Accessible vs inaccessible?

For example, one of the great benefits of going to a park very very high up, in which you gotta drive, is that for the most part it is inaccessible to homeless people. As a consequence, the bathrooms are 1 billion times cleaner, better maintained etc. I can actually go number two in the public parks high up, and there is actually toilet paper! And it is actually clean! Kenneth Hanh park in LA is phenomenal! And for personal reference, there is a really good calisthenics public outdoor workout park gym here. Google Map pin here. Also for your kid, this park here is lit!

Perhaps the problem about places like San Francisco is that it is too accessible, everything is pedestrian, and walkable, and as a consequence, homeless people prefer to stay there.

How do we resolve the issue of homelessness?

A little birdie told me that some places like Irvine, the cops will actually offer $100 bucks for a homeless person to leave, and just go to the next city. It sounds pretty ruthless, but perhaps the best way to get rid of homeless people in desirable areas is to just bribe them with money.

One really weird thing that I’ve observed is that why is it that so many people have this weird sort of pseudo compassion for homeless people? To me that line of thinking is very bizarre.

Why this matters

Once you get a kid, a big critical thing; you just want the bathroom, the public bathroom at a park etc. to be clean hygienic and usable. What millennials don’t get, millennials who don’t have kids that once you got a kid, it is beyond yourself.