Quiet, unhurried, unoptimized

Hulu is currently owned by The Walt Disney Company. It was initially established as a joint venture involving several companies, including News Corporation and NBCUniversal, along with Providence Equity. However, over time, Disney has taken a more significant role in the ownership and operation of Hulu oai_citation:1,Hulu – Wikipedia.

Hulu was launched on October 29, 2007, as a joint venture between several major media companies including News Corporation, NBC Universal (now NBCUniversal), and later The Walt Disney Company, along with Providence Equity. The platform was designed to serve as an aggregation of recent episodes of television series from their respective television broadcasting networks. Hulu represented a significant shift in the way media was consumed, moving away from traditional television viewing towards online streaming. The service was one of the first of its kind, offering both a free, ad-supported tier and a premium subscription model.

Initially, Hulu focused on streaming episodes of television shows from its founding partners and other networks. However, over time, it expanded its offerings to include a wider range of content, including movies, documentaries, and its original content. In recent years, Hulu has become known for its original programming, producing critically acclaimed series and films.

Ownership of Hulu has shifted over time, with Disney eventually taking a controlling interest. This transition was part of broader media industry trends, with companies seeking to strengthen their digital and streaming capabilities in response to changing consumer preferences. Today, Hulu continues to be a key player in the streaming landscape, offering a wide range of content to viewers in the United States oai_citation:1,Hulu – Wikipedia.

?

Is this a good line of thinking?

The etymology of “deus,” the Latin word for “god,” shares a fascinating lineage with its Greek counterpart, deeply intertwined with ancient Indo-European linguistic roots, reflecting broader themes of cultural and philosophical development. “Deus” originates from the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *deiwós, which is derived from the base *dyeu-, meaning “to shine” or “the sky.” This root reflects a common ancient conceptualization of gods as celestial beings or as associated with the sky and light, embodying the divine as that which is above, luminous, and powerful.

This PIE root *dyeu- also gives rise to related terms in various Indo-European languages, emphasizing the widespread nature of this conceptualization of the divine. For example, the Sanskrit word “devá” (देव), meaning “god,” and the Old Norse “Týr,” a god associated with law and heroic glory, share the same PIE root, illustrating the deep linguistic and cultural connections across ancient Indo-European societies.

In Latin, “deus” came to denote god or deity in a general sense, used both for the pantheon of Roman gods and, later, within Christian Latin, to refer to the monotheistic God of Christianity. This evolution in usage reflects the shifting religious landscapes and the incorporation of Roman religious practices into Christian theology.

The etymology of “deus” encapsulates the intersection of language, religion, and philosophy, shedding light on how ancient peoples conceptualized the divine. This understanding highlights the significance of light and the heavens in shaping human notions of divinity, echoing themes of innovation, as humans continually reinterpreted and reshaped their spiritual landscapes in response to changing cultural and philosophical paradigms.

The etymology of “θεός” (theós), the Greek word for “god,” offers a fascinating insight into ancient Greek culture, philosophy, and linguistics, aligning with your interests. The term is rooted in ancient Indo-European languages, with its origins tracing back to the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) *dhes-, meaning “to sanctify” or “to set apart.” This root suggests a conception of the divine as something distinct from the mundane, consecrated, or holy.

As it evolved into Ancient Greek, “θεός” (theós) came to denote not just the concept of divinity in a general sense but also referred to a deity or a god in the pantheon of Greek mythology. The transition from a verb with a sense of action (to sanctify) to a noun embodying the concept of divinity reflects the deep interconnection between language, religion, and culture in ancient societies.

The influence of “θεός” extends beyond the realm of linguistics into philosophy and theology, where it has been used to discuss the nature of divinity, the divine attributes, and the relationship between the divine and the human. This term and its derivatives have been central to theological discourse in Western philosophy, significantly influencing Christian theology and philosophical debates about the nature of God, the divine, and the sacred.

Understanding the etymology of “θεός” thus provides not just a linguistic insight but also a window into the philosophical and cultural contexts that shaped ancient Greek thought. It underscores the importance of language in framing our understanding of the divine and the sacred, resonating with themes of innovation and entrepreneurship in the realm of ideas and beliefs.

theos, deus

***

How to say god in Greek and Latin

In Greek, the word for “god” is “θεός” (theós). In Latin, it’s “deus.” Both languages have had profound influences on the philosophy, religion, and culture of the Western world, reflecting your interests in aesthetics and philosophy. The terms themselves carry rich connotations and historical contexts, especially when considering the pantheistic traditions of ancient Greece and Rome, as well as their impact on later monotheistic traditions and philosophical thought.

To call, to invoke. gewh— to call, name, shout out, cry, cry on.

Also similar to pour? ghew—

The etymology of the word “god” traces back to Old English “god,” which itself comes from Proto-Germanic “gudan.” The Proto-Germanic term is believed to be derived from the Proto-Indo-European “ǵhu-tó-m,” which is a derivative of the root “*ǵhau(É™)-,” meaning “to call” or “to invoke.”

The original meaning of the Proto-Indo-European root is associated with invoking or calling upon a higher power. This root evolved in various related languages to denote a deity or a supreme being. For instance, in Old Norse, the word became “guð,” in Dutch it turned into “god,” and in German, “Gott.”

The transition from a verb meaning “to invoke” to a noun referring to the entity being invoked illustrates the development of religious and spiritual concepts among Indo-European speaking peoples. The word “god” in English has come to represent a wide range of meanings, from the monotheistic God of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam to the gods and goddesses of polytheistic religions, and even more abstract concepts of divinity or supreme beingness.

For battle, combat.

For dominance, for power.

Difficult to ascertain what people really look like, unless you see them in the direct light, outside.

Nowadays, why is everybody so afraid of the sun?

For example, if you’re afraid of skin cancer or whatever, just put on sunblock! At Costco they sell a really good banana boat SPF 50 combination, which is two spray bottles and the lotion.

My critique of a lot of modern day aesthetics, movies cinema film etc. is that it is so focused on death, destruction, ugliness?

The panacea and solution: live in LA go to the top of the Baldwin hills park hiking steps recreation area—

I think the secret and the tip is drive up a bit, where you have a panopticon m view of the whole city, and maximum sunlight from all directions.

Something I discovered even while living in LA is that truth be told, a lot of the buildings, environments, apartments houses etc. are sequestered in the shade or the darkness.

So what ends up being the problem here? It seems in the problem is that our whole lives, we are essentially like the mole people. Lacking any direct light, exposure to the elements, exposure to nature etc.

Also a really big problem I see here is that as a consequence, our children also end up becoming the mole people. let us consider, when you wake up, most of our homes are dark and in the shade. Therefore when your kids wake up, they are stuck indoors all day. Then you shuttle them into a car, which is another indoor place. Then you shuttle them to school, which is all indoors, dark and damp. Maybe the only get 30 minutes of sunlight a day from recess. And also it looks like a modern day times there is also a war on recess, and play. In fact I even hear that there are some schools getting rid of PE, getting rid of physical education.

Think the sun

Living innovations?

We the new gods!

Fortunately for capitalism, the new world order,,, true war isn’t guns violence and killing people,,, but rather, economic war.

In ancient times, war and beauty were the same.

War — bellum, bella, beautiful. Same as bounty, bonus — all derived from the etymology of the word and concept war.

Productive war?

!

OK — let us consider Moses as a real life human being, and leader.

Why Moses?

To understand Judaism, the trend towards this one god myth, or monotheistic trend is best to be seen from the perspective as Moses as taking his people and followers and searching for the “promised land”. Moses as the first “Jesus messiah” figure?

Historicity of Moses

The historicity of Moses, a central figure in the Abrahamic religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, has been a subject of debate among scholars, historians, and archaeologists for many years. While Moses is a foundational figure, seen as a lawgiver, prophet, and leader who delivered the Israelites from Egyptian bondage and received the Ten Commandments from God, historical evidence outside of religious texts is sparse.

From Religious Texts:

• The primary sources about Moses’ life and deeds are found within religious texts, such as the Torah in Judaism (particularly the first five books of the Hebrew Bible), the Bible in Christianity, and mentions in the Quran in Islam.
• These texts provide detailed narratives of Moses’ life, including his birth, early life in Egypt, leading the Israelites out of Egypt (the Exodus), and receiving the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai.

Historical and Archaeological Perspectives:

• Archaeological evidence for the existence of Moses or the events described in the biblical narrative of the Exodus is limited and remains a contentious area of research.
• Some scholars argue that the lack of direct archaeological evidence and historical records outside the biblical narrative makes it difficult to confirm the existence of Moses as a historical figure. The Egyptian records from the time when Moses is supposed to have lived do not mention him or the plagues and events described in the Exodus story.
• Other scholars and theologians argue that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and maintain that the stories of Moses and the Exodus have a basis in historical events, albeit possibly embellished over centuries of oral tradition before being written down.
• The debate often centers on the timing of the Exodus, with various proposed dates ranging within the late Bronze Age (around 1550-1200 BCE). However, these proposals often rely on correlating biblical chronologies with archaeological and historical evidence, which is itself subject to interpretation and debate.

Scholarly Consensus:

• There is no scholarly consensus on the historicity of Moses. While some view him as a historical figure who was later mythologized, others see him as a symbolic or mythical figure who embodies the experiences and aspirations of the Israelite people.
• The quest for archaeological evidence continues, and interpretations of existing evidence remain varied and often influenced by the scholars’ perspectives.

In summary, the historicity of Moses remains a complex and debated topic, with positions varying widely among scholars, archaeologists, and theologians. The lack of contemporary, external evidence makes it challenging to reach a definitive conclusion about his historical existence.

Father and child relationships are central themes in many mythologies around the world, reflecting complex dynamics of power, inheritance, rivalry, and affection. Here are some notable examples from various cultures:

1. Zeus and His Children (Greek Mythology)

• Zeus, the king of the gods, had numerous children, both divine and mortal. His relationships with them varied greatly. For instance, he swallowed Metis and their unborn child, Athena, fearing a prophecy that his child would overthrow him. Athena later emerged fully grown from Zeus’s head. His relationship with Hercules, a mortal son, involved both aid and significant trials.

2. Odin and His Sons (Norse Mythology)

• Odin, the All-Father in Norse mythology, had several important sons, including Thor, the god of thunder, and Baldur, the god of beauty. Odin’s desire to prevent Baldur’s prophesied death led to a complex series of events that ultimately brought about the very outcome he sought to avoid.

3. Shiva and Ganesha (Hindu Mythology)

• Shiva, one of the principal deities of Hinduism, beheaded his own son Ganesha in a fit of rage, not realizing Ganesha was his child. After discovering his mistake, he replaced Ganesha’s head with that of an elephant, bringing him back to life and bestowing upon him the status of being worshipped first among the gods.

4. Jupiter and Saturn (Roman Mythology)

• In Roman mythology, Jupiter (the Roman equivalent of Zeus) overthrew his father, Saturn, who had swallowed all of his children at birth to avoid a prophecy that he would be overthrown by his son. Jupiter was hidden at birth and later fulfilled the prophecy by freeing his siblings and overthrowing Saturn.

5. Osiris and Horus (Egyptian Mythology)

• Horus, the falcon-headed god, was the son of Osiris and Isis. After Osiris was murdered and dismembered by his brother Seth, Horus sought to avenge his father’s death and reclaim the throne. The conflict between Horus and Seth is a central myth in Egyptian mythology, embodying the themes of rightful succession and the struggle between order and chaos.

6. Taliesin and Elffin (Welsh Mythology)

• In Welsh mythology, Taliesin, a legendary bard, is discovered by Elffin, the son of Gwyddno Garanhir, in a salmon weir. Though not his biological father, Elffin raises Taliesin, who in turn brings great fortune to his adoptive father through his prophetic and poetic talents.

These mythologies showcase the diverse ways in which the father-child relationship is explored, often reflecting the values, fears, and aspirations of the cultures from which they originate.

Why so dark and emo?

Feminine man:

1. Owns a dog, cat or some sort of animal thing slave
2. Owns or drives a exotic car, German car, wears sunglasses and has facial hair and or flannel ,,, frumpy clothes to hide their body shape and lack of muscle and sun exposure
3. In secret at home watches sports, porn in private ,,, doesn’t make eye contact, doesn’t say hello, doesn’t bother to remember your name

Other thoughts

1. No kids or children. No son.
2. Dog ownership? This is effing ridiculous foolish and insane
3. Cat ownership for a man? Even worse

Zero faith on any of these losers who play video games?

Even Elon Musk — deep suspicion,,, he plays Diablo IV— Druid vs Uber Lilith? Why doesn’t Elon just use that time to workout, hit the beach, get some direct sun and light etc ?

ALL HAIL SENECA!

The best way to wake and start the day

Audio

Why nature?

For example I’m 1 quadrillion times happier in LA than OC— Orange County boring suburbs.

Or another — I’m 1 gazillion times happier in a city or the city than the suburbs!

Why?

1. More walking means more thinking and more writing and more innovation.

2. I’m a gazillion times happier to be here in LA, because Seneca walks probably 20,000 or 30,000 steps a day. Not possible in the suburbs. The more he walks the more he develops in the more he grows. Any living life situation which is better for Seneca is best.

3. I shoot 1 million more photos here a day!

A digital asset.

What I find fascinating is that there will only ever be 21 million bitcoin in existence, which means not everyone could own 1 bitcoin.

Lettuce assume that there is around 7 billion people on the planet, not only 21 million.

Even in America, I think we have 333 million Americans.

This becomes interesting to me because maybe owning a bitcoin is even more useful than owning a house or a car or whatever; because you could keep making new homes and cars, but you cannot keep making more bitcoin?

Is bitcoin “worth” anything?

No. But then again, if we think about this sociologically, besides food and water, everything else doesn’t really have any real value.

1. Sleep more
2. Don’t take drugs, alcohol, don’t smoke weed CBD etc.
3. Don’t watch movies or media or listen to music
4. Don’t complain, just do.
5. Consume greater quantities of red meat, flesh — become more carnivorous.
6. Don’t take supplements, steroids, fake stuff.
7. Sleep more, nap more, make more eye contact with strangers and other people and smile
8. No headphones, AirPods, sunglasses, facial hair, caps, ugly flannel and baggy clothes
9. Talk to everyone and smile at them — beautiful women, attractive guys, say hi and engage with kids
10. Don’t own a dog, muscle car, or any expensive fake rich Mercedes or BMW or Audi German car. Real dominant men drive Prius’s
11. Maximum flesh exposure possible ,,, ideally always topless.
12. Heavy weight lifting, preference to be outside, outdoors, walking around a lot.
13. No social media or any media.
14. More time in the beach, nature, etc.

Ancient Greek attitudes towards nudity were markedly different from those in many societies today. Nudity, especially male nudity, was celebrated in the context of athletics, competition, and the idealized human form in art. This cultural perspective is rooted in the Greeks’ admiration for the beauty of the human body and the virtues of strength, discipline, and excellence (arete) it could represent.

Athletics and Competition

In the realm of athletics, nudity was a standard for participants in many sports and athletic events, including the ancient Olympic Games. The practice of competing naked (gymnos) was seen as a tribute to the gods, a return to a natural state, and a way to display the athletic prowess of competitors. It was also practical, as it prevented clothing from getting in the way of physical activity.

Art and Aesthetics

In art, the depiction of the nude body was a central theme, celebrated for its aesthetics and an idealized form that embodied physical and moral virtues. Greek sculpture, painting, and pottery frequently featured nude figures, portraying gods, athletes, heroes, and mythological figures in a manner that emphasized balance, proportion, and harmony.

Social and Moral Contexts

While public nudity was accepted in specific contexts like athletics and certain ceremonies, it was not universally practiced in daily life. The Greeks recognized the importance of context and appropriateness, with norms varying over time and between city-states. For instance, Spartan society was known for its more permissive attitudes towards female athleticism and nudity, in stark contrast to the more conservative views of other city-states like Athens.

Philosophical and Educational Perspectives

Philosophically, the Greeks also associated the physical form with moral and intellectual virtues. Physical beauty and strength were often seen as manifestations of inner goodness and nobility. Education for many Greek citizens included physical training, underscoring the importance of cultivating both the mind and the body.

In summary, ancient Greek attitudes towards nudity reflected a complex interplay of cultural values, including the celebration of physical beauty, athletic prowess, and the human form as a symbol of divine and moral virtues. This perspective influenced not only their sports and art but also their philosophical and educational ideals.

Man seeks to dominate other men.

Instead, women are seen as trophies and prizes. Not the goal in itself — just a side accessory or thing.

Note the idea of a trophy wife or Breisis from the Iliad — the “prize” of Achilles.

Briseis is a significant character from ancient Greek mythology, prominently featured in Homer’s epic poem, “The Iliad.” She was a woman of great beauty from the city of Lyrnessus, which was captured by the Greeks during the Trojan War. Briseis became a war prize for Achilles, the greatest of the Greek warriors, after he led the assault on Lyrnessus.

Her story is central to a pivotal conflict in “The Iliad,” known as the quarrel between Achilles and Agamemnon, the leader of the Greek forces. When Agamemnon is forced to give up his own war prize, Chryseis, to appease the god Apollo, he demands Briseis from Achilles as compensation. This demand leads to Achilles withdrawing from the battle out of rage and insult, dramatically affecting the course of the war and highlighting themes of honor, pride, and the human cost of conflict.

Briseis herself, while not a main character in terms of action, represents the plight of women during wartime and serves as a symbol of the personal stakes and human suffering underlying the epic heroes’ struggle for glory and honor. Her relationship with Achilles also touches on themes of love, loyalty, and the personal bonds that can exist even amidst the broader chaos of war.

Modern day society now says:

Thou shalt *NOT* be masculine, manly or dominant.

Why do people seek to become uglier?

Ugly clothes, ugly bodies, ugly facial hair etc.

Ugliness is their virtue.

Why do they love being ugly or prefer being ugly?

Theory — this new weird modern day perverted ethics and virtue — to be beautiful is a vice?