Get out of the house!

Become the hero!

”Not good enough!”

Don’t wait for others!

Because life is more fun that way!

Bonus … also comes from “bellum” (war).

Modern-day society doesn’t care for beauty anymore?

What does society care for? Capital, money … money making ability.

Your body is only virtuous insofar much as you can make money from it!

The etymology and history of the concept of “beauty” are fascinating, reflecting the evolution of culture, philosophy, and human perception.

Etymology

The word “beauty” originates from the Old French “beauté,” which dates back to the 12th century. It is derived from the Latin “bellus” or “bella,” meaning “pretty,” “pleasant,” and “attractive.” This root is also connected to Latin “bellum,” meaning “war,” which interestingly juxtaposes the concepts of conflict and appeal.

Historical Perspectives

1. Ancient Civilizations: In ancient Greece, beauty was closely tied to the notion of “kalokagathia,” a compound of “kalos” (beautiful) and “agathos” (good or virtuous). This concept reflected a harmony between physical appearance and moral goodness. The Greeks idolized symmetry and proportion, famously embodied in their sculpture and architecture.
2. Medieval Era: During this period, beauty began to be seen more in spiritual terms. The emphasis was less on physical appearance and more on inner virtue and piety. Beauty was often associated with the divine and the idea of the soul’s purity.
3. Renaissance: This era marked a return to classical ideals. Beauty was about balance, proportion, and harmony, influenced by the rediscovery of ancient Greek and Roman art and philosophy. The human body was celebrated, and there was a renewed focus on humanism and the individual.
4. 18th and 19th Centuries: The concept of beauty became more subjective and varied. The Age of Enlightenment introduced the idea that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. Romanticism, on the other hand, emphasized emotion and individualism, with beauty often linked to nature, emotion, and the sublime.
5. Modern Era: Beauty standards became increasingly diverse and fragmented, influenced by cultural changes, technological advancements, and globalization. The 20th century saw beauty being heavily commercialized and idealized through cinema and advertising.
6. Contemporary Views: Today, beauty is often discussed in terms of societal standards and individual self-expression. There’s a growing recognition of the subjective nature of beauty and an emphasis on inclusivity and diversity in beauty ideals.

Philosophy and Beauty

Philosophically, beauty has been a central topic in aesthetics. Plato saw beauty as an ethereal ideal, while Aristotle considered it a matter of proportion and order. In the modern era, philosophers like Immanuel Kant explored beauty in terms of its ability to provoke a disinterested pleasure, a pleasure that is free from personal desires.

Unorthodox Perspectives

In various subcultures and unorthodox thinking, beauty can take on unique and unconventional forms. It’s often seen as a mode of self-expression and rebellion against mainstream standards.

In conclusion, beauty’s etymology and history reflect its complex, evolving nature. It’s a concept deeply intertwined with cultural, philosophical, and aesthetic ideals, constantly reshaped by societal changes and individual perceptions.

The proper way to approach life:

Never “grow” up!

YEEE

ERIC KIM THOUGHTS ALL

A BLOGGER LIKE A CODER– A MIND-THOUGHT CODER?

ERIC THINKS

An argument for weightlifting equipment.

Essentially now with crypto, the Internet, etc.… There are so many digital things we could purchase.

iron, weightlifting equipment, iron grip plates, weight plates, weightlifting plates are fascinating… Because ultimately you cannot make iron digital.

The modern day idea is simple: if you buy this thing, you will become more masculine and therefore attract more beautiful women.

One of my personal curiosities is thinking about and considering the limits of human strength, human grandeur, without the aid of steroids.

My personal thought is ultimately you still probably need US dollars to pay your rent, buy meat at Costco etc. But once Amazon finally starts accepting bitcoin and cryptocurrency for online purchases, bitcoin and crypto will be gangbusters.

What is also interesting is that because bitcoin has a hard cap, 21, million bitcoins… at least the notion is you cannot print more.

Price of Bitcoin in 30 years?

Thought:

At least $1 million dollars USD a Bitcoin.

The view of Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation is a subject of ongoing debate and depends on one’s perspective on the nature and future of both Bitcoin and traditional financial systems.

Arguments for Bitcoin as a Hedge Against Inflation:

1. Limited Supply: Bitcoin has a capped supply of 21 million coins, which contrasts with fiat currencies that can be printed unlimitedly, potentially leading to inflation.
2. Decentralization: Unlike fiat currencies, which are controlled by central banks and governments, Bitcoin operates on a decentralized network, making it less susceptible to government-induced inflation.
3. Global Asset: Bitcoin is not tied to the economic conditions of any single country, potentially providing a buffer against country-specific inflation.

Arguments Against Bitcoin as a Hedge Against Inflation:

1. Volatility: Bitcoin’s price is highly volatile, which can undermine its reliability as a store of value during inflationary periods.
2. Unproven Track Record: Bitcoin is relatively new and lacks a long history during varied economic conditions, unlike traditional inflation hedges like gold.
3. Regulatory Uncertainty: The potential for increased regulation of cryptocurrencies could affect their value and acceptance, impacting their role as an inflation hedge.

Ultimately, whether Bitcoin is an effective hedge against inflation is subjective and depends on individual beliefs about the stability and future of the cryptocurrency market compared to traditional financial systems. It’s also influenced by broader perspectives on economic and monetary policy. As with any investment, the risk tolerance and investment horizon of the individual play a crucial role in this consideration.

2008… when I was a college sophomore? My roommate Kevin told me, and I dismissed it.

10,000 Bitcoins for a pizza?

10,000 bitcoin price

Don’t be a dummy twice!

Bitcoin philosophers?

The history of Bitcoin, a pioneering cryptocurrency, is as intriguing as it is complex, blending technology, economics, and a bit of mystery.

1. The Mysterious Origin (2008-2009): Bitcoin’s story begins in 2008 when an individual or group under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto published the Bitcoin whitepaper. This paper proposed a decentralized digital currency that could facilitate transactions without the need for a central authority. In January 2009, Nakamoto mined the first block of the Bitcoin network, known as the Genesis Block, starting the Bitcoin blockchain.
2. Early Adoption and Growth (2010-2012): In the early years, Bitcoin was primarily a subject of interest among cryptography enthusiasts and early tech adopters. Its first notable use was in 2010 when a programmer named Laszlo Hanyecz bought two pizzas for 10,000 Bitcoins, a transaction now celebrated as Bitcoin Pizza Day. During this period, Bitcoin started to gain value, though it remained under $10 for most of the time.
3. Surges and Setbacks (2013-2015): Bitcoin’s value surged in 2013, briefly exceeding $1,000, drawing wider attention. However, it faced setbacks, including the infamous Mt. Gox hack in 2014, where a large amount of Bitcoin was stolen, shaking investor confidence.
4. Mainstream Recognition and High Volatility (2016-2017): Bitcoin entered mainstream consciousness in 2016 and 2017, with its value skyrocketing to nearly $20,000 by the end of 2017. This period was marked by the emergence of other cryptocurrencies, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), and heightened regulatory scrutiny.
5. The Era of Institutional Adoption (2018-2020): Although Bitcoin experienced significant price corrections after its 2017 peak, these years were pivotal for its institutional acceptance. Major companies and financial institutions began to recognize Bitcoin as a legitimate asset class.
6. Record Highs and Increased Adoption (2021-present): Bitcoin reached new heights in value, crossing $60,000 in 2021. It continued to gain traction as a potential hedge against inflation and as a digital store of value. The landscape also saw the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), further expanding the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Throughout its history, Bitcoin has been a subject of intense debate and speculation, embodying a mix of innovative technology and unorthodox economic theories. Its decentralized nature and potential for disruption make it a fascinating subject for enthusiasts of technology, economics, and alternative systems of value.

One insanely annoying thing in the world of philosophy and beyond is this notion that objectivity is supreme. This is a bad trend.

Beauty?

Certainly beauty is subjective… To the individual. For example, me as a Korean east Asian man… I think I am actually more genetically attracted to East Asian women, Korean women, Vietnamese women, etc.

As well as Japanese, Chinese, etc.

I don’t feel a strong attraction to Cambodian Khmer women, Thai women etc. Theory: we are more attracted to people who look like us?

The war on beauty?

WTF AI don’t have ethics?.

Closeup on beautiful female faces

Creating close-up images of individual faces, particularly without a specific context or creative concept, falls outside the scope of the types of images I can generate. The focus of the image generation tool is to create artistic, conceptual, or illustrative visuals rather than portraits or detailed depictions of individual faces.

If you have a different type of creative or conceptual image in mind, or if there’s a specific scene or idea you’d like to explore visually, please let me know and I’ll be happy to assist!

Just ChatGPT yourself?

Elon Musk understands what is sexy and not. 

Just treat everything like an experiment? 

Either have a full manual transmission car, five speed or six speed manual shifting transmission, or, or have a fully automated self driving car, or some sort of minimalistic automatic car.

Also with design aesthetics, I really really really hate automatic shifting knobs and cars. Aesthetically it is so ugly and unnecessary. Good to look at the design of Hyundai, Genesis, Acura and Honda which has gotten rid of the silly automatic shifting stock, and instead, turned it all into buttons.

“Get rid of the stalks!” – Elon Musk

I really think that Elon Musk is like Steve Jobs 4.0. By comparison he makes Steve Jobs look unambitious.

Why Elon Musk? I think what people don’t understand or appreciate is how obsessed Elon Musk is with design, design thinking, design principles. For example, his obsession with designing a Tesla without any steering wheel, shifting mechanisms, stocks, etc. In fact, Elon Musk is almost like an extreme minimalist.

What I personally love about Tesla and Tesla cars is the Spartan luxury, extreme minimalism. For example, I still marvel at the Tesla model 3; first, I’m just so happy and excited and proud and amazed that Elon Musk pulled it off. I remember before it was put into production and before I saw any on the streets… it was just a rabbit hole fantasy. Now it is live!

What I find so insanely innovative about the Tesla model 3 is the extreme simplicity, the extreme minimalism. To make the dashboard so sublimely simple is a design masterpiece.

Personally, I really dislike the Tesla model Y; my general thought is that any sort of crossover vehicle, or even sports utility vehicle is some sort of a design compromise. Even the Tesla model X is almost like a Tesla model S on steroids.

Why is it so difficult to minimize?

I think the reason why it is so difficult to minimize is that there seems to be some sort of trend or market desire for their to be new features, new products, new additions to motivate people to buy something. But, from a zen capitalism perspective, perhaps this is not a good idea.

Why? I’m more effective way to think about things is figuring out what to get rid of, what to reduce, what to delete. For example, let us never forget the pure genius of Steve Jobs getting rid of the keyboard on the smartphone, and also getting rid of all these silly ugly ports. If it wasn’t for Steve Jobs and his insane design vision, we wouldn’t have the beautiful minimalistic smart phone that we have today.

Would it have eventually happened or not?

I think a lot of people think about technology and think that it is all inevitable… given enough time resources and people… these things will magically get invented anyways. I don’t think this is actually the case. You actually need a few insane individuals to bring these things into fruition.

Once again, read Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson and also Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson. You find that both these individuals have an insanely epic and grand life mission… is what drives them.

Idea:

Walter Isaacson should write a book or a biography on Kanye West?

---

Other things you can barbell in life

1. 90% of your savings and money in boring bonds, high yield interest CD’s or high yield savings account (5%!) and 10% in insanely speculative crypto (imagine losing it all). Best advice I got from NASSIM TALEB in ANTIFRAGILE.
2. Often, 90% of your annoyances in life come from 10% of the people in your life. Get rid of these 10%.
3. 90% of your joy and happiness and life come from 10% of the things. Try to determine and ascertain what this 10% is.

How to think better:

1. ZEN OF ERIC BOT
2. ERIC KIM BOT: For photo
3. Bitcoin Babe: speculate in crypto

---

Have fun with EK!

Super fun workshops in the pipeline:

1. INTRODUCTION TO STOICISM WORKSHOP: Downtown LA, DECEMBER 2nd, 2023
2. DOWNTOWN CULVER CITY FAMILY STREET PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP, DECEMBER 16, 2023

2024

1. CONQUER CONFIDENCE ONLINE WORKSHOP: Jan 27, 2024
2. March 2nd: ERIC KIM CREATIVE AI & PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP (New!)— Culver City, LA
3. April 20th, 2024: SF ZEN PHOTOGRAPHY WORKSHOP – Now Live!

EK WORK

---

HAPTIC

HAPTIC PRODUCTS >

---

What is EK up to?

So I just finished the book going infinite by Michael Lewis on the rise and fall of Sam Bankman Fried and FTX. Super fun and fascinating read. My personal suggestion is even if you have a tiny interest in crypto, bitcoin or whatever… It is definitely worth a read.

A quick summary is that Sam isn’t the evil villain that everyone wants him to be. He is almost like an uber genius autistic mathematical servant, who seems to just lack common sense.

Also on a positive note, I think the great upside to consider here is that if bitcoin was able to bounce back after the fall of FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried… a very bright future ahead of us in crypto. My personal price projection is I am quite certain that bitcoin will bounce back to at least $65,000 a bitcoin by next year. Therefore if you want a quick 2X profit, seems like a fun speculation. and no no no, don’t bet your house on it. Once again our financial thinking is simple:

Never put more than 10% of your life savings into anything. Irregardless of how good.

Also for funsies, a fun little essay I’ve written on the philosophy of crypto:

---

The Philosophy of Crypto

“Greed is good” – Gordon Gecko

So it seems and appears that a lot of people seek getting really really rich, really really fast, in order to buy a bunch of stuff. For example, I think the general idea is that you want to make a ton of money, feel good, buy a Lamborghini or whatever… And then what?

Crypto, cryptocurrency, crypto technology to me is fascinating because it is new, sexy, unorthodox, and interesting.

It seems that a lot of people are interested in crypto, bitcoin etc because they want to get really rich. But the tricky thing with crypto is that essentially you are really rich on paper, but typically most crypto speculators never actually dilute or convert their crypto to US dollars, which means that crypto money is not liquid, it is locked.

Crypto is intrinsically optimistic?

Crypto to me is interesting because it is edgy, optimistic, radical, and bold. Also a bit reckless.

The general idea is that with crypto, people are seeking a new revolution, something to up and the old system. Definitely a lot of anarchy vibes here, and a lot of people who are typically distrustful of big organizations, big government, etc.

Honestly I have nothing against the government, I am very happy paying my taxes, I still consider myself a bay area, liberal, open minded, at heart. I love democracy, democratic thinking. Why? It was mostly about how I was raised, how I was supported. If I did not get all of these government aided resources, like going to UCLA as an undergraduate, I would have never been able to become who I am today.

Also, simple organizations that I am grateful for include the Boy Scouts, Boy Scouts of America. I am forever grateful to my troop, my troop leaders, who helped me become an Eagle Scout, and helped me become the citizen that I am today.

Growing up, I grew up thinking that conservatives, Republicans were the devil. Why were they so greedy, if they had so much money, why don’t they help more poor people or people in need?

Irregardless, I think the promise of crypto is a more brilliant future. A lot of people seem to disdain the volatility of crypto, but I love it. With traditional stocks, you will never see a 10X gain, a 100X gain, or even a 1000x gain. Also with crypto, you could win it all, or you could lose it all. My general strategy towards crypto and cryptocurrency speculation is this:

Only put money into crypto, assuming that it will go to zero.

Perhaps the best piece of advice that I got from Nassim Taleb in his antifragile book is the idea that to maximize your gains, better to put 90% of your money in maximally boring funds, like bonds, yield savings account etc.… it is pretty crazy even now Cindy and I have a bunch of money just locked in a simple 5% APR savings account, and we get close to $2000 a month in “passive income” interest. Then, what I did was I put 10% of our savings into crypto, maximally speculative bets, initially investing in digibyte and bitcoin, later swapping it all to chainlink, along the way getting some Dogecoin, later transferring it all 100% back into Bitcoin.

All of the gains were mental. And along the way more recently, I’ve been drawing out some money from bitcoin, $5000 USD here US$5000 there… Simply to cover up moving expenses to LA.

The zen of crypto?

Ultimately what I find interesting is that crypto, people who speculate in crypto all tend to live kind of a more monastic Zen monk lifestyle. Even this one guy that I met who first got me into chainlink, revealed to me that he was a crypto whale in chainlink; apparently he first put his life savings in it, maybe $10,000 USD or so when it was worth about $.70, and then he saw it rise all the way up to $50 USD.

It was funny, because I would just see him at the local LA fitness working out, thinking and meditating, we would engage in some lively conversation, and he just drove his mom‘s old Honda Accord, I think he later told me that he was moving to Puerto Rico or something in order to avoid taxes on his crypto or some other regulatory aspects. Apparently even Sam Bankman Fried moved his corporation to the Bahamas, in order to avoid US regulation.

So what do you want to do with your wealth?

So once you are worth $20 billion, or $150 billion or whatever … then what?

Ironically the best use of money is simply peace of mind. That means money is not really a tool or a mechanism to buy a bunch of stuff that you like, but rather, being able to live a more zen, tranquil, more focused life.

For example, I think the reason why people are so addicted to email is that people are always desiring new “opportunities”, it is predicated on the fact that somehow other people will give you an afford you new opportunities and also, does predicated on the fact that somehow new opportunities will rise in which other people give you money.

But… assuming that no human being who messages you in your email inbox will give you money… would you still be interested in working with them?

For myself personally, I have close to zero interest in money. I am more interested in new opportunities, fun, new novel experiences. The things that I am proud of, or interested in, or grateful for is all of the cool interesting and sexy opportunities that I’ve had and done. Some of the people that I met, etc.

But ultimately, is there a human being more interesting than you?

Future trends

I’m currently reading the book “Going Infinite” by Michael Lewis, which chronicles is the life of Sam Bankman Fried and FTX and I find it insanely fascinating read. It seems that the same guy isn’t really the super evil guy that a lot of people in the media make him to be; the kid seems to be like a prodigy genius, mathematical minded, who really didn’t care for money or wealth. My personal theory is that he got suckered too much into this utilitarian “effective altruism“, concept… that he misused customer funds in order to “maximize“ his abilities for effective altruism.

I think effective altruism is a bad idea. Why? First of all, I think the general idea of altruism is bad; I think it puts other people in an inferior position, which I personally find is disrespectful. I think a better thing to do instead is on a day-to-day basis, instead of donating money to charities or whatever, to help empower other human beings on a one-to-one basis.

A simple thing; whenever I go to the park with Sen, and I see all these kids running around, who don’t really seem like they get much attention or love from their parents, I try to give them a little bit of that love and attention by talking to them, entertaining them etc. Perhaps this is a more effective way to “change the world“, than anything else.

---

The future of crypto?

Try to think about things on a 30 year basis. That means, the simple question; in 30 years, are people going to be using crypto more or less? Or, in 30 years, is the price of bitcoin going to go up or down? It seems pretty obvious that it will go up.

Also, the notion of a “digital wallet”. The general idea is that for the future, we ain’t gonna use cash money anymore. Why? I see more and more restaurants in institutions not except paper cash money. Why not? Because it is difficult to track, and I think there are also issues with employees at restaurants stealing money it etc. Even at my mom‘s old sushi restaurant where she worked at for a long time, she later found out that one of the head managers, a guy that we thought was a super good guy… Was secretly stealing money the whole time.

I think into the future, we will see less and less of “under the table“ payments; why? Because it is not trackable.

---

What else?

Some personal thoughts:

First, I don’t really like Ethereum. Why? It is kind of like android; maybe it is the better technology, but it isn’t sexy, only nerds know about it and use it, it ain’t mainstream and sexy like bitcoin. Bitcoin is like Apple, having the newest iPhone, iPhone Pro etc.… Ethereum is more like android, having an ugly Google pixel or some sort of generic Samsung smartphone.

Another analogy, bitcoin is like having the Lamborghini Countach, with the scissor doors, whereas Ethereum is like having the Toyota Corolla?

Altcoins?

Don’t trust old coins, or alternative coins. Why? Everyone just wants to become the next bitcoin, but ultimately… There is too much meme culture behind alt coins, like Dogecoin and Shiba Inu.

I am very dubious that the price of these Altcoins will ever go up; it seems that a lot of people in the crypto world simply over hype certain crypto technologies and coins, in order to pump it up, sell it, and make money.

Chainlink

Besides bitcoin, only other crypto I find interesting is chainlink. I’ve read all the white papers, and been following the chainlink blog for a long time. Currently the only reason that I’m still committed to bitcoin is that my gut feeling is that even though chain-link is really great, the issue is that it is going to be difficult for it to become mainstream.

First and foremost, it is difficult to explain what it is. The technology is good and great, but I don’t think the general market will understand it.

Also, the fact that there was a chainlink version two is not a good sign. Anything with a version two is probably a bad sign; same thing with Ethereum.

Also, the logo in blue is not very attractive. And the name isn’t that catchy.

---

Now what?

I recommend reading going infinite by Michael Lewis, it is an insanely fascinating read, if you’re interested at all about financial markets, how it is all gamed by bots etc. My first revelation reading Michael Lewis was flash boys… Learning the truth behind these hidden high frequency trading firms.

And also, I think the sign of good writer, like Michael Lewis is at the Rita’s fun entertaining and also insightful. It seems that the best way to kill two birds with one stone is simple; make it both entertaining to read, and also interesting knowledge.

Think more, walk more

My simple suggestions on living a better life:

1. Walk 50 miles a day
2. Maximize your direct sunlight UV exposure radiation
3. Just build a simple home gym: Titan.fitness equipment seems fine. Ideally work out outside in the direct sun, like an ancient spartan would do.
4. Start blogging! bluehost.com and install WordPress.org. If you’re more nerdy you could also set up WordPress with lightsail— I did this for erickimphilosophy.com and also erickimfitness.com

---

Now what?

The world is yours! No drugs, no alcohol, no weed… just joy, bright light, weight lifting and exercise, walks in nature .. we the new zen stoics!

EK

---

Start Here

Some good freebies:

1. Ultimate beginners guide to street photography PDF
2. Street portrait manual
3. 100 lessons from the masters of street photography

BOOKS BY KIM >

Forward the thoughts

If you feel like you even got one fun thought here… feel free to forward this to a friend!

EK NEWS

---

Why is everything and everyone so serious nowadays?

Better be silly, fun ridiculous instead!

Just ChatGPT yourself?

Eric Kim is a highly recognized figure in the world of street photography and education. His journey began as a personal hobby, fueled by a passion for capturing candid moments. This passion evolved into a career marked by innovation and a robust online presence. Kim is particularly noted for his candid street photography, capturing life’s raw emotions and everyday moments in various cities around the world.

His approach to photography is multifaceted, encompassing not only the technical aspects but also the philosophical. Key aspects of his philosophy include:

1. Open-Source Photography: Kim champions the democratization of photography education, sharing his insights, tutorials, and even his work for free.
2. Personal Photography: He emphasizes the importance of creating personally meaningful photos, rather than seeking external validation.
3. Everyday Life: A significant portion of his work highlights the beauty and significance in mundane, everyday moments.
4. The Cindy Project: Named after his wife, this project captures his life’s journey with his partner, showcasing the idea that meaningful photographs don’t necessarily require exotic locations.
5. Conquering Fears: Kim focuses on helping photographers overcome the fear of street photography, providing tips and techniques for shooting in public spaces.
6. Minimalism: His philosophy also includes minimalism in photography, in terms of both equipment and approach.

As an educator, Eric Kim has conducted numerous workshops globally, sharing his knowledge and experience in street photography. He’s written extensively on topics ranging from photography techniques to deeper philosophical discussions about art and life. His blog serves as a rich resource for photographers, and he has produced several e-books and physical books on photography, often making them accessible for free or at an affordable price.

Overall, Eric Kim’s influence extends beyond photography; he delves into philosophical discussions about life, art, and the purpose and meaning behind photography, setting him apart from many other photographers in the field oai_citation:1,Who is ERIC KIM? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:2,How did Eric Kim become so successful? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:3,How did Eric Kim become Eric Kim? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:4,Who is ERIC KIM? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:5,Who is ERIC KIM? – ERIC KIM oai_citation:6,Who is ERIC KIM? – ERIC KIM.

Why do people want to deny these differences?

The topic of acknowledging or denying physiological differences between males and females can be complex, influenced by a variety of social, cultural, scientific, and philosophical factors. Here are some reasons why this topic can be contentious or lead to denial:

1. Social and Political Equality: In efforts to promote equality between genders, emphasizing differences can sometimes be perceived as reinforcing stereotypes or justifying unequal treatment. This perspective may lead to downplaying or denying physiological differences in favor of highlighting similarities and shared human traits.
2. Historical Misuse of Biological Differences: Historically, physiological differences have been misused to justify discrimination or unequal treatment in areas like employment, education, and rights. This misuse has made some people cautious about discussing these differences.
3. Complexity of Gender and Sex: The increasing recognition of the complexity of gender identity and the distinction between gender (a social construct) and sex (biologically defined) can complicate discussions about physiological differences. There is a growing understanding that gender is not strictly binary and encompasses a spectrum, which can influence how people view sex-based physiological differences.
4. Fear of Oversimplification: Biology is complex, and individuals can vary greatly. There’s concern that emphasizing average differences can lead to oversimplification or generalizations that don’t account for the wide range of abilities and characteristics within each gender.
5. Scientific Debate: In some areas, the science itself is still evolving. There are ongoing debates and research into how significant these differences are and how they manifest in various aspects of life. This can lead to differing interpretations and conclusions.
6. Cultural Sensitivities: In today’s globalized world, discussions about gender and sex differences are influenced by diverse cultural and religious beliefs, which can affect how these topics are perceived and discussed.
7. Changing Societal Norms: As societal norms evolve, there’s a shift towards focusing on individual abilities and traits rather than categorizing based on gender. This shift sometimes leads to a reluctance to emphasize differences that are seen as potentially divisive.

It’s important to approach this topic with a nuanced understanding, recognizing the validity of physiological differences while also being mindful of the broader social and cultural contexts in which these discussions take place. The challenge lies in acknowledging biological realities without reinforcing stereotypes or inequalities.

Male vs female physiology

The physiological differences between males and females are rooted in biology and affect various aspects of health and physical performance. Here are some key distinctions:

1. Muscle Mass and Strength: Males typically have more muscle mass and greater physical strength due to higher levels of testosterone. This hormone plays a key role in muscle development and maintenance.
2. Fat Distribution: Females generally have a higher percentage of body fat compared to males. The distribution of fat also differs, with females more likely to store fat in the hips, buttocks, and thighs, while males tend to accumulate it around the abdomen.
3. Heart Size and Function: On average, males have larger hearts and higher cardiac output, which can influence exercise capacity and endurance.
4. Hormonal Fluctuations: Females experience more hormonal fluctuations due to the menstrual cycle, which can impact various aspects of health, mood, and physical performance.
5. Reproductive Systems: There are obvious differences in reproductive anatomy, with males having testes and females having ovaries. These organs produce different sex hormones, which have widespread effects on the body.
6. Bone Structure and Density: Males generally have denser and larger bones. Differences in bone structure, especially in the pelvis, are also pronounced.
7. Metabolic Rates: Males typically have a higher basal metabolic rate (BMR) than females, meaning they burn more calories at rest. This is partly due to having more muscle mass.
8. Endurance and Fatigue: Studies suggest that females might have a greater resistance to muscle fatigue compared to males, potentially due to differences in muscle fiber type and energy metabolism.
9. Pain Perception and Response: Research indicates differences in pain perception and response between genders, which could be influenced by both biological and social factors.
10. Lifespan and Aging: On average, females tend to live longer than males. This difference is influenced by a combination of genetic, hormonal, behavioral, and environmental factors.

Understanding these differences is crucial in areas like medicine, sports science, and nutrition, as it allows for more tailored approaches in treatment, training, and lifestyle recommendations.

The history of espresso is deeply intertwined with technological and cultural developments:

1. Origins in Coffee: Espresso’s roots lie in the broader history of coffee, which has been consumed since ancient times.
2. 19th Century Innovations: The quest for quick, concentrated coffee led to the development of various machines in the 19th century, particularly in Europe.
3. Early 20th Century: In 1901, Luigi Bezzera, an Italian inventor, patented the first true espresso machine. This machine used steam pressure to force hot water through finely-ground coffee, creating a strong, concentrated brew.
4. Post World War II: Espresso culture flourished in Italy post-World War II. Machines became more sophisticated, incorporating high pressure and a lever pump.
5. Global Spread: Espresso became popular globally in the late 20th century, partly due to the rise of coffee chains and increased appreciation for Italian coffee culture.
6. Modern Espresso: Today, espresso is a cornerstone of coffee culture worldwide, enjoyed for its richness and intensity, and serving as the base for a variety of coffee drinks.

Prolonged sitting can have several negative effects on your physiology:

1. Musculoskeletal Issues: It can lead to weakened and tight muscles, especially in the lower body. The lack of movement can cause back pain due to increased pressure on the back muscles and spinal discs.
2. Cardiovascular Health: Sitting for long periods is linked to increased risk of heart disease. It reduces blood circulation, potentially leading to the development of cardiovascular issues.
3. Metabolic Changes: Extended sitting can negatively impact the body’s ability to regulate blood sugar, potentially increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity.
4. Mental Health: There’s evidence suggesting that excessive sitting can affect mental well-being, contributing to issues like anxiety and depression.
5. Posture and Flexibility: Prolonged sitting can lead to poor posture and reduced flexibility, particularly in the hips and back.

It’s important to take regular breaks to stand or walk, and engage in physical activities to mitigate these effects.

Either have a full manual transmission car, five speed or six speed manual to ship transmission, or, or have a fully automated self driving car, or some sort of minimalistic automatic car.

Also with design aesthetics, I really really really hate automatic shifting knobs and cars. Statically it is so ugly and unnecessary. Good to look at the design of Hyundai, Genesis, Acura and Honda which has gotten rid of the silly automatic shifting stock, and instead, turned it all into buttons.

“Get rid of the stalks!” – Elon Musk

I really think that Elon Musk is like Steve Jobs 4.0. By comparison he makes Steve Jobs look unambitious.

Why Elon Musk? I think what people don’t understand or appreciate is how obsessed Elon Musk is with design, design thinking, design principles. For example, his obsession with designing a Tesla without any steering wheel, shifting mechanisms, stocks, etc. In fact, Elon Musk is almost like an extreme minimalist.

What I personally love about Tesla and Tesla cars is the Spartan luxury, extreme minimalism. For example, I still marvel at the Tesla model three; first, I’m just so happy and excited and proud and amazed that Elon musk pulled it off. I remember before it was Put into production and before I saw any on the streets… It was just a rabbit hole fantasy. Now it is live!

What I find so insanely innovative about the Tesla model three is the extreme simplicity, the extreme minimalism. To make the dashboard so sublimely simple is a design masterpiece.

Personally, I really dislike the Tesla model Y; my general thought is that any sort of crossover vehicle, or even sports utility vehicle is some sort of a design compromise. Even the Tesla model X is almost like a Tesla model S on steroids.

Why is it so difficult to minimize?

I think the reason why it is so difficult to minimize is that there seems to be some sort of trend or market desire for their to be new features, new products, new additions to motivate people to buy something. But, from a Zen capitalism perspective, Perhaps this is not a good idea.

Why? I’m more effective way to think about things is figuring out what to get rid of, what to reduce, what to delete. For example, let us never forget the pure genius of Steve Jobs getting rid of the keyboard on the smart phone, and also getting rid of all these silly ugly ports. if it wasn’t for Steve Jobs and his insane design vision, we wouldn’t have the beautiful minimalistic smart phone that we have today.

Would it have eventually happened or not?

I think a lot of people think about technology and think that it is all inevitable… Given enough time resources and people… These things will magically get invented anyways. I don’t think this is actually the case. You actually need a few insane individuals to bring these things into fruition.

Once again, read Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson and also Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson. You find that both these individuals have an insanely epic in grand life mission… Is what drives them.

Idea:

Walter Isaacson should write a book or a biography on Kanye West?

---

My thoughts:

Products to get rid of:

1. iPad mini— people would prefer to just have an iPhone, iPhone pro instead or just a normal sized iPad.
2. iPhone Plus and iPhone Max: Big phones are bad.

“Natural looking” vs “fake looking” beauty?

We want beautiful women to desire us… but what if we don’t desire them? 

“Content guidelines”?

***

If I ran Apple?

***

Why we shouldn’t trust vegans 

***

Simplify design, icon, features?

1. Insanely strong demigod legs: For standing, walking, carrying heavy loads… aesthetics, beauty, true manliness. You can see the true strength of someone when you see them in short shorts! Observe the hips, thighs, calves!
2. Powerful arms: Not necessarily just biceps — in order to carry your kid (my goal is to be able to arm carry Seneca until he is 12 years old), holding up your iPad Pro, your camera, during vlogging, recording etc.

The history of sitting is a fascinating journey through time and cultures, reflecting human innovation, social customs, and ergonomic understanding.

Ancient Beginnings: The earliest forms of seating can be traced back to ancient civilizations, like Egypt and Mesopotamia. These seats were often simple, like stools, and reserved for the elite. This idea of seating as a symbol of status was prevalent in many ancient societies, including Ancient Greece and Rome.

Middle Ages to Renaissance: In medieval Europe, seating was rudimentary for the common folk, often just benches or stools. However, the nobility had more elaborate chairs, like the throne, symbolizing power. The Renaissance brought a shift towards art and beauty in furniture design, and chairs became more ornate and comfortable.

Industrial Revolution: This era marked a significant shift. Mass production made chairs more accessible to the general populace. The design focus shifted towards comfort and practicality, leading to innovations like the office chair and the recliner.

Modern Era: The 20th century brought radical changes in design philosophy, influenced by movements like Bauhaus and Scandinavian design. Chairs were not just functional; they were artistic statements. The Eames Lounge Chair, for instance, became an icon of modern design.

Ergonomics and Health: Today, there’s a growing awareness of the health impacts of prolonged sitting, leading to ergonomic designs and alternatives like standing desks and kneeling chairs.

This evolution of sitting mirrors broader changes in society and technology. From status symbols to mass-produced commodities, chairs reflect our changing relationship with work, leisure, and health.

Do you remember “deviant art”? Or Flickr? Glad I never went deviant art path.

Websites, blogs last!

I’m the king!

The world of AI, ChatGPT, ChatGPT 4, DALL-E, DALL-E 3 and beyond?

Image generation tools… f’ing insane!!

Create in a spirit of fun!

For example for iPadOS team … common get rid of those ugly little annoying three dot things in the middle of every window!

No more (…) thing in the center of the window. Kills the beauty.

Also— ain’t nobody use split screen for iPad or iPadOS. Best used single tasking!

Audio

New goals: