Upon much thinking and consideration in terms of what bitcoin actually is; my personal thought is bitcoin is solidified energy.
For example, I find the economics on my name insanely fascinating. Basically you have a bunch of nerds with super computers, consuming lots of electrical energy and power in order to solve mathematically very difficult equations, to be rewarded with bitcoin per block.
As a consequence, this computing power, and electrical energy power is then converted and solidified into bitcoin.
***
Is Bitcoin bad for the planet?
No this is the annoying question that everyone asks, whether it is bad for the planet or not. People talk about all of the Chinese producing cheap energy through coal power plants, in order to mind these bitcoins. Yet nobody seems to have any problems talking about how the same mainland Chinese companies like Foxconn also burn through cheap sources of energy like Cole in order to make your iPhone Pro. 
Also, the lithium batteries in your Tesla are bad for the planet. Your Amazon prime subscription is bad for the planet. You streaming Netflix and Spotify all the time is bad for the planet.
Therefore I feel like this question of whether something is good for the planet or bad for the planet is the red herring. Which means, it isn’t really a significant question.
In fact, who knows maybe all this desire to mind more bitcoin or crypto will encourage more innovators and industrialist to perhaps invest in solar power. Truth be told there is no power more powerful than the sun. Even for myself is a human being, biological human being, I drive the most car in energy when I am in the direction. In fact my idea a paradise, or a perfect house or a home is a house or a home that gets sunlight, From sunrise to sunset. Kind of like a panopticon of the sun.
 This is where Elon Musk and Tesla is so genius; if you end up getting the Tesla solar roof, and getting a Tesla vehicle, in theory you can become your own energy producer your own utility, and to some extent, create your own grid.
What is the point of bitcoin anyways? 
This is where we have to delve into a more critical line of inquiry about the purpose of wealth and money in general.
For example, some things that money is good for include paying for airline airplane airline tickets, paying for rent, maybe paying your mortgage, buying a car, buying meat food and groceries at Costco, etc. 
Also money is good for paying for your Internet connection, preferably a gigabit fiber optic Internet connection, I just got thing.com connected at my apartment and I love it, and also using money to buy your digital camera, your iPad Pro or whatever.
So basically, the purpose of money is on one hand to acquire beneficial tools for you and your thriving.
As a creator, innovator, artist, certainly you need some tools. You need some sort of camera digital camera, some sort of computer laptop or iPad device, some sort of Internet connection or Wi-Fi network somewhere. And also you gotta eat; so certainly you got to spend some money on groceries food and meat, once again, Costco is a good bet because Costco doesn’t make a profit on their proceeds; they just make profits off of their membership. Therefore as consequence, you know that when you’re buying anything at Costco, you’re essentially paying rock bottom prices. 
How you could use your bitcoin to buy real life things
A very subtle and massively innovative thing is the Coinbase Visa debit card. Basically you could link it with your crypto account, and you could essentially pay for your trips to Costco or whatever using your bitcoin or your crypto balances. The reason why this is such a big deal is that the number one critique about bitcoin and crypto that people have is that you can’t Use it to buy real life things now you can.
Also, interesting innovations in the world of Jack Dorsey, Square, block.XYZ, the cash app, the bitcoin lightning network which makes it possible to send bitcoins and Satoshis in a fraction of a second. The reason why this is such a big deal is that now, you could use your bitcoin for real life transactions, pretty much instantaneously, if you want to.
So should I spend my bitcoins? 
Now this is the $10 trillion question; should you spend your bitcoins?
The first interesting thought is according to Michael Saylor, you should never spend a single bitcoin or a Satoshi. His idea is ideally you just keep borrowing Fiat money that, and hedge that against the historic rise of the price of bitcoin, and essentially forever maintaining your own lifestyle simply through debt.
To me, this is really fascinating, also not intuitive. For example if you could get a loan from the bank at 4%, 4.5%, 5% whatever, assuming that historically bitcoin value goes up 100% year over year, on average, Then if you think about the basic math, hundred percent versus 4%; you cannot lose.
I think the tricky thing here is patience, and thinking insanely long-term. Trying to think for at least 100 years into the future.
This is difficult because we humans are not programmed to think that far into the future. This is where it’s useful having children, because if you think about intergenerational wealth, creating your own family Empire, then what that means is you don’t just think about your kids, you think about your kids kids, or your kids kids kids.
This for my kids kids kids for when my kids kids kids have kids — Ye
Why build intergenerational wealth? 
I suppose this is where it is useful to think of like a philosopher, an emperor, a titan a tycoon etc. The basic idea is you don’t just think about yourself and your own life, you think about your future lineage.
No this is where things get interesting; why care about your own future lineage, if it is not you?
First, I think everyone should have at least one kid. Why? It transcends you.
It is impossible to convey the phenomenal amazingness of seeing your own blood child grow up, develop, gain greater intelligence, etc.
For example, Seneca at age 3 years, about two months old… His intelligence is getting out of control. And truth be told I think all kids are born geniuses, I really think that intelligence and knowledge in a kid is really 99.9% upbringing. It just depends on how much engagement and resources they get from their parents, their teachers etc.
 I was randomly reading a book by Plutarch on the art of child rearing. He brings up an interesting example from Lycurgus, one of the great Spartan kings in which he took two puppies from birth, separated them, had one raised hunting and strong, the other one living a pampered life of luxury. When the two dogs grew up, he then brought out a rabbit, a hare, and one of the dogs confidently demolished the rabbit, while the other pampered dog ran away in fear. Lycurgus then says —
“See! Both of these dogs were born from the same mother, yet how they were raised dramatically changed how they became.â€ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼ï¿¼
Think your future lineage
American Society is a bit strange; we are too individualistic, we are two into ourselves. I think the primary reason why a lot of people, young people or slightly older people no longer want to have kids is that it is a strange backwards myopic self interested idea:
I don’t want to have kids, because the kids will positively ruin my life.
This makes zero sense. In fact, having a kid is like having a mini clone of you. All of these silicon valley fools are trying to upload their consciousness to the cloud or live 1 trillion years or whatever; isn’t it just easier and more effective to have kids instead? 
Especially being a man, having at least one male son, one male air; I think any and each and every man, assuming that you have at least male son, you can die happy.
Once again, if you’re a man, and your first kid is a son; and fingers crossed your kid did not have any tragic mortality issues early on, consider yourself instantly blessed, life is all just upside from there, no downside. All the additional kids are just “BOGO†kids (buy one, get one free).
This is actually why I find it very impressive when people I know, or people I see, when they have multiple kids, and the oldest kid is a boy, it is truly a sign in a signal that they indeed do love kids, or wanted to have multiple kids. I always find it entertaining whenever I see families with two girls, three girls, four girls, or even five girls; it is a short tail sign that they were shooting for a boy, but eventually gave up.