Imagine it’s the 18th century, and you’re Ferdinando Galiani, one of the sharpest economic minds of your time. You’ve just published “Della Moneta,” your masterpiece on the nature of money, value, and exchange. Now, fast forward a few centuries, and there’s something called Bitcoin. If Galiani were here today, I have no doubt he’d be fascinated by this digital currency—and might even be one of its biggest advocates. Let me explain why.

Money, at Its Core

Galiani was one of the first to argue that money is essentially a tool. It’s something society agrees upon as a medium of exchange, and its value is determined by our collective trust. Bitcoin follows this principle to the letter. It’s not tied to any government, central bank, or physical object. Its value is entirely based on consensus—the agreement of people across the world. If anything, Bitcoin strips money back to its most fundamental form, something Galiani would have deeply appreciated.

Scarcity and Value

Galiani’s big thing? Scarcity. He believed value was driven by the relationship between supply and demand. The more scarce something is, the more valuable it becomes. Bitcoin has this built into its DNA. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin—that’s it. No government can print more. No central authority can decide to change the rules. This built-in scarcity would resonate deeply with Galiani’s view on how value is determined. Bitcoin, by design, is like digital gold—scarce, valuable, and resistant to manipulation.

Currency Without Central Control

One of Galiani’s concerns in “Della Moneta” was how governments could debase currency—reducing the value of money by adding less valuable metals to coins or printing more money. This devalues the currency and erodes trust in the economy. Galiani would see Bitcoin as the antidote to this problem. Bitcoin’s decentralized nature means it can’t be debased. It’s not controlled by any one government or entity. The value is purely determined by the people who use it, free from the whims of central banks or politicians.

Bitcoin and the Global Market

Galiani understood the power of international trade and how interconnected economies benefit everyone involved. Bitcoin fits perfectly into this vision. It’s a global currency—not tied to any one nation, immune to borders, and available to anyone with an internet connection. This makes it easier for people across the world to trade, without worrying about exchange rates or banking systems. Galiani would see Bitcoin as a powerful tool for leveling the playing field in international commerce, allowing anyone, anywhere, to participate in the global market.

Trust in Code, Not Institutions

At its core, Bitcoin runs on trust. But here’s the twist—unlike traditional money, which depends on trust in institutions, Bitcoin relies on trust in code. It’s based on cryptography and blockchain technology, which ensures that every transaction is secure, transparent, and verified by a network of computers. For Galiani, who believed that money’s value stemmed from trust and agreement, Bitcoin’s reliance on mathematical principles rather than fallible human institutions would have been revolutionary.

The Shift in Power

Galiani would have also been intrigued by Bitcoin’s potential to shift power away from central authorities. He was deeply aware of how the manipulation of money by governments could lead to economic crises and social instability. With Bitcoin, power is placed back into the hands of individuals. You control your own money, stored in a digital wallet, without needing a bank or government. This democratization of money would likely appeal to Galiani’s views on limiting the control of centralized power over currency.

Bitcoin and Subjective Value

One of Galiani’s most profound ideas was that value is subjective. The worth of something isn’t fixed—it’s determined by how much people desire it. Bitcoin is a living example of this. Its value fluctuates, sometimes wildly, based on what people are willing to pay for it. It’s not tied to any intrinsic property or backed by physical assets. The market’s perception determines Bitcoin’s worth. For Galiani, who believed in the fluidity of value, Bitcoin would be an intriguing experiment in how human desire shapes monetary value.

A Radical Experiment

In the end, Galiani would see Bitcoin as a radical, real-time experiment in monetary theory. It challenges almost every aspect of traditional economics—how we create money, how we assign value, and how we use it in the marketplace. Bitcoin is a revolutionary rethinking of what money can be, much like Galiani’s work was for his time. He wasn’t afraid to question the status quo, and Bitcoin does just that on a global scale.

Why Galiani Would Love Bitcoin

So why would Galiani love Bitcoin? Because it embodies so many of the ideas he championed centuries ago. It’s a currency that strips away the unnecessary layers of central control, government manipulation, and arbitrary value systems. Instead, it’s built on trust, scarcity, and a decentralized, global network. Bitcoin is the ultimate expression of Galiani’s belief that money, at its core, is a human agreement. It’s not about what something is made of or who issues it—it’s about what people believe it’s worth.

Final Thoughts

If Ferdinando Galiani were alive today, I’m convinced he’d be fascinated by Bitcoin. He’d see in it the embodiment of his ideas on scarcity, value, and trust. Bitcoin represents a world where individuals, not governments, control the flow of money. It’s a world where value is subjective, trust is decentralized, and currency is free from manipulation. In short, Galiani would see Bitcoin as the future of money—a future he started imagining back in the 18th century.

…

Why Galiani Would Like Bitcoin

Have you ever wondered how an 18th-century economist would view the digital currencies of today? Let’s journey back to the insights of Ferdinando Galiani—a visionary who dissected the nature of money and value—and imagine his take on Bitcoin. Spoiler alert: I think he’d be fascinated.

Galiani’s Understanding of Money

First, let’s revisit what Galiani believed about money. In his seminal work, “Della Moneta”, he posited that money is not valuable because of the material it’s made from but because of the collective agreement on its value. Money, to Galiani, was a social construct—a tool that facilitates exchange and represents value agreed upon by society.

Bitcoin as the Evolution of Money

Enter Bitcoin: a decentralized digital currency that’s not backed by any physical commodity or government decree. It’s value agreed upon by a network, much like how Galiani described money in his time. Bitcoin operates on consensus, with its worth determined by supply and demand dynamics—principles that Galiani deeply understood.

Decentralization and Trust

Galiani was critical of how governments could manipulate currency through debasement, leading to inflation and loss of public trust. Bitcoin addresses this issue head-on with its decentralized nature and a fixed supply capped at 21 million coins. There’s no central authority to alter its value arbitrarily. Galiani would likely appreciate how Bitcoin returns monetary control to the people, aligning with his concerns about state interference in currency.

Subjective Value and Utility

One of Galiani’s key insights was that value is subjective, arising from utility and scarcity. Bitcoin embodies both. Its utility comes from enabling peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries, and its scarcity is mathematically enforced. This digital scarcity mirrors the precious metals of Galiani’s era but with the modern twist of cryptographic security.

The Role of Technology

While Galiani couldn’t have imagined the internet or blockchain technology, he was a forward-thinker who embraced the evolution of commerce and trade. Bitcoin represents a technological advancement in how we understand and use money. It transcends borders, reduces transaction costs, and operates 24/7—a global currency for a connected world. Galiani would see this as a natural progression in the facilitation of trade and exchange.

Challenges to Traditional Banking

Galiani criticized the inefficiencies and potential corruptions within traditional banking systems. Bitcoin challenges these systems by providing an alternative that’s transparent and tamper-proof, thanks to its underlying blockchain technology. Every transaction is recorded on a public ledger, reducing the potential for fraud—something Galiani would likely applaud.

Empowerment Through Financial Sovereignty

At its core, Bitcoin empowers individuals by giving them control over their own wealth without relying on intermediaries. This aligns with Galiani’s views on the importance of trust and the dangers of centralized control over money. He would appreciate how Bitcoin democratizes finance, making it accessible to anyone with an internet connection.

Final Thoughts

So, why would Galiani like Bitcoin? Because it embodies many of the principles he championed:

• Money as a social construct: Bitcoin’s value is determined by collective belief, not intrinsic material worth.

• Protection against debasement: Its fixed supply prevents arbitrary inflation.

• Subjective value through utility and scarcity: Bitcoin is both useful and scarce, enhancing its value.

• Decentralization and trust: It reduces reliance on central authorities, increasing public trust.

• Innovation in commerce: Bitcoin represents the evolution of money, facilitating global trade in ways Galiani would find revolutionary.

By bridging the gap between Galiani’s 18th-century insights and today’s digital innovations, we see that the core principles of economics remain timeless. Bitcoin is not just a new form of money; it’s a manifestation of ideas that thinkers like Galiani set in motion centuries ago.

Remember, the value we assign—whether to coins made of precious metals or to digital bits on a blockchain—is a reflection of our collective trust and shared beliefs. In that sense, Bitcoin is the next chapter in the ever-evolving story of money, one that Ferdinando Galiani would be intrigued to read.