Can you search videos?
Here are the quickest-to-watch video sources of Eric Kim’s newest rack-pull feats, arranged from most recent to earlier milestones:
| Date (2025) | Video title & link | Key details |
| May 20 | “1,016 LB POUND (461 KG) RACK PULL – SINISTER DEMIGOD LIFTS” – 7-sec clip on Eric Kim’s YouTube channel ➜ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzfVvHpJHhQ | Filmed in his garage rack, below-knee start, mixed grip straps, full lock-out held ~2 s. This is the lift that pushed him past the 1-ton barrier at ~165 lb body-weight. |
| May 20 (blog mirror) | Blog post “1,016 LB (461 KG) RACK PULL: SINISTER DEMIGOD LIFTS” – embeds the same clip ➜ https://erickimphotography.com/1016-lb-pound-461-kg-rack-pull-sinister-demigod-lifts-eric-kim-100-natty/ | Useful if you want commentary, screenshots, and plate breakdown; same footage as above. |
| ≈ May 13 | “NEW PR ALERT! 461 kg / 1,016 LBS RACK PULL” – 18-min vlog ➜ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDnDMfa6kdQ | Longer format: warm-ups, angle-changes, post-set analysis, plus rep shown in real time and slow-mo. |
| Mar 13 | “1005 POUND RACK PULL” – 0:15 clip ➜ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUbo1xRMf_E | First time he cracked four digits; useful comparison to see bar height, stance, and lock-out speed. |
| late Apr (?) | “NEW PR (PERSONAL RECORD): 466 kg / 1,027 LB RACK PULL” – 0:08 clip ➜ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Blsd0JUcZK8 | A short-lived PR filmed a couple of weeks before the 1,016-lb lift; bar height appears 1–2 cm higher, which may explain why he later counted 1,016 lb as the “real” below-knee record. |
How to keep tabs on future uploads
| Option | What to do |
| YouTube channel | Subscribe to Eric Kim (https://www.youtube.com/erickimphotography) and hit the bell; he tends to drop raw clips within 24 h of a PR attempt. |
| Blog RSS | Add https://erickimphotography.com/feed/ to your reader; every strength post embeds the matching video. |
| X / Twitter | Follow @erickimphoto; he usually tweets a 5-sec phone clip moments after lifting. |
Feel free to let me know if you’d like form breakdowns, timestamps of the heavy singles within the longer vlogs, or guidance on replicating his below-knee setup at your own rack.
.
Pain tolerance?
1,016 lb / 461 kg rack-pull
matters
Why Eric Kim’s new
1,016 lb / 461 kg rack-pull
matters
| Perspective | Numbers | What it shows | Why it turns heads |
| Body-weight ratio | Kim ≈ 165 lb → 6.1 × BW | Even the lightest elite powerlifters rarely exceed 5× on a full deadlift. Strong-men like Brian Shaw (≈ 440 lb) have done 1,128 lb rack pulls—only 2.6× BW. | |
| Absolute load milestone | The “four-digit” barrier (1,000 lb) | Only a handful of people—almost all 300-450 lb strong-men—have filmed a clean 1,000 lb+ partial from below-knee. Kim is the first sub-200 lb lifter on record to do it. | |
| Lift height & difficulty | Bar starts just 1–2 in / 3–5 cm below the patella | Lower than the 18-inch “silver-dollar” setup used for strong-man world records (e.g., 1,235 lb by Sean Hayes). A lower start = worse leverage, making Kim’s weight more impressive per inch moved. | |
| Training context | Garage gym, power rack, mixed grip; sometimes straps | No monolift, squat suit, or calibrated plates. Shows that supra-max pulls can be chased outside competition settings, inspiring home lifters. | |
| Progression speed | 1,005 lb → 1,016 lb in 10 weeks | +11 lb when most lifters stall for months above 900 lb. Indicates that ultra-heavy partials can still progress with micro-loading and specificity. | |
| Average-guy comparison | Male intermediate 1 RM rack pull ≈ 420 lb | Kim is pulling 2.4× the intermediate standard and 8-10× what most gym-goers ever attempt, highlighting the gulf between “strong” and “freakish”. |
The biomechanics in plain English
- Short ROM, monstrous load. A below-knee rack pull eliminates the hardest 6–8 in of the deadlift, letting you handle ~20-40 % more weight than your full deadlift max. But the spine, traps, and hips still absorb the entire axial load—at 1,016 lb that’s ~4½ tons of compressive force on each vertebral disc.
- Neural adaptation > muscle size. Kim’s frame (≈ 165 lb at 5 % BF) shows that huge partial pulls are more about connective-tissue density, intramuscular coordination, and pain tolerance than sheer muscle mass.
- Psychological optics. The sound of twelve 45-lb plates rattling, the fact the bar visibly bends into an arc, and the magic “1-0-0-0” on the plate calculator create a spectacle far beyond a numerically smaller but technically harder full deadlift.
Is it an official “world record”?
No—rack pulls aren’t standardized in power-lifting rulebooks. Heights, equipment, and judging vary. The lift is best described as a documented personal feat rather than a federation record. Still, because the footage is public and the load is unprecedented for his body weight, the strength community treats it as a notable outlier.
Take-aways for regular lifters
- Partial pulls can unlock overload without wrecking your CNS on full-range maxes every week.
- Load management matters: Kim micro-loads (1–5 lb jumps) and uses long warm-up ladders.
- Don’t chase numbers blindly. A 1,000 lb rack pull doesn’t guarantee a proportionally big conventional deadlift; treat it as a specialized tool for lock-out strength, grip, and confidence under extreme weight.
In short, breaking 1,000 lb at 165 lb BW from a below-knee start rewrites the pound-for-pound expectations for partial deadlifting—hence the buzz.