{"id":201906,"date":"2020-01-12T09:35:29","date_gmt":"2020-01-12T17:35:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/erickimphotography.com\/blog\/?p=201906"},"modified":"2020-01-12T10:22:07","modified_gmt":"2020-01-12T18:22:07","slug":"the-more-obscure-and-unclear-the-better","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/erickimphotography.com\/blog\/2020\/01\/12\/the-more-obscure-and-unclear-the-better\/","title":{"rendered":"The More Obscure and Unclear, the Better."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A new and change\/evolution in my visual aesthetics:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I prefer photos that are more obscure than photos which are too clear. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Too sharp ain’t good<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Mystery is good. To use a crude example, let us ask:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is more appealing, a completely naked woman or one who has some things peeking through?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Also another crude example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It seems people don’t like hyper-sharp blu-ray pornography. Why? Too sharp shows too many flaws; which is aesthetically ugly and repulsive.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This is why I hate watching most modern films: too many frames per second, too much sharpness is ugly. Cinema<\/a> with “imperfect” film shot at a slower 24 frames-per-second seems more beautiful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Embrace blur, out-of-focus, black and white, and grittier aesthetics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Havana,
Havana, 2020 #streettogs<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

You don’t gotta shoot film; you can shoot digital! Just “dirty up” your digital photos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n