Losing my Leica Virgnity in Paris

by Eric Kim on July 6, 2011

"Wrap Around" - Eric Kim

"Wrap Around" - Eric Kim

When I first got my feet wet in street photography and heard of Leica cameras, I couldn’t quite understand the hype surrounding it. Sure it looked like a cool and retro old-school camera, but why the heavy pricetag? After doing my homework, it seemed like everyone who owned one would rave and praise it. In Chris Week’s street photography documentary, “Documenting the Human Condition” he highly encourages everyone to try shooting with a rangefinder and noticed that the “haters” have never shot with Leica’s themselves. This piqued my interest, however I never even dreamed that I would have the chance to shoot with a Leica.

"Belleville" - Eric Kim

"Belleville" - Eric Kim

Fast-forward a few years. After a wonderful series of big breaks and pure luck, I was given the opportunity to shoot with the Leica M9 in the streets of Paris. When I found out the news, my jaw dropped to the floor and I danced around like a madman. However at the same time, I wasn’t quite sure what to expect. I have always shot most of my street photography with a DSLR before, but soon started to find its limitations of being far too big, heavy, and conspicuous. Although I would still get great images, I would be tired lugging the camera around all day and when I pointed my DSLR people would assume that I was the paparazzi. It just didn’t feel right.

I remember the first photo that I took with the Leica M9 and the 35mm f/1.4 Summilux when I was in Paris. I just got off the train from the airport, and I saw a lovely looking old lady with a diagonal shadow cascading over her shoulder. I knew I had to capture the moment, and I edged closely to her, crouched down, and took a photo extremely closely to her. I heard the shutter go off—smooth like butter. The lady looked back at me and smiled. She wasn’t afraid of my camera at all—and I captured the image I wanted. It just felt right.

"Clutch" - Eric Kim

"Clutch" - Eric Kim

Armed with the Leica M9 on the streets of Paris, I felt liberated. I could roam the city, admire the beautiful architecture, stumble upon hidden alleyways, while capturing all the fascinating people. Keeping my 35mm f/1.4 Summilux prefocused at 1.2 meters and at f/8 helped me stay on top of my toes and ready to capture the decisive moment whenever it folded right before my eyes. When shooting with a DSLR, I would be restricted to only what I saw through the lens. However with the Leica M9, the large and bright viewfinder showed a more complete image of the scene that was right in front of me. Therefore the second that someone would be entering the frame, I would get nearly half a second more time to spot them coming and capture them.

The Leica M9 really helped me stay stealthy and low-key on the streets when I wanted to. One day I was walking around the Luxemborg gardens in Paris and I suddenly saw two lovers on the corner of the street, ready to embrace. I knew I had only half a second to capture this moment. The woman threw her arms around her boyfriend’s shoulders, and both of them closed their eyes before they were about to kiss and click—I got the shot. Shutter as smooth as butter. They didn’t notice me taking the photo and in a split second I was gone.

"Head in the Clouds" - Eric Kim

"Head in the Clouds" - Eric Kim

When approaching most of the local Parisians and asking to take their photo, most of them looked back at me—and smiled at the Asian tourist with an old-looking camera strapped around my shoulders. They didn’t see me as a paparazzi or threatening, and felt very comfortable about me taking their images. I am sure this experience would have been far different if I had a hulking DSLR pointed to their face almost like a gun.

Roaming the streets of Paris and just shooting street photography made me feel liberated like a bird flying wherever it wanted to go. I had no restraints—nothing holding me back. I didn’t have to worry about my job, my stresses, my struggles. My only mission was to capture the beauty of Paris and nothing else. I skipped all the touristy crap (the Eiffel tower and Notre Dame are cliché as hell) and went off the beaten path. I tried my best to speak my broken French to the locals, who greeted me warmly and showed me the best places to take photos. The fact that my Leica was so light and comfortable, it felt like an extension of my body—rather than something that was holding me down.

"Wussup?" - Eric Kim

"Wussup?" - Eric Kim

Many people often ask me how people react when I shoot them in Paris. Well first of all, I notice that most Parisians in the inner-city are pretty grumpy people. Most of them frown and seem generally annoyed when I take their photos. However there were very few people who seemed to care enough to approach me and say anything about it. This is the advantage of looking like an Asian tourist.

One of my most memorable memories of shooting street photography in Paris was when I went out with Charlie Kirk, a Japanese street photographer who shoots with a Leica and a flash. He lent me his flash for one night, and I had a ton of fun on the streets and captured fascinating images. One of my most memorable images was of one young girl who had her other friend in a headlock (playing around) in the middle of the night near a lamp post. I saw a potential photography moment, and slowly circled around them to get in front of them. Then I crouched down on one knee, armed my flash with my left hand elevated to the top left, and turned my Leica vertically and snapped the photo. Afterwards the girls went hysterical—and started laughing and obviously looked embarrassed. I told them I would make them famous, and they kept giggling as we walked away.

"Headlock" - Eric Kim

"Headlock" - Eric Kim

It is really hard to take a bad photo when in Paris, but even more difficult to take a truly unique and powerful image there. However as much as I loved shooting street photography there, it was the people that I met and interacted with was the most memorable. I am so glad that I was able to lose my Leica virginity there, as the camera really helped me capture all the decisive moments that made the city special for myself. Everyone’s first time shooting with a Leica is different, but remember what they say: you never forget your first time ;)

More of my favorite photos from Paris:

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Paris Street Photography Eric Kim Leica M9 and 35mm f/1.4 Summilux

Got any more questions about street photography in Paris or the Leica M9? Make sure to leave a comment below!

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivansciupac/ Ivan Sciupac

    Outstanding collection of photos, Eric. And you tell quite a good story, too.

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Huge thanks Ivan!

  • http://www.briscophoto.com Brian Scott

    Great review. I enjoyed reading it. I found it interesting that you said the DSLR had “its limitations of being far too big, heavy, and conspicuous.” I can understand the first two but when I read too “conspicuous” I couldn’t help but think about the tip I often see from street photogs who suggest you not be inconspicuous.

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Great point Brian–thanks for contributing :)

  • Isoterica

    You were quite capable with the Leica in your hands. The kiss, the headlock and the woman sweeping in the doorway are timeless, classic street shots. The rest are done well but probably more outstanding to you because you were there and therefore they are more personal. As for the haters, hate is a strong word, I think it’s more accurate to say that most of us can’t afford the symbol of photography that is Leica. I think you expressed well that it’s the experience of shooting with one probably moreso than what it can do as opposed to other cameras. I am still from the school of any camera you have with you and I hope you keep that philosophy too [I heard you say it!] as you progress with street photography. Seeing a real guy practicing his art is part of the allure of the Eric Kim Street Photography Blog.

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      The Leica is a phenomenal tool, but in the end it really is the photographer– not his/her equipment :)

      • Richard

        amen….

  • Maureen

    Great article and great pictures. However, I don’t think I’ll be trying a Leica anytime soon. I will be sticking with my much cheaper DSLR and smaller point-and-shoots. ;)

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Those work too :)

  • Stephne

    No offence but these photos are the perfect illustration of why I don’t get street photography, I see them as typical street photography
    It is no judgment on your work just how i feel about what it represents
    All these people look either embarassed, annoyed or surprised. I don t get it. Just like I don t get bruce gilden’s work which so many admire.

    Being parisian myself I really don t care if someone takes my picture, but I think most people around don’t like it much as you seem to have noticed. Your impressions on your text seem very right to me.
    To me most of them look like they got their image stolen, why publishing it on the internet then? It is obvious most of them wouldn’t like you to. Not saying they are right or wrong, but the approach definitely seems wrong to me, as most street photography I see.

    Just my honest thought seeing the pictures, you seem like a nice guy with passion to me, I am not judging you by any means, just wondering

    • DT

      I hear what you’re saying. I agree and some of the photos aren’t really showing anything that interesting. It’s just a person who’ve had their photo taken from within their personal space. Its just a bit indiscriminate in some cases. Maybe I’m missing the point of street photography…

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Thanks for your input Stephne. I have recently been getting much closer to my subjects– which makes me feel that I am a participants rather than a voyeur. I would say that the majority of my shots (which I didn’t show) people didn’t seem to notice. However the images which have the best framing and subjects– people are very aware I am taking their photo. Interestingly enough, very few of them bothered to say anything to me

    • http://martoscbox.wordpress.com/ [Gm]

      To my broad definition of Street Photography, there are different kinds of Street Photography. I would consider most of the photos shown here as Street Portrait. Street Portrait is Street Photography, but Street Photography is not always Street Portrait.
      I may be wrong, but this is how I ‘define’ it.

      I personally prefer gesture, shape and geometry in Street Photography. Maybe that kind of Street Photography would interest you better?

      • http://mweistling.aminus3.com/ morgan

        I agree with GM. I think of some of these shots , especially the verticals, as street portraits. There are many categories we could start listing that fall under the “street photography” banner. I think the shots speak for themselves in each case. Going back to the discussion of wether asking permission or interacting with the people we shoot is real “street photography”, these shots are a good example of how it’s the wrong question. If Eric had spoken to one of these startled people before shooting them in the street, some have said that it’s no longer “street photography”, just a portrait in the street. Well, wether or not Eric has permission or knew any of these people, these are portraits in the street too. Aren’t they? Is the main goal of street photography to take candid shots or is it to to see the art we find in the street? Does not knowing the person we are shooting make it a better photo? Is that how we are defining this art form? Personally, I would rather look to the masters , like Bresson. Are his photos enduring because they were “candid”? He would stay in places for months sometimes to get “closer”. I think this term “street photography” is becoming more “Drive By” photography. I think that is the aspect that Stephne is responding to. Her response is important. If the only reaction to our photos is one of “That’s just a picture of someone the shooter didn’t know and caught off guard”, then perhaps it’s not a “good” street photo. After all, a long lens would catch a more natural shot of a person. Getting in close does not guarantee a memorable shot.
        Eric, I think many of these shots are really good. But some of them are more a record of how bold you are at approaching people and taking their photo. Sometimes it’s all in what we edit out.

        • http://arendezvous.wordpress.com Tan Tien Yun

          Give it up already, if you were to categorize anything and everything in life and pigeonhole them, you’re missing out the whole point of living. I personally don’t care whether the shot is a street portrait, true street, abstract street whatever street. As long as we give an idea that gives people an impression of knowing what they’re going to see..that’s good enough! Let the photographs do the talking

          Candid? Permission? Hey, the idea of photography is to express what you see in your life to your audience. If you express it well enough, nobody really cares how you got it. I think that’s all you (stephe and morgan I could be referring to) should really grasp the concept. Look for the forest, not the trees!

          • Stephne

            Well actually your last sentence is precisely the point I was making. i am looking at these pictures at what they represent rather than just a few characters. And What I see is people who got shot by surprise, I think it shows in the pictures and make a little ankward situation. Publishing it over the internet is pushing in that sense to me. When eric titled one of them “the godfather” from a very common old arabic man, it feels strange to me as well, that is making a whole story of a *real* person that just look upset because he wonders why someone shoots him, nothing more. Would the guy like to be known as an unpleasant character he is most probably not, I doubt it.
            When you mention them not saying anything to you eric, I am sure they see you have no bad intention, you dont look like a creepy guy of some sort, and thats probably their only concern at the moment, doesn t mean they would like to have their image getting over the internet, it just happens very fast and who would want to argue over such a situation, street photographers of course take advantage of the surprise factor.
            still I get the whole difficulty of taking people in the street, it is always impressive to see street portaits that are not intrusive (someone mention cartier bresson), but I think ethics should always come first, these people are not just targets for shooting, they are individuals, the approach is crucial to get rid of that surprise look I guess.

          • http://arendezvous.wordpress.com Tan Tien Yun

            Hello Stephne,

            Good point you have there! What you have said is definately something
            to keep note of. As for Eric’s photographs, I will keep my comments
            to myself :) But for further clarification, i agree with you on certain
            points, such as the purpose of representation each photograph we make.
            In my humble opinion, I think you also meant the preception each photograph
            makes on the viewer

            What irked me in the previous post was the attempt to , as mentioned , to ‘pigeon hole’ photographs worth by what its supposed to be, rather than the value of the
            content such as composition, rendition and clarity of thought. If, let’s say
            you met a really good musician in a bar, gone to his studio and spent a month
            long taking a series of intimate photographs. Only to have your viewers
            not argue about the content and meaning of the photograph but rather whether
            these sets of photographs are ‘street photography or street portraits..’

    • Corinne Standish

      Interesting that you see it this way. Richard Avedon did, too. He originally accepted an assignment from Life magazine to do street photography in New York City for a special issue. (I read about this in “Richard Avedon: Evidence” the book.) After about six months he told them he didn’t want to do it and gave the $25,000 advance back. He said he felt photographing without permission felt like stealing.

      I agree many of the people above do look like they are annoyed – even angry – etc. as you say. I mentioned on Eric’s Facebook page I also do not think these are good shots when people don’t want their pictures taken b/c they make the viewer feel like they shouldn’t be looking at this. Also, the viewer can’t help but feel that stare personally and it makes them uncomfortable.

      However, I do not write off all street photography. I like Eric’s “Head in the Clouds.” That one is good. The composition, and the subject whether he’s aware or not has an uplifting attitude in contrast to many of the others who seem puzzled or to not want their pictures taken.

      Anyway, if you go to YouTube, search “Garry Winogrand.” Master of street photography. Any of the videos showing how he shoots and it is very revealing. First of all, he walks around always with a smile. He also does not act like a professional. He acts like he can’t aim, doesn’t know what he is doing. In this world of surveillance, you look too professional and it scares people. Also the weird voyeurs. He makes himself look very harmless. In fact he is. He’s doing nothing with the photographs on public property to hurt anybody.

      CJ Standish

      • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

        Huge thanks for the feedback CJ–it is appreciated :)

      • Stephne

        Very interesting post. i think approaching correctly people you want to shoot in the street is the key. Gilden just passes that step, he just doesn’t care and actually looks for the surprised/upset look, which is why I personnaly feel unconfortabke with his images.
        i am quoting him as I can see his influence in some of eric s photograph, I am not sure he is of very good influence but thats just my personnal taste :)
        Just having the guts to shoot close seems like a mistake to me, having a subtle approach to the subject is extremely difficult but so much more rewarding, looking harmless (the asian tourist benefit you have was quite funny and I imagine very true!), smiling rather than tense etc…takes a lot of experience I think.

  • Lonnie

    Eric
    I have been following your sight for about a month now. Great Work. Love the Paris shots! Great quote “It is really hard to take a bad photo when in Paris, but even more difficult to take a truly unique and powerful image there.” I clipped that one. SOmeday I will get back to Paris.
    Keep up the great work!

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Anytime Lonnie :D

  • http://www.lightcapturestudio.net patrick

    after you got to play with the M9 and 35lux. what are you going to do now? are you thinking about buying that same kit? or looking for a different gateway into acquiring a Leica?

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Perhaps a different gateway Pat ;)

  • http://www.photosfromthetopfloor.blogspot.com Carsten / topfloor

    As I had to cancel my Paris trip I had planned for june, I am looking forward to return next year to the city of lights. Your pictures show the potential the city and its inhabitants have photographically. Thx for sharing!

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      No problem Carsten– you would have the time of your life :)

  • http://jack070photo.wordpress.com/ Jacek Smoter

    Great, as always. Well-listed the advantages of rangefinders. Going to get yourself the M9? :D

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Hope so — but too poor now ;)

  • Michael

    Great photos and interesting stories behind them. I will see to get the analog Leica of my father in my hands soon. The only drawback for you is that you have to hand back the Leica M9 right?

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Unfortunately yes :(

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/minneapolispics/?saved=1 Tom

    Go to the 4:44 minute part of the video and see a 20 second gimps of Gary Winogrand using body language to misdirect attention while photographing. He’s shooting pictures between the shots he wants people to think he’s taking.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eitfGxc6vbw

    • Corinne Standish

      All the videos about Winogrand are interesting. Notice how he smiles and looks friendly when he’s out shooting. People will respond positively to that more than a serious ‘photographer attitude.’

      Love his filing system. He just puts the rolls in big plastic bags and stuffs them into file drawers, lol.

  • http://www.wanderinglulu.com Ewanglee

    Nice article. More interesting is the responses from everyone which has nothing to do with Leica but more to do with the concept of street photography. Never thought how many people didn’t really like street photography per se. Whether it’s street portraits or street photography, it’s all about capturing people in their normal every day environment. I think we humans are naturally curious and fascinated by other people. We people watch when we sit in public places. We go to museums to look at exhibits of photos or paintings or sculptures of people in their environment of the past. We buy books to have those images in within our reach. The internet simply shares it in a faster more universal way. In general those paintings or photos don’t mock the unknowing subject. I think we have to loosen up and enjoy the human race. It’s definitely a better option than the countless photos or paintings of human suffering. :-)

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Thanks for the insightful comment Ewanglee–think you hit the head on the nail :)

  • http://fotofungi.wordpress.com Will

    I’ve saved and saved and have enough to buy the M9 now, I foudn a local vendor that had one in stock, tried it and found I was terrible at focusing, so much so that I couldn’t buy it. I want the M9 because it’s small and portable and still FF for great DoF shots, however, being that i’m annoyed at how slow my E-P2 focuses, I certainly would be annoyed at how slow I could focus on the M9…

    It made me really think about Leica… it’s strange how there’s no real bad opinions out there on them but yet I didn’t buy it… On the plus side now I have enough money to get every lens I want for m43 and a decent upgrade in the next few months.

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      The secret: prefocus to 1.2 meters, shoot at f/16, and all your shots will be in focus ;)

  • http://www.nevervoid.com Antony Pratap

    Great shots! Very inspiring, and yes like the others said, Paris is the place!

  • Andy Hinton

    Lovely article and eulogy to the rangefinder Eric. Need to go out with the Voigtlander again soon!

    I must say that I much prefer the shots at the top and those like the bus-shelter and subway to the Gilden type shots. I am starting to think that my prior enthusiasm for Bruce Gilden’s work was maybe swayed by two famous shots I love (the Japanese mafia and the lighting cigarette at wedding shot) as I am starting to find the ‘surprised look’ shots don’t really say anything to me.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/rannt/ Ricky

    Shame that you had to mention the self-proclaimed-god-of-street-photography chris weeks. That poor guy is way too self-centered for his mediocre street work.

    Glad you had a good experience in Paris as well as with a Leica. You are now a changed man.

    -ricky

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Thanks Ricky–it was an eye-opening experience. And I admire Chris…the brother has true passion :)

  • Michel Desjardins

    Hello,

    Just discovered your site. Love your photos. I just wonder why you feel like the vast majority of them have to be in BW? Leica (as far as I know since I use a GF1 and a D700 for street photos) has great colors. I have spent years doing street photos (mostly in Paris and Munich) and always felt the photos looked more “street” as they were, in color. Not sure that HCB would have shot in BW if he would have had access to modern camera that can shoot at 6400 iso in color without noise…Of course, this is just my opinion and have to admit that your pictures look great in BW!

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Hey Michel– I prefer black and white, but color is great for street photography as well :)

  • http://Www.blork.org/streetscene/ Ed Hawco

    Really nice shots from Paris, Eric. It’s interesting to note that most of them are framed vertically. I wonder if that’s an indication of a different way of thinking when shooting with the Leica?

    • http://www.erickimphotography.com Eric Kim

      Interesting observation Ed– perhaps it is ;)

Previous post:

Next post:

"Like" me on Facebook!