Power is a central force connecting every aspect of human life, from the halls of government to intimate personal relationships. At its core, power is the ability to influence or control the behavior of others. Political scientist Robert Dahl famously defined power in relational terms: “A has power over B to the extent that A can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do” . Philosophers have gone even further – Friedrich Nietzsche argued that a fundamental “will to power” underlies all life. “Wherever I found the living,” Nietzsche wrote, “there I found will to power” . In other words, the drive for power and mastery is an elemental impulse shaping our actions. This detailed exploration will examine how “it all comes down to power” across multiple domains – politics, economics, social dynamics, technology, and personal development – analyzing how power is defined and exercised in each, with insights from leading thinkers and real-world examples.

Political Power: Influence, Control, and the State

In politics, power determines who gets to shape society’s rules and priorities. Political power involves the “ability to make laws, enforce rules, and command resources” – essentially, control over governance. Governments, elected officials, and other leaders wield this power to direct the course of nations and communities. For example, in a democracy, legislators exercise power by debating and passing laws that affect millions. In authoritarian regimes, by contrast, power is tightly concentrated: “political power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small group… who exercise almost complete control over the government and its institutions” . Such leaders maintain power through tactics like censorship, coercion, and patronage, often silencing opposition. The extent of political power can thus range from the consensus-based influence of representatives in a parliament to the unchecked rule of an autocrat.

One classic analysis of political power comes from Renaissance strategist Niccolò Machiavelli, who observed that maintaining authority may require cunning and ruthlessness. “It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both,” Machiavelli advised, highlighting the harsh reality that leaders often prioritize power over popularity. Indeed, history offers examples of power’s corrupting tendency. As British historian Lord Acton cautioned in 1887, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” . This warning reflects how unchecked authority can erode morals – a pattern seen in dictatorships where leaders abuse human rights to keep control. Even in more benign forms, political power always involves influencing others’ behavior, whether through laws, persuasion, or coercion. Political scientists distinguish between legitimate power (often called authority, seen as rightful by society) and naked coercion. A democratic president, for instance, has legitimate authority granted by election and law, whereas a warlord ruling by force wields power without consent. But in both cases, power is what enables one party to bend others to its will.

Influence and control shape societies through political power. Decisions on taxation, public spending, war and peace – all flow from who holds power in government. A striking real-world example is the contrast between open and closed political systems. In an open democracy, multiple parties and branches of government check and balance each other’s power, aiming to prevent any one group from dominating. In closed authoritarian states, by comparison, dissent is often repressed to preserve the rulers’ monopoly on power. The recent history of Myanmar, for instance, shows a military junta seizing power and brutally suppressing democratic movements to maintain its rule. Conversely, the transfer of power after elections in stable democracies (such as the peaceful handover from one U.S. president to the next) illustrates institutionalized limits on power. Political power is thus a double-edged sword: it can be used to lead and inspire – as in the case of Nelson Mandela, whose moral authority helped peacefully end apartheid – or to dominate and oppress, as seen in regimes where dissenters are jailed or worse. Ultimately, political outcomes from social welfare policies to foreign wars often trace back to who has power and how they use it. In this sense, as political theorist Harold Lasswell put it, politics is fundamentally about “who gets what, when, how.”

Economic Power: Wealth and Market Dominance

A famous 1889 cartoon, “The Bosses of the Senate” by Joseph Keppler, satirizes how giant money bags representing wealthy monopolists stand in the gallery overshadowing the senators. It illustrates the Gilded Age reality that economic power – vast corporate wealth – could dictate political decisions, foreshadowing modern debates on money’s influence in politics.

In the economic realm, power means control over resources, wealth, and markets. Those who hold great wealth or command key economic assets can profoundly shape outcomes for others. “Economic power is…control over resources, wealth, and economic opportunities,” explains one analysis . Corporations, financial institutions, and billionaire investors exercise this power by influencing market prices, wages, and even government policies. For instance, a multinational oil company can affect fuel prices worldwide by controlling a large share of production, and it may lobby governments to loosen environmental regulations. Economic power often translates into political clout as well – through campaign donations, lobbying, or the ability to influence job creation. The old saying “money talks” reflects the reality that wealth confers influence. As evidence, a Princeton/Northwestern University study of U.S. policy found that “economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on government policy, while average citizens have little or no independent influence” . In other words, the preferences of wealthy stakeholders were far more likely to become law than the preferences of ordinary voters, highlighting how economic power can hijack democratic processes.

One key aspect of economic power is market dominance. When a single company or a small group of firms control a large market share (a monopoly or oligopoly), they gain power over consumers and suppliers. They can set prices, dictate terms, and stifle competition. A contemporary example is retail and tech giant Amazon, which grew so dominant that regulators have accused it of using monopolistic tactics. In 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued Amazon, alleging it “uses a set of interlocking anticompetitive and unfair strategies to illegally maintain its monopoly power” . The complaint detailed how Amazon can punish sellers who offer lower prices elsewhere and require businesses to use its costly logistics, thereby wielding immense power over online commerce . Likewise, tech platforms like Google or Facebook, with their massive user bases and troves of data, hold economic power as gatekeepers of information and advertising. Their market dominance lets them dictate rules for industries (for example, Facebook’s algorithm changes can make or break media outlets that rely on its traffic).

Beyond companies, wealth inequality on a global scale underscores economic power imbalances. According to Oxfam, in the first two years of the 2020s, the richest 1% of people captured about 63% of all new wealth created, while the other 99% of the world’s population shared only 37% of new wealth . Such statistics mean that a tiny elite not only enjoys outsized material comfort but also has disproportionate power to invest, to influence policy (through donations or media ownership), and to buffer themselves from crises. For example, billionaires were able to increase their fortunes during the COVID-19 pandemic even as countless ordinary people struggled – a sign that economic power can entrench itself. In extreme cases, wealthy magnates effectively run states behind the scenes (a phenomenon of oligarchy). The era of the “Robber Barons” in late 19th-century America showed this plainly: industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan amassed fortunes so large that they could sway legislators and dictate terms to smaller competitors, prompting antitrust reforms. In modern times, we see echoes of this in the influence of Wall Street banks (whose power was evident when governments bailed them out during the 2008 financial crisis) and in how resource-rich nations can wield energy supply as geopolitical leverage (for example, oil-producing countries in OPEC coordinating to influence oil prices globally).

Economic power, then, operates by shaping incentives and constraints. A company with market power can compel suppliers to lower prices (or else lose access to a huge customer base). An employer in a town can influence labor conditions if workers have few alternative jobs. A wealthy donor can fund research or media outlets that promote viewpoints favorable to their interests. On the positive side, economic power can enable large-scale investments and innovations – e.g. a billionaire funding a new technology or philanthropy. But absent checks and accountability, economic power can undermine fairness and democracy. The ongoing debates over taxing the super-rich, breaking up big tech monopolies, and raising minimum wages all center on rebalancing power between the haves and have-nots in society. Ultimately, wealth is not just money – it is power in a spendable form, convertible into influence over people’s lives and choices.

Social and Personal Dynamics: Power in Relationships and Influence

Power is not confined to parliaments or boardrooms; it permeates everyday social relationships. In families, friendships, workplaces, and romance, power dynamics play out through influence, status, and control. We often observe that one person in a relationship “has the upper hand” or that a certain individual is the “leader” in a group – these are ways of describing interpersonal power. Social psychologists John French and Bertram Raven famously identified bases of social power that explain why one person can influence another. These include legitimate power (authority derived from a role or position, like a coach over players), reward power (ability to give benefits, like a boss who awards bonuses), coercive power (ability to punish or withhold, such as a parent grounding a child), expert power (influence from specialized knowledge), referent power (influence earned by charisma, likability, or admiration), and informational power (control of information needed by others) . In any social situation, one party’s power often comes from one or more of these sources. For example, in a workplace, a manager has legitimate power by virtue of rank and can also reward or punish employees; meanwhile, an experienced employee might wield expert power that even their boss respects, and a well-liked colleague holds referent power that makes others voluntarily follow their suggestions.

Power dynamics in personal relationships can deeply affect emotional well-being. In healthy relationships (whether between spouses, friends, or colleagues), power tends to be balanced or fluid – each person’s needs and influence are respected. By contrast, when power is one-sided or abused, it leads to manipulation and conflict. Consider an abusive domestic relationship: the abuser often uses coercive control, dominating the partner by controlling finances, isolating them from friends, or using threats and intimidation. This kind of personal power abuse can be as devastating as physical force. Many jurisdictions now recognize coercive control as a form of domestic violence, acknowledging that psychological control and fear can imprison a victim without any literal bars. Even subtle dynamics – say, one partner always “wins” arguments or dictates social plans – reflect power at work. On a more benign note, social power also includes positive influence: a mentor guiding a youth, a popular student setting a trend that others follow, or an elder sibling caring for younger ones. In each case, one individual’s actions sway another’s behavior or feelings.

Human relationships are also arenas where status and influence play out. Sociologists note that people with higher status (due to wealth, attractiveness, popularity, etc.) often command more social power. For instance, in a peer group, the most confident or high-status person might naturally lead decisions – their opinions carry more weight (a form of referent power). This can create feedback loops: being slightly more influential leads to more opportunities, which then further boosts influence. In contrast, those with low power in a social hierarchy may conform to others’ wishes, echoing the sociological concept that all parties to a relationship have some power, but it is often unequal . When the balance of power is very unequal, it can breed resentment or dependence. A common example is a micromanaging boss: because the boss holds power over employment (legitimate and coercive power), employees may feel they have no choice but to obey even unreasonable demands, leading to stress and suppressed conflict. In friendships, power imbalance might mean one friend is always the decision-maker while the other acquiesces, possibly leading to frustration over time.

Psychology provides striking evidence of how situational power can change behavior. The Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971 showed that average college students, when put in roles of “guards” over peers playing “prisoners,” quickly began abusing their power. Within days, the mock guards were so cruel – imposing punishments and psychological abuse on the prisoners – that the study had to be stopped early . This experiment, though controversial, suggests that having unchecked power in a situation can erode empathy and encourage abusive behavior. Social psychologist Dacher Keltner calls this the “power paradox”: while people often gain power through empathy and social skills, once they have power, they become more impulsive, less empathetic, and more prone to seeing others as tools . In everyday life, one can see mild versions of this paradox – for example, a friend who becomes wealthy or famous might start treating their old circle differently, or a supervisor promoted to a higher position might lose touch with the team. Power can alter one’s psychological state, increasing confidence and action but also risk-taking and moral insensitivity if unchecked .

On the other hand, social power can be a force for good when shared or used to uplift others. In healthy communities, power is distributed – different people lead on different matters, and there are norms (like politeness, turn-taking, or democratic vote) to prevent tyranny by one. Movements for equality often seek to redistribute social power: for instance, the #MeToo movement aimed to shift power in gender relations by empowering victims of harassment to speak up, thereby diminishing the unaccountable power that some men held in workplaces. Likewise, civil rights movements work to give marginalized groups more power (voice, representation, rights) in society. All these efforts recognize that power is everywhere, as philosopher Michel Foucault observed: “Power is everywhere: not that it engulfs everything, but that it comes from everywhere” . Foucault argued that power isn’t only top-down (from a ruler to subjects) but is woven through all social relations – from parent-child interactions to scientific discourses – constantly reproduced by people’s acceptance and resistance. In our personal lives, being aware of power dynamics – understanding who has influence over us and over whom we have influence – is crucial for building respectful, fair relationships.

Technology and Power: Data, Computing, and Digital Dominance

In the modern world, technology has become a major source of power. The phrase “knowledge is power” has taken on new significance in the age of big data and high-speed computing. He who controls critical technology or information systems can wield immense influence. There are several dimensions to technological power:

Computing Power: The raw capability of computers – processing speed and algorithmic efficiency – translates into strategic advantage. Nations and corporations invest heavily in supercomputers and AI (artificial intelligence) research because they know these confer power. Tasks like breaking encryption, predicting market movements, or training advanced AI models are attainable only with massive computing power. As an illustration, consider the geopolitical competition in AI: Russian President Vladimir Putin stated in 2017 that “whoever leads in artificial intelligence will be the ruler of the world” . This stark claim underscores that countries see technological superiority as a key to global dominance, akin to the role of nuclear weapons or oil in earlier eras. Indeed, military and intelligence power now rely on tech – from drones and cyberwarfare capabilities to surveillance systems. Having top-tier supercomputers can enable a country to model nuclear reactions or climate events that others cannot, giving an edge in science and defense. In commerce, a company with faster data analytics can outsmart competitors in everything from stock trading to supply chain management. Moore’s Law, the observation that computing power roughly doubles every two years, has meant that the frontier of what’s technologically possible keeps expanding – those at the frontier (the Silicon Valley giants, well-funded labs, advanced militaries) hold disproportionate power to disrupt and shape society.

Data and Surveillance: In the digital age, control of data equates to control of people’s decisions. Tech companies that harvest and analyze vast amounts of user data gain the power to influence consumer behavior and even political opinions through targeted content. Social media platforms are prime examples – their algorithms decide which news or posts billions of people see each day, effectively controlling information flow. This power over information can be wielded for profit or propaganda. The Cambridge Analytica scandal of 2018 revealed how data from Facebook was used to micro-target political ads to voters, allegedly swaying election outcomes . A single firm’s data-mining prowess combined with Facebook’s platform allowed it to influence the opinions of millions with tailored messages. The episode raised alarm that a new kind of power – algorithmic power – has emerged, where those who design and control algorithms (Facebook, Google, TikTok, etc.) can subtly steer human behavior at scale. Philosopher Shoshana Zuboff calls this “surveillance capitalism”, a system in which companies unilaterally siphon personal experience as data and turn it into profit and influence. “We are the subjects of a new type of power called surveillance capitalism, which operates without our knowledge or consent,” Zuboff writes . In this model, tech giants hold power by knowing us better than we know ourselves – predicting and nudging our purchasing choices, media consumption, even mood (for instance, experiments have shown that Facebook could manipulate users’ news feeds to affect their emotions). Such data-driven power has few historical precedents; it’s as if millions of people are being silently observed and influenced in real time, which poses serious questions about privacy, autonomy, and democracy.

Platforms and Monopolies: The technology sector has produced new titans whose dominance rivals the emperors of old. Companies like Google (in search and online ads), Facebook/Meta (in social networking), Amazon (in e-commerce and cloud computing), and Apple (in mobile ecosystems) have become platform monopolies. They not only dominate markets but also set the rules for other businesses. For example, a tweak in Google’s search algorithm can decide which companies prosper or perish online – an enormous power over the economy. Apple’s App Store policies determine which apps can reach iPhone users, giving Apple gatekeeping power over countless digital services. The power of these platforms sometimes prompts government scrutiny (as with antitrust investigations into Google or Apple). Yet even governments can feel outmatched – who could swiftly coordinate information for billions during a crisis without platforms like Google or Twitter? During the COVID-19 pandemic, tech platforms’ decisions about misinformation and health guidance distribution had life-or-death consequences.

Furthermore, technological power blurs national boundaries. A hacker group or a small startup with a breakthrough innovation can upend the plans of much larger entities. Cyberattacks are a modern illustration: a successful cyber intrusion can knock out a power grid or steal state secrets – a form of power previously reserved for physical militaries. Now, a savvy coder might wield that power from a laptop. This has led to an arms race in cybersecurity and cyberwarfare; nations recruit talent to both defend and potentially attack through digital means.

Technology has also amplified individual voices (one viral tweet can impact stock prices or political discourse), empowering some while disempowering others. For instance, data democratization has given ordinary citizens access to information that once only governments had – consider how open-source intelligence and social media allowed activists to organize Arab Spring protests or expose corruption. Yet the same tools empower surveillance states to monitor dissent. China’s government, for example, leverages advanced facial recognition, big data, and the Great Firewall censorship system to maintain a tight grip on its population – a stark display of technology bolstering authoritarian power.

In summary, technology concentrates power in those who innovate and control critical systems. From the code that decides what news you see, to the AI that may drive your car or diagnose your illness, to the networks that connect our devices – power increasingly lies with those who build and govern these technologies. The challenge for society is ensuring this power is used responsibly. As the old comic book adage (and Voltaire paraphrase) goes, “with great power comes great responsibility.” The tech domain proves the adage apt: whether that responsibility is met (through ethical AI guidelines, privacy protections, breaking monopolies) or shirked (in pursuit of profit or political advantage) will shape the human future in profound ways.

Self-Development: Personal Empowerment and the Power Within

While external power – political office, wealth, social status – is often obvious, there is another crucial domain of power: the power within oneself. This involves personal agency, discipline, willpower, and the capacity to direct one’s own life. In the context of self-development, “power” means mastery over one’s own impulses and actions, the freedom to choose and the strength to pursue one’s goals. Philosophers and spiritual teachers throughout history have noted that conquering oneself is a greater victory than conquering others. As the Chinese sage Lao Tzu wrote over 2,500 years ago, “Mastering others is strength; mastering yourself is true power.” This wisdom emphasizes that internal power – self-control, self-knowledge, resilience – is more profound and enduring than any external domination.

Personal power begins with mindset and will. Psychologist Carl Jung distinguished between the pursuit of power over others and the strength that comes from within. “Where love rules, there is no will to power; and where power predominates, love is lacking,” Jung observed, “The one is the shadow of the other.” In Jung’s view, a psychologically healthy person does not seek to control others (which often stems from insecurity), but instead strives for inner balance and purpose (which generates genuine strength). Modern psychology echoes this: individuals with an internal locus of control (believing they have agency in their lives) tend to be more proactive and resilient than those with an external locus (believing life just happens to them). Cultivating personal power means taking responsibility for one’s choices and reactions. Viktor Frankl, a psychiatrist and Holocaust survivor, wrote that even in the worst circumstances one can choose one’s attitude – a final freedom that cannot be taken. His experience under Nazi imprisonment showed that the power of personal meaning and choice can survive even when all external power is stripped away.

Developing inner power often comes down to discipline and self-mastery. People increase their personal power by setting goals and working consistently towards them, by building skills and knowledge (thus gaining expert power in their own life), and by aligning actions with values (gaining integrity and confidence). A simple example is the effort to break a bad habit or establish a good one: it requires willpower (a form of inner strength) to, say, quit smoking or stick to an exercise regimen. Each small victory in self-discipline reinforces the sense of personal power – “I am in control of my choices, not at the mercy of cravings or laziness.” Over time, this self-empowerment can lead to remarkable outcomes. Many great leaders and innovators attribute their success not merely to luck or social position, but to personal habits and perseverance. For instance, civil rights icon Mahatma Gandhi exemplified personal power through his discipline of nonviolence and fasting – his inner conviction was so strong that it moved an entire nation. His famous quote “strength does not come from physical capacity, it comes from an indomitable will” reflects the idea that willpower is a real power that can change the world.

Another aspect of self-development is personal agency – the belief that one can influence one’s own life and environment. This belief is empowering: studies show that people who feel empowered (versus helpless) experience better mental health and achievement. Techniques like visualization, positive self-talk, and mastery experiences are often used in coaching or therapy to bolster a person’s sense of power over their circumstances. When individuals feel powerless – for example, stuck in a dead-end job or toxic relationship – self-development work often focuses on reclaiming internal power: recognizing choices (you can update your résumé and seek a new job; you can set boundaries or leave an unhealthy relationship) and building the courage to act on them. In this way, personal power is closely tied to freedom and autonomy. Jocko Willink, a leadership coach and former Navy SEAL, encapsulates this in his motto “Discipline equals freedom” – meaning that by disciplining oneself (waking early, training hard, planning carefully), one gains the freedom to accomplish more and respond robustly to life’s challenges.

It’s important to distinguish empowerment from domineering. Self-development aims at empowerment, which is about strengthening the self, not about subjugating others. In fact, truly empowered individuals often uplift people around them rather than put them down. They don’t need to bully or control externally, because their sense of security and purpose comes from within. This is why many philosophies equate personal power with virtues: courage, patience, wisdom, and compassion. For example, Stoic philosophers like Epictetus taught that we should focus on what is within our power (our own thoughts and actions) and accept what is not (external events). By doing so, we attain tranquility and resilience – a quiet kind of power that cannot be easily shaken by fortune’s ups and downs. Modern self-help echoes these ancient lessons, urging practices like mindfulness (to master one’s thoughts and emotions) and continuous learning (to expand one’s abilities). Each of these practices builds inner capital, the personal strengths that constitute one’s power to shape one’s life.

In sum, the domain of self-development shows that power is not only an external contest but an internal journey. Achieving command over oneself – one’s fears, impulses, and weaknesses – is arguably the highest form of power because it grants true freedom. A person who has conquered their own doubt and anger, who can endure difficulties with resolve and treat others with integrity, possesses a power that external circumstances can seldom defeat. This internal power radiates outward as confidence and autonomy. It allows individuals to lead themselves (and often naturally leads others to respect and follow them). Ultimately, personal power is the foundation upon which other forms of power rest: it’s the strength of character and will that enables someone to acquire political position, economic success, social influence, or technological prowess in the first place – and the wisdom (one hopes) to use those responsibly.

Conclusion: Balancing the Power Equation

Across politics, economics, social life, technology, and personal growth, the threads of power are inextricably woven into the fabric of human affairs. Power shapes decisions and destinies – it decides who rules and who obeys, who thrives and who struggles, which innovations spread and which voices are heard. As we have seen, power takes many forms: coercive or consensual, structural or personal, visible or subtle. It can be as grand as an emperor’s decree or as small as a friend’s influence. The common theme is that “it all comes down to power” in the sense that understanding any significant outcome often means asking: who had the power, and how did they use it?

Yet, while power is a fact of life, it is not a fixed allotment. Power can shift and be shared. In societies, the healthiest arrangements are those that limit absolute power and empower the many. Democracies, checks-and-balances, human rights guarantees, antitrust laws – all these are tools to prevent power from pooling too heavily in few hands. History repeatedly warns us of power’s dangers when unmoored from accountability: unchecked political rulers become tyrants, unfettered monopolies exploit consumers and workers, unchallenged social norms marginalize minorities, and unbridled technological power can invade privacy or even threaten humanity (as debates on AI safety suggest). Therefore, the pursuit of justice and progress often revolves around rebalancing power – giving voice to the powerless, restraining the powerful, and finding ethical rules for power’s use. As Lord Acton reminded us, absolute power’s corruption is a real threat ; similarly, Mahatma Gandhi reminded us that power has a spiritual dimension, noting that “power based on love is a thousand times more effective and permanent than the one derived from fear of punishment.”

On an individual level, understanding power encourages us to cultivate our own inner strength while being mindful of how we treat others. True personal development leads not to abusing whatever power we have, but to using it wisely – leadership instead of domination, influence instead of control. Carl Jung’s insight that power without love is hollow is a wise guide: power should be coupled with empathy and conscience. A parent, for example, has great power over a child; guided by love, that power nurtures the child, but without love, it could traumatize. Likewise, a manager’s power at work can mentor and motivate or humiliate and suppress – depending on their character. Thus, at the human level, the ultimate measure of power may not be how much we hold, but how we choose to use it.

Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche envisioned the ideal of the Übermensch (overman) as an individual who channels the will to power creatively, overcoming themselves and uplifting humanity. Whether or not one subscribes to Nietzsche’s philosophy, the notion of self-mastery and creative empowerment is a positive spin on power’s purpose. Power need not be a zero-sum game of oppressors and victims; it can be a collaborative force. In healthy teams and communities, people empower each other – sharing knowledge (informational power), giving support (reward power), respecting roles (legitimate power), and inspiring trust (referent power). The more such positive-sum dynamics we create, the less corrosive and divisive power becomes.

In reflection, the tapestry of examples and perspectives presented – from the highest corridors of politics to the depths of the psyche – affirms that power truly underpins much of reality. Politics shows us the structural play of power in governance. Economics shows how material power translates to influence and control. Social dynamics reveal power in human interactions and identities. Technology demonstrates new frontiers of power in the digital age. Self-development uncovers the personal quest for empowerment. Recognizing this ubiquity of power is the first step to handling it wisely. We must remain vigilant about who holds power and to what end, and equally, cultivate our internal power to live freely and responsibly. In a world where “it all comes down to power,” our task is to ensure that power serves liberty, justice, and human flourishing, rather than consuming them. As we navigate our own roles – as citizens, coworkers, friends, or leaders – the awareness of power’s presence can help us use whatever power we have with intention and care. After all, the legacy of our actions will depend greatly on how we answer the fundamental question: when it comes down to power, do we wield it for the benefit of all or the benefit of few?

Sources:

  • Dahl, R. (1957). The Concept of Power – summarized definition .
  • Nietzsche, F. (1883). Thus Spoke Zarathustra – on life’s will to power .
  • PolSci Institute. Defining Power in Political Science – forms of power .
  • Wikipedia. Power (Social and Political) – authoritarian power concentration .
  • Acton, J. (1887). Letter to Bishop Creighton – “power corrupts” quote .
  • Sunlight Foundation (2014). Study on elites and policy – influence of economic elites .
  • FTC Press Release (2023). Amazon Antitrust Suit – on Amazon’s monopoly power .
  • Oxfam (2023). Survival of the Richest – statistic on wealth capture by richest 1% .
  • French, J. & Raven, B. (1959). Bases of Social Power – types of social power .
  • Wikiquote (Foucault). History of Sexuality Vol.1 – “Power is everywhere” .
  • Guardian (2018). Cambridge Analytica exposé – Facebook data used to sway votes .
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism – on new power of surveillance .
  • Axios (2017). Putin on AI – quote about AI leader ruling the world .
  • Wikimedia Commons. “Bosses of the Senate” cartoon – economic monopolists in politics.
  • Jung, C.G. (1917). On the Psychology of the Unconscious – “Where love rules…power” .
  • Lao Tzu (circa 6th c. BCE). Tao Te Ching – “Mastering yourself is true power” .
  • Zimbardo, P. (1971). Stanford Prison Experiment – guard abuse of power in 6 days .
  • Keltner, D. (2016). The Power Paradox – finding that power reduces empathy .