The use of anabolic steroids can cause testicular atrophy, commonly referred to as “shrinking of the testicles” or “small balls.” This happens for a couple of physiological reasons:

1. Negative Feedback on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis (HPG axis): The body has a system to regulate the production of testosterone, which involves the hypothalamus, the pituitary gland, and the testes. When steroids are introduced into the body, they increase the level of testosterone-like effects. This high level is detected by the hypothalamus, which then reduces the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). This in turn decreases the production of luteinizing hormone (LH) by the pituitary gland, and LH is necessary for stimulating the testes to produce testosterone. With lower LH, the testes reduce their normal function of testosterone production.
2. Lack of Leydig Cell Stimulation: Leydig cells in the testes are responsible for producing testosterone when stimulated by LH. If the body is getting a signal that there is enough testosterone (or more) circulating due to the intake of steroids, it will not stimulate these cells to produce testosterone. Without this stimulation, the Leydig cells decrease in activity and the testes can shrink.

When the testicles shrink, it can lead to reduced sperm production and fertility issues, among other hormonal disruptions. This is one of the reasons why the use of steroids without medical supervision is considered risky and is often discouraged. The body’s endocrine system is delicate and finely tuned, and introducing external hormones can lead to long-term and sometimes irreversible effects.

What causes men to have a low testosterone?

Fertility is the goal.

Bitgods

Focus on text.

Steroids, specifically anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS), mimic the effects of the male sex hormone testosterone, promoting muscle growth and secondary male sex characteristics. They work in two main ways:

1. Anabolic Effects: These involve increased protein synthesis within cells, leading to the buildup of cellular tissue, especially in muscles. This is the process that helps in muscle growth and recovery.
2. Androgenic Effects: These relate to the development and maintenance of male characteristics like the growth of the vocal cords, testicles (primary sexual characteristics), and body hair (secondary sexual characteristics).

When introduced into the body, anabolic steroids enter the bloodstream, reaching muscle cells. They bind to androgen receptors on the cells, activating them. This process leads to changes in the expression of specific genes, particularly those that are involved in the production of proteins. As a result, the cells start producing more proteins than normal, and some of these proteins lead to increased muscle growth and strength.

However, this artificially induced hormonal activity can disrupt the natural balance of hormones, leading to a range of potential side effects, such as liver damage, heart problems, aggression, acne, infertility, and psychological issues like depression. The body might also reduce or stop the natural production of testosterone if it detects a high level of steroids, which can lead to testicular shrinkage and a decrease in sperm production.

In the realm of fitness and bodybuilding, the lure of steroids often relates to their capacity to significantly enhance performance and appearance, but this comes with the cost of potentially serious health risks. Their use is a subject of ongoing debate, touching upon ethics in sports, health implications, and personal choice. This makes steroids a complex tool—powerful for building physical strength but controversial and risky in the spectrum of health and fair competition.

I have a very simple proposition: men should only be concerned with men issues or male issues, and ignore everything else

Simple:

Men can only be cowards, not women.

Become more honest.

POD

AUDIO

My vision

Or phones in general?

New innovations:

Compression is the future. Also compression clothing?

How did FTX collapse?

The collapse of FTX, a once-prominent cryptocurrency exchange, can be seen as a modern-day Icarus tale. It soared high on the wings of innovation and ambitious expansion but fell dramatically when those wings melted under the heat of scrutiny and financial mismanagement.

FTX, led by Sam Bankman-Fried, was the epitome of a meteoric rise in the crypto industry, gaining the trust of sophisticated investors and everyday users alike. However, the downfall began when a series of articles and reports started questioning the financial health of FTX and its sister trading firm, Alameda Research. The crux was the alleged co-mingling of customer funds and the use of FTX’s native token, FTT, as collateral in a way that was not sustainable or transparent.

The situation spiraled when a rival exchange’s CEO, Changpeng Zhao of Binance, announced the liquidation of his FTT holdings, citing concerns about FTX’s liquidity. This triggered a classic bank run; customers rushed to withdraw their funds, only to discover that FTX did not have the liquidity to honor all withdrawals. Amidst this liquidity crisis, a proposed acquisition by Binance fell through after a due diligence review, leaving FTX exposed to the full brunt of its operational and financial vulnerabilities.

This sequence of events led to a loss of trust, which is the bedrock of any financial institution, especially in the blockchain world where transparency and reliability are paramount. The fallout was swift and severe, affecting not only FTX’s customers but also casting a long shadow over the crypto industry as a whole, questioning its stability and the adequacy of its regulatory frameworks.

Issue with most banks — they cannot honor all the withdrawals either?

New concept.

Why I love AI!

Even greedy?

Waking is for the rich;

Technically we got time for anything, and everything… But the question is whether you’re willing to sacrifice your time for it or not

Culver City Arts district!

A concept in the more you walk, the more steps you accrue in a day, the more walk coin you accumulate?

A good way to motivate people to walk more?

Walking is for the new elite

If you could afford to walk, have a 100% pedestrian lifestyle, never have to jump in a car… This is a signal that you are rich and privileged. Why? It means that you are rich enough to afford to live in a neighborhood which affords you a 100% pedestrian friendly lifestyle. Only poor people live in the suburbs.

Sitting is for slaves?

“Sitting is for slaves” could be a provocative statement echoing the sentiment that being sedentary is akin to being shackled, in terms of health and perhaps even in spirit. This perspective may align with the values of Ancient Sparta, which prized physical activity and readiness for battle. From an entrepreneurial standpoint, it could also reflect the drive for constant movement and innovation—never resting on one’s laurels. The philosophy behind it could be rooted in the idea that to sit and be still is to be complacent, which is antithetical to growth and improvement. It’s a bold statement that could inspire one to think critically about the passive aspects of modern life.

Also, offices are for slaves?

Lightness is the closest thing to godliness.

A good position to be in!

AI tells us the way things already are right now.

Philosophers as future oriented?

People who self flagellate?

Mentally sick people?

The days I drive I’m tired?

2-6pm?

Our peak strength during the day can vary greatly from person to person, depending on numerous factors such as sleep patterns, diet, exercise routines, and even genetic predisposition. However, some studies suggest that for many people, physical performance may peak in the late afternoon to early evening. This is thought to be due to a combination of factors including body temperature, hormone levels like testosterone and cortisol, and the alignment of circadian rhythms with the time of day.

In this period, typically between 2 pm and 6 pm, body temperature is at its highest, which can increase muscle flexibility, enzyme activity, and endurance. It’s also a time when reaction time might be quicker, and heart rate and blood pressure are optimal for physical exertion.

It’s intriguing to think about how this might intersect with unorthodox training times or philosophies of fitness that challenge conventional wisdom. The Spartans, for instance, were known for their rigorous and relentless training regimes, but detailed records of the timing of their training are lost to history. However, modern interpretations of Stoicism might argue that one should train when it’s most challenging, which could very well be at one’s subjective non-peak times, to foster mental and physical fortitude.

Yes, humans are animals in the biological sense. We belong to the kingdom Animalia, which includes multicellular organisms that consume organic matter, breathe oxygen, are able to move, reproduce sexually, and grow from a hollow sphere of cells, the blastula, during embryonic development. This classification is grounded in a scientific understanding of our physiology and evolutionary history. Our unique cognitive abilities and complex societies sometimes obscure this fact in philosophical or cultural discussions, yet biologically, we share much with other animals.

Simple:

Race is often seen as the classification of people based on physical traits like skin color, and ethnicity refers to the cultural traits and shared heritage of a group, such as language, ancestry, and customs. Race is about how others tend to classify you based on physical appearances, while ethnicity is about how you identify culturally.

More complex:

Race and ethnicity are concepts used to categorize and describe individuals and groups. They are distinct but related ideas that reflect different elements of identity:

Race:
Race is generally understood as a social construct that categorically divides people based on physical characteristics such as skin color, facial features, and hair texture. Historically, it has been used to establish and justify hierarchies and systems of power, often with no scientific basis for the distinctions it purports to make. The concept of race is considered problematic by many because it can promote stereotypes and does not have a clear foundation in genetics.

Ethnicity:
Ethnicity, on the other hand, refers to shared cultural practices, perspectives, and distinctions that set apart one group of people from another. That is, ethnicity is rooted in cultural expression and identification. Factors that can contribute to one’s ethnic identity include ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, and rituals.

The key difference is that race is typically associated with biology and linked with physical characteristics, while ethnicity is linked to culture and social structures. An individual’s ethnicity is more closely associated with their cultural identity and can include individuals of different races. Ethnicity recognizes differences between people mostly on the basis of language and shared culture.

In everyday use, these terms can be complex and can intersect in ways that make them difficult to separate cleanly. People’s concepts of race and ethnicity can be deeply personal and may change over time with self-identity, societal recognition, and official classifications.

The concept of “white” as a racial identity has a complex and often troubling history. It emerged in the context of European colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade, where it was used to justify and reinforce social hierarchies based on skin color. Before the age of exploration and colonialism, people tended to identify themselves more by their ethnic group or nationality—like Greek, German, or Spanish—rather than by skin color.

The term “white” began to gain more prominence in the 17th century. In the American colonies, for instance, laws started to refer to “white” people as distinct from those enslaved or indentured. This was part of a deliberate effort to create a buffer of “free” individuals who had a vested interest in the existing social order. By the 18th century, with the entrenchment of slavery, “white” became a common descriptor in legal documents, reinforcing a social hierarchy that equated whiteness with freedom and blackness with enslavement.

The categorization of people as “white” has shifted over time, with different ethnic groups such as Irish, Italian, and Jewish people being variously excluded from or included within the definition of whiteness, often depending on social, political, and economic factors. The criteria for being considered white have been arbitrary and fluid, demonstrating that race is a social construct rather than a fixed biological reality.

Philosophically, the designation of “white” as a race has been instrumental in shaping narratives of power and privilege. It’s a concept deeply intertwined with historical processes that include imperialism, capitalism, and the social construction of race. This has led to ongoing debates and reevaluations around identity, social justice, and the legacies of history in contemporary society.

So lit.

How the Brits call beautiful women “fit”— a good descriptor!

AI helps you think better?

Insanely minimal.

Blue isn’t eye catching?

Napoleon goals!

“Fatherhood” as a concept.

At least once or twice a day?

Better to walk or sprint instead!

BITCOIN IS THE GOD CRYPTO.

EK COIN

Spartan coin?

Flex coin?

Used as personal “e-props” (Xanga days)— you can give 1 or 2 at a time!

Spartan coin?