to combat the progression of Dino’s disease oai_citation:1,Alfredo Ferrari – Wikipedia.

How did Enzo feel

Enzo Ferrari’s feelings about the death of his son, Dino, were marked by deep personal grief and a sense of helplessness. In his own words, Enzo expressed how he deluded himself into believing that his attentive care could help Dino recover, likening his efforts to maintain Dino’s health to the meticulous care he devoted to his cars. He kept detailed records of Dino’s diet and medical parameters, hoping for an indication of improvement. Unfortunately, the progression of Dino’s muscular dystrophy was relentless and incurable, leaving Enzo to face the painful reality of his son’s gradual decline and eventual passing oai_citation:1,Alfredo Ferrari – Wikipedia oai_citation:2,Alfredo Ferrari – Wikipedia.

This experience profoundly affected Enzo, shaping not only his personal life but also leaving a lasting imprint on the Ferrari brand. The naming of the “Dino” series of cars was a tribute to his son, reflecting Enzo’s deep emotional connection and the impact of this loss on his life and legacy.

Enzo Ferrari’s feelings about the death of his son Dino were deeply personal and profound. While Enzo was known for being a private and stoic individual, it is clear that Dino’s death had a significant emotional impact on him.

1. Grief and Loss: The loss of a child is an immensely painful experience for any parent, and Enzo was no exception. He was deeply affected by Dino’s illness and passing. The fact that Dino was involved in the family business and shared his passion for cars and racing likely compounded the sense of loss.
2. Tribute through Legacy: In response to his grief, Enzo paid tribute to his son in a manner that was fitting to their shared passion for automobiles. Naming the V6 engine and the series of “Dino” sports cars after his son was a way to honor Dino’s memory and keep his spirit alive within the Ferrari legacy. This move indicates the depth of Enzo’s emotional connection to his son and his desire to memorialize him in the realm they both cherished.
3. Personal and Professional Impact: Dino’s death may have also influenced Enzo’s approach to his business and personal life. Some suggest that it contributed to his intense focus on Ferrari’s success in racing and car manufacturing, possibly as a way to cope with his loss and continue the legacy that he and his son were so passionate about.
4. Privacy and Stoicism: Enzo Ferrari was known for being very private about his personal life. He rarely spoke publicly about his feelings, maintaining a stoic and focused persona, especially in professional settings. Therefore, much of what is known or inferred about his emotional state comes from his actions, such as the dedication of the Dino cars, rather than direct expressions of emotion.

In summary, while Enzo Ferrari was a reserved individual and not open about his personal feelings, the way he honored Dino’s memory through his actions speaks volumes about the depth of his love and the impact of his loss.

Dino Ferrari, the son of Enzo Ferrari, passed away at a young age due to a severe health condition. Born in 1932, Dino was diagnosed with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a progressive and debilitating neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, at the time, treatment options for this condition were extremely limited.

Dino’s illness and early death had a profound impact on Enzo Ferrari. Dino was deeply involved in the automotive world and had studied engineering with the intention of working in the family business. He is often credited with inspiring and contributing to the development of the famed “Dino” V6 engine, although how much he actually contributed is subject to debate.

In tribute to his son, Enzo Ferrari named the V6-engined line of Ferrari sports cars “Dino”. These cars were produced from 1968 to 1976 and are among some of the most revered Ferrari models. The Dino brand was a way for Enzo to commemorate his son and his contribution to the company, even though Dino Ferrari himself never saw the production of these cars.

Dino Ferrari died in 1956 at the age of 24. His legacy lives on in the Dino models and in the impact his life had on his father and the Ferrari company.