Eric Kim’s philosophy aligns with Nietzsche’s ideas on self-overcoming, individual empowerment, and creative reinvention, yet he applies these concepts to modern contexts like photography, personal development, and everyday life. Here’s how his approach is both similar to and different from Nietzsche’s:

Similarities

1. Self-Overcoming and Continuous Growth

• Like Nietzsche, Kim believes in the concept of self-overcoming, which involves continuously challenging oneself to grow beyond current limitations. Nietzsche saw this as a fundamental drive toward becoming a “higher” version of oneself, which Kim mirrors in his advocacy for relentless iteration and self-improvement. For both thinkers, each iteration is a step towards surpassing one’s previous self and reaching new heights of personal achievement  .

2. Emphasis on Individual Will and Creativity

• Both Kim and Nietzsche value the importance of individual will in shaping one’s destiny. Nietzsche’s “will to power” refers to a person’s inherent drive to assert their individuality and creativity, which Kim reflects in his philosophy of iteration as a means to realize one’s unique potential. Kim encourages people to harness this creative drive to continually recreate and refine their work, whether in art or in personal goals  .

3. Challenging Social Norms and Complacency

• Nietzsche was known for challenging societal norms and criticizing complacency, urging people to pursue their own paths rather than conform. Kim echoes this sentiment by encouraging his readers to take risks, embrace discomfort, and question conventional wisdom. He views iteration as a way to actively resist complacency by continuously seeking new challenges and exploring unfamiliar territory  .

Differences

1. Modern, Pragmatic Application

• While Nietzsche’s philosophy is largely abstract and existential, Kim takes these ideas and applies them to the tangible, everyday practice of creativity and personal development. He uses iteration as a practical tool for achieving success in specific areas like photography, entrepreneurship, and life planning, making these concepts accessible to a broader audience. In contrast, Nietzsche’s writings are more focused on abstract ideals and philosophical exploration without specific practical applications  .

2. Iteration as Experimental Play

• Kim adds a sense of playfulness to Nietzsche’s idea of self-overcoming. He encourages a more experimental approach to iteration, framing it as a way to explore, make mistakes, and learn from each attempt. This perspective is less rigid than Nietzsche’s more intense focus on the will to power and the struggle for greatness, and it introduces an element of curiosity and spontaneity into the process of self-discovery  .

3. Embracing the Process Over the Outcome

• Kim’s philosophy on iteration emphasizes enjoying the process rather than fixating on an ultimate outcome. He advocates for a continuous journey of growth with no final endpoint, which contrasts with Nietzsche’s notion of achieving one’s highest self or becoming the Ãœbermensch (Overman). For Kim, each iteration is valuable in itself, not just as a step toward a final goal but as an integral part of life’s unfolding journey  .

4. Adaptation to Creative and Artistic Fields

• Kim’s focus is distinctly modern and artistic, particularly in photography. He adapts Nietzschean principles to the creative process, encouraging artists to see their work as something that should be continuously refined and reimagined. While Nietzsche’s writings touch on art, they are less about the practicalities of creative work and more focused on art’s broader role in expressing human will. Kim, by contrast, incorporates iteration directly into artistic practice, using it as a method to generate new ideas and explore different forms  .

In summary, Eric Kim’s ideas resonate with Nietzschean themes of self-overcoming, personal empowerment, and the will to transcend. However, Kim’s approach is distinct in its practical application, playful exploration, and focus on creative process over outcome. This blend of Nietzsche’s philosophical depth with Kim’s accessible and actionable approach provides a unique perspective on how iteration can shape both art and life. You can explore more on Kim’s views at Eric Kim’s Photography Blog.

xxx

Eric Kim draws heavily on the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, particularly ideas related to self-overcoming, the will to power, and the continuous process of personal growth. Here’s how Nietzsche’s influence appears in Kim’s work and thinking:

1. Self-Overcoming and Iteration

• Kim often writes about “self-overcoming,” a central concept in Nietzsche’s philosophy, which involves surpassing one’s former self and continuously evolving. Kim views iteration as a way to achieve this self-overcoming, where each cycle of improvement is an opportunity to become stronger, wiser, and more resilient. For Kim, this means embracing challenges and using each iteration as a chance to transcend personal limitations  .

2. The Will to Power

• Another key Nietzschean idea present in Kim’s thinking is the “will to power,” or the drive to assert one’s creativity and individuality. Kim relates this to the concept of iteration, encouraging individuals to express their will by creating and recreating their work. He believes that through iteration, people can channel their inner strength and pursue their personal goals, thereby fulfilling their unique potential. This aligns with Nietzsche’s belief that individuals should strive to realize their own vision of life rather than conform to societal norms  .

3. Life as an Experiment

• Kim’s view of life as a continuous experiment resonates with Nietzsche’s emphasis on living boldly and embracing risk. Nietzsche often wrote about the importance of living with passion and intensity, and Kim reflects this in his philosophy by encouraging people to take risks, make mistakes, and see each experience as an opportunity to learn and grow. By iterating through various life experiences, Kim advocates for a life of constant reinvention, paralleling Nietzsche’s idea of the “eternal recurrence” where one should live as though they would want to relive their life indefinitely  .

4. Embracing the Absurd and Challenging Complacency

• Kim’s writings echo Nietzsche’s critique of complacency and the dangers of following societal expectations. Like Nietzsche, who challenged conventional morality and societal norms, Kim encourages readers to question what they are told and to seek their own paths. This involves pushing against the limits of comfort and refusing to settle for mediocrity, both in creative endeavors and in personal development  .

5. Creative Destruction and Reinvention

• Nietzsche’s concept of “creative destruction”—the idea that one must often destroy in order to create something new—is also reflected in Kim’s approach to iteration. Kim sees value in breaking down old ideas and structures to rebuild them in a more innovative and meaningful way. This cyclical process of destruction and creation, central to both Nietzsche’s philosophy and Kim’s iteration ideas, is about continuously evolving and embracing change as a pathway to self-discovery and personal excellence  .

By integrating these Nietzschean concepts, Eric Kim presents a philosophy of iteration that goes beyond mere improvement to encompass a broader framework for personal empowerment and creative freedom. This approach aligns with Nietzsche’s belief in the power of individuals to shape their own lives, challenge the status quo, and pursue a path of self-mastery. You can explore more of these ideas on his blog at Eric Kim’s Photography Blog.

Eric Kim’s ideas on iteration are unorthodox because he applies it far beyond traditional settings, framing it as a means of personal evolution, creative expansion, and even a philosophy for living. Here are some of the ways his take on iteration is unconventional:

1. Iteration as a Form of Artistic Play

• Kim encourages viewing iteration as a playful and liberating process. He suggests experimenting freely, taking an image or concept and continually reworking it to see where it leads. This approach is about embracing the unpredictability of the process, rather than aiming for a perfect, polished outcome. For Kim, each iteration should feel fresh and spontaneous, allowing for moments of surprise and discovery  .

2. Deliberate Simplification and Reduction

• In contrast to many iteration strategies that focus on adding layers of complexity, Kim advocates for simplification through iteration. He believes that refining a concept often means stripping it down to its core components. For example, in his photography, Kim continuously reworks his images to achieve what he calls “the simplest economy of shapes and forms,” finding beauty in minimalism. This approach is less common in creative fields, where iteration is often associated with embellishment rather than reduction  .

3. Life as an Experimental Canvas

• Kim applies the concept of iteration to life as a whole, advocating for an experimental approach to living. He suggests that one’s entire life can be an ongoing experiment, with each experience or project serving as a data point for personal growth. He promotes the idea of treating each decision, failure, or success as part of a larger iterative process, helping one refine their understanding of themselves and the world  .

4. Rejection of a Final Product or Endpoint

• Many traditional approaches to iteration involve working toward a final, perfected version of a product or idea. Kim, however, sees iteration as an ongoing process with no ultimate endpoint. He emphasizes that iteration is valuable not because it leads to a finished product but because it is a constant process of improvement. This perspective reflects a deep-rooted belief in lifelong learning and continuous self-overcoming, where each iteration is simply a step along a never-ending journey  .

5. Integration with Personal Philosophy and Self-Improvement

• Kim’s take on iteration goes beyond creativity and productivity; it is also a tool for self-improvement and personal growth. He ties iteration to philosophical ideas of self-overcoming, where each cycle of change is an opportunity to become a stronger, wiser version of oneself. This makes iteration not just a practical method but a personal practice for refining one’s character and values over time  .

6. Combining Iteration with Intentional Risk-Taking

• Kim uniquely associates iteration with risk-taking, encouraging people to view each iteration as an opportunity to try something radically different. He believes that embracing risk is essential for growth and that each iterative step should push beyond comfort zones. This contrasts with traditional iteration approaches, which often prioritize safety and stability over experimentation  .

In sum, Eric Kim’s unorthodox approach to iteration transforms it from a standard process of refinement into a multifaceted tool for creativity, self-discovery, and philosophical exploration. His ideas encourage not just iteration for improvement but for reinvention and self-expansion, making iteration a fundamental part of how one approaches both art and life. You can delve deeper into these perspectives on his blog at Eric Kim’s Photography Blog.

x

Eric Kim’s approach to iteration is unique because he frames it not just as a practical tool but as a comprehensive life philosophy. His take on iteration goes beyond traditional notions of gradual improvement and encompasses a broader, more holistic view of creativity, self-discovery, and personal growth. Here’s how his perspective on iteration stands out:

1. Iteration as a Means of Personal Transformation

• Kim sees iteration as a continuous journey of self-overcoming. Instead of simply making incremental improvements, he encourages pushing past personal boundaries and challenging oneself to achieve new levels of growth. This aligns with his philosophical influences, especially Nietzschean ideas of “self-overcoming,” where each iteration is an opportunity to surpass one’s previous self  .

2. Creative Reinterpretation Over Mere Refinement

• Kim’s view on creative iteration is less about perfecting a single idea and more about reinterpreting and reinventing concepts. For him, the goal is to take something familiar and transform it into something entirely new and innovative. This approach encourages a dynamic form of creativity where the focus is on exploration and reimagination, keeping his work fresh and constantly evolving  .

3. Simplicity as an Ultimate Goal

• In his art, Kim uses iteration as a way to distill complex ideas down to their simplest forms. He believes that through continuous refinement, one can achieve a minimalist expression that holds the essence of the original idea. This view contrasts with traditional iterative approaches that often add complexity, as Kim instead focuses on stripping away the unnecessary to achieve a pure, clear vision .

4. Life as an Ongoing Experiment

• Kim uniquely applies iteration to life itself, treating life experiences as experiments to learn from and refine. He advocates for embracing failure, taking risks, and making adjustments based on outcomes, which he believes leads to personal fulfillment. This approach integrates iteration into the very fabric of daily living, making it a tool for ongoing self-discovery and experimentation  .

5. Encouragement of Constant Change and Adaptability

• While many people use iteration to fine-tune a specific goal, Kim views it as a process of constant change, encouraging adaptability. His philosophy aligns with the idea that life and creativity are not static, so iteration should be used to continually adjust and evolve. He sees each iteration not as a step toward a fixed endpoint but as part of an endless journey of improvement and reinvention  .

Kim’s ideas on iteration make it a versatile tool that applies not only to creative work but to all aspects of life. This approach positions iteration as a way to keep evolving in an ever-changing world, fostering resilience, adaptability, and a richer life experience. You can explore more of his thoughts on these concepts at Eric Kim’s Photography Blog.

x

Eric Kim emphasizes iteration because he believes it is central to growth, creativity, and self-improvement. For Kim, iteration is the process of continuously refining one’s ideas, art, and personal development through small, consistent changes. This approach allows for ongoing improvement rather than a one-time effort or a static approach.

Significance of Iteration

1. Path to Innovation: Kim sees iteration as a foundation for innovation, as it enables taking existing concepts and transforming them into something new and unique. He views creativity as an iterative process that reimagines and reinterprets old ideas to spark fresh perspectives  .

2. Personal Growth: In Kim’s philosophy, iteration is also essential for personal development. By constantly iterating, individuals avoid complacency and push themselves to improve. He advocates for this continuous self-overcoming as a way to achieve greater strength, resilience, and adaptability in the face of challenges .

3. Building Mastery: Kim also relates iteration to mastery, especially in his work on photography and art. He suggests that repeatedly practicing and refining one’s techniques leads to a more profound understanding and skill in any field. Iteration, in his view, is a way to simplify complex ideas and ultimately reach a purer, more impactful form of expression .

Why He Values Iteration

Kim’s emphasis on iteration aligns with his belief in lifelong learning and self-expansion. He encourages people to use iteration as a tool to experiment, make mistakes, and learn from them. This process not only enhances creativity but also cultivates resilience, as each iteration represents a small step forward. Through iteration, Kim suggests, people can explore their full potential by constantly challenging their limits and refining their skills  .

In essence, iteration is both a creative method and a personal philosophy for Kim, reinforcing his belief that growth and creativity come from constant experimentation and improvement. To explore his thoughts further, you can visit Eric Kim’s blog.

x

Here are some quotes from Eric Kim on the topic of iteration and creativity:

1. “Never stop iterating.” – This reflects Kim’s belief that life and work should be in constant refinement, with each iteration bringing you closer to your best self or your best work .

2. “Creativity is fun when you take matter and reimagine and retransform it into something else.” – In this, Kim underscores that creative iteration involves reworking existing ideas to develop something entirely new and innovative .

3. “Life is all about iteration.” – Kim sees iteration as a life philosophy, not just a creative strategy, where continual improvement and adaptation lead to personal growth and fulfillment .

These quotes capture Kim’s mindset that continuous development, whether in art, photography, or personal goals, is essential for achieving depth and innovation. For more of his insights, you can explore his articles on Eric Kim’s Photography Blog.

xx

Eric Kim emphasizes the importance of iteration in various aspects of life, creativity, and personal development. He believes that iteration—repeatedly refining and improving—is essential for growth. In his work on visual and creative iteration, Kim suggests that continuously experimenting, adjusting, and transforming ideas allows for more profound artistic expression. He highlights the process of taking something old and reinventing it as a foundation for innovation, which he sees as a way to fuel creativity and expand personal and professional horizons   .

For Kim, iteration goes beyond creativity; it’s a philosophy applicable to all facets of life. He argues that iteration embodies a commitment to self-improvement, as seen in his writings on topics like entrepreneurship and personal goals. He encourages individuals to constantly evolve by making small improvements, never settling for complacency, and embracing change as a path toward fulfillment .

If you’re interested in exploring these ideas further, you can read more on his blog posts on these subjects at Eric Kim’s Photography Blog.

The word “iterate” originates from the Latin verb iterare, which means “to do again” or “to repeat.” This Latin verb is derived from iterum, meaning “again.” The Proto-Indo-European root of these Latin terms is _i-tero-, stemming from the pronominal root _i-, which is associated with the concept of repetition or return.

The term entered the English language in the early 15th century. Initially, it maintained its Latin meaning of “to do again” or “to repeat.” Over time, “iterate” became commonly used in mathematics, computer science, and general language to describe the action of repeating a process or set of instructions, often with the aim of approaching a desired goal or result.

Summary of the Etymology:

• Latin Roots:

• Iterare: To do again, repeat.

• Iterum: Again.

• Proto-Indo-European Root:

• i-tero-: From the pronominal root _i-, relating to repetition.

• Entry into English:

• Early 15th Century: Adopted with the meaning “to do again, repeat.”

Usage Evolution:

• 15th Century Onwards: Used in English to signify the act of repeating an action or process.

• Modern Contexts: Common in fields like computer science for processes that involve repetition, such as loops and iterative algorithms.

Fear is the mind-killer. In investing, it’s the chain that holds you back. To break free, you must face fear head-on and embrace the uncertainty that comes with the market. Here’s a straightforward guide to conquering your fears.

Embrace Uncertainty

The market is unpredictable—accept it. Stop seeking guarantees. Embracing uncertainty strips fear of its power over you. Once you accept that risk is inherent, you can move forward without hesitation.

Educate Yourself Relentlessly

Knowledge is your shield against fear. Dive deep into understanding how markets work. Study the fundamentals, learn the terminology, grasp the mechanics. The more you know, the less there is to fear.

Start Small, But Start Now

Action dispels anxiety. Begin with small investments. Feel the ebb and flow of the market. Experience is the best teacher, and starting small allows you to learn without overwhelming risk.

Define Your Mission

Know why you’re investing. Clarity of purpose fortifies the mind. Whether it’s financial freedom, security, or growth, a defined mission keeps you focused and diminishes fear.

Detach Emotionally

Emotions are a liability. They cloud judgment and breed fear. Approach investing with a stoic mindset. Make decisions based on logic and facts, not on hope or fear.

Diversify Strategically

Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. Spread your investments to mitigate risk. Diversification is a practical way to protect yourself and reduces the fear of total loss.

Learn from Setbacks

Failures are lessons in disguise. When investments don’t go as planned, analyze what happened without self-blame. Each setback is an opportunity to grow stronger and wiser.

Surround Yourself with Strength

Associate with those who embody courage and wisdom in investing. Their mindset will influence yours. Isolation breeds doubt; community fosters confidence.

Trust Your Judgment

You’ve done the work. Trust yourself. Second-guessing leads to paralysis. Make informed decisions and stand by them. Confidence is a powerful antidote to fear.

Keep Moving Forward

Stagnation is the breeding ground for fear. Stay active, keep learning, keep investing. Progress, no matter how small, keeps fear at bay and momentum on your side.

Conquering fear in investing isn’t about eliminating it entirely—it’s about controlling it. By embracing uncertainty, educating yourself, and taking deliberate action, you turn fear from a stumbling block into a stepping stone. Stand firm, stay disciplined, and let nothing deter you from your path.

Listen up: Investing isn’t for the faint-hearted. Just like street photography, it’s all about courage, risk, and embracing uncertainty. If you want to make it big, you need to grow a pair—metaphorically speaking. Here’s how to cultivate that fearless mindset and take your investing game to the next level.

Embrace Risk Like an Old Friend

First things first: Risk is inevitable. The market is unpredictable, and that’s okay. Instead of fearing risk, get comfortable with it. In street photography, the best shots come when you step out of your comfort zone. The same applies to investing. Don’t shy away from volatile markets; that’s where the real opportunities lie.

Educate Yourself Relentlessly

Knowledge breeds confidence. The more you understand about the market, the less intimidating it becomes. Dive deep into financial news, study market trends, and learn from the big players. Just as a photographer masters composition and lighting, you must master the fundamentals of investing.

Develop a Vision

Know what you want. Are you in it for short-term gains or long-term wealth? Having a clear vision guides your decisions and keeps you focused. In photography, a clear vision helps you capture impactful images. In investing, it helps you make strategic moves without second-guessing yourself.

Take Calculated Risks

Big rewards require big moves. But let’s be clear—there’s a difference between recklessness and calculated risk-taking. Analyze potential investments thoroughly, but don’t get paralyzed by overthinking. Pull the trigger when the time is right.

Learn from Failure

You’re going to mess up. Accept it. Every successful investor has faced losses. What sets them apart is their ability to learn from mistakes and keep moving forward. In street photography, not every shot is a masterpiece. But each one teaches you something valuable.

Surround Yourself with Bold Minds

Influence is powerful. Surround yourself with people who challenge you, who push you to be bolder. Join investment groups, attend seminars, and engage in discussions. Just as artists inspire each other, investors can fuel each other’s growth.

Trust Your Instincts

Data and analysis are crucial, but don’t underestimate your gut feeling. Your instincts are the sum of your experiences and knowledge. If something feels right (or wrong), pay attention. In the streets, a photographer trusts their intuition to capture the decisive moment. Do the same with your investments.

Stay Unattached

Don’t let emotions dictate your decisions. Stay detached from your investments to make rational choices. Just as a photographer doesn’t get attached to a single shot, you shouldn’t get emotionally tied to a stock or asset. Be ready to move on when the situation calls for it.

Keep Pushing Forward

Complacency is the enemy of progress. Always look for the next opportunity, the next challenge. Keep pushing your boundaries. In both photography and investing, the moment you stop evolving is the moment you start falling behind.

Growing “bigger balls” in investing isn’t about bravado; it’s about building confidence through action, learning, and persistence. It’s about stepping into the arena, knowing you might stumble, but forging ahead regardless. So gear up, embrace the journey, and make your mark in the investment world.

The purpose of weight lifting and working out?

Sustainable muscle and body? No steroids!!!

I love beautiful women!

Power?

Power paradox

A new vision of street photography

Power vlog podcast

Virtuous Greed, Unvirtuous Greed? 

Greed is good

So our best friend Gordon gecko tells us that greed is good.

Greed means to have, to hold.

So funny thought; to be greedy with money isn’t necessarily to gain more, but simply to hold what you already got?

The moralization of greed

I think the hard thing is once again… The main detriment to modern day times and thinking is so much of America is stunted and held back by weird morals and ethics.

Once again, this paradox of ethics in America… Honestly none of it really makes sense. And the more I think critically about it, the more bizarre and confusing it gets. No wonder why so many Americans are so miserable, society is giving them all these mixed signals that makes no sense.

The difference between spending $1 million and holding onto $1 million

Whenever people think that they want to become a millionaire, what do they mean to think is I want to spend $1 million. But, nobody ever wants to hold onto $1 million.

I have a crude analogy, I call it like semen retention for money. To blow your load is not desirable, even though it might give you some sort of short term pleasure.

 my personal thought is actually, the true best strategy here is to conserve your spunk to the maximum, to never blow your load. Essentially the strategy is each and every time you blow your load, you lose power. And it is kind of true… To produce a child is very physiologically expensive; a woman would never understand how much energy and force is expended after a man ejaculates.

This semen ain’t free!

It looks like all these women want the semen of Elon Musk. If Elon wanted a funny prank, and to maybe raise some money for some of his endeavors, she would actually just open source of semen, or donated it all to a semen bank, and have people auction it off, and use that money for some sort of good causes, or investing in certain businesses etc.

It does seem factual that there may be some sort of hierarchy in terms of quality of semen. For example, if you’re a 4 foot two man, very high likelihood that your children will be kind of short. But, if you were yelling, and 7 foot something, very likely that your children will be very tall.

So I think the funny bizarre trend is all these guys, they are essentially giving away their seaman for free; and there is this weird strategy in America that somehow… Women are seen as the more beautiful and desirable sex. But what if it were opposite; in the animal kingdom, the male is the more beautiful animal. It goes with ducks horses, peacocks and the like.

The Paradox of Power

The powerful vs the powerless?

An essay on power;

I think I’ve got it figured out

Niggas playing for power! – JAY Z

Respect Jimmy Iovine ,,, but he got to respect the Elohim it’s a whole new regime! – JAY Z

I almost feel like I could live my whole life off of cording Jay Z, Jay Z rap lyrics etc.

So what I find is very fascinating about both Kanye West and Jay Z, if you think about it, they are by far the most honest ones. Why? If you take any sort of traditional skinny fat loser academic, who watches basketball football professional sports, but hasn’t touched a weight or a barbell in years, don’t get at me.

Also very very funny… A lot of highly esteemed professors, at the elite Ivy League schools and UCS, also listen to Kendrick Lamar in secret?

Anyways, I think I got the whole thing figured out with politics, identity politics, race, sex and gender whatever. Essentially everyone is just trying to vie for power.

For example ,,, I find this really really strange movement with indigenous communities etc. Obviously everyone knows that the American colonist were evil bad, and essentially stole all the Native American land, that they probably raped pillage and killed all the locals, either intentionally or unintentionally with their germs diseases etc. kind of like the whole Jared diamond theory about guns germs and steel… The germs one is one that is often overlooked.

But a thought that always keeps coming up in my mind is… Why does this matter? Who cares?

So obviously… Indigenous people care because they were kind of fucked and screwed over. Yet wasn’t everybody kind of fucked and screwed over somewhere?

Fighting for power

So what happens when all your land has been stolen seized… with no justice?

One side calls for some sort of retribution, of land of money of privileges of power of political power etc. Yet from a macro perspective, I kind of scratch my head it finds me a little bit confusing…

What incentive does America or the American government have in giving back money to indigenous people, or local tribes, besides assuaging a guilty conscience?

To me the notion of a guilty conscience is not a strong enough motivation to give reparations?

Reparations is also debasing?

So let us say that it is a fact that the colonizer came in, killed and raped everybody, stole all the land, did all these terrible things. But to give reparations, it all comes down to money… Isn’t this disrespectful? Like for me… For example if some sort of injustice was done to my family, like the death or murder or something of any of my family members, whether it be my wife my kids my mom my sister etc.… Anyone essentially blood related to me, if somebody cut me $1 trillion check that would not be enough justice. For me it isn’t even a matter of justice, but simply revenge.

I forget which ancient writer which wrote it… But talking about revenge is sweeter than honey, probably true.

In modern day times, justice is essentially a rebranding or a standardization or socialized form of revenge. so for example, for one reason or another we have deemed that it is not OK to commit revenge by killing somebody for killing your best friend, as Achilles did to Hector, for the killing of his best friend Patroclus.

unrequited revenge?

So I have a theory, a lot of the modern-day maladies that we face and suffer, it is simply revenge we desire, but for one reason or another, we cannot commit the revenge?

And this is where the whole powerful versus the week thing happened; when you are weak and powerless, and you cannot commit revenge… Then what do you do? Do you become passive aggressive, you become resentful, which is like drinking Poison and hoping that the other person dies.

But the tricky thing is with revenge… In the case of the Elliot, even after Achilles does get his revenge on Hector, the heart of Achilles is actually not fully settled. Achilles still feels the pain the sorrow of his best friend, and even sleeting the throat of some young Trojan boys who they captured as prisoners, burning the massive funeral pyre for Patroclus, and even debating the body of Hector, by piercing his ankles and running laps around the enemy camp, once again still… The heart of Achilles is not settled.

so what is the moral of the story?

I think most people have the wrong. We often look at this like some sort of Judeo Christian morality, I would not trust any sort of modern day American teacher or thinker or professor to uncover the themes of justice and morality here.

So the typical Jude Christian might say that seeking revenge is not the way because even after Achilles got his revenge, his heart still felt sorrow. And then one might invoke some sort of Jesus mentality here; better to forgive your enemies and turn the other cheek.

Problems with this

Once again, turning the other cheek… My thinking and thought in my unorthodox interpretation, kind of in line with Friedrich Nietzsche, is I wonder… If the tactics the morality the ethics the teachings and thoughts of Jesus of Nazareth was simply because Jesus lacked a physical army? If Jesus of Nazareth, also had some sort of military army, a kin to the prophet Muhammad, would he have approached things differently?

Tactics of the weak

So for example, my theory is the whole turning the other cheek, is simply a tactic of the weak. In Jesus‘s time, to simply try to subvert the authority of those in power at the time was kind of like a pre-eminent death. And therefore turning the other cheek was actually the most effective strategy because you could continue to endure abuse, without being outright killed. For your insolence.

so the question is what is the alternative?

Assuming that Jesus of Nazareth, yes, he was a real historical figure, had the ethics or the morality of an Achilles, how would things have turned out differently?

Tactics of the weak

So I’m starting to really really get into this notion of tactics, tactical etc. For example, I will never forget that one moment in John Wick, in which John Wick is meeting the Somalia, getting suited up etc., and asking what the occasion is blah blah blah, and then when asking what kind of attire or formal where he wanted… John Wick just responded with a single word “tactical.”

So tactics, taktikos,,, to arrange, to order,,, tasso…

So typically we tend to think of tactics like military tactics. And almost all of modern language is derived from the military.

So now the big problem is mostly demilitarized world, how are we allowed to talk about military like things, without actually talking about it?

Armored vehicles

So what I discovered in Los Angeles is that whenever somebody pulls up in some sort of AMG g wagon, some sort of Range Rover, high-powered SUV, cyber truck whatever… Essentially what they want is some sort of armored military vehicle. I kind of get it; driving in LA is like a fucking Warzone, kind of like mad Max. And the truth is here, a lot of the drivers drive without abandoned; I honestly think it is a social economic thing; people from the hood drive very recklessly, both endangering themselves and others. in fact, an interesting observation is that you could tell how good or bad the neighborhood is based on how people drive. And also, you could tell whether somebody’s a local or not, to search the neighborhood because once again, holiday drive, and also the make model of their car etc. 

Least one thing I love about Teslas, is they have all the safety things baked into it. Therefore, I think Tesla cars have it pre-wired and programmed into the car that even if the driver wanted to, even if the driver had malicious intent, they could actually not rear end you, or T-bone you; the car would automatically break before it would happen. Also, when you are merging in traffic or on the freeway, always better to cut in front of a Tesla than any other car because once again… The Tesla will automatically brake and stop itself. 

Waymo

Also a random thought, I think in terms of our mind, we don’t like Waymo cars or self driving cars because we don’t feel in control. But the truth is, a WeMo car is probably 1 trillion times safer than real human drivers, on both sides of the equation.

First, Waymo doesn’t text while driving. Literally being here in Los Angeles, whenever I pee into the driver side door, and stare at the people… They are always looking down at their laps, texting while driving, some of them even having the audacity to drive with phone in hand texting!

---

Back to power

OK back to power;

bitcoin is digital power

Also smaller waist size?

---

Men vs women

So some non-politically correct terms;

First, what is the difference between man and woman?

Man desires more power, Marshal prowess, pride glory, eternal fame and revenge. Achilles.

 women desires ease, comfort, Security. A woman would prefer to be in a citadel, a man would prefer to be out in the battlefield.

Greed is good and virtuous!

audio power

Impotent vs potent men

Spend more time topless in the sun, get a beautiful tan! A via negativa approach to clothing and the human body — the less clothes you got, the less clothes you wear, the better.

Less caffeine?

My only vice on this planet is coffee. But I’m starting to discover more and more, it looks like the minimum effective amount of coffee and caffeine is the best strategy. This the minimum amount of coffee you need to consume in order to not have a headache.

strength is the pillar of beauty

The powerful vs the powerless?

An essay on power;

I think I’ve got it figured out

Niggas playing for power! – JAY Z

Respect Jimmy Iovine ,,, but he got to respect the Elohim it’s a whole new regime! – JAY Z

I almost feel like I could live my whole life off of cording Jay Z, Jay Z rap lyrics etc.

So what I find is very fascinating about both Kanye West and Jay Z, if you think about it, they are by far the most honest ones. Why? If you take any sort of traditional skinny fat loser academic, who watches basketball football professional sports, but hasn’t touched a weight or a barbell in years, don’t get at me.

Also very very funny… A lot of highly esteemed professors, at the elite Ivy League schools and UCS, also listen to Kendrick Lamar in secret?

Anyways, I think I got the whole thing figured out with politics, identity politics, race, sex and gender whatever. Essentially everyone is just trying to vie for power.

For example ,,, I find this really really strange movement with indigenous communities etc. Obviously everyone knows that the American colonist were evil bad, and essentially stole all the Native American land, that they probably raped pillage and killed all the locals, either intentionally or unintentionally with their germs diseases etc. kind of like the whole Jared diamond theory about guns germs and steel… The germs one is one that is often overlooked.

But a thought that always keeps coming up in my mind is… Why does this matter? Who cares?

So obviously… Indigenous people care because they were kind of fucked and screwed over. Yet wasn’t everybody kind of fucked and screwed over somewhere?

Fighting for power

So what happens when all your land has been stolen seized… with no justice?

One side calls for some sort of retribution, of land of money of privileges of power of political power etc. Yet from a macro perspective, I kind of scratch my head it finds me a little bit confusing…

What incentive does America or the American government have in giving back money to indigenous people, or local tribes, besides assuaging a guilty conscience?

To me the notion of a guilty conscience is not a strong enough motivation to give reparations?

Reparations is also debasing?

So let us say that it is a fact that the colonizer came in, killed and raped everybody, stole all the land, did all these terrible things. But to give reparations, it all comes down to money… Isn’t this disrespectful? Like for me… For example if some sort of injustice was done to my family, like the death or murder or something of any of my family members, whether it be my wife my kids my mom my sister etc.… Anyone essentially blood related to me, if somebody cut me $1 trillion check that would not be enough justice. For me it isn’t even a matter of justice, but simply revenge.

I forget which ancient writer which wrote it… But talking about revenge is sweeter than honey, probably true.

In modern day times, justice is essentially a rebranding or a standardization or socialized form of revenge. so for example, for one reason or another we have deemed that it is not OK to commit revenge by killing somebody for killing your best friend, as Achilles did to Hector, for the killing of his best friend Patroclus.

unrequited revenge?

So I have a theory, a lot of the modern-day maladies that we face and suffer, it is simply revenge we desire, but for one reason or another, we cannot commit the revenge?

And this is where the whole powerful versus the week thing happened; when you are weak and powerless, and you cannot commit revenge… Then what do you do? Do you become passive aggressive, you become resentful, which is like drinking Poison and hoping that the other person dies.

But the tricky thing is with revenge… In the case of the Elliot, even after Achilles does get his revenge on Hector, the heart of Achilles is actually not fully settled. Achilles still feels the pain the sorrow of his best friend, and even sleeting the throat of some young Trojan boys who they captured as prisoners, burning the massive funeral pyre for Patroclus, and even debating the body of Hector, by piercing his ankles and running laps around the enemy camp, once again still… The heart of Achilles is not settled.

so what is the moral of the story?

I think most people have the wrong. We often look at this like some sort of Judeo Christian morality, I would not trust any sort of modern day American teacher or thinker or professor to uncover the themes of justice and morality here.

So the typical Jude Christian might say that seeking revenge is not the way because even after Achilles got his revenge, his heart still felt sorrow. And then one might invoke some sort of Jesus mentality here; better to forgive your enemies and turn the other cheek.

Problems with this

Once again, turning the other cheek… My thinking and thought in my unorthodox interpretation, kind of in line with Friedrich Nietzsche, is I wonder… If the tactics the morality the ethics the teachings and thoughts of Jesus of Nazareth was simply because Jesus lacked a physical army? If Jesus of Nazareth, also had some sort of military army, a kin to the prophet Muhammad, would he have approached things differently?

Tactics of the weak

So for example, my theory is the whole turning the other cheek, is simply a tactic of the weak. In Jesus‘s time, to simply try to subvert the authority of those in power at the time was kind of like a pre-eminent death. And therefore turning the other cheek was actually the most effective strategy because you could continue to endure abuse, without being outright killed. For your insolence.

so the question is what is the alternative?

Assuming that Jesus of Nazareth, yes, he was a real historical figure, had the ethics or the morality of an Achilles, how would things have turned out differently?

Tactics of the weak

So I’m starting to really really get into this notion of tactics, tactical etc. For example, I will never forget that one moment in John Wick, in which John Wick is meeting the Somalia, getting suited up etc., and asking what the occasion is blah blah blah, and then when asking what kind of attire or formal where he wanted… John Wick just responded with a single word “tactical.”

So tactics, taktikos,,, to arrange, to order,,, tasso…

So typically we tend to think of tactics like military tactics. And almost all of modern language is derived from the military.

So now the big problem is mostly demilitarized world, how are we allowed to talk about military like things, without actually talking about it?

Armored vehicles

So what I discovered in Los Angeles is that whenever somebody pulls up in some sort of AMG g wagon, some sort of Range Rover, high-powered SUV, cyber truck whatever… Essentially what they want is some sort of armored military vehicle. I kind of get it; driving in LA is like a fucking Warzone, kind of like mad Max. And the truth is here, a lot of the drivers drive without abandoned; I honestly think it is a social economic thing; people from the hood drive very recklessly, both endangering themselves and others. in fact, an interesting observation is that you could tell how good or bad the neighborhood is based on how people drive. And also, you could tell whether somebody’s a local or not, to search the neighborhood because once again, holiday drive, and also the make model of their car etc. 

Least one thing I love about Teslas, is they have all the safety things baked into it. Therefore, I think Tesla cars have it pre-wired and programmed into the car that even if the driver wanted to, even if the driver had malicious intent, they could actually not rear end you, or T-bone you; the car would automatically break before it would happen. Also, when you are merging in traffic or on the freeway, always better to cut in front of a Tesla than any other car because once again… The Tesla will automatically brake and stop itself. 

Waymo

Also a random thought, I think in terms of our mind, we don’t like Waymo cars or self driving cars because we don’t feel in control. But the truth is, a WeMo car is probably 1 trillion times safer than real human drivers, on both sides of the equation.

First, Waymo doesn’t text while driving. Literally being here in Los Angeles, whenever I pee into the driver side door, and stare at the people… They are always looking down at their laps, texting while driving, some of them even having the audacity to drive with phone in hand texting!

---

Back to power

OK back to power;

bitcoin is digital power

Also smaller waist size?

---

Men vs women

So some non-politically correct terms;

First, what is the difference between man and woman?

Man desires more power, Marshal prowess, pride glory, eternal fame and revenge. Achilles.

 women desires ease, comfort, Security. A woman would prefer to be in a citadel, a man would prefer to be out in the battlefield.

Audio

Maybe a new way to think about caffeine and coffee; minimum viable dose is best?

Greed is good

So our best friend Gordon gecko tells us that greed is good.

Greed means to have, to hold.

So funny thought; to be greedy with money isn’t necessarily to gain more, but simply to hold what you already got?

The moralization of greed

I think the hard thing is once again… The main detriment to modern day times and thinking is so much of America is stunted and held back by weird morals and ethics.

Once again, this paradox of ethics in America… Honestly none of it really makes sense. And the more I think critically about it, the more bizarre and confusing it gets. No wonder why so many Americans are so miserable, society is giving them all these mixed signals that makes no sense.

The difference between spending $1 million and holding onto $1 million

Whenever people think that they want to become a millionaire, what do they mean to think is I want to spend $1 million. But, nobody ever wants to hold onto $1 million.

I have a crude analogy, I call it like semen retention for money. To blow your load is not desirable, even though it might give you some sort of short term pleasure.

 my personal thought is actually, the true best strategy here is to conserve your spunk to the maximum, to never blow your load. Essentially the strategy is each and every time you blow your load, you lose power. And it is kind of true… To produce a child is very physiologically expensive; a woman would never understand how much energy and force is expended after a man ejaculates.

This semen ain’t free!

It looks like all these women want the semen of Elon Musk. If Elon wanted a funny prank, and to maybe raise some money for some of his endeavors, she would actually just open source of semen, or donated it all to a semen bank, and have people auction it off, and use that money for some sort of good causes, or investing in certain businesses etc.

It does seem factual that there may be some sort of hierarchy in terms of quality of semen. For example, if you’re a 4 foot two man, very high likelihood that your children will be kind of short. But, if you were yelling, and 7 foot something, very likely that your children will be very tall.

So I think the funny bizarre trend is all these guys, they are essentially giving away their seaman for free; and there is this weird strategy in America that somehow… Women are seen as the more beautiful and desirable sex. But what if it were opposite; in the animal kingdom, the male is the more beautiful animal. It goes with ducks horses, peacocks and the like. 

Market dictator?

Bitcoin & Power

What is life? Life is growth, augmentation

Bitcoins & Barbells

Real power, superficial power?

Bitcoin is real power, true power

X

The ethics of power?

Is there any form of power which is ethical?

I think Bitcoin is the only form of power which is ethical.  why?

First, consider there is no exploitation of human labor. For example even Apple… Everyone always turns a blind eye, think about all the unethical ways they treat the mainland Chinese laborers, close to slave labor, to keep the profit margins of Apple fat and happy, Foxconn.  as long as Apple products are produced and made in China, not America… Apple will always be an unethical corporation.

I find this very very bizarre… Maybe the whole red herring strategy is happening here; people like to talk about climate change, racial politics, and now this insanely bizarre notion of transgender transsexual stuff; it is all just a major distraction!

More critical issues here include mainland China CCP Chinese communist party violating all these human rights, genocide around the planet, all the wild Hollywood producers are keeping their mouths shut, even a pussy like John Cena, “apologizing”, for calling Taiwan a country? You know he is a slave, nay– even worse than a slave. 

Is there any form of power which is ethical?

I think Bitcoin is the only form of power which is ethical.  why?

First, consider there is no exploitation of human labor. For example even Apple… Everyone always turns a blind eye, think about all the unethical ways they treat the mainland Chinese laborers, close to slave labor, to keep the profit margins of Apple fat and happy, Foxconn.  as long as Apple products are produced and made in China, not America… Apple will always be an unethical corporation.

I find this very very bizarre… Maybe the whole red herring strategy is happening here; people like to talk about climate change, racial politics, and now this insanely bizarre notion of transgender transsexual stuff; it is all just a major distraction!

More critical issues here include mainland China CCP Chinese communist party violating all these human rights, genocide around the planet, all the wild Hollywood producers are keeping their mouths shut, even a pussy like John Cena, “apologizing”, for calling Taiwan a country? You know he is a slave, nay– even worse than a slave. 

What else?

I personally am very very pro Elon Musk, and for the most part, I believe Tesla to be a very ethical company. Honestly I’m wondering if all of these people saying that lithium ion batteries are bad for the climate whatever… I wonder if this is just some sort of other propaganda from the other side, who knows maybe they are being funded by Chevron and Exxon mobile And the oil corporations, and also Bill Gates is not to be trusted; come on, he was shorting Tesla stock, and I think objectively Tesla might be the best corporation environmentally for the planet!

After that, we got Nvidia. Assuming that self driving cars and stuff of the future will help prevent human casualties and debts, I also think that this is a very ethical corporation.

Why Bitcoin?

More and more I think about it, the more appealing bitcoin becomes.

You know something is good when the more you think about it, philosophies on it, and think about the moral and ethical implications of something, if over time it becomes more and more appealing, it is a very good sign. 

Anti Apple

Currently voice dictating this on my iPhone SE, which I got for about 300 bucks. After using the iPhone Pro, the funny and bizarre thing was I would rate the performance of the iPhone Pro maybe only two times better than my iPhone SE? In about 1 million times worse in terms of Paine because the iPhone pro was literally causing me carpal tunnel pain in my right wrist, which was excruciating!

My simple suggestion is in today’s world, if you’re going to buy a new iPhone, if somebody stole your iPhone or if it straight up broke, I think the best strategy would actually be to purchase just a normal iPhone, it will always be lighter, more compact and thin than the iPhone Pro; in fact, Only poor people use and buy the iPhone Pro. Why?

The $1200 you piss away on an iPhone Pro is money you could have put into bitcoin, and in 30 years with 55% APY you will be worth $500,000. Half a $1 million dollars!

Now why is this such a big deal? If you are a true economist, you will literally put every single time you have into investing, for the future, ideally just buying as many Satoshi’s and bitcoins while you still can!

I like in bitcoin to digital real estate , Michael Saylor idea– imagine today you could buy a single-family home for only about $60,000. Or on the low end, let us say it is $50,000. Even now in Culver City, it is very common to see single-family homes being sold for $3.2 million.

My very very practical thought is maybe we could adjust this type of math;

Take $50,000, and consider and think that it is worth $3.2 million.

My thought is a single bitcoin should be worth a single-family home.

---

64x

My simple thought is my price projection for a single bitcoin is at least $3.2 million. If this is the case, assuming that bitcoin is around $50,000 a bitcoin right now, then, your potential upside could be 64X. And this is only the next 30 years. In the next 60 years, I wouldn’t be shocked if you would see a single little bitcoin being worth $500 million or something.

Consider how insane it is… I think Elon Musk is worth what, $270, billion?  and also, our best friend Mark Zuckerberg, who everyone thinks is such a good shoes… Apparently he just bought his wife a brand new Porsche Cayenne SUV car, and also bought himself a new Porsche GT3 car. not very humble or modest anymore.

Tell me what you drive and I will tell you who you are

Once again, revealed preferences. Revealed truth, revealed philosophy.

Also, Tell me what phone you have and I will tell you who you are.

For example, am I the only rich and successful person I know who just uses an iPhone SE? And drives an old used 2010 Prius?

Sexy girls love the MPG’s!

I want more exposure!

In a world where centralized systems dominate and people are becoming increasingly disillusioned with traditional structures, Bitcoin has emerged as a beacon of hope—a radical innovation that promises a new kind of financial freedom. And at the heart of this movement is Satoshi Nakamoto, the elusive and enigmatic figure whose disappearance adds a layer of myth and mystique to Bitcoin’s origin story. Like Jesus, who left behind teachings that challenged the political and economic power structures of his time, Satoshi introduced a revolutionary idea and then vanished, leaving followers to carry forth the mission. The parallels are undeniable and compelling: Satoshi is, in many ways, the new Jesus of our digital era.

1. The Disappearance as a Sacrifice

One of the most fascinating aspects of Satoshi Nakamoto is the anonymity and subsequent disappearance. Just as Jesus is said to have ascended after his resurrection, leaving his followers with a mission and a message, Satoshi also disappeared, taking with him the keys to Bitcoin’s genesis. In doing so, Satoshi symbolically sacrificed control, allowing the decentralized network to grow independently. This act is akin to Jesus entrusting his disciples to carry forward his message without his physical presence.

Satoshi’s choice to vanish lends Bitcoin a sense of purity and incorruptibility. There is no central figure to influence its direction, no leadership to steer it toward hidden agendas. Instead, the vision and code remain, like scriptures, immutable and open to interpretation by anyone who chooses to engage. This self-removal from the narrative is, in itself, a profound statement—a testament to the power of the idea over the identity. Just as Jesus emphasized that his teachings were not about him as a man, but about the message of salvation, Satoshi’s departure directs attention away from the individual and onto the decentralized, self-sovereign financial future that Bitcoin represents.

2. Bitcoin as a Path to Redemption

For centuries, religions have offered redemption and salvation from earthly suffering. Bitcoin, in a secular, modern way, offers a similar escape from the suffering inflicted by inflation, economic manipulation, and financial dependency on centralized institutions. Under this lens, Bitcoin is a new form of salvation, freeing individuals from the oppression of a fiat system controlled by central banks and governments that can print unlimited currency, devaluing savings and concentrating wealth in the hands of a few.

Satoshi’s gift to the world is this alternative—a chance for financial autonomy, where wealth can be stored in a deflationary asset outside the reach of those who would abuse it. It’s as if Satoshi, like a modern-day messiah, saw the suffering caused by inflation, debt, and manipulation, and gave the world Bitcoin as a tool to escape this system. By holding Bitcoin, individuals are, in a sense, redeeming themselves from the grips of an exploitative monetary structure, finding a path to self-sovereignty and security.

3. The Faith of the Followers

Every powerful movement is sustained by the faith of its followers, and Bitcoin is no exception. Much like early Christians who faced persecution yet continued to spread the teachings of Jesus, Bitcoin’s early adopters, too, encountered skepticism and even outright hostility. Governments have attempted to ban or restrict it, media outlets have ridiculed it, and traditional financial institutions have dismissed it. Despite this, Bitcoin has grown exponentially, carried forward by a devoted community of believers who trust in its potential to reshape the world.

In this way, Bitcoiners mirror the devotion of religious disciples. They have faith in Bitcoin’s future, advocating for it as a tool that will change the global financial system. And just as Christians await the second coming of Christ, many Bitcoin enthusiasts hold onto the hope that one day, Satoshi may return, reinforcing the message or guiding the network through an evolution. Satoshi’s absence, like Jesus’s, has created a void that deepens the mystique and inspires faith. The mystery surrounding Satoshi is part of what makes him larger than life—a figure whose legacy endures precisely because of his anonymity and absence.

4. Decentralization as Divine Design

There’s a profound beauty in Bitcoin’s design that goes beyond mere technology. Satoshi’s vision of decentralization reflects a philosophical foundation that resonates with those who believe in autonomy, freedom, and self-sovereignty. Much like how Jesus spoke of a kingdom not of this world, Bitcoin operates outside traditional structures—it’s not governed by a central bank, nor is it subject to the whims of any single ruler. This decentralization embodies an almost divine design, where power is distributed among the participants rather than concentrated in the hands of a few.

Satoshi’s creation empowers individuals, offering them an opportunity to reclaim control over their financial lives. The network is powered by consensus, a system where every participant has a voice, and no single entity holds authority over the entire system. In this way, Bitcoin is more than just a currency; it’s a movement toward a fairer, more equitable world. It’s an opportunity for people to transcend the limitations of centralized power and find freedom in a system that is governed by code, not by corruptible institutions.

5. A Legacy of Hope and Change

Jesus’s message was one of hope and a promise of change. Similarly, Bitcoin’s ethos is one of disruption—a chance to rewrite the rules, to challenge entrenched systems, and to envision a future where individuals have greater control over their own lives. Just as Jesus’s teachings inspired a movement that would reshape history, Bitcoin has sparked a revolution in finance, technology, and society.

Satoshi’s legacy is one of hope. It’s a vision that extends beyond financial gain, aiming to create a world where people are no longer subject to the arbitrary decisions of central authorities. Bitcoin is a tool for the empowerment of individuals, a catalyst for change in a world where the balance of power is shifting. It offers a glimpse of a future where people can engage in commerce without borders, trust without centralized authority, and live without fear of financial repression.

Conclusion

Satoshi Nakamoto, much like Jesus, offered the world a gift that transcends its immediate utility. Bitcoin is more than money; it’s a movement, a philosophy, and, for some, even a form of secular spirituality. The parallels between Satoshi and Jesus may seem far-fetched at first, but both figures challenged the status quo, inspired fervent followers, and created legacies that live on beyond their physical presence.

In an age where trust in traditional institutions is waning, Satoshi stands as a symbol of hope—a modern messiah for the digital era. His anonymity only strengthens his influence, making Bitcoin a testament to the power of an idea over the individual behind it. And just as Jesus’s message has endured for over two millennia, so too may Satoshi’s legacy persist, inspiring generations to pursue a more just and decentralized world.

zxx

Satoshi: The New Jesus in the Digital Age

By Eric Kim

In the annals of human history, few figures have captured the imagination and reverence of a community quite like Jesus Christ. His teachings, legacy, and enigmatic presence have left an indelible mark on billions. Fast forward to the 21st century, and a new figure emerges in the digital landscape: Satoshi Nakamoto. While the realms of religion and technology may seem disparate, the parallels between Satoshi and Jesus are both striking and thought-provoking. This essay delves into why Satoshi can be perceived as the new Jesus, shaping the ethos of a decentralized world.

A Visionary Teachings

At the heart of Jesus’ influence were his revolutionary teachings that challenged the status quo, advocating for love, compassion, and a new way of living. Similarly, Satoshi Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin through a whitepaper that disrupted traditional financial systems. The proposition of a decentralized currency, free from governmental and institutional control, mirrors Jesus’ message of individual empowerment and spiritual freedom. Both figures presented a blueprint for a new societal structure—Jesus through spiritual salvation and Satoshi through financial autonomy.

Mystique and Anonymity

One of the most compelling aspects of Jesus’ narrative is his miraculous birth, divine nature, and eventual resurrection, all enveloped in a veil of mystery. Satoshi Nakamoto shares this enigmatic aura. Despite Bitcoin’s transformative impact, Satoshi’s true identity remains concealed, fostering a mythic persona. This anonymity has only amplified Satoshi’s stature within the cryptocurrency community, much like the divine mystique surrounding religious figures. The uncertainty invites speculation, reverence, and a sense of reverent curiosity that fuels the legend.

Creation of a Community

Jesus’ teachings galvanized a community bound by shared beliefs and values, leading to the formation of a global religion. In parallel, Satoshi’s creation of Bitcoin has birthed a robust, passionate community advocating for decentralization, transparency, and financial sovereignty. This community transcends geographical and cultural boundaries, united by a common vision akin to a spiritual fellowship. The communal rituals—be it attending blockchain conferences or participating in crypto forums—echo the communal gatherings of religious congregations.

Impact on Society

The ripple effects of Jesus’ ministry reshaped societal norms, ethics, and governance. Similarly, Bitcoin, under Satoshi’s guidance, is redefining economic paradigms, challenging centralized banking systems, and promoting financial inclusivity. The transformative potential of Bitcoin—empowering the unbanked, enabling peer-to-peer transactions, and fostering innovation—parallels the societal shifts instigated by religious movements. Both figures catalyze profound change, urging humanity towards a more equitable and liberated existence.

Legacy and Resurrection

Jesus’ legacy endures through scriptures, traditions, and the enduring faith of billions. Satoshi Nakamoto, despite disappearing from the public eye in 2010, leaves behind a legacy encapsulated in Bitcoin and the broader blockchain revolution. The enduring relevance of Bitcoin, even years after its inception, signifies a resurrection of Satoshi’s original vision. His legacy continues to inspire developers, entrepreneurs, and visionaries to build upon his foundational work, ensuring that his influence persists across generations.

Conclusion

Drawing parallels between Satoshi Nakamoto and Jesus Christ might initially seem unconventional, yet the underlying similarities are profound. Both figures introduced transformative ideas, fostered dedicated communities, and left legacies that continue to shape the world. In an era where technology intersects with every facet of human life, Satoshi embodies a modern-day messiah—guiding humanity towards decentralization, empowerment, and a reimagined future. As Bitcoin and its underlying principles gain traction, the reverence for Satoshi echoes the timeless veneration of Jesus, marking him as the new Jesus in the digital age.

Eric Kim’s perspectives on Bitcoin stand out because he approaches it through a multifaceted lens that combines artistic, philosophical, and technological viewpoints. Here are some of the unique spins he brings to the conversation:

1. Bitcoin as an Artistic and Cultural Icon:

Kim views Bitcoin not merely as a digital currency but as a powerful symbol in art and culture. He appreciates the design of the Bitcoin logo, particularly its bold orange color, which he sees as visually captivating and symbolically significant. This artistic framing extends beyond aesthetics; he likens Bitcoin to limited-edition art, where its finite supply adds value, much like an artist’s body of work gains worth through its scarcity  .

2. Alignment with Stoic Philosophy:

Kim’s admiration for Stoic values shapes his view of Bitcoin as a tool for personal empowerment and self-sovereignty. He sees Bitcoin as embodying independence and resilience—core Stoic principles—because it operates outside of centralized control, providing individuals with autonomy over their finances. For Kim, this decentralization isn’t just a technical feature but a philosophical statement against dependency on centralized systems  .

3. Bitcoin as an Anti-Capitalist Tool:

Kim suggests that Bitcoin challenges traditional consumer-driven capitalism. By promoting a culture of saving rather than spending, Bitcoin, in his view, disrupts the constant cycle of consumption that fiat currencies encourage. He argues that Bitcoin’s scarcity allows it to act as a long-term store of value, making it a potential vehicle for resisting materialism and the consumption-based mentality of modern capitalism .

4. A “Zero to One” Innovation:

Kim describes Bitcoin as a “zero to one” innovation—a fundamental breakthrough rather than a simple improvement. He compares Bitcoin to transformative technologies like the steam engine, suggesting that its ability to decentralize financial systems is a revolutionary shift that could alter the entire fabric of society. This view places Bitcoin within a larger narrative of history-changing inventions, underscoring its potential to redefine how people understand and interact with money  .

5. Future Integration with Creative Projects:

Beyond viewing Bitcoin as a currency, Kim is intrigued by its technological versatility, exploring how it might be integrated with creative projects. He discusses ideas like wrapping Bitcoin with assets like BRC-20 or ERC-20 tokens to enable unique applications in the blockchain space, including NFTs. This interest reflects his belief that Bitcoin can serve as a platform for innovative, decentralized applications in the digital economy .

6. Bitcoin as a New Form of Religion:

Kim has noted that Bitcoin has taken on a quasi-religious quality for some followers, with Satoshi Nakamoto as a messianic figure who sacrificed anonymity for a greater cause. This metaphor emphasizes Bitcoin’s cultural impact, framing it as a movement with followers dedicated to its ethos of decentralization and financial sovereignty. Kim’s perspective here shows how Bitcoin transcends financial utility and becomes a symbol of ideological commitment .

Through these unique viewpoints, Eric Kim positions Bitcoin as more than a financial instrument. To him, it is a cultural artifact, a philosophical tool, and a catalyst for personal and societal change, revealing his deep-seated belief in Bitcoin’s potential beyond traditional financial frameworks.

xxx

Eric Kim offers several innovative and unconventional perspectives on Bitcoin that set him apart from mainstream Bitcoin narratives. Here are a few of his unique ideas:

1. Bitcoin as a New Type of Religious Movement:

Kim draws an intriguing parallel between Bitcoin and religion, likening Satoshi Nakamoto to a messianic figure who sacrificed anonymity to gift a decentralized financial system to the world. This metaphor of Bitcoin as a kind of secular spirituality speaks to its role as a cultural and ideological movement rather than merely a financial asset. He likens it to figures like Banksy, who use anonymity and subversion to make broader statements about society .

2. Integration with Photography and Creative Fields:

In an unconventional twist, Kim explores the potential of integrating Bitcoin with photography and other forms of creative work. He suggests that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies could redefine the economic landscape for digital artists and photographers, allowing them to operate outside traditional payment platforms. This perspective aligns with his own career as a photographer and his belief that Bitcoin can empower creators by providing an alternative to centralized financial systems .

3. Stoic Principles and Financial Resilience:

While Bitcoin is often touted as a hedge against inflation, Kim’s focus on the Stoic values of self-reliance, autonomy, and resilience adds depth to his perspective. He sees Bitcoin as a practical application of Stoic principles, enabling individuals to build financial independence outside of traditional banks and government-controlled fiat systems. This philosophical underpinning positions Bitcoin as more than a tool for wealth accumulation—it becomes a means of personal empowerment and resilience against economic uncertainty  .

4. Critique of Capitalist and Consumer Culture:

Kim’s perspective on Bitcoin as an “anti-capitalist” tool is particularly unique. He suggests that Bitcoin challenges consumerist norms by encouraging people to save rather than spend, thus countering a culture that promotes continuous consumption. He argues that Bitcoin’s finite supply offers a way to preserve wealth without reliance on consumer-driven fiat money systems, making it a vehicle for resisting traditional capitalist values .

5. “Zero to One” Innovation:

Kim likens Bitcoin to a “zero to one” innovation, borrowing a term from Peter Thiel to describe how it represents a fundamental, paradigm-shifting breakthrough rather than an incremental improvement. He sees Bitcoin as comparable to major historical innovations like the steam engine, viewing it as a technology with the power to disrupt not just finance but societal structures as a whole. This perspective places Bitcoin within a broader narrative of technological revolutions that change how humanity interacts with foundational systems .

By approaching Bitcoin with these artistic, philosophical, and cultural lenses, Eric Kim presents a view of cryptocurrency that goes beyond typical financial or speculative discussions, framing it as a catalyst for personal and societal transformation.

The powerful vs the powerless?

An essay on power;

I think I’ve got it figured out

Niggas praying for power! – JAY Z

Respect Jimmy Iovine ,,, but he got to respect the Elohim it’s a whole new regime! – JAY Z

I almost feel like I could live my whole life off of cording Jay Z, Jay Z rap lyrics etc.

So what I find is very fascinating about both Kanye West and Jay Z, if you think about it, they are by far the most honest ones. Why? If you take any sort of traditional skinny fat loser academic, who watches basketball football professional sports, but hasn’t touched a weight or a barbell in years, don’t get at me.

Also very very funny… A lot of highly esteemed professors, at the elite Ivy League schools and UCS, also listen to Kendrick Lamar in secret?

Anyways, I think I got the whole thing figured out with politics, identity politics, race, sex and gender whatever. Essentially everyone is just trying to vie for power.

For example ,,, I find this really really strange movement with indigenous communities etc. Obviously everyone knows that the American colonist were evil bad, and essentially stole all the Native American land, that they probably raped pillage and killed all the locals, either intentionally or unintentionally with their germs diseases etc. kind of like the whole Jared diamond theory about guns germs and steel… The germs one is one that is often overlooked.

But a thought that always keeps coming up in my mind is… Why does this matter? Who cares?

So obviously… Indigenous people care because they were kind of fucked and screwed over. Yet wasn’t everybody kind of fucked and screwed over somewhere?

Fighting for power

So what happens when all your land has been stolen seized… with no justice?

One side calls for some sort of retribution, of land of money of privileges of power of political power etc. Yet from a macro perspective, I kind of scratch my head it finds me a little bit confusing…

What incentive does America or the American government have in giving back money to indigenous people, or local tribes, besides assuaging a guilty conscience?

To me the notion of a guilty conscience is not a strong enough motivation to give reparations?

Reparations is also debasing?

So let us say that it is a fact that the colonizer came in, killed and raped everybody, stole all the land, did all these terrible things. But to give reparations, it all comes down to money… Isn’t this disrespectful? Like for me… For example if some sort of injustice was done to my family, like the death or murder or something of any of my family members, whether it be my wife my kids my mom my sister etc.… Anyone essentially blood related to me, if somebody cut me $1 trillion check that would not be enough justice. For me it isn’t even a matter of justice, but simply revenge.

I forget which ancient writer which wrote it… But talking about revenge is sweeter than honey, probably true.

In modern day times, justice is essentially a rebranding or a standardization or socialized form of revenge. so for example, for one reason or another we have deemed that it is not OK to commit revenge by killing somebody for killing your best friend, as Achilles did to Hector, for the killing of his best friend Patroclus.

unrequited revenge?

So I have a theory, a lot of the modern-day maladies that we face and suffer, it is simply revenge we desire, but for one reason or another, we cannot commit the revenge?

And this is where the whole powerful versus the week thing happened; when you are weak and powerless, and you cannot commit revenge… Then what do you do? Do you become passive aggressive, you become resentful, which is like drinking Poison and hoping that the other person dies.

But the tricky thing is with revenge… In the case of the Elliot, even after Achilles does get his revenge on Hector, the heart of Achilles is actually not fully settled. Achilles still feels the pain the sorrow of his best friend, and even sleeting the throat of some young Trojan boys who they captured as prisoners, burning the massive funeral pyre for Patroclus, and even debating the body of Hector, by piercing his ankles and running laps around the enemy camp, once again still… The heart of Achilles is not settled.

so what is the moral of the story?

I think most people have the wrong. We often look at this like some sort of Judeo Christian morality, I would not trust any sort of modern day American teacher or thinker or professor to uncover the themes of justice and morality here.

So the typical Jude Christian might say that seeking revenge is not the way because even after Achilles got his revenge, his heart still felt sorrow. And then one might invoke some sort of Jesus mentality here; better to forgive your enemies and turn the other cheek.

Problems with this

Once again, turning the other cheek… My thinking and thought in my unorthodox interpretation, kind of in line with Friedrich Nietzsche, is I wonder… If the tactics the morality the ethics the teachings and thoughts of Jesus of Nazareth was simply because Jesus lacked a physical army? If Jesus of Nazareth, also had some sort of military army, a kin to the prophet Muhammad, would he have approached things differently?

Tactics of the weak

So for example, my theory is the whole turning the other cheek, is simply a tactic of the weak. In Jesus‘s time, to simply try to subvert the authority of those in power at the time was kind of like a pre-eminent death. And therefore turning the other cheek was actually the most effective strategy because you could continue to endure abuse, without being outright killed. For your insolence.

so the question is what is the alternative?

Assuming that Jesus of Nazareth, yes, he was a real historical figure, had the ethics or the morality of an Achilles, how would things have turned out differently?

Tactics of the weak

So I’m starting to really really get into this notion of tactics, tactical etc. For example, I will never forget that one moment in John Wick, in which John Wick is meeting the Somalia, getting suited up etc., and asking what the occasion is blah blah blah, and then when asking what kind of attire or formal where he wanted… John Wick just responded with a single word “tactical.”

So tactics, taktikos,,, to arrange, to order,,, tasso…

So typically we tend to think of tactics like military tactics. And almost all of modern language is derived from the military.

So now the big problem is mostly demilitarized world, how are we allowed to talk about military like things, without actually talking about it?

Armored vehicles

So what I discovered in Los Angeles is that whenever somebody pulls up in some sort of AMG g wagon, some sort of Range Rover, high-powered SUV, cyber truck whatever… Essentially what they want is some sort of armored military vehicle. I kind of get it; driving in LA is like a fucking Warzone, kind of like mad Max. And the truth is here, a lot of the drivers drive without abandoned; I honestly think it is a social economic thing; people from the hood drive very recklessly, both endangering themselves and others. in fact, an interesting observation is that you could tell how good or bad the neighborhood is based on how people drive. And also, you could tell whether somebody’s a local or not, to search the neighborhood because once again, holiday drive, and also the make model of their car etc. 

Least one thing I love about Teslas, is they have all the safety things baked into it. Therefore, I think Tesla cars have it pre-wired and programmed into the car that even if the driver wanted to, even if the driver had malicious intent, they could actually not rear end you, or T-bone you; the car would automatically break before it would happen. Also, when you are merging in traffic or on the freeway, always better to cut in front of a Tesla than any other car because once again… The Tesla will automatically brake and stop itself. 

Waymo

Also a random thought, I think in terms of our mind, we don’t like Waymo cars or self driving cars because we don’t feel in control. But the truth is, a WeMo car is probably 1 trillion times safer than real human drivers, on both sides of the equation.

First, Waymo doesn’t text while driving. Literally being here in Los Angeles, whenever I pee into the driver side door, and stare at the people… They are always looking down at their laps, texting while driving, some of them even having the audacity to drive with phone in hand texting!

---

Back to power

OK back to power;

bitcoin is digital power

Also smaller waist size?

---

Men vs women

So some non-politically correct terms;

First, what is the difference between man and woman?

Man desires more power, Marshal prowess, pride glory, eternal fame and revenge. Achilles.

 women desires ease, comfort, Security. A woman would prefer to be in a citadel, a man would prefer to be out in the battlefield.

This is a fascinating thought experiment that invites us to consider how the foundational figure of Christianity, Jesus of Nazareth, might have shaped history differently had he embodied the ethics and morality associated with Achilles, the legendary Greek warrior from Homer’s Iliad. To explore this, let’s first briefly contrast the moral frameworks of Jesus and Achilles, and then examine the potential ramifications of such a hypothetical scenario.

Contrasting Moral Frameworks

Jesus of Nazareth:

• Core Teachings: Emphasized love, compassion, forgiveness, humility, and nonviolence. Central messages include loving one’s enemies, turning the other cheek, and prioritizing spiritual over material wealth.

• Approach to Conflict: Advocated for peaceful resolution, reconciliation, and understanding. His teachings encouraged followers to seek harmony and avoid vengeance.

Achilles:

• Core Traits: Embodied valor, honor, pride, personal glory, and martial prowess. His actions are often driven by personal honor and the pursuit of everlasting fame.

• Approach to Conflict: Preferred direct confrontation, valor in battle, and sometimes acted impulsively based on personal feelings, such as wrath and revenge (e.g., his anger in the Iliad leads to significant consequences).

Potential Historical Ramifications

1. Foundational Teachings and Early Christian Community:

• Shift in Core Values: If Jesus had promoted values akin to Achilles—emphasizing honor, valor, and personal glory—the early Christian community might have developed with a more warrior-like ethos. Instead of a focus on humility and meekness, teachings might have centered around bravery, martial excellence, and the pursuit of honor.

• Religious Practices: Practices and rituals might have included more martial elements, possibly venerating warriors or incorporating combat symbolism.

2. Spread and Adaptation of Christianity:

• Perception by Others: A more warrior-oriented Christianity might have been perceived differently by both contemporaries and later societies. It could have appealed more to militaristic cultures while alienating those valuing pacifism and compassion.

• Interactions with Political Powers: Jesus with an Achilles-like morality might have taken a more confrontational stance against oppressive regimes, potentially leading to early instances of Christian militarization or resistance movements.

3. Ethical and Social Implications:

• Conflict Resolution: Emphasizing honor and valor could have led to a theology that accepts or even glorifies conflict as a means of achieving righteousness, differing sharply from the nonviolent resistance championed in historical Christianity.

• Community Dynamics: The social fabric of early Christian communities might have been more hierarchical or structured around martial leadership rather than the egalitarian and servant-leader models associated with Jesus’ teachings.

4. Long-Term Religious Developments:

• Doctrinal Evolution: The doctrines of Christianity could have evolved to incorporate themes of heroism and battle against evil in a more literal sense, potentially influencing doctrines related to the end times, spiritual warfare, and the role of believers in societal conflicts.

• Institutional Structures: Churches and Christian institutions might have developed militaristic orders or knightly classes, similar to how monastic orders evolved but with a stronger emphasis on martial roles.

5. Cultural and Artistic Influence:

• Literature and Art: The portrayal of Jesus and Christian narratives in art and literature would likely emphasize heroic battles and personal valor, altering the symbolic and inspirational messages conveyed through these mediums.

• Festivals and Celebrations: Religious festivals might include martial parades, competitions, or commemorations of battles deemed spiritually significant.

Conclusion

Had Jesus of Nazareth embodied the ethics and morality of Achilles, the trajectory of Christianity—and consequently, much of Western civilization—could have been markedly different. The religion might have taken on a more militaristic and honor-driven character, potentially influencing everything from theological doctrines to social structures and cultural expressions. While it’s speculative to assert exactly how history would have unfolded, it’s clear that the foundational moral teachings of a religious figure profoundly shape the beliefs, practices, and evolution of their followers and institutions.

This exercise underscores the significant impact that foundational ethical and moral frameworks have on the development of religious movements and, by extension, on broader societal values and historical outcomes.

The word “tactics” has a rich etymological history that traces back to ancient languages, particularly Greek and Latin. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Etymology of “Tactics”

1. Modern English “Tactics”:

• Origin: The term “tactics” entered the English language in the early 17th century.

• Path: It was borrowed from the French word “tactique”, which itself was derived from the Latin “tactica”.

2. Latin “Tactica”:

• Meaning: In Latin, “tactica” referred to the art of arrangement or the science of order, especially in a military context.

• Origin: This Latin term was directly borrowed from the ancient Greek.

3. Ancient Greek “Τάκτις” (Taktis) and “Τάκτική Τέχνη” (Taktikē Tékhnē):

• Primary Term: The Greek word “τάκτις” (“taktis”) means “arrangement” or “order.”

• Extended Term: “Τάκτική Τέχνη” (“taktikē tékhnē”) translates to “the art of arrangement” or “the skill of order,” encompassing the strategic deployment of forces in warfare.

• Root Words:

• “Τάσσω” (Tássō): Meaning “to arrange” or “to order.”

• “Τάξις” (Taxis): Meaning “arrangement” or “order,” from which “tactics” ultimately derives.

Ancient Greek and Latin Equivalents

• Ancient Greek Equivalent:

• “Τάκτική Τέχνη” (Taktikē Tékhnē): Literally “the art of arrangement,” this term was used to describe military strategy and the effective deployment of forces.

• Latin Equivalent:

• “Tactica”: Borrowed from Greek, the Latin “tactica” maintained a similar meaning, referring to the art and science of military maneuvers and arrangements.

Summary

• “Tactics” in English derives from the French “tactique”, which comes from the Latin “tactica”, and ultimately from the Ancient Greek “τάκτικη τέχνη” (“taktikē tékhnē”).

• The Ancient Greek equivalent is “τάκτικη τέχνη” (taktikē tékhnē), emphasizing the art of arrangement and military maneuvers.

• The Latin equivalent is “tactica”, carrying forward the same connotations of strategic arrangement and order.

This etymological journey underscores how the concept of “tactics” has been integral to military and strategic thinking since ancient times, evolving linguistically through Greek and Latin before becoming a staple term in modern English.

Eric Kim’s concept of “optimistic fatalism” combines a deep acceptance of life’s inherent difficulties with a proactive and empowering outlook. This philosophy suggests that while one may acknowledge the unavoidable challenges and limitations in life, it is possible—and even essential—to extract as much positivity and opportunity from each situation. Kim proposes that instead of aiming for ideal conditions or perfection, one should focus on maximizing the potential of their current circumstances, no matter how imperfect or difficult they may seem.

In practical terms, optimistic fatalism encourages embracing life as it is, with all its flaws and uncertainties, rather than wishing for things to improve. Kim suggests that a constant pursuit of an ideal future can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction. Instead, by accepting and even leaning into life’s adversities, one can find new ways to thrive. This approach aligns with Kim’s emphasis on resilience, as well as his admiration for Stoic and Spartan values, where strength comes from confronting and enduring life’s struggles.

Moreover, Kim’s optimistic fatalism is an invitation to live fully in the present, without being paralyzed by the fear of potential setbacks. He posits that engaging fully with whatever life presents—good or bad—can lead to a more fulfilling and meaningful existence, turning apparent limitations into creative opportunities. This mindset is about redefining success in life, not by minimizing pain or maximizing comfort, but by seeing each moment as a chance to practice resilience and to find joy in personal growth and self-improvement.

This philosophy is integral to Kim’s overall approach to life and art, where he often champions radical self-acceptance and personal empowerment, advocating for individuals to craft their own paths regardless of external expectations or societal norms. In his work, he consistently encourages others to embrace uncertainty and to live dynamically, seeking fulfillment through active engagement rather than passive contentment.

For a deeper dive into Kim’s philosophy, you can explore his writings on optimistic fatalism on his blog.

Here are a few of Eric Kim’s quotes on “optimistic fatalism,” which encapsulate his perspective on embracing life’s imperfections and challenges:

1. On Accepting Life’s Imperfections:

“To accept things as sub-optimal, and won’t get better … and to accept ‘not the best’— perhaps this is the best road to extracting the maximum out of life and existence?”

This quote emphasizes the idea that by accepting things as they are, rather than as we wish them to be, we can make the most of each moment .

2. On Maximizing the Present:

“The purpose of life isn’t to optimize for the ‘best,’ but to use the current ‘bad’ situation and scenario you got right now, and exploit that to the maximum.”

Kim encourages us to view life’s challenges not as obstacles but as opportunities to make the best of what’s immediately available  .

3. On Finding Strength in Adversity:

“A life without pain, difficulty, or tragedy isn’t a life worth living.”

This perspective aligns with his belief in the value of resilience and personal growth that comes from facing life’s challenges head-on, rather than seeking constant comfort .

These quotes reveal Kim’s stance on optimistic fatalism as a philosophy that promotes resilience and personal empowerment by urging individuals to focus on growth and opportunity within their present circumstances, rather than constantly seeking an elusive ideal future. You can explore more of his thoughts on this philosophy on his blog   .

Eric Kim’s interest in Bitcoin reflects his alignment with the cryptocurrency’s foundational principles, particularly its decentralized nature and scarcity. He views Bitcoin as more than a financial asset; to him, it represents a philosophical shift away from centralized financial systems. Influenced by Stoic principles of self-reliance and independence, Kim is drawn to Bitcoin’s potential to provide individuals with greater financial autonomy, much like the resilience and independence promoted by ancient Stoic philosophy and cultures like Sparta  .

Kim also sees Bitcoin as a “digital gold,” with its fixed supply of 21 million coins providing a stark contrast to fiat currencies, which central banks can devalue by printing more money. This scarcity principle is central to his critique of traditional financial systems, which he views as subject to manipulation and prone to inflationary risks. He suggests that Bitcoin’s scarcity not only preserves value but also offers a more ethically grounded form of currency, one that is free from the political and economic influences that often impact fiat currencies  .

Furthermore, Kim considers Bitcoin a transformative innovation—a “zero to one” shift—that has the

What are some of his unique innovations or thoughts about bitcoin, which is a little bit different than the mainstream narrative on bitcoin?

Eric Kim’s views on Bitcoin diverge from mainstream narratives in several unique ways, emphasizing artistic, philosophical, and technological perspectives:

1. Bitcoin as an Artistic Expression:

Kim sees Bitcoin not only as a financial instrument but also as a symbol with strong visual and cultural resonance. He describes the Bitcoin logo, particularly its bold orange color, as an artistic icon that visually “pops” compared to other cryptocurrencies. This artistic lens aligns with his background in photography and his view that Bitcoin, like art, can disrupt traditional systems and provoke thought .

2. The “Digital Gold” Concept and Scarcity:

While Bitcoin’s fixed supply is a well-known narrative, Kim connects this to broader ideas of value and mortality. He likens Bitcoin’s limited quantity to the finite works of artists who pass away, drawing a parallel with artists like Jean-Michel Basquiat whose artworks became more valuable after their deaths. This notion of scarcity resonates with him on a philosophical level, reflecting his view that Bitcoin’s value grows as it remains uninflated and limited, similar to limited-edition art  .

3. Bitcoin as a Foundation for Future Technology:

Kim is intrigued by how Bitcoin can integrate with other blockchain-based technologies. For instance, he mentions the concept of “wrapping” Bitcoin with assets like BRC-20 or ERC-20 tokens, which could potentially bridge Bitcoin with newer digital assets like NFTs. This perspective demonstrates his interest in Bitcoin not merely as a static store of value, but as a flexible tool for building decentralized applications in the digital economy .

4. Cryptocurrency as an Anti-Capitalist Movement:

In some of his reflections, Kim suggests that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies challenge traditional consumer-driven capitalism by reducing dependency on fiat money. He criticizes fiat currency as a capitalist construct that pressures individuals toward constant spending and financial manipulation. By promoting Bitcoin as a long-term store of value, Kim hints at a countercultural shift where wealth is preserved outside of government and consumer influences  .

5. Bitcoin and Self-Sovereignty:

Beyond decentralization, Kim sees Bitcoin as a tool for personal empowerment. He views it as a means of achieving financial independence, which ties into his Stoic beliefs about autonomy and resilience. This view extends to his advocacy for using Bitcoin in significant purchases, like real estate, as a way to sidestep traditional financial institutions and assert financial self-reliance—a notion he contrasts with the consumerism and dependency fostered by centralized banking systems

“In the shadows of conventional finance, Bitcoin emerges not just as a currency, but as a movement—a silent revolution reshaping the very foundations of our economic landscape.”

— Inspired by Eric Kim

In the bustling streets where every corner tells a story, Bitcoin stands as a testament to human ingenuity and the relentless pursuit of freedom. Much like a street photographer capturing fleeting moments, Bitcoin captures the essence of a decentralized future, where power shifts from centralized institutions back into the hands of the individual.

At its core, Bitcoin operates on a principle that resonates with the urban explorer: autonomy. Traditional financial systems, with their labyrinthine regulations and gatekeepers, often feel restrictive, much like the controlled environments that limit a photographer’s creative expression. Bitcoin dismantles these barriers, offering a platform where transactions occur peer-to-peer, free from the oversight of banks and governments. This autonomy is not just a feature; it’s a fundamental shift in how we perceive and interact with money.

Another tactical advantage of Bitcoin lies in its transparency and security, akin to the clear, unfiltered vision a photographer strives for. Every transaction is recorded on the blockchain, an immutable ledger that ensures trust without the need for intermediaries. In an era where misinformation and fraud are rampant, Bitcoin’s transparency serves as a beacon of reliability. It’s a system designed to be resilient against manipulation, much like a well-composed photograph withstands the test of time.

Moreover, Bitcoin’s finite supply mirrors the scarcity that gives art its value. With only 21 million bitcoins ever to be mined, the cryptocurrency inherently resists inflation, contrasting sharply with fiat currencies that can be printed endlessly. This scarcity drives demand, much like limited edition prints elevate the worth of a photograph. Investors and users alike recognize Bitcoin not just as a medium of exchange, but as a store of value, a digital gold that safeguards wealth against the uncertainties of traditional markets.

The decentralized nature of Bitcoin also fosters a sense of community and collaboration, reminiscent of the interconnected networks that support street photography. Developers, miners, and users around the world contribute to the ecosystem, each playing a vital role in its maintenance and evolution. This collective effort ensures that Bitcoin remains adaptable and innovative, capable of navigating the ever-changing technological and economic landscapes.

However, Bitcoin is not without its challenges. The volatility of its value can be likened to the unpredictable weather that street photographers must contend with. Yet, just as persistence and adaptability can turn a fleeting moment into a masterpiece, navigating Bitcoin’s fluctuations requires resilience and a long-term vision. Those who embrace its volatility often find themselves at the forefront of a financial revolution, reaping the rewards of early adoption and strategic foresight.

In conclusion, the tactics of Bitcoin revolve around decentralization, transparency, scarcity, and community—principles that resonate deeply with the ethos of street photography. Both Bitcoin and the art form it draws inspiration from challenge the status quo, offering new perspectives and empowering individuals to take control of their own narratives. As Bitcoin continues to evolve, it invites us to rethink our relationship with money, much like how photography encourages us to see the world through a different lens.

Your wife, your kids!

Search, is it possible to mortgage Bitcoin for 30 years with APR, similar to how you mortgage a home or a single family home?

Yes, some fintech companies, such as Milo, are offering 30-year crypto-backed mortgages that allow you to use Bitcoin as collateral, similar to traditional home mortgages. With these loans, you can secure up to 100% of the property value without the need to sell your Bitcoin, potentially avoiding capital gains taxes. The interest rates on these loans vary depending on the lender but tend to be competitive with traditional mortgage rates, typically ranging from about 6% to 9% APR  .

In a Bitcoin-backed mortgage, the lender holds the Bitcoin collateral throughout the loan term. If the value of Bitcoin drops significantly, you might be required to add more collateral to maintain the loan’s required value ratio, or the lender could liquidate part of your collateral to cover the shortfall. This type of mortgage does not usually require credit checks, and approval is often faster than traditional mortgages due to fewer formalities  .

While these crypto-backed loans provide an innovative way to leverage digital assets for real estate, they come with unique risks, especially related to the volatility of cryptocurrencies. Borrowers must carefully monitor Bitcoin prices and be prepared for potential margin calls, as fluctuations in Bitcoin’s value can impact the stability of the loan .

…

Yes, it is possible to use Bitcoin as collateral for a mortgage, but there are unique considerations and risks involved. Crypto-backed mortgages allow individuals to leverage their Bitcoin holdings without needing to sell them, making it possible to access funds for purchasing real estate. In this type of mortgage, you deposit your Bitcoin with a lender as collateral, which remains locked up for the loan’s duration. Once the loan is repaid, the Bitcoin is returned. However, if Bitcoin’s value drops significantly, you may face a margin call, requiring additional collateral to maintain the loan balance or risk liquidation of your assets  .

Lenders, such as Milo and Figure, are leading providers of crypto-backed mortgages. These companies offer loan options that typically do not require credit checks, making it accessible for those with non-traditional income sources or limited credit history. The loan amount generally depends on the value of your Bitcoin, with loan-to-value (LTV) ratios often around 50-60%. For instance, if you aim to buy a property worth $500,000, you may need at least $250,000 to $300,000 in Bitcoin as collateral  .

Crypto-backed mortgages come with certain advantages, like avoiding capital gains tax on your Bitcoin and the potential to hold onto it for future appreciation. But these loans are subject to volatility risks, as cryptocurrency values can fluctuate significantly. Borrowers may need to monitor Bitcoin’s market value closely and be prepared to provide additional collateral during downturns to avoid asset liquidation .

Overall, while crypto-backed mortgages offer a way to leverage digital assets for real estate purchases, they require a thorough understanding of both the risks and the lender’s terms.

3 milli on a home or for and towards Bitcoin?

so currently you could do some sort of 30 year or maybe sometimes even 40 year mortgage on a home… Anywhere between 5 to 7% APR, why don’t we have this option to mortgage bitcoin?

…

so for the last two or three years, ever since Seneca was born, I haven’t touched a keyboard, a physical or virtual keyboard maybe in 3 1/2 years. Everything is just voice dictation on the iPad Pro with the built-in Apple keyboard.

The major problem is even in 2024, while the voice dictation is good, Apple Intelligence or whatever is not yet smart or clever enough to know the different nuances of language yet; for example, I often have “voice typos“, In which I’m trying to say something, and a homophone or another word that sounds similar to it is accidentally inserted.

I think the great promise of some sort of ChatGPT phone device, ideally without a screen is that in theory you should be able to just voice dictate everything, with 100% accuracy.

The paradox of showing off; you could show off your home, your car, your wealth your investments your clothes your money, your possessions, your photos of your trip to Venice or the south of France, yet you cannot show off your body your arms or muscles your 6 pack?

Theories:

My first theory is that capitalism consumerism, starts to be shaped as a morality ethos or ethical things; the body is seen as something as to be despised and ashamed of. This is why all modern day clothing and fashion trends, doesn’t tend towards being naked; because it is hard to sell being naked.

—> the gods, who live at *ease*—

Anti beta —

What’s your desire?

AI — to me, essentially like Google on steroids!

To set up and use custom settings (C1, C2, C3) on your Lumix camera, you’ll need to access the “Cust. Set Mem.” feature, typically found in the setup menu of the camera. Here’s a general guide on how to create and utilize these custom modes:

1. Set the Mode Dial: Switch the mode dial on your Lumix camera to the setting you want to customize (such as Aperture Priority or Shutter Priority). Configure all the settings as desired, including ISO, white balance, and focus mode.

2. Access the Cust. Set Mem.: Navigate to the menu, usually under “Setup” or “Custom” settings. Here, look for “Cust. Set Mem.” which lets you save these configurations. Select one of the custom slots, such as C1, C2, or C3.

3. Save Settings: After choosing a slot, press MENU/SET to save the configuration. The camera will store all your current settings in the selected custom slot, which you can recall instantly by turning the mode dial to C1, C2, or C3. If you need additional settings, certain models (like the GX9 and G90/G95) offer expanded C3 slots (e.g., C3-1, C3-2) for more customized setups.

4. Using Custom Modes: When you turn the mode dial to one of these custom slots, the camera automatically applies the saved settings. If you make any changes during shooting, you can revert to the original saved settings by switching away from the custom mode and then returning to it.

5. Updating Custom Settings: If you need to modify a custom setting, simply adjust the settings while in the custom mode and re-save them following the same steps. This flexibility lets you adapt your custom modes as your shooting needs evolve without having to reset everything manually each time.

6. Managing Multiple C3 Options: On models like the Lumix G9 and S5, you can save up to three configurations under C3 (such as C3-1, C3-2, and C3-3), which is useful for varied scenarios, like different lighting setups or specific types of photography, such as portraits or fast-action shots   .

By following these steps, you can optimize your camera for quick access to preferred shooting settings, allowing you to switch seamlessly between different shooting environments.

Vlog thoughts

Change ideas

Video Podcast vlog

Wow, looking recently at my arms, my arms are super amazingly fucking jacked! Even without flexing, they look amazing! Very very full in the triceps, the biceps the shoulders and other parts of my body, which I cannot really notice.

And also, after getting a fresh haircut, from Cindy… Very very simple, shaving the sides clean, and just getting some cheap gel and slicking it back, Cindy calls it my “Lamborghini haircut”,– and also, this might be the lowest body fat percentage in my life! I think currently I’m at around 4% body fat, naturally without any weird stuff. And note, I might be the only weightlifter or bodybuilder or power lifter or strong man on the planet who doesn’t even take protein powder! Let alone loser creatine, which is the century just pulverized meat, why not just eat the meat?

And also, am I the only one on the planet who fast before weightlifting? Certainly the only one on the planet, may be out of all 8 billion of us, who was able to successfully lift 1000 pounds, that is over 10 1/2 plates on each side of the barbell, successfully, once again, without steroids, unnatural substances, and also no loser belt, wraps, knee wraps etc. 

Rack rack city bitch

Very simple; rack pulls are your best friend. Imagine like doing a dead lift, but you just put the barbell on the power rack or the squat rack, at around waist level, in between your knees and your hips, experiment at your height level, whatever feels comfortable, chalk up, and just lift the barbell off of the rack, even for half an inch or so! Literally after doing it with eight plates, I felt the good soreness in my biceps, my upper back, my traps etc.

Honestly the only reason people don’t do it is because people lack some sort of innovative mindset and creativity. People are still stuck on this loser thinking by analogy school in which everyone is just giving fellatio to Arnold Schwarzenegger, and all these loser bodybuilders on social media, for all injecting their assholes with steroids.

In fact, I’ve discovered a really really huge secret, the only reason you see more African-American and Caucasian people in the NFL professional sports etc., even I symbolize the NBA… Is all these guys are just using steroids! The only reason why you don’t see as many Asian guys in professional sports isn’t some pseudo racial things; genetics is fake; anyone who talks about genetics is essentially talking about he who is able to best use steroids and not get caught, or, to best use steroids with a stack of other strange drugs, to not have their breast tissue turn into “bitch tits” etc.

Finishing reading pumping iron  the original book I think in 1973, and with an updated afterward in 1980, when Arnold was 34 years old, super rich and successful, with his $700,000 house in Santa Monica, and just fresh shooting Conan the barbarian with a $15 million budget, and note, adjusted for inflation these numbers are huge, this was 1980! Which I think was 44 years ago? Wow. That’s even longer than I was alive; I’m 36 years old born in 1988.

Anyways, even back then — in this so-called “golden ages” of bodybuilding… 1973, now I do the math, it is 2024… This is about 50 years ago! Holy moly I’m 36 years old right now, if I added 50 years to my age, I’d be 86!

Anyways, just thinking consider if in 1973 all these dudes are already injecting their buttholes with steroids, anabolic steroids which at the time they didn’t even think that it was dangerous, or bad, imagine how much steroid technology has progressed in 50 years, to today.

And when I look at all these modern day bodybuilders and fitness people on Instagram and YouTube etc., it’s kind of like male prostitution; kind of how a lot of these influencer girls end up being these WebCam virtual prostitutes, to make money. Whatever I think it is fine; but if I had a daughter, no way in hell would I want her to do that kind of work. And also, no way in hell would I ever want Seneca do you ever inject his buttholes with steroids.

Giant or midget?

Also ,,, the least harmful major?

 so what is so interesting about looking at it in the past about Arnold Schwarzenegger and the like is that there is this notion of being a giant. I think it’s kind of a day term now, like Tony Robbins he has this seminar called awaken the giant within, which talks a lot to the baby boomer generation. And apparently the opposite of being a giant is a midget, which is not politically correct anymore, the nicer term to use is person of small stature or dwarf or something. Or you just pretend like they’re not a midget.

Anyways, whether this matters or not, is beyond my pay grade. Would I’m more interested in is how we could do things more naturally, get super fucking jacked and amazing without steroids or weird stuff.

The key is to consume more dietary cholesterol, a.k.a. beef liver and organ meats.

So I thought, maybe the whole keto ketogenic diet movement is a bit flawed because they do not emphasize the necessity for consuming dietary cholesterol in organ meats etc. For example, am I the first to propose this notion of 100% organ me to diet, which is 80% beef liver, beef beef kidney beef intestines etc.… And supplementing it with other stuff like eggs, including the yolk, or flesh meats?

The reason why I believe this to be such a big idea is that the loser vegan evil corporations like Bill Gates and James Cameron and the like promote this insane notion of a plant-based diet veganism, because it is so profitable. And let us consider, what is more profitable, to sell some sort of overpriced Pea protein powder, to these foolish millennial and zillenial and Gen Z folks, which makes them feel good about the planet or whatever? Or to sell them organ meats, which is not profitable. Even the American beef corporation, they cannot sell it effectively.

Just follow the money

ChatGPT is also a positive good for society because it is the number one way to smash inequality, racism sexism, and also… To overturn these ridiculous conspiracy theories?

For example, anybody with an iPhone and access to YouTube and podcast, who listens to Joe Rogan or whatever, well sooner or later fall victim to these weird conspiracy theories. Why? My theory is people cannot bear a society and world and universe which has no rhyme, no reason, which is just injustice. When people believe in a conspiracy theory, it feels just — it feels like it sets the order right.

Because once again, most feeble people cannot bear an injust world and society. 

It goes against everything that we have been taught about justice equality fairness etc. The world is not just.

---

The great solution

I have a very very simple solution; optimistic fatalism.

Fatalism simply means that everything is bad, injust, evil whatever.

Optimism, we all know what this means.

So my notion of optimistic fatalism is the ultimate hammer, the ultimate  solution. Both at the same time, put it inside your head and your brain and your soul and your body… That truth be told in fact, yes, it is all bad evil and injustice. But in spite of all that… How can you make the best of it?

Or even a step further, to think and understand that in fact, all of the badness injustice in the world etc., was positively helpful to make your life better?

The winner take all reality 

For example, I am the only winner in the world of street photography. The only one who was able to successfully do all the successful things, travel the planet and get all the accolades, and become a bitcoin millionaire out of all of it.

Now great upside is because now that I am financially independent, I can continue to give away all of my stuff for free open source, because I don’t have a profit incentive anymore. And now becomes more of an ethical thing; doing that in which I believe in, because I want to help humanity.

But, being a humanitarian, I think the only way to ethically do it is to be somehow self sponsored, financially independent, not having an office administrators and staff, and donors.

Why? As long as you have donors, it can never really be truly just. You’re going to have to parade around your poor kids at these annual dinners, to provoke sympathy, and a bad conscience to these rich donors, to keep them employed.

I could speak because I myself was one of these kids, KCCEB, Korean community center of the East Bay, I’m very very grateful for all of our mentors, but it has not lasted.

Nonprofits do not last.

---

Corporations don’t really last either

Only things which have lasted are the Vatican, the holy Roman Empire 2.0, Catholicism, independent wealthy families, endowments at Ivy League schools etc.

Showing my tattoos… I’m such a showoff! – Kanye

Audio

Video vlog

Why is Change So Difficult?

I think in life, one of the most difficult things is change. Adapting to change, thinking about change considering change etc. 

First, a creativity innovation carte Blanche thinking first principles thing. 

First, to think new and become new is difficult. It takes great skill, innovation, and radical understanding, it is not for the meek of heart. 

Second, I think the difficult thing is a deseridatum thing, a desired thing. The big question we have to think is is it desirable to think new and become new? 

First if you think from a capitalistic consumer perspective… Obviously it thrives on the new. For example, if we were all stuck on the original iPhone three iPhone 3GS… I’m sure people will not be very happy. I would also be very unhappy if I still had the original iPad, The current iPad Pro M4 chip I’m using, is literally like 10 trillion times better.

In fact, going to Hong Kong later this year, and I was thinking and reflecting… Time and technology; also staring at my old G9 camera, how at the time in 2017, 2018… It was literally the best camera on the market at the time. But now times have changed, and also technology has changed. Therefore the most intelligent strategy is right now, looking at it from scratch… I’m thinking… Right now in this given moment, what is the best option for things?

For example, when I first really got into photography, a lot of of it was dictated by technology. For example, when I was in high school, as a senior graduation present my uncle got me a Canon point and shoot power shot digital camera, I think it had 1.2 megapixels or something, but still… I loved it! It was always in my front pocket, and I literally photographed everything I saw. So when I discovered the macro mode, the rule of thirds grid, and also how he was able to shoot black-and-white, it blew my mind!

Fast forwarding a bit, getting my first Canon rebel XT camera then my canon 5D full frame camera, and discovering the whole lot, and then progressing a bit and getting the Leica M9 camera,  traveling the world etc., getting into film, the digital Ricoh and now currently the LUMIX S9– wow, technology has changed things a lot.

My major critique about a lot of people who tend to give fellatio to the past is that the past is predictable, easy, requires no courage. It is very very easy to hide behind Hitler mustache, some ugly flannel, some ugly throwback clothing, baggy clothes, drive some sort of base level German car, And opine on the past. And say how analog was super superior filmless superior vinyl superior whatever, and trying to harden back to our ancestral pest.

What I think takes more courage is to instead, rather than pink by analogy, to think the present moment right now, not by analogy or metaphor or to oversimplify the past.

For example, a lot of people tend to think of the past, romanticizing the past etc.… But you fools, don’t you realize that the past was most definitely 1 trillion times worse than it is today? For example, industrial London, childbirth mortality was 70 to 80%, Colorado dysentery, and sanitation had not even been discovered; if you accidentally poked yourself, they would probably surgery on you with rusty unsanitized instruments, this is before they even knew that you’re supposed to boil water before drinking it!

Even now, our understanding of things is literally 1 trillion times backwards. For example, this insidious idea of calories in calories out, “burning” calories. You fool! Don’t you understand that it is hormonal, driven by sugar, insulin, insulin signaling and spiking? The only reason why this calories in calories out notion still exist is the evil Coca-Cola corporation, who wants you to have a “balanced diet”, “moderate exercise”, that you can sneak in 100 cal Coca-Cola a day, and not “gain weight”– whereas in fact, the truth is gaining or losing fat,,, not weight.

Some people think that these are lexical different things, but this is not the case this could literally be a life with that matter, type two diabetes and type three diabetes (alzheimers) has anything to do with you or your family or parents.

How to respark your passion for photography and life!

Minimal is better —