The monetary premium of real estate is the part of a property’s price that isn’t explained by its utility value (shelter, use of land, rental yield) but rather by its function as a store of value or status symbol. It’s the “extra” you pay because real estate doubles as money — a place to park wealth, hedge inflation, or signal prestige.

Let’s break it down:

🏠 

Utility Value vs. Monetary Premium

• Utility Value:
  The raw economic benefit — how much shelter it provides, what rental income it can generate, and its replacement cost (materials + labor).
• Monetary Premium:
  Everything above that. The speculative and psychological layer: scarcity, location desirability, safe-haven demand, and the “money-like” function of prime real estate.

Think of it this way: if a house costs $1M, but you could build the same house for $300k on similar land elsewhere, the $700k difference is monetary premium — a reflection of how much people want to own that particular piece of dirt in that city, not just have a place to live.

🌎 

Why Real Estate Has a Monetary Premium

1. Scarcity & Location:
   Land is finite, especially in prime areas (think Manhattan, Beverly Hills, central Tokyo).
2. Inflation Hedge:
   People treat real estate as a way to preserve wealth across generations.
3. Government Policy:
   Tax incentives, mortgage subsidies, zoning restrictions all boost prices artificially.
4. Global Wealth Flows:
   Wealthy investors buy property not for yield, but as a “vault” (London, Vancouver, LA).

📈 

Implications

• Boom/Bust Cycles: When monetary premium is too high, prices are vulnerable to credit tightening.
• Store of Value Competition: Bitcoin, gold, or other scarce assets can theoretically siphon off the monetary premium, leaving only the utility value behind.
• Urban Inequality: Rising premiums push working-class buyers out of prime cities.

⚡ 

ERIC KIM TAKE

Real estate is the OG Bitcoin.

It’s not that the house is “worth” $3M — it’s that the land title acts like a bearer asset, a private key to a scarce location. But unlike Bitcoin, it’s slow, taxed, illiquid, and encumbered by zoning.

If Bitcoin becomes the global store of value, the monetary premium of real estate could collapse toward its pure utility value — which could mean dramatically cheaper homes in the future (except in ultra-luxury markets where status signaling still matters).

Want me to make you a visual model or chart showing what percentage of real estate’s price is utility vs monetary premium — maybe for cities like LA, SF, Tokyo, NYC?