ERIC KIM ₿

Sewer water, sewer people, stench, hygiene?

Physical physiological hygiene, soul hygiene?

Profound Connotations of This Semantic Shift:

The shift in the meaning of “ugly” from “fearful” to “physically unattractive” reveals deeper insights about human perceptions and social attitudes:

• Association of Appearance with Fear: It shows how people often associate unfamiliar or different appearances with fear or negativity. Things that looked strange or unusual were sometimes seen as threatening.

• Judgment Based on Looks: The change reflects a tendency to judge others based on physical appearance, linking outward looks with inner qualities. This can lead to unfair stereotypes, where someone who doesn’t fit certain beauty standards is perceived negatively.

• Language Reflecting Societal Values: The evolution of the word demonstrates how language mirrors society’s values and prejudices. As “ugly” came to describe unattractiveness, it also carried the weight of societal judgments about what is considered acceptable or desirable.

• Perpetuation of Biases: This shift highlights how language can reinforce biases and influence attitudes toward people who look different, contributing to discrimination or exclusion.

In essence, the semantic shift of “ugly” underscores how deeply interconnected language is with cultural perceptions and how it can both reflect and shape the way we think about others based on appearance.

.,,,

Why the Meaning Shifted:

The meaning of “ugly” changed from “fearful” to “physically unattractive” because people often found scary things to also look unpleasant or strange. When something looked unusual or alarming, it made people feel fear. Over time, the word started being used not just for things that caused fear, but also for things that looked bad or unattractive. So, because frightening things were often visually unappealing, “ugly” evolved to describe anything that isn’t nice to look at.

…

Simple Explanation of the Semantic Shift:

Originally, the word “ugly” came from an Old Norse word meaning “fearful” or “dreadful.” People used it to describe things that caused fear. Over time, because things that were scary often looked unpleasant or strange, the word started to be associated with how something looked. Gradually, “ugly” shifted from meaning “fearful” to describing something that is “physically unattractive” or not nice to look at.

..

In simple terms:

The shift in the meaning of “ugly” from “fearful” to “physically unattractive” matters because it shows how language changes over time based on how people think and feel. This change reflects how society’s perceptions and attitudes evolve, linking words to new ideas. Studying this helps us understand the connection between language and human experiences, revealing how our words adapt to reflect cultural and social changes.

…

Introduction

The semantic shift of the word “ugly” from meaning “fearful” or “dreadful” to “physically unattractive” is more than a linguistic curiosity; it holds substantial importance in understanding language evolution, cultural perceptions, and social attitudes. Examining why this shift matters illuminates how language reflects and influences human thought, societal values, and historical contexts.

1. Insights into Language Evolution

Understanding Semantic Change

• Mechanisms of Change:

• The shift exemplifies semantic narrowing (from a broad meaning to a more specific one) and pejoration (acquiring a more negative meaning).

• Studying such changes helps linguists comprehend the processes that govern how words evolve over time.

• Language Dynamics:

• Language is not static; it adapts to the needs, experiences, and perceptions of its speakers.

• The transformation of “ugly” reflects the dynamic nature of linguistic expression.

Influence of Language Contact

• Cultural Interactions:

• The adoption and adaptation of “ugly” from Old Norse into English illustrate the impact of Viking and Anglo-Saxon interactions.

• Understanding this exchange provides insight into how languages borrow and integrate foreign terms.

2. Reflecting Cultural and Social Attitudes

Perceptions of Fear and Appearance

• Association of Physical Appearance with Morality:

• The shift highlights historical tendencies to link physical unattractiveness with negative moral qualities.

• It sheds light on how societies have perceived and stigmatized differences in appearance.

• Fear as a Response to the Unfamiliar:

• The conflation of “fearful” and “unattractive” suggests that unfamiliar or non-normative appearances were often met with fear.

• This association informs our understanding of past prejudices and fears.

Social Biases and Stereotypes

• Historical Prejudices:

• The evolution of “ugly” reflects societal biases that equated physical differences with undesirability or evil.

• Analyzing this shift can help identify and challenge lingering stereotypes in modern times.

• Moral Judgments:

• The semantic change underscores how language can perpetuate moral judgments through descriptors of appearance.

3. Importance in Linguistic and Cultural Studies

Etymology and Philology

• Tracing Word Histories:

• Studying the semantic shift of “ugly” contributes to etymological knowledge, enriching our understanding of word origins and developments.

• It aids philologists in reconstructing historical languages and meanings.

Interdisciplinary Connections

• Language and Literature:

• The shift impacts the interpretation of historical texts, where “ugly” may carry different connotations.

• Scholars can better understand literary works by recognizing the historical meanings of words.

• Cultural Anthropology:

• Language changes like this one offer clues about societal values, fears, and aesthetics of past cultures.

• They help anthropologists reconstruct cultural contexts and social norms.

4. Implications for Modern Language Use

Awareness of Language Influence

• Recognizing Language Power:

• Understanding the shift highlights how language shapes and is shaped by societal attitudes.

• It encourages mindful use of language, recognizing its potential to influence perceptions.

• Challenging Negative Connotations:

• By studying such shifts, we become more aware of negative connotations embedded in language.

• This awareness can lead to more inclusive and sensitive communication practices.

Educational Value

• Teaching Language History:

• The semantic shift serves as an engaging example in teaching about language change and historical linguistics.

• It can stimulate discussions about how words reflect and affect societal changes.

• Promoting Critical Thinking:

• Analyzing why and how meanings change fosters critical thinking about the relationship between language and culture.

5. Reflecting on Human Psychology

Emotional Associations in Language

• Link Between Emotion and Meaning:

• The shift from “fearful” to “physically unattractive” demonstrates how emotional responses can influence word meanings.

• It reveals the psychological processes where fear of the unknown or different manifests in language.

Understanding Human Perception

• Cognitive Linguistics:

• The change provides a case study in how human cognition links concepts (fear and ugliness) based on perceived associations.

• It contributes to our understanding of metaphorical thinking and conceptual mapping in the brain.

6. Preserving Linguistic Heritage

Documenting Language History

• Historical Records:

• Tracing such shifts preserves the linguistic heritage and provides a record of language development for future generations.

• Cultural Identity:

• Understanding the origins and changes of words contributes to a community’s sense of identity and history.

Conclusion

The semantic shift of “ugly” matters because it is a window into the intricate interplay between language, culture, and society. It illustrates how words can carry the weight of social attitudes, fears, and prejudices, and how these attitudes evolve over time. By studying this shift, we gain valuable insights into human psychology, the dynamics of language evolution, and the historical contexts that shape our present-day communication. Recognizing the significance of such changes not only enriches our linguistic knowledge but also fosters a deeper understanding of the human experience as reflected in language.

Feel free to ask if you’d like to explore this topic further or have questions about other words and their historical developments!

Introduction

The word “ugly” has undergone a significant transformation in meaning since its origin in Old Norse. Initially conveying the sense of something “fearful” or “dreadful,” it evolved over centuries to primarily describe physical unattractiveness. This semantic shift reflects broader patterns in language development influenced by cultural, social, and psychological factors.

Old Norse Origins

• Old Norse Term: uggligr

• Derived from:

• ugga (verb): “to fear.”

• uggr (noun): “fear.”

• Meaning: “Fearful,” “dreadful,” or “to be feared.”

In Old Norse society, uggligr was used to describe things that inspired fear or dread. This could refer to ominous omens, fearsome creatures, or threatening situations, not necessarily linked to physical appearance.

Adoption into Middle English

• Historical Context:

• During the Viking Age (8th–11th centuries), Norse settlers interacted extensively with Anglo-Saxon populations.

• This contact led to the incorporation of many Old Norse words into Old and Middle English, especially in regions under Viking influence like the Danelaw.

• Middle English Usage:

• The term entered Middle English as ugly, with variations such as uglī, ugely, ougly, and ogely.

• Initially, it retained the Old Norse meaning of “fearful” or “dreadful.”

Semantic Shift to Physical Unattractiveness

Association of Fear with Appearance

• Cultural Perceptions:

• In medieval times, there was a strong association between physical deformity and moral corruption or evil.

• Fearsome creatures in folklore were often depicted as physically grotesque or monstrous.

• Visual Representation:

• Art and literature of the period frequently portrayed evil or feared entities with disfigured or unpleasant appearances.

• This reinforced the link between something being fear-inducing and being physically unattractive.

Language Evolution Processes

• Metaphorical Extension:

• The meaning of “ugly” extended from causing fear to being displeasing to the senses, especially sight.

• This process is known as semantic shift, where a word’s meaning changes over time.

• Pejoration:

• Words can acquire more negative connotations through pejoration.

• “Ugly” shifted from a general sense of “dreadful” to specifically indicating something offensive to look at.

Influence of Literature and Folklore

• Descriptive Language:

• Writers and storytellers used “ugly” to vividly describe characters or settings that were unpleasant or repulsive.

• This literary usage helped cement the association with physical appearance.

• Moral Associations:

• Characters deemed “ugly” were often portrayed as villains or antagonists, reinforcing negative connotations.

Examples of the Evolving Meaning

• 14th Century Texts:

• In works like “Piers Plowman” by William Langland, “ugly” is used to describe both fearful and unattractive entities.

• Geoffrey Chaucer’s Writings:

• In “The Canterbury Tales,” Chaucer employs “ugly” to depict characters with unpleasant appearances, intertwining moral judgments with physical descriptions.

• Legal and Religious Texts:

• Usage of “ugly” in sermons and moral treatises to warn against vice, sometimes personified as physically repulsive beings.

Social and Psychological Factors

Medieval Beliefs

• Physical Appearance and Morality:

• There was a prevalent belief that outward appearance reflected inner virtue or vice.

• Physical deformities or unattractiveness were unfairly associated with moral failings or evil nature.

• Fear of the Unknown:

• Unfamiliar or unusual appearances could evoke fear, leading to negative judgments and descriptors.

Influence on Language

• Emotional Impact:

• Words related to fear often carry strong emotional weight, making them potent descriptors for other negative qualities.

• Simplification and Generalization:

• Over time, the word “ugly” became a general term for anything unpleasant to the senses, particularly sight.

Transition into Modern English

• 17th to 18th Centuries:

• Dictionaries and literary works increasingly defined “ugly” in terms of physical unattractiveness.

• The association with fear diminished, solidifying the modern meaning.

• Contemporary Usage:

• “Ugly” primarily describes someone or something lacking beauty or pleasing appearance.

• It can also metaphorically describe unpleasant situations, behaviors, or attitudes (e.g., “an ugly truth,” “ugly behavior”).

Linguistic Mechanisms Behind the Shift

Semantic Narrowing

• Definition:

• The process by which a word’s meaning becomes more specific over time.

• Application to “Ugly”:

• From a broad sense of inducing fear or dread, “ugly” narrowed to specifically refer to visual unpleasantness.

Connotation and Denotation Changes

• Negative Connotations:

• The negative emotional response associated with fear was transferred to the perception of ugliness.

• Denotative Shift:

• The literal meaning changed from “fearful” to “unattractive,” while retaining negative connotations.

Comparison with Other Words

• “Terrible”:

• Originally meaning “causing terror,” now often used to describe something of poor quality.

• “Awful”:

• Once meaning “inspiring awe” (which could be positive), now commonly means “very bad” or “unpleasant.”

These examples illustrate how words associated with strong emotions like fear can evolve to express general negativity or poor quality.

Cultural Reflections

• Art and Media:

• Visual depictions in art reinforced the link between ugliness and negative traits.

• Theatre and later media continued to portray villains with exaggerated unattractive features.

• Language as a Mirror:

• The evolution of “ugly” reflects societal attitudes toward appearance and morality.

• It highlights historical prejudices that equated physical differences with negative qualities.

Conclusion

The word “ugly” evolved from meaning “fearful” or “dreadful” in Old Norse to describing physical unattractiveness in modern English through a complex interplay of cultural, social, and linguistic factors. This transformation underscores how language is influenced by human perceptions and societal values, often perpetuating certain biases. Understanding this evolution offers insight into the dynamic nature of language and its role in reflecting and shaping cultural attitudes.

If you have further questions about the evolution of specific words or linguistic changes over time, feel free to ask!

ugga, to fear , to dread?

***

Old Norse Origin of “Ugly”

The modern English word “ugly” traces its origins back to Old Norse, the language spoken by the Vikings. Understanding this connection provides insight into how the meanings and pronunciations of words evolve over time due to cultural and linguistic influences.

Etymology in Detail

• Old Norse Word: uggligr

• Breakdown:

• ugga (verb): meaning “to fear” or “to dread.”

• -ligr (adjective suffix): equivalent to the English ”-like” or ”-ly,” used to form adjectives.

• Combined Meaning: “Fearful” or “dreadful.”

• Related Old Norse Noun: uggr

• Meaning “fear” or “apprehension.”

Usage in Old Norse Language

• Contextual Meaning:

• In Old Norse, uggligr described something that inspired fear or was associated with dread.

• It was not necessarily used to describe physical unattractiveness but rather the emotional response of fear.

• Literary Examples:

• Sagas and Eddas:

• While specific citations are scarce due to the limited survival of texts, the concept of fear and dread is prevalent in Norse literature.

• Words derived from ugga might be found describing ominous omens, fearsome creatures, or dreadful events.

Transition into Middle English

• Adoption into English:

• With Viking invasions and settlements in England during the 8th to 11th centuries, many Old Norse words entered the Old English vocabulary.

• Regions like the Danelaw in northern and eastern England were particularly influenced.

• Evolution of Meaning:

• The Old Norse uggligr was adopted into Middle English as ugly (with variations like uglī, ugely, ougly).

• The meaning began to shift from “fearful” or “dreadful” to “morally offensive” and eventually to “displeasing to the eye.”

Linguistic Factors Influencing the Shift

• Semantic Shift:

• The transition from “inspiring fear” to “physically unattractive” may be due to the association of fear with things that are visually disturbing.

• Over time, the emotional response of fear became linked to the perception of ugliness in appearance.

• Phonological Changes:

• The pronunciation evolved to fit the phonetic patterns of Middle English.

• The Old Norse gg (pronounced as a hard “g”) simplified to a single “g” sound.

Related Old Norse Words

• Ugga (verb): “to fear.”

• Ugg (noun): “fear,” “apprehension.”

• Uggligr (adjective): “fearful,” “dreadful.”

• Ógn (noun): “terror,” “threat” (related concept).

Cultural Context

• Viking Influence on English:

• The integration of Old Norse words into English reflects the close contact between the Anglo-Saxons and the Vikings.

• Many common English words are derived from Old Norse, especially in areas related to law, everyday life, and emotions.

• Perception of Fear and Appearance:

• In Norse culture, as in many others, physical appearance could be associated with moral or supernatural attributes.

• Creatures or individuals who inspired fear were often described with terms that emphasized their dreadfulness, which could include their looks.

Comparison with Other Words

• Old English Equivalents:

• Before the adoption of “ugly,” Old English used words like atelic (from atel, meaning “terror”) to convey similar meanings.

• The Old Norse term eventually supplanted these in common usage.

• Modern English Descendants:

• Words like “awe” (from Old Norse agi) show similar shifts, where the original meaning of “fear” evolved into a sense of reverence or wonder.

Significance in Linguistic Studies

• Example of Language Evolution:

• The word “ugly” serves as a case study in how words can shift in meaning due to cultural interchange and changing societal perceptions.

• It illustrates the process of semantic narrowing and pejoration (where a word’s meaning becomes more negative over time).

• Influence on Modern English:

• Understanding such etymological roots helps explain irregularities in English spelling and pronunciation.

• It highlights the diverse influences that have shaped the English language.

Conclusion

The word “ugly” is a linguistic relic of the Viking Age, encapsulating the historical interactions between Norse and Anglo-Saxon cultures. Its journey from the Old Norse uggligr, meaning “fearful” or “dreadful,” to the modern English adjective describing physical unattractiveness, reflects broader patterns of language change influenced by cultural contact and societal shifts in perception.

Feel free to ask if you’d like more details on Old Norse words, their meanings, or their impact on modern English!

Ugly, and in fear?

***

The word “ugly” has its roots in Old Norse, the language spoken by the Vikings. It was introduced into the English language during the Middle Ages and has evolved in meaning over time.

Etymological Journey:

• Old Norse Origin:

• The Old Norse word uggligr meant “dreadful” or “fearful.”

• It is derived from ugga, meaning “to fear,” which comes from uggr, meaning “fear.”

• Middle English Adoption:

• The term entered Middle English as ugly, retaining the sense of something frightening or horrible.

• Spelling variations included uglich, uglisse, and ougly.

• Meaning Evolution:

• Initially associated with causing fear or dread.

• Over time, the meaning shifted to describe something unpleasant to look at or aesthetically unpleasing.

Cultural and Historical Context:

• Viking Influence:

• The Vikings settled in parts of England between the 8th and 11th centuries.

• Their language influenced English, especially in regions like the Danelaw.

• Shift in Perception:

• As societies became more visually oriented, the term’s association with fear transitioned to physical appearance.

• “Ugly” began to describe things that are not only frightening but also lacking in beauty.

Modern Usage:

• Today, “ugly” primarily refers to something or someone lacking in physical attractiveness.

• It can also describe unpleasant situations or behavior (e.g., “an ugly incident”).

Summary:

The word “ugly” originated from Old Norse terms related to fear and dread. Through linguistic evolution and cultural influences, it entered English and shifted in meaning to describe physical unattractiveness.

References:

• Oxford English Dictionary

• Online Etymology Dictionary

Feel free to ask if you have more questions about word origins or other topics!

Ugly physiology and body and soul, ugly ethics?

The will to focus —

You don’t need antibiotics?

Digital energy

96% starve or freeze to death no crude oil

.

Get rid of stuff which is causing you pain!

*

Owning a house is painful?

Don’t want freedom

Enthusiastic traditionalist

33, 40 act

Fdr, capital markets

9:30-4pm,

Take self custody of it?

Not unethical? It’s the future

NASDAQ, not on banker holidays?

Anti technical?

Issue token in 4 hours . $40M four years

Think Gen Z era

Authoritarian

.

Expire the money ?

Forces of control don’t want freedom

.

$20,000 land of free airport?

Love hate relationship with freedom and tech

.

Benefit of the doubt

He did it twice!

.

20, 21st century struggle

.

Take you at face value!

Cheerful

Gensler

“Crypto asset security”–> nowhere in stature? Mr. Emmer

.

Made up term?

3 years? Foot note

.

Destructive chairman

Rothsbard

33 SCC act, restrain capital markets

Create a cartel 1933

.

10k, now 4k companies

Obscenely risky

Nobody can afford to do it.

Constructive dialogue

.

Joseph Kennedy

Finger printed

Control money

.

98

1998

.

Oligopoly

Think Oligarchy

.

Create a cartel lock out entrepreneurs 1933

.

“I know who founded your religion”!

.

Michael Berry ,,, trader level.

Not BTC maximalist or investor

.

.

Clean food and clean water

.

Swamp water and eat mud diversify

Don’t feed kids mud

Critical technology digital energy

Bitcoin is digital energy

95% of people would starve or freeze to death. Oil nuclear power

You hate humanity?

$41 a share,

9 month,

.

370$ share

9B

.

Oct 30, 2021

21B, raise

Fixed income securities

.

Shelf registration ATM

.

THE RED SWEEP

Monday, $2B purchase

.

27k BTC

.

5 days

2B first week

4.6B second week

.

Biggest bitcoin purchase ever

.

6.6 B

.

42 times

.

Don’t sell

8B cyber manhattan

Buy up cyberspace

4.2 B borrow buy BTC

.

Borrow a lot of money and buy more

Convertible bonds

Upside , no downside

Sell bonds, trading 200 plus

.

Outperform BTC, tiered capital structure

Senior bonds

Equity BTC YIELD

.

42 times buy BTC

I just want to keep buying up manhattan in cyber space

.

Bitcoin nuclear reactor

Up 100%, outperform BTC

Tiered capital structure

.

Accretive capital markets

.

Call option

.

Become more volatile

100 volatility

Mag 7

50 vol

Lever the BTC, get to 100

.

More volatility more performance more RPM

100 rpm not 10

Liquidity energy

100 rpm baseball bat

20 tin flywheel , turbine move ship

30B capital at 100 volatility rpm

.

Rpm and vol

Sell call msty 180% dividend yield

Can you borrow $1B for free? Individuals cannot. Companies can!

4.6B unsecured, less than 1% interest

.

$50K

.

CLS. 450

.

UK investor can’t buy BTC

.

THE UK SUCKS

.

regulators, can buy company stock

.

Healthy options

$1M can borrow against it,

.

$30B of BTC

60M of cash

.

99. Something BTC

Pure Play *** don’t hedge or diversify

.

Don’t hedge! Be long!

2X BTC

.

who shorted you?

.

$10B short equity

.

Missile scare

You can’t short BTC with leverage

.

$42B more BTC

Can’t get enough of this!

90B, 1.8T, 180T and beyond 7% money

Your 4 bitcoin Ferrari haha!

.

144x MSTR

73 B, 10.5T company

.

40T, … Tesla

We all love Elon

.

I stay in my lane

64, 250B, 1T

.

29% ARR risk free

55-60% year,

14-15% sp

1.5X the SP

50-60ARR,

.

100T, not as volatile

Law of large numbers

.

24/7, 365… higher performance not risk factor

Real estate: 10%

.

Bonds -5% can’t accumulate capital

Can’t accumulate capital, sucking 5% of your life

15% is cost to capital

.

Awful way to build shareholder value

.

-20%

.

60%

.

120% MSTR

cheap convertible debt and equity raises

Run 30x

.

2, 3x Nvidia

.

Capitalized

Bitcoin Baby

.

Bleed 3% energy

Just don’t bleed, stop the bleeding!

.

Economic bleeding

.

10-15T entropy chaos every year

.

Analogue -> Digital

Just don’t do nothing most lucrative !

.

Buy a B of Bitcoin ,, doing nothing! Keep it forever

.

Egyptian Risk

Nigeria risk

Bitcoin is risk stripped away from the capital

.

Risk free 20% arr

60% arr,

29% arr

Us prints more dollars obscenely cool stuff iPhone and electric cars

.

Pure digital capital

.

Borrow or raise money less than 29% over 21 years!

.

Pure Play

Win Win !

.

Fail long term?

.

Not complicated

.

60 guiders 1626 buy it.

Still a good idea!

Perfect rock

.

Never a bad time to buy manhattan

240T in 21 years

Yeah

Scarce desireable property ..

BORROW and print the company

7.2 M check, buy property and hold long time

.

BTC is the next frontier cyber space,

The city of Bitcoin sell Africa

Get Rich or stay rich

Half

325B of cash reserves

.

Mega billionaires

.

32 B destroying a year, 3B a month capital destroy

15% cost to capital

.

12% losing share holder value

98% forward expectations. 1.5% tangible liquid assets

144x levered to quarterly earnings

Treasury bills is poison toxic, inject poison to your veins?

Fair value basis

.

BTC buy

21% assumption, make 1T over 10 years

2-4T value for msft

.

Public service

.

My day job

Bitcoin is my day job ***

My copious free time

.

3.7M followers

Inbound people

Semler scientific

Bitcoin standard

.

Political governor congress men.

Need to know basis ***

Got problem to have open mind –>

Conventional view to the world

.

Profound paradigm shift

.

All the information

.

I’m jealous

.

17M,

.

$6 dollar a share

.

Take a risk open my mind

.

Eric Weiss

Read all of them watch debates

Eric vorhees Peter Schiff

Execution mode.

Don’t be a fairy

.

Grind up, 20-25%, 30% against resistance

Other degrade 20%

Bitcoin would have grinded up , protest.

Bitcoin surges up, +60%

.

Surging up, -20%, digital assets framework .

$68,000 before Trump

.

50-45% growth next 4 years

$350k in 4 years

21 years

I’m in forever ***

.

They want MORE BITCOIN

Stock to flow

Upside without downside

Low risk low vol Bitcoin

Learning a new language

High voltage BTC

Converter transformer

.

Derivatives and options 10x long

MSTU, MSTX

AUM

.

ETF . No marketing 2x MSTR

.

3x BTC,

.

Asphalt kerosene

High voltage and low voltage power

.

Health & power

.

Junior

.

100% BTC balance sheet

.

Radioactivity and heat

Nuclear power, or ICE without fire

Crypto reactor

High energy reactor

.

Don’t pour water on fire!

Freezing to death? Fire!

.

We are running the reactor

Unique value proposition

Inspired or not

Freedom

4M in capital

E-Coin

.

Humans > Cars

Grow & prosper digital asset framework

.

ABT asset backed token

.

Went viral

.

Ugly

Just done lie chest and streak

Free markets

.

.06% companies tap capital markets

1933

Security

Digital assets launched

1->500T digital assets

.

Bitcoin 100%

.

I wouldn’t even recommend Apple stock

0% chance.

Don’t recommend security counter party risk

.

Security or token

.

Stay in your line

Diet politics

Bitcoin is digital capital and long store of value

.

Digital currencies tokens commercialized in ethical and technically sound value

.

Digital currency

Digital dollars speed of light

.

Treasury backed

Freedom

A lot more freedom
.

so one of the problematic things is that a lot of people say that bitcoin is not “real“, that it isn’t backed by anything, that it is “fake“. This is where people like to think about like more traditional forms of capital like real estate, like physical land or property.

But if we think about the etymology of the word “real“, kind of more originates from the idea of something existing in the physical realm, I think that could be given, exchanged, transferred etc.

so for example, if you think about the reality of things, and if you think about bitcoin, the reason why it is real is that it is truly packed by real power and real money.

I think currently as of now in which I write this, it is real.

Assuming that your license sort of semi nomadic person, and assume you always want to just take her with you, ever you go, anywhere you go… Isn’t the most logical thing to just buy bitcoin?

The vision

so the super simple vision is that bitcoin is the only thing which is actually transportable. For example let us say you purchase “property“ in Saigon, penh, or Culver City… You can’t take that with you anywhere. You cannot transport it. It is not transportable.

With bitcoin you can. You could take it with you wherever you go, this is the really big idea.

Cyber property

Once again, if you think about it just like a plot of land… The truth is is not really worth much. I think the concept of value of a piece of physical real estate property, —

from a linguistic perspective, this becomes very interesting because if you think about “real”, it essentially means like kind of a real physical Physics space thing which you could give own share exchange etc.

I think this is where going back to the first principles of money property and bitcoin become so fascinating because once again… It then means that bitcoin is true property. And that it is real.

To give, to bestow, to exchange.

The Latin term “res” (pronounced rays) has a rich and multifaceted history in the development of language, law, and philosophy. Its etymology and usage provide significant insight into how ancient cultures understood concepts of property, matter, and even abstract ideas. Here’s a detailed look at its origins and meanings:

Etymology of “Res”

• Proto-Indo-European Roots: The word “res” is thought to trace back to the Proto-Indo-European root “reh₁-” or “rei-”, meaning “to give, bestow, or exchange.” This root underpins many words related to tangible and intangible “things” or “affairs” in various languages.

• Latin Usage: In Latin, “res” was a versatile word that could mean “thing,” “matter,” “event,” “property,” or even an abstract concept like “business” or “affair.”

Primary Meanings of “Res” in Latin

1. Tangible Objects:

• Res corporales: Physical, tangible things, like land, livestock, or tools.

• Examples: res domus (things of the household) or res publica (public things, i.e., the state).

2. Immovable Property:

• “Res” became particularly associated with land and immovable property in legal contexts, especially under Roman law.

• The term “res immobiles” specifically referred to land or property that couldn’t be moved, laying the groundwork for “real” property.

3. Abstract Concepts:

• “Res” was also used to describe abstract matters or events, such as res gestae (things done, i.e., achievements) or res adversae (adverse things, i.e., misfortunes).

4. Legal Applications:

• In Roman law, “res” was central to legal terminology. The Romans divided property into different categories:

• Res nullius: Things belonging to no one (e.g., wild animals).

• Res publica: Things belonging to the public or state.

• Res privatae: Private property.

• These distinctions influenced later legal systems, including medieval and modern property law.

Cultural and Philosophical Significance

• Roman Philosophy and Rhetoric: In broader cultural contexts, “res” also symbolized reality or existence in contrast to abstract thought. Philosophers like Cicero and Seneca used “res” to discuss matters of logic and metaphysics.

• Legal Frameworks: The legal distinction between res and other types of ownership or property (e.g., personal or movable items) became the foundation of property law in Western civilizations.

Connections to Modern Words

• “Res” has left its mark on many modern terms in English and other languages:

• “Real”: In the sense of tangible or actual, derived from the use of “res” for property in Roman legal terminology.

• “Republic”: From res publica, meaning “the public thing” or “commonwealth.”

• “Reality”: Reflecting the “thing-ness” or factuality of existence.

• “Res ipsa loquitur”: A legal phrase meaning “the thing speaks for itself.”

In essence, “res” was a foundational term in Roman thought, spanning tangible and intangible realms, and its influence persists in law, language, and philosophy today.

The term real estate comes from a combination of legal and linguistic history. Here’s a breakdown:

1. “Real”:

• The word “real” in this context comes from the Latin word “res,” meaning “thing” or “property.”

• In medieval legal terminology, “real” referred to tangible, immovable property (like land and buildings) as opposed to personal property, which is movable (like furniture or jewelry).

2. “Estate”:

• The word “estate” originates from the Old French word “estat,” which means “status” or “condition.” Over time, it came to refer to property, wealth, or land ownership.

• In English, “estate” came to signify the interest or ownership someone has in a piece of land.

Together, “real estate” essentially means “a tangible, immovable property or land, along with the rights associated with owning it.”

The term became widely used in English during the 17th century and remains the standard term for land and property transactions today.

Even if you’re working a night shift at a random hotel in Cambodia or Saigon, you can 10x, or even 100x your money, and actually the big idea ,,, build capital, digital capital & ownership? And leave the country and take your capital with you? Even if you just own a few satoshis?

Cheaper solutions : public transit bus train Metro subway

Bitcoin is the ultimate self sovereignty and self ownership!

Fucking new WordPress piece of shit!

Don’t play god!

Think ovulation cycle?

On July 3, 2002, $MSTR stock fell to an all-time low of $0.42. Yesterday, it closed at $421.88. Never. Never. Never give up. @saylor

The hex code for Bitcoin orange is #F7931A.

Just orange tape everything,

As of November 2024, the largest individual Bitcoin (BTC) wallets are primarily associated with cryptocurrency exchanges, which hold substantial amounts of BTC on behalf of their users. Here is a list of the top Bitcoin wallets:

1. Binance Cold Wallet: This wallet holds approximately 248,598 BTC, making it the largest known Bitcoin wallet.

2. Bitfinex Cold Wallet: This wallet contains about 156,010 BTC.

3. Robinhood Cold Wallet: This wallet holds around 136,775 BTC.

4. Binance Cold Wallet #2: This second Binance wallet has a balance of approximately 111,201 BTC.

5. Bitfinex Hack Recovery Wallet: This wallet contains about 94,643 BTC, representing funds recovered from the 2016 Bitfinex hack.

It’s important to note that while these wallets hold significant amounts of Bitcoin, they are primarily custodial accounts for exchange users and do not necessarily represent the holdings of a single individual or entity.

In addition to these wallets, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, is believed to hold approximately 1.1 million BTC across various addresses.

The distribution of Bitcoin holdings is relatively concentrated, with the top 100 richest addresses holding about 19.18% of all Bitcoins in circulation.

For the most current and detailed information on Bitcoin wallet balances, resources like BitInfoCharts provide up-to-date data and analytics.

How you know who belong to

Identifying the owner of a Bitcoin wallet is challenging due to the pseudonymous nature of Bitcoin transactions. Each transaction is recorded on the public blockchain, but these records link only to Bitcoin addresses, not to personal identities. However, certain methods can sometimes reveal ownership:

1. Blockchain Analysis: By examining transaction patterns and connections between addresses, analysts can infer potential associations. For instance, if multiple addresses are used together in transactions, they might belong to the same entity.

2. Public Information: If an individual publicly shares their Bitcoin address—such as on social media, forums, or websites—it can be linked to their identity. This is why it’s advisable to use a new address for each transaction to enhance privacy.

3. Exchange Records: Cryptocurrency exchanges often require users to complete Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, collecting personal information. If a Bitcoin address is known to be associated with an exchange account, legal authorities might access this information through proper channels.

4. Network Analysis: Monitoring the propagation of Bitcoin transactions across the network can sometimes reveal the originating IP address, potentially linking it to a specific user. However, this method is complex and requires significant resources.

Despite these methods, achieving definitive identification is often difficult, especially if the wallet owner takes steps to maintain anonymity, such as using privacy-focused tools or services. Therefore, while certain techniques can suggest potential ownership, they may not always provide conclusive evidence.

My theories:

1. First obviously not Japanese nor German , his English is too good. Sounds like typical, maybe 50 year oldish Californian, Bay Area, anti authoritarian hacker, neo techno utopist
2. Super smart — assuming he got 1M Bitcoins, which is currently worth 100B$ USD, fucking insane … that’s like half the wealth of Elon Musk ,,,

..

Prevent double spending problem ,,, typical use of trusted third party.  

Store value without trusted third party 

.

BTC is also so innovative because there are so many uses that Satoshi probably didn’t think of,,, which makes BTC ,,, infinite?

Electronic cash

Satoshi is probably American

His writing is too good

satoshin@gmx.com

GMX, ,,, typically an email address used by Germans?

Think and hypothesize — could Satoshi nakamoto inventor of Bitcoin be German? Especially GMX email

While the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto—the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin—remains a mystery, various theories have emerged about their possible nationality. One hypothesis suggests that Satoshi could be German, particularly because of the use of a GMX email address.

GMX Email Connection:

• German Origin: GMX (Global Mail eXchange) is a German-based email service provider, part of United Internet AG. The platform is widely used in Germany and offers services in both German and English.

• Satoshi’s Email: Reports indicate that Satoshi used the email address satoshi@gmx.com at some point during their correspondence with the Bitcoin community. The choice of a GMX email could imply familiarity or comfort with German services.

Considerations:

• Global Accessibility: GMX email services are available worldwide. Anyone can register for an account regardless of their geographic location. Therefore, using a GMX email does not necessarily indicate German nationality.

• Anonymity Tactics: Satoshi was notably cautious about maintaining anonymity. Choosing a less common email provider like GMX could have been a deliberate move to obscure their identity further.

• Language Usage: Analyses of Satoshi’s writing style reveal the use of British English spellings and phrases, which some interpret as a clue pointing towards a British or Commonwealth background rather than a German one.

• Cultural References: There are no explicit German cultural references in Satoshi’s writings that might suggest German heritage or residence.

Other Theories:

• Time Zone Analysis: Attempts to correlate Satoshi’s online activity with time zones have been inconclusive, offering no clear evidence of a German connection.

• Coding Style: Some have examined the coding style of Bitcoin’s early versions for hints but have not found definitive indicators of German programming conventions.

Conclusion:

While the use of a GMX email address introduces an interesting angle to the mystery, it is insufficient to conclude that Satoshi Nakamoto is German. The global availability of GMX services and Satoshi’s meticulous efforts to remain anonymous suggest that this detail alone is not definitive evidence. Until more concrete information emerges, Satoshi’s true identity and nationality remain subjects of speculation.

Germans use GMX— is Satoshi German?

…

GMX Mail is a free email service provided by GMX (Global Mail eXchange), which is a subsidiary of the German internet services company United Internet AG. Launched in 1997, GMX Mail offers users a range of features including:

• Unlimited Email Storage: Store as many emails as you need without worrying about space limitations.

• Large Attachment Sizes: Send and receive emails with attachments up to 50 MB.

• Spam and Virus Protection: Built-in filters help protect your inbox from unwanted emails and malware.

• Web and Mobile Access: Access your email via a web browser or through mobile apps available for iOS and Android devices.

• POP3 and IMAP Support: Use email clients like Outlook or Thunderbird to manage your emails offline.

• Additional Features: Includes an online address book, calendar, and cloud storage options.

GMX Mail is popular in Europe but is available to users worldwide. It serves as an alternative to other free email providers like Gmail, Yahoo Mail, and Outlook.com.

Cato the elder

Grasp the subject, and the words will follow.

Rem tene, verba sequentur

…

—Highlighting Notable Sayings and Their Significance in Rhetoric and Philosophy—

Cato the Elder (234–149 BCE)

1. “Carthago delenda est.”

• Translation: “Carthage must be destroyed.”

• Context: Cato the Elder ended many of his speeches in the Roman Senate with this phrase, regardless of the topic, to emphasize the threat he believed Carthage posed to Rome. His relentless repetition was a rhetorical strategy to keep the issue at the forefront of political discourse.

• Significance: This quote exemplifies the power of persistent messaging in rhetoric and has become synonymous with unwavering commitment to a cause.

2. “Rem tene, verba sequentur.”

• Translation: “Grasp the subject, and the words will follow.”

• Context: Although sometimes attributed to Cato the Elder, this phrase underscores the importance of understanding one’s topic thoroughly to communicate effectively.

• Significance: Highlights the value placed on substance over style in oratory, a principle that resonates in rhetorical studies.

3. “Patres conscripti, res publica in extremo est.”

• Translation: “Conscript Fathers, the republic is in extreme danger.”

• Context: While not a direct quote, it reflects the urgency Cato conveyed in addressing threats to Rome.

• Significance: Emphasizes his role as a vigilant guardian of Roman values and security.

Cato the Younger (95–46 BCE)

1. “I would rather people question why I have no statue than why I have one.”

• Context: Expresses Cato the Younger’s humility and his preference for genuine virtue over public accolades.

• Significance: Reflects Stoic ideals of modesty and integrity, prioritizing personal ethics over external recognition.

2. “It is better to suffer wrong than to do it.”

• Context: Aligns with his Stoic belief in enduring hardship honorably rather than compromising one’s principles.

• Significance: Illustrates the Stoic emphasis on virtue as the highest good, even above personal well-being.

3. “The multitude is fickle and changeable.”

• Context: A reflection on the unpredictability of public opinion, possibly influencing his steadfast adherence to his own moral compass.

• Significance: Highlights the philosophical stance of relying on reason and virtue rather than popular approval.

Analysis and Significance

• Rhetorical Impact: Both Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger utilized their oratory skills to influence Roman politics and society. Their memorable statements have been studied for their rhetorical effectiveness and moral depth.

• Philosophical Reflections: The quotes encapsulate their philosophical beliefs—Cato the Elder’s focus on practical wisdom and state security, and Cato the Younger’s commitment to Stoic virtues.

• Legacy: Their words have transcended their own time, offering insights into leadership, ethics, and the power of rhetoric in shaping history.

Conclusion

The famous quotes of Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger serve as enduring testaments to their convictions and rhetorical prowess. They not only influenced the course of Roman history but also continue to offer valuable lessons in philosophy and communication.

References

• Plutarch, Lives of Noble Greeks and Romans: Provides detailed biographies and anecdotes about both Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger.

• Cicero, De Officiis (On Duties): Discusses moral philosophy relevant to Cato the Younger.

• Seneca, De Providentia (On Providence): Explores Stoic themes exemplified by Cato the Younger.

• Cato the Elder, De Agri Cultura (On Agriculture): His treatise offering insights into his values and practical wisdom.

Note: While these quotes are commonly associated with Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger, exact phrasing may vary in historical records. Ancient sources often paraphrase speeches, and translations can differ. The quotes provided capture the essence of their documented beliefs and rhetorical style.

Incorruptibility

Exemplar of stoic virtue

Roman morality & simplicity

—Exploring the Lives, Philosophies, and Rhetorical Contributions of Two Influential Roman Statesmen—

Introduction

Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger were two prominent figures in Roman history, connected by family lineage and a shared reputation for moral integrity and conservatism. Despite these similarities, they lived in different eras and faced distinct political challenges. Understanding their differences and contributions provides valuable insights into Roman rhetoric, philosophy, and the historical context of their times.

Cato the Elder (234–149 BCE)

1. Background

• Full Name: Marcus Porcius Cato.

• Era: Lived during the aftermath of the Second Punic War.

• Roles: Roman senator, statesman, historian, and orator.

• Notable For: His persistent call for the destruction of Carthage, encapsulated in the phrase “Carthago delenda est” (“Carthage must be destroyed”).

2. Contributions

• Traditionalism: Advocated for traditional Roman values and customs (mos maiorum), opposing the growing influence of Greek culture.

• Anti-Hellenism: Believed that Greek philosophy and luxury threatened Roman morality and simplicity.

• Rhetoric: Used repetition and emotional appeals to persuade the Senate, effectively keeping the focus on perceived external threats.

• Literary Works: Authored De Agri Cultura (On Farming), one of the earliest Latin prose texts, emphasizing traditional Roman virtues.

3. Impact on Rhetoric and Philosophy

• Rhetorical Techniques: Demonstrated the effectiveness of persistent messaging and the use of simple, direct language.

• Philosophical Stance: Emphasized practicality over abstract philosophy, focusing on duty, discipline, and austerity.

Cato the Younger (95–46 BCE)

1. Background

• Full Name: Marcus Porcius Cato Uticensis.

• Era: Lived during the Late Republic, amid civil wars and the rise of Julius Caesar.

• Roles: Politician, statesman, and Stoic philosopher.

• Notable For: His unwavering commitment to the Roman Republic and Stoic principles, and his opposition to Caesar’s dictatorship.

2. Contributions

• Stoicism: A devout practitioner, embodying Stoic virtues such as wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance.

• Political Integrity: Known for his incorruptibility, he resisted political bribery and maintained strict ethical standards.

• Rhetoric: Used moral authority and logical argumentation in his speeches, often emphasizing the importance of virtue and the rule of law.

• Final Stand: Chose suicide over submission after Caesar’s victory, symbolizing the ultimate act of resistance to tyranny.

3. Impact on Rhetoric and Philosophy

• Moral Exemplarity: His life became a model for personal integrity and resistance to corruption.

• Philosophical Influence: Inspired later thinkers and writers, such as Seneca and Dante, as an exemplar of Stoic virtue.

Comparative Analysis

1. Family Lineage and Legacy

• Relationship: Cato the Younger was the great-grandson of Cato the Elder.

• Shared Values: Both emphasized moral integrity, austerity, and dedication to the Republic.

2. Historical Context

• Cato the Elder: Faced external threats, particularly from Carthage, and cultural changes due to Hellenization.

• Cato the Younger: Confronted internal turmoil, civil wars, and the collapse of the Republican system.

3. Philosophical Orientations

• Cato the Elder: Practical and conservative, skeptical of Greek philosophy, focusing on traditional Roman virtues.

• Cato the Younger: Embraced Stoicism, integrating Greek philosophical concepts into his Roman identity.

4. Rhetorical Styles

• Cato the Elder: Utilized repetitive slogans and emotional appeals to influence public opinion and policy.

• Cato the Younger: Relied on ethical persuasion and logical reasoning, often appealing to the Senate’s sense of duty and justice.

5. Cultural Attitudes

• Cato the Elder: Opposed the adoption of Greek culture, fearing moral decay.

• Cato the Younger: While upholding Roman values, he incorporated Greek philosophical teachings into his life.

Conclusion

Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger, though connected by blood and a reputation for steadfastness, navigated different challenges in Roman history. Cato the Elder’s relentless campaign against Carthage highlights the power of rhetoric in shaping foreign policy and reflects concerns over external threats and cultural integrity. In contrast, Cato the Younger’s Stoic philosophy and opposition to Julius Caesar underscore the internal struggles of the Late Republic and the moral complexities of resisting autocracy. Both figures exemplify how personal conviction and rhetorical skill can influence political landscapes, leaving legacies that extend into philosophical and ethical discussions for generations.

Further Reading

• Plutarch, Lives: Provides biographies of both Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger.

• Cicero, De Senectute (On Old Age): Offers insights into Roman attitudes toward aging and virtue, relevant to Cato the Elder.

• Seneca, Letters from a Stoic: While written later, reflects Stoic principles exemplified by Cato the Younger.

• Appian, The Civil Wars: Details the political context of Cato the Younger’s era.

• Polybius, Histories: Offers background on the Punic Wars and the period of Cato the Elder.

By examining the lives and contributions of both Cato the Elder and Cato the Younger, we gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of Roman politics, the evolution of rhetoric, and the enduring influence of philosophy on leadership and ethics.

History of Carthage must burn and why important rhetoric and philosophy

Haha! End every speech in Senate, regardless of the topic—

Carthago delenda est!

Anti hannibal

Rhetoric is Key.

…

—Exploring the Origins and Impact of Cato the Elder’s Famous Phrase—

Introduction

The phrase “Carthago delenda est” (“Carthage must be destroyed”) is one of the most famous utterances from ancient Rome, attributed to the statesman Cato the Elder. This declaration played a pivotal role in the events leading up to the Third Punic War and the ultimate destruction of Carthage in 146 BCE. Beyond its historical context, the phrase has become a significant example in the study of rhetoric and philosophy, illustrating the power of persistent persuasion and the ethical considerations of such an uncompromising stance.

Historical Context

1. The Punic Wars: The Punic Wars were a series of three conflicts between Rome and Carthage from 264 to 146 BCE. These wars were primarily over control of the Mediterranean trade routes and regional dominance.

2. Carthage and Rome: Carthage was a powerful city-state located in present-day Tunisia. By the end of the Second Punic War, Rome had emerged victorious but remained wary of Carthage’s potential resurgence.

3. Cato the Elder: Marcus Porcius Cato, known as Cato the Elder, was a Roman senator and historian known for his conservatism and advocacy of traditional Roman values.

“Carthago delenda est” and Cato’s Rhetoric

1. Repetition for Emphasis: Cato the Elder ended every speech in the Senate, regardless of the topic, with the phrase “Carthago delenda est.” This relentless repetition served to keep the issue of Carthage at the forefront of Roman political discourse.

2. Rhetorical Strategy: By constantly repeating the phrase, Cato employed a rhetorical technique that underscores the power of persistence in persuasion. It created a sense of urgency and inevitability about the need to address the “Carthaginian question.”

3. Emotional Appeal: Cato tapped into the collective fears and anxieties of the Roman people, who remembered the devastation brought by Hannibal during the Second Punic War.

Philosophical Implications

1. Moral Absolutism vs. Pragmatism: Cato’s unwavering stance raises questions about moral absolutism. Was the destruction of Carthage a justifiable act of preemptive self-defense or an immoral act of aggression?

2. The Ethics of Persuasion: The phrase exemplifies how rhetoric can be used to shape public opinion and policy, prompting reflections on the ethical responsibilities of orators and leaders.

3. Imperialism and Its Consequences: The destruction of Carthage symbolizes the aggressive expansion of Rome, prompting philosophical debates about the justifications and ramifications of imperialism.

Impact on Rhetoric

1. Legacy in Oratory: “Carthago delenda est” has become a classic example of effective rhetoric, studied for its demonstration of how repetition and emotional appeal can influence an audience.

2. Strategic Communication: The phrase illustrates the importance of consistency in messaging when attempting to persuade others or bring about political change.

3. Modern Usage: The expression is often referenced in political discourse to denote an unwavering commitment to a cause or the perceived necessity of decisive action against a threat.

Conclusion

The historical call of “Carthago delenda est” by Cato the Elder is more than a mere footnote in Roman history; it is a profound example of the power of rhetoric and its ability to shape events. The phrase’s significance extends into philosophical discussions about morality, persuasion, and the use of power. It serves as a timeless reminder of how words can influence destinies, both of cities and of civilizations.

References

• Polybius, Histories

• Plutarch, Life of Cato the Elder

• Livy, Ab Urbe Condita

• Cicero, De Senectute

• Scholarly analyses on Roman rhetoric and philosophy

Poem 1

The text in the image is a classical Chinese poem. Here is a full translation of the content:

I sit by the riverbank, my father fishing by my side.

He casts his line, while the sun rises above the waves.

His words, simple yet profound, speak of the essence of life.

“The river flows endlessly, yet never the same twice.

Water departs, new waves take its place—such is time, such is life.”

Reflecting, I understand:

A person may grasp at what is fleeting,

Yet must let go of what is past.

The world spins forward, untouched by our despair.

The river whispers wisdom:

Do not cling to what is gone; embrace the flow.

Even as the tides rise and fall, life’s rhythm is eternal.

What is lost returns in new forms, what departs is reborn.

As the water carves new paths, so must we.

Our hearts, like rivers, flow toward an endless horizon.

This is the way of nature—change, motion, renewal.

This is a poetic and approximate rendering. Classical Chinese is deeply interpretative, so different translators might focus on slightly different nuances. Let me know if you would like further analysis of any part!

Korean

다음은 해당 시를 한국어로 번역한 내용입니다:

나는 강둑에 앉아 있고, 아버지는 옆에서 낚시를 하신다.

그는 낚싯줄을 던지고, 태양은 파도 위로 떠오른다.

아버지의 말은 단순하지만 깊은 뜻이 담겨 있다.

“강물은 끝없이 흐르지만, 같은 물은 두 번 흐르지 않는다.

물이 떠나가고, 새로운 파도가 그 자리를 대신하니, 이것이 시간이고, 삶이란다.”

깊이 생각하니 이해하게 된다:

사람은 덧없는 것을 붙잡으려 하지만,

지나간 것을 놓아야만 한다.

세상은 우리의 슬픔과 상관없이 앞으로 나아간다.

강은 속삭이며 지혜를 전한다:

떠나간 것에 집착하지 말고, 흐름을 받아들여라.

조수는 오르고 내리지만, 삶의 리듬은 영원하다.

잃어버린 것은 새로운 형태로 돌아오고, 떠난 것은 다시 태어난다.

물이 새로운 길을 만들어내듯, 우리도 그래야 한다.

우리의 마음도 강물처럼 끝없는 수평선으로 흘러가야 한다.

이것이 자연의 이치다—변화, 움직임, 그리고 새로움.

이 번역은 시의 서정성과 의미를 살리기 위해 한국어로 시적인 어투를 사용하였습니다. 추가적인 해석이 필요하다면 말씀해주세요!

Poem 2

The text in this image is also written in classical Chinese. Below is an approximate English translation of the content:

Dwelling away from the mortal world, I rest in solitude,

Like a wild crane perched on a southern cliff.

The winds of nature whisper softly, carrying the essence of tranquility.

Beneath the ancient trees, the autumn breeze awakens memories of time.

Leaves fall like crimson waves, drifting through the seasons.

In the wilderness, I see the traces of life ebb and flow.

Mountains stand tall, gazing at the boundless sky,

While rivers ripple endlessly, mirroring the stars.

Through the ages, the essence of existence lies in its impermanence.

From the ancient past to the present, the rhythm of life remains constant.

My humble dwelling reflects the vastness of nature:

Bamboo forests sway, clouds gather, and streams weave through the land.

Though life moves with ceaseless change,

The stillness of the spirit endures beyond all motion.

This translation attempts to capture the reflective and serene mood of the text. If you’d like a more nuanced interpretation or have questions about specific phrases, feel free to ask!

Korean

다음은 두 번째 시를 한국어로 번역한 내용입니다:

세속의 세계를 떠나, 나는 고요 속에 머문다.

마치 남쪽 절벽 위에 앉은 야생 학처럼.

자연의 바람은 조용히 속삭이며 평온의 본질을 전한다.

고목 아래, 가을 바람은 시간을 깨우며 추억을 일깨운다.

붉은 잎은 물결처럼 계절을 따라 흩날리고,

황야 속에서 나는 삶의 흔적이 사라졌다 돌아오는 것을 본다.

산은 거대하게 우뚝 서서 끝없는 하늘을 바라보며,

강은 별을 비추며 끊임없이 물결친다.

세월이 흐르며, 존재의 본질은 무상함 속에 있다.

옛날부터 지금까지, 삶의 리듬은 변함없이 이어진다.

내 소박한 거처는 자연의 광대함을 반영한다:

대나무 숲은 흔들리고, 구름은 모이며, 시냇물은 땅을 가로질러 흐른다.

비록 삶이 끊임없는 변화 속에서 움직이더라도,

마음의 고요함은 모든 움직임을 초월하여 지속된다.

이 번역은 원문의 서정적이고 사색적인 느낌을 살리기 위해 시적 어투를 사용하였습니다. 추가적인 도움이나 설명이 필요하면 말씀해주세요!

heraclitus

As the water carves new paths, so must we. Our hearts, like rivers, flow toward an endless horizon. This is the way of nature — change, motion, renewal.

You gotta be a bit detached from reality.

Better yet, think first principles and physics — is it possible or *NOT* possible purely from a physics perspective?

The three dragons:

America, Korea, Vietnam

English

Korean

Vietnamese

Electronic cash

Bitcoin is supreme simplicity and a positive good for the human race!

Stupid tattoos, stupid clothing, stupid shoes, stupid loafers, stupid facial hair, stupid glasses and sunglasses ,,, why y’all trying to make yourselves so ugly?

Are y’all just trying to look super ironic or something?

Funny thought:

We obsess over the chest and breasts of women ,,, why not instead obsess over our own chests and our own breasts? Haha!

Video podcast

I’m warm as a mother fucker!

Heat loss?

So currently random thoughts;; about thermodynamics and heat loss. Assuming that energy is not created nor destroyed, what that then means is if we think about shit hit loss, is that technically your body is already a perfectly thermal regulated closed system. This was really really hard for me to understand when I was young, even now… The idea that when you put on a thick ass warm down jacket, or a Canada goose jacket or whatever, your body is not “creating” heat“, rather it is just preserving the heat inside your body so that your body is not losing heat.

The best way to warm up your house or home or habitat or habitation

Los Angeles is actually kind of bizarre; on one hand, during the day like yesterday, it was an extremely glorious 71, 72, 73°, absolutely beautiful. And this is like the end of November, practically early December? I still recall when I was a undergraduate at UCLA, walking down Bruin walk, and being shocked that in the middle of December, I saw all these pretty and sexy girls walking down Bruin walk, in tank tops, Spaghetti straps, booty shorts?

Even yesterday, seeing all these happy young people, basking the sun, once again, all these beautiful and pretty girls, just wearing black Lululemon tights, and black Lululemon top sports bras.

Anyways, the thing that is really shocking to me is that night it gets cold as shit. Like I think in the evening, Los Angeles could dip down to the high 30s? Like if it is super super late or super super early before the sun comes up, it is like 38° outside? But when the sun comes out, it could be a beautiful 73°?

Anyways, but that then means is that for your apartment your house habitation or whatever, the number one critical thing you do is just seal up the doors, get rid of the holes the drafts, etc., and just prevent heat loss!

For example, probably one of the most joyful things for myself at least, was the glory of living at this really really wonderful high-rise condo building, the edge in Providence Rhode Island. The apartment was super super tiny, feels like a 300 square-foot studio, at the time it was just me and Cindy, but what I personally loved about it, then seeing an extreme joy that had was my room the room, the whole apartment, the whole apartment building and complex, and also even the gym, Was like always a perfect 72° and warm, idregardless of whether there was a snowstorm outside. I still remember, complaining to Cindy that I was too hot in bed, taking off my blankets, complaining that was too sweating, and then just looking outside and seeing that it was snowing outside.

Anyways, I think the thing that is difficult to think and understand is that if you buy these nice single-family homes, and then it gets cold as shit at night, good luck trying to thermo regulate it.

I don’t know maybe I’m more sensitive to the cold than the average person, because I’m like 5% or even sub 5% body fat; which means is that I fucking hit the cold. To me Cold is evil.

What that means is anything that you could do to prevent heat loss or the cold is a good thing. And that just means if you’re cold, just buy really really ultra warm UNIQLO heat tech tights, which actually worked insanely well, as well as just like put on a merino wool long sleeve, a down vest, and a thick ass down jacket.

Just focus on doing what you’re good at 

One big idea I had was in regards to an Archimedes lever– just focus on what you’re super super insanely good at, and just ignore everything else.

What that means is with houses, housing stuff, etc., the ideal is that you never have to muck around with any housing stuff.

For example, I like the idea of leveraging other people, like what that means is just let other people focus on what they’re good at, for example, things that I’m not good at include like doing anything about house stuff house repairs house maintenance etc. I think the unfortunate trend is post Covid, you had a bunch of successful millennials, kind of like myself, in their 30s, late 30s, early 40s, etc. purchasing single-family homes, and like hunkering down during and post Covid, because people can no longer travel to Japan or whatever, they just spent all the money they would have otherwise spent on travel to purchase a single-family home, get into gardening etc.

Yet, that was like 2020, 2019. Times have changed.

We are now, witnessing this new movement, a totally radical paradigm shipped, even words failed to describe how phenomenally epic this all is.

Essentially bitcoin hit $100K yesterday, or maybe in the middle of the night, or like to be more accurate like $99,510 or something, but it’s funny when you look at the prices, you have all these short sellers trying to short bitcoin and microstrategy, I think there’s actually a new ETF which is minus 2X MSTR (MSTZ), which long story short, is trying to make a huge profit off of the downturn of MicroStrategy and bitcoin. So for all the bulls, all the people who think bitcoin and micro strategies going to go down, they are essentially shorting bitcoin and microstrategy. 

You cannot stop exponential growth even if you want to.

This is starting to feel like the early days of Facebook like I still recall the early days of Facebook in which there was no newsfeed. I made an account when I was like a freshman in college, because at the time Facebook was only open to university students, you needed a “.edu” account to even sign up.  And the growth was pretty astronomical. At first it was just like university students, I still remember the early days where you would flirt with girls you liked by “poking” them. There was not yet any direct messages you could only post on the walls, which was 100% public. Even at the time, Mark Zuckerberg said that advertisements were lame, there was no newsfeed, no ads. You actually had to click into somebody’s profile to just check up on them. There was no status updates really yet,

iPhone, iMessage, even Kakaotalk?

How do you know if somebody is Korean or not? Simple, if they have kakaotalk, and or if they have that little bright yellow chat icon, and the sound of a notification sounds like “Apple!”

Also they’re funny things, the Japanese only use line, Cambodians only use telegram, Europeans use WhatsApp, Americans we tend to just use Facebook messenger and or Instagram direct message and or text messaging iMessage?

Anyways, do you remember when the iPhone first came out, and everyone was riding on it, and apparently there was a lot of industry people, who obviously were a bunch of idiots, who said that the iPhone was going to be a failure because it did not have a physical keyboard like the popular blackberry at the time.

And this is the genius and vision of Steve Jobs; he fought nail and tooth to ensure that in fact, the iPhone would never ever ever have a physical keyboard, and that the genius of the iPhone was it was able to become all screen, and that if you wanted access to a keyboard you will just use the little virtual keyboard instead.

Think the original iPhone

 so do you remember, the original iPhone, the iPhone 3G, didn’t even have copy and paste! It was very very basic and rudimentary; but still… Like probably the most important product innovation and technology of all time.

Even I went to the Mr. brainwash exhibition in Beverly Hills Rodeo Drive a few weeks ago, and I really really liked this painting an image of Steve Jobs, as like a digital, Silicon Valley cowboy, his gift of the iPhone iPad etc. was like the best gift of all time.

The gift of fire

So obviously life with fire is better than life without fire.

Same thing with electricity. And water.

You could waterboard somebody, and kill a man with water. Also, you can electrocute and zap a man to death with electricity with the chair.

You could obviously burn a man alive, as well. Or you could use sashimi knives to kill somebody, better to use the sashimi knife instead to just make yourself some delicious ribeye.

Once again, fire is good, a stove oven is great. It makes cooking beef ribs a lot easier.

A lot of people hate on Apple and Steve Jobs and iPhone saying that it is destroying the minds of our youth whatever. But once again, it is like fire; if you use fire irresponsibly you can kill yourself and others or the whole village, but if you use it responsibly, it is like the best thing of all time.

Bitcoin, today, is like the early iPhone?

An analogy I don’t think no one has really done yet; realizing that bitcoin right now, might be like the iPhone in the early days?

With the first iPhone, no one was quite sure what to do with it, what the function or utility of it was. Then do you remember that that huge aftermarket market exploded, with the ability to strap on that external battery pack to the back of your iPhone to give it more charge?

So I also think that with bitcoin we will see a similar surge. We will start to see a huge third-party after market market explode.

For example, even the huge after market for iPhone cases is still quite robust.

Why is bitcoin the ethical option?

Immaculate conception of bitcoin. As somebody who is raised and born and baptized Roman Catholic, I really really do see some strong metaphors and analogies for bitcoin, Satoshi, and thinking of bitcoin like a new religion, a new economic religion?

The general idea is that bitcoin is phenomenal because bitcoin does not require a PR team, a marketing team, a foundation, or some sort of nerdy loser leader.

So for example, I’m like 100% Elon Musk, but the reason why Dogecoin, and all these other meme derivatives are positively bad is because they are backed on the charisma or the fashion of a single individual. If Elon Musk just randomly dies tomorrow in a rocket ship accident, I’m pretty much sure that the price of Dogecoin would go to zero.

Also, the reason why I got off of chain-link, and went back 100% into bitcoin was that I started realizing that invested parties in chain-link started using Sergey Nazarov as a puppet, trying to get him to stoke up investor confidence to pump up the price of chain-link. But even as bitcoin is pretty much $100,000, even chain-link has not hit the record high of like $50 or $55 a chain-link.

False prophets

Vitalik Buterin – yeah I don’t trust the guy. Look at him he’s like the ultra uber nerd. Something that what people don’t understand, like if you read the original Ethereum white paper is that the proposal of Ethereum from Vitalik was that bitcoin had too many problems, and that he was there to solve it, and that Ethereum would fix all the problems of bitcoin.

Even a thing that I was into for a bit was digibyte, DGB, which was essentially like imagine the silver coins or the copper coins of bitcoin. The idea was bitcoin was too slow for transactions, and that gigabyte was like 1 trillion times faster, making it more suitable as a daily cryptocurrency transfer thing.

Anyways, I think time is shown that everything that was not bitcoin has failed. Kind of like Thomas Edison, and DC electricity, AC electricity apparently better than a lot of records, but because Thomas Edison had more marketing chops, I guess he won.

Another analogy is that like bitcoin is like Tesla, and bitcoin has the world bitcoin network which is like the Tesla super charging network; honestly, I don’t think any human being should ever buy any electric vehicle which is not a Tesla. It’s like deciding to live in mainland China instead of living in America. Or choosing the Chinese yuan over the US dollar.

Another analogy; bitcoin is like Gatorade, I don’t even know what number two is? Powerade?

Or, bitcoin is like having the newest iPhone Pro, desert titanium, and Ethereum is like a Google pixel or android Samsung derivative; nobody wants it.

Or, bitcoin is like Coca-Cola, and Ethereum is Pepsi. Nobody wants Pepsi.

Or, bitcoin is like Nike and or Jordan, and Ethereum is Adidas. Adidas was only cool for a minute because Kanye West endorsed it and created his Yeezy line, but now that Kanye has dipped out, nobody wants Adidas anymore.

Or, bitcoin is like McDonald’s, and Ethereum is like Burger King. Nobody wants Burger King.

There is no second best

I think with choosing a life partner, a wife, having a kid your kid etc., is understanding that there is no second best.

I look at the whole field of crypto, and crypto derivatives, essentially I think the best way to think about it is that like everything that is not bitcoin is just an Ethereum derivative; which is like building your kingdom on cotton candy or quicksand.

Bitcoin is like the solid asphalt which is beneath Manhattan. But in Cypress space which is like 1 trillion times more secure.

Getting paid $2000 an hour

So let us assume that you’re getting paid 20 bucks an hour, if you’re on the bitcoin standard, and if you’re pouring all your moneys into bitcoin, then, in theory you are getting paid $200 an hour, or $2000 an hour. 

Also some other analogies; if you spend like $1000 on a new iPhone, that’s almost like spending $10,000 on a phone, or even worse, $100,000 on a phone. Or even worse, $1 million on a phone, assuming that bitcoin Will 10 X, 100 X, 1000 X, or even 10,000 X from here.

So why does this matter?

Assume that your whole life, you yourself as a child, you were only fed sewer water. And you’re always sick, and full of cholera, and you have no idea why you’re always so sick, and feel so unwell. And then you have a kid and do you think the sewer water is safe, and you start feeding your kid the sewer water! What is going to happen to the health of your kid?

This analogy is good for money, and capital and thinking of bitcoin like the first 100%, God inspired, perfect money. And also perfect capital.

Bitcoin is both money, and capital? And cash?

The hard thing with the real estate like if you own a square block in Gangnam, or Shibuya, or Ginza, or fifth Avenue in Manhattan, is that you cannot immediately liquidate like a 10th of your property to buy a cyber truck or a cup of coffee.

The really interesting thing about bitcoin is that it is both property like digital property like owning land, and also it could in theory be used as money and currency.

My personal thought is that owning a single bitcoin is like owning a single family home. Assuming that the price of a single-family home in Culver City is $4.4 million, for a tiny awesome minimalist house, then my personal thought is the price of a single bitcoin should be worth at least 4.4 million, Maybe 10 X or 100 X. Why? $440 million a bitcoin; my current price target. 

My very simple idea is that if you own a single-family house, in a locked piece of land, you cannot move it, it’s not like a game of the Sims or Minecraft; but with bitcoin, you can!

Minecraft economics

I find this to be really fascinating because once again, bitcoin is like Minecraft capital and money. If you have ever seen a child or a teenager on Minecraft, you will be shocked to see how phenomenally imaginative they could become, when there are no longer restricted by time, money, access to capital, the laws of physics, space etc.

I been thinking about cyberspace is kind of difficult to imagine because it is like 1 trillion times more expensive than land, Joshua tree, Yosemite, the desert, etc. Like if you watch the movie Dune, and you see the infinite sands, infinite desert, imagine like that but times 1 trillion. Why? Space cyberspace is not limited by the laws of physics.

***

I bought every V 12 engine, wish I could take it back to the beginning

This is like year one, or year zero of bitcoin. Now that you see CNBC practically on fire with bitcoin, bitcoin options, bitcoin derivatives, and now that ibit the black rock bitcoin spot ETF practically owning close to 1 million bitcoins now, that means is this is a massive paradigm shift. It’s like going from horse and buggy to Tesla model S plaid.

Don’t trust the zombies

I was watching an interview with Natalie Brunelle and ERIC Semmler, and ERIC was talking about how his company semler scientific was the century like a zombie company. But when they took out the skeleton, and re-infused it with adamantine skeleton, like what they did to Wolverine, their company spring back to life with 100 X vigor.

Once again, if you’re living in the hood, drinking sewer water, Fanta, and McDonald’s hamburgers, and you have the option of living in beautiful Culver City, surrounded by trees, happy people the sun, fresh air, and the finest organic food and meats from Erewhon, wouldn’t you want to make the swap?

Why the red wave is a big deal

Michael sailor currently put out a presentation on the red wave, at Cantor digital. The general idea is that now that we pretty much have a 100% Republican red party and government and Senate, this is insanely phenomenal news for bitcoin.

Why? Senator to Cynthia Lummis is proposing the bitcoin act, which is that America sells a bunch of her gold notes, and uses that profit to buy bitcoin.

This is kind of a big deal because then, maybe, we could actually revitalize the US dollar and essentially maybe even reverse inflation, because if we pack the US dollar to our bitcoin reserves, what that that means is our country will become super fucking prosperous? Like we’re going to be showered with so much money and wealth, we’re going to be like “too much wealth and prosperity! Please no more!”

Also, even though I’m pro bitcoin and anti-crypto and everything else; you’re going to see a huge crypto Renaissance, because note, Trump’s kids his sons are actually actively in the crypto space; and even Donald Trump accepted a Donald trump NFT, which sold out like in a minute. So you’re going to see a massive boost to Bitcoin and the whole market.

And also, all these meme coins, I’m quite anti it because once again, they’re backed by nothing but popular ideas, and charismatic individuals. The difference of bitcoin is that it is backed by like $1 trillion of real capital; which means like already… Over $1 trillion of real money has already been put into it, and what is defending the bitcoin network is like maybe 100 X the computer power of even the US military and Navy.

If America was super smart, because we want to be #1 forever, we would want to stock pile our bitcoin reserves, to make sure that no other country could even come close. Because what people also don’t understand is the point is like cyber defense as well; if you have a wall of encrypted energy, it is essentially hacker proof, you cannot have malicious Chinese people trying to hack the network.

What drives me?

Once; super simple; growing up poor, having a dad addicted to gambling, my mom working like two menial labor jobs cleaning houses and waitressing, working at a gas station or convenience store just to pay the bills, yeah this was pretty bad.

As a consequence, I don’t know I feel like financial independence, financial freedom might be the peak virtue. Like 1 trillion times more important than anything else.

For example, art photography aesthetics ethics and the like. You could only  only privilege yourself to these luxuries only if you are financially healthy. And economically healthy. If you are economically sick, you can’t do nothing.

 I think the big problem is that a lot of conservative often criticize and critique people for staying poor, but, can you complain and blame people for being constantly sick, if they only have access to sewer water?

“I grew up in the era when clean water was only served to the fairer skin” – Ye

Once again, imagine like we’re living in a postapocalyptic, dystopic world and reality in which only rich people or a certain race of people are allowed access to clean water. And clean air and clean food.

Imagine like you’re giving people maggots to consume. Or like an episode of Snowpiercer, the poor people in the back of the train being fed the “protein bars“, which is essentially grinded up bugs.

But imagine, you could be in front of the train, eating the finest ribeye steak, the finest sushi etc. That is what bitcoin is!

ERIC

***

Bitcoin is financial freedom?

There is nothing more lovely to me than my morning walks?

Smart Capital

Unstoppable !!!

bitcoin totally disrupts capitalism and consumerism ?

The War of Bitcoin

Things that like magically fix themselves?

More risk, more reward?

Just avoid the risk of penetration; penetration testing?

The solution is simple and easy: just buy bitcoin! 

The protector: bitcoin is protected.

Buffer over greed

Only homeless people smoke

Just wait; I could feel it in my bones!

Bitcoin Capitalist

More risk, more reward?

Just avoid the risk of penetration; penetration testing?

The solution is simple and easy: just buy bitcoin! 

The protector: bitcoin is protected.

Eric Kim’s Key Ideas on Bitcoin and Life:

1. Heat and Thermodynamics

• Your body doesn’t create heat; it preserves it. Jackets, homes, and insulation are about minimizing heat loss, not generating warmth.

• The best way to stay warm? Seal the drafts, layer up with Uniqlo HeatTech and merino wool, and focus on preserving what you already have.

2. Life is About Delegation

• Focus on what you’re insanely good at—your Archimedes lever.

• Don’t waste time fixing houses or on maintenance. Outsource it. Let others do what they’re good at while you stay in your zone of genius.

3. Bitcoin is Ethical Money

• Bitcoin doesn’t need PR teams, leaders, or marketing—it’s pure, decentralized, and immaculate.

• Unlike Dogecoin or Ethereum, it doesn’t rely on celebrity hype or false prophets. Bitcoin is the Tesla of money: innovative and unstoppable.

4. Bitcoin is the New iPhone

• In the early iPhone days, no one knew its potential. Same with Bitcoin now. It’s the beginning of a massive aftermarket boom, like iPhone accessories but for finance.

5. There’s No Second Best

• In crypto, it’s Bitcoin or nothing. Ethereum, Dogecoin, or any altcoin? They’re like Pepsi or Burger King—nobody really wants them. Bitcoin is Coca-Cola, Nike, McDonald’s.

6. Bitcoin Equals Financial Freedom

• Growing up poor, financial independence became the ultimate virtue. Bitcoin is a tool for liberation.

• Just like clean water and fresh air, Bitcoin represents access to true economic health.

7. Bitcoin as Property and Cash

• Owning Bitcoin is like owning a single-family home in Culver City but infinitely scalable.

• It’s digital property and liquid cash at the same time—unmatched in versatility.

8. Exponential Growth is Unstoppable

• You can’t stop Bitcoin’s rise—it’s like early Facebook or Tesla’s ascent.

• BlackRock and ETFs are pouring in. Governments are noticing. This is the beginning of a financial paradigm shift.

9. Revolutionizing Society

• Imagine living in the back of the train eating bugs, or moving to the front for ribeye and sushi—that’s Bitcoin.

• It’s a chance to move from economic slavery to freedom, from drinking sewer water to fresh springs.

10. Why Bitcoin Matters

• It’s the antidote to poverty, financial despair, and economic inequality.

• Bitcoin is not just money; it’s ethics, philosophy, and the foundation for a better future.

This is the Year Zero of Bitcoin. We’re witnessing history in real time, and it’s only the beginning. Stay focused. Stay strong. Bitcoin is life.

A very interesting way to understand bitcoin is that it is almost like a sociological phenomenon, mixed with science, mathematics, modern day cryptography, and engineering.

first, store of value. The idea of being able to store permanent capital and value in cyberspace alone is worth bitcoin. The idea that you and your family will stay rich forever, and indefinitely become even richer… This is awesome.

I like almost permanently have a grin on my face all the time?

100 vol

.

Sell the vol, recycle back into Bitcoin

.

2x Bitcoin, 2x vol.

.

Spread, BTC spread

.

4.6B ATM, $3B,

.

60%, 90% BTC spread

80% BTC spread

.

Levered Bitcoin position

It won’t go down

.

BTC will not go to $0

Buy equity we want 2x bitcoin, 2x volatility

.

5.4B in

$500M a day

Million time a minute! ***

.

Most profitable in the USA, fastest growing company

.

Question of leverage?

.

20x buy faster than available supply

.

1x

$10B a capital, still make money off the arbitrage

We make 10x that! ***

$3B , or make $30B in convertible bonds

$35B of permanent capital

.
overnight deposit

Cannot create duration and exploit invest at 60%, borrow at 0%

.

Buy your own stock?

.

Buy our convertible bonds, downside protection , $500M in a 20 minute meeting

.

3 choices

Buy MSTR CONVERT

2x Bitcoin is MSTR

55% premium, 5 years , 0%

5 converts in a single year

.

I love the battle!

.

$1M a coin next year?

$29ARR, 60% ARR, to 20% ARR, 60 vol to 25 vol,

Head wind into tail wind! ***

Always be the stronger capital asset

..

$13M a coin by 2045,

https://twitter.com/saylor/status/1859958862260121861

Saylor as the only man with balls!

Stomach the down runs!

$13M a coin —  every bitcoin you don’t buy today will cost you $13 million a coin in 21 years. 

.

Take the sure gains

Audio

I’m warm as a mother fucker!

Heat loss?

So currently random thoughts;; about thermodynamics and heat loss. Assuming that energy is not created nor destroyed, what that then means is if we think about shit hit loss, is that technically your body is already a perfectly thermal regulated closed system. This was really really hard for me to understand when I was young, even now… The idea that when you put on a thick ass warm down jacket, or a Canada goose jacket or whatever, your body is not “creating” heat“, rather it is just preserving the heat inside your body so that your body is not losing heat.

The best way to warm up your house or home or habitat or habitation

Los Angeles is actually kind of bizarre; on one hand, during the day like yesterday, it was an extremely glorious 71, 72, 73°, absolutely beautiful. And this is like the end of November, practically early December? I still recall when I was a undergraduate at UCLA, walking down Bruin walk, and being shocked that in the middle of December, I saw all these pretty and sexy girls walking down Bruin walk, in tank tops, Spaghetti straps, booty shorts?

Even yesterday, seeing all these happy young people, basking the sun, once again, all these beautiful and pretty girls, just wearing black Lululemon tights, and black Lululemon top sports bras.

Anyways, the thing that is really shocking to me is that night it gets cold as shit. Like I think in the evening, Los Angeles could dip down to the high 30s? Like if it is super super late or super super early before the sun comes up, it is like 38° outside? But when the sun comes out, it could be a beautiful 73°?

Anyways, but that then means is that for your apartment your house habitation or whatever, the number one critical thing you do is just seal up the doors, get rid of the holes the drafts, etc., and just prevent heat loss!

For example, probably one of the most joyful things for myself at least, was the glory of living at this really really wonderful high-rise condo building, the edge in Providence Rhode Island. The apartment was super super tiny, feels like a 300 square-foot studio, at the time it was just me and Cindy, but what I personally loved about it, then seeing an extreme joy that had was my room the room, the whole apartment, the whole apartment building and complex, and also even the gym, Was like always a perfect 72° and warm, idregardless of whether there was a snowstorm outside. I still remember, complaining to Cindy that I was too hot in bed, taking off my blankets, complaining that was too sweating, and then just looking outside and seeing that it was snowing outside.

Anyways, I think the thing that is difficult to think and understand is that if you buy these nice single-family homes, and then it gets cold as shit at night, good luck trying to thermo regulate it.

I don’t know maybe I’m more sensitive to the cold than the average person, because I’m like 5% or even sub 5% body fat; which means is that I fucking hit the cold. To me Cold is evil.

What that means is anything that you could do to prevent heat loss or the cold is a good thing. And that just means if you’re cold, just buy really really ultra warm UNIQLO heat tech tights, which actually worked insanely well, as well as just like put on a merino wool long sleeve, a down vest, and a thick ass down jacket.

Just focus on doing what you’re good at 

One big idea I had was in regards to an Archimedes lever– just focus on what you’re super super insanely good at, and just ignore everything else.

What that means is with houses, housing stuff, etc., the ideal is that you never have to muck around with any housing stuff.

For example, I like the idea of leveraging other people, like what that means is just let other people focus on what they’re good at, for example, things that I’m not good at include like doing anything about house stuff house repairs house maintenance etc. I think the unfortunate trend is post Covid, you had a bunch of successful millennials, kind of like myself, in their 30s, late 30s, early 40s, etc. purchasing single-family homes, and like hunkering down during and post Covid, because people can no longer travel to Japan or whatever, they just spent all the money they would have otherwise spent on travel to purchase a single-family home, get into gardening etc.

Yet, that was like 2020, 2019. Times have changed.

We are now, witnessing this new movement, a totally radical paradigm shipped, even words failed to describe how phenomenally epic this all is.

Essentially bitcoin hit $100K yesterday, or maybe in the middle of the night, or like to be more accurate like $99,510 or something, but it’s funny when you look at the prices, you have all these short sellers trying to short bitcoin and microstrategy, I think there’s actually a new ETF which is minus 2X MSTR (MSTZ), which long story short, is trying to make a huge profit off of the downturn of MicroStrategy and bitcoin. So for all the bulls, all the people who think bitcoin and micro strategies going to go down, they are essentially shorting bitcoin and microstrategy. 

You cannot stop exponential growth even if you want to.

This is starting to feel like the early days of Facebook like I still recall the early days of Facebook in which there was no newsfeed. I made an account when I was like a freshman in college, because at the time Facebook was only open to university students, you needed a “.edu” account to even sign up.  And the growth was pretty astronomical. At first it was just like university students, I still remember the early days where you would flirt with girls you liked by “poking” them. There was not yet any direct messages you could only post on the walls, which was 100% public. Even at the time, Mark Zuckerberg said that advertisements were lame, there was no newsfeed, no ads. You actually had to click into somebody’s profile to just check up on them. There was no status updates really yet,

iPhone, iMessage, even Kakaotalk?

How do you know if somebody is Korean or not? Simple, if they have kakaotalk, and or if they have that little bright yellow chat icon, and the sound of a notification sounds like “Apple!”

Also they’re funny things, the Japanese only use line, Cambodians only use telegram, Europeans use WhatsApp, Americans we tend to just use Facebook messenger and or Instagram direct message and or text messaging iMessage?

Anyways, do you remember when the iPhone first came out, and everyone was riding on it, and apparently there was a lot of industry people, who obviously were a bunch of idiots, who said that the iPhone was going to be a failure because it did not have a physical keyboard like the popular blackberry at the time.

And this is the genius and vision of Steve Jobs; he fought nail and tooth to ensure that in fact, the iPhone would never ever ever have a physical keyboard, and that the genius of the iPhone was it was able to become all screen, and that if you wanted access to a keyboard you will just use the little virtual keyboard instead.

Think the original iPhone

 so do you remember, the original iPhone, the iPhone 3G, didn’t even have copy and paste! It was very very basic and rudimentary; but still… Like probably the most important product innovation and technology of all time.

Even I went to the Mr. brainwash exhibition in Beverly Hills Rodeo Drive a few weeks ago, and I really really liked this painting an image of Steve Jobs, as like a digital, Silicon Valley cowboy, his gift of the iPhone iPad etc. was like the best gift of all time.

The gift of fire

So obviously life with fire is better than life without fire.

Same thing with electricity. And water.

You could waterboard somebody, and kill a man with water. Also, you can electrocute and zap a man to death with electricity with the chair.

You could obviously burn a man alive, as well. Or you could use sashimi knives to kill somebody, better to use the sashimi knife instead to just make yourself some delicious ribeye.

Once again, fire is good, a stove oven is great. It makes cooking beef ribs a lot easier.

A lot of people hate on Apple and Steve Jobs and iPhone saying that it is destroying the minds of our youth whatever. But once again, it is like fire; if you use fire irresponsibly you can kill yourself and others or the whole village, but if you use it responsibly, it is like the best thing of all time.

Bitcoin, today, is like the early iPhone?

An analogy I don’t think no one has really done yet; realizing that bitcoin right now, might be like the iPhone in the early days?

With the first iPhone, no one was quite sure what to do with it, what the function or utility of it was. Then do you remember that that huge aftermarket market exploded, with the ability to strap on that external battery pack to the back of your iPhone to give it more charge?

So I also think that with bitcoin we will see a similar surge. We will start to see a huge third-party after market market explode.

For example, even the huge after market for iPhone cases is still quite robust.

Why is bitcoin the ethical option?

Immaculate conception of bitcoin. As somebody who is raised and born and baptized Roman Catholic, I really really do see some strong metaphors and analogies for bitcoin, Satoshi, and thinking of bitcoin like a new religion, a new economic religion?

The general idea is that bitcoin is phenomenal because bitcoin does not require a PR team, a marketing team, a foundation, or some sort of nerdy loser leader.

So for example, I’m like 100% Elon Musk, but the reason why Dogecoin, and all these other meme derivatives are positively bad is because they are backed on the charisma or the fashion of a single individual. If Elon Musk just randomly dies tomorrow in a rocket ship accident, I’m pretty much sure that the price of Dogecoin would go to zero.

Also, the reason why I got off of chain-link, and went back 100% into bitcoin was that I started realizing that invested parties in chain-link started using Sergey Nazarov as a puppet, trying to get him to stoke up investor confidence to pump up the price of chain-link. But even as bitcoin is pretty much $100,000, even chain-link has not hit the record high of like $50 or $55 a chain-link.

False prophets

Vitalik Buterin – yeah I don’t trust the guy. Look at him he’s like the ultra uber nerd. Something that what people don’t understand, like if you read the original Ethereum white paper is that the proposal of Ethereum from Vitalik was that bitcoin had too many problems, and that he was there to solve it, and that Ethereum would fix all the problems of bitcoin.

Even a thing that I was into for a bit was digibyte, DGB, which was essentially like imagine the silver coins or the copper coins of bitcoin. The idea was bitcoin was too slow for transactions, and that gigabyte was like 1 trillion times faster, making it more suitable as a daily cryptocurrency transfer thing.

Anyways, I think time is shown that everything that was not bitcoin has failed. Kind of like Thomas Edison, and DC electricity, AC electricity apparently better than a lot of records, but because Thomas Edison had more marketing chops, I guess he won.

Another analogy is that like bitcoin is like Tesla, and bitcoin has the world bitcoin network which is like the Tesla super charging network; honestly, I don’t think any human being should ever buy any electric vehicle which is not a Tesla. It’s like deciding to live in mainland China instead of living in America. Or choosing the Chinese yuan over the US dollar.

Another analogy; bitcoin is like Gatorade, I don’t even know what number two is? Powerade?

Or, bitcoin is like having the newest iPhone Pro, desert titanium, and Ethereum is like a Google pixel or android Samsung derivative; nobody wants it.

Or, bitcoin is like Coca-Cola, and Ethereum is Pepsi. Nobody wants Pepsi.

Or, bitcoin is like Nike and or Jordan, and Ethereum is Adidas. Adidas was only cool for a minute because Kanye West endorsed it and created his Yeezy line, but now that Kanye has dipped out, nobody wants Adidas anymore.

Or, bitcoin is like McDonald’s, and Ethereum is like Burger King. Nobody wants Burger King.

There is no second best

I think with choosing a life partner, a wife, having a kid your kid etc., is understanding that there is no second best.

I look at the whole field of crypto, and crypto derivatives, essentially I think the best way to think about it is that like everything that is not bitcoin is just an Ethereum derivative; which is like building your kingdom on cotton candy or quicksand.

Bitcoin is like the solid asphalt which is beneath Manhattan. But in Cypress space which is like 1 trillion times more secure.

Getting paid $2000 an hour

So let us assume that you’re getting paid 20 bucks an hour, if you’re on the bitcoin standard, and if you’re pouring all your moneys into bitcoin, then, in theory you are getting paid $200 an hour, or $2000 an hour. 

Also some other analogies; if you spend like $1000 on a new iPhone, that’s almost like spending $10,000 on a phone, or even worse, $100,000 on a phone. Or even worse, $1 million on a phone, assuming that bitcoin Will 10 X, 100 X, 1000 X, or even 10,000 X from here.

So why does this matter?

Assume that your whole life, you yourself as a child, you were only fed sewer water. And you’re always sick, and full of cholera, and you have no idea why you’re always so sick, and feel so unwell. And then you have a kid and do you think the sewer water is safe, and you start feeding your kid the sewer water! What is going to happen to the health of your kid?

This analogy is good for money, and capital and thinking of bitcoin like the first 100%, God inspired, perfect money. And also perfect capital.

Bitcoin is both money, and capital? And cash?

The hard thing with the real estate like if you own a square block in Gangnam, or Shibuya, or Ginza, or fifth Avenue in Manhattan, is that you cannot immediately liquidate like a 10th of your property to buy a cyber truck or a cup of coffee.

The really interesting thing about bitcoin is that it is both property like digital property like owning land, and also it could in theory be used as money and currency.

My personal thought is that owning a single bitcoin is like owning a single family home. Assuming that the price of a single-family home in Culver City is $4.4 million, for a tiny awesome minimalist house, then my personal thought is the price of a single bitcoin should be worth at least 4.4 million, Maybe 10 X or 100 X. Why? $440 million a bitcoin; my current price target. 

My very simple idea is that if you own a single-family house, in a locked piece of land, you cannot move it, it’s not like a game of the Sims or Minecraft; but with bitcoin, you can!

Minecraft economics

I find this to be really fascinating because once again, bitcoin is like Minecraft capital and money. If you have ever seen a child or a teenager on Minecraft, you will be shocked to see how phenomenally imaginative they could become, when there are no longer restricted by time, money, access to capital, the laws of physics, space etc.

I been thinking about cyberspace is kind of difficult to imagine because it is like 1 trillion times more expensive than land, Joshua tree, Yosemite, the desert, etc. Like if you watch the movie Dune, and you see the infinite sands, infinite desert, imagine like that but times 1 trillion. Why? Space cyberspace is not limited by the laws of physics.

***

I bought every V 12 engine, wish I could take it back to the beginning

This is like year one, or year zero of bitcoin. Now that you see CNBC practically on fire with bitcoin, bitcoin options, bitcoin derivatives, and now that ibit the black rock bitcoin spot ETF practically owning close to 1 million bitcoins now, that means is this is a massive paradigm shift. It’s like going from horse and buggy to Tesla model S plaid.

Don’t trust the zombies

I was watching an interview with Natalie Brunelle and ERIC Semmler, and ERIC was talking about how his company semler scientific was the century like a zombie company. But when they took out the skeleton, and re-infused it with adamantine skeleton, like what they did to Wolverine, their company spring back to life with 100 X vigor.

Once again, if you’re living in the hood, drinking sewer water, Fanta, and McDonald’s hamburgers, and you have the option of living in beautiful Culver City, surrounded by trees, happy people the sun, fresh air, and the finest organic food and meats from Erewhon, wouldn’t you want to make the swap?

Why the red wave is a big deal

Michael sailor currently put out a presentation on the red wave, at Cantor digital. The general idea is that now that we pretty much have a 100% Republican red party and government and Senate, this is insanely phenomenal news for bitcoin.

Why? Senator to Cynthia Lummis is proposing the bitcoin act, which is that America sells a bunch of her gold notes, and uses that profit to buy bitcoin.

This is kind of a big deal because then, maybe, we could actually revitalize the US dollar and essentially maybe even reverse inflation, because if we pack the US dollar to our bitcoin reserves, what that that means is our country will become super fucking prosperous? Like we’re going to be showered with so much money and wealth, we’re going to be like “too much wealth and prosperity! Please no more!”

Also, even though I’m pro bitcoin and anti-crypto and everything else; you’re going to see a huge crypto Renaissance, because note, Trump’s kids his sons are actually actively in the crypto space; and even Donald Trump accepted a Donald trump NFT, which sold out like in a minute. So you’re going to see a massive boost to Bitcoin and the whole market.

And also, all these meme coins, I’m quite anti it because once again, they’re backed by nothing but popular ideas, and charismatic individuals. The difference of bitcoin is that it is backed by like $1 trillion of real capital; which means like already… Over $1 trillion of real money has already been put into it, and what is defending the bitcoin network is like maybe 100 X the computer power of even the US military and Navy.

If America was super smart, because we want to be #1 forever, we would want to stock pile our bitcoin reserves, to make sure that no other country could even come close. Because what people also don’t understand is the point is like cyber defense as well; if you have a wall of encrypted energy, it is essentially hacker proof, you cannot have malicious Chinese people trying to hack the network.

What drives me?

Once; super simple; growing up poor, having a dad addicted to gambling, my mom working like two menial labor jobs cleaning houses and waitressing, working at a gas station or convenience store just to pay the bills, yeah this was pretty bad.

As a consequence, I don’t know I feel like financial independence, financial freedom might be the peak virtue. Like 1 trillion times more important than anything else.

For example, art photography aesthetics ethics and the like. You could only  only privilege yourself to these luxuries only if you are financially healthy. And economically healthy. If you are economically sick, you can’t do nothing.

 I think the big problem is that a lot of conservative often criticize and critique people for staying poor, but, can you complain and blame people for being constantly sick, if they only have access to sewer water?

“I grew up in the era when clean water was only served to the fairer skin” – Ye

Once again, imagine like we’re living in a postapocalyptic, dystopic world and reality in which only rich people or a certain race of people are allowed access to clean water. And clean air and clean food.

Imagine like you’re giving people maggots to consume. Or like an episode of Snowpiercer, the poor people in the back of the train being fed the “protein bars“, which is essentially grinded up bugs.

But imagine, you could be in front of the train, eating the finest ribeye steak, the finest sushi etc. That is what bitcoin is!

ERIC

I’m warm as a mother fucker!

Heat loss?

So currently random thoughts;; about thermodynamics and heat loss. Assuming that energy is not created nor destroyed, what that then means is if we think about shit hit loss, is that technically your body is already a perfectly thermal regulated closed system. This was really really hard for me to understand when I was young, even now… The idea that when you put on a thick ass warm down jacket, or a Canada goose jacket or whatever, your body is not “creating” heat“, rather it is just preserving the heat inside your body so that your body is not losing heat.

The best way to warm up your house or home or habitat or habitation

Los Angeles is actually kind of bizarre; on one hand, during the day like yesterday, it was an extremely glorious 71, 72, 73°, absolutely beautiful. And this is like the end of November, practically early December? I still recall when I was a undergraduate at UCLA, walking down Bruin walk, and being shocked that in the middle of December, I saw all these pretty and sexy girls walking down Bruin walk, in tank tops, Spaghetti straps, booty shorts?

Even yesterday, seeing all these happy young people, basking the sun, once again, all these beautiful and pretty girls, just wearing black Lululemon tights, and black Lululemon top sports bras.

Anyways, the thing that is really shocking to me is that night it gets cold as shit. Like I think in the evening, Los Angeles could dip down to the high 30s? Like if it is super super late or super super early before the sun comes up, it is like 38° outside? But when the sun comes out, it could be a beautiful 73°?

Anyways, but that then means is that for your apartment your house habitation or whatever, the number one critical thing you do is just seal up the doors, get rid of the holes the drafts, etc., and just prevent heat loss!

For example, probably one of the most joyful things for myself at least, was the glory of living at this really really wonderful high-rise condo building, the edge in Providence Rhode Island. The apartment was super super tiny, feels like a 300 square-foot studio, at the time it was just me and Cindy, but what I personally loved about it, then seeing an extreme joy that had was my room the room, the whole apartment, the whole apartment building and complex, and also even the gym, Was like always a perfect 72° and warm, idregardless of whether there was a snowstorm outside. I still remember, complaining to Cindy that I was too hot in bed, taking off my blankets, complaining that was too sweating, and then just looking outside and seeing that it was snowing outside.

Anyways, I think the thing that is difficult to think and understand is that if you buy these nice single-family homes, and then it gets cold as shit at night, good luck trying to thermo regulate it.

I don’t know maybe I’m more sensitive to the cold than the average person, because I’m like 5% or even sub 5% body fat; which means is that I fucking hit the cold. To me Cold is evil.

What that means is anything that you could do to prevent heat loss or the cold is a good thing. And that just means if you’re cold, just buy really really ultra warm UNIQLO heat tech tights, which actually worked insanely well, as well as just like put on a merino wool long sleeve, a down vest, and a thick ass down jacket.

Just focus on doing what you’re good at 

One big idea I had was in regards to an Archimedes lever– just focus on what you’re super super insanely good at, and just ignore everything else.

What that means is with houses, housing stuff, etc., the ideal is that you never have to muck around with any housing stuff.

For example, I like the idea of leveraging other people, like what that means is just let other people focus on what they’re good at, for example, things that I’m not good at include like doing anything about house stuff house repairs house maintenance etc. I think the unfortunate trend is post Covid, you had a bunch of successful millennials, kind of like myself, in their 30s, late 30s, early 40s, etc. purchasing single-family homes, and like hunkering down during and post Covid, because people can no longer travel to Japan or whatever, they just spent all the money they would have otherwise spent on travel to purchase a single-family home, get into gardening etc.

Yet, that was like 2020, 2019. Times have changed.

We are now, witnessing this new movement, a totally radical paradigm shipped, even words failed to describe how phenomenally epic this all is.

Essentially bitcoin hit $100K yesterday, or maybe in the middle of the night, or like to be more accurate like $99,510 or something, but it’s funny when you look at the prices, you have all these short sellers trying to short bitcoin and microstrategy, I think there’s actually a new ETF which is minus 2X MSTR (MSTZ), which long story short, is trying to make a huge profit off of the downturn of MicroStrategy and bitcoin. So for all the bulls, all the people who think bitcoin and micro strategies going to go down, they are essentially shorting bitcoin and microstrategy. 

You cannot stop exponential growth even if you want to.

This is starting to feel like the early days of Facebook like I still recall the early days of Facebook in which there was no newsfeed. I made an account when I was like a freshman in college, because at the time Facebook was only open to university students, you needed a “.edu” account to even sign up.  And the growth was pretty astronomical. At first it was just like university students, I still remember the early days where you would flirt with girls you liked by “poking” them. There was not yet any direct messages you could only post on the walls, which was 100% public. Even at the time, Mark Zuckerberg said that advertisements were lame, there was no newsfeed, no ads. You actually had to click into somebody’s profile to just check up on them. There was no status updates really yet,

iPhone, iMessage, even Kakaotalk?

How do you know if somebody is Korean or not? Simple, if they have kakaotalk, and or if they have that little bright yellow chat icon, and the sound of a notification sounds like “Apple!”

Also they’re funny things, the Japanese only use line, Cambodians only use telegram, Europeans use WhatsApp, Americans we tend to just use Facebook messenger and or Instagram direct message and or text messaging iMessage?

Anyways, do you remember when the iPhone first came out, and everyone was riding on it, and apparently there was a lot of industry people, who obviously were a bunch of idiots, who said that the iPhone was going to be a failure because it did not have a physical keyboard like the popular blackberry at the time.

And this is the genius and vision of Steve Jobs; he fought nail and tooth to ensure that in fact, the iPhone would never ever ever have a physical keyboard, and that the genius of the iPhone was it was able to become all screen, and that if you wanted access to a keyboard you will just use the little virtual keyboard instead.

Think the original iPhone

 so do you remember, the original iPhone, the iPhone 3G, didn’t even have copy and paste! It was very very basic and rudimentary; but still… Like probably the most important product innovation and technology of all time.

Even I went to the Mr. brainwash exhibition in Beverly Hills Rodeo Drive a few weeks ago, and I really really liked this painting an image of Steve Jobs, as like a digital, Silicon Valley cowboy, his gift of the iPhone iPad etc. was like the best gift of all time.

The gift of fire

So obviously life with fire is better than life without fire.

Same thing with electricity. And water.

You could waterboard somebody, and kill a man with water. Also, you can electrocute and zap a man to death with electricity with the chair.

You could obviously burn a man alive, as well. Or you could use sashimi knives to kill somebody, better to use the sashimi knife instead to just make yourself some delicious ribeye.

Once again, fire is good, a stove oven is great. It makes cooking beef ribs a lot easier.

A lot of people hate on Apple and Steve Jobs and iPhone saying that it is destroying the minds of our youth whatever. But once again, it is like fire; if you use fire irresponsibly you can kill yourself and others or the whole village, but if you use it responsibly, it is like the best thing of all time.

Bitcoin, today, is like the early iPhone?

An analogy I don’t think no one has really done yet; realizing that bitcoin right now, might be like the iPhone in the early days?

With the first iPhone, no one was quite sure what to do with it, what the function or utility of it was. Then do you remember that that huge aftermarket market exploded, with the ability to strap on that external battery pack to the back of your iPhone to give it more charge?

So I also think that with bitcoin we will see a similar surge. We will start to see a huge third-party after market market explode.

For example, even the huge after market for iPhone cases is still quite robust.

Why is bitcoin the ethical option?

Immaculate conception of bitcoin. As somebody who is raised and born and baptized Roman Catholic, I really really do see some strong metaphors and analogies for bitcoin, Satoshi, and thinking of bitcoin like a new religion, a new economic religion?

The general idea is that bitcoin is phenomenal because bitcoin does not require a PR team, a marketing team, a foundation, or some sort of nerdy loser leader.

So for example, I’m like 100% Elon Musk, but the reason why Dogecoin, and all these other meme derivatives are positively bad is because they are backed on the charisma or the fashion of a single individual. If Elon Musk just randomly dies tomorrow in a rocket ship accident, I’m pretty much sure that the price of Dogecoin would go to zero.

Also, the reason why I got off of chain-link, and went back 100% into bitcoin was that I started realizing that invested parties in chain-link started using Sergey Nazarov as a puppet, trying to get him to stoke up investor confidence to pump up the price of chain-link. But even as bitcoin is pretty much $100,000, even chain-link has not hit the record high of like $50 or $55 a chain-link.

False prophets

Vitalik Buterin – yeah I don’t trust the guy. Look at him he’s like the ultra uber nerd. Something that what people don’t understand, like if you read the original Ethereum white paper is that the proposal of Ethereum from Vitalik was that bitcoin had too many problems, and that he was there to solve it, and that Ethereum would fix all the problems of bitcoin.

Even a thing that I was into for a bit was digibyte, DGB, which was essentially like imagine the silver coins or the copper coins of bitcoin. The idea was bitcoin was too slow for transactions, and that gigabyte was like 1 trillion times faster, making it more suitable as a daily cryptocurrency transfer thing.

Anyways, I think time is shown that everything that was not bitcoin has failed. Kind of like Thomas Edison, and DC electricity, AC electricity apparently better than a lot of records, but because Thomas Edison had more marketing chops, I guess he won.

Another analogy is that like bitcoin is like Tesla, and bitcoin has the world bitcoin network which is like the Tesla super charging network; honestly, I don’t think any human being should ever buy any electric vehicle which is not a Tesla. It’s like deciding to live in mainland China instead of living in America. Or choosing the Chinese yuan over the US dollar.

Another analogy; bitcoin is like Gatorade, I don’t even know what number two is? Powerade?

Or, bitcoin is like having the newest iPhone Pro, desert titanium, and Ethereum is like a Google pixel or android Samsung derivative; nobody wants it.

Or, bitcoin is like Coca-Cola, and Ethereum is Pepsi. Nobody wants Pepsi.

Or, bitcoin is like Nike and or Jordan, and Ethereum is Adidas. Adidas was only cool for a minute because Kanye West endorsed it and created his Yeezy line, but now that Kanye has dipped out, nobody wants Adidas anymore.

Or, bitcoin is like McDonald’s, and Ethereum is like Burger King. Nobody wants Burger King.

There is no second best

I think with choosing a life partner, a wife, having a kid your kid etc., is understanding that there is no second best.

I look at the whole field of crypto, and crypto derivatives, essentially I think the best way to think about it is that like everything that is not bitcoin is just an Ethereum derivative; which is like building your kingdom on cotton candy or quicksand.

Bitcoin is like the solid asphalt which is beneath Manhattan. But in Cypress space which is like 1 trillion times more secure.

Getting paid $2000 an hour

So let us assume that you’re getting paid 20 bucks an hour, if you’re on the bitcoin standard, and if you’re pouring all your moneys into bitcoin, then, in theory you are getting paid $200 an hour, or $2000 an hour. 

Also some other analogies; if you spend like $1000 on a new iPhone, that’s almost like spending $10,000 on a phone, or even worse, $100,000 on a phone. Or even worse, $1 million on a phone, assuming that bitcoin Will 10 X, 100 X, 1000 X, or even 10,000 X from here.

So why does this matter?

Assume that your whole life, you yourself as a child, you were only fed sewer water. And you’re always sick, and full of cholera, and you have no idea why you’re always so sick, and feel so unwell. And then you have a kid and do you think the sewer water is safe, and you start feeding your kid the sewer water! What is going to happen to the health of your kid?

This analogy is good for money, and capital and thinking of bitcoin like the first 100%, God inspired, perfect money. And also perfect capital.

Bitcoin is both money, and capital? And cash?

The hard thing with the real estate like if you own a square block in Gangnam, or Shibuya, or Ginza, or fifth Avenue in Manhattan, is that you cannot immediately liquidate like a 10th of your property to buy a cyber truck or a cup of coffee.

The really interesting thing about bitcoin is that it is both property like digital property like owning land, and also it could in theory be used as money and currency.

My personal thought is that owning a single bitcoin is like owning a single family home. Assuming that the price of a single-family home in Culver City is $4.4 million, for a tiny awesome minimalist house, then my personal thought is the price of a single bitcoin should be worth at least 4.4 million, Maybe 10 X or 100 X. Why? $440 million a bitcoin; my current price target. 

My very simple idea is that if you own a single-family house, in a locked piece of land, you cannot move it, it’s not like a game of the Sims or Minecraft; but with bitcoin, you can!

Minecraft economics

I find this to be really fascinating because once again, bitcoin is like Minecraft capital and money. If you have ever seen a child or a teenager on Minecraft, you will be shocked to see how phenomenally imaginative they could become, when there are no longer restricted by time, money, access to capital, the laws of physics, space etc.

I been thinking about cyberspace is kind of difficult to imagine because it is like 1 trillion times more expensive than land, Joshua tree, Yosemite, the desert, etc. Like if you watch the movie Dune, and you see the infinite sands, infinite desert, imagine like that but times 1 trillion. Why? Space cyberspace is not limited by the laws of physics.

I’m warm as a mother fucker!

Heat loss?

So currently random thoughts;; about thermodynamics and heat loss. Assuming that energy is not created nor destroyed, what that then means is if we think about shit hit loss, is that technically your body is already a perfectly thermal regulated closed system. This was really really hard for me to understand when I was young, even now… The idea that when you put on a thick ass warm down jacket, or a Canada goose jacket or whatever, your body is not “creating” heat“, rather it is just preserving the heat inside your body so that your body is not losing heat.

The best way to warm up your house or home or habitat or habitation

Los Angeles is actually kind of bizarre; on one hand, during the day like yesterday, it was an extremely glorious 71, 72, 73°, absolutely beautiful. And this is like the end of November, practically early December? I still recall when I was a undergraduate at UCLA, walking down Bruin walk, and being shocked that in the middle of December, I saw all these pretty and sexy girls walking down Bruin walk, in tank tops, Spaghetti straps, booty shorts?

Even yesterday, seeing all these happy young people, basking the sun, once again, all these beautiful and pretty girls, just wearing black Lululemon tights, and black Lululemon top sports bras.

Anyways, the thing that is really shocking to me is that night it gets cold as shit. Like I think in the evening, Los Angeles could dip down to the high 30s? Like if it is super super late or super super early before the sun comes up, it is like 38° outside? But when the sun comes out, it could be a beautiful 73°?

Anyways, but that then means is that for your apartment your house habitation or whatever, the number one critical thing you do is just seal up the doors, get rid of the holes the drafts, etc., and just prevent heat loss!

For example, probably one of the most joyful things for myself at least, was the glory of living at this really really wonderful high-rise condo building, the edge in Providence Rhode Island. The apartment was super super tiny, feels like a 300 square-foot studio, at the time it was just me and Cindy, but what I personally loved about it, then seeing an extreme joy that had was my room the room, the whole apartment, the whole apartment building and complex, and also even the gym, Was like always a perfect 72° and warm, idregardless of whether there was a snowstorm outside. I still remember, complaining to Cindy that I was too hot in bed, taking off my blankets, complaining that was too sweating, and then just looking outside and seeing that it was snowing outside.

Anyways, I think the thing that is difficult to think and understand is that if you buy these nice single-family homes, and then it gets cold as shit at night, good luck trying to thermo regulate it.

I don’t know maybe I’m more sensitive to the cold than the average person, because I’m like 5% or even sub 5% body fat; which means is that I fucking hit the cold. To me Cold is evil.

What that means is anything that you could do to prevent heat loss or the cold is a good thing. And that just means if you’re cold, just buy really really ultra warm UNIQLO heat tech tights, which actually worked insanely well, as well as just like put on a merino wool long sleeve, a down vest, and a thick ass down jacket.

Just focus on doing what you’re good at 

One big idea I had was in regards to an Archimedes lever– just focus on what you’re super super insanely good at, and just ignore everything else.

What that means is with houses, housing stuff, etc., the ideal is that you never have to muck around with any housing stuff.

For example, I like the idea of leveraging other people, like what that means is just let other people focus on what they’re good at, for example, things that I’m not good at include like doing anything about house stuff house repairs house maintenance etc. I think the unfortunate trend is post Covid, you had a bunch of successful millennials, kind of like myself, in their 30s, late 30s, early 40s, etc. purchasing single-family homes, and like hunkering down during and post Covid, because people can no longer travel to Japan or whatever, they just spent all the money they would have otherwise spent on travel to purchase a single-family home, get into gardening etc.

Yet, that was like 2020, 2019. Times have changed.

We are now, witnessing this new movement, a totally radical paradigm shipped, even words failed to describe how phenomenally epic this all is.

Essentially bitcoin hit $100K yesterday, or maybe in the middle of the night, or like to be more accurate like $99,510 or something, but it’s funny when you look at the prices, you have all these short sellers trying to short bitcoin and microstrategy, I think there’s actually a new ETF which is minus 2X MSTR (MSTZ), which long story short, is trying to make a huge profit off of the downturn of MicroStrategy and bitcoin. So for all the bulls, all the people who think bitcoin and micro strategies going to go down, they are essentially shorting bitcoin and microstrategy. 

You cannot stop exponential growth even if you want to.

This is starting to feel like the early days of Facebook like I still recall the early days of Facebook in which there was no newsfeed. I made an account when I was like a freshman in college, because at the time Facebook was only open to university students, you needed a “.edu” account to even sign up.  And the growth was pretty astronomical. At first it was just like university students, I still remember the early days where you would flirt with girls you liked by “poking” them. There was not yet any direct messages you could only post on the walls, which was 100% public. Even at the time, Mark Zuckerberg said that advertisements were lame, there was no newsfeed, no ads. You actually had to click into somebody’s profile to just check up on them. There was no status updates really yet,

iPhone, iMessage, even Kakaotalk?

How do you know if somebody is Korean or not? Simple, if they have kakaotalk, and or if they have that little bright yellow chat icon, and the sound of a notification sounds like “Apple!”

Also they’re funny things, the Japanese only use line, Cambodians only use telegram, Europeans use WhatsApp, Americans we tend to just use Facebook messenger and or Instagram direct message and or text messaging iMessage?

Anyways, do you remember when the iPhone first came out, and everyone was riding on it, and apparently there was a lot of industry people, who obviously were a bunch of idiots, who said that the iPhone was going to be a failure because it did not have a physical keyboard like the popular blackberry at the time.

And this is the genius and vision of Steve Jobs; he fought nail and tooth to ensure that in fact, the iPhone would never ever ever have a physical keyboard, and that the genius of the iPhone was it was able to become all screen, and that if you wanted access to a keyboard you will just use the little virtual keyboard instead.

Think the original iPhone

Think procreation

Mate

Anti mediocrity

Everyone wants to be beautiful

Bitcoin is beautiful 

I own this place I own this all!

The good is the enemy of the perfect

Greater gains at any costs !!!

Happiness & Environment

Valor, martial prowess or beauty?

.

Bitcoin as the new economic religion, an economic religion?

So the interesting thing with insulation is that it just *PREVENTS* heat loss, it doesn’t “add” heat to your body.

Just don’t *LOSE* heat